Very much needed comparison. Thx!

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

6 ай бұрын

Welcome and Thank you 😎 Don't forget to sub 😅

Thank you so much for this comparison. I really appreciate it!

Thanks for the update, waiting on delivery of z 180-600mm.👍

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

Best choice ever. 😁

Great video thank you for this!

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

6 ай бұрын

Thank you 😎 Don't forget to sub 😅

Just ordered it over the weekend. Should be here later this week

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

7 ай бұрын

Best luck! Surprised your getting it so fast.

Nice video. Thanks for the comparison. waiting on delivery of my lens... can't wait to get out and shoot.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

Best luck!

I can’t believe that this econo Z lens from NIKON performs so admirably and it’s internal zoom as well. It’s high on my list😄👍

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

I would probably put an order in as soon as you can. Who knows how long it's going to take. I'll probably have a video soon-ish about using this lens for "macro" work period specifically insects on flowers and bugs. The quotations are because it's not a real macro lens of course but it's certainly produces nice quality images and video.

Great video. I've seen a lot of people asking for a comparison between these 2 lenses.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

Thank you. If yih know anyone looking, send them over 😅

@JbombTheGreat

9 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective I certainly will!

Thank you for the very detailed and insightful video. Especially for the AF comparison. I am also a happy owner of the 180-600: I especially appreciate the internal focus/zoom and the acceptable weight for handheld photography. On a football field I have already had very positive experiences: I started (Z9) with f1:8, 1/1000, 800 ASA and ended with 1:6.3, 1/500, 40000 ASA (pitch lighting).

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

How did you get f/1.8?

@romanhar4151

9 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective f1:8 not f1:1.8

thanks a lot , nice review 👍

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

Welcome!

THank you for your excellent review/comparison of the new NIkkor Z 180-600 and the older Sigma. I too, was surprised at how "good" the Sigma was (not having had or used either of these lenses), though I look forward to getting the NIkkor for use with my Z8. One question please...Do you agree that the Wimberley P-30 lens foot plate be a good choice for the NIkkor 180-600? (I got it in advance of the lens, based on a recommendation from another photographer.) Thanks again!

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

Thank you, The stock lens foot on the Nikon is big enough for carrying. I don't use the lens foot on a tripod anymore though. I use a rail support system.

@stevetqp9152

8 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective OK, thank you!

Very good comparison. Thx

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

2 ай бұрын

Thank you

good review, thanks.. i saw the tripod you have... what setup is it.. i recently got the 150-600 sigma and i need something sturdy n stable for it... thankss.. i also thought of doing a DIY with my telescope motorized mount.. which will be crazy and could be controlled by a hand held controller

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

Thanks! The Fluid head is a Manfrotto 504X And all the rigging is from SmallRig. On my channel there's a review for the 504X and how to setup a telephoto lens support. Edit: I'll probably do a new rigging video for the 180-600, but the parts and setup is 98% the same. Just depends what camera body your using and if it had a battery grip.

Tx for test! Loved Nikon

Nice video. Does the Bird Eye AF work with the Sigma? Thanks!

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

Yes. The Nikon Z9 AF types and modes are not dependent on what lens is used. As long as the lens supports auto focus.

@victorbastos5859

9 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective Many thanks!

Thank you for the excellent video. I have considered the Nikon 180-600 to my Sigma 150-600. Before I ever bought the Sigma I knew it really shined out to 500 mm in sharpness. In fact it was sharper than the much heavier Sport version. I regret not buying the Nikon 200 to 500. My Sigma auto focus was tuned for optimal performance with the Sigma dock. That was more of an issue using it with my D750. I have used it with my Z6 MK2 with FTZ adapter. I sold that camera and not really tried it with my Z9. Smooth focus “grabs” matter to me more than super fast focus for my video work. I had the custom mode tuned for birding. I am going to re-watch the video to see if you have any corner sharpness tests done at 500. The Nikon 200-500 had focus issues when it was first released. I needed a long lens that worked so bought the Sigma at the time. I often carry my camera and lens protected by a plastic bag. Dust contamination is definitely a factor out in Arches when the wind is blowing. My issue is will I use the 180-600 enough to justify the purchase.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

6 ай бұрын

Hey thanks! If you plan on owning it for a long while, the internal zooming will be a huge plus no matter where your shooting. Even just keeping it in the car or home it will reduce the amount of dust pumped into it. Along with environmental factors like seasonal pollen.

@inspiredartphotos

6 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective actually I shoot a ton of video so better image stabilization in the Nikon lens is a huge motivation for me.

Interesting, the sharpness comparison seemed much closer than I expected given the Sigma reputation for soft images at 600mm on SLRs (my real-world experience confirms that). I've got a Sigma at the moment, a Z8 arriving next week, and one 180-600 on the way for wife's camera. I think I'll hold off committing to the second one for a while until I see what the Sigma/Z8 combination is like in the field. Thanks for the comparison.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

The area it differs is the corners. Center to center is close, but the Nikon is a smidge better. Sharpness outside of the center is nice for recomposition and cropping. No one really shoots their subjects dead center of the frame.

@Eikenhorst

8 ай бұрын

I agree, I obviously expected the new Nikon to be sharper, especially in the corners. But they held up pretty well on the Sigma. This is a very much a very zoomed in image to make the differences more clear, but in real terms I would not say corner sharpness is that different. To be fair, most sharpness issues with such a strong telezoom are typically less due to lens design and are more due to movement of the subject and or the lens. Especially for wildlife, test chart sharpness is just a theoretical concept. It is good to see no chromatic aberration on either lens. The question for me is not, is the new Nikon better in every way. The question is, is it worth double the price

@inspiredartphotos

6 ай бұрын

I bought the Sigma knowing that it performed really well out to 500mm. In fact better the Sport version. When I bought the Sigma, the Nikon 200-500 had just come out and was having focus issues. No regrets with the Sigma.

@andrzejniezgoda7060

4 ай бұрын

Co według Ciebie będzie lepsze. Nikon 180-600 i Z6 II czy sigma 150-600 C i Z8? Stoję przed wyborem i nie mogę się zdecydować 🤔

Thanks!

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

7 ай бұрын

Thank you Carlos! My first super😎

@CarlosGutierrez-cu4tu

7 ай бұрын

Well deserved! Great video, served me well. Also like you incorporate your yak. I do the same down in the Everglades

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

7 ай бұрын

@@CarlosGutierrez-cu4tu Oh man I'd looove to go through the Everglades. some day. So much more opportunities for wildlife.

Can i use my sigma 100-400mm 1:5-6.3 DG with nikon z6ii ? And if not is there adapter to that

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

If your lens is a F mount, you need a FTZ adapter for Z

Curious why you don't use sport's mode VR?

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

Because the subject was not moving erratically. And the Sigma doesn't have Sports VR. So it wouldn't be accurate comparison. The previous video from the Cleveland Airshow, the photo and video was all used with Sports VR.

Thanks for your vid... You made a tiny mistake in the excel file you published... The shortest length of the Sigma C+FTZ isn't 368 mm, but 290 mm (without lens hood). The longest length is not 460,5 mm but 370 mm. I just measured it. I think I'm going to conclude, I'm not selling my Sigma and buy the Nikon Z 180-600 (yet...) So your video is been helpful to make it a bit more clear for me... But I'm going to look for more. Regards from the Netherlands, Europe.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

For longest length, it's extended at 600mm with the hood. At the end of the video, it shows the lens being measured.

thx for the comparison would love to know about the ibis on photography... is the ibis available from the menu in photography with the sigma on the z9?

@scuba-people

4 ай бұрын

ps i know there is the evr in video.... it shows as unavailable on my z8 thank you

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

4 ай бұрын

Ibis is just the camera sensor being stabilized. It's on with every lens. Electronic VR is jerky and sucks. I wouldn't use it.

@scuba-people

4 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective it s also what i thought, i was lent a z9 on an assignment in nepal and yes it was the case but on my z8 the ibis option is not on anymore this is only the case with my sigma any of my nikon f mount are getting the ibis. I ge the feeling when i just got the z8 it was the case and with the firmware update its now not compatible with non nikon f lens..

@scuba-people

4 ай бұрын

ps to be clear i'm not talking about the electronic vr but the actual ibis setting in the cam menu

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

4 ай бұрын

@@scuba-people if your lens has a VR switch, it will turn on and off the lens VR and camera IBIS together. And the in camera VR options will be greyed out. Sadly, Nikon doesn't let you have VR on in lens and IBIS in camera controlled seperated. So turn your lens switch to VR On and ibis will continue to work.

Hi , can you compare sony etz21pro adapter and 200-600 on z9 ( with nikon 180 600) . Both lenses looks very similar and wondering how the sharpness , IBIS works for video recording on z9

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

I can't, sorry. The cost to buy or rent is to high just for a video. Everything on my channel is my own money and equipment. But hey if Sony and Megadapt wanted to sponsor a video I'd be all over it. Lol.

@wayanadanpixels

9 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective that's true 🙌

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

​​@@wayanadanpixelsjust going by weight, sealing, cost, minimum focus ect that can be seen in the chart 4:00 comparison there's really no reason for someone to buy a Sony lens when the Nikon finally exists now.

@wayanadanpixels

9 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective checking alternative for sony is because i am not 100% trusting nikon . because when i was buying z6 , a7iii was cheaper but focusing better than z6 . when i got z8 , 2 hardware issues reported by nikon 1 was already identified in z9 that is the lens mount issue and my preordered z8 was effected. Now nikon introduced 180 600, not able to trust 100% . its same price as sony but reviews show its less sharper compared to sony when 6.3 aperture but sharper for f8 . slower motors wondering will it be ok for video autofocus.. So that's the history i just checking sony when nikon is out

Welke arca swiss lens plate word hier gebruikt op de 180-600??

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

De plaat voor de Nikon of Sigma staat vermeld in de videobeschrijving. De Nikon heeft een 150mm Leophoto plaat.

It would be interesting to compare 180-600 with sigma 60-600 for SLR cameras. Still, additional focal lengths from 60-180 can be very useful. I wonder how they compare in terms of AF speed and image quality. In terms of stabilization, Sigma will definitely lose.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

5 ай бұрын

If they sent me one, I'd gladly do it.

I wonder how the newer software update affects focus for Nikon. IN April 2024 I tested a Z8 auto focus, and it was extremely sticky while in B&H. Internal focus is nice on this lens.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

Ай бұрын

I'm sure it didn't get worse. Lol

@ALIONFORYAHSWORD

Ай бұрын

@MannsWoodlandPerspective Yeah, no, I didn't think that it got worse either. As accurate as tracking was in B&H I would like to see you re-evaluate this lens with the better software updates.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

Ай бұрын

Reevaluate with which camera?

@ALIONFORYAHSWORD

Ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective with the same camera the Z9 I'm guessing would be perfect. The software is leap years ahead if the 1st issued firmware with the last update.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

Ай бұрын

@@ALIONFORYAHSWORD I've been on the newest Z9 firmware and it feels basically the same. There's not been a big difference between fw 4.1 and fw5.0

Nice Video ! If possible please compare Nikon Z 180 - 600mm vs Sony 200 - 600mm

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

Thanks! Unless Sony sends me a 200-600 or someone else does, I wouldn't be able to. All these are my own equipment.

@vikashs7102

9 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective Sure! But really a nice comparison video it was between Nikon and Sigma

@uchithahettiarachchi8304

8 ай бұрын

@@vikashs7102 kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZZWaztipipqxYNY.html

Was the AF on Sigma in the default or fast mode?

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

You mean the VR? It was on the first option.

@Bartek9957

9 ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective No, I meant the options that can be set via USB Dock - one of them makes the AF faster.

Just got this sigma for $750, nikon is superior but it’s out of stock and back ordered and i need the 400mm range for the solar Eclipse this coming april 8.. i might just sell the sigma together with my old gear’s, D500/D750..but for now i need it badly for the eclipse

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

2 ай бұрын

Best luck with the eclipse!

i wanna see the newer 60-600mm sigma compared to the z

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

4 ай бұрын

Send me a copy and your wish will be granted 😂

What's with that strap on the lens hood of the Sigma, the noise it makes is annoying as heck.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

It comes in the kit from Sigma. I liked using it to pull the cap off the lens in a rush so I didn't have to reach inside the hood.

Excellent video! How does the combo of Z7ii +180-600mm Z compare with D850+200-500mm in performance? What's your take on it?

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

Thank you, This was a Z9 + 180-600. But overall I'd consider the Z7ii pretty equal to the D850 setup for photo. Video isn't much of a comparison.

From your comparison I don't see the reason to "upgrade".

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

5 ай бұрын

Optically, it's a 15% improvement for the Nikon. But for the other things like internal zoom, sealing, native mount, lens program buttons, better stabilization, having Syncro VR+IBIS together, build quality ect it's a no brainer to upgrade.

5:50. You were using vehicle tracking while there was nothing resembling a vehicle anywhere to track. Everybody has to start somewhere. The video is informative otherwise though it is a no-brainer which lens is better. Keep at it!

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

Thanks Yeah it was a leftover setting from the airshow previous. But in those modes it will still focus on anything in the frame if it doesn't see a vehicle/animal/human ect to detect and track. In single point AF-C the AF near to far worked the same. Regardless of what AF type it was.

I’m not seeing much difference at all. Still stoked on my Sigma!

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

4 ай бұрын

Just for the quality of life updates the Z lens brings is worth it's Wright in gold.

No, you can't compare one with single AF and the other with wide-L AF

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

In person it was the same speed when racking near to far focus. Really doesn't change the outcome.

You made a HUGE mistake dude. 2.8 meters minimum focus is for the Sigma on the 600mm. Nikon is superior on minimum. Please be careful when you are making these comparisons.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

8 ай бұрын

What mistake did I make? The Sigmas minimum focus distance is the same at 150mm or 600mm. It doesn't change. In the video you can see the lens didn't even extend. The Nikon focuses closer at wide end, but at 600mm it increases a little bit. But it is still a lot closer 600 v 600 on the Nikon anyway. I don't understand your point?

@camilo8cheryl

2 ай бұрын

The “ Be careful” made me laugh😂 it’s a very deadly lens comparison and someone might get hurt✌️ so Be careful next time.

@ndenyer

Ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective I certainly didn't understand the minimum focus section - it was unclear which lens you were talking about at any point, and even the photos didn't help as it wasn't clear whether the titles related to the picture above/below or to the left/right.

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

Ай бұрын

@@ndenyer yeah I understand the confusion after the fact. But the Nikon was able to focus almost twice as close. Next time I'll add lines / arrows.

@ndenyer

Ай бұрын

@@MannsWoodlandPerspective brilliant - thanks

Nikon bodies are notorious for AF hunting and these tests simply reaffirms the issue. Nikkor lens are great but bodies suck

@MannsWoodlandPerspective

9 ай бұрын

What kinda thought is that 😂 I would not judged a near to far AF test as anything useful 😂 No one actually focuses from 4ft to infinity and back on any lineup in a serious manner at 600mm. When things actually mattered, my D500, or Z9 never hunt.