this channel was the reason why i switched from console to PC !!

@BlitzvogelMobius

7 жыл бұрын

"They almost only make console videos....." You must not subscribe to them, because you would know that is false. They are always examining PC game and hardware performance, both against other pieces of PC hardware and consoles when it comes to multiplatform titles.

@MrNarsisus

7 жыл бұрын

Riseer noice that's a great config bro \m/.

@randomuser4785

7 жыл бұрын

I wonder which channel you will be watching once ff15/ Horizon / Last Guardian / Red Dead Redemption are launched...PC is irrelevant garbage. ps. enjoy your pc outdated graphics and indie shovel ware ps2.don't forget to moan in comment section for pc port

@lampenpam

7 жыл бұрын

+Random User nice bait bro

@Bluesparks_

7 жыл бұрын

Random User Straight console fuckery

seems Rich has already forgotten about RX 470. Nvidia certainly knows how $$ can influence memory of a reviewer.

@Mr_Doodleydoo

7 жыл бұрын

I guess he's only got 3.5GB of memory...

@mrburtbox9446

7 жыл бұрын

Woah that's a serious allegation you are proposing their friend. Perhaps instead he just forgot about it or didn't think that it was particularly relevant?

@AngYangShen

7 жыл бұрын

mxxx wxxx He mentioned the rx470 in the video saying how it provides much more performance. I think you only have 2gb worth of attention span that's why

Would it kill you people to at least watch the video and pay attention? The RX 470 is included at around 05:00. At that point in the video he also clearly states that the 1050 Ti, just like the RX 460, is a bit too pricey for the performance it offers because the next step up (i.e. GTX 1060 or RX470) is basically just a few bucks away and considerably faster. Seriously, at least watch the entire video and pay attention. The video is only around 6 minutes long... it's not that hard. Stop complaining that the RX 470 wasn't included or forgotten because "CONSPIRACY!". It's in there.

@rasaska8701

7 жыл бұрын

Clairvoyant81 true, but it seemed kinda bias that he said, it's looking bad for the Red team, especially since the 460 is 30-40$ cheaper

@Stephan5916

7 жыл бұрын

True. Most people on KZread have a short attention span imo.

@ezodagrom

7 жыл бұрын

The RX460 2GB version is cheaper, but they compared the 1050 Ti with the RX460 4GB version, which is priced around the same price tier (with a few models a bit cheaper).

@MikaHR100

7 жыл бұрын

ezodagrom theres less difference in price between 1050ti and 470 than 460 and 1050ti lol

@ezodagrom

7 жыл бұрын

MikaHR100 I only had checked US newegg, where the cheapest RX460 4GB is $126.99, cheapest GTX1050 Ti is $139.99 and cheapest RX470 is $179.99, but, I guess different shops, different results.

bought a 1050ti 4 gig card today, running everything like an absolute champ. I bought the last GPU at the store lol

I've seen an RX 470 4GB "Red Devil" recently for £165, and some of the 1050 Tis are going for similar money. IMO it makes little sense to buy this over the RX 470 unless power and heat are a major concern. Better yet, the GTX 1060 6GB or RX 480 8GB offer better value for money and should last much longer.

@tougs

7 жыл бұрын

3GB of VRAM won't soon be enough for 1060...

@DunkelLink

7 жыл бұрын

Right.

@Cogglesz

7 жыл бұрын

I feel like people advising others not to waste their money is a good thing indeed, Just over on the AMD side, i've seen my 3gb 280x card hit memory limitations in a few games. Not many but it can happen, Like Touko i do feel 3GB isn't going to be enough soon & of course there is other bottlenecks for me to consider but yeah, if only it was a 4gb card, I'd jump on a 4gb version of the 1060 straight away.

@1921sebi

7 жыл бұрын

There are definitely games that use >3GB in 1080p at higher settings. ME Catalyst for example.

@chriss5828

7 жыл бұрын

Sina Madani I'll probably get the rx 480 which should age wonderfully when dx12 and vulkan become standardised.

RX 470>1050/Ti Deal with it

@doom9gaming

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah because AMD cards run quiet, cool and have longer life. /s

@asderr77

7 жыл бұрын

Doom9 - Gaming Videos Yes, they do, they definitely have a longer lifespan.

@axel0123

7 жыл бұрын

+Doom9 - Gaming Videos Are you for realz or just being sarcastic?

@doom9gaming

7 жыл бұрын

Jeff Fassbender /s is a sign for sarcasm.

@axel0123

7 жыл бұрын

Doom9 - Gaming Videos Good to hear bro. Just wanna to confirm it haha. :D

how is this better than rx 470?

@manuj371

7 жыл бұрын

Its not :D

@lakibadhikari7930

7 жыл бұрын

+Manuj Mittal they're comparing it to an rx460 which is not even in the same price bracket

@mungojerrie86

7 жыл бұрын

lakib adhikari it is not

@rushdrift

7 жыл бұрын

not even close, rx470 provide similar perf to rx480

@manuj371

7 жыл бұрын

lakib adhikari yes and you can find RX 470 in $170 which is much more improvement in just $30. both are great though in their segment.

With current pricing the RX 470 4GB remains king.

@antonkirilenko3116

7 жыл бұрын

The lack of ShadowPlay(or something simillar) is one of the reasons why I don't like AMD GPUs.

@bimbobaggins7658

7 жыл бұрын

budget gamers not gonna do recording for most of the time

@inayamei

7 жыл бұрын

So only less than 1% of gamers make YT videos.

@Zecuto

7 жыл бұрын

AFAIK, OBS already added AMD hardware recording to the main build. It should be inferior to the shadowplay in terms of ease of use but none the less. It is also FREE. "4k up to 60 FPS" on 1050ti? Good luck.

@vitalsignscritical

7 жыл бұрын

I think the RX 480 is a better bet whether the 4GB or 8GB.

this is the worst budget "king" out there. in many other countries the 470 and 1050ti cost the same

@z4v3k

7 жыл бұрын

Like where ? in europe the cheapest gtx 1050 ti is 155€ (price will drop) and the rx 470 200€ same as the gtx 1060 3gb.

@MegaAgente17

7 жыл бұрын

As we only have to care about our country, and not about other countries, i don't give a shit.

@KrullMaestaren

7 жыл бұрын

Europe got many countries, best offer in Sweden is ~175€ for either 1050Ti or RX470. You can easily get a 1060 3GB or a RX480 4GB for ~200€

@jeffreyhramika8603

7 жыл бұрын

You can get versions of either for $169 @ New Egg

@_TrueDesire_

7 жыл бұрын

Jeffrey Hramika that makes no sense, why would anyone pick the 1050ti for that price? :P

rx 470 way better

@rohanofgondor

7 жыл бұрын

Benas M LOL

@ALph4cro

7 жыл бұрын

Well, it is. Why LOL?

@MrShpiky

7 жыл бұрын

exactly.

@tarcal87

7 жыл бұрын

+ALph4 Because he can't refute it but his ego/fanboyism urges him to speak out, even if it's utter nonsense.

@josephgarfield3363

7 жыл бұрын

Benas M the RX 470 is better. but the pricing is weird at the moment. for the money the 1050ti is great

rx 460 dragon edition is $99. Better price to performance. For the price of the 1050, an rx 470 is over 50% faster for around $20-$30 more. Amd is the price to performance king.

Holy shit, the Ti was compared to the 460...? I had huge respect for this channel for its expertise, but this is either deliberate (favoring NVidia) or just a huge oversight, either way, not professional. The 1050 is in the price range of the 460 and it beats it, indeed. The 1050 Ti is in the price range of the 470 where the 470 beats it by 30% or so for an extra ~$10 or so. No doubt. The 1050 Ti shouldn't be bought in theory, yet it will sell like hotcakes due to 1) videos like this 2) people already assuming NVidia is the best, despite facts speaking for themselves. So good job DF... (sarcastically).

Fucking love Digital Foundry!

Finally someone brought up the fact that the 470 costs barely anything more and way out performs the 1050 Thankyou Richard!

Like serious have you been paid not to include 470's the best value card in the sub 200 bracket?

@ilhammohd3077

7 жыл бұрын

David Lee nvidiot foundry

@Krreko

7 жыл бұрын

David Lee But they did mention it and compared it agaisnt the 1050ti on far cry primal. Soooo

@sanmattew7221

7 жыл бұрын

are you fucked up in the head? the rx 470 is much more expensive than the 1050 ti. Hell in my country it is in fact $60 more expensive than the 1050 ti.

@Krreko

7 жыл бұрын

San Mattew Yeah in the US it's like 40-60 USD more, so yeah

@ussocomfreak

7 жыл бұрын

Kevin Rivera If you're comparing MSI models, they're just about the same price. MSI GAMING GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB GDDR5 DirectX 12 Graphics Card (GeForce GTX 1050 TI GAMING X 4G) www.amazon.com/dp/B01MA62JSZ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_CZKeyb5FPZZ1J MSI GAMING RX 470 GDDR5 4GB CrossFire VR Ready FinFET DirectX 12 Graphics Card (Radeon RX 470 GAMING X 4G) www.amazon.com/dp/B01JS9F9K4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_r0KeybF51E86Q

in Australia the gtx 1050 ti is $100 more than the cheapest rx 460, and only $30 less than the cheapest rx 470.. I think I'd the rx 470

Always glad to see Wichard in a video, but what about the RX 470?

@MrDitkovich

7 жыл бұрын

Faster than these 1050 cards

@Chief_1177

4 жыл бұрын

The 470 is supposed to compete with the 1060

1050 ti is way overpriced the rx 470 is only like 15$ more and close to 40% faster

@jasondenis24

7 жыл бұрын

toot1231 cheapest rx470 I could find is $170. You can find a few 1050ti's for 140. That's a 30 dollar difference, not 10. In America atleast.

@solocamo3654

7 жыл бұрын

Even with a $30 delta, the 470 is considerably faster. Most games are 20+fps in favor of the 470... I'd certainly pay $30 bucks for that kind of lead.

@jasondenis24

7 жыл бұрын

SoloCamo yeah, Ik same

@DaMedicDemonow

7 жыл бұрын

+JumpyM8ty on Newegg MSI 1050 ti costs just as much as XFX 470 tho, the Zotac 1050 ti is $30 cheaper, but to be honest Zotac isn't the best buy for any kind of GPU

@SougoUltimateSadist

7 жыл бұрын

Sadly its only in USA, everywher else sellers have to add VAT + some for income ending up costing 30% or more than in USA Cheapest RX 470 costs 212 Euros 1050 TI ~180euros, there are some for 141euro but since its greyed out (not in stock yet) i dont count these Difference may seem same, but that additional costs is just too much already

Actually, the performance of the 460 is very good for its price. Last time at this price tag were only complete shitty cards and the 460 changed that. Also, the 1050ti is in the price range of the 470 and not from the 460...

You can get a 1050ti from $139 to $169 or a RX470 from $169 (4Gig) to $219 (8 Gig). With much better performance. The only reason people say its the new budget cards is they get free stuff from Nvidia.

The 1050 makes sense in its price bracket. The bottom end of the 1050ti range makes sense but with the price of cards like the MSI one shown here being only £10 cheaper than an aftermarket cooled 470, the upper end of the 1050ti range makes no sense at all.. Faster than its AMD equivalent? Maybe faster than the card they want you to compare it to, the 460, but it is nowhere near the AMD product available for similar money, the 470.

I was about to get the 750 TI when this was announced. Glad I waited.

The 1050Ti cost around 155 atm. that's not far away from the RX 470, which is double as fast. It's right in the middle of the 470 and 460.

@flyingsnail6079

7 жыл бұрын

pSyk Double? More like 50%.

@GregoryCunningham

7 жыл бұрын

Yah, he's crazy. Maybe the only game he cares about is Hitman?

@Simon74

7 жыл бұрын

Flying Snail Overdid it a bit yeah... :/

I really like the fact that in the background you have 2 original 360s and a radeon 6870. Miss those a lot :D

If you can somehow squeeze 60 more dollars to get the 4gb 480, its crazy how much faster performance you'll get. For 200$, thats really my hugest reccomendation of a card. Either a 1060 or a 480 would be THE 1080p cards right now. And maybe some 1440p games.

I read the title as The New Burger King.. 🤫

The 460 have to be compared with the 1050, and the 470 with the 1050ti. Why am I not surprised that you say the new nvidia card is the best cheap graphic card? Don't tra to say that basing on the price the 460 have to be compared with the 100 ti, cause it's a lie. In all europe the right comparisons are the seguent: 460-1050, 470-1050ti, 480 4gb-1060 3gb, 480 8gb1060 6gb. The 480/4 goes from 210 to 240, the 1060/3 from 250 to 280, the 480/8 from 270 to 320, and the 1060/6 from 340 to 390/400€.

2:25 Oh the stutters on the amd side.

@semitope

7 жыл бұрын

fps on the 1050ti goes down to 24 so lame settings for the class of card.

@mbsfaridi

7 жыл бұрын

AllYourBase Just on that game.

@semitope

7 жыл бұрын

mbsfaridi seems 460 stutters only in that game. so whats point

@mbsfaridi

7 жыл бұрын

AllYourBase Not really, check out other games with this gpu on the channel.

@cieuxlux9617

7 жыл бұрын

that's why I swapped from AMD during the 7970 era, the frame times in a few games were horrific due to bad drivers. not saying they're still bad today, I haven't researched it - if Ashes of the Singularity is any sign though, they're still bad.

Lots of folk are mentioning the RX470... well they are right. But what's more shocking is that the 1050ti is underpowered, even by Pascal standards. See how the other Pascal cards fare against, both their predecessor and the next *2 cards* up from that one. You can compare a 1060 to a 980 these days. And yet the 1050ti struggles against the 960. It's much like the 950 in that regard, except this time the gap between 1050ti and 1060 is huge. Price isn't impressive either, considering 960 price drops.

I bought this Zotac 1050 ti recently for an A10- 7860k (4 ghz) mini atx build. (old IBM retro case) I think this card is fantastic especially since my old Kepler card (gtx 660) was cooking the innards of my poor little rig. I'm able to turn all the fan speed settings down inside my rig. (Quiet) The RX 470 would have been the perfect option if it used less wattage and much less heat. I've been testing this card on Doom, Borderlands 2 and Pre-Sequel and so far running smooth at 1080p. (Got 60 fps in Doom on ultra) I was a little weary buying this at first but now can see how capable this card really is. Thanks for the review :)

I have the 1050 ti and man it delivers I was thinking of getting the 1060 or the RX 480 but those cards do carry extra cash. now I'm just saving for the gtx 1080. by the end of February that bad boy will be added to my 6700k.

RX 460 is a joke

@or2kr

7 жыл бұрын

It wasn't meant to play everything at 1080p, its focus lays on e-sports. BTW, you get for 40 bucks more or so a RX470, which destroys the 1050ti like the 1050ti destroys the 460. Also, my 280X may suck more than three times the power of the 1050ti, but is still faster :D

@MegaAgente17

7 жыл бұрын

So what?

@ellypsis603

7 жыл бұрын

the RX 460 2gb model for 100dollars is not bad

@microsista1413

7 жыл бұрын

***** you can get 1050 for 109 which is a lot faster, so...

@ellypsis603

7 жыл бұрын

Karol Jampolski you forgot to mention that you can't find any 1050 for 100 dollars ;) actually in the E.U this card is at 130e...

how is it faster than its equivalent? The rx460 is supposed to compete with the 950, the 1050 is still more expensive while making it basically a 960, so it would compete more with the 470 which for a bit more is also significantly more powerfull.

I just picked up an MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X 3G for a dedicated PhysX card. Looking forward to seeing some gains in heavy PhysX titles.

I always feel that low budget cards with special OC models that ramp up the price kinda defeat the point. Overclocking isn't going to make an unplayable game suddenly playable enough to matter and with the extra cost of OC models, you may as well just save a bit more and get the next card up - like the 1060 in this case

Someone is on Nvidia payrole.. the RX 470 Red Devil run rings on this and has the same price. On the high performance GPUs i agree that Nvidia is the way to go for performance, but budget friendly AMD is the king.

Half height version!!!! Richard and DF Please make a petition or something. Console PCs are stuck with the 750Ti for 4 years now with no end in sight. And these don't even require dedicated PCIe power!!!! Check out the silverstone ML09, you could have a beastly panzerPC (pocket PC) for LANs and people on the go, especially college students who move around every 6 months :D

it doesnt happen often, but this video really was a huge miss. 460 is 40$ cheaper so you cannot compare it to 1050ti. If u already did, 470 is 40$ more expensive and it destroys 1050ti

@tofo7151

7 жыл бұрын

his compaing the 4gb version which is priced at the same with the 1050Ti

gaming x 1050ti £165 in the uk but you can get a 470 for £170

I would love it if you guys did PCB breakdowns as well. I realize the majority of users are pretty ignorant when it comes to that stuff. But it would be very helpful to more advanced users.

Sorry DF, but this comparison is really bad. Not necessarily what Richard says, but the benchmarks of RX 460 vs GTX 1050 TI. You either bench 1050 TI vs RX 470, OR you bennch1050 vs RX 460. But RX 460 vs GTX 1050 TI is like comparing the GTX 1050 TI to a RX 480.

@allupro

7 жыл бұрын

Bullshit, 1050 competes with 460 2GB and 1050 Ti with the 460 4GB.

"faster than its AMD equivalent". Compares it to a 460 instead of a 470

@sndrs

7 жыл бұрын

470 is WAY above the 1050/ti

@somerandoasshatontheintern8337

7 жыл бұрын

the 1050 ti is in the middle of 460 and 470 when it comes to PRICE and PERFORMANCE. not sure why richard said that.

While the AMD and Nvidia fight continues in the comment section, I'm just really glad that these budget cards have improved a lot since the 600 series which is when I started gaming on PC.

I can't get the RX 470 anywhere near a 1050 ti prebuilt price but knowing I will play mostly on 900p/high I'm not at much of a loss.

@fede018

7 жыл бұрын

I have a 900p monitor too! The 1050 ti is fantastic for getting 60fps at high settings and even Ultra (but not on open world games)

@DiegoAlanTorres96

7 жыл бұрын

fede018 Mine is actually a CRT monitor lol but it's at 1680x1050.

it really should be compared with the 470 and 460. Its between both. some 4GB 460 cost same as cheapest 1050 ti. Some 1050 ti cost the same as 470.

Who cares? PS4 PRO HAS 8 TERAFLOPS HAHA AM I RIGHT SONYGERS???? THIS IS 4 THE PAYERS xDxDxD

@UaE0BoSS1

7 жыл бұрын

are you high?

@MrSlashtf2

7 жыл бұрын

Yes but that is not relevant.

@eraezr

7 жыл бұрын

It's actually 8.2 terafalops for 16 bit ops. Do your homework next time, child.

@dh360

7 жыл бұрын

never. not 8 tf

@MrSlashtf2

7 жыл бұрын

It's actually a joke mocking the ignorant Playstation community. Only an idiot would take my statement realistically, use your logic next time. Eraezr

gtx 1050ti by 199€ in spain --> 218$ (not fuckin' worth it )

crap price/performance ratio, just get an RX 470 for 10 bucks more and get much more performance.

@martijndesmit9547

7 жыл бұрын

Ellypsis 63 I hoped it was true.. here is the gtx 1050ti 175$ and the rx 470 220$ so thats a 45$ dollar difference

@ellypsis603

7 жыл бұрын

Martijn De Smit RX 470 is at 175e in the E.U atm 220e is the RX 480 model

@1921sebi

7 жыл бұрын

It's 187€ in Germany, 1050 TI is 155€, so it's a 30€ difference. For a ~30% performance difference. you still pay only 19% extra. RX 470 is still worth it.

@TheFranpito

7 жыл бұрын

30% minimum difference, is more like 40% on dx11 and 50% on dx12

@Rian-qg9fi

7 жыл бұрын

In Australia the cheapest RX 470 is $276 and the cheapest GTX 1050 Ti is $184, that's a $92 dollar difference.

Your videos are pretty low on volume compared to other videos. Could you please fix that? It's sometimes pretty hard to hear, when there's some background noise nearby.

maybe you should do 1050ti budget build vs PS4

@iosonolucaio

7 жыл бұрын

RX 460 runs The Division, Tomb Raider and Crysis 3 at 30fps on native 1080p with everything maxed out, I guess it would be enough

@FailCycle

7 жыл бұрын

What for? 1050Ti and i3 6100(cheapest gaming cpu) alone would cost $250+, PS4 was already selling for $300 previous november, silly comparison, would suck even more against $400 Pro.

@olivernote9162

7 жыл бұрын

VelvetSky1102 the PS4 would lose, unless it's the PS4 pro. Then it would win, but only in graphics the PC has always had frame rate advantage.

@liuby33

7 жыл бұрын

Except 750 Ti is absolute shit running new games, when PS4 still can. Want to be a master race? Pay master money first.

It blows my mind, why do you keep testing low end cards with ultra settings ? we didn't come here to see console performance (not that i hate consoles). Reduce the quality to like medium settings to hit 60fps, thats what pc gamers want.

@DaMedicDemonow

7 жыл бұрын

The reason to do Ultra is to stress the GPUs and see how much performance they can deliver, so obviously if a GPU gives you 40fps at Ultra you're good to go with lower settings for 60fps

@jeffreyhramika8603

7 жыл бұрын

To convince people one is better than the other even when you got a shitty computer, shrug

@Clairvoyant81

7 жыл бұрын

It's simple, really: Ultra settings put more stress on the GPU and reduce potential CPU "bottlenecks" as much as possible. Also... I've been a PC gamer for over 20 years now... in many games I'd rather go with ultra settings at 30 or 40 FPS than drop details to get to 60 FPS. Sure, 60 FPS is nice, but in many games, I just don't care. You should be more annoyed by people testing a GTX 1080 at 1080p... a resolution that clearly bores that GPU to death and gives pretty much useless results.

@z4v3k

7 жыл бұрын

MirelGaming Every game behaves in a different way, you can't run mafia on low settings with 60fps, while you can play battlefield 1 with high settings 60fps.

@z4v3k

7 жыл бұрын

Gem Monger If this was the reason they would test it in 4k and btw you can stres the gpu (low settings) alone with the cpu, to push as many frames as possible.

The problem being that for any game today, 2GB is beginning to be way too short, my GTX760 can still run games on high quality with a good framerate but as soon as I push textures a bit too high, it's a stutter fest.

people complain too much, the fact of the matter is that the 1050ti gets 960 performance with only motherboard power, this is great for mobile markets and low power low budget compact pcs.

I'm just crying here with my GTX 960 2GB. Can't blame myself because I bought it last year. I'm really tempted to get a GTX 1060 now.

@johnconnor2402

7 жыл бұрын

You and me both. For the love of God please get the 6gb 1060. The 3gb is the new 2gb 960 and will be obsolete by end of next year. My 2gb 960 couldn't even play DOOM or ROTTR.

AMD fanboys are mad as hell in the comments! Newsflash! No-one's stopping you from buying the worse product.

when you test can you start testing older gpus that are around the same price now such as throwing the 280X and then as well or comparing the RX 480 to the R9 Fury and the 980 and the GTX 1060

Not sure why it wasn't compared against the RX 470 the whole video, isn't the RX 460 like $50 less now compared to the average 1050ti? and apparently AMD is going to finally fill the gap of the 460 and 470 with the 465 or something soon

@igorrafael7429

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah, fill the gap between them, but what about the hole between RX 480 and nothing? At least, in this particularly case, there's only a "gap" between two gpus, which is better than nothing. They really think themselves as incapable of doing something on par or better than Nvidia GTX 1070/1080 and focus only the low-end market the whole year 2016? That's where we need to see something from AMD, and 'til now, only rumors and more rumors, while the 460x or 465 is on the way already.

@streetguru9350

7 жыл бұрын

Igor Rafael The Fury X is on par with the 1070 reasonably well, but Vega is due until next year, AMD isn't focusing on the high end because it's a much smaller market segment

@Jurigag

7 жыл бұрын

Not 465. 470D, cutted polaris 10 only for china. It will make 1050ti rubbish. It will have same price but 20-30% better performance.

@streetguru9350

7 жыл бұрын

Jurigag Would make it need to have at least 80% of the cores of an RX 470

@Jurigag

7 жыл бұрын

Yes, and it will have exactly around 1792 cores from leaks :)

AMD users raging as fuck, as always.

@asderr77

7 жыл бұрын

NVidia cocksuckers are raging hard as fuck, as always

@jeffreyhramika8603

7 жыл бұрын

Well tell consumers the truth.

@jotunheim5302

7 жыл бұрын

Why? The RX 470 smashes the 1050 ti for a little more $$$ Ti is for what exactly? Oh yeah better cards than the 1050 *ti* pftt hahah

@nicholasrivera9280

7 жыл бұрын

Lone Survivor And the 1060 3G model smashes the RX 470, for just a little more. But this has nothing to do with those cards, its the low end RX 460 vs the 1050ti.

@MegaAgente17

7 жыл бұрын

HellFire Wait... aren't you a console peasant? The one that rages as fuck when PC rapes console on every video comparison from DF? The guy that gets pissed off by defending potatoes against PC? What The Heck are you doing here?

In price RX470 is 1050ti equivalent and 470 blows it out of this universe, 460 is MUCH cheaper lol. Im not even sure why 460 is in the video instead 470....

How are these comparable when in a lot of countries the pricing is like this: RX 460 = €130 GTX 1050 Ti = €190 RX 470 = €220

Isn't comparing the 1050ti to the rx 460 like comparing the 1050ti to the gtx 1060 3gb in that the price level is different. The 1050ti is 30-40% more expensive than the rx460. The 1050 is more direct competition and it still beats the rx460 handily most of the time, but if you are in the market for a monitor and low end video card for a normal pc case then the rx460 comes into its own now that freesync monitors offer next to no premium over non-freesync monitors now. One other thing this review glossed over that is incredibly relevent for this price bracket is the different form factors the 1050 comes in compared to the rx460. You can get single slot and SFF 1050's but you can't get them for the rx460. This review is not up to the usual digital foundry standards as there is alot of information missing from it and this one should be taken with a grain of salt until.

Unless you have a prebuilt PC, require low power and heat, or have a strict budget, there is no reason someone would go with these cards over the 480/1060.

Still rocks in 2023...I am glad I am not just pray falling into people's traps of buying out 1060 or perhaps 1070...so long games are optimized, your card is great bang for buck just remember...😊

got mine today and for the price the performance is brilliant.

Someone please answer ! Will this card bottleneck much with i3 2120 3.3 Ghz ! ? I am currently using a GTX 750 Ti and planning to get a GTX 1050 Ti soon !

@zombiedeutsch

7 жыл бұрын

Amit Roy lol. i watch ur videos man, ur cpu has aged, but still good for 30fps+ my advice buy 1060 6gb or 480x 470x using amd card ur performance will suffer more in dx11 due to slow cpu. this affects amd cards onnly

@GamerInVoid

7 жыл бұрын

Using a 1060 with this CPU will be so much underwhelming as it will be highly bottlenecked. The problem is i can buy a new cpu but then il have to chnge my mobo as well and dat would turn a normal upgrade to massive one ! :(

@FailCycle

7 жыл бұрын

No, AMD gpus are ~2 times more cpu-dependant, that fact has been established many times even on this channel. With something like i3 2120 you *will* get much lower fps in cpu-heavy games with 480, than what you would have with 1050Ti, so much for "Powahh!".

@zombiedeutsch

7 жыл бұрын

FailCycle thanks for clarification Amit Roy​ you dont need any new mobo. Just get a core i7 2600k or 3rd gen i7 3370 or 3770k?!? U can get these for cheap second hand. About 4% performance difference between each gen.

@zombiedeutsch

7 жыл бұрын

Googy User amd gpus has bad dx11 driver optimization which will make ur games use more cpu power and bog down fps. This veey noticeable in these low end dual core cpus Quad cores aew affected but not that much, theres always more performance in reserve. Search this channel, amd dx11 cpu bottleneck. Then tell me who is the idiot

I think we need a 1050 Ti "boost" like old GTX 650 Ti boost. To be more closer to RX 470. And 650 Ti boost was almost close to 660 in performance.

Budget gaming, on an i7 6700K Overclocked? !! whaaat Dear Guys @DigitalFoundry , please do mind that a budget gamer won't go over an i3 2dual core 4hyperthreaded and an entry level to mid range uses i5 6600 please do include those CPUs in future videos, alongside moderate Ram frequency "2133mhz" since it is the max supported on any chipset less than Z170, which most of the gamers have. Thank you. Please do read my comment #Richard_Leadbetter #Tom_DigitalFoundry #Dave_DigitalFoundry

@WM_46

7 жыл бұрын

If you're trying to compare strictly video cards and not a build, why would you introduce something that might bottleneck a card?

@hisgr8nessmadzak

7 жыл бұрын

because that is the common gaming setup an average consumer do use.

Hi! Will the MSI model you have on your left work WITHOUT the 6 pin plugged?

so would better go with amd rx 480 4gb dddr5 price here in the usa is going for $219

Put a bit more and get the 1060 3gb instead.

@hussainsajid4929

7 жыл бұрын

VaJohn push a bit more and get Titan x sli instead

@junioralves662

7 жыл бұрын

No, put a bit more and get RX 470. This card is dead, 3GB will be a bottleneck for it.

@VaJohn

7 жыл бұрын

***** For 1080p budget gaming 3gb is enough plus it's 10% faster in fps.

@rohanofgondor

7 жыл бұрын

Junior Alves LOL 470 is already dead in front of 1050Ti, so forget about future.

@ellypsis603

7 жыл бұрын

no better get an RX 470

Would be curious to see them in SLI with overclocks.

The 1050ti is a really good card and it's still holding up well. I play most of the recent games at 1080/60fps with pretty much high settings. With BFV I had to turn the settings down to medium but it still performs and looks better than on consoles.

One question. If you buy a 1050 ti oc, does that mean that it's already overclocked and so i need cooling when a buy this graphics card ?

I don't see why you campare a 100$ msrp gpu vs 140$ msrp ?! when the closest one is the RX 470 with 169$ msrp

of course percentage differentials will be bigger when both cards aren't reaching above 50 fps to begin with.

It would be interesting to compare this year's budget cards against the cards of old. Is 1050ti faster then gtx 580 or 480?

The 1050ti makes no sense. Either you go cheap and go for the regular 1050 or you go "big" and shell out for the RX470

Does compatible to gigabyte H61M-S2P board, i7 3770 3.4Ghz? Will render a 4K video faster? Is it worth buying?

How many 100 years has MSI used this cooler with same colors applied?

pascal overclocks great, but doesn't seem to do much. just a small overclock on my kepler gpu gives huge performance gains in games vs. a massive oc to pascal. no doubt pascal is better, just an observation.

those guys who throw's extra cash for factory overclocked and custom cooler model this video is for you !!

I still have no idea why AMD thought that the 460 was fast enough.

GTX 1050 Ti beats RX460 4GB in almost every game while consuming less power. Both are made on same 14nm This proves that Pascal is better architecture than Polaris. I'm not talking about price, but I'm just that technology wise, nvidia did better job

im thinking about buying.... will it fit in the DELL XPS 8700 Standard??

Nice video richard and yeah 1050 is budget king i paired with i5 2500 16 gb ddr3 and i have decent setting i can play nfs payback mixed with high and ultra on 55 fps bf1 ultra on 72 fps ROTTR on 60 fps down to 49 51 in some place

I would of brought an overclocked 1050 ti for £100 but £150 from some retailers made me order a RX 470.

1050 is the one should be compared to 460, but 1050 is a lot more expensive, at least in Canada

What about consumption? idle and fully loaded?

Richard, when are you planning to update the selection of games for benchmarking? There are a lot of new games much more relevant than Crysis 3 or Ashes...

I hope either AMD or Nvidia produces a half height card with these cards. The last best was the 750ti. It's a great card but showing it's age. I might have to buy a new case and PSU if this doesn't happen. I like my case though so here's hoping.

460 and 1050 are not worth it at all. Go for 470/480 or 1060 3GB/6GB.

@GregoryCunningham

7 жыл бұрын

Or wait for the 470D.

You make some very good videos and analysations. Unfortunately the blatant bias against AMD is perfectly clear here considering this and other comparisons. The 1050ti is about 30% more expensive than the RX460 and is also about 30% faster in DX11 titles, which in those cases makes the price/performance the same. In DX12 and Vulkan both cards get quite close to one another. This means overall that the RX460 is a better deal. Then you also simply "forget" to mention the RX470, which other commenters have already presented as a much better deal to the consumer. Considering that you clearly have a bias towards NVidia which is shown by you leaving out evidence that shows AMD as a better choice, your journalistic integrity has been compromised, which is why I can no longer support this channel.

What's the difference between the 1050 ti and the 1050 ti mini?

I think its still worthing more buying a GTX 1060 3Gb than the 1050ti.

@shrekdreck2429

7 жыл бұрын

what the fuck is a GTX 1069 3Gb

@jonathanraecrisanto5912

7 жыл бұрын

Kait0s! LOL Highlights I agree. 1050Ti is too underclocked. I'd rather buy 1060 3GB

In my country and in many others RX 470 and GTX 1050Ti costs close to the same and the RX 470 is much better. So no, it's not the "budget king".

@Sinier940n

7 жыл бұрын

The card just came out. Give it 2 weeks, the prices will go down to msrp levels.

@MrDitkovich

7 жыл бұрын

Just like the 1070 MSRP lol.

In my country the price of 1050ti is almost the same as 470 and 460 is way cheaper!

I'm interested to see how the 1050 performs.

On the Zotac model not needing a new power supply, will it work in an i3 6100t with integrated graphics (Intel HD 530) and 8 gigs of memory, Dell Inspiron 3650 with it's piddly 240 watt power supply, without making something burn out? While i couldn't afford to spend much on a new PC, i got the Inspiron in a flash sale for €395 (with free delivery) two weeks ago, when it would have been €450 (and €480 without the included free delivery) and i've been impressed how well it runs my admittedly mostly four year old plus games at generally max settings, i'm well aware how small its' power supply is and how much it limits the system in terms of future upgrading potential with only nvidia's barely better than the HD 530, Gt 730 and a similar AMD card officially cleared to work in the system without straining the supply - the nearly twelve year old HP Pavilion i replaced with the Inspiron has a 300 watt power supply in it... :) .

@alduinbaneofkings7704

7 жыл бұрын

tanner1ie how many amperes on 12v rail?

@tanner1ie

7 жыл бұрын

Alduin bane of kings I don't really know anything about the internal details or technical specifications of the system, only what i've read online. While i indeed opened up my Pavilion to dust it out two times (both times after it failed to turn on, but the dusting fixed at least that problem :) ), i only know it has a 300 watt supply because that's what a sticker inside said :) . I found the following two threads on Dell forums of people discussing upgrading my PC. :- en.community.dell.com/support-forums/desktop/f/3515/t/19990438 en.community.dell.com/support-forums/desktop/f/3514/t/19989122 Funnily enough in the first post (and the more recent post from them), the same Dell support person only mentions the nvidia GT 730 and the AMD R9-360 as being validated to run with the stock system's power supply, while in the earlier post they said both the GTX 750 ti and RX 460 will work with the power supply. Lastly there's a nearly three month old video of someone putting an RX 460 into the same system with no mention of other upgrades. I'm going to ask in the comments of that video has anyone done the same and had zero problems since... :) .

I'm targeting a $800 build to use with the objection of 60 fps on most contemporary games @ 1080p OS and monitor need not apply to overall budget, what graphics card should I be looking at?

@estebanzd9434

7 жыл бұрын

1060 is a safer bet than 1050ti. If you want future proof, go for the 6GB model.

@hellowalkman4506

7 жыл бұрын

how long do you want to keep the gpu ??

@madseason5614

7 жыл бұрын

hello walkman around 5 to 7 years would be great.

@hellowalkman4506

7 жыл бұрын

wow in that case an 8gb rx 480 would be the best. along with a skylake i5

what game would you guys say is the most demanding on PC?