Fabulous! Frightening! Exciting! Amazing memorization skills! Thank you so much.
@user-nk5jb8dj1s3 жыл бұрын
Incroyable. Quel virtuose ! Bravissimo !
@lphnmed4823 жыл бұрын
niesamowita sprawność techniczna!
@drhennielambrechts92137 жыл бұрын
Wow
@Basal897 жыл бұрын
GREAT!
@organbuilder2723 жыл бұрын
Thumbs up for your technical performance. This piece is nothing more than a noisy showpiece. There is a mistake, by the way. wrong note. All that run between pedal and manual could as easily be done on the manuals alone. Disonance, no real flow, jerky. this is just notes strung together. You played well but there are pieces far better to show your skill. Don't compare yourself to Carpenter either. He is a showman but not a musician. He playes perfectly but without feeling. This piece has no feeling either.
@raymondberry5965
3 жыл бұрын
Carpenter wants to be the 21st century Virgil Fox. What is needed is a 21st century E. Power Biggs.
@organbuilder272
3 жыл бұрын
@@raymondberry5965 Hello Raymond. In a way I would like to agree with you. Carpenter is a technically proficient organist. But his constant whining about how organs sound different in different places and by different builders is ludacrist (sp). He plays the notes perfectly with as much bombast as possible. Yet he is a performer but relying on his physique and rather unorthadox appearance of the hair style. But that's okay. He is an individual. Biggs was much too straight laced - remember he and G. Donald Harrison had a falling out over extremes of organ design (Tonally) Biggs demanding that Aeolian-Skinner begin producing nothing but tracker organs in the north German style, while Harrison wanted a more moderate, versital tonal structure like Silberman. One must admit, Fox was a populist organist. He brought classic music to the masses AND so did Biggs but with much less showmanship. They both were dedicated to education - they approached it from different positions. Carpenter, with all his whining and bad mouthing pipe organs has become the strongest advocate for digital organs that you could ask for. This is a subject for much debate but definitely Carpenter could have been another Fox but he has no "Class" to his act. which both Fox and Biggs did. Neither of them criticised the organs they played and neither of them publicly, at least, never spoke ill of the other. Carpenter - technically perfect, musically a dud. Try Sebastian Heindle - There is the new whiz kid of the organ world. See his rendition of Messorgsky's NIGHT ON BARE MOUNTAIN and several BACH pieces. 21 now.
@christurpin1816
2 жыл бұрын
I know Carpenter pretty well...he’s a technical monster, but he’s also a product of a new age of listener...people just want to be entertained. Biggs was definitely too stiff, Carpenter too much of a cartoon...what the world needs is another Liszt or Reger.
@douglasjensen8986
21 күн бұрын
@@organbuilder272 I'm happy that you mentioned Heindle, he is terrific and I am a big fan of him.
Пікірлер: 10
Fabulous! Frightening! Exciting! Amazing memorization skills! Thank you so much.
Incroyable. Quel virtuose ! Bravissimo !
niesamowita sprawność techniczna!
Wow
GREAT!
Thumbs up for your technical performance. This piece is nothing more than a noisy showpiece. There is a mistake, by the way. wrong note. All that run between pedal and manual could as easily be done on the manuals alone. Disonance, no real flow, jerky. this is just notes strung together. You played well but there are pieces far better to show your skill. Don't compare yourself to Carpenter either. He is a showman but not a musician. He playes perfectly but without feeling. This piece has no feeling either.
@raymondberry5965
3 жыл бұрын
Carpenter wants to be the 21st century Virgil Fox. What is needed is a 21st century E. Power Biggs.
@organbuilder272
3 жыл бұрын
@@raymondberry5965 Hello Raymond. In a way I would like to agree with you. Carpenter is a technically proficient organist. But his constant whining about how organs sound different in different places and by different builders is ludacrist (sp). He plays the notes perfectly with as much bombast as possible. Yet he is a performer but relying on his physique and rather unorthadox appearance of the hair style. But that's okay. He is an individual. Biggs was much too straight laced - remember he and G. Donald Harrison had a falling out over extremes of organ design (Tonally) Biggs demanding that Aeolian-Skinner begin producing nothing but tracker organs in the north German style, while Harrison wanted a more moderate, versital tonal structure like Silberman. One must admit, Fox was a populist organist. He brought classic music to the masses AND so did Biggs but with much less showmanship. They both were dedicated to education - they approached it from different positions. Carpenter, with all his whining and bad mouthing pipe organs has become the strongest advocate for digital organs that you could ask for. This is a subject for much debate but definitely Carpenter could have been another Fox but he has no "Class" to his act. which both Fox and Biggs did. Neither of them criticised the organs they played and neither of them publicly, at least, never spoke ill of the other. Carpenter - technically perfect, musically a dud. Try Sebastian Heindle - There is the new whiz kid of the organ world. See his rendition of Messorgsky's NIGHT ON BARE MOUNTAIN and several BACH pieces. 21 now.
@christurpin1816
2 жыл бұрын
I know Carpenter pretty well...he’s a technical monster, but he’s also a product of a new age of listener...people just want to be entertained. Biggs was definitely too stiff, Carpenter too much of a cartoon...what the world needs is another Liszt or Reger.
@douglasjensen8986
21 күн бұрын
@@organbuilder272 I'm happy that you mentioned Heindle, he is terrific and I am a big fan of him.