Correction, see update on S-line, all the information you need right here. Thanks to @jkldb4815 for pointing it out. www.nikonusa.com/learn-and-explore/c/products-and-innovation/s-line-a-badge-of-honor-for-nikkor-z-lenses

S line and non S line lenses don't have anything to do with flange distance and inner mount diameter, the S line is superior because of the lens coatings and special glass elements

@francoismasuabi

Ай бұрын

Thank you very much for pointing this out, I have pined a comment with a link to the S-line information to ensure correct information is shared. Appreciate the feedback.

They are indeed smart in this approach 👏🏻. And this lens will not only attract the Z6iii buyers but also people with older Z bodies.

@francoismasuabi

Ай бұрын

Exactly. Watch out for a lot of videos coming from various creators about this lens.

The 35 1.2 is still coming

@francoismasuabi

Ай бұрын

This will be a beast of a lens when it comes out. Definitely out of my budget...for now

Thank You Francois!

@francoismasuabi

27 күн бұрын

You are welcome!

s line and non s line, have the same flange distance both are mirrorless design lenses

@francoismasuabi

4 күн бұрын

Hey man. Yes I found that out afterwards. I pinned a comment stating my errors and directing everyone to a specific link. Had to learn the hard way😅

24mm f1,4 next?

@francoismasuabi

Ай бұрын

That would be something, then again would be very expensive that lens.

Why? Because the 1.8 is even better.

@francoismasuabi

7 күн бұрын

Yes, that is true. I have the 24-70s which does a brilliant job, so a 35mm with a much wider aperture will fit in nicely.

USD prices, * $700: Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD Lens for Nikon F * $600: Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 Lens * $700: Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S We should ask Tamron why the Nikon Z 35mm f/1.4 is so cheap.

@francoismasuabi

20 күн бұрын

You are not the first person to mention Tamron as the reason behind this. I have been trying to something that links the 2 but have come up empty. Any info to share so that I can look into this more?

@marcp.1752

15 күн бұрын

Your simple Milk-maid bill doesn't fit here. Nikon Z 35/1.4 - 11 lens elements into 9 groups, incl. 2 asph), Tamron 35 F1.4 SP - 14 elements in 10 groups, 3 aspherical, 4 LD (low dispersion), BBAR-G2 coating.

@UnconventionalReasoning

15 күн бұрын

@@francoismasuabi It was partly the agreement between Nikon and Tamron in 2022 where Tamron would not compete. It seems that having Tamron make the f/1.4 lenses fits that. The 17-28mm f/2.8, 28-75mm f/2.8, and 70-180mm f/2.8 lenses were made by Tamron. I think that has been widely acknowledged. I have also talked to Nikon and Tamron reps, basically together, and they acknowledged the f/2.8 zooms were made by Tamron. The Tamron rep also said that they made other lenses for Nikon.

@UnconventionalReasoning

15 күн бұрын

@@marcp.1752 Your simple mind seems unable to grasp the idea that Tamron might make a new lens for the Nikon badge.

@marcp.1752

15 күн бұрын

@@UnconventionalReasoning As long as you don't show a matching Tamron patent, its just hot air from your simple mind.

Why is it so cheap? It’s a Tamron. Great price.

@francoismasuabi

Ай бұрын

This is an interesting statement. Where can I read more about this?

@unique93obr

Ай бұрын

Tamron had the the best 35mm f1.4 lens for DSLRs, their 35mm was as good as Canon 35mm f1.4L II...if it's simmilar to that, it would be awesome...but I think it's simmilar optically to 40mm f2...which is still enough for lot's of people...we will see. :)

@Klausmausi

Ай бұрын

It is not a Tamron. Totally different construction and MTF charts.

@billmoyer3254

Ай бұрын

It is a Nikon design.