As a Z9 owner, the day I have both Z9 and Z9H on my each shoulder would be glorious and also somewhat painful… due to the weights.

@lour7753

Ай бұрын

Can’t wait for my Z9 to be the backup camera for my Z9H.

I have been using the A9III for 4 month now, shooting more than 30'000 sports and concert photographs. There will be thousends of sports photographers shooting sports at the soccer european championship and olympic games. So why wait until the games are over?

@4KLiveV2

Ай бұрын

They cannot gather enough parts to manufacture enough units for everyone, only the Nikon Ambassador with have their test unit same for the Canon R1

Have the Z9. If this information is factually correct i would order 2 bodies and i say its a RED sensor.

@UnconventionalReasoning

Ай бұрын

There is zero chance a Z9 with a RED sensor will be released this summer.

@NikCan66

Ай бұрын

@@UnconventionalReasoning think Nikon is not going to let Canon r1 or Sony stay in the spotlight without something being mentioned

@UnconventionalReasoning

Ай бұрын

@@NikCan66 The Canon R1 is also vaporware. There has been too little time since the acquisition of RED for any hardware sharing to happen.

@4KLiveV2

Ай бұрын

@@UnconventionalReasoning they will make enough test units for their ambassadors for use in the Olympics

@UnconventionalReasoning

Ай бұрын

@@4KLiveV2 There is nothing that Nikon is ready to put into a Z9H, and the incentive to make a low-mp camera seems to be almost non-existent.

We hear "knee-con" at the beginning and then "n'eye-con" a bit later. Make up your mind, AI voice. LOL

A reduction in pixels will be an adavantage for sports photographers who often shoot in very low light.45mp was too much for the Z9,many pro togs say it is poor in low light compared to the D5 and D6.MP's in the 20's will be ideal.

@2klember

2 ай бұрын

Fully agree. I own both D6 and D5 also D4s D3s and D3. I got Zf but no Z9 just because of the 46mpx sensor. It would be great if Nikon could deliver a new flagship with a 20 or 24 mpx sensor.

@UnconventionalReasoning

Ай бұрын

A lot of people buy into the myth that the lower megapixels result in significantly better low light performance.

@2klember

Ай бұрын

Its not just myth. Sweet spot is 20mpx.​@UnconventionalReasoning

@UnconventionalReasoning

Ай бұрын

@@2klember It is myth, there is no such thing as a "sweet spot". People pixel peep to see the noise, when the images are practically the same when views at the same size, like full-screen on a monitor. We're also over-analyzing the images in a way that nobody else ever cares.

@orsoncart9441

Ай бұрын

@@UnconventionalReasoning It's larger pixels that are better in low light so 45 v 20 on the same size sensor IS better in low light.No Myth about it.

Sony makes Nikon sensors

@joekelly9369

Ай бұрын

Nikon make them work with correct colours !

@bsc001

25 күн бұрын

On Nikon Litography machines :) Please bear in mind, Sony (old Konica-Minolta acquisition) is a very small division of Sony, and the division fabbing the sensors has been doing this from well before said acquisition. TSMC makes AMD, Apple, Qualcomm and new Intel will be fabbed by TSMC as well. Fabhouse are just that. Quite a few of Nikon’s sensors are their own design.

Nobody is buzzing with rumors about a Z9H camera, that's a figment of somebody's imagination.

Big deal ,won,t be buying one

@2klember

2 ай бұрын

I will get two. Z9 and Z8 are overkill because of the high mpx sensor.

@UnconventionalReasoning

Ай бұрын

@@2klember You'll save a lot of money, because the non-existent Z9H will cost $0 USD.

@2klember

Ай бұрын

@@UnconventionalReasoning lol I don't really need one. I have my DSLR's which gave me plenty of options.