It's amazing how we claim to be creatures of knowledge, and yet when faced with a new discovery, we are too scared to learn... remember, we only fear what we don't know. Cern, keep it up. My only wish is that you share the knowledge

keep up until the whole knowledge of the universe comes to earth

@TheCriticalBiblicalThinker

3 ай бұрын

Satanic knowledge*

@Florida79578

3 ай бұрын

​@@TheCriticalBiblicalThinkerconspiracy theories ruin cern also you mad cuz u can not comprehend it

@polarisukyc1204

2 ай бұрын

@@TheCriticalBiblicalThinkerif all knowledge discovered by CERN is satanic then get off the internet, that was invented at CERN

I ' ll translate to portuguese ! Great work!

😂😂 Your going to find what your looking for.

What happens when you microwave the Higgs Boson particle?

@mad5161

2 ай бұрын

It appears and decays in less than an imaginable fraction of a second. How do you plan to put such a particle in a microwave?

Does CERN have any articles on physicists against the Palestinian Apartheid? I know Peter Higgs has been open about it, so I’m interested if there’s a way to find a comprehensive list. I miss Peter & hope to meet your community ASAP!!

Are particles used from space? What happens when tritium impacts a neutrino? 😁

@whocares2277

3 ай бұрын

The LHC accelerates protons coming from a hydrogen bottle. We study particles coming from space with other detectors.

@polarisukyc1204

2 ай бұрын

There wouldn’t be much interaction between tritium and a neutrino, you’ve got to remember that neutrinos are the ghost of particle physics, they almost never interact with matter, in fact there are billions of em passing though the earth (and everything on it) every second

😎😎😎

To prove that quarks (subatomic particles) are more real while protons and neutrons (atomic particles) are less real, we need to establish a clear definition of what we mean by "real" and then provide evidence or logical arguments that support this claim. Let's approach this step by step. Definition of "real": For the purpose of this proof, we will define "real" as being more fundamental, indivisible, and closer to the underlying nature of reality. Proof: 1. Quarks are the fundamental building blocks of matter: - Protons and neutrons are composed of quarks. Protons consist of two up quarks and one down quark, while neutrons consist of one up quark and two down quarks. - Quarks are not known to have any substructure; they are considered to be elementary particles. - Therefore, quarks are more fundamental than protons and neutrons. 2. Quarks are indivisible: - Protons and neutrons can be divided into their constituent quarks through high-energy particle collisions. - However, there is no known way to divide quarks into smaller components. They are believed to be indivisible. - Therefore, quarks are indivisible, while protons and neutrons are divisible. 3. Quarks are closer to the underlying nature of reality: - The Standard Model of particle physics, which is our most comprehensive theory of the fundamental particles and forces, describes quarks as elementary particles that interact through the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces. - Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, are composite particles that emerge from the interactions of quarks. - Therefore, quarks are closer to the underlying nature of reality as described by our most fundamental scientific theories. 4. Quarks exhibit more fundamental properties: - Quarks have intrinsic properties such as color charge, flavor, and spin, which determine how they interact with each other and with other particles. - Protons and neutrons derive their properties from the collective behavior of their constituent quarks. - Therefore, the properties of quarks are more fundamental than those of protons and neutrons. 5. Quarks are necessary for the existence of protons and neutrons: - Without quarks, protons and neutrons would not exist, as they are composed entirely of quarks. - However, quarks can exist independently of protons and neutrons, as demonstrated by the existence of other hadrons such as mesons, which are composed of one quark and one antiquark. - Therefore, quarks are necessary for the existence of protons and neutrons, but not vice versa. Conclusion: Based on the above arguments, we can conclude that quarks are more real than protons and neutrons. Quarks are more fundamental, indivisible, and closer to the underlying nature of reality as described by our most advanced scientific theories. They exhibit intrinsic properties that determine the behavior of composite particles like protons and neutrons, and they are necessary for the existence of these atomic particles. It is important to note that this proof relies on our current scientific understanding of particle physics and the nature of matter. As our knowledge advances, our understanding of what is "real" may evolve. However, based on the current evidence and theories, the argument for the greater reality of quarks compared to protons and neutrons is strong.

In case you wonder they only see interactions with waves(or ripples but those have more dimentions) , to see a particle meas you can detect the same particle more than once. But as they are suposed to be fundamental once you detected It you altered It. Also particle means It can exist by itself and quantum that there are no subdivisions from It , just a dumb idea only imagine an electron on an empty univerve... Both concepts are quantum but quite absurd cos you wont be able to measure distances time the particle... Cos there are no particles and they are no quantum... You see interactions of plasma currents ... The part can not exist without the whole thing . The fact is that planck constant creates that illusion but also the concept particle ignores frecuencies and the media.

@polarisukyc1204

2 ай бұрын

You sound as incoherent at Terrence Howard right now

Ya están diciendo tonterías sobre su máquina de chispazos?

Totally not witchcraft. Cool charged crystals though.

There must be honesty. Where is your nobility? Where is the honor? Where is the support? Where is the scientific interest and curiosity for new experiences? BIG ERROR in measuring the Universe, black holes, dark energy,... Let me judge all this by the result of a direct experiment, gentlemen of physics Let's do the Michelson-Morley experiment on a school bus and determine the speed in a straight line - this is exactly the experiment Einstein dreamed of. Perhaps we will see the postulates: “Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and Dominant gravitational fields control the speed of light in a vacuum.” There is a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, two coils with optical fiber, where the light in each arm travels 16,000 meters, without exceeding the parameters of 0.4/0.4/0.4 meters and mass - 4 kg.

@willrose5424

3 ай бұрын

You didn't listen to the results. It takes months to years to analyze collision data. Criticism is a mirror for your lack of contribution. 🥸