'Not Like The Nine Greatest Experts On The Internet’: Kagan Makes Supreme Court Laugh During Hearing

Justice Elena Kagan questions Eric Schnapper, the lawyer on behalf of Gonzales, in oral arguments of Gonzalez v. Google Oral Argument, a case in which the Supreme Court considers how responsible major social media platforms-Twitter, Facebook, KZread, especially-are for their most dangerous posts.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com

Пікірлер: 26

  • @djveles4629
    @djveles4629 Жыл бұрын

    Algorithm is a fancy way of saying human manipulated programs with a determined outcome.

  • @JonathanSterlingUSA

    @JonathanSterlingUSA

    Жыл бұрын

    Yes, of course. Programming has as much intent as any other action.

  • @MorningStarChrist
    @MorningStarChrist Жыл бұрын

    So most of the search engines don't actually host any content. There's nothing malicious about this, it's purely practical. A website is capable of displaying images from another website via what's called an img tag. Where you can add an "href" attribute that allows you to display an image from another website on your website. A link if you will. This allows the data storage of the search engine to be saved as they would only need to store a 100 byte string as opposed to a 1 Gigabyte file. I would say that you can tell these companies that hosting of certain images is outlawed by the whim of regulation due to the fact that these entities are business, "commerce"; but the way the ISP, internet service provider, is set up, the common man cannot just host their own website without first paying the internet company for "business" internet. Which costs 100 dollars more than standard internet, in some cases. We need to make the Internet free to access somehow. Or at the very least make it free for the citizens to host their own websites without having to pay extra fees. As this would perfectly address the issue of the 1st amendment being violated, relative to the internet.

  • @bajamerica
    @bajamerica Жыл бұрын

    Private conversation vs. Public conversation sharing Freedom of speech vs. Right to listen or not listen. AT&T voice conversation vs. Publicly available announcements. Censoring the Content of individual posts vs. Cancelling individuals for their political persuasion. If what is IN THE TWEET/POST is illegal or defamatory, it is subject to civil lawsuit or criminal procedure. IE: CONSEQUENCES The POST should be regulated, not the PERSON. SECTION 230 should not be the enforcer/ judge / jury of PEOPLE. CATEGORIES of regulated speech (porn, child endangerment. REAL national security, bullying) can be regulated by the community through complaints, or legal procedures, removal pending adjudication or trial). Free speech shall not be INFRINGED, but there are consequences. The right or OPPORTUNITY to LISTEN, is a decision by the listener, not Big Tech, nor Government.

  • @rustyshackleford4942
    @rustyshackleford4942 Жыл бұрын

    I love Justice Thomas’s laugh

  • @WayCoolJr27
    @WayCoolJr27 Жыл бұрын

    Until AWS is broken into smaller companies, nothing will change.

  • @tiffparz8749
    @tiffparz8749 Жыл бұрын

    The fact that he can so eloquently and thoroughly explain these things for everyone to understand, is comforting (NOT !)

  • @westrnite
    @westrnite Жыл бұрын

    Quit wasting "WE THE PEOPLES PRECIOUS TIME!"........

  • @marieang112bbbb
    @marieang112bbbb Жыл бұрын

    😀

  • @jonathann.foster1809
    @jonathann.foster1809 Жыл бұрын

    Chief Justice Roberts 2015 Artificial Intelligence Algorithm 'Nano Bots' currently ?

  • @GaryKemple-mx9ci
    @GaryKemple-mx9ci5 ай бұрын

    That im on drug I dont di this duty job in frontnof world im not animol

  • @ep2223
    @ep2223 Жыл бұрын

    Like Kagan said, she ain't the sharpest tool in the shed! This is not the first time she has demonstrated that either!

  • @jonathann.foster1809
    @jonathann.foster1809 Жыл бұрын

    "The most widely cited law book in the world By Editor in Chief Bryan A. Garner, the world’s leading legal lexicographer, the 11th edition in the most authoritative, comprehensive law dictionary ever published" Black's Law Dictionary defines 'DIVERSITY' - a Biological Man's DNA and a Biological Woman's DNA (1986) - Integrity- DNA - iDNA and its believed US Supreme Court Justice Thomas is licensed in a 'DIVERSE' Marriage refer to the Defensive Marriage Act of 1996 to a Section portion thereof the Respect for Marriage Act of 2022. (Yo! Clarence, ya get it ? Improved technology of Miniscule Droplets for Material Evidence TEST results pending case of ancestry (instructions) genealogy 2021).

  • @andresd4464
    @andresd4464 Жыл бұрын

    Forbes is Chinese owned

  • @aaabbb-py5xd

    @aaabbb-py5xd

    Жыл бұрын

    Where the fuck did you get that from? And what's wrong with that? Plenty "free world" "journalists" crawling around China pretending China has no "press" "freedom". Compared to the track record of the "free world", you might have some hope still if you ban all your "journalists" and let China do the talking.

  • @GaryKemple-mx9ci
    @GaryKemple-mx9ci5 ай бұрын

    No we don't like it for are futurits evil to us

  • @GaryKemple-mx9ci
    @GaryKemple-mx9ci5 ай бұрын

    Its rong yhis yo do in life

Келесі