No video

Poly X50 and Neat Bar Comparison

Both dialling into Microsoft Teams video calls, lets have a look at the power and performance of these two leading all in one video conferencing bars from Poly and Neat
00:00 - Intro
00:20 - Poly X50 & Neat Bar
01:44 - Poly X50 in a Microsoft Teams Meeting testing sound, video, tracking and grouping settings
05:40 - Neat Bar in a Microsoft Teams Meeting testing sound, video, tracking and framing settings
10:33 - Yealink A20 quick comparison
11:43 - Control Panel
12:25 - Neat Pulse management
13:12 - Poly Lens management

Пікірлер: 5

  • @user-gl1rn6jb1s
    @user-gl1rn6jb1s Жыл бұрын

    This is great y'all, thank you so much!

  • @cre8ivauk
    @cre8ivauk Жыл бұрын

    Actually quite useful! Two products that I am actually looking in to and to see them compared is great. I think the neat bar performed some of the tracking, a little bit smoother and perhaps a little bit quicker. But the Poly does seem to work really nice when speaker tracking is enabled and you’ve maybe got four people around the table. It’s quite nice that it slowly moves from one person zooming out to show everybody, then zooming into the other person that talks and then zooming out again.

  • @ISDMsolutions

    @ISDMsolutions

    Жыл бұрын

    Appreciate the feedback Chris, glad you found it useful. Feel free to reach out if you require any further information.

  • @james30601
    @james30601 Жыл бұрын

    Both solutions sounds like your in a fish bowl. Rooms acoustics dictate the appropriate microphone solution in the room. All in one is always not the solution

  • @ISDMsolutions

    @ISDMsolutions

    Жыл бұрын

    Completely agree, all in one solutions are not always the answer, there are a lot of things to take into consideration. However, they can be a great option for customers with lots of small meeting rooms looking to roll out standards.