The problem is corporate greed over quality and safety

@Cookiplayz

3 ай бұрын

Like the guy who worked for Boeing was found dead in his car due to “suicide” . While sueing Boeing for cutting corners . Media dosent talk about it

@Phat737

3 ай бұрын

That’s only half the problem. The other half is they’re DE& I hires that past 5 years at Boeing and all of there suppliers.

@antoniodelgado3036

3 ай бұрын

​@@Phat737???

@ExploringCabinsandMines

3 ай бұрын

Sounds like a repeatable cliche your mom told you.

@JO-bw5wx

3 ай бұрын

Make the elite to fly Boeing like all of usand stop them flying their private plane. Then they will care more.

Airbus headed by an engineer. Boeing headed by an accountant.

@davidstager173

Ай бұрын

A clown

@Jesus_Muslim_

Ай бұрын

@@davidstager173 it's pedophiile Biden's era that is full of corruption, genocide, and impotence.

@Kayla-ey7zg

11 күн бұрын

Airbus has had plenty of issues as well. No company is really prioritizing anything other than money

@Prab-iu6mr

11 күн бұрын

@@Kayla-ey7zg When was the last airbus accident you remember caused by engineering defect or airbus corporate greed rather than human or airline error

@Jesus_Muslim_

11 күн бұрын

@@Kayla-ey7zg Boeing wasn't losing money it's corporate greed

The FAA also needs to be investigated.

@brnmcc01

Ай бұрын

Yeah, there was too many of them on site, and in bed, with Boeing at the plants.

@lordhue

Ай бұрын

It’s not really the FAA at fault. The situation that brought this about isn’t an FAA problem but a congress problem. Congress gave the FAA oversight of the manufacturing Quality Control system and then didn’t give the FAA a budget or man power to do it. If I remember exact numbers, the FAA has less than 10 inspectors in the entire country doing the QC work on this type of thing. Even if those inspectors were robots that never stopped working they aren’t a large enough body to sufficiently check and track every facet of an airliner’s build, maintenance and complete QC status. This is why the worthless self check system came about. This left inspectors with needing to only look at a very minuscule number of aircraft systems.

@ioe12

23 күн бұрын

All of government is irresponsible corrupt all the way down to small town local government this country is turning into Mexico faster than a snowball headed for hell

@kamakaziozzie3038

23 күн бұрын

We will let Biden do that

@inconspicuousalien519

21 күн бұрын

​@lordhue yes the faa is ultimately at fault here

I remember reading a Reddit thread of a former Boeing engineer. He mentioned how the higher ups were firing the engineers who weren’t giving the “go ahead” on certain designs. They’d bring in a new guy that would bend the knee for the corporate overlords. And here we are with planes that aren’t built with absolute precision.

@WhiteWolf-lm7gj

Ай бұрын

And, of course, it's the new guy whose head ends up on the chopping block

@2egenjerry

29 күн бұрын

"So I get a new safety guy"

@Real-talk10167

26 күн бұрын

Those whistle blowers have mysteriously died. These companies are becoming worse than Russia and China. Soon you'll have employees falling out of random windows.

@JacksonWestfall

12 күн бұрын

Same with aircraft maintenance

@BrodyCox

8 күн бұрын

I have a good friend who is now an ex-engineer as well. He was let go for the exact same reason, he wouldn't sign off or give the go-ahead on parts to be shipped because the redundancies on a significant number of the batch tested were inoperable, leaving a servo that controls integral flight components with nothing past a single point of failure. He absolutely refused to stand down, and they took some pretty slimy actions and finally succeeded in getting him fired, using an incredulous outburst he had as a means of claiming he was creating an 'unsafe or hostile work environment.' Meanwhile my buddy is absolutely exasperated and distraught knowing that whoever they replaced him with most likely will just bend down and look the other way, like you said. Hearing his detailed take on it and seeing his frustration and incredulity was honestly pretty heartbreaking.

This is what happens when the FAA allows companies to check their own work

@thadsmith4909

3 ай бұрын

That could work well, assuming that the FAA does audits to verify that the checks are being done properly and thoroughly. Methinks they aren't there yot.

@FreedomLovin

3 ай бұрын

That's actually the exact opposite way to see the problem. The government is in bed with Boeing, FAA will turn the other way and is completely useless in this case where Boeing has a near monopoly, thanks to government playing favorites in the market. Boeing would get CRUSHED if we actually had a free market in air travel. We don't.

@bobbygetsbanned6049

3 ай бұрын

The FAA doesn't have the resources to check Boeing's work...

@buckeyemania09

2 ай бұрын

@@bobbygetsbanned6049 they had the resources before, but they stopped giving Boeing oversight and therefore stopped using money dedicated to giving Boeing more oversight

@karpabla

2 ай бұрын

​@bobbygetsbanned6049 They would have the capability if the Public Administration wanted it. Public regulators always can use whatever means and time is required. And if it is not possible, the product or procedure is not approved until it is achieved. By definition , regulators have to have the upper hand, especially when human safety is in play. Ok, I know that IRL politicians are in the bed with big corporations. (Boeing, Big Pharma,...)

This is what happens when money becomes your priority, not safety or quality

@papatango2362

3 ай бұрын

Or probably because this a fault with Spirit Aerosystems and is being incorrectly blamed on Boeing. Also, stop overreacting. Any system as complex as an airliner will inevitably have faults be exposed later down the line. It is inevitable. Boeing is still very safe. Also why do you not pay attention to fuel tank issues with the A321XLR, paint issues with the A350 or the Pratt & Whitney issues on the A320neo family. Flaws will be discovered and things will break. It is inevitable; and if that concerns you, don’t fly at all.

@sabba5785

3 ай бұрын

@@papatango2362well said bro. Well said 👏

@Jake-1234

3 ай бұрын

​@papatango2362 But the difference is how many issues with Boeing were I'm the past 2 or 3 months compared to the airbus issues. I would say faulty door plugs are more serious than paint jobs, and the a321 xlr is not in service yet.

@Jake-1234

3 ай бұрын

​@papatango2362 However, I do genuinely understand what you are saying as almost all the issues with Boeing aircraft are problems with the assembly which is why Spirit aerosystems should be held accountable but at the same time if there are this many problems surely they would stop manufacturing with spirit aerosystems

@teddythefire

3 ай бұрын

@@papatango2362 Spirt was once a part of Boeing, then split from the company, so the same still applies. The a321XLR isn’t even certified, pick on it when it’s in service. I get your point with the a350 and you can talk bout it, but the 737 has had repeats over and over again, from MCAS to this. Also the P&W issues are completely separate unlike your claim of Boeing and spirt

What we have learned over the years with past plane crashes is that even the tiniest, simplest defects (when ignored or overlooked) can lead to catastrophic failure.

The main problem is the executives moved headquarters away from the engineering site. Engineers were no longer included in the decision making process because of greed, safety took a back seat.

@BlindBiker3

Ай бұрын

The whole problem is the FAA and government. Boeing is not part of the problem, they are who government has decided to target.

@user-yt9id8zq3g

Ай бұрын

I never understood the move

@Lrsk_

Ай бұрын

One question, I'm flying on one soon (737), should I change plane or will it be okay, it is around a 4,4 and a half hour flight?

@newyorkernewjersey

Ай бұрын

@@Lrsk_ wear seatbelts as the doors might fly off :)

@michaelstevens3618

Ай бұрын

@@Lrsk_you will be fine. I’ve flown on them multiple times, and I’ll Fly on them again. Just flew on one in February on American Airlines 4 hour flight. They are honestly quiet and fine. The pilots aren’t going to take off if they don’t feel confident in the aircraft.

And the former Boeing engineer whistle blower also found dead..... just a coincidence?

@tomstarzeck7137

3 ай бұрын

62 years old ..extremely suspicious circumstances..not to mention 30 years with Boeing

@user-nf4sd4ss3o

3 ай бұрын

@@tomstarzeck7137 Appears to be mafia style execution 😳

@hongsienkwee537

3 ай бұрын

According to Boeings algorithm it had nothing to do with them

@jwilson2500

3 ай бұрын

They want it obvious enough to deter any more like him

@billolsen4360

3 ай бұрын

@@user-nf4sd4ss3o Thank YOU, Inspector!

I saw an interview with a Boeing employee that was asked if he would fly on the plane he was building. After a pause he said no.

@edwardfiorvante6123

2 ай бұрын

How would you rate this comment KZread put on your comment. I put EXCELLENT! Then KZread asks WHY with different answer to click. I clicked other! KZread didn’t of course ask to clarify other BECAUSE I WOULD Have PUT……. BECAUSE ITS TRUE!!!! KZread is turning into LIBERAL GARBAGE!!! GARBAGE IN GARBAGE OUT IS WHAT YOUR GET KZread IF YOU HAVE CERTAIN VIEWERS THAT VIEW CERTAIN CHANNELS!!! SO YOUR GONNA GET ANSWERS FROM MOSTLY ONE PERSPECTIVE AND YOU HEN WHAT…….. BAN FREE SPEECH!! HERE YOU GO KZread “I would absolutely not fly a Max airplane,” Ed Pierson, a former senior manager on Boeing's 737 program, told the LA Times. “I've worked in the factory where they were built, and I saw the pressure employees were under to rush the planes out the door.Feb 1, 2024

@KhaledTheSaudiHawkII

2 ай бұрын

Was he the same guy who got suicided?

@mrock828

2 ай бұрын

@@KhaledTheSaudiHawkII I don't know, the interview I saw was from 7 or 8 years ago, a while back. I guess employees have been concerned about build quality for years now.

@SampsonGG

2 ай бұрын

Yea and the pause was only theatrical to reinforce the idea that they had thought long and hard about it All of the people working on these planes from top to bottom have said for years that they won't fly on them. There was no thinking required to answer that question

@mrock828

2 ай бұрын

@@SampsonGG nope, you are correct..... He knew his answer.

I remember when people didn't want to fly on an Airbus because of reliability issues. How times have changed.

@alanhinkel420

Ай бұрын

And it will eventually go back to Airbus. That’s how it works. I don’t have any issue flying Boeing. The chance of anything happening, slim. Even if the spoiler deployed. It’s not going to lead to a crash unless the pilots are asleep.

@Annii_Oakley_

Ай бұрын

@@alanhinkel420 Or you’re 60 feet off of the ground… 🫤 #SorryPete #AirCanada621 #DC8

@robloxiasquad672

Ай бұрын

​@@alanhinkel420 What about a open Door ? I dont think someone can save you from that

@djdelarosa25

Ай бұрын

​@@alanhinkel420 Found the Boeing exec

@alanhinkel420

Ай бұрын

@@robloxiasquad672 What about an open door? You have to include context.

It's not poor quality control.. It's criminal negligence.

You missed the opportunity to name the video something like "spoiler alert: another problem for the max 9"

@KwakuAddoDanquah

3 ай бұрын

I mean, you won’t get another great opportunity than this 😂😂😂

@jantjarks7946

3 ай бұрын

Oh, it's Boeing after all, they sure will deliver more opportunities. ... nvm.

@EuropeanRailfanAlt

3 ай бұрын

It's a problem with all MAX variants

@juliemanarin4127

3 ай бұрын

Lol!!! Good one!

@user-yo3vt7ft1p

3 ай бұрын

Good one!

Well looks like the Boeing 737 MAX is the DC-10 of the 21st century.

@Cynderfan35

3 ай бұрын

legit same case: plane that tries to kill you every time you fly it

@lrg3834

3 ай бұрын

The MAX has had more issues than the 10. They fixed the 10. The verdict is still out on the MAX.

@patton303

3 ай бұрын

It’s way worse. Most of the DC-10’s problems were engine issues. But it was a solid and reliable airframe.

@Gan596

3 ай бұрын

​@@patton303the cargo doors would have disagreed

@Michael-sb8jf

3 ай бұрын

Both designed by brought to you by Mcdonald Douglas Edit McDonnell for some reason auto corrected to McDonald's I think it fits better

Risking hundreds of passenger’s safety to save $415 is wild to think about. A lot of tickets on the plane are much higher than that

@televishenimoniker5546

4 күн бұрын

It is wild enough that it doesn't even make sense monetarily. I don't get it.

How any aircraft manufacturer can skimp on safety is truly reprehensible. The FAA and US government needs to have a thorough inquiry into how Boeing handles its business.

@cooking_phil

Ай бұрын

FAA and US government are already heavily involved in the whole process....

@Plathianloner

Ай бұрын

The FAA and Boeing are in bed together. Nothing can be accomplished.

If it's Boeing, I'm not going.

@steveo601

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Calebs_Aviation

3 ай бұрын

Me too! 😊

@TPB-OPA

3 ай бұрын

If it's airbus, you must.

@shahriar4526

3 ай бұрын

Just if it’s a max 777 -300ER 747 737 757 are capable aircrafts

@shantiboiii

3 ай бұрын

Wow never heard that response before.

Well, I don’t know what the problem is. I mean missing doors, falling off wheels, spoilers deploying accidentally, just a normal day at the office…

@rais1953

3 ай бұрын

And sudden diving towards the Tasman Sea throwing 50 passengers to the roof...

@Zwaolin

3 ай бұрын

You forgot the unpredictable autopilot, because the engines were too large.

@jasono2139

3 ай бұрын

...and today a panel "just fell off" a 737 departing San Francisco. 🤦

@yewenyi

3 ай бұрын

You know, I was always told that flying is dangerous. Boeing are just out to prove it.

@rais1953

3 ай бұрын

@@jasono2139 Was that a MAX?

This corporate greed is ruining America in all aspects.

“I don’t always fly in a Boeing airplane, but when I do, I always bring my own toolbox onboard” - every most interesting person in the world.

@charliec5653

20 күн бұрын

You should bring a parachute instead.

@Phamyunx

17 күн бұрын

@@charliec5653 well, I want to save lives and the world!

Not as dangerous as whistle blowing.

@gdok6088

3 ай бұрын

Yeah, the guy said if he died it wouldn't be suicide. He died the next day.

@jokuvaan5175

3 ай бұрын

Former quality manager or something. Has been speaking against Boeing for 7 years and trying to get them accountable. He finally succeeded in getting a court case and is found dead the day before his testimony in court

@LEON.1717

2 ай бұрын

@@gdok6088 Move along, nothing to see here. …..

Yeah honestly they should scrap the whole fucking plane, start again from scratch, and never give it the max name ever again

@jantjarks7946

3 ай бұрын

4 missing bolts on an old plane design is different from 4 missing bolts on a new clean sheet plane design? The door plugs have been around since the 707, the technology is proven to be safe. It only became a safety hazard due to Boeing's subterranean safety standards. The 33 product audits failed from 89 speaks volumes about Boeing's unfixable unsafety culture. The 787 was just the beginning from what we see now as a result.

@aycc-nbh7289

3 ай бұрын

@@jantjarks7946And what about Airbus’s issues such as those with its landing gears or fuel tanks? How come the spotlight is on Boeing so much?

@jantjarks7946

3 ай бұрын

aycc-nbh - Should I start with the criminal conspiracy with the MAX crashes until today of what is happening with Boeing's? It's already difficult to get a comprehensive list together already how Boeing cannot get its act together. 2024 was supposed to be a good year for Boeing, that worked out... And the list is about certified planes. Unlike the Airbus, where the EASA is doing its job without cosy relationships in politics or Boeing's FAA. As such, why are you even raising the fuel tank redesign? That's exactly what a certification is about, to find safety concerns. Do you really want me to point at the 777X certification process so badly? Let me guess, Boeing's FAA couldn't find any safety concerns before certification of any Boeing plane? The latest issue with a certified Boeing plane seems to be the inability of Boeing to exchange a simple switch since 2017, when the issue with the 787 pilot seats popped up first. Instead LATAM had to deal with it and more than 50 people injured. Does Boeing always have to wait until finally an incident happens before getting its act together?

@aycc-nbh7289

3 ай бұрын

⁠@@jantjarks7946What do you mean by EASA having no relation with Airbus? It would only be in their rational self-interest to have one with them, since harming one of the two major passenger airplane manufacturers in the world would mean they would be collecting less money from overflight fees and other fees related to airports and air travel. I’m raising the fuel tank design because it would only mean Airbus is not designing the safest aircraft they can and they are facing just as significant of problems as Boeing or at least somewhere in the ballpark. And wasn’t the area that B787 flew over known for being turbulent to begin with? An A330 also experienced something similar recently, so it may not have been something related to the aircraft.

@jantjarks7946

3 ай бұрын

@@aycc-nbh7289 There are enough aeroplane businesses building jets which will pay overflight fees, no need to cozy up like Boeing's FAA. And you are raising the fuel tank design as it's the only way to deflect from Boeing's unsafety culture and the criminal conspiracy they committed. Fun fact, Airbus is addressing it within the framework of the certification process, like any other aeroplane producer has to do it. Boeing is addressing its issues with criminal conspiracies and serious air travel incidents instead. You deflecting with Airbus shows how weak your argument really is. Just for your information, the DoJ has launched another criminal investigation into Boeing. As such, no one comes even close to the criminal behavior of Boeing. And a faulty switch on pilot seats, that should have been reworked since 2017, has nothing to do with turbulence. You asked why the spot light is on Boeing and you got your answer. Now it's up to you to accept reality or not.

If it's Boeing, i ain't going

@gjustg1540

7 күн бұрын

Yawn. You're not going anywhere anyway, if you flew you'd realise you have zero choice in what equipment you fly on. Tool.

This is what happens when the engineer CEO of Boeing gets replaced with an accountant.

POV:When you hire a business man to be the ceo of an ENGINEERING firm. This is exactly how McDonnell Douglas fell.

@billstrasburg384

2 ай бұрын

How could an engineer possibly operate as a CEO? Did that actually make sense in your head before you typed it out for the entire internet to see? What do you think CEOs do, sit on the computer running CAD/CAM software all day?

@firstlegoleague8

2 ай бұрын

@@billstrasburg384 your stupidity is absolutely astonishing, look no further then Nvidia's CEO, my father is also another example. there is no "bachelor of CEO". the arrogance you exude whilst being simultaneously wrong is actually mind numbing. please take your own advice "Did that actually make sense in your head before you typed it out for the entire internet to see?"

@Naijsim

2 ай бұрын

@@billstrasburg384 No, but at least the decisions an honest engineering ceo makes, will come from a place of expertise. Besides, haven't you ever seen an engineering graduate with a degree in business administration???

@feonor26

2 ай бұрын

​@@billstrasburg384Do you honestly think a engineer can't be a CEO?? Former CEO of BP Oil is an engineer. My friend who is the CEO of his own company with 100 employees is an engineer.

@g.i.520

2 ай бұрын

🎉

Im going to take a flight: 😄 Its a boeing plane: 🙂 Its the 737: 😰 max.: 💀

@lon3don

3 ай бұрын

Stay home

@richard--s

3 ай бұрын

Didn't they say, they removed the word "max", for some reasons? ;-) So, when it's a 737-8 or 737-9, we know what it is... ;-)

@BlindBiker3

3 ай бұрын

Government is the problem.

@bebop34

3 ай бұрын

Lol 🤣

@koharumi1

3 ай бұрын

Nah more like: It is a Boeing plane: 😨 It is a 737: 😰 Max: 💀

“If it’s Boeing, we’re not going” is my family’s motto.

My brother in law retired B52 pilot now flies the Max and according to him no problems. He has flown AB and loves both .

@PtolemiosFrost

3 күн бұрын

Just good luck and a matter of time. He'd be better off sticking with Airbus. Still though, I hope he never has any problems with any plane he flies.

Pilots are gonna be getting spoiler alerts pretty soon

@marcariotto1709

3 ай бұрын

That's a good one😂😂😂😂

@jamesbennett3521

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@collinsmwaura1833

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@SaveAmerica492

2 ай бұрын

😂🤣😂🤣 Bravo!!

Massive lawsuits is the only thing these profiteers understand. Sue them into bankruptcy!

Ай бұрын

Boeing will always be propped up but US government. There is no chance they will go bankrupt

@Gstv76

Ай бұрын

LOL Boeing brings in billions of dollars a year. Not going to work!

@TheAllMightyGodofCod

Ай бұрын

Will you pay for the workers salary? Because a lot of people are going to loose their jobs if Boeing fails. Don't get me wrong, I am not a fan of Boeing but surely there is a middle ground between this and " sueing to bankruptcy"... I mean, Airbus is doing fine, having profit and doing safe planes.

@steveweidig5373

Ай бұрын

They won't understand because it's just the company that gets the lawsuit. It simply doesn't affect the suits, and if it does, then just in the shape of a golden parachute. How about making the executives personally accountable (as in, they have to pay for the damages, not the company they ruined, plus jail time), then they would learn

@mrmeeseeks8453

Ай бұрын

Well someone's gotta make military aircraft

"poor quality control" B-17: I'm not poor quality

Southwest just had another issue just yesterday where they were flying DANGEROUSLY low over cities and houses. It said they were flying only 500' over people's houses. They said this is the 2nd time it has happened since April where another Southwest plane was flying only 450' over the ocean..

That's 5 scandals just for the 737. We've got rudder hardovers, MCAS, panels falling off, engine failures, and now this.

@gravethebeyond

2 ай бұрын

just five more. and I got bingo.

@mostbeautifulroads9789

2 ай бұрын

What about the engine anti-ice that can't be turned on for more than 5 minutes or the engines take damage? (Okay that's probably the engine manufacturers fault but still ...)

@Gantiz

Ай бұрын

And 2 dead whistleblowers

@Gantiz

Ай бұрын

My brother works on those engines. It's the mount that's the problem, made by Boeing.

@shellyrgarcia2205

Ай бұрын

omg the MCAS...that was crazy.

They just can’t seem to get it right

@henryairconcepts2999

3 ай бұрын

Let China make it right 😂

@TheOzthewiz

3 ай бұрын

The "Dreamliner" is turning into a "Nightmare"!

@michaeldunham3385

3 ай бұрын

​@@TheOzthewizdifferent aircraft

@postersm7141

3 ай бұрын

Yeah, and now they found the whistleblower dead shot in the head in a hotel parking lot before he was getting ready to testify. Yeah cause that’s not suspicious at all.

@Mr1121628

3 ай бұрын

@@postersm7141I mean it could still easily be explainable as suicide. Almost every family ever when interviewed following a loved one’s suicide says “oh they were doing so well. They never would have killed themselves.” So that’s not very unique. Also it’s not like this guy was the lynchpin to finding Boeing responsible. Their stock price has tanked due to all the incidents and recalls and whatnot. It wouldn’t make much sense to murder the guy at this point.

I’ve logged hundreds of hours in the Max 8 and haven’t had a single problem. Very nice machine.

@chuckwain5591

Ай бұрын

Yea it is fashionable to knock Boeing and the 737, I guess it generates clicks. I see lots of issues on the news that are "Boeing" problems that are actually poor maintenance or other manufacturers issues. Example if there is an engine problem on a Boeing aircraft it is not Boeing's fault, Boeing does NOT build engines. Wheels falling off, maybe the airline mechanics that serviced the aircraft should be scrutinized .

@konkerouf

Ай бұрын

@@chuckwain5591 they are the ones assembling and selling the plane. Final QC round falls on them

@Chevyman02

Ай бұрын

​@@konkeroufit's just like buying a new truck, alot of the truck manufacturers don't build their own powertrains(engines, transmissions, rear-ends). You have a problem, you take it to the dealership and blame the truck manufacturer, but it's actually who built the components that broke.

@lillianmacaluso469

Ай бұрын

​@@konkeroufwrong! Aircraft manufacturing is totally different than automotive. They build the plane and you purchase your choice of engines like RollsRoyce, GE, Pratt&whitney etc if the engine blows up in flight Boeing has absolutely nothng to do.

@LexDiamonzz

Ай бұрын

Thats because you have the Showroom Edition those never have issues.

The in flight spoilers will come up in flight in both the NG and the MAX if the yolk is turned sufficiently to do so. It is normal.

@michaelhamilton8359

20 күн бұрын

Val 👋😂

I swear we waiting for another disaster to happen before someone actually takes action

@juliemanarin4127

3 ай бұрын

Yes ...money. money money

@BlindBiker3

3 ай бұрын

Government needs to get out of it, and then Boeing can fix it as they should, If there even is a problem, government causes the problem with the regulations. Government just needs to get out of it, let the people who know how to build planes ,BUILD PLANES. Boeing is a fantastic American company.

@BlindBiker3

3 ай бұрын

@@juliemanarin4127 it’s not about money, it’s about power prestige in control the government employees want so badly, every FAA worker, as well as Joe Biden. They should all be held personally liable for the issues that they have caused.

@ED-es2qv

3 ай бұрын

​@@BlindBiker3government is not stopping Boeing from making a good plane. You're nuts.

@BlindBiker3

3 ай бұрын

@@ED-es2qv that’s not nuts, ITS TRUTH! All it takes is to put the nightly news on to see the government and government employees are working against the people again, they always do. In this case, Boeing is a great American company who makes planes right, and they are trying to do their job, but FAA and FAA employees have decided that they don’t want Boeing anymore, they want boeing out of existence, and the employees done away with, FAA employees. Don’t want a prosperous America, they don’t want America to exist. In my own life, government has been very abusive, I live it every day, they are Heynis abusive evil sinister people. and all FAA employees failed America. FAA doesn’t know how to build airplanes, Boeing does, and they do it well. It’s government regulation the blocks them from making fantastic product, if any problem, and since the product is regulated, if something goes wrong, the FAA in regulators and employees should be at fault personally as well as Joe Biden personally. Boeing is a great company, let freedom fly.

Every plane of that type should be grounded until recertification by the FAA.

@emaro6095

3 ай бұрын

The only problem with that is, the FAA let's boeing certify their own planes. In a lot of ways, the FAA is just as guilty.

@garrnk

3 ай бұрын

​@@emaro6095yeah that got changed faa took that away from them.

@floridaheat305

3 ай бұрын

They will just keep giving the FAA money under the table to cover it up

@MrNordpole

2 ай бұрын

It takes 5-6 weeks to do a big check for a plane by a team of people. Almost Everything is taken out, whole inside, walls too, parts of the outside panels. Everything where cables, motors and electrical is going. Engines too. It happens after a big number of hour and landings. It’s really something impressive to see. So imagine they have to do 1500 planes, you need 1/2 year and over 1000 certified people I guess?

@BigAngryPhil

2 ай бұрын

Ignorant

They’re called Speed Brakes, and they’re meant to be deployed in flight to slow the plane down, there is an “ARM” Feature when it sees certain parameters they deploy anyway I don’t see what the big deal is 🙈

@michaelhamilton8359

20 күн бұрын

Arm is for the ground spoiler feature for landing, they auto deploy, but irregardless of the handle position, it is true they are supposed to deploy little bits, especially at slower speeds, to help maintain roll control, where normal aileron use could bring the wing undesirably close to a stall or are generally just less effective due to not enough airflow

Sad that Boeing ruined the 737. The 737-300 (w/efis) were EXCELLENT and considered the "Sports Car of Commercial Jets".

@charliec5653

20 күн бұрын

Absolutely. The 737 was noted for being an excellent aircraft. It's a shame that Boeing is going down the crapper.

"If it's Boeing, I'm not going."

@milesaway3699

2 ай бұрын

Original

amazing how the 737-x00 planes are just better than the 737 maxes in literally every possible way

@noahd.4551

3 ай бұрын

@@nickshawn11 It's not? The 737-400 already exists. It was part of the second generation of 737s.

@midcenturymoldy

3 ай бұрын

@@nickshawn11 “The 737-400 design was launched in 1985 to fill the gap between the 737-300 and the 757-200, and competed with the Airbus A320 and McDonnell Douglas MD-80. It stretched the 737-300 another 10 ft (3.05 m) to carry up to 188 passengers.[13] It included a tail bumper to prevent tailscrapes during take-off (an early issue with the 757), and a strengthened wing spar. The prototype rolled out on January 26, 1988, and flew for the first time on February 19, 1988. The aircraft entered service on September 15, 1988, with launch customer Piedmont Airlines (25 aircraft ordered). The last two Boeing 737-400s, the last Boeing 737 Classics, were delivered to CSA Czech Airlines on February 28, 2000. The 737-400 was replaced by the 737-800 in the Boeing 737 Next Generation family.” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_Classic

@nickshawn11

3 ай бұрын

@@noahd.4551 it appears I was misinformed, thanks for the correction

@EuropeanRailfanAlt

3 ай бұрын

Give me a 737-800 over a 737 MAX 8 anyday

@UltimateSeduction

3 ай бұрын

Any x00 over the max. I'll even fly an old 707 or 727 when it's maintained well over any max series.

- After takeoff checklist please - Landing Gear? - Retracted - Flaps? - Up, no lights - Spoilers? - Deployed - WHAT?? - What?

Let's not forget that the MAX is the first 737 to get digital controls over the spoilers. I'm concerned now.

That's not a problem, it's a feature. It scares the crap out of the pilots so they don't dare to fall asleep in the cockpit.

@donfisher8035

3 ай бұрын

Black humor is oddly appropriate.

@TSERJI

3 ай бұрын

lol

@ElAye

2 ай бұрын

😂

I studied flight safety in college. Today, it's all about Boeing, but we are rarely told about all other plane issues due to shoddy maintenance or design. Believe me, they happen, just not shown on the news in the united states.

@thestruggler3338

Ай бұрын

did you pass the course?

Funny thing is the pilots are happy to fly them.

@ACPilot

Ай бұрын

Yes, I am..

For the first time in my life Imma start checking what planes I fly on, and this one along with all other Boeings less than 20 years old are de facto excluded

@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823

2 ай бұрын

"Fewer," and these are new planes

@donnamauer3215

2 ай бұрын

​@@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823 Less than is fine. There was nothing to correct here. Grow up.

@ACPilot

Ай бұрын

😂

I don't think they will ever recover from this kind of PR damage.

@someoneoutoftheinternet1392

2 ай бұрын

I think id be possible, if they get their shit done correctly and then just fade in the backround for some time. I think Boeing in general public would start to sound great again by itself because of litteral decades of building great planes, that shoud at least in my opinnion still be in the minds of quite a few people long terme. But i do not want to say it doesent hurt Boeing and it will take jears witout any mayor problems.

@ACPilot

Ай бұрын

The airlines know more about the realities than an average person reading gossip news.. luckily..

This is what happens when the management is done by marketers rather than engineers.

Spoilers are not to slow the plane down. When spoilers are up, they do create drag which does slow the plane, however, pilots use spoilers to lower a plane’s altitude without pointing the nose down and increasing speed. The spoilers, spoil the air flow over the wings which decrease lift.

When the CEO is not an engineer………….

@bobbygetsbanned6049

3 ай бұрын

CEO isn't a technical position, it's a business position. You obviously don't understand how companies work.

@iancormie9916

3 ай бұрын

Bean counters and investor reps should not be on corporate boards. Boards should only be interested in long term corporate health - not investor relations.

@tomrogers9467

3 ай бұрын

@@bobbygetsbanned6049 Doesn’t seem to be working very well for Boeing, does it!

@billstrasburg384

2 ай бұрын

​@@bobbygetsbanned6049 This guy is another angry hippie socialist who thinks that businessmen just sit around in gentlemens' lounges smoking cigars all day. He sounds like Alexandria Occasional-Cortex.

@felixx321

2 ай бұрын

@@iancormie9916 This 100%. Then you might argue why we've allowed institutional finance to chop up and extract so much wealth from these companies that provide so much for our everyday lives.

I wish there was a follow up!!! The problem was corrected on the only one it affected the Max 9 with a 20 min software update

Being a 737 pilot, I haven’t heard of a “spoiler issue”. News to me bud

Is this by design? For years limited issues. Now every week. Explosions all over. Bridges coming down. Food plays destroyed one after another. Etc etc. unbelievable friends

Poor Airbus, they need to build another A32N plant. Boeing is just selling too much Airbus Jets

@aycc-nbh7289

3 ай бұрын

You’re aware that Airbus has its own issues as well, no?

@lachmowe1642

3 ай бұрын

Yes Airbus has big problems no doubt but let's be serious, Boeing is just in a FAR worse state currently. Even the usual quite pro Boeing FAA does acknowledge that Boeing is in an horrible situation

@aycc-nbh7289

3 ай бұрын

@@lachmowe1642Maybe because they are being subjected to a lower standard.

@HazardFutBol

3 ай бұрын

​@@aycc-nbh7289they are corrupt now,they care about money more than safety of people riding it

Coby, chill out! You saw what they did to the whistle blower 😂

Something folks don't talk about, many of these planes sat in storage for years before being delivered.

Today, I just came back from an overseas business trip. My outbound journey started with a 787 (1.5 hour journey) and 350 (10 hour flight). The 350 was so quiet it felt gliding. The return flight was on 350 and 737max. Thank goodness I did not know about my last leg on a Boeing max, otherwise I would be thinking about the whole time, that I how much I trust Boeing.

My friends were recently heading back from a class trip when suddenly their plane rolled out of nowhere during cruise. As the plane nerd in the group, they were wondering what happened, but I had no clue, since nothing like that had happened before on any of the flights I’ve ever been on. Now I know.

@ACPilot

Ай бұрын

Can also be wake turbulence from another plane. Airbus’s made me spill my coffee a few times, suddenly our 737 just rolled, Airbus A319 in front. Tried this a few times..

@michaelhamilton8359

20 күн бұрын

Yes, just came here to say more likely wake turbulence, that is relatively common and the most likely scenario

Apparently kayak allows you to filter your search results by aircraft type.

"Safety is a priority here at boeing💀💀💀"

Sorry to inform you, but spoilers are NOT used for stealing, they are used exclusively for slowing down the plane. It's the ailerons that control bank angle, the elevator that controls pitch, and the rudder that controls yaw.

as an American, specifically from Detroit, I pride myself on my country’s manufacturing capabilities. American car manufacturers decided to make cheaper cars and foreign cars have come in and taken a large chunk of their marketshare. Would hate to see Boeing lose their grip on aircraft manufacturing but I’m afraid that is what we are witnessing

@jonathonhazelton2060

2 ай бұрын

Air bus monopoly

@ralfnorenberg3130

2 ай бұрын

greetings from germany

@snotwurfit

2 ай бұрын

Correct. Airbus are going to become the world's leader

@SaveAmerica492

2 ай бұрын

With all of the safety issues surrounding Boeing in the past decade, they lost their grip a long time ago. And certainly don’t deserve getting it back any time soon.

@dakotarobert7975

2 ай бұрын

I saw this coming back in 1991 then it becomes a reality when McD/Douglas took over.

Safety is a priority here at Boeing.😂😂

@Eruma_27

3 ай бұрын

Source: trust me bro

@paulperry7091

3 ай бұрын

Yes, right after profits, the number one priority.

Why are they called spoilers? Because when your plane rolls unexpectedly it spoils your day! 😢

@ACPilot

Ай бұрын

Because they spoil airflow..

It’s terrifying waiting every day for the next disaster to happen, knowing one of us may be the victim.

Boeing should use this to their advantage. They should show a photo of Everest and remind us that we climb for the adventure, for the risk. Show a photo of a roller coaster going down, and remind us why we ride it. Remind us why we watch horror movies. "Ride Boeing. Any other plane is just a ride. But with Boeing, it isn't just your destination. No, ON BOEING the thrill is the GOING!

@paulhough5941

3 ай бұрын

You’re living in a strange world and you’re talking utter bollocks.

@HazardFutBol

3 ай бұрын

Shut up kid

@HazardFutBol

3 ай бұрын

Boeing fan boy 🤓🤓🤓

@JosephBoxmeyer

3 ай бұрын

​@@paulhough5941Sorry if this subtlety seems excessive, but this was my attempt at being factitious.

@Celisar1

2 ай бұрын

You could have a great career in advertising! That one is really good!

Boeing has more recalls than my Kia

@paulperry7091

3 ай бұрын

At least the Kia can't fall out of the road.

@rollingbalegar7341

2 ай бұрын

​@@paulperry7091facepalm

@DarshAnimates

2 ай бұрын

movement that expires.

car manufacturers issue recalls for every little problem , but airliner manufacturers try to hide major issues

Boeing need to fix this crap .... They're responsible for people's lives and people trust them

Guess that previous short of treating Boeing unfairly didn’t age well😬

@zanzabar7878

3 ай бұрын

Hahahahaha thank you!

@aycc-nbh7289

3 ай бұрын

I don’t see why, since the information there still holds true.

@billolsen4360

3 ай бұрын

Don't be one of those people who is only influenced by the last person they heard from

@animegamingdude

3 ай бұрын

nothing he said in that short was untruthful

@JETZcorp

3 ай бұрын

This is why we need to think with more sophistication. It's not just a matter of "Boeing Bad" or "Boeing Good." They are at fault for a bunch of things, but not everything. You don't have to lie to make Beoing look bad.

I’ve been saying after the door- check EVERY bolt and EVERY wire but these planes continue to fly. Keep rolling the dice. The shareholders approve.

@JETZcorp

3 ай бұрын

The shareholders are getting bent over a barrel, lol. You think people are buying up Boeing stock? These decisions are BAD for making money.

When flying the 737 MAX every flight could be your FINAL one.

I haven’t flown in a plane in the last five years. I do not miss it.

Thank god in Europe I can easily choose for an airline flying Airbusses.

@papatango2362

3 ай бұрын

You shouldn’t fly at all. You should also be concerned about your A321XLR having fuel tank issues.

@AverageNoob69

3 ай бұрын

​@@papatango2362the A321XLR isn't even in service yet 😂

@teddythefire

3 ай бұрын

@papatango2362 wait till it’s certified to worry about safety

@Your_Local_Nerd

3 ай бұрын

i thought you said airbussy for a second 💀

@Your_Local_Nerd

3 ай бұрын

@@papatango2362i mean as an american, we should probably worry about our problems with the 737 MAX before judging others i’m a huge boeing fan, but it’s clear that between the A320 family and the 737 family, the A320 might be a little superior when it comes to safety and public records

Can’t wait for the press to pick this up

@ZootoursUK

3 ай бұрын

They are gonna live this

@govols1995

3 ай бұрын

and risk being su*cided in their hotel rooms?

@johnhaller5851

3 ай бұрын

It's not a new problem, and airlines already had to look for problems in all their MAX airplanes last summer. This is just the approved airworthiness directive to permanently fix the problem.

@billolsen4360

3 ай бұрын

@@johnhaller5851 All the drama in narration added by Airbus

@1bluetoe

3 ай бұрын

​@billolsen4360 believe it or not Airbus and Boeing collaborate on safety. I doubt either company would run campaigns to badmouth the other.

I think there have been more than enough red flags now for me to decide NEVER to fly the max

Riding on a MAX while it initiates a barrel roll... I'll pass

@billolsen4360

3 ай бұрын

What, you don't like excitement and surprises?

@derheeheehee6941

3 ай бұрын

The proper term is aileron roll.

@KrystalLogan-ki2yb

3 ай бұрын

@@derheeheehee6941 True.but still nothing remotely worth experiencing on that family trip to Disneyland with kids in tow.... CRINGE

It’s time to ground these planes until a full investigation is done and all complaints especially those from the individuals that worked at Boeing is resolved‼️If a worker that made these Aircraft’s feel unsafe to fly on them why would the general public 🤬

THIS is why I preferred cable links to flight control tabs for controls. And cables made the DC-9 a mean motor scooter. The most fun commercial aircraft I ever flew, for 4k of my 17k.

It’s like what happened to Mercedes Benz, originally the cars were built with a “cost is no concern” mentality and the finest engineering was employed, and then you go into the 2000s and they just took a dump

I’m not flying on any airline that uses the max airplane family at this point.

@aycc-nbh7289

3 ай бұрын

What if your flight gets cancelled and you’re forced to book with another airline?

Remember those students forced to learn "The New Math" a while ago? You know, the math where it isn't important if you get the right answer as long as you understand the concept? Well, they have graduated and are now building airplanes at Boeing!!!

@gotminnam

3 ай бұрын

Best comment ever😂

@foxymetroid

3 ай бұрын

It's not the engineers so much as it's the suits rushing out new planes before their known problems can be fixed.

@aimeewank7859

3 ай бұрын

I had no idea about that but i struggled in math all my life. I would get the right answer but my formulas were all goofy or something. So I kept failing cause my work was wrong but my answers were right, how tf does that make sense? Not til college that I was diagnosed with a learning disability in math only. Maybe I’m a “new genius” in reality! 😂😂😂 anyway, thanks for this, gonna look into it. ✌🏽🙃👍🏽

@jjreider8668

2 ай бұрын

Someone doesn’t understand how math works…

@foxymetroid

2 ай бұрын

It can be argued that understanding the concept is more important than simply answering some questions right.

Meanwhile my airline is like “let’s get more max 8s! 🥳”

You would think they would've learned their lesson back when the rudders on previous gen 737s would just randomly hardover to one side, causing several catastrophic accidents and near misses.

Bro the southwest b737 you showed in the vid was a b737-800 not max

@billolsen4360

3 ай бұрын

Click baiter don't care about accuracy, they're just greedy.

@user-fq6os1ub2v

3 ай бұрын

@@billolsen4360 yes I agree

@derheeheehee6941

3 ай бұрын

He's an idiot.

@daves2624

2 ай бұрын

So there's NO spoiler issue?

Cancel the program

@SIX_GAMES001

3 ай бұрын

Yep I agree

@PreCeptorBR

3 ай бұрын

they can't cancel the program since it's already flying💀

@Your_Local_Nerd

3 ай бұрын

@@PreCeptorBRthey mean cancel production and the 737 MAX 7 and -10 aren’t in public service yet, so they can cancel that

@marcbrady7241

3 ай бұрын

@@Your_Local_NerdGiven the amount of orders they have especially for the MAX 8, it won’t be cancelled.

@5Down1Up

3 ай бұрын

Forget about the program. Cancel Boeing as a whole

I flew in a 737 Max and it was one of the most comfortable flights I have ever taken. Turbulence was not felt.

I'd rather read about these simple defects rather than fatal accidents. We've come a long way, yet still have more to go.

This happened A few times and has since been rectified.. It was a solenoid problem that would freeze while at altitude but would not show signs when inspected..not recent

This isn’t strictly a Boeing problem in their defense, I personally think they should go out of business, but the FAA needs to be punished severely also

Haha this video just answered your questions about whether Boeing getting bad press for nothing. You just made a video saying they receiving bad press and it’s not their fault. This video proves otherwise 🤦🏾‍♂️

@aycc-nbh7289

3 ай бұрын

But they still received blame for maintenance issues and an issue with another manufacturer’s plane.

@douglasdonatien7044

3 ай бұрын

@@aycc-nbh7289 As they should, at the end of the day, it’s Boeing that has its name on it and they sell it to the airlines without proper oversight so…they should be blamed

@JETZcorp

3 ай бұрын

Good lord. NO ONE ever said they got bad press for nothing. They got bad press for things they did wrong, AND they got bad press for things that weren't actually their fault. BOTH are true. If you have a Ford Pinto, you can be mad at Ford about the fuel tank defect. You can't be mad at Ford because your Michelin tire went flat. But in today's world, for some deranged reason, we take these binary views where if something is deemed bad, ONLY negative things can be said about them, even if untrue. Have a milligram of nuance, for once in your freaking lives.

Activation of the spoilers could indeed be catastrophic during critical phases such as decision heights and flare. However, if the aircraft has sufficient altitude and the horizontal stabilizers can recalibrate, it might be manageable. The key concern is ensuring spoilers do not deploy during critical phases of flight where immediate control is crucial.

If it ain’t an Airbus, then your plane is sus

Bro boeing is my favorite aircraft type seeing this is sad asf

@samoray7809

3 ай бұрын

Same bro 😢

@baekhyunexofan747

3 ай бұрын

I think boeing needs new rewiring system for the whole plane now

@samoray7809

3 ай бұрын

@@baekhyunexofan747 I agree... they should remake the 737 or replace it with the 797

@baekhyunexofan747

3 ай бұрын

Would that be a 747 replacement I mean 747 my fav plane

@samoray7809

3 ай бұрын

@@baekhyunexofan747 the 777x is the 747 replacement

The important thing is that they checked all the DEI boxes on their new hires the past couple years.

I am a TSA Officer in a large airport in Texas, words of advice DONT FLY UNLESS ITS A MEDICAL EMERGENCY OR FAMILY DEATH! Vacation is not worth your life TRUST ME! Ive seen Mechanics in the employee Bus forget to put parts on a plane, they have it in their work gear pockets and say " Oops " REALSTORY!

It's so wild...Boeing used to be the plane we trusted most!!

American can never say anything about Chinese manufacturing when we have plan that are literally falling out of the sky.

@Eruma_27

3 ай бұрын

Yeah that right is for us Europeans only now you’re right

@steuererhoehung

2 ай бұрын

Nooo please be fair. As a fan of Airbus I would trust Boing a 1000 times over cheap chinese build crap

@polyverse1

2 ай бұрын

@@steuererhoehung what Chinese built planes are failing like Boeing? I’ll wait and you can barely name any American made thing because America doesn’t make anything and the few things it does make is crap!