GOD BLESS THE BULGARIAN PEOPLE WITH HEALTH, JOY, AND PROSPERITY.

@booze3758

5 жыл бұрын

ty lmao

@emrekucuk4005

5 жыл бұрын

Which one, many god over there :D

@resonancesynergy3253

5 жыл бұрын

God bless you Nikolaos!

@peterpetrov7073

5 жыл бұрын

Να σαι καλά φίλος.

@peterpetrov7073

5 жыл бұрын

@Ellinika Stream Clips ?

Greetings from Republic of Chuvashia (Volga Bulgaria)

@ermakalai

6 жыл бұрын

Здравей Братко от Чувашия. Не се притеснявай да ми пишеш.

@knyazvojvoda4560

6 жыл бұрын

Той нито те разбира, нито може да ти отговори на словенобългарски.

@tabasscoproductions368

5 жыл бұрын

@Accelerated ya that ridiculous

@tabasscoproductions368

5 жыл бұрын

1st of gypsies is a offensive word for Roma xinthy ecetra , they are nowadays everywhere but they aren't turkic at least not from the roots. we were slavanized Danube bulgars, we were forced. but our dna is still very much turkic. sadly because of Russian propaganda most Bulgarians don't recon that.@Pan-Turkic Nationalist

@nikolaystefanov2189

5 жыл бұрын

Pan-Turkic Nationalist watch this video again,my misguided friend

I rememer when I was 7-8 years old and asked my father: Are we slavs? He replied: No, we are bulgarians.

@sinisadabic5371

3 жыл бұрын

but if you are iranian than we are related,greetings from croatia

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

@@sinisadabic5371 Volite nasu bracu Hrvate

@sinisadabic5371

3 жыл бұрын

@@petertodorov1792 pa iskreno ne vjerujem u teoriju da su bugari nekakvi turkic kosooki, ni ne izgledate tako niti je jezik takav, niti kultura,vjerojatno ste iranci nekakvi što automatski znači da smo rođaci,

@runegold321

3 жыл бұрын

@@sinisadabic5371 estestveno che sme rodnini, vsichki balkanski narodi sa genetichno blizki edni s drugi. Balgarite imame 1,5% iztochno aziatsko DNA podobno na drugite evropeyski narodi, taka che sus sigurnost tyurkskiyat primes e izklyuchitelno malak, nay-veroyatno ot kumani, pechenegi i tatari, no otnovo te sa bili malki izklyucheniya. Hvala!

@sinisadabic5371

3 жыл бұрын

@@runegold321 e gotovo sve razumio :))

Very interesting! I didn't know Bulgarian history was so strange and full of migrations and colonizations! Greetings from neighboring Serbia!

@zdravkopopov33

8 жыл бұрын

+David Blagic It's almost intresting that you have no clue you are bulgarian who did migrate long ago

@DavidBlagic156945

8 жыл бұрын

zdravko popov Here goes another stereotypical Balkan nationalist... It's actually funny how rudely you act towards a person which tried to show its respect towards your nation and its history.

@danield831

8 жыл бұрын

+David Blagic I agree. While I think it's good to have a certain amount of pride in one's own culture and country, history has shown that narrow minded nationalism is poison. Very sad that people are blinded by it. Mr Blagic please pay no attention to such fools. We are all Balkan brothers!!

@zdravkopopov33

8 жыл бұрын

Its not about nations and all people came from 1 place and they were not bound by nations and stuff

@DavidBlagic156945

8 жыл бұрын

Daniel D I could not agree more! :-D It's just sad how hardcore nationalism ruined Balkans. Thought I love my country, I also have respect for other countries and nations, especially for my Slavic and Orthodox brothers! :-D

I support Bulgaria. Greetings from Greece

@nikistoilova2352

6 жыл бұрын

We always supporting my neighbords❤

@resonancesynergy3253

5 жыл бұрын

God bless you, Friend!

@vakavakata1218

5 жыл бұрын

@@aybala4127 you are angry because you are not an empire anymore and everyone hate turks :D

@aybala4127

5 жыл бұрын

@ 🤣🤣🤣😂😂🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🤘🤘💪💪💪

@aybala4127

5 жыл бұрын

@@vakavakata1218 🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤘💪💪💪💪💪💪🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

Yes, this is a very interesting presentation. Now, i am learning Basic Bulgarian phrases. I see that Bulgarian Language an interesting language.

@boyanbogdanov1854

3 жыл бұрын

It's very different from the other slavic languages. Its grammar is much closer to English grammar than to Serbian which is interesting to the least.

@DimitarDimitrov-bk4xm

5 ай бұрын

​@@boyanbogdanov1854 Българският език е най-древният тракийски и славянски език. Затова са о той от всички славянски език е аналитичен, безпадежен, какъвто е и английският. Генетически българите са на 90% траки и са много далеч от всички азиатци, кавказки, иранци или памирци. Близостта на българския език с иранския се дължи на тракийското влияние върху персите. Б.Димитров много спекулира. Пренебрегват се всички древни сведения и артефакти. Траките поне 4 пъти са покорявали персите и са управлявали там. Говори се, че името на Аспарух, е иранско и идва от думата "аспа"- кон. Но това е заемка от тракийския език. Тази дума има 3 варианта при траките: адпа, испа и еспа. Името на Аспарух има също 3 вариации:Аспарух,Исперих и Есперих, както и цар Испор. Даже едно от имената на иранците е мидийци, по името на тракийското племе миди, управлявало персийските земи. Тези наши историци не се умориха да търсят нашите корени къде ли не в чужбина, за последно в Иран, но си затварят очите пред очевидното, че сме местен народ, траки. Не могат да преглътнат егото си, че са грешали и поддържали грешни теории, че дължат кариерите си на тези лъжи и продължават да измислят нови теории, като Б..Димитров. Поддържа се и лъжата за дошлите от север славяни. Всъщност славяни е общото самоназвание на всички тракийски народи и техните роднини, венетите (поляци, чехи, словаци, словенци и др.). Няма никакви следи от идването на някакви измислени славяни от север на Балканите. Няма! Всичко е тракийско. Българският език е най-древният тракийски и славянски език и затова само той е аналитичен, безпадежнъй, а всички останали славянски езици са синтетични, с падежи. Това означава че няма как българите са се славянизирани и за приели славянския език от ниско развитите славяни и са загубили езика и културата си? Как така победителите на Римската империя и на арабския халифат за има няма 100-150 години са били асимилирани от славяните, нямащи нито държава, нито организирана армия. Приказки за малки деца. Българите са конници. Но защо не се казва, че траките са първия конен народ в света, че най,- древните кости на опитомени коне в света са открити край Китен? Жените на българите били силно и имали права?! Но защо не се вижда, че още в древността тракийките са били равнопоставени с мъжете и е имало жени жрици, като Олимпия, майката на Александър Македонски. Надявам се знаете, че македонците са траки, а не гърци. Ако не, трябва много, много да четете. Б.Димитров има някои заслуги и дотам. Относно нашия произход той греши или по-скоро не иска да признае истината и грешките си. За съжаление. Та днес даже турците започват да се изкарват траки покрай тракийската Троя и т.н. Срамно е, че Димитров няма сили да признае истината. Та думата Кан, представена като иранска е същата като тюркския Хан. Няма разлика. Заменяме тюрките с иранци и сме в същото небесно лозе, в същата лъжа, че сме пришелци на Балканите и затова ни орязаха и територията няколко пъти. Лъжите на нашите историци допринесоха за това, както признава и Димитров.

Срам че паднахме от такава висота.

@catch_me_if_you_can6596

6 жыл бұрын

kvo??

@Anmobgoccult20

4 жыл бұрын

Паднахме, защото никой не иска силна непобедима България, а путин категорично отказа да се присъедините към нас, всички 4,5 републики с коренно българско население, но един ден и това, ще стане, русия се страхува от могъща стара България и затова винаги е гледала да изопачи историята НИ свята и стара!!!

@bulgariannationalist1637

3 жыл бұрын

@@Anmobgoccult20 Абе ти нормален ли си бе нямаме нищо общо с тези татари после защо македонците ни наричат така тяхният ген е по различен от нашият

@anonimus1642

2 жыл бұрын

@@bulgariannationalist1637 за кви татари мрънкаш бе Аутист? Виж си видеата

@anonimus1642

2 жыл бұрын

@@bulgariannationalist1637 ти пиян ли си? Неадекватен ли си какъв си кой ще ти се подиграва. Какви 5 лева бахти глупавите хора

This was quite interesting. Thanks for adding subtitles.

Now that explains when my dad was telling me that when he was in Ukraine parts some of it they spoke olden Bulgarian

@axechop

4 жыл бұрын

Those are the descendants of Bulgarians who were refugees from the 1828-1830 Russo-Turkish war of Greek independence. Some of them settled in Crimea or other parts of Ukraine, others in Bessarabia (today's Moldova and the southernmost part of Ukraine) and some (including my ancestors) came back and settled around Varna.

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Old Bulgar is an Oghur Turkic language not slavic

@JustSlav98

3 жыл бұрын

@@papazataklaattiranimam thats even older bulgarian but old bulgarian is the oldest slavic language

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

@@JustSlav98 medieval bulgarian language

@JustSlav98

3 жыл бұрын

@@papazataklaattiranimam yes , really old bulgar was turkic , but slavic old bulgarian is the first and oldest slavic language and the first to use the Cyrillic alphabet before russian

Привет от волжских булгар ( татар)

@-unionforhelptothepoorpeople

4 жыл бұрын

привет

@-unionforhelptothepoorpeople

4 жыл бұрын

от Дунавска България

@rositsadoneva4724

4 жыл бұрын

Привет от Дунавска България!

@dimodonev3916

4 жыл бұрын

Привет из Дунайская Болгария.

@distructorivan5773

4 жыл бұрын

Привет от Дунавска България

My DNA test says I am Bulgarian. I was born in America. Hi ancestors.

@tedv8323

Жыл бұрын

Greetings from Sofia :)

@GamblerOfficial-e5c

4 ай бұрын

Let's goo hope you are proud of that

Im from New Zealand. My daughter is Bulgarian Maori, probably the first intertwining of the two bloodlines in history. ( As far as I know ) My daughter is so phenomenally beautiful and intelligent, you wouldn't believe how smart and mature this 8 year old girl is unless you saw her for yourself. Piano, tennis, singing, performing arts, swimming, mathematics, I could go on, basically, anything she wants to do, she does and excels very well. Her grandparents (Bulgarian) were Gold medalists in the Seoul Olympics. My grandparents were, what you would call in English "priests" or "pastors", fully followed Jesus and his teachings. I want to know if anyone has any information on Bulgarian prophets or just anything "historically Christian". I understand the religious wars and in a video here on KZread (history of Bulgaria) It states Bulgaria was officially named and known as "Christian" for 200 years. Thank you, I look forward to any finger being pointed in a direction for me. :)

@user-uk1bi4fp4z

4 жыл бұрын

"It states Bulgaria was officially named and known as "Christian" for 200 years. " I don't know where you've read that, but we were converted to Christianity in 864. We are mainly Orthodox Christians, but there are also some Catholics and Muslims. What information exactly you want?

@Ghooster1914

4 жыл бұрын

@Voskre Glavincevska Don't spread lies. Macedonia is 70 yrs old country. You don't make difference between country and region. Macedonia is territory in ancient Greece ( Ellada). Later populated with bulgarians. After 1945 ( Tito the serbian dictator ) managed aggressive policy with pro serbian element in it to change macedonian mind set and home policy. Macedonia is originaly bulgarian territory, read history and stop stealing from your neighbours.

@petarivanov5037

4 жыл бұрын

hay you can check for Petar Deunov, Baba Vanga, Dyado Vlaycho, Bogomils, Boyan Maga, etc.

@bartoszszczepaniak169

3 жыл бұрын

Slavicized Thraco-Polynesian. Nice mix.

@boyanbogdanov1854

3 жыл бұрын

Such a nice comment. You should know that Bulgarians are traditionally very good at maths and are one of the nations with most medals at maths olympics. John Atanasoff, the founder of the first computer is of bulgarian origin. See here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Vincent_Atanasoff

Като гледам и слушам професор Божидар Димитров, лека му пръст и светла памет, чувствам гордост, че съм българин.

@guerguistoyanov137

5 жыл бұрын

Урната (прахът) му разпилян над Созополския залив -- предсмъртно желание на Великият БЪЛГАРИН Божидар Димитров!

@user-db9iz4xk6l

4 жыл бұрын

Ако го беше чул кви простоти говори на хирата от него така шеше да го накалнеш.Сещаш ли се кат си му гомям фен как веднъж човек беше питал семейството му по време на турското робство как ли е живяло.И този негодник и кретен отговаря "Иване тя баба ти са я чукали отпрес отзад отгоре и отдолу па ти какво ме питаш" Егати долния пристак добре че си отиде че хирата да не му траят просташтината.

@Anmobgoccult20

4 жыл бұрын

Беше голям приятел, но го премахнаха, защото, щеше да спечели всички избори, истински човек и българофил, патриот и националист!

@Hobott

4 жыл бұрын

@Jd Pv bullshits

@rumianamitova7130

4 жыл бұрын

@Jd Pv неграмотен идиот

He mentions Alexander the Great could not defeat only the old bulgarians. But he doesn't mention that Volga Bulgaria was the only state to defeat the Mongols.

@emrekucuk4005

5 жыл бұрын

Not realy Memluks were defated the Mongol army as well.

@Bayganu

5 жыл бұрын

Danubian Bulgaria also ambushed and defeated mongols in the Balkan Mountains during Ivan Asen 2 reign

@Alakhana

3 жыл бұрын

The Mamluks sultanate defeated the Mongols and the Delhi Sultanate at the time ruled by sultan Alauddin Khiligi defeated the Mongols on many occasions.

@burakoyundajr502

Жыл бұрын

and the dai viet defeated the mongols

@atillaturk2130

Жыл бұрын

@@Bayganu İVAN ASEN was a christian KUMAN : KIPÇAK TÜRK...............................KUMANOVA city of Macedonia was established by christian KUMAN TÜRKs.............TERTER and ŞİŞMAN Dynasties were also christian KUMAN TÜRKs.............. ...........+++ The first Romanian Prince was BASAR ABA......He was also christian KUMAN: KIPÇAK TÜRK....................Son of TOK TEMİR......................The BESARABİA region was named like that because of BASAR ABA................The ancestor of VLAD TEPEŞ ( DRAKULA )...........................Christian Türk DRAKULA.........................Definetely..........................

И от там не сме дошли, а и от там сме се върнали ;) Там където българинът е минал град е останал ;) Помнете

@Djanbari

4 жыл бұрын

Прабългарите са тюркски племена

@dreadsta001

4 жыл бұрын

@@Djanbari Успех ;)

@sillygoose4460

4 жыл бұрын

5000 subs with 0 videos challenge докажи го

@patlakakolev4165

3 жыл бұрын

@@Djanbari защо говорите глупости???

@EmperorStas

3 жыл бұрын

@@Djanbari, глупости, българите са едни от първите хора на планетата. Тюрките са нямали нищо общо с България. Великата китайска стена е построена за да се предпазят от нас.

We just found out my grandma is half Bulgarian. My mom and I were tested and have 15 to 20 percent west Asian dna ☺️☺️☺️

@user-uk1bi4fp4z

4 жыл бұрын

@ Абе, ти май не схващаш сарказма.

@memories5301

4 жыл бұрын

Turkic claim :)

@papazataklaattiranimam

4 жыл бұрын

Елица Енева Other Bulgarian scholars actively oppose the "Iranian hypothesis".[194][195] According to Raymond Detrez, the Iranian theory is rooted in the periods of anti-Turkish sentiment in Bulgaria and is ideologically motivated.[196]

@papazataklaattiranimam

4 жыл бұрын

Елица Енева en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars

@sillygoose4460

4 жыл бұрын

Sword of Justice Wikipedia isn’t a valid thing. Anyone can edit it you know

every time I look for some Bulgarian history to watch all the Bulgarians say it is a lie. Well Which video is an accurate one?! Do any of you really know the truth. Its so stupid. 5 Bulgarians will say what is true and another 5 will say its lies or that some of it is wrong. My suggestion is for you lot to get this sorted

@ivangushkov3651

8 жыл бұрын

+James Mackenzie This one should be a correct one. The dude speaking is a historian who is held to a very high standard and is generally renowned for getting his facts straight and being objective (i know arguments from authority are not the bestest thing but you know his fame must come from somewhere right?)

@jamesmackenzie3111

8 жыл бұрын

+Ivan Gushkov thank you my friend. Theres no point in trying to learn the language without understanding at least some of the culture. Although there are quite a few thumbs down. I wont ask why

@ivangushkov3651

8 жыл бұрын

James Mackenzie hey of course its not all truth here mate, I personally take everything i watch with a grain of salt... :)

@jamesmackenzie3111

8 жыл бұрын

Ivan Gushkov yes, I see what you mean. I just looked at history of spain. its the same - people disagreeing. Oh well, this vid will be a start I suppose. Ill stay in touch. Im still collating all my words which should take me another 2 weeks or so then I start to study.

@ivangushkov3651

8 жыл бұрын

James Mackenzie what exactly is your connection with Bulgaria? Sounds interesting!

Excellent presentation. Very informative! Thank you for sharing.

In india also so many villages of bulhaara and balayan and bal and bulkhiya also

Bulgarians are descendants of the Iranian Bulgars who were Turkicized in language, but genetically and culturally still completely Iranian and kept some of their Iranian language. Cumans, Avars, and Bulgars were Iranian (Sarmatian) tribes who were Turkicized, and after these groups migrated west, the remnants of their peoples who stayed in the Steppes mixed with the invading Turko-Mongols and were either assimilated or Islamized.

@catch_me_if_you_can6596

6 жыл бұрын

no,their language was indo-european

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Dukagjin 🤣🤣😂😂 f off kid

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

How those Turanid Turkic tribes can be iranian with %0 iranian genetic or culture😂😂😂 As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars ( A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. www.britannica.com/topic/Turkic-languages According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph : www.academia.edu/683028/Classification_of_the_Hunno-Bulgarian_Loan-Words_in_Slavonic Both names are best explained as corresponding to Onogundur, an old name in Greek sources for the Bulgars. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/khazars www.yourdictionary.com/bulgar whc.unesco.org/en/list/981/ www.academia.edu/1902427/The_Islamization_of_the_Volga_Bulghars_A_Question_Reconsidered More Sources: 1drv.ms/w/s!ArU3juYblIHghhn2C4hh-bLC8FRi

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Cumans didn’t look like 👳🏾‍♂️😂😂 Hairy and unibrow

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/mX6lqqZpZb25lrw.html&ab_channel=WION

PROUD BULGARIAN UP IN HERE!

@EmperorStas

3 жыл бұрын

@Mādai if we are not Bulgars, then Greeks aren't ancient Greeks.

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

@Mādai Fake turk Why does turkey betray the real Turks-- The Uighurs

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

@Mādai kzread.info/dash/bejne/mX6lqqZpZb25lrw.html&ab_channel=WION

@delaramsalmassi4063

3 жыл бұрын

@@petertodorov1792 Are Bulgars an Iranic people because the Scythians and Sarmatians and Alans were all Iranic Peoples and Bulgarians are partly an Iranic people and proto - Bulgarians were Iranic people.

@bulgariannationalist1637

2 жыл бұрын

@@delaramsalmassi4063 Hello

Is anybody here actually bulgarian such as myself?

@dominiqueblagojevic9447

5 жыл бұрын

I am part Bulgarian

@HouseOfDulo

4 жыл бұрын

Аз съм Българка

@klecuni

4 жыл бұрын

The Great Nut българи юнаци

@bartoszszczepaniak169

4 жыл бұрын

@Jd Pv No. Bulgarians are Slavic and Bulgars were Turkic.

@todorvranchev2091

3 жыл бұрын

@@bartoszszczepaniak169 okay cry pal

Bulgarians are at the root of world history

@dimitriecantemir5796

7 жыл бұрын

we all are. no one came from Mars.

@gustavodemira7416

7 жыл бұрын

People just want to feel important and relevant, that's all.

@jasminamarjanovic7311

5 жыл бұрын

Alexandur Plamenov Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha

@mev6524

5 жыл бұрын

@Kevin M Bulgarian man made computers.

@thracian2072

4 жыл бұрын

@@mev6524 He was a half-Bulgarian American and didn't speak a word of Bulgarian. Stop exaggerating, Bulgarians.

за съжаление всеки път когато България се е разцепвала, новите държави помежду си са се смятали за 'други' а в последствие 'другите' се отказват да се самонаричат Българи

@Hobott

5 жыл бұрын

Напълно си прав. Чудя се, защо такава страст влагаме да се отричаме от произхода си? В Македония е най-яркото потвърждение на това правило.

@0xe849

4 жыл бұрын

@@Hobott , интересното е, че всички държави от рацепената преди това, които не се наричат Българи изчезват. Като гледам и бракята макета на там са се запътили.

The great Persian scientist Abu Zayd al-Balkhi 850-934 AD Says that Bulgarians worshipped the god EDFU and his idol FA In the same text he says the Turks worshipped BIr Tengri He clearly distinguishes between Bulgarians and Turks M . Tahir, Le livre de la creation de el-Balhi, Paris , 1899 ,v. IV, 56 Look panturks no tengri in Bulgaria

BULGARIA = GREAT INDOEUROPEAN HISTORY

@delaramsalmassi4063

2 жыл бұрын

The Bulgarians came originally from ancient Persia/Iran from a place named Bactria or Balkhara or Balkh.

@petertodorov9540

2 жыл бұрын

@@delaramsalmassi4063 Dear Sister, Bulgarians are East Iranian people from The Tien Shan Area Near Lake Barkol Bark is Iranian for Shinning Bulgarians were the Palkhars/Balkgars/Barkgars The Shinning people related to the Alans

@delaramsalmassi4063

2 жыл бұрын

@@petertodorov9540 Thank you my Dear Aryan/Iranian brother.

@delaramsalmassi4063

2 жыл бұрын

@@petertodorov9540 Is Tien Shan area in China Dear brother?

@delaramsalmassi4063

2 жыл бұрын

@@petertodorov9540 Bulgarian Nationalist told me the Bulgarians were an Aryan/Iranic/Iranian people who came originally from Bactria in English/Latin and Balkhara in Bulgarian and Balkh in Persian/Farsi. Is this really true?

The real Bulgarians they have nothing to do with the Slavs ..completely different race ! Today Danube Bulgarians are completely mixed , so big part of them is also Slavic but they still have the real Bulgarian line back from the old homeland!

@Samperor

9 жыл бұрын

Is it true that Bulgarian have some Asian decent? Beside the Huns conquest.

@saxon193

9 жыл бұрын

Trump Aces I'm not entirely sure what you mean by Asian, but the Bulgars (which most certainly make up some percentage of today's Bulgarians' genes) have their origin in Asia, as you can see in the video. If you're talking about East Asian (Mongoloid, as some people may call it) descent, then yeah, it is true - you can definitely see people with east Asian facial features today in Bulgaria. Huns weren't from east Asia, and most of them most probably didn't look very different from many modern east Europeans/west Asians, although the Romans/Byzantines did describe Attila as having a Mongoloid appearance. The empire of Attila was huge however, and it probably consisted of many different Asian peoples, as well as Europeans (like Germans/Goths), so it's possible that the Huns or the Bulgars (Bulgars were in fact one of the Hunnic tribes - something they don't mention in this biased video) brought some people of east Asian descent with them. There were of course, the later Mongol invasions (13th c.) and Bulgaria was in fact ruled by a Mongol for a year or so.

@saxon193

9 жыл бұрын

Velik_Bulgarin Няма нужда да ме обиждаш. Не съм нито руснак, нито славянин (макар че не отричам че българите имаме и доста славянски гени). Ако ми прочетеш коментара пак ще видиш че не съм казал сме монголи или нещо такова. Съгласен съм като казваш че българите (или прото/пра/или каквото там за да се различават от нас, съвременните българи) имат ирански народ, тва не означава че не са били част от хунското нашествие в Европа (и не само). Мисля че трябва да прочетеш още история И археология от времето на голямото преселение. Не ми е ного ясно как манипулирам хората, не ми е и ясно ти от къде си взимаш сведиения - това за 90-те% дето си го написал в другия коментар не ми е ясно от къде го измисли

@patriotkk9898

9 жыл бұрын

pavel h Пълни глупости си написал. Българите винаги са били индоевропейци. Колкото италианците и французите са източноазиатци, толкова и българите.

@saxon193

9 жыл бұрын

Slavic Kk И какво по-точно означана индоевропейци? Защото езика ни е индоевропейски, за това ли? Ами то и индийците, а и нашите цигани, също са индоевропейци. Истината е че ние българите сме резултат от смесването на много народи от различни етноси, включително и хора от източна Азия, колкото и нищожен да е бил генния им принос. Друг е въпросът колко българи (и не само! Особено и македонците дето обичат да казват че сме били татари) са готови за тази истина. Други тюрко-говорящи групи хора заселили се по нашите земи (ако хуните (и древните българи) въобще са говорили тюркски езици) които не споменах са печенегите и куманите, въпреки че и техния етнос е спорен, отчасти защото в историята куманите са описани като русокоси. Артефактите от територията на Българската империя на страна, има не малко намерени черепи с източно-азиатски черти. Ако не ти се занимава да се поровиш в археологията и историята, и ако живееш в голям град, просто се огледай около себе си съм сигурен че ще видиш поне един/една етнически/а българин/ка с очевидни монголоидни лицеви черти. За да не ме разбереш погрешно - това всичкото което го написах не искам да звучи като че ли смятам че сме монголи или нещо от сорта ;) А до Beelzebub Rules Below , мисля че езика и културата ни са доста славянски

Highly interesting! How much do we know about the contribution of Franjo Rački, a 19th century Croatian historian, to Bulgarian historiography?

@dalia_mar

4 жыл бұрын

Hi Mirjana, unfortunately Racki isn't popular in Bulgaria nor his "contribution". How much do you know about the meaning of your first name,because is the same like my cousins name?

Very interesting, so Bulgaria is an unknown ancient civilization located far away from where it is actually

@user-zs3re6fh4n

3 жыл бұрын

Bulgarian kalendar is oldest 7000 years.

@Anmobgoccult20

Жыл бұрын

@@user-zs3re6fh4n Absolutely YES, The Chines kalendar is a proto Bulgarian kalendar, this is only truth, and ect., ect., ect.!!!!

in the late 1950's, I was in Turkey from USA . My passport had allowed me to visit in Bulgaria but I was not paid much - Eisenhower vetoed small pay raises :)

@user-bm3fq3sm7r

3 жыл бұрын

What do you mean?

God speaks in Bulgarian language.

@thisguy5591

4 жыл бұрын

Nah u wrong. We come from middle asia. Our country was called old great bulgaria. When the nation was shattering Khan Kubrat told his sons to go west and to not to separate from each other. However they separated, the founder of bulgaria Khan Asparuh came through Dunav and told that the place he stands is going to be called Bulgaria. His brothers also founded countries but later they got destroyed . So some time passed and Bulgarians discovered that there is seven tribes called slavs. At the time they were attacked by the remainting part of roman empire and they decided to unite. In other word my friend you are completely wrong and if u come in Bulgaria and say that ur going out in a coffin

@thisguy5591

4 жыл бұрын

macedonia is Bulgaria macedonia is Bulgaria

@thisguy5591

3 жыл бұрын

KONSTANTIN XXX thats the point u search from Wikipedia place that everyone can write whatever the fuck they want. Pls just don’t try to convince me that macedonia isn’t Bulgaria

@thisguy5591

3 жыл бұрын

@Just Man can u give me link where u got that information. It also has to be approved by historic. Not online Historic tho, a real one with a degree

@thisguy5591

3 жыл бұрын

Just Man This romania in 10 minutes not bulgaria

Има една държава Велика много Велика казва се България 🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬❤

@radoslavpetkov

Жыл бұрын

Много, но велика я правим ние! А, когато имаме,, ние,, то тогава имаме всичко, защото ние сме нация от,, индивидуалисти,,!

My dear neighbors: all we have are the theories... we are complicated... I am glad to see how Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey etc. know better than is who are we 😀😀😀 Go and think about your origins and leave ours to us

@deckard901

6 жыл бұрын

Haus some say that we came from Iran, other from Volga. Some say that we were here before Bulgaria was even established and the Bulgars escaped the Balkan Peninsula because of some nature factors and after that we returned here. There are different theories... but they are all theories and even we can’t prove them on 100%. As I said- everyone is different

@Anmobgoccult20

4 жыл бұрын

@ Bravo!

@thisguy5591

4 жыл бұрын

Hahahahahahah bro 8th and 9th century for us was called the golden century. We had lands laying on three seas

@mirceadacialorantbrescia4340

3 жыл бұрын

Being a Turk is nothing to be ashamed of. Your ancestors were slavized

@spermatanaronito1233

3 жыл бұрын

@@mirceadacialorantbrescia4340 we not this is propaganda :D

Fun Fact Bulgaria is Indo European

@geforcebg4256

Жыл бұрын

Какво е indo-European?

@Kanasubigi896

Ай бұрын

Indo european language family

Бог да го прости🙏 Rip Profesor Dimitrov.

i think in the past bulgarians were related to Iranic tribes such as :sarmatians,is that right?

@petertodorov1792

2 жыл бұрын

Yes Bulgarians are Sarmatians like the Ossetians but their language is Slavisized

@Secular_Iran_GE

2 жыл бұрын

@@petertodorov1792 interesting,yeah i know they are slavic right now,but some people say that they were proto turkic people,is that right?

@Timurid1370

2 жыл бұрын

@@Secular_Iran_GE bulgars were turkic at first but bulgars who moved to balkans mixed with iranian sarmatians and eventually slavized. Bulgars who moved to north founded volga bulgar state and kept their turkicness

@petertodorov1792

2 жыл бұрын

@@Timurid1370 NONSENSE Bulgarians were never Turkic 1.Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show Tengrinism in Bulgaria 2.Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show the name Bulgarian comes from Bulgamak

@petertodorov1792

2 жыл бұрын

@@Secular_Iran_GE Bulgarians were never Turkic Bulgarians worshiped the Iranian god Siavush who was Slavisized to Siva Bog and Christianized to St. George

I wonder what will come out if I make a DNA test. I am Bulgarian a very mixed one. Maybe I have some Asian in me as well.. Hummm

@kozz43

5 жыл бұрын

Ruru Lorey himalaisko hahaha

@Artisticwhit

3 жыл бұрын

I did not know I was Bulgarian.. but South/ east Asian and indian showed up on my dna test as well.

@LoreyRuru

3 жыл бұрын

OK so I made a DNA test... 47% Balkan, 35 Greek, 13% Asia (China,Bhutan, India mixed )... some Finish and Ashkenazi Jews 😀 for the rest

@Kanasubigi896

Ай бұрын

Dna tests aren’t accurate they are honestly a scam

Nagyon hasonlít a magyar őstörténelemre. Szerintem egy nép, csak másik törzs.

@Anmobgoccult20

4 жыл бұрын

Absolyutly,

you as historian ar by laghing. utigurs and kutrigurs have stone towns? sorry where they are??? goths are getae dacians next rumuns. in one fact you are right.they come from Asia the original asiatic bulgars disippeard but not because mixed with Alexander soldiers,in Afganistan in fact is because the Basil the Bulgarocton(bulgars killer) wich hunted with passion all asiatic features. one question for you mister historian? do you think your

@catch_me_if_you_can6596

6 жыл бұрын

they are destroyed - the armenian writer at that time write about them basil ii had no interest in asiac feaures and also bulgarians have nothing to do with turiks or slavs

Александър Македонски друг път е покорил българите.

@user-iw5pu6mu6i

8 жыл бұрын

Съжалявам моя грешка.

@Beatusable

7 жыл бұрын

Alexander was BULGARIAN!

@dannypantazis8461

7 жыл бұрын

aleksandur makedonski ne e potrqbval da gi pokori kato cqlo shtoto sa saglasiha da budat negovi i da se priemat v negovata empariq .. ne e imala voina

@dannypantazis8461

7 жыл бұрын

i alexander ne e imal nishto obshto s bulgaria sushto.

@kal1nas

7 жыл бұрын

Ами като за начало Александър Македонски е умрял хиляда години преди Българите да стигнат Европа :) (Управление: 336-10 юни 323 г. пр. н. е.) Това е все едно да кажеш че викингите не са могли да покорят Съветския Съюз.

МОЛЯ ДА ПРЕВЕДЕТЕ НА АНГИЙСКИ,ДУМИТЕ НА ЕДИН БЪЛГАРОФИЛ,ПРЕЗИДЕНТ НА ФРАНЦИЯ: ФРАНСОА МИТЕРАН----''БЪЛГАРИТЕ СА В ОСНОВАТА НА ЧОВЕШКАТА ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИЯ''!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-ФАКТ.

@yellowhammer9103

6 жыл бұрын

Svetoslavъ Panayotovъ .Превод,,,,Bulgarians are the fondation of human history".

@patlakakolev4165

3 жыл бұрын

@@yellowhammer9103 why you think like that?

@MaFaViC

Жыл бұрын

Извадка от интервю на френския президент Франсоа Митеран (може да се намери на сайта на френското президентство):"...Moi je forme beaucoup de voeux pour le peuple bulgare pour lequel j'ai, en le connaissant un peu, pas assez bien entendu, une vraie sympathie. Je ne connais pas assez, non plus, sa culture mais je sais de quelle façon il fait vraiment partie des peuples fondamentaux, de ceux qui ont fait la civilisation de notre continent. "...

if turkish people are descandes of Oghuz Khan than north macedonians are descandes of Alexandar the Great hahahhahahahhaha

people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/jordgeti.html#huns this is the Getica of Jordan, writen in 551 ac, and there is said that Tracia is created after the Guds (Goths, gets, los godos) went from the Lithuania- Kaliningrad- Poland part of Europe, were was Scandza located where Vysla(Vystula) goes into the Baltic sea. There were 3 big migrations- 4000 years ago, befor war of Troy, then when Dacia created (approx 500 bc) and then after the christ to the Black sea where Ukraina is now. Even the Herodotus mentioned in his history that there were Tracs- alies of Troy ( and probably they set up the Troy) and after the defeat of Troy they set up the Rome. And because of the Getae (Goths, Guds, Tracs) the Bulgaria kingdom was able to born and Kievan Russia also- because the Aryans from Lithuania had the knowledge and experience and the power to create the States. Later Grand Duchy of Lithuania set up also

I'm sorry, may be i must to use or speak indonesian language : " Sedikit memberi penjelasan kepada anda bahwa tidak semua fenotip fisik orang asia adalah mongoloid ( kulit kuning, mata sipit, wajah bulat lebar, hidung pesek ada juga yang sedikit mancung, rambut hitam lurus, bertubuh pendek ), saya rasa penjelasan anda itu lebih tertuju kepada ciri fisik orang china, mongol, tibet, dan orang orang asia timur lainnya. Dalam catatan china kuno ciri ciri bangsa turki sebenarnya ( karena sebagian besar bangsa turki dahulu pernah menempati wilayah tersebut tepatnya di wilayah china uatara dan barat, seperti suku oghuz, suku uygur, suku, suku tatar, suku karluk, suku kuman , suku kipchak dan suku suku turki lainnya ) berkulit putih, kelopak mata normal tidak sipit, wajah tidak terlalu lebar namun lebih oval, hidung mancung sedang bahkan juga ada yang lebih mancung, rambut bergelombang namun juga ada yang lurus, warna rambut bervariasi ( ada yang hitam, coklat, merah bahkan pirang ), warna bola mata juga bervariasi tidak seperti kebanyakan orang asia pada umumnya ( ada yang coklat muda, abu abu, hijau, biru, almound ), sekian dulu karena ini hanya permulaan bukan berarti selesai.

@vasil.kamdzhalov

4 жыл бұрын

That's because we were told that we come of such chinese type of asian.

@visaepradana4271

3 жыл бұрын

Yap, kata orang awam Asia identik dengan sipit , pesek, kuning Langsat, padahal Asia lebih beraneka ragam😄

Браћо Бугари, смирите страсти! У сваком случају, англо-саксонци владају и над Вама и над нама Србима и свим осталим Словенима. Уместо да се свађамо и ратујемо међусобно, требало би да сарађујемо.

@yordanmadzharov849

4 жыл бұрын

Та ние сме братя какво да се сваджамо (караме) Дунавска България Ви обича 💕 всички по света независимо от вяра цвят и прочее,,, КАЗАХ!

Чак ми идва да се разплача след тоя клип. Нещата които учих от 2008 до 2020 година нямат нищо общо... Никога не се бях замислял логически как едно малка група на Аспарух ще воюва с Византия, та и да спечели.

@yanibozev2515

Жыл бұрын

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab%E2%80%93Byzantine_wars има определено пристрастие от професора, тъй като Източната Римска Империя по това време е водила друга битка, която той дори не споменава. Честно казано ме разочарова, защото се смеем на Македонците, а ние сме същите относно нашата история - промити от комунистическия режим.

@geforcebg4256

Жыл бұрын

Комунистически режим няма приятел. Сега живееш във пропаднал Хамериканска Демокрация и сме на дъното по-всичко.. Така, че не обиждай комунизма като не си живял по-негово време. В комунизма беше рай и хората живяха добре..

@Anmobgoccult20

Жыл бұрын

@@yanibozev2515 Bravo, that is! Браво, така е, но не само от комунистическият болшевишки режим, в крадливата расия, която изопачи, пренаписа и омаскари цялата Българска история, това са фактите, има карти пазени, който 3-я Райх ги е изнамерил и пазил, после , незнайно как са запазени и сега намират път, повечето са публикувани в черният интернет/там не си и не можете да влезете, поне с това което ползвате!!!! Самите византийци гърци, също са си позволявали да изопачават нашата история несъмнено как, но това, което направиха от болшевишкият кремъл, относно нашата история, е мазало, няма държава и пр., която толко нагло и с успех пренаписва българската ни история, НАМА, но хората са с промит мозък, дори и добри и интелигентни люде, още защитават русия и идеята й, няма как, така са учили, лошото е, че след като им се казва, те пак си знаят същото, ЗАПОМНЕТЕ това!!! Българите са владетели на Ариянският дух и един ден трябва света да научи за велика България, срещу, която има заговор, не случайно, да сме глуха пътека и най-не извергнатият народ от индивидуалисти!!!

@radoslavpetkov

6 ай бұрын

Не тъжи Николай! Ние,пак ще бъдем велики! Никой няма да превземаме,просто сами ще искат да бъдат българи,тези които имат очи да видят и тези ,които има уши да чуят ...

And from this teory we get some questions. We know that Volga Bulgaria was one of the 3 most powerfull countries in the world. Why they didnt take back the lost teritory if this 2 countryes were so powerfull? Why Asparuh atack Roman Empire, when he know about the agreement? Why the belive about Tangra is found in house of Kubrat? Why no one say anything about a hudge country like that? How Asparuh lost so much of teritory on north whit such a powerfull army? And 1 very important question, why Asparuh take control of the west part of the country, when he have 3 bigger brothers?

Violin, didn't you invent the violin?

Lmao at all people trying to debunk the information of this video, as if you have any choice over your roots. This makes Bulgarians no different from the Macedonians in reality if this behavior is representative of their general population. The Turkic, Slavic and Thracian origin stories are all wrong and proven wrong in detail here, and you ignore all of it because the fact that you're related to some Asiatic people you used to think were Arabs or "Gypsies" upsets your Eurocentric weak minds. Dimitrov remains one of the most acclaimed historians of Bulgaria after his death, however much how of a self-employed political agent he was.

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

BulgaroSlav this video is product of bulgarian nationalism As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars ( A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. www.britannica.com/topic/Turkic-languages According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph : www.academia.edu/683028/Classification_of_the_Hunno-Bulgarian_Loan-Words_in_Slavonic Both names are best explained as corresponding to Onogundur, an old name in Greek sources for the Bulgars. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/khazars www.yourdictionary.com/bulgar whc.unesco.org/en/list/981/ www.academia.edu/1902427/The_Islamization_of_the_Volga_Bulghars_A_Question_Reconsidered More Sources: 1drv.ms/w/s!ArU3juYblIHghhn2C4hh-bLC8FRi

@KeyhanTheFreeman

3 жыл бұрын

@Sword of Justice Let it go.

@delaramsalmassi4063

2 жыл бұрын

@BulgaroSlav I have spoken to 5 to 6 Bulgarians in the last 2 years and one of them is Peter Todorov and the other is Bulgarian Nationalist and they both told me Bulgarians are an Aryan/Iranic/Iranian people. Is this true or not?

@delaramsalmassi4063

Жыл бұрын

@wratch-gd2jq You are most likely a pan - Turk or a zionist to say such things!

The Volga Bulgars were a Turkic-speaking people who established the second Muslim state in Europe (after the Emirate of Córdoba) in the early fourth/tenth century and ruled over extensive lands and a wide array of people around the middle Volga and Kama Rivers between the second/ninth and early seventh/thirteenth centuries. The Bulgars acted as middlemen between Central Asian merchants and the Rus, and the northern, mainly Finno-Ugric tribes whose main trading commodity was fur, which was greatly valued as a luxury item throughout the Islamic world. *Mako, Gerald. “The Conversion of the Volga Bulgars: Aḥmad b. Faḍlān b. Al-ʿAbbās b. Rāshid b. Ḥammād (Fl. Fourth/Tenth Century).” Conversion to Islam in the Premodern Age: A Sourcebook, edited by Nimrod Hurvitz et al., 1st ed., University of California Press, Oakland, California, 2020, pp. 156-159.* The period is marked by the migration of the final “permanent residents” of the Balkan Peninsula to the region: these were, most important-because eventually most numerous-the Slavs, but also the Turks (first Bulgars and then Ottomans) *Wachtel, Andrew. “Early Balkan Everyday Life.” Everyday Life in the Balkans, edited by DAVID W. MONTGOMERY, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, 2019, pp. 9-21.* The Samara is the last westward migrations and military campaigns of, first, the significant tributary of the Volga; past the Samara, the rivers Turkic-speaking Bulgars *Mochalov, Oleg D., et al. “Historic Records of the Economy and Ethnic History of the Samara Region.” A Bronze Age Landscape in the Russian Steppes: The Samara Valley Project, edited by Oleg D. Mochalov et al., Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA, 2016, pp. 63-70.* The Volga Bulgars , a settled Turkic people, were a society that practiced Islam on the Eurasian steppe *“Siberia in Eurasian Context.” The Merchants of Siberia: Trade in Early Modern Eurasia, by Erika Monahan, 1st ed., Cornell University Press, 2016, pp. 71-104.* The Turkic Bulgars were among the first to benefit from the region’s commercial advantages by settling it in the fifth century c.e. and found- ing the city of Bolgar *“THE KAZAN SCHOOL.” Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration, by David Schimmelpenninck Van der Oye, Yale University Press, New Haven; London, 2010, pp. 93-121.* The confluence of the Volga and Kama rivers, to the east, was inhabited by the Bulgars, a Turkic people, and the southeastern steppes by the Khazars, another Turkic people who had formed a strong state in the seventh century, *“Russian Expansion in Kievan Times.” Eastward to Empire: Exploration and Conquest on the Russian Open Frontier to 1750, by George V. Lantzeff and Richard A. Pierce, McGill-Queen's University Press, MONTREAL; LONDON, 1973, pp. 21-30.* The Huns of the Western Steppe appear to have formed an element of the later Danubian Bulgars, a Turkic people who, under Asparukh, moved into the Balkans in 680 and founded *“The Age of Attila the Hun.” Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present, by CHRISTOPHER I. BECKWITH, Princeton University Press, Princeton; Oxford, 2009, pp. 93-111.* In the mid- ninth century Khan Boris ruled a pagan Bulgaria that was composed of both Turkic Bulgars and Slavs. *“The Micro-Christendom of Rus'.” Reimagining Europe, by Christian Raffensperger, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, 2012, pp. 136-185.* the Turkic -speaking Volga- Kama Bulgars *“Muslims in Europe: Precedent and Present.” Muslims of Europe: The 'Other' Europeans, by H. A. Hellyer, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2009, pp. 101-120.* the Bulgars( Turkic speakers who invaded the Balkans in the seventh century) *“Round Two: The Rise and Spread of Agricultural Societies.” The Next World War: Tribes, Cities, Nations, and Ecological Decline, by ROY WOODBRIDGE, University of Toronto Press, 2004, pp. 49-58.* served as the secretary of an embassy sent by the Caliph al- Muqtadir to the king of the Turkish Bulgars then living on the lower reaches of the Volga River north of the Caspian Sea. *“THE BIG CHILL.” Cotton, Climate, and Camels in Early Islamic Iran: A Moment in World History, by Richard W. Bulliet, Columbia University Press, NEW YORK, 2009, pp. 69-95.* Turkic -speaking Bulgars into the region now known as Bulgaria failed to alter its predominantly Slavic char- acter. The Bulgar ruling class eventually abandoned its Thrkic language and adopted Slavic so completely that no trace of Turkicspeech patterns can be found in any Old Slavic texts. *“Languages and Literatures.” East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500, by JEAN W. SEDLAR, University of Washington Press, Seattle; London, 1994, pp. 421-457.* Byzantine power was challenged by Thrkic-speaking Bulgars from the Ukrainian steppe who carved out a tribal state from the empire's Balkan lands. *“Foreign Affairs.” East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500, by JEAN W. SEDLAR, University of Washington Press, Seattle; London, 1994, pp. 362-400.* When the Turkic -speaking Bulgars first occupied their present *“Nobles and Landholders.” East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500, by JEAN W. SEDLAR, University of Washington Press, Seattle; London, 1994, pp. 58-83.* and with the Turkic people, the Bulgars , on the east bank of the Volga. *“Conclusions.” Eastward to Empire: Exploration and Conquest on the Russian Open Frontier to 1750, by George V. Lantzeff and Richard A. Pierce, McGill-Queen's University Press, MONTREAL; LONDON, 1973, pp. 221-230.* alleged to be constructions of the Turkic Bulgars , are notable. *Pundeff, Marin. “Bulgarian Historiography, 1942-1958.” The American Historical Review, vol. 66, no. 3, 1961, pp. 682-693.* They colonised areas of the eastern Balkans and in the seventh century other Slav tribes combined with the Proto-Bulgars, a group of Turkic origin, to launch a fresh assault into the Balkans. *Crampton, R. (2005). THE BULGARIAN LANDS FROM PREHISTORY TO THE ARRIVAL OF THE BULGARIANS. In A Concise History of Bulgaria (Cambridge Concise Histories, pp. 1-8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.*

@petertodorov9540

3 жыл бұрын

Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

@geforcebg4256

Жыл бұрын

Volga Bulgars are not Turkic dont reak wikipedia is fake and propaganda.. :)

@FurkanRynsfia

11 ай бұрын

Bulgaria was founded and named by the Turks. This is well known outside the Bulgaria. But today's Bulgaria is mostly made up of Slavs and Thracians. You can believe whatever you want to believe..but that's the truth.Bulgaria's choice of Christianity and close relations with Byzantium has shaped the new bulgarians.Bulgarians of today don't want to accept their founders as Turks because of Ottoman hostility. Hence the today's Bulgarian people have nothing to do with the Turks anyway

@srabyaaybarsov8132

8 ай бұрын

@@geforcebg4256 Well most of his resources were not from Wikipedia; albeit if you want more proof you can just read the tombstones of Volga Bulgars... If you can.

@petertodorov1792

2 ай бұрын

@@srabyaaybarsov8132 NONSENSE Volga Bulgarians were not turkic They were turkified by the constant Oghuz and Kipchak migrations

However the linguistic impact of the Iranian world on the Turkic Bulgars is indisputable. For instance the name of the founder of Danubian Bulgaria was Asparukh, which is old Iranian in origin: "The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe", Hyun Jin Kim, Cambridge University Press, 2013, ISBN 1107009065, p. 68.

@alexandernaydenov7539

3 жыл бұрын

KOPIUM

@Gotse.Delchev.Reborn

6 ай бұрын

Nice propaganda, in reality: National Library of Medicine (US Government) - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

Good video! English translation is not perfect but the content is mostly historically sound. The Bulgars were definitely not Turks - they were Iranians (Persians) and not in anyway related to the Mongolian Turks. They only accepted their supremacy for political reasons and to survive. However for a very short period of time. In their country of origin - Bulchara ( the Persian province of Bactria) to this day there is clear distinction between Persians and Turko- Mongolians (who settled there at a later stage). Ask any Pashtun (biggest ethnicity in Afghanistan) if they are the same as the Khazara people (Mongolians) and they would point you to their ancient and very different cultures.

@yaqubleis6311

5 жыл бұрын

Daniel Culpepper Bulgars were Iranic peoples by origin both Persians and Bulgars were Iranic peoples by origin even the name Krum is of Iranic origin

@merketarif126

5 жыл бұрын

Why have they used the Kayi Symbol of Oguz Branch, Dude? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kay%C4%B1_tribe

@Email5507

4 жыл бұрын

they were turks you idiot

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

ÖLÜMLÜHAYATBUGÜNVARSINYARINYOKSUN As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars ( A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. www.britannica.com/topic/Turkic-languages According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph : www.academia.edu/683028/Classification_of_the_Hunno-Bulgarian_Loan-Words_in_Slavonic Both names are best explained as corresponding to Onogundur, an old name in Greek sources for the Bulgars. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/khazars www.yourdictionary.com/bulgar whc.unesco.org/en/list/981/ www.academia.edu/1902427/The_Islamization_of_the_Volga_Bulghars_A_Question_Reconsidered More Sources: 1drv.ms/w/s!ArU3juYblIHghhn2C4hh-bLC8FRi

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

@@papazataklaattiranimam Its so sweet the way you and Fatlinda Islami post together It's like you are walking down the street holding hands

We are Bulgarians.We are real warriors! We are not turks WE ARE BULGARIANS

@mehreally9673

6 жыл бұрын

Floki Vilgerðarson no

@ismailguler6048

5 жыл бұрын

Who said you are turk? Claiming Bulgarians are Turkic is an ignorant issue. But even in this video say that Bulgars and Bulgarians are same and Bulgars are not Turkic , that's not propoer knowledge. Bulgars were Turkic and they have created Great Bulgaria, but before Bulgars came to these lands, there had been a local people. They were called Thracians. İf Bulgars didn't make an Empire there. Your name would have been Thracian, that's it. Bulgars were just a aristocrat ruling class, but the people were not Turkic. -So are Bulgarians used to be Turkic and lost their identity? No they have never been Turkic either, maybe bulgars lost their identity but we don't know what happened to them. -Are Bulgarians and Bulgars same thing? Absolutely not, This new theory doesn't work and i don't know why do they make up this theory.

@user-vb1rv2lz5l

5 жыл бұрын

Ismail güler have you heard about the bulgars ? Huh huh HUH?!???

@mladenangelov4186

5 жыл бұрын

Wea are not turks,but Kubrat was hun.Khan is turkic word

@user-hr9jy8ru1g

5 жыл бұрын

@@mladenangelov4186 Kubrat and Asparuh Han Its Turkic name and Blood

Bulgars were Onogur Turks according to Bulgars🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂 Old Great Bulgaria or Great Bulgaria (Byzantine Greek: Παλαιά Μεγάλη Βουλγαρία, Palaiá Megálē Voulgaría), also often known by the Latin names Magna Bulgaria[3] and Patria Onoguria ("Onogur land"),[4] was a 7th-century state formed by the Onogur Bulgars on the western Pontic-Caspian steppe (modern southern Ukraine and southwest Russia).[5] Great Bulgaria was originally centered between the Dniester and lower Volga. Later Byzantine scholars implied that the Bulgars had previously been known as the Onogurs (Onoğur). Agathon wrote about the "nation of Onogur Bulğars"],Nikephoros I stated that Kubrat was lord of the Onogundurs, Theophanes referred to them as Onogundur Bulgars and Constantine VII remarked that the Bulgars formerly called themselves Onogundurs. Variations of the name include Onoguri, Onoghuri, Onghur, Ongur, Onghuri, Onguri, Onogundur, Unogundur, and Unokundur. There are several theories about the origin of the name Onogur. In some Turkic languages on means "10" and ğur "arrow"; and "ten arrows" might imply a federation of ten tribes, i.e. the Western Turkic Khaganate. Within the Turkic languages, "z" sounds in the easternmost languages tend to have become "r" in the westernmost Turkic languages; therefore, the ethnonym Oghuz may be the source of Oghur; that is, on Oğur would mean "ten clans of Oghuz". Old Great Bulgaria (Magna Bulgaria[29]), also known as Onoghundur-Bulgars state, or Patria Onoguria in the Ravenna Cosmography.[30][31][20] Constantine VII (mid-10th century) remarked that the Bulgars formerly called themselves Onogundurs.[32] Both names are best explained as corresponding to Onogundur, an old name in Greek sources for the Bulgars. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/khazars Nikephoros I stated that Kubrat was lord of the Onogundurs, Theophanes referred to them as Onogundur Bulgars and Constantine VIIremarked that the Bulgars formerly called themselves Onogundurs. Variations of the name include Onoguri, Onoghuri, Onghur, Ongur, Onghuri, Onguri, Onogundur, Unogundur, and Unokundur.

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/mX6lqqZpZb25lrw.html&ab_channel=WION

@Gotse.Delchev.Reborn

6 ай бұрын

Nice propaganda, in reality: National Library of Medicine (US Government) - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

Bulgaria is oldest country in Europe. Bulgaria is first national state in Europe which adopt Christianity and Bulgarian church became first national independent church in Europe in year 927. Bulgarians created Bulgarian Civilization with Bulgarian language, Bulgarian alphabet Cyrillic and Orthodox Christianity. Bulgarians spread Christianity and the Bible, translated into Bulgarian language and written in Cyrillic, among the so-called "Slavs" and incorporated most of the "Slavs" into Bulgarian civilization, including the Russians. All so-called "Slavic" languages are created on the basis of Bulgarian language. Russian language and so-called "Slavic" languages on the Balkans are dialects of Bulgarian language. Today about 300 million people in Eurasia including Russia use Bulgarian writing system Cyrillic as the official alphabet. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bulgarian_Empire en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeon_I_of_Bulgaria en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrillic_script

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Jd Pv As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars ( A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. www.britannica.com/topic/Turkic-languages According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph : www.academia.edu/683028/Classification_of_the_Hunno-Bulgarian_Loan-Words_in_Slavonic Both names are best explained as corresponding to Onogundur, an old name in Greek sources for the Bulgars. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/khazars www.yourdictionary.com/bulgar whc.unesco.org/en/list/981/ www.academia.edu/1902427/The_Islamization_of_the_Volga_Bulghars_A_Question_Reconsidered More Sources: 1drv.ms/w/s!ArU3juYblIHghhn2C4hh-bLC8FRi

@stars5206

3 жыл бұрын

@@papazataklaattiranimam Bulgarians are Thracians, Roman historians write, and plenty of historical sources, archeology and Bulgarian folklore and traditions prove that. The father of history, Herodotus, writes that the Thracians are the most numerous people in the world after the Indians. The Thracians are the local population of Southeast Europe and inhabit vast territories in southeastern Europe and all the present-day peoples of the Balkan Peninsula, Asia Minor, Romania, Moldova, western half of today's Ukraine are heirs to the Thracians and Illyrians. Today's Bulgaria is located in the center of the Thracian Sea. First Bulgarian Empire succeeded in uniting most of the Thracian tribes. The Thracians created the first civilization in Europe and one of the oldest civilization in the world. The ancestors of the Greeks, the Achaeans came from Asia in the Balkans in the Thracian lands, 4000 years ago. The Thracian ancestors of the Bulgarians built the first cities in Europe, which are 8000 years old and created the first civilization in Europe. The Bulgarian capital Sofia is 8000 years old and is the oldest capital in Europe. Plovdiv the second biggest city in Bulgaria is 8000 years old and is the oldest living city in Europe and the sixth oldest city on the world. Proto-Bulgarians do not exist in any historical source and were invented by the Austro-Hungarian Empire for geopolitical reasons in the 19th century. Slavs do not exist in any historical source and were invented in the 18th century by Russian Empress Catherine the Great for geopolitical reasons. If you show me one historical source in which writes about Proto-Bulgarians before 19th century and Slavs before 18 century and that the Bulgarians are turkic and have the title of Khan, I will give you $ 1000. Read and educate yourself and stop writing nonsense!

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t care what Bulgarians are,i meaning bulgars

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Jd Pv yes

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Jd Pv also fake country greece created by german prince Otto🤣🤣🤣

In Silesia is tale that Silesia has been founded by Bulgari. Before in Silesia was Hrobracki kraj. After bulgarian co quest name has been renamed to Shild'laśya. But some ages later bulgarian bad ruling. And Silesian rise up. Silesian defeat Bulgari and create Great Moravia with Bohems and Nitrate people. Its real? I don't know. No witted proofs. But I believe that in every story or tale is some true.

@kensei232

5 жыл бұрын

Not "Bulgari" - what you wrote was about the Avars!

@vasil.kamdzhalov

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting.

24:05 "борави", г-н професоре

Bizant = Vízönt. magyarul vízöntő városának nevezték a Boszporusz partján lévő települést, ahol a két tenger közt átömlik a víz.

I think Bulgars descent from North Iranian Persians who escaped the fall of the Achemidian Empire and began to live in the Caucass regions of Asia.

@chochopav

7 жыл бұрын

Forget the persian idea...

@yaqubleis6311

6 жыл бұрын

RLDragonStrider Bulgars are Iranic peoples according to many historians just like Persians, Pashtuns, Ossetians, Jats etc

@MatthewZmusician209

5 жыл бұрын

Robert Stennett actually bulgar comes from “burger” they come from Germanic tribes, that’s where they get there white looks (this is a joke obviously they are Slavic)

@sasha-chan5461

5 жыл бұрын

Robert Stennett bulgarians aren’t slavic we have less than 10% blonde hair,light eyes and fair skin....

@sasha-chan5461

5 жыл бұрын

I don’t judge by my looks cuz Im half bulgarian (half black) but i live in Bulgaria and that what I see around me ain’t no slavs

Крайно време е да спрат споровете, защото малкото което е останало е на изчезване

For those of you arguing in the comment section- here is what science has to say www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3590186/

@catch_me_if_you_can6596

6 жыл бұрын

this is false science - the genethic tests are a lie,but how stupid u must be to believe them?

@TeymurKhan571

4 жыл бұрын

Bulgars=\=Bulgarians they have nothing to do with each other

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Nomadic troll this article what she sent written by nationalist bulgarian😅😂

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

D B As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars ( A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. www.britannica.com/topic/Turkic-languages According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph : www.academia.edu/683028/Classification_of_the_Hunno-Bulgarian_Loan-Words_in_Slavonic Both names are best explained as corresponding to Onogundur, an old name in Greek sources for the Bulgars. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/khazars www.yourdictionary.com/bulgar whc.unesco.org/en/list/981/ www.academia.edu/1902427/The_Islamization_of_the_Volga_Bulghars_A_Question_Reconsidered More Sources: 1drv.ms/w/s!ArU3juYblIHghhn2C4hh-bLC8FRi

@petertodorov1792

Жыл бұрын

Hanim 1. Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show the name Bulgarian comes from bulgamak? 2. Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show tengrinism in Bulgaria?

Is your mother a Thracian? :))))))

Ha-ha this is the same word by word for huns, magyars, and bulgars (hun-gar, bul-gar, mah-gar, kan-gar (ka-an-gar) and the horse archer tactic is called parthian-tactic in the byzantine history books. Everything is identical, lifestyle, clothing, weapons, cemeteries, and yes even the language too, because if the names, military ranks etc are the same then the language is the same, it's not require a genius to find that out. The early middle age priests played a game with us, namely the great timeline alteration by the bad synchronization of the different calendars game or the - I will write your history in a foreign language with foreign data if you don't mind - game.

@Bayganu

5 жыл бұрын

What are military titles of hungarians?

@javorkostov5128

4 жыл бұрын

Finally! Bulgars, Magyars, Avars and Huns were one big confederation IV-VI century AD (called The Hun empire by the westerners, because they were not able to distinguish all the tribes that this confederation included). After the disintegration of this empire all tribes spread and started their own wars. The Avars established themselves in Panonia. The Bulgars were recognised by the Eastern Roman Empire(Byzantine Empire) as independent country as Magna Bulgaria under Khan Kubrat in 635 AD , because it was very often ally to them against the Goths. Magyars started to appear in Europe a little later after Bulgaria in Alliance with Charlemagne destroyed the Avar Khaganate in 9th century AD and divided their lands 50/50 with the Frankish empire. This created a vacuum in Panonia - the borders between Bulgarian empire and Frankish empire - scarcely populated land devastated by long years of wars. Here the Magyars will fill that vacuum and establish themselves firm. But in general all Magyars , Avars and Bulgars were part of the Attila confederation and were raiding under his banner. There are not only turkic people here - there is a mix of many tribes - iranians, sarmatians, germanic and slavic tribes also took part in it. It was not the ethnic groups or the religion that created this confederation, but the leadership of the khans. As long as you are good and loyal soldier/subject, no matter your ethnic group or religion , you are worthy of being called a Hun , Bulgar or Magyar. To prove yourself on the battlefield was much more important as to ethnicity or religion. This was a warrior"s confederation, not homogenic and very diverse.

@vasil.kamdzhalov

4 жыл бұрын

We historicaly didn't have that great of archers, more sword type.

@Anmobgoccult20

4 жыл бұрын

Bravo, respect from old BG.

@apo.7898

4 жыл бұрын

@@javorkostov5128 Avars had a more eastern origin. It is now proven with data. They share haplotypes with groups like Buryats, the elites had Y-DNA N and Q. Bulgars though were placed exactly where the Classical Scythians and Sarmatians were placed, especially the lower Don, the Kuban river, parts of Crimea I think. I think there was a migration from Europe > Central Asia and back to Europe but before the Iron Age.

първо: ЩОМ ГОВОРИШ ЗА ЧИСТА НАЦИЯ НЕ четеш това което ти пиша за ЧИСТА НАЦИ МОЖЕ ДА ГОВОРИМ ОТ 6 ВЕК ПРЕДИ ТОВА НЯМАМЕ ФОРМИРАНН БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕТНОС второ: за Турците В българия съм ти дал достатачно доказателства впредишните ми постове АДЕ ЧЕТИ Мидхат Паш.Той е бил образован човек, завършил Сорбоната и в статия във френско списание през 1868 година пише: В днешните български земи има около милион, милион и нещо мюсюлманско население, което няма нищо общо с турския етнос, а това са мюсюлмани, наследници на ислямизирани, по-често насилствено, българи. АКО ИСКАШ ДА СПОРИШ СПОРИ С МИДХАТ ПАША НЕ С МЕН една от най-големите и опасни заблуди у нас е, че има някакви български турци. Първото следствие от тази измама е свързано с претенциите на Турция да брани техните интереси, което тя с превелико удоволствие прави. До степен да се е обзавела у нас със своя „пета колона” и чрез нея да оказва често силно влияние в свой интерес върху нашата външна и вътрешна политика. Трябва да отбележим, че в същата посока действа и руската дипломация, която на Балканите има за своя основна политическа линия да не допусне възраждането на Голяма България отпреди падането ни под Османско владичество. След Освобождението в Североизточна България при първото преброян;ване на населението като турци са се определили само около 4 хиляди души и 105 хиляди като татари. Впоследствие под руски натиск и главно поради користните теснопартийни интереси на българските политици тези татари са се превърнали в турци. За сведение на неизкушените в нашата истинска история, татарите само преди около 200 години са наричани карабулгар, те са наши кръвни родственици, приели исляма за разлика от нас в Дунавска България. Заселили са се в тази част на страната ни по различно време, но най-нагъсто през ХVІІ век. Т. нар. турци в Южна България и особено в Източните Родопи са потомци на ислямизирани българи пак през същото столетие. Фактът, че това е станало предимно като доброволен акт, не променя нещата. И тези хора там са потомци на българи, те са наши кръвни братя и сестри. Те са помаци, които са позабравили това, защото говорят на някакъв стар турско-български диалект. Ето го и обяснението на обстоятелството, че между българите и „българските турци” няма наслоена злоба, няма етническо напрежение, а има всички условия за разбирателство. Дели ни само вярата, но днес и това е разрешим проблем, стига да работим за общата ни родина, а не за съседна държава.

@guerguistoyanov137

6 жыл бұрын

Умно и грамотно казано! Радвам се да видя човек като тебе тук! Браво!

@dzhoshkunmahmudov6690

6 жыл бұрын

MITKO MIDHAD PASHA NE BESHE PO- GLUPAV OT TEBE . TOI NAPRAVI VSI4KO VAZMOZNO DA NE GONIAT TURTSITE bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B8%D0%B4%D1%85%D0%B0%D1%82_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B0 PRO4ETI DOKRAIA ZA DA RAZBERESH TSELTA NA KAZANOTO OT NEGO

@saxostoyanov7298

6 жыл бұрын

dzhoshkun mahmudov Моите почитания към интереса ти свързан с българската история, но трябва да отбележа, че си от обратната страна.Тоест не си от моята страна.Съветвам те да четеш изворовия материал!Чети статията в оригинал на френски и ще ти светне лампичката ,че си в грешка.Това ,което предлагаш на аудиторията е Уикипедия.Това е несериозно!Особено като се има пред вид , че това твоето: "Чети до края" се отнася не до изворов материал ,тоест не до изказването на Мидхат паша , а до някакъв допълнителен коментар на неговто изказване.Та този коментар от днешна, доста изкривена гледна точка, се опитва след 140 години да ни светне какво е мислил по онова време пашата.Хайде моля без глупости!Ако искаш да те уважават хората не може да ползваш такива коментари нито като извор ,нито като каквото и да е доказателство на която и да е теза!Това е просто несериозно и няма нищо общо с историята!И ако искаш да си поизясниш картинката за себе си вземи ,че попрегледай материалите свързани с ДНК генеалогията на българите!Поинтересувай се защо в Турция спряха ДНК изследванията и защо засекретиха резултатите, даже и специален закон са приели по този въпрос доколкото се чува из научните среди.За да те облекча ще ти спомена,че у днешните български граждани има само 1,5% носители на турски гени.Ако приемем ,че тези гени са само сред тези ,които се мислят за турци в България, то излиза,че 15% от българските турци имат турски ген.Останалите 85% са без него!Много тъжно за Пантюркизма.И за да си по-спокоен ще ти кажа какво ми подхвърли един турски генетик.Човек,който е дълбокоуважаван като специалист и извън Турция.Според него: "Република Турция направи най-мащабното изследване в света и го засекрети защото, между Истамбул ,река Марица и българо-турската граница 90 % от гражданите носят български гени.В самия Стамбул с български гени са само 2%. По западното крайбрежие на Мала Азия носителите на български ген са почти 60%.В централен Анадол българския ген е около и под 1% ,което е в рамките на статистическата грешка.Изследването беше засекретено защото се оказа,че на изток в турски Кюрдистан в някой райони с български ген се оказват 40% от гражданите.По време на Османската империя е имало масови преселвания на българи от европейските вилаети в Кюрдистан."След тази информация аз бях стъписан.Професорът като ме погледа колко съм шокиран кротко добави,че в 60% от гените си той е българин, но е възпитан ,че е турчин и в тяхния род винаги се е говорело на турски и са се смятали за турци.Нямаше какво да му кажа.А на теб ще напомня ,че Мустафа Кемал паша е мюсулманин,чиито матерен език е български.Поинтересувай се как той определя България и какво мисли за враговете на България.Историческите и генетични реалности са едно а пропагандата и политиката са съвсем друго нещо.И не е пропаганда а научна истина ,че български турци в България почти няма, 75 000 души, но виж турци с български корен в Турция са милиони, без да го знаят.И моля пиши на Кирилица ,за да те уважаваме като събеседник!

@dzhoshkunmahmudov6690

6 жыл бұрын

TURSKA ANIMIRANA ISTORIA GODINA PO GODINA kzread.info/dash/bejne/c6xrppmTm8u4lso.html BALGARITE KADE FIGURIRAT

@dzhoshkunmahmudov6690

6 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/iZus0bOkmprQnrA.html

Please explain this mixed theory of yours? I can tell you that every human is mixed from day 1. Every nation that exists has been created by several different peoples joining together. Always has been like this. Another thing the make Y-Dna marker never changes, it is always passed down from father to son. So no matter who one has a child with the sons marker will always remain the same as the fathers. In this way we can tell who is what. Mixing means nothing, it does not erase the past as the past is deep in ones veins. All the Bulgar people are related as they have always been. Today just separated by borders. Greetings

@boxinghistory82

9 жыл бұрын

The so called Old Bulgarians have arrived in Europe ..they are not Europeans in their origins ...that is exactly what I mean when I say that in their origins they are different race and originally had nothing to do with Slavs ....actually many historical books are telling us that the Slavs tribes were enslaved by the Bulgarians. Thats why Vladimir Rasate hated them , thats why his father Boris - Mihail 1 blinded him as a punishment as Vladimir was killing Slavs and destroying churches when he was appointed by his father as a ruler of the Bulgarian Kingdom!

The History of Russia is, after all, quite normal! Even if it is sometimes fictional.

got any more of them pixels

Im from Krgyzstn We are Turkic people too. Sorry My English is So Bad. Bulgarain is By Turkic origin too??

@senseypires8817

5 жыл бұрын

no they are sılavic,first bulgars are turkic from onogur(ten oguz) but sılavic population was so much more then bulgarians,, turkic bulgars and rulled this sılavic people until the east roman empire annexed first bulgarian empire, after this fall bulgars used sılavic language, but they named selfs bulgar not with a slavic word, and today they are saying we are bulgars and they are not,

@mart4144

5 жыл бұрын

@@senseypires8817 The slavic invasion did not happen as it is nowadays presented. The forest that they are supposes to have come out of cannot even support 10 000 people properly, since its is filled with swamps and huge trees. Agriculture is impossible and hunting is very hard. Tell me now, since apparently this sea of Slavs is supposed to flood the Balkans, how do enough of them survive there? Plus take in to consideration that Herodotus once said that after the Indians, the Thracians are the second biggest population. As for the turkik descent, that is false since DNA tests show that 25% of the population has lived in these lands since 30,000 years.

@senseypires8817

5 жыл бұрын

@@mart4144 yes same thing, we turks good at rule and fight, but not good at Agriculture, sılav = slave bulgars used sılav peaceful(or not) for the Agriculture after east roman empire annex the bulgaria turks used sılavic languages but sılavs used turkis name for national idetiy because sılav = slave, russians have wiking name, serbs have SERF name, most probably sılav thought if we are use bulgarian name our rivals can be avoid from use, because this name have a war history, that is all, but there is some intereting thing, turks and fake bulgarians( i said fake because today still bulgarian people in russia and they have state this is makes sılavic bulgarians fake) have no good historical frend ship but sılavic bulgarians using a turkish name,, very very interesting... and there is another thing, i said turk not turkic, because bulgarians have same origin with anatolian turks, same language not like other turkic people,,, even when ottoman captured all bulgaria, we found real bulgarians they were lived and isolated their language from sılavic others, we found this bulgars and they can speak turkish and they can understant us, they were cover their religion to islam, bu after all wars and fake bulgarian facist leaders they emigrated to turkey today nearly 1 million real bulgar living in turkey, they are not like anatolian turks they were living at bulgaria before the ottmans.

@mart4144

5 жыл бұрын

@@senseypires8817 I see. Only things that bother me are that 1st, Bulgaria never had slaves, dont know where you got that from. 2 Bulgaria is the root of the cyrlic alphabet and all cyrlic languages(comes from St.Cyrill and Methode). And at last, Bulgarians have an origin of Thrace. Thrace was the old name of our nation. We still use the same names for cities and rivers. We have the same cultures(if you look at artifacts). We do not have an Anatolian descent as you say we do.

@senseypires8817

5 жыл бұрын

​@@mart4144 i said not fake bulgarians have descend from anatolia, i said REAL bulgarians descend from OGUZ turks, look at start of this discuss, there is a Kirghiz, and it is supposed the fake bulgarians turk, me and you knows that they are not,, and i said to him they are sılavic, not turk,that Kirghiz, supposed them turk because today still there is real bulgarians and they are turk and both side have same name, sılavs using and turks using, and this is making confusing, that is all, what is your problem ?

oи владиславчо немали да ми пишеш най после немало такова нещо като народ ? а какво има тогава? тук ставало въпрос за история ми дай да я видим тази история да видим што си ти па што съм аз?

This video is product ot Bulgarian nationalism. Since 1989, Bulgarian nationalism continues to live off cosy reminiscences of the ‘Revival Process’ ideology. Anti-Turkish rhetoric is now reflected in the theories that challenge the thesis of Turkic origin of the Proto-Bulgars. Alongside the ‘Iranian’ or ‘Aryan’ theory, there appeared arguments favouring an autochthonous origin... The ‘parahistoric’ theories, very often politically loaded and have almost nothing to do with objective scientific research in the field of Proto-Bulgarian Studies, could be summarized in several directions:...3)‘Aryan roots’ and the ‘enigmatic Eurasian homeland’. Meanwhile, another group of authors is looking eagerly for the supposed homeland of the ancient Bulgarians in the vast areas of Eurasia, perhaps by conscious or unconscious opposition to the pro-Western orientation of modern Bulgaria. At the same time, with little regard for consistency, they also oppose the Turkic theory, probably because this is in sharp contradiction with the anti-Turkish feelings shared by nationalistic circles. (Dobrev 2005; 2007.) in Claudia-Florentina Dobre, Cristian Emilian ed., Quest for a Suitable Past: Myths and Memory in Central and Eastern Europe, Central European University Press, 2018, ISBN 9633861365, pp. 142-143.

@OrthodoxBulgaria

3 жыл бұрын

Nope ! Fuck allah

@petertodorov1792

Жыл бұрын

Hanim NO Bulgarian supports the FAKE turkic theory

@user-yl8br3oh4s

6 ай бұрын

cry pan turk. we aren't turdic.

Ottoman empire was based on arabic languege and people they have been asimilated into greeks/armenians today turkish people think they are turkic because of "turk-ey" first 4 latters does not make you turkic :) imgur.com/a/1RrAK2k also "In population genetics, research has been conducted to study the genetic origins of the modern Turkish people (not to be confused with Turkic peoples) in Turkey" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Turkish_people

@Nomadicenjoyerplus

3 жыл бұрын

“Previous genetic studies have generally used Turks as representatives of ancient Anatolians. Our results show that Turks are genetically shifted towards Central Asians, a pattern consistent with a history of mixture with populations from this region. These diversity patterns observed in the PCA motivated formal testing of admixture in Armenians and other regional populations.” www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/02/18/015396.full.pdf “In addition, although some degree of genetic continuity could be expected in Anatolia (i.e. in modern Turks), it should be noted that modern Turks are a hybrid population, comprising of the original Anatolian stock, Turkic people (i.e. of Central Asian ancestry). This is surely reflected in the modern Turkish Y-DNA” doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179474 Moreover, results pointed out that language in Anatolia might not have been replaced by the elites, but by a large group of people. Therefore, it can be concluded that the observations do not support the elite dominance model of Renfrew (1987 ; 1991). etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12607764/index.pdf The weight for the migration event predicted to originate from the branch ancestral to East Asia into current-day Turkey was 0.217 (21.7%). Although this implies a major population event from the East to West Asia, we note that these weights are not direct estimates of the migration rates. First, the original contributing populations to the ancestral population in Turkey are not known. For instance, we do not know the exact genetic relationship between current-day East Asian populations and the Turkic speakers from Central Asia who migrated into Anatolia about 1,000 years before present. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236450/ (Note:%21.7 doesn’t mean %21.7 Turk because first Turks were %40-45 east eurasian not %100 so it means %50 Turk by blood) abload.de/img/untitled-1b3k6r.png media.discordapp.net/attachments/747058885797347388/747081098621616188/74270248_151753982884837_667409747107905536_n.png media.discordapp.net/attachments/746376025944096778/784377847082647582/unknown.png DNA from a 2,000-year-old burial site in Mongolia has revealed new information about the Xiongnu, a nomadic tribe that once reigned in Central Asia. Researchers in France studied DNA from more than 62 skeletons to reconstruct the history and social organization of a long-forgotten culture. Skeletons from the most recent graves also contained DNA sequences similar to those in people from present-day Turkey. This supports other studies indicating that Turkish tribes originated at least in part in Mongolia at the end of the Xiongnu period. www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/07_03/ancient.shtml The people of modern-day Iran and Turkey trace their genetic heritage to the ancient Persians and the Turkic ethnic people, respectively. www.myheritage.com.tr/ethnicities/broadly-west-asian/ethnicity-worldwide-distribution Historically, the racial classification of the Turkic peoples was sometimes given as "Turanid". Turanid racial type or "minor race", subtype of the Europid (Caucasian) race with Mongoloid admixtures, situated at the boundary of the distribution of the Mongoloid and Europid "great races".[53][54] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/G25_PCA_East_Mediterranean.png_-_Anatolia_and_the_surrounding.png Some malevolent people or people who do not know enough about the subject try to exaggerate the rate of Turks and Armenians in Anatolia. For example, it is possible to encounter people who claim that approximately 50% of Anatolian Turks are of Greek or Armenian origin. However, when the Ottoman Tahrir registers belonging to the years 1520-1530 are examined, it is concretely revealed that even 93% of the Anatolian people belonged to Turkmen tribes and communities. The non-Muslim population ratio of approximately 10% has remained at the same rates in the last periods of the Ottoman Empire. In some parts of Anatolia, with the effect of Islamization, a small number of indigenous people, who were Muslims, were dissolved in the Turks. Moreover relocation and exchange with the separated Greeks and Armenians from Turkey Turkey genetic structure is completely different from the Turks. Although there was a partial change in the demographic structure of eastern Anatolia with the settlement of Kurds in Eastern Anatolia in the 16th century, it was easier for Muslim Turks and Kurds to merge in that region. Since the 19th century, a significant portion of non-Muslim immigration that took place in Turkey Turks (Caucasus and Balkan Turks) reccommended. These also partially affected the existing population and genetic structure. As a result, his "ethnic Turks", "Turkmen" or "nomads" as a defining Turkey Turkey genetically Central Asians (Turkmenistan) seems to be quite close to the Turkmens. Turkey is quite obvious they resemble each other in the middle compared the genetic structure of Turkish and Turkmen. Turks and Turkmens belong to the Oghuzs in the historical process and show similarities with each other, both in terms of language, culture or ethnicity. you maintain genetic and historical research, Turkey shows that the Turkmen origin, in other words, the Turkish Anatolian Turks. www.haplogruplar.com/turkiye-turklerinin-orta-asyali-turkmenlerle-genetik-akrabaligi/

@Nomadicenjoyerplus

3 жыл бұрын

Arabic script not Arabic language

@cruelty5780

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nomadicenjoyerplus everything u linked proved the point that modern turkeys are hellenized by alexandar whole antolia which mean turkish people carry greek dna :)

@Nomadicenjoyerplus

3 жыл бұрын

@@cruelty5780 Native Anatolian dna is not hellenic dna

@cruelty5780

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nomadicenjoyerplus most of today greeks are not hellenic in first place but you are dna is south italian/greek at 60% of dna testers i do check soem forums since turkey is banned dna test i wonder why LOL so turks who live in other country did tests and shows higher procent of south italian/greek of turkets and around 30-40% balkans is even less 2% central asia :D

Hungarians, Bulgarians, ... :)))))))))))))))) Who do the Romanians come from? :)))))

@bogdanstanescu4509

4 жыл бұрын

@Öksökö :)))))))))))) Turkish alphabet is Latin, in the past it was Arabic! ...

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Lethean this video is completely joke🤣🤣

@mirceadacialorantbrescia4340

3 жыл бұрын

@@bogdanstanescu4509 are you joke? Before arabic we used our alphabet so called Göktürk. After that arabic then latin

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

@@mirceadacialorantbrescia4340 Gokturks took their alphabet from the Sogdians Then you took your civilization from the Arabs and the Persians Then you took your final alphabet from the West You were never able to create your own original civilization

There is no such thing as bulgars! It's bulgarians! Always has been!

@sskspartan

9 жыл бұрын

+Русе Русе Exactly.This destroys the Turk theory

@i6079

9 жыл бұрын

sskspartan Turk theory does not presents any prooves.

@makedon9991

8 жыл бұрын

+Цар Симеон I TATARS

@sskspartan

8 жыл бұрын

Makedon you look like a Turk ha ha ha ! But Tatars came like a thousand years after 681,bro...

@AlexSciChannel

7 жыл бұрын

Wait so are bulgars just a myth? or are they the same as Bulgarians? and if they are, are they original Bulgarians or migrated peoples from somewhere else? Please someone explain to me the Bulgar, Thracian, and Slavic Relationship in Bulgaria please?

"Един арабски автор възкликва.."....

IMO there was definitely an Eastern Iranian presence in what is now Bulgaria before the Slavic people arrived. You can still see it in the language and some of the customs, even when the Bulgarians started speaking a Slavic language they still used some Eastern Iranian words. The Western Iranian words from Persian came into the language MUCH LATER via Ottoman Turkish.

@Email5507

4 жыл бұрын

bulgars were turkic nothing to with iranians.

@gulsahsaglam5170

4 жыл бұрын

@Éran Zamin You shut up pls

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Gülşah Türk videoyu yapan türk düşmanı ekonomist 2 sene önce tahtalı köyü boyladı😅😅

@yaralikatil

3 жыл бұрын

@@gulsahsaglam5170 sende Turanid yüz mü var bana mı öyle geldi

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

@@Email5507 Fatlinda Islami You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her mommy in Gostivar

You guys been lied from the official history books.First all this tripes are coming from the same place where the 7 trips were living. The turm Slavic been invented in 15th century and replace the word Bulgarian.But both words mean gods people. You wander why that was done.I can gladly

You know theres a diffrence between the bulgarians and bulgars right??

Where is the next episode? I want to know much about mighty Bulgars.

@ivanovst1

5 жыл бұрын

There will hardly be a second episode! Professor Bozhidar Dimitrov passed away on July 1, 2018!

хаххахах yo albanian lady you cant live with urself hahahahah xDDDDDDDD

Is this somewhere else in English?

A kak shte obyasnite rezultatite ot DNA etnicheskiyat test napraven v dneshna Bulgaria koito pokazva Trako Slavyanska i Gratzka Haplogrupi ? Samo 1.5% Turkska Haplogrupa i 0% Iranska Haplogrupa? Tozi DNA test konspiratziya li e ?

@catch_me_if_you_can6596

6 жыл бұрын

spored nai-novoto izsledvane ot 2017 87% ot bulgarite sa s indokitaiski haplogrupi

The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. The Proto-Bulgarians had a somewhat eventful history prior to their arrival on the Balkan Peninsula. The earliest written sources indicate that they inhabited the region to the north of the Caucasus in the 4th century A.D. and had close contact with the Georgians and Armenians. They belonged to the Turkic ethno-linguistic group and their language resembled that of the Huns, Khazars, Avars and other tribes. (How the bulgarian state was founded-Dimiter Angelov) The Oghur, or Onogur or Ogur[3] languages (also known as Bulgar, Pre-Proto-Bulgar,[4]or Lir-Turkic and r-Turkic), are a branch of the Turkic language family. The only extant member of the group is the Chuvash language. The first to branch off from the Turkic family, the Oghur languages show significant divergence from other Turkic languages, which all share a later common ancestor. Languages from this family were spoken in some nomadic tribal confederations, such as those of the Onogurs or Ogurs, Bulgars, and Khazars.[5]Some scholars consider Hunnic a similar language[6] and refer to this extended grouping as Hunno-Proto-Bulgarian.[7] The only surviving language from this linguistic group is believed to be Chuvash.Harvard Professor Omeljan Pritsak in his study "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan" (1982)[10] concluded that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the Hunnic languages, as he calls the Oghur languages.[11] According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph Bolgars are still Turk in Volga region.Mahmud al kashgari wrote bulgar language in his diwan lughat al turk before 1000 years. Even ilovelanguages made video about bulgar language(volga bulgar poet from Diwan Lughat al Turk)

@georgi479

3 жыл бұрын

Stop exaggerating with your nonsense. Islam is a religion, it does not mean that every Muslim is a Turk. It is very well explained on the basis of 40 years of work what it is true.

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

@@jsuisheureux1425 stfu history thief

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

Hanim, You are the history thief. You Turks stole the entire Islamic civilization from the Arabs and the Persians and contributed nothing original

@user-yl8br3oh4s

6 ай бұрын

cry pan turk. we aren't turdic.

Yes, I try to PREACH where it´s possible. Despite I don´t approve WIKI and similar in many cases, you can always refer to WIKI regarding 681 AD. That year was found modern Bulgaria. During that time there exist no Turks nor Turkey - only Bulgaria and Byzantium. Simple. Further, Bulgaria/Vulgaria is written on a Byzantine map already in the 2th c. AD. No Turks or Türks exist. In China, Bulgarians were known as Huns, much older than any invented Türks, who are actually descendents from a mixture between older Koreans and older Bulgars (Huns). It´s quite clear and shouldn´t be confusing. Those who try to confuse are probably TROLLS, or really stupid ppl.

@Beatusable

4 жыл бұрын

@AC LOL, Bulgarians are NATIVE Europeans and Oldest on the Balkans - even in Europe. Bulgarians arriving from the East is “Fake news” and is not based on any historic facts nor documents. There is not a single Latin/Greek/Byzantine source which states that Bulgarians are Newcommers or “Türkic”. On the contrary, all ancient sources write that Bulgarians are the Oldest. They are ancient Thracians-Pelasgians: Paeonians, Macedonians, Mizians/Moesians, Tribali, Dacians, Geths, etc… ALL ARE ANCIENT BULGARIANS with different names. Well Germans, for example, have 4 different name - it means not that they are 4 different ppl.

@Beatusable

4 жыл бұрын

@AC Further, regarding the Bulgarian looks, you can just see pictures from early Middle Ages (when there existed not other European countries but Bulgaria), that Bulgarians look European/Caucasian. There exist no ethnic “Slavic” ppl and never existed. Allk is a LIE. When Bulgarians-Paeonians lived in Central Europe in the 5th c AD, there existed no “Hungary”. And Àtilla was Bulgarian, not Turkish or Avar. I hope you have learn something, dude.

@thisguy5591

4 жыл бұрын

U see right here ur wrong and ur dumb af

You are saying Turks are/ were mongoloid , bulgars are different, you are giving reference itugur, kitugur, onogur as bulgars ..Do you really know what these words are..meaning..e.g onogur..meaning 10 uyghur , dokuzogur ..nine Uygur..these are giving the sum of uyghur tribes (turkic)who came together ..Bulgar..bolgar..Balkar..same folks..Their cousins avar..pechenek..uz( oguz) .Kuman... khipcak ,slezensky magyar hun are all Ural/ altai... turkic ..you are speaking bulgarian of today which is mostly slavic, in 6th century if it would be the same then you should say kaizer..char ..khenet..not Khan Kubat. which is turkic way to define king ..

@zekihamzaoglu9608

3 жыл бұрын

@mamaprudnavchaq 2 stupid u r why ? U dont understand what i wrote. Be sure i know Balkan and turkic history , dont be Jirinowsky.

@pompacitokmakci

3 жыл бұрын

@@zekihamzaoglu9608 Bulgars were Turanid Turks

@pompacitokmakci

3 жыл бұрын

@@zekihamzaoglu9608 this video is joke bro

@petertodorov1792

3 жыл бұрын

@@pompacitokmakci Fatlinda Islami You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her mommy in Gostivar You are too embarrassed to be an Albanian so you pretend to be a Turk

@nova-dv3bv

2 жыл бұрын

@@pompacitokmakci Fatlinda Islami You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her mommy in Gostivar

Kubrat=Attila Csak másik időszámítás szerint. (krisztus születése, Nagy Sándor halála, Julianus naptár, Kusán naptár. Tévedésbők, ugyan az a történet többször is szerepel.

@Anmobgoccult20

4 жыл бұрын

Bravo!

As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars ( A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. www.britannica.com/topic/Turkic-languages According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph : www.academia.edu/683028/Classification_of_the_Hunno-Bulgarian_Loan-Words_in_Slavonic Both names are best explained as corresponding to Onogundur, an old name in Greek sources for the Bulgars. www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/khazars www.yourdictionary.com/bulgar whc.unesco.org/en/list/981/ www.academia.edu/1902427/The_Islamization_of_the_Volga_Bulghars_A_Question_Reconsidered More Sources: 1drv.ms/w/s!ArU3juYblIHghhn2C4hh-bLC8FRi

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

@T R kopyalayıp not defterine kaydedersen bana destek vermiş olursun :)

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

@T R discordun var mı

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

@T R milliyetçi bulgarlar hariç hiç kimse inanmıyor çöp bir iddia aynı sümerlerin türklüğü gibi :)

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

@T R sana dünyanın bütün üniversite kaynaklarını,tarihi belgeleri,ansiklopedi,genetik vs. atabilirim😂😂ön bulgarlar oğuzlar gibi bir türk kabilesidir antropolojik yapıları da turaniddir dilleri huncayla aynıdır

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

@T R word indir telefona ve bilgisayarına sonra bilgisayrdan kopyalıp word e at sonra telefondan da wordden kullanabilirsin

I have a question is alexander the great bulgarian

@talridisblagoev242

5 жыл бұрын

no:D frobaly Greek (or macedonian:D)

From the genetic tests I've seen Bulgarians are 39% Slavic not 20%, correct me if I error. Serbians 57% Slavic and Croatians 66%.

@dominiqueblagojevic9447

5 жыл бұрын

False. Serbs are 20 to 30 R1a . The highest is Poland and Ukrainian belarussian

Volga and Kazan Bulgars are speaking Turkish. All ancient Bulgars too. They are not İranian or Armenian.

@Bayganu

5 жыл бұрын

There are no Volga (Kazan) bulgars. They've been exterminated by tatars (turkic people)

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Volga Bulgars spoke Turkic long before mongol empire🤣🤣even Mahmud al Kashgari and Ahmad ibn Fadlan wrote

@papazataklaattiranimam

3 жыл бұрын

Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009

@OrthodoxBulgaria

3 жыл бұрын

fuck allah

@alexandernaydenov7539

3 жыл бұрын

@@papazataklaattiranimam please take some braincells KOPIUM

i wanna hear about pra-chines or pra-italians or pra-mongolians hahahahhahahaha love anatolian greeks tell me what i am

A lot of biased misleading info, trying to mystify, justify plenty of wrong deeds. Is good you subtitled it, so those who know historical facts can comment. First of all, what serious civilization that keeps bouncing places all around Asia, builds stone cities then leave? LOL One can only imagine that those stone cities were built by others and history comes to confirm that were sacked by nomad Bulgars, for loot, then after a while, moved to the next rich target. Like all nomads did. To live by loot, a group must be specialized, skillful in what we'd call today.. CRIME. and Khan Asparuh treasures come to confirm that are clearly not the result of Bulgarian craftsmanship but of plunder and loot. How can you claim such absurd thing, like 10,000 Macedonian soldiers married 10,000 Bulgar women and after many centuries they came all the way to find their assumed partially forefathers, to take their land? Gosh, based on your theory any African can claim Europe or America. Definitely one of the craziest hereditary theories I've heard. Is clearly attested, by all sources, that Bulgars settled in a few villages around Pliska, were not more than 10,000-20,000 with families and all, and surprise! they didn't build any stone city in about 150 years there.. They lived instead on plunder and imposing tribute on sedentary populations of Antes and Vlachs. And here is were your army of 100,000 came from; the subdued Balkaners from north and south of Danube, that also used to revolt against Byzantine rule by that time. 10,000-20,000 Burgars - men and women, and the majority of indigenous people. What sort of nation, that you believe was of 1-2 Million souls by that time, fights men and women together and along all subdued attested to have participated are maximum 100,000 all? If they were 1-2 Million and all men and women fought they should be a Million strong army, that could easily wipe out the Byzantine Empire and all Empires till recent days. lol What sort of military superior Bulgarian army needed 100,000 to defeat 60,000 Byzantines? We know that Byzantine army was also engaged in Middle East and it's Balkan source of recruits were also revolting against them, that time. And, at last, you said there was no Byzantine Empire, only Roman Empire, then you talk only about the Byzantine Empire, not the Roman Empire. And by all evidence, Bulgars and the FYROM Bulgars, are not on the losing side, after the Treaty of Berlin, since they occupied and shared with the Greeks the ancestral land of Vlachs. That can be proven by all means. What a mess, you wanna call the history of Bulgars. Today's Bulgars should be prouder of any other heritage, except the Bulgarian one, but unfortunately, non worth claiming is genetically substantiated by language and name.

@catch_me_if_you_can6596

6 жыл бұрын

i know bulgarian history more than u and i can confirm most of the video was right,while your pity attempt to invent a new bulgarian history is pity because u have no clue in history

@cameliadimova990

5 жыл бұрын

Al Green We are proud even of the Bulgarian one ...even though small pourcentage, being nomadic doesn't necessarily mean something negative or bad..I'm Bulgarian and recently did DNA test , I expected Asian admixture and didn't get any, I'm disappointed fyi...What are you proud of ? Tell us pls and pls take it easy ! :) All the best!

If the title is in English, the audio should be in English too!

@zarinator7692

5 жыл бұрын

bruh

@esterzach

4 жыл бұрын

No, but seriously, why all those people around the world speak other languages at all! Should be only English after all.

Колко много хора от други държави коментират.Няма лоша реклама.И какво мислите за Куманите.Асеновата и Шишмановата династия са от Кумански произход - факт. Даже и в днешна Македония има град Куманово.Много се подценява този фактор - лично мнение.

@0xe849

4 жыл бұрын

Съжалявам ги даже. По-скоро се питам, какво се опитват да докжат с това? Няма да могат да пренапишат историята така или иначе, ние винаги ще сме нацията, която сме и която е била. А те нека да си говорят, дали сме тюрки, турци, авари, хуни, славяни и т.н. Ние сме Българи! И поне знаем за своята история много повече от тях :) По-скоро за това ги е яд и се опитват да всяват смут.

When I walk around the streets, I can see completely different faces and features. I can see it among the whites in Bulgaria, Serbia, Greece, England, Spain, Germany, France and wherever I have ever been. People have different genes among their so called 'own ethnic groups'. People that identify as 'Bulgarians' not necessarily have the same genetic origin. The same goes for other ethnic groups. It is impossible for people to have 'pure' genes of a certain 'ethnic' group. 'Bulgarian' is an identity. 'Greek' is an identity - sense of belonging to something, a human need being it to be to nation, organisation, sport or team if you want. I do not like how this former communist is telling me what am I and explaining the world where do my 'ancestors' come from. 'Bulgaria' is just a name kept from 'Bulgars' - genes, language etc is absorbed from diverse other pools. No Bulgarian has exactly the same genes with other Bulgarians. The same goes for Greeks, Serbians, French, Scottish etc.. I know that what I have been told is a lie. I know that i am something much more and I am mixture of diverse genes. Go and make yourself ancestry DNA test and see that you are not as pure as you think you are - wherever you come from - you, the reader of my comment. It ends up we are diverse yet all human. I believe on science and the future - not the stories from the past that do not have legitimate scientific outlook. Blood gives more data as to what you are made up of than you, being just told what are. Furthermore - history is a curse - it promotes hatered among the human capital and does not serve as tool to teach us lessons. History should be called 'archeology' and should outline that it covers at points evident, and moreover -theoretical outlook. It should not be mandatory in any system. The educational systems could brainwash the kids in a different way to give them higher developmental perspective, especially now in a technological world where we need new developmental perspectives.

@Summer4y

3 жыл бұрын

Martin, I felt like I was reading my own thoughts!

@user-df6ps1sh8x

3 жыл бұрын

That is very reasonable. But DNA markers are still too non specific to discriminate different ethnic groups.

On 29 July 1014 Basil II and his general, Nikephoros Xifias, broke the Bulgarian army into the Battle of Kleidion in the Belles Mountains.After that Basil II is called "the Bulgarian-slayer".why? why captured 15,000 prisoners and blinded 99 of every 100 men Basil II, eventually subduing the Bulgarians in 1018

@beadsman13

3 жыл бұрын

You can imagine what honor is to win vs Bulgarians. For Bulgarian tzar's to beat Byzantines is just another day in office. All they do is to make cup from emperors skull. ;)

@collector22

2 жыл бұрын

What was the point of this historical fact? I don't see any connection with the origin of the proto Bulgars here. "At dawn on July 26 811, the Bulgarians managed to trap the retreating Nikephoros in the Vărbica pass. The Byzantine army was wiped out in the ensuing battle and Nikephoros was killed, while his son Staurakios was carried to safety by the imperial bodyguard after receiving a paralyzing wound to the neck. It is said that Krum had the Emperor's skull lined with silver and used it as a drinking cup." See, my quote was as relevant to the story as much as yours was.

...и разбира се един добър край!

I thought maybe I would learn some history of the Bulgarian nation, because what I know is covered in mystery but seemed interesting, but like every video on Balkan history, the topic is a morass of competing and propagandist claims that a casual viewer cannot separate which is true and which is false. Greeks, Turks, Slavs Albanians and sometimes Romanians congregate and you hear everything from actual history to the utter fantasies of modern nation builders. It makes a man tired. No matter how open minded and friendly and pan-balkan love you have, some of the comments here will trigger you.

@dalia_mar

4 жыл бұрын

Agree,The only way to separate the truth out of politics is relying on archeological artefacts.Unfortionately artefacts could stay hidden by purpose as is in our case while travelling across today's different countries and leaving our kings graves in foreign lands.I am grateful to Ukraine about announced Kubrats treasure,but kings Samuil remains and stone stella stay in Greece and they're not exposed for the public.Many artefacts are in Russia,especially the early christianity books in Glagolic and Cyrilic we gave to Rus in 9th century to step on /Rus formally accepted christianity in 10th century.

@gia4579

4 жыл бұрын

I am Greek and I respect my neighboors Bulgarians. Just an advice....dont deal with the balkans. They have only; a bad ironic comment to make to you and most times it is a shit. Just to make you feel bad. Everyone in the balkans wants to tell to thei neighboors what they are and he is not looking for his origins. My advice is only for you to take cool such comments. The real educated people know history and know how to respect history past present future of every nation. Love from a neighboor in Greece!

@gia4579

4 жыл бұрын

Most balkans say to their neighboors what they are...so funny. If I know I am Greek and I feel Greek and I respect the Greek culture noone can change me that. What is the reason to try make the neighboor feel bad??? Most comments here come from nationalist uneducated people who are saying bullshits and they want just arguements. So do not pay attention to every shit here. If you feel Bulgarian and you respect your culture noone can tell you who you are or who you are not. We are what we feel and what we grew up with and noone can change that from us. DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO NATIONALISTS WHO SAY SHITS WITHOUT HISTORICAL PROOFS. MAKE DISCUSSION ONLY WITH EDUCATED PEOPLE WHO HAVE READ HISTORY AND USE PROOFS AND LOGIC IN THEIR WAY OF THINKING. Good luck friend.

@nextlevelbrosagency

4 жыл бұрын

@@gia4579 You speak the truth Giannis.

@gia4579

4 жыл бұрын

@@nextlevelbrosagency Thank you! We Greeks accept bad comments from the albanians all the time who blame us for everything and they try to change our history. I really cant find a clue to enter a page and leave toxin poisonous comments for neighboors and their culture. If you dont like a neighboor just leave him. When we dont like or we dont respect someone we just ignore him..no need to enter a page leaving bad comments. If someone deals with you and try to make you feel bad, he is certainly jealous of you...Keep that in mind. And never pay attention to nationalists because they are toxic brainwashed and uneducated. They will fall you down to their unexisted level and they will make you sick. Good luck!

The bulgarians are not natives of their land. They came from i don t care where and colonise the thracians that lived there. He thracians were all over europe. The thracians are dacian. Today there are millions of romanians in ollover europe living in their original land. In bulgaria and many european countryes they were asimmilated by force. You are not from here since you came from somewhere 1300 years ago!

@user-kg2qe4ir2g

6 жыл бұрын

Neacsu Florian Not yust dacians were thracians.There were odrisians,measians,besians,serdians,who had a big kingdom from 6 century B.C. till 45year A.C.,when thay fall under the Roma empire. Later in 7century the same people with the comming from the north of the Black sea skites--bulgarians established the Bulgarian kingdom, who was north and south of the Danube,later from the Black sea to the Adriatic sea and from the Karpatian mountens to Aeghean sea--in the 9 century.

@user-uk1bi4fp4z

4 жыл бұрын

Romanians are NOT Thracians!

The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features.

@petertodorov9540

3 жыл бұрын

Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

@petertodorov9540

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/mX6lqqZpZb25lrw.html&ab_channel=WION

@zalmorxis4736

2 жыл бұрын

BogAria! Bog - God, Aria - Thrace! 😉

@Gotse.Delchev.Reborn

6 ай бұрын

Nice propaganda, in reality: National Library of Medicine (US Government) - "...the Y-chromosome gene pool in modern Bulgarians is primarily represented by Western Eurasian haplogroups with ∼ 40% belonging to haplogroups E-V13 and I-M423, and 20% to R-M17. Haplogroups common in the Middle East (J and G) and in South Western Asia (R-L23*) occur at frequencies of 19% and 5%, respectively. Haplogroups C, N and Q, distinctive for Altaic and Central Asian Turkic-speaking populations, occur at the negligible frequency of only 1.5%...".

Кроватова България и покръстването на българите · Ганчо Ценов