I wish you taught me mathematics at high school. All my teachers failed to show the beauty of mathematics and do so in a way that was engaging.

11:35 is also a crucial realization, that often in these types of problems with a random number of people, 15 in this case, it is a redundant piece of information; a red herring fallacy. That information is distracting from the relevant piece of information. The next time I will tackle such a problem I can try and simplify the case as we did in this video for 3-4 people. A great insight.

oh God! what wonderful man we have been given

wow really needed this

very nice explained

that was such o godd video! keep on making logic-related lessons

@emileventer

4 ай бұрын

Google thinks it has had an handle on i 0:16 nfinity, but it does'nt whatsoever. Google and their communist overlords want us 2 suffer a similar fate as they wished upon their own somewhere in Siberia

@emileventer

4 ай бұрын

Russia could never offer you a milkshake of any kind. They had bomba nuclear weapons 4 u Instead. People of the Rus has nil value 2 offer anyone else.

Pigeon hole principle is right, but it has its limits, for instance it’s application as far as temporal considerations, and locality :-)

thanks

Hey, infinity = nil, which is number without value. Dividing 1 by zero produces a not a number result

Case 2 can have 0, 1 or 2 handshakes, so the number of possible handshakes is still n - 1, not sure why Eddie said n - 2. I think he might have meant the maximum.

Can you have a session to explain why a negative number with an exponent that is not a whole number, gives an error?

@Nino-eo8ey

9 ай бұрын

I could somewhat explain that thought. If we have a real number K, taking K^(1/2) is the same as taking the square root of K, I know that this is pretty wild, but there exist a lot of simple proofs if you search on KZread. Assume K = -1, if we take K^(1/2) this basically means the -1^(1/2) OR the square root of -1. Taking the square root of a negative number obviously doesn't give you a REAL number, therefore your calculator gives an error. (Note: if your calculator does include complex numbers, then the calculator won't error, but you won't get a REAL number, you'll get something like 4i)

The more I hear about the Pigeonhole Principle the more I think it's an unnecessarily unrelatable metaphor of something that's more straightforward than it sounds.... 😅

@emileventer

4 ай бұрын

Google et al boxes you. Afterwards, they sell your info to bad actors.

@emileventer

4 ай бұрын

Next they want to verify your banking detaiks

@emileventer

4 ай бұрын

Nighilists like the russian people always look 4 loopholes 2 break euro society. Or African society. Russians will never break chinese wall people

@emileventer

4 ай бұрын

Or Afrikaners. We know their suffering, since 1799.

@emileventer

4 ай бұрын

China Wall can be broken by Afrikaner Mense.

How many times do i have 2 say communists are bad humans

wrong. they could all shake hands with one another, in which case there would be 3 handshakes for everyone. but maybe I am not understanding the question correctly. what I mean is the minimum must not necessarily be 1.