I was fortunate to have one course in intro to anthropology at Harvard. It was amazing and nearly knocked me off my Art History tract. If she was a professor --

Very informative!!! Love the presentation

Brilliant, informative and insightful. .Leslie is a super star, in the context of any stage of human development!.

@djbareshi6632

2 жыл бұрын

Ol

As a former Off Road enthusiast I can say he got the history of Toyota all wrong. The first one was actually the FJ1, standing for Fujimoro Jeep 1, it consisted of Jeep vehicles that Fujimoro of Toyota was able to get licensed to build for the UN during the Korean War. Because of the inclement weather in Korea, Toyota was contracted to add the modification of a metal top. Having said that the analogy works very well.

@weansardman

6 жыл бұрын

Gerard Trigo the BJ is a much later model and is actually the diesel version of the FJ - i think.

Don’t you think that’s teaching this type of info from junior high school and high school would cut down “racism” but much???

@Dwg256

2 жыл бұрын

12.10.2021.

Very interesting!

If this video is for non-commercial use.... why are there ads at the beginning?

Great info, delivered in such a "reachable" way. I loved this. I hope this scientist does more of these!

2 Mio years are ca.. 80.000 Generations.

Re first speaker: So what was the change in diet? Substantially more meat and grains. Less fruit?

@spaceghost8995

4 жыл бұрын

Fruits were always seasonal anyway.

@kupofdirt6509

2 жыл бұрын

From what I understand we began eating less grasses and seeds and instead began eating meat, which allowed much quicker development. (Small amount of meat= VERY LARGE amount of plants.) Kind of lile how a cow eats all day and a lion eats every once in a while.

I really hate the music or sounds that CARTA plays during it’s intro. It’s spooky sounding and grinds on my nerves at the same time. I can understand if you don’t hate it like me but who in the first place heard it and said “wow. This is a great sound to play at the front of every video while showing our CARTA intro.” “Yes! Pick this sound for music!”

@MrCrystalm8

4 жыл бұрын

You're sound like the kind of person to go home and talk shit online about the customer service u received at the store.

@danielauto3767

4 жыл бұрын

I like the music.

MR BENTLEY!!!!!! Sike naw great video..very informative

Bernard Wood looks like the late BBC sport presenter Jimmy Hill

@bellywood7688

4 жыл бұрын

And therefore Bruce Forsyth

@rasredi

3 жыл бұрын

He's a doppleganger!

Brilliant

The most dominant colour on Earth is BLACK! Mix with any colours we still get traces of blackish colour while with white colour it becomes transparent. Hence, white light contains 7 colours present in the beautiful rainbow.

Seems like there is a quite hot debate among scientists regarding in which genus should H. Habilis be included.

I'm here for an Anthropology Class 2021-Pandemic Times- USA Los Angeles

Fyi, go and look for the 'wild papaya' plant in the jungle. Observe its 'elongated sharp' yellowish skin fruits quite different from the 'modern papaya'. From wild type to tame type with a change in environment.

(using my best Spock voice) Facinating

Are our dear friends above involved with sophistical words? Thank you

@elijahreeves4890

3 жыл бұрын

@frankos rooni ^

I want this guy to present everything from now on.

I really feel for older lady mid video she's clearly so so nervous and really struggling with public speaking. I'm so nervous talking on stage or public speaking and she battles through and keeps going even when she can barely talk because of the nerves. I'd have ran off stage bright red and dripping with sweat lol. Fair play to her and maximum respect for getting up there and doing for us to watch and learn

@alexandrapopova9760

Жыл бұрын

Her lecture was the best rly

Imagine how much better the world would be if all creationists had to watch the CARTA lectures before forming their opinions on how humans came to be.

@caradocapcunobelin2875

3 жыл бұрын

Christianity wouldnt go away if thats what you think.

@DivineBanana

3 жыл бұрын

@@caradocapcunobelin2875 go away, no, but reduced to a fringe cult? Maybe. It would certainly have a big impact on the amount of people that atleast accept evolution. There's plenty of Christians that believe in both their religion and evolution. Prime example being Francis Collins, one of the most famous geneticists who led the human genome project and believes in evolution but also who is also an evangelical christian.

@caradocapcunobelin2875

3 жыл бұрын

@@DivineBanana yeah I can agree with you there. Showing creationists some recent human evolution would probably help them see that they are just wrong. Also they need to understand that believing in evolution does not mean that their faith is invalid or wrong. Otherwise they wont accept the message you give.

one think i always wonder if how we can tell the difference between populations of the same species and different species, for example humans today we tiny(under 5) and large (over 6) people will skeleton alone could we tell they are the same species. some animals that are alive today have weird skeletons are images of what they might look like if guess was similar to how we think dinosaurs look. like if no elephants were alive today would we know if they had a trunk.

Jimmy Hill!

you have very tactfully left out 'Why'? Thank you!

Almost nothing on diet. : /

Buuuut, what about plesiomorphy?

I heard an interesting question and I would like to hear opinions on this. You know how 200,000 years ago when Homo Sapiens emerged in Africa, there were other hominids in the world such as Naledi, Erectus, Denisovans... Is it possible that one day a new Homo species will emerge and live on Earth with Homo Sapiens? The same way Homo Sapiens lived among those others?

@kupofdirt6509

2 жыл бұрын

Thats a great question, I would think that it is very much possible for exactly the reason you stated, it's such a good question that I would encourage you to keep expanding and sharpening it. One of the things I think about is 'what defines a species?' For example, erectus and ergaster are considered their own separate species by some however others consider them to be the same species. There's also people like neanderthals who get their name mostly based on geographical location. Whoever comes after homo sapiens will have the recorded information that we create, so I am not sure if they will consider themselves a new species or not. Someone should definitely think into this some more!

They keep saying adult at 18. My data says males normally stop growing by the time they are 21 and females at 18. The actual date at which a person stops growth can be a lot sooner for both genders. My personal observation is that a heck of a lot of females are 85% or more grown by the sixth grade or 11 to 13 and given the opportunity they can and will reproduce. I'm now told that it is "normal" for a female white to hit puberty at 8 and an African American by 7 which I know does happen but that's extreme in my view. My reading suggests that a great many societies in the past placed 13 for females or after puberty as old enough to marry. That changes the reproduction numbers a lot. Males were normally blocked from mating until around 13 or 14 or so or they passed some sort of initiation or test. It should still be noted that some societies did things a tad sooner with the Saxons considering a person adult at 10 or so I have read. I wasn't around at the time.

@skyjuiceification

6 жыл бұрын

Dwight E Howell ...so what was ur point in posting all of this?...

@8698gil

4 жыл бұрын

Dwight E Howell What do you mean “given the opportunity they can and will reproduce” you make it sound as though little girls just can’t wait to start screwing around. Your whole post was pretty strange

@clivewells1736

Жыл бұрын

I think the earliest pregnancy that went to term was a 5 year old Mexican rape victim and which was blamed on hormones fed to local chickens.

@ollylambert1039

Жыл бұрын

Wow that's scary a 5year old.

hell ! watched video carefuly till the end but i did not grasp anything....dang!

The first speaker looks like Jimmy Hill.

@WilfChadwick

5 жыл бұрын

My thoughts precisely. Hail Hill.

@memomorph5375

3 жыл бұрын

I thought Colonel Sanders lol

ထိုင္းဇာတ္ကားမ်ား

@dr.suryanarayanan9256

4 жыл бұрын

What language is this? The script is beautiful

@Simon.the.Likeable

4 жыл бұрын

Thai is close, but no cigar for you. The text is Burmese.

Fuck! it's Jimmy Hill's smarter brother.....!

To all the evolution deniers in this comment section, answer my questions 1) why do all human babies have a yolk sack, when they’re in the womb?.. 2) why are they also covered head to foot in hair (like other apes)?......

@dr.suryanarayanan9256

4 жыл бұрын

Answer: Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.

@TheUltimateNatural

4 жыл бұрын

Human babies are covered in hair when in the womb?

@fionapaterson-wiebe3108

4 жыл бұрын

A very minor correction; the human species IS classified as a great ape. There’s no like about it.

@fionapaterson-wiebe3108

4 жыл бұрын

TheUltimateNatural yes. The hair is usually shed sometime before birth, and ingested in the womb. The first bowel movements post natal are called meconium, which is the waste from this. On rare occasions, babies are born still hairy.

@pinball1970

3 жыл бұрын

@@gardinermulford9072 So why did Jesus give us viral DNA strands?

Is he The Jefferson’s neighbor?

Jesus was correct about at least one thing... Speaking about his followers, Jesus is reported to have said, "Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand." He clearly understood that his followers were a bit slow in the head. Too many Christians reject science and confuse mythology with evidence and fact. Clearly, Jesus understood his follower's mental shortcomings

@FreedomAnderson

4 жыл бұрын

Jesus is a fictional being.

@JesusFriedChrist

3 жыл бұрын

Freedom Anderson Correct. Nothing more than a myth.

@PeepsDancingFeet

3 жыл бұрын

@@FreedomAnderson all the people making comment like yours are actually working against your cause...Can you show me where a scientist proves Jesus or a god doesn't exist? For someone to make important claims that there is, or isn't a god, they should be held accountable to their evidence... Like maybe you have a link for us, where I can do more homework...if there is a god and the being didn't want us to be capable of proving it...then it would be hard to prove...and if there is no god, than it will still be difficult to prove because such a claim should be backed by a large amount of evidence. For instance, just saying that god doesn't exist because we can prove that the earth was made in millions of years opposed to 7 days is not exactly the scientific process. A person would need to prove that there are no ways to speed up or slow down time, and that a being could never control those things... And many other difficult questions will need to be answered to prove there is no god. On the other side, where the bible says the earth was made in 7 days, a person can not prove science is wrong using the bible...unless they are prepared to provide large amounts of evidence that they can prove Jesus intended us to believe that 7 days to god is same as 7 days to a human, which many do believe, but not all Christians do. in concussion, if Jesus is fictional, than it would be helpful for your cause to prove it instead of just say it...And if your not willing to prove it, than I suggest to not say it...your cause is to bring others towers science and not push them away... regardless if a being could build this amazing earth in 7 days or if it took millions of years....its still amazing and I'm grateful for it...So unless your commenting on an article with a thesis: God exists, or god doesn't exist...commenting things like "god is fake" on ever time you see some one use science, then you are contributing towards disenfranchising Christian people from science, and we need Christians, as well as everyone, to believe in science. That not just for you, Christians disenfranchise believers in science with equally wasteful comments... If an oracle told you either god does or doesn't exist...don't believe what the oracle says...instead use science...a process in witch a man...any man...can have a hunch, faith, or feeling of a truth...they can then turn that into a hypnosis(a specific question)…They can then run tests. After that more tests. then more test. until every time you you run a test, you get the same results. Then is the last step, testing by the public and anyone on the planet who wants to challenge should be allowed to challenge( because different points of view and not your own are important for the last step, just like proofreading.)

@PeepsDancingFeet

3 жыл бұрын

@@JesusFriedChrist Your comment is just as wasteful as freedom Anderson

@Lepocoloco

2 жыл бұрын

@@PeepsDancingFeet LMFAO. I love how creationists miss represent science. _"Weather it took billions of years or six days to make the universe doesn't matter and I use science"_ Hilarious. Also, the burden of proof is on you. You claim you have a magical friend, then you present the evidence. Not someone trying to disprove every brain fart ever made. Nothing suggests a God exist and you can't disprove a false claim. You can't disprove I have pink unicorns in my bathtub who makes all the french waffles in the world. You can use evidence against my claim to prove me wrong but not start out from a false perspective to shift the burden of proof. Same goes for a God. And I see you have chosen the Christian one for yourself (or your parents have). The Bible is a unscientific fairytale, so using that as evidence would be the same as using Harry Potter books as evidence for his existence.

28:44 Australopithecusses ?!?!!!! You surely mean Australopithecines, right?

@katiekat4457

4 жыл бұрын

Surya Narayanan Wow. You are very smart.

@dr.suryanarayanan9256

4 жыл бұрын

@@katiekat4457 Naw. Only for those who are easy to impress.

@jamesdavis5517

4 жыл бұрын

The use of ‘(statement), right?’ Is just a bad grammatically incorrect habit, too. Make your bed first before criticising. Better still, eliminate criticism as you will live happier.

@daviddawson1718

4 жыл бұрын

@@dr.suryanarayanan9256 you are an asshole

@daviddawson1718

4 жыл бұрын

@@jamesdavis5517 no reason to throw out a go lecture for 2 grammatical errors. She used "me" where she should have used "I". Interesting talk

Let's not forget Hylobates, the only other living biped among the apes. And it runs bipedally!

some one please fossilize that piano...

look at dogs.. 20k yrs and they've changed soo much.. like they got CRISPR edited.

@bigboyshit1

4 жыл бұрын

Arnold G - yes but look at Islam

@JesusFriedChrist

3 жыл бұрын

Natural selection is a powerful force. Artificial selection is even more powerful.

Complexity is the Achilles heel of evolution, and shows that life’s creation can only come from a Mind--especially considering the amount of complexity we are talking about. Example 1) Proteins and amino acids are the building blocks of life. Human proteins are made up of 20 amino acids arranged in order. 2) a small protein would be considered one with 150 amino acids, arranged in order to form a protein. 3) So at each position in a protein, there are 20 different amino acid choices for that one position--like a combination lock. 4) If you do the math, this means that the chance of just this one small protein to come into existence by chance is, 1 chance in 10 to the 163 power. Dr. Fred Hoyle--who coined the phrase Big Bang-said that any probability of 1 chance in 10 to the 50th power or higher would be considered a miracle. 5) The universe has only been around 10 to the 18 seconds since the Big Bang 6) There are only 10 to the 83rd atoms in the observable universe. 7) This means, that their is neither enough time, nor is it enough resources for CHANCE ALONE TO WORK, and create JUST THIS ONE PROTIEN, which is much less than FIRST LIFE, the first cell, or Abiogenesis. And FIRST LIFE does NOT have the luxury of Natural Selection, JUST PURE CHANCE. 8) Now we are talking about JUST the mathematical probability of ONE small protein coming into existence by pure chance, and we are only talking about one aspect of the protein-the proper order of the amino acids. 9) Some proteins are over a thousand amino acids long. 10) Now add: Basic Life conservatively would need 250 proteins all at once to spontaneously create a cell 11) Now add: One factor in protein building is that all the amino acids would need to be left handed--when in nature both left and right ones exist in the same little pond. 12) Now add: One other factor overlooked is the folding of the protein. The protein only works if it is folded correctly after it is assembled. 13) Now add: The folding is done by a molecular machine inside the cell, that itself is built from other proteins. (so which came first the molecular machine or the protein-also an example of irreducible complexity) 14) If a protein had to be developed by chance before life began-who did the folding? 15) Now add: The molecular machine not only folds the protein, but it somehow must know what type of protein it is working with, and also must have knowledge of how to fold the protein. 16) So you not only need the amino acids and proteins, but you also need digital information of what protein to make (DNA and RNA) , but again, the molecular machine needs to be smart enough to know what proteins are being sent to it, and how to fold them (EPIGENITICS). 17) So the formation of all proteins-ultimately needs digital information before the protein can be created-chance is NOT an option as I have already shown. WHERE DID ALL THAT DIGITAL INFORMATION COME FROM? Where do all digital codes come from today-A MIND 18) So yes life is toooo complicated, and all we have talked about is ONE CELL at the most.

I like landrovers

@loganstone8205

8 жыл бұрын

I like turtles

7 жыл бұрын

I'm more of a burro guy!

@thakurshil1007

5 жыл бұрын

I like holes

waow

Jimmy hills twin brother wtf

@WilfChadwick

5 жыл бұрын

Close, he's his modern day cousin.

@justinalverez577

4 жыл бұрын

exactly what i thought, even sounds like him. best lookalike ive ever seen!

Talk

still the old story, kind of those told to children. Geneticists, not all of them believe more and more that the shift that happened in crops around the fertile crescent is not possible or logic. Something happened but they are not shure what. the genetic just don't add up

how much of his speech is biased

@simonruszczak5563

6 жыл бұрын

95% ?

@JesusFriedChrist

3 жыл бұрын

Wrong

should just turn off the comments.

Keeper of Fire One who stands tall The power in your Brain Makes you Lord over All But the World has to pay For what you have made An Atom breakin'War makin' Road to the grave Oh Alien Chimp Alien Chimp Creator of technology Chipper of Flint

@thatkidwholovesfighting7638

3 жыл бұрын

?????????

@whoneverknow9588

3 жыл бұрын

@@thatkidwholovesfighting7638 Now you may say, it can't be so But you'd be amazed at what DNA shows Just one point six, the added mix Makes you such a beautiful Alien Chimp......

Challenge to anyone believe this crap , Show me one species , only one species became different one , Apes are different than humans species , show me mammal became fish or bird or anything like this , a bird became in different shape but stayed as bird that is not prove that an ape become different species as human because the are separate species , this challenge has been going for 100 years now by scholars and yet no one could have answered it , one evidence of species changing , a prove of that wales used to live on land as mammals when they went to water they stayed mammals they did not turn to fish but stayed mammals

@ObservantHistorian

3 жыл бұрын

Mohmmad Aldabobe : This is the same ignorant shit you said two years ago. The internet is overflowing with videos that address everything you've said. You don't have to agree with them, but when you say "Show me...," that's just an indication that you're too fucking intellectually lazy to make any effort for yourself, and too arrogant in your ignorance to think you have to. People like you present "challenges" like this as though you're the first person to ever do it, and as though there's never been any answers to the questions. Regardless of where you stand, your post is just a reflection of your ignorance and laziness. Image that you made an honest attempt to learn about the actual science and refute it with educated cogent arguments, instead of just trotting out your ignorance in public. But in two years, with the wealth of human knowledge at your fingertips, you are convinced you know all there is to know. The arrogant ignorance of people like you is the millstone around the neck of humanity.

@jaymz1999

3 жыл бұрын

Mohmmad Aldabobe You are not an exact copy of your parents. Now repeat that some 50 million years. Take a picture for every new generation. Will you see much difference from one generation to the next one? No. Now look at the picture taken 50 million years ago and compare it to the latest one.

@mohmmadaldabobe3653

3 жыл бұрын

@@ObservantHistorian ​ @ObservantHistorian overflowing ????? mention one species became different species , a bird still a bird , a fish still a fish , mammal still mammal ,,, and you tell me an ape became human , why other apes and monkey did not evolve then ,, what prove that these apes bones belong to early humans not apes , no DNA test can be done the only prove not telling my how resemblance the skeleton to human skeleton , what if it really extinct apes or just un Ugly look human , these days we have some humans with different shapes some could look like apes , still no prove has been provided except showing bones that does not prove anything except assumptions ,,, show me one conclusive prove

@mohmmadaldabobe3653

3 жыл бұрын

@@jaymz1999 i agree with you that humans change with time in looks , but did any monkey become human ???? look i simple it for you , if you bring a woman from 50 thousands years a go and mated with early human would she get pregnant or not ???? but if you mated with Gorilla or any ape would you get the monkey pregnant ,, am telling you show me one species on earth became different species ,, there is non ,, apes are different species than humans ,, the changes throw time did not change the species at all

@ObservantHistorian

3 жыл бұрын

@@mohmmadaldabobe3653 Your replies are just more of the same. As I said before, "when you say 'Show me...,' that's just an indication that you're too fucking intellectually lazy to make any effort for yourself, and too arrogant in your ignorance to think you have to." I'm not arguing with you, any more than I'd argue with a shoe - I'm pointing out to whatever audience there may be that you're full of shit, and why.

I do not believe in evolution

@spatrk6634

2 жыл бұрын

you shouldnt believe it. you should accept it after you learn what it is and how it works. if not, no one cares.

@giakon1

2 жыл бұрын

@@spatrk6634 accept fantasies? there are already religions for this! … Or maybe that's it…. accept god!

@spatrk6634

2 жыл бұрын

@@giakon1 evolution is fact of biology.

@giakon1

2 жыл бұрын

@@spatrk6634 yes a fact like that of jesus christ son of god died on the cross and then resurrected for us!

@spatrk6634

2 жыл бұрын

@@giakon1 yes and david copperfield made a plane disappear for us

i had to stop watching because of the old ladys,slimy lip smacking,that is really uncomfotable.

To much pre-production just get the the f******g point

God created man and women period.

@budd2nd

4 жыл бұрын

Chris - stop trolling 😂

@oldtestament8052

4 жыл бұрын

LMAO Chris, I think it's your nap time.

@gunnar1846

4 жыл бұрын

God created deez nutz

@WhyPhi

4 жыл бұрын

No curiosity allowed.

@UltrEgoVegeta

4 жыл бұрын

Simple minded fool

Complexity is the Achilles heel of evolution, and shows that life’s creation can only come from a Mind--especially considering the amount of complexity we are talking about. Example 1) Proteins and amino acids are the building blocks of life. Human proteins are made up of 20 amino acids arranged in order. 2) a small protein would be considered one with 150 amino acids, arranged in order to form a protein. 3) So at each position in a protein, there are 20 different amino acid choices for that one position--like a combination lock. 4) If you do the math, this means that the chance of just this one small protein to come into existence by chance is, 1 chance in 10 to the 163 power. Dr. Fred Hoyle--who coined the phrase Big Bang-said that any probability of 1 chance in 10 to the 50th power or higher would be considered a miracle. 5) The universe has only been around 10 to the 18 seconds since the Big Bang 6) There are only 10 to the 83rd atoms in the observable universe. 7) This means, that their is neither enough time, nor is it enough resources for CHANCE ALONE TO WORK, and create JUST THIS ONE PROTIEN, which is much less than FIRST LIFE, the first cell, or Abiogenesis. And FIRST LIFE does NOT have the luxury of Natural Selection, JUST PURE CHANCE. 8) Now we are talking about JUST the mathematical probability of ONE small protein coming into existence by pure chance, and we are only talking about one aspect of the protein-the proper order of the amino acids. 9) Some proteins are over a thousand amino acids long. 10) Now add: Basic Life conservatively would need 250 proteins all at once to spontaneously create a cell 11) Now add: One factor in protein building is that all the amino acids would need to be left handed--when in nature both left and right ones exist in the same little pond. 12) Now add: One other factor overlooked is the folding of the protein. The protein only works if it is folded correctly after it is assembled. 13) Now add: The folding is done by a molecular machine inside the cell, that itself is built from other proteins. (so which came first the molecular machine or the protein-also an example of irreducible complexity) 14) If a protein had to be developed by chance before life began-who did the folding? 15) Now add: The molecular machine not only folds the protein, but it somehow must know what type of protein it is working with, and also must have knowledge of how to fold the protein. 16) So you not only need the amino acids and proteins, but you also need digital information of what protein to make (DNA and RNA) , but again, the molecular machine needs to be smart enough to know what proteins are being sent to it, and how to fold them (EPIGENITICS). 17) So the formation of all proteins-ultimately needs digital information before the protein can be created-chance is NOT an option as I have already shown. WHERE DID ALL THAT DIGITAL INFORMATION COME FROM? Where do all digital codes come from today-A MIND 18) So yes life is toooo complicated, and all we have talked about is ONE CELL at the most.

@patrickturner6878

3 жыл бұрын

@bubba lee No one with dissenting views is a "danger to the community". When did we adopt this cultural idea that people with wierd, strange religious or cultural beliefs are suddenly "dangerous"?? Flat Earthers and Anti-Evolutionists are flat out wrong and 99% of humanity knows it. They are not a threat to anyone's community. Ignorance is not a crime. They are no more a danger than an illiterate person.

@commentingaccount1383

Жыл бұрын

You are making a lot of slap-dash assumptions about probabilities here. I wouldn't be so quick to rule anything out based on these assumptions. However, I recognize that you will believe whatever you want to regardless of any evidence that is right in front of your face. The universe is complicated; don't be so arrogant as to believe you know everything about how life could have originated. Just because the exact origin of life is currently beyond our ability to understand, doesn't mean that it is entirely unknowable, or that it must have originated through a higher consciousness.