What's the point of the lume shot if they're going to be covered by preview windows...

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, this is the result of two different parts of the process being performed by two different people. I'll ask that these videos (i.e., comparisons) be stripped of those tone-deaf end cards. Best, Tim

@lennartmartin7361

5 жыл бұрын

Always nice to see you guys so responsive to commentary. And I also choose the 300m. @@the1916companywatchreviews

Beautiful watches, who could choose and you can't go wrong with either one. Very special timepieces. Thanks for your detailed and quick review.

Very informative review. Thank you!

Omega should have went with a bright white font for the date window on the brushed chrome dial Seamaster Diver 300M. You can hardly see it. It looks like the 6 o'clock indice fell out of the dial.

Beautiful Omega watches. I admit to being partial to the larger watch with the wave dial face and the pearl markers for the dial markers. I like the metal band with the gold inserts. I think this watch is by far one of the best lookimg sports/dive watches out there.I would love to add one to my collection.

I tried both the new 300 and the PO 43.5. Even though I have small wrists the design of the PO lugs and bracelet links allows it to sit on my wrist perfectly and it has great presence. The bezel of the PO is far superior, the 300 bezel is hard to turn and in my opinion not a proper dive bezel. Bought the PO and find it a superb watch.

@chrismartin5196

5 жыл бұрын

Have to agree with your comments on the bezel. Definitely a massively better design (for its intended uses).

@stevealperstein8836

5 жыл бұрын

@Dapdoi Ardon You're obviously not a diver.

I’ve had my dive 300 as the one featured here for two months and I have to say it’s exceeded my expectations, It’s Absolutely gorgeous with substance and elegance.

The releases from O have been best in class for the last 5 yrs or so.. smashing it

Great as always, Thank You !

Both watches are good looking, I like the Planet Ocean Blue dial one better, but like the size of the other one, and agree about the leather strip, so it's more money to get it were you can use it and love it. Great video as always Thank you

This chap knows his business!

Have already... bought the new Seamaster in silver 2 weeks ago. Loving it ;)

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

You chose well! Wear it in great health. Best, Tim

@fiatjustitiaruatclum7557

5 жыл бұрын

Saw it today and it was sexy af but the bracelet felt werid, the links felt stiff and didn't provide much movement compared to an oyster bracelet

@jrgb9945

5 жыл бұрын

El Diablo Silver vs the Blue had to be a very tough choice.

I was actually looking at both watches and ended up buying the SMP. It looks so much nicer in person

Couldn’t agree more Tim. Got my new 300M Blue on Bracelet 2.5 months ago straight from the boutique and haven’t taken it off since!

@algorithm007ify

5 жыл бұрын

The submariner killer, IMO.

@eflo8264

5 жыл бұрын

Congrats on the new watch...I picked mine up last week, and I notice that the minute markers on bezel starting from the 12:00 pip through the 10 min markers Are uneven. They start lining up at the 15 min marker. Do yours line up?

@algorithm007ify

5 жыл бұрын

@@eflo8264It could be a visual illusion. This often happens with chronograph second hands on reset...because of our stereo-vision. Close one eye and assess the alignment. The one I have is aligned perfectly.

I never have used, nor likely ever will use, the bezel timer for diving...BUT! I use them for timing EVERYTHING from cooking, to exercise, to travel times locally...there is no problem with turning the 300M bezel old or new...wet or dry. You really have to be a klutz not to be able to use the 300M bezel. The PO is easier to grip, but I have to concentrate to note that distinction. Normal people won't notice. The PO lume is VERY bright on mine and lasts all night. I have to wonder how and for how long you "charged" each and how long before you photographed them.

Tim, great comparison and as always great content, I would agree the the 300 would be first on my wrist.

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Hi Al, thanks for this kind feedback. The SMP 300M is the easy choice over any Omega diver. Unless you MUST go retro with the 300 Master or actually work in deepwater salvage and want a PloProf, the 25th anniversary Bond is close to mandatory when shopping Omega divers. Best, Tim

I think the nicest Diver 300 is the non-wave black dial, the dial is a high-gloss black, looks incredible! Can’t decide between these two, but maybe think the Diver on a blue rubber strap maybe given it is a rarer colour. Thou if you like the grey but want a taller more chunky 300, look at the ETNZ limited edition...

I have the original PO at 45.5mm and I recently tried on the new 39mm PO. Due to the height I have to say 41mm-42mm is really the sweat spot.

Both are amazing in their own ways. I still think it’s odd to put a leather strap on a dive watch, however. I think I’d go for the bracelet on both.

8:25 Incredibly compelling. The watches and the review. Kudos!

I’ve owned both, sold the PO as much prefer the SM 300, the White dial version of this is a real beauty.

Thanks for the review. I have a 2016 300M, and I think is much more beautiful than the new. For me the waves dont come in, only the movement that I missing. This Planet Ocean is very very nice, maybe the next watch I buy. Sorry for my English.

Hi Tim, how long have Omega used White Gold for Hands and Indices on the planet ocean?

Hi Tim, thanks for the comparison. You mentioned the PO has white gold indices and hands, is that also the case in the earlier generation PO's with the 8500/9300 movements? Thanks!

@singaporehikers

4 жыл бұрын

Is it solid white gold or plated?

Omega have upped their game I have owned both of these models in earlier iterations and I have to say the 300 pro has it all for significantly lower price.

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

I have the original 2531. It's clearly related, but the first-run model feels crude compared to the new one. It's the same difference you feel between any given Omega SMP and something like a Longines Conquest or TAG Aquaracer... and possibly even greater than that gap. Best, Tim

Just wondering, why are leather bands not considered waterproof? I mean i get why it's not considered to be water activity strap, but what does the leather do? Does it get smelly, or damaged when it's submerged in water?

hello. where do you measure your wrist size? at the bottom of your wrist (arround/bellow your wrist bone) or where you wear your watches?

Which is the best in build quality? Diver 300 or Planet Ocean?

I went for a used PO with the liquid metal bezel recently and from the moment I put it on I was in love with it. IMHO it has way more going for it than many alternatives. I was worried the strap wouldn't be as durable as a metal band but it is showing no wear at all just like the case and bezel; not a mark on it after wearing it every day. Like most people I'm not crazy about the date but I can live with it and the accuracy is top notch. My scrawny wrists mean that 40mm is my sweet spot and this PO been a great introduction into watches that are a step up in price for me. Excellent comparison video.

Why not compare the original blue dial 300m with this ocean planet , Tim

Great comparison. I notice that on the 300M the 12:00 pip to the 10 minute markers are uneven. I noticed this after taking my new watch home last week . I compared it to my Sub, and much less expensive divers, and they all line up perfectly. Is this a design flaw in the 300m or intentionally left uneven. I can’t unsee it once I noticed it. Anyone else notice this too?

@harrysmith3502

5 жыл бұрын

eflo82 I hear ya!!! With the pip at 12, it sits just to the right. It’s driving me mad!! I should have returned it within the 30 days. I might have a moan at Omega... my wife laughs at me as I stare at it hoping for it to align lol. Tilting my wrist the lift hides it 😟

Still waiting for a PO 39.5 vs Sub C Date video :)

Wonder if anyone has ever measured their weights? Which one is lighter? Thanks!

Good review. My pick is the Diver 300 Meter

Love the blue PO. I have the 45.5 mm PO in orange and love it. The classic PO.

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

That's a beast of a watch. I can't wear it, but there's no denying the quality of a full-size PO. Best, Tim

Do they both use the same blue? ......... I think the blues look slightly different but the light was always different on them.

Great comparison, had the new 39.5 PO and eventually flipped it. The time keeping was great with the new movement but I felt it sat way too high on the wrist and consequently wasn’t comfortable. Felt like a hockey puck on the wrist. If they got these down to under 13mm then it would be a different story.

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Try a pre-2006 SMP 300M. The co-ax is thick, and the sapphire display caseback makes it more so... not a problem back in 2000, 01, 02... Best, Tim

Is liquid metal, better than enamel on a bezel ?

I owned a midsize seamaster 300 from 2000-2015 and I'm in the market for a replacement. I was thrilled with the look of the new 300 until I saw one in the flesh, I can't put my finger on it, it just doesn't wow me. The Planet Ocean on the other hand just oozes quality. Despite the extra cost it would be the 600 for me.

@ksaucegti

4 жыл бұрын

Same. Once i got the new 300m on my wrist it just looked kind of.....cheap? For me its the white numbers on the bezel. Now the black and gold 300m is a much different story. Will probably still go PO in the end though.

I have the new Omega seamaster 300m 42mm black edition! And I love it! Nothing compares!😉😉😉

@ejjrl1ify

5 жыл бұрын

Laszlo Patay apart from a Rolex sports 😉

I got the full blue version new 300m. Love it!

@jeffreyblue627

5 жыл бұрын

I’ve had the blue dial on the steel bracelet for a couple months now. It’s a real stunner. I love mine too

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Paul A, well done! That's a great watch. Omega nailed this one. Best, Tim

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Congrats, Jeffrey! The full bracelet is worth buying for the clasp alone. Best, Tim

@lennartmartin7361

5 жыл бұрын

What colour would be the more timeless option. Do people have thoughts about that?@@the1916companywatchreviews

@mikemush9741

5 жыл бұрын

@@lennartmartin7361 Hard to beat black as far as being timeless....classic. But I think the blue pops a bit more. I'll have my blue one in about 12 hours. The wait for FedEx is brutal.

You got a train to catch after the video?

@prlinding

5 жыл бұрын

Its ok to pause and breath! Lol

The 300M is the winner for me. Wave dial, 6 o'clock date, and larger size does it. I'd get the bracelet version and get a custom blue/grey strap.

Are you sure the PO has white gold hands and indexes? Not rhodium plated bronze?

Have a 2500 series PO-full Orange. Love it. Rock solid time keeping. The bezel faded a bit which makes me sad. The new Seamaster w wave dial looks awesome. Sure beats that sad ass Seamaster they put on Bond last time.

Great review Tim. Recently visited my local AD and tried on the SMP and the 43.5mm PO to try and decide between the two models. Both sit similarly on the wrist (with the PO noticeably taller). Though not a problem for me on my 7.5” wrist, the bling factor of the PO just didn’t sit right with me. Just a bit too shiny for a “tool watch “. I wish they made the the PO closer to the fit and finish of the original 2500 or even the 8500 movement, with a brushed ceramic bezel and perhaps a bit slimmer profile. Although I prefer the case and bracelet of the PO, I feel because of its shiny exterior, and its height for most people, I feel the current SMP model will fare better in the future. So if I had to choose today, I’d probably go SMP in black on a bracelet. (The look with the rubber is actually really nice also, just wish it was with a deployant. Cheers.

@Wildcatjames1

5 жыл бұрын

Nicholas Lyristis I agree, the PO to me is a little too ‘showy’ and shiny. But I also feel the new waves are a little too pronounced on the SMP.

@nikony9555

5 жыл бұрын

James the waves are not that bad in person, but I think I’m gonna pass on both. I don’t love the SMP bracelet either. I wanted to like them both more, but they Neither of these speak to me. The search continues. Perhaps a serviced 2500 or 8500 model

@harrysmith3502

5 жыл бұрын

Defo with it looking too shiny!!

Interesting that the 39mm gets more air time than the 43.5 PO. Is that because buyers retain the 43 and buyers of the 39 regret not going large and sell? I love my blue 43.5, but also love my old SM120. I could keep them both and get the two tone SMP300 on rubber. Now that’s a nice contrast in the collection.

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

On paper, a 43.5mm diver should be versatile, but the reality is that Omega's Planet Ocean 43.5 specifically wears huge and simply is too thick. Best, Tim

In love with the new Omega 300m😍

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

It's a pretty nice watch to have love for! - WatchBox Team

I have to admit that I had to set the playback speed to 0.85 in order to be comfortable. Other than that, great comparison!

PO all the way for me, but I’m biased. Both fantastic pieces

Tim, thank you for the review. Would you please slow down a bit...I'm rushed all week at work and this just brings back the anxiety...these are luxury pieces but I feel the pace of the review doesn't match...you don't need to revert back to your Woodstock, GA talking pace but a touch slower would be appreciated. Thank you again!

@BeckVMH

5 жыл бұрын

Haha I also noticed the brisk pace. I’ve watched a lot of Tim’s reviews and always enjoy them, to include this one. This due to my specific interest in these watches as well as another great review by Tim. I’m thinking there was maybe a lot to pack in one vid given the comparison and not a trend. Having to focus for this review but was thinking as always, wow, Tim’s just a natural reviewing products. He could review a snail sprinting and make it interesting haha.

@ovidiubgh

4 жыл бұрын

I've held my breath the entire review because of the way he talked 🤭

Thus the PO have nicer elements like the Omega logo, white gold hands and nunerals that fit perfectly with the dial, I choose the SMP 300 (not being influenced by the price, few bucks are not being considered) I find the design of the Diver 300 much more appealing and fresh. The grey dial (which James Bond will present I the next movie) is not the best. The Blue one with brazalete and/or with Sedna gold with blue rubber put the Diver 300 light years away from PO or Submariner, in terms of watch presence and aesthetics... The PO looks very old timer, very 1950’s. But in personal tastes, the most important is your own choose. Considering both have the same caliber also, is a no brainer go for the SMP 300

I went to my AD with full intentions of getting either the PO 39.5mm or the 57’ heritage and ended up pulling on the SMP 300m white dial. Once I tried all of them on the PO and 57’ heritage sat too tall on my wrist. The diver’s bracelet was actually better than I initially thought it would be also. At the end of the day it was the most comfortable and looked best on my wrist. Can’t speak for others obviously.

@Ilestun

2 жыл бұрын

How much discount were you able to get from the AD ?

I like both but still prefer the 43.5 version of the Planet Ocean with the 8900 movement. The adjustable bracelet on the Planet Ocean is fantastic. I would never wear it on a strap

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your feedback Ian! Adjustable bracelets are both stylish & comfortable! Just out of curiosity, why wouldn't you put it on a strap? Strictly preference? - WatchBox Team

@ianwoollard2063

5 жыл бұрын

WatchBox Reviews I prefer the look and feel of a bracelet,the Planet Ocean’s is excellent quality and well designed.

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

@@ianwoollard2063 Point taken, thanks for sharing! - WatchBox Team

I like the old POs.

It’s odd, but as a Seamaster fan-boy, I fully expected to love the new 300, but there’s something about it that just ‘jars’ with me. I’m not a fan of the conical escape valve but more importantly there just seems something wrong to me with the relative proportions. I’m not sure why, but it could be the wave dial. I prefer the more subtle wave of the earlier models and in particular I think this new design, being more pronounced and with a longer wavelength has the effect of making the watch seem broader than it actually may be - a bit like ‘stripes make you look thin, hoops make you look fat’. Have to say however that I haven’t seen it in the flesh yet, so this could just be a function of videos and pictures, so reserve the right to change my mind and fall in love. Another great video, thanks Tim.

@johnpaavo

5 жыл бұрын

I agree. That's why I bought last years Seamster 300 back in June. I prefer the rich blue dial and the traditional helium escape valve. Saying that, if someone gifted me the Seamaster Good Planet in blue, I'd never need another watch!!

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

It's probably the dial. Try one of the less obtrusive dial versions (e.g., gloss blue, gloss black). This model features a chrome-plated dial that's certain to polarize opinion and distinctly shows the depth of the wave cuts. Best, Tim

PO for me at 43.5mm ( I know not the choice here) with the splash of orange otherwise the 300 of these two

@JohnLFjellstad

5 жыл бұрын

Edward Black same for me. I think the PO/Aqua Terra is a fun combo to own

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

The 43.5 does carry a big movement upgrade, so this might be a great alternative if your wrist is on the larger side. Best, Tim

Own the PO. Love it! Strap is water proof.

Why did Omega put a dive watch on a leather strap ?

Where is it mentioned that the Planet Ocean has white gold indices and hands? I own the exact watch in this video and have never heard/seen anything about that online. You've mentioned it a couple of times now and I'm curious which one of us has been misinformed. Thanks!

@Disinf3ctant

5 жыл бұрын

The submariner has white gold indices so I wouldn't be surprised the po has it since it is a direct competitor

@Ramyfication

5 жыл бұрын

@@Disinf3ctant Since writing this comment, I reached out to Omega's spare parts department and they confirmed the indices and hands are steel.

@Disinf3ctant

5 жыл бұрын

@@Ramyfication ah, thanks for doing that! :)

What is the point of liquid metal ???

White gold on the planet ocean?

I personally think they should keep the omega emblem in raised silver not colour coordinated

Tim it's the Omega Planet Ocean 43.5 all day long hands down !!!!!

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Great pick David! - WatchBox Team

Just purchaed the new Seamaster 300 black/bracelet. You measured a lug to lug of 50mm. Omega states it's 48mm and I measured mine and it's 47.5 mm lug to lug. Strange .

@weeksy68

3 жыл бұрын

I have a speedmaster and it’s definitely a few mm longer lug to lug

PLANET OCEAN, ALL DAY, EVERY DAY.

The Omega Seamaster 300 silver dial look so much better in real live. The way it catches and reflects lights 😍 Instant love at first sight.

Planet Ocean would be fantastic with no date. Imagine if that was a proper 3 instead. It would be perfect. Don't like the skeletal hands on the 300m, although the date at 6 (if we're going to have a date, would rather not) is better.

why isnt this a comparison between 43.5 PO and the 42 diver. that would be more appropriate

You state that the planet ocean's numerals are white gold, I can't seem to find any information regarding this, please can you confirm?

@Mike-bw5om

Жыл бұрын

It’s rhodium plated my friend not gold

PO all of the way!! The applied Omega logo in White gold makes a world of difference along with the liquid metal.

My preference is the Planet Ocean

I have a Planet Ocean 600 metre. Perfectly happy with it. No plan to go to lesser model in lineup. Watch looked completely out of place on your wrist. Proportionally far too big.

Ever tried Valium bud .?

Hi Tim, Can you please review a black dial Omega Planet Ocean 8500 in 42mm?

39mm?

Sorry¡! But i think the PO still better by far. Better Bezel. Better Omega logo. Better legibility. I like the numerals, don't like the date at 3, but are better than rolex looked index from the Wawes. And the PO hands are much beautiful (but the new look quite better than the one ceramic model) In my opinion also the new size it's a mistake

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

All good points, but remember that this PO 39.5 also costs $6,450 to $4,750 for the SMP 300M. Best, Tim

Seamaster professional 300 for me

The 2018 Seamaster 300M pulls on my heartstrings more in this case. However, I don't think I can pull it off with very narrow wrists as per your mention. Just curious Tim, what would your vote be if both were on their default bracelets, and the 2018 Seamaster was instead the full blue dial version?

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

I'd choose the bracelet. Unlike the old watch, the end links pivot straight down, so the distance across the wrist is identical for strap and bracelet models. The new clasp has a ton of built-in adjustments, too. Best, Tim

@freefighter277

5 жыл бұрын

@@the1916companywatchreviews thanks Tim! You reckon Omega will ever do a METAS mid size of the Diver 300m?

Can anyone tell me why everyone hates the new 300m? I have a early 2000's 300m (007) that I love. I just picked up the new 300 and think it looks totally refreshed vs the old plain jain 300m. Other than the HE valve, which I don't dislike because of the shape, but the fact that omega claims the shape is necessary for the valve to be opened under water which is complete bs, I freaking love the new 300m!

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Hi Brandon, ignore haters. They tend to make themselves loud and prominent on the Internet. The threads under my videos draw a fairly mature and thoughtful crowd, and you'll see that most of the responses under this video are quite positive in favor of the SMP 300M. Best, Tim

i choose both

The 2018 seamaster is my choice. The wave pathern gives the new model more own charisma. The hands of the old model i like more.

I have the 42mm PO with blue band. It’s a beautiful watch. The 300 seems a bit gimmicky in its presentation.

Strap is waterproof on PO

Man do you ever breathe between sentences...?

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

Breath Control > 9000 - WatchBox Team

@mattchedzey

5 жыл бұрын

He's got to squeeze a lot of info transported on a rather extensive vocabulary into such a short video. Although theres no denying Tim speaks fast; he is the master of doing so and still being 100% comprehensible in the process

@ayrtonnathan6830

4 жыл бұрын

i feel like i'm watching a horse race🤣

The bezel on my 300 doesn’t align perfectly. Although not the end of the world - it does detract from its beauty. Excellent performance. I found resting it on the opposite side of the crown that it only gain 1sec every 6 days which is pretty good!! I think I should have got the 600 as I prefer the wrist presence but I am happy so far - even more so on the Omega NATO 😎

@hipboi894

5 жыл бұрын

You can get it adjusted on omega customer center if it's still prominent to your sight.

Definitely the Seamaster...i think I would buy it on the spot but I haven’t seen it at any AD yet and its December!😡

I love it "I've been dying for this comparison" ... what sorta thing does Tim think about when he's drunk? Oh I know, let's do a comparison on two watches from the same manufacturer! Crazy! I want to see Timmy hammered drunk at a bar, bet he's all "You know, the 50 Fathoms really is the superior watch to your 11660, burp, you know that right, right? Amiright?"

Bootleg Versus FTW!

The ad inserts cover up the lume shot. Annoying as hell. Why not add them AFTER the lume shot?

@nekeke1

5 жыл бұрын

What inserts?. I don't understand.

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

I'm working on that. A separate department from my one-man shop inserts those ads, and I'm going to request that they be withheld from these comparisons. For single-watch videos, I just try to move the watch around where I expect the cards to be. Best, Tim

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

He's referring to advertisement cards at the very end of the videos. Best, Tim

@nekeke1

5 жыл бұрын

@@the1916companywatchreviews Ok. Now I understand that. Thanks so much for your help.

PO has uncomfortably big crown with sharp edge. Imho, the older version of one looks better. SM has cheap looking and big He valve with unpretty gap. Older SM's rubber strap is nicer. I don't understand, why Omega doesn't offer also solid stainless steel back.

@Brian-ee1gx

2 жыл бұрын

The option for a solid back would be nice, and would knock some thickness off the watch.

04:30 wait! the 8800 has no twin barrel!

300m

I was never much of an Omega fan until I saw the new Seamaster. I got the blue dial model. It's clearly a beautifully finished watch. The face, bezel and case are nearly flawless. Better than a Panerai and nicer than a Submariner although it's hard to compete with the iconic and highly distinctive Panerai look. The movement is truly exceptional even if it's not finished as well as my Nomos watches. Overall, a great timepiece.

Having both 300m is much comfortable than PO But PO looks more expensive than 300

Are these movements ETA based?

@STICKYBOY214

5 жыл бұрын

Tynchy Temper No

I really want to like the diver 300m, because it's impressive in every regard. Unfortunately the dial and bezel combo is just a tad bit too busy for my taste; i'll wait for the planet ocean update and come back to this comparison :)

Seamaster 300 all day long!

@the1916companywatchreviews

5 жыл бұрын

We agree; the SMP '25 is hard to beat! Best, Tim

The Seamaster is a great watch but I really don’t like the skeleton hands, I much prefer sword hands for more legible reading on my watches.

So you want the best of these two watches? Get the previous generation diver 300m :D