Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259 Share this video!

@adriandwalker

8 ай бұрын

Harder

If it weren't for Noam Chomsky, I honestly would have started to believe that I'm crazy for being like this. Thank you, professor.

@josenavarrete8709

3 жыл бұрын

a gate keeper never examin 9/11 liar all the way

@walidsadaoui8238

3 жыл бұрын

You are!!!

@streetwisepioneers4470

3 жыл бұрын

I've seen this very same comment on another link.

@budgibson185

3 жыл бұрын

@@streetwisepioneers4470 he goes up and down the comment page lol

Listening to Dr.Chomsky after 20 years is like finding a solution to puzzle

@mikeodee1164

4 ай бұрын

the many severly sick in the head and very dangerous so called normal americans i delt with for many years im not suprised my country usa is a terrorist country

Truly a genius, a man worthy of a statue if anyone.

This is the first Chomsky talk I ever watched after the 9/11 attack as it was aired.

This guy is a walking history library.

@josenavarrete8709

3 жыл бұрын

a liar gatekeeper

@charliekowittmusic

3 жыл бұрын

@@josenavarrete8709 How is he gatekeeping anybody else from doing anything? This guy is a walking encyclopedia who carries water for nobody. If there were evidence to the contrary in 9/11 you can bet your ass Chomsky would’ve published 20 books on it already.

@sammosaurusrex

2 жыл бұрын

@@charliekowittmusic It’s really not worth it - this guy is either a far-left “Chomsky is an elitist and out of touch with the people because he knows a lot of things and won’t condone the atrocities of my preferred rebel group” type, or a right wing loon who believes Chomsky is a deranged socialist who just hates America and supported the Khmer Rouge and denied the holocaust and all the other usual lies and smears. Bothering to figure out which, or worse, trying to change their mind, is an exercise in futility that will wear down your nerves and leave you nothing to show for it. Better to leave it be

@Hector-rn3ff

7 ай бұрын

@@charliekowittmusicwhich is why historians don’t take him seriously right? Because he’s just so intelligent and awe inspiring and has such a large published bibliography. God I’m shocked

@charliekowittmusic

7 ай бұрын

@@Hector-rn3ff Historians don’t agree on anything, and they certainly don’t agree on Noam Chomsky lol. Chomsky is a one in a century intellectual, and nothing you say can change that. He has read tens of thousands of books, and had lifetime tenure at MIT for having the greatest base of knowledge, and the most analytical mind of his entire generation. He broke the code and gave us modern linguistics. Manufacturing Consent is still recognized as the best critique of mass media since it was written. He’s published over 100 works, and they all have unimpeachable citations for his direct and unequivocal claims. Noam Chomsky schooled Bill Buckley on his own show, when he was just a young man. Exposing every gap in Buckley’s knowledge, and politely dismantling his every argument. And he’s been an activist his entire life, fighting for civil rights and Justice every time he conceivably could. So you’re wrong. Even those who disagree with Noam take him VERY seriously, if they are real intellectuals, instead of know-nothing pundits.

Chomsky is talking about himself when he refers to the Martian. Except in his case, he can't go back to Mars.

@andrewkessler895

5 ай бұрын

I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought that 😂

Great content and everything, but don't you think it's strange you upload these Chomsky lectures and your name is "manufacturing intellect" and Chomsky's most famous work is "manufacturing consent"? I mean, it's not exactly a positive connotation lol

@kx7500

3 жыл бұрын

Maybe but maybe it’s supposed to be like an antithesis to it

@theclimberupwards1169

3 жыл бұрын

Its like poetry, it rhymes

@caseydahl1952

3 жыл бұрын

@@theclimberupwards1169 it's gunna be great

01:16:10 made me lol

Wonder what he thinks about tower 7?

@t33nyplaysp0p

4 ай бұрын

1:21:11 And probably what normal people who look up reliable information think about Tower 7. That it was hit by falling debris that was on fire and subsequently destabilized the building. There is an entire NIST report publicly available with the country's leading engineers giving their assessment.... There are more interesting things including science fiction in the world than the nonsense about tower 7

@user-jj2to4jb5w

2 ай бұрын

What is there to think? It’s a financial building, just like all the rest in the world trade complex, that got damaged by burning debris and a nearby collapse that caused its foundation to further deteriorate itself, leading to its own collapse.

19:06

He loves that damn Coat 😂😂 Dont he ?

too little exposure for this(

3:40 1:09:18 1:15:49 1:24:22 1:26:45

The 'smart version ' of the mainstream narrative! The smugness.

Ohh Noam ... You belive in official narative..

@franz909

3 жыл бұрын

Strange , at the very least he should support an independent investigation and his support for globalism and international institutions is suspect.

@JeffVader39

4 ай бұрын

Only because it makes more sense than an inside job , oh and he understands the history behind it

@t33nyplaysp0p

4 ай бұрын

You missed his entire point about globalism. It's amazing that you dorks ​dont understand the terminology and the focus of the critiques, yet think you're within the realm of critiquing the father of modern linguistics...@@franz909

Sorry but, I'm noticing to much "beating around the bush".

Here's an intelligent question Noam Chomsky. How could the top 15% of a building Crush straight through the bottom healthy part of the 85% of its structure? For some reason people listen to you and you're doing them a disservice

@stankowalski4574

4 жыл бұрын

It's called gravity. The trusses and steel columns of the WTC were not made to hold up tons of steel "descending" upon them from above; they were designed to hold a static load. The amount of kinetic energy produced by the collapsing upper part of the towers was more than sufficient to exceed the the weight baring load capacity of the floors below it. The resulting kinetic energy is a function of speed and mass of the object. The greater the speed and mass of the object, the greater the kinetic energy produced.

@johnsherman6718

3 жыл бұрын

@@stankowalski4574 You obviously are not a physicist.

@2beinteresting

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnsherman6718 kzread.info/dash/bejne/eK56k62yg6vThaQ.html

@antimattv

3 жыл бұрын

While you continue focusing a laser beam on a rather irrelevant point, Chomsky will go on beating down the institutions you claim to despise. You people really need to wake up.

@danielzielke9997

2 жыл бұрын

@@stankowalski4574 and "when then" would a truss or supporting column ever have any utility "holding up" any part of a building structure if -- as you say -- all it has to worry about is "ascending" weight, which would necessitate its required to be held DOWN, rather than held UP? Only constructed to hold a "static load" ...? Where did you read that? Not what we heard from the designers of these buildings who gave their expert testimony to the opposite!

Noam Chomsky's intellect and ways of gathering and expressing information has long been impressive. It's not uncommon though, for intelligent people to be wrong about certain things, weak in a certain area, and for Chomsky it's the forensic aspects of the incidents of 9/11/01. Maybe it cognitive dissonance.

@josenavarrete8709

3 жыл бұрын

fuck the intelect he is a GATEKEEPER

Evidence says, if not proves 11/09/201 was the very say coalition US/Israel carried out that act; Normie Why wont you say it? The official report is boringly wrong (lies) Great lecture..5*

this is the boring KZread I have ever tried to watch.

I suspect the Martian, if given an objective run down of human history and human nature, would conclude that the US is the least imperfect nation having put far more on the positive side of the ledger than the negative.

@felixusbrendelus6357

2 жыл бұрын

Genocide of native population, century of slavery, waging war around the globe, flushing democratic values down the shitter in favour of corporations and the unleashing of wall street are only the first and really obvious negatives i could think of.

@AA-sn9lz

Жыл бұрын

Lmaoooo

Must keep to the program must keep to the program must keep t. .................

9 minutes in on 2x speed and he has literally said nothing of substance. What is the point?

@thechurchofmeat6591

3 жыл бұрын

@Lucas Allison He doesn’t have a point. Simply a left loonie that has been irrelevant for decades. Almost 20 years have past since this speech. As usual, Chomsky was wrong.

@thechurchofmeat6591

3 жыл бұрын

@Lucas Allison Put it this way- Chomsky gave an interview where he made the claim that every US president committed massive war crimes. The response did not go well. Why? How do you put FDR and Truman in the same category as Hitler and Stalin? LBJ and Nixon in the same league as Mao and Pol Pot? This is why he gets dismissed as a left wing whacko- because he is.

@thechurchofmeat6591

3 жыл бұрын

@Bbjones Jones It’s incredible since the “might makes right” argument doesn’t seem to bother Noam when his socialist friends in Russia or China did it. Millions dead in China over an economic experiment? More than acceptable. Millions dead during Stalin’s time? No problem. Arabs killing Jews in the ME? He could live with that. The boy pushed this nonsense for decades and now he is completely irrelevant due to his nonsense. Your boy doesn’t care about oppression as long as his friends are doing the oppressing. And as for death- old Noam is 92 and is has become meaningless for decades.

@budgibson185

3 жыл бұрын

@@thechurchofmeat6591 for a meaningless old man you sure have followed him for a long ass time lol

@thechurchofmeat6591

3 жыл бұрын

@@budgibson185 yup

GATEKEEPER!!!!

@antimattv

3 жыл бұрын

Every time I think I'm making inroads with right wing people, you end up saying something like that. Good Lord...

@rodneypower9368

3 жыл бұрын

@@antimattv explain 911 from Noam’s point of view

@rodneypower9368

3 жыл бұрын

@@antimattv I felt the same way you do .. and a part of me still does .. however after examining his views on 911 .. I was shell shocked!! He actbelieves that Middle East terrorists did this .. or does he ??? He also said who really cares about the shooting death of Kennedy.. just another shooting no big deal .. (paraphrasing here) makes one think he could be protecting something here ..

@rodneypower9368

3 жыл бұрын

@@antimattv your views on this Matt ??!!

@antimattv

3 жыл бұрын

@@rodneypower9368 I gotta say, not a lot of people call me by my first name these days. I'm honored. Usually I just get "hey you". Anyway, the point is clear. The detailed specifics are not as important as the general trends. This is how I see it vis a vis 911. Saudi extremist groups with close ties to American power circles could have easily bought and bribed their way into the exact locations they needed to be to accomplish the attack. The point is that US imperialism, hegemony and ultraviolence all accross the globe have made many extremist factions (though compared to what most US administrations have historically done to other countries doesn't seem like much by comparison) even more committed to vengeance. I, and Noam, by the way, wholeheartedly disagree with those kinds of acts. However, it's always important to look at the actions of ones own nation. No country in the history of the earth has had as much power, wealth, privilege and military might as the USA. It has used that might to control and terrorize the world for many decades. American administrations are responsible for aiding and abetting (through coups, arms deals, money and training) ruthless dictators and neo fascist governments in countries from central America all the way to central Asia and beyond. Take John F. Kennedy for example. He was an ultra hawk dedicated to the continuation of the war on South Vietnam. His entire family is steeped in blood and misery. There are stories about those people. Anyway, it's just how US power has unfolded in world affairs. But to deal with your main issue. Does it really matter whether Saudi fanatics, or Bush family cohorts blew up those towers? Does it really matter if Kennedy was assassinated by a lone gunman or 8 gangsters working for LBJ? No! Because the amount of terrorism and brutal violence that the US commits against other, often innocent and even democratic weaker countries is beyond imagining. The devastation caused by US hegemony is hard to calculate but lets set some basic numbers. Just in the war in Indo China, the US bombing campaigns caused hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths of civilians in Cambodia, Laos and Vietam (mostly south but also north). The US directly supported (military aid, arms, training officers) the vicious Suharto regime in Indonesia when it murdered hundreds of thousands of it's own peasants. Then again when it invaded (with direct US support) East Timor. Next onto Afghanistan and Iraq millions of refugees, millions of dead by brutal food and medicine sanctions. Then also hundreds of thousands of people murdered during a war of the greatest military power in human history against the practically insignificant speck that was Iraq. Saddam? Do you know what his crime was? It was disobeying the master. Because all those atrocities he committed were when he had direct support from the US. I could go on and on and on. But the point is this: as a purveyor of endless ultra violence in the world, the US should never ever act surprised when they get even a microscopic fraction of what people in other countries have to live with on a daily basis. And they know full well where the violence comes from! And most people in the world still greatly believe in good relations with America. But when a few garden variety terrorists occasionally commit a smaller version of the terror that is inflicted by the US. The only things that lead people to be so shocked and surprised is utter hypocrisy and an extremely effective propaganda system. The US intelligencia give Stalinist Russia a run for its money in terms of subservience to the state. Please continue researching this. I enjoyed talking with you today!

Chomsky missed his calling- he should have defected to the USSR in the 1950s

@charliekowittmusic

3 жыл бұрын

You must be 70+ years old if you’ve been so inundated with anti-Soviet propaganda that everybody who speaks out against U.S. doctrine is a “USSR defector”. Did you install a fallout shelter in your basement as well? Do you own Hunt for Red October and Red Dawn on VHS?

@thechurchofmeat6591

3 жыл бұрын

@@charliekowittmusic No, I’m not over 70. No, I don’t have either movie on VHS but read Red October. Regardless, Chomsky is a Marxist who didn’t have a problem with Stalin’s Russia nor Maos China. Yet, he got everything wrong on 911- all this means is that Chomsky is out of touch with the ordinary person.

@charliekowittmusic

3 жыл бұрын

@@thechurchofmeat6591 Oy! Why do you keep saying he “has no problem” with Stalin, etc? 1.) Where’s your evidence he’s okay with those things?? Just one shred!! 2.) Why would Noam need to spend his time insulting a universally maligned dictator from 100 years ago? To what end? Chomsky is a life-long anarcho-syndicalist!! That has nothing to do with Stalinism. Since you’re probably a White Guy who lives in the West, should you have to disavow slavery and indigenous cleansing every single time you talk about anything?! Totally illogical.

@thechurchofmeat6591

3 жыл бұрын

@@charliekowittmusic I have listened to him over the years. Chomsky said on many occasions how every US president was guilty of war crimes and you don’t hear a thing about “the big picture”. You don’t hear a thing about what the 2 superpowers were doing. Everything is a criticism of the west while praising Marxist theory. Misinformation is big with the Chomsky’s and Finklestein’s of the world- Chomsky was speaking about the Khazar theory as though it was a scientific fact- when he was raked over the coals for it he immediately backed down. In other words, he knew it was a lie. That’s the problem- unless you know the granular details you have no idea if he is stating fact or his propaganda BS. As for slavery and native Americans- since I did not participate- I don’t have to say anything. If you want me to say it was wrong, sure- I will agree. But here you are not getting the point-CHOMSKY NEVER AND I MEAN SAID ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT THOSE CAUSES THAT HE LOVES. This makes him a hypocrite and thus irrelevant

@charliekowittmusic

3 жыл бұрын

@@thechurchofmeat6591 For your logic to be consistent, Chomsky should only say something about Stalin If HE played a role in Stalinist Russia. 1.) You’re being inconsistent. 2.) I just googled “Chomsky critical of Stalin” and the FIRST result includes Chomsky calling the Bolshevik regime liars and the USSR fake Socialists! Knowing Chomsky he has probably written on this subject dozens of times. You’re literally just making stuff up!!! You’re trying to tell me you’ve gone through his 100+ published books, plus lectures, and speeches but you never once Googled to check? 😂 Clearly you have an axe to grind that has nothing to do with your BS claims. So what is it?

Some people just talk too much without making any straight point or sense. Can't make out what he is trying to say and what his purpose is and what his believes are. Utter nonsense

@tonywords6713

4 жыл бұрын

one hasto wonder if you're someone who also says you like trump because hes a straight talked

@sammosaurusrex

2 жыл бұрын

@@tonywords6713 lol

@sammosaurusrex

2 жыл бұрын

I have to say, this is my favorite comment in the whole comments section. “I can’t make out what his [agenda] is or what his beliefs are.” Implicit is this statement is that you can’t stand people feeding you straight facts - you’re admitting that you crave people to tell you how to think. Also funny that Noam does in fact have a plain agenda and set of beliefs here - terrorism is bad no matter who does it, and the worst terrorist crimes by the United States own definition of terrorism are perpetrated by the United States and its collaborators. He also points out that the conversation on “how to define terrorism is ridiculous,” because the United States simply desires the definition of terrorism to be “terrorist act committed by ‘them,’ not by ‘us,’ “ and so the intellectual exercise of seeking a “definition” of terrorism is merely seeking a set of parameters which will indict enemies of the United States while leaving out crimes committed by the United States by definition. He notes that the basis for international law and the international legal system are rooted in this practice, with the Nuremburg and Tokyo trials carefully omitting terror bombings, perfidy, or other crimes which the Allied powers were guilty of, so that only the losing powers would face justice before tribunals. If you listen to the facts (instead of obsessively looking for opinions so you can decide whether this is a tribe you should reflexively denounce or one you should blindly follow), you just might learn something