Muslims from other countries can not be given citizenship. Bharat is not an ashram for entire humanity. 90% muslims voted for Pakistan. So Ambedkar wanted complete evacuation of muslims from Bharat.

@VijayaLakshmi-ks9un

3 ай бұрын

Wah

@DeshuSalian

3 ай бұрын

Wow, it's master stroke On partition all muslims were ready to go, because of classes they remained. But it is peace now they can go

@bloodwargaming3662

3 ай бұрын

90% ? Source - trust my WhatsApp propoganda bro

@chadbahadur69

3 ай бұрын

​@@bloodwargaming3662it is well documented why don't you read andanamazi

@user-cv1yq8ty2l

3 ай бұрын

Why quoting ambedkar if you hate him

I completely agree with Sai Deepak that we in India have an obligation to the minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan who are being persecuted on religious grounds there.

@abhi1017

3 ай бұрын

What if hostile actor converts to Hindu and comes here under a false pretense and pose a national security threat.

@vs9324

3 ай бұрын

@@abhi1017 Unlikely if he has come before 2014. If the cut off date is opened for future refugees then surely that is possible. In fact, 100% that will happen. ISI can give false documents to show he is a Hindu. A system of interview should be incorporated (i'm not sure whether it is there now) to find out first hand whether he is genuinely the person he is claiming to be.

@sdutta8

3 ай бұрын

What about aethists in Bangladesh, who have been murdered for their non-faith, although being born Muslim? Should they not be given refuge too? What about Muslims like Tasleema Nasreen who are speaking out against the discrimination in their countries?

@aizen9057

3 ай бұрын

That's a genuine question ​@@abhi1017

@vs9324

3 ай бұрын

@@sdutta8 They can apply through the normal route. CAA is to fast track applications of persecuted minorities in these countries.

Sab me quality chahiye, but 4 biwi 40 bacche bhi chahiye🤣🤣🤣🤣

@manoharsai24

3 ай бұрын

Confirm jannati hai 😂😂😂

@the_.shahil

3 ай бұрын

Mujhe bohot hasi aata hai jab aise baat sunta hu. Muslim ka fertility rate 3 se v Kam hai. Aur polygamy hindu mai jyada hai. Muslim ke percentage thoda jyada hai lekin by population, Hindus me polygamy bohot jyada hai muslim k comparison mai

@mohammedabdullahkhan4264

3 ай бұрын

Yah bhot bada myth or ghalat fahmi janbuj kar phelayi jarahi hai anapadao ke liye...most of the Muslims have one wife only and 2 kids...chk sensex Muslim population decline Muslims ki abadi kum ho rahi hai India mai Hindus are 80% and Muslims are only 14% only.

@Sangita_hotty

3 ай бұрын

Tere kitne biwi hain bahar ......kya kissi ko pata nahi hain kya

@mohammedabdullahkhan4264

3 ай бұрын

@@Sangita_hotty abbe vo badwe sidhi baat samhj nhi ati na trku andhbhakt

“Good fences make good neighbors”

@lakshyavarshney9942

3 ай бұрын

That's horrible we can be more open too

@malamsingh1944

3 ай бұрын

​@@lakshyavarshney9942 buddy we ain't living in Satyug, it's kaliyug going on, ghor kalyug

@VeganSanatani

3 ай бұрын

No honey.. imagine your neighbour coming to your home, and eating the food you cooked for your children😂​@@lakshyavarshney9942

@bhnuc

3 ай бұрын

​@@lakshyavarshney9942kiddo should experience world around hin more. Till then these childish rants are bearable. 😊

@lakshyavarshney9942

3 ай бұрын

@@bhnuc no forced family is 50 percent problem wrt exploitation esp in india u r putting out opinions which are problematic # i won't comply our and American contexts are v different and which world ? Where hv u seen what hv u really witnessed ? Dubai ,china , Singapore etc aren't our models anyways money ,culture are no subsitutes for civil liberties

Excellently explained by Jai Sai Deepak. I watched the whole interview. JSD is really putting out historical and constitutional facts.

Mr Tanveer proving their loyality to their religion. How can all religions not treat equally ? -For caa How can all religions treat equally ? For ucc That is the hypocrisy of secular and peaceful community

26:53 victim card.

@Avant-garde1611

3 ай бұрын

Jsd had a comeback for that too😂❤

@arunsrinivasiyengar2759

3 ай бұрын

Hanuman ki fast chalraha hain 😊.

@rahulsolanki5014

3 ай бұрын

Exactly...

The moment Anas stopped talking about UCC, you realize in principle he doesn't care a damn about equal rights.

@lakshyavarshney9942

3 ай бұрын

Ucc in Indian context would not be same as the American etc context do u really want fairness ? We don't need Singapore ,china models or corporate resource control which they have put on us as they won't be able to uplift or get the poor at par , we don't need peer pressure or corporate exploitation as the Indian way

@lakshyavarshney9942

3 ай бұрын

What equal rights ? Turning into a corporate dictatorship or like Singapore ,china ?

@TheStylePallette

3 ай бұрын

I'm offended...Please dont say anything to Mr Anus...😂😂😂 He has a phd from g**nd marwao university...

@maysonrider2687

3 ай бұрын

Equal rights w.r.t. muslims ,they are privileged and here they ask muslims cant get advantage of CAA 😅 ​@@lakshyavarshney9942

@instaQuest21

3 ай бұрын

​@@lakshyavarshney9942don't behave like a kid. You need to be more educated.

Hypocrite Anas ki batti gul hogayi UCC Suntay he.

Even being at this position he didn't hesitate to play a victim card that I am on fasting so can't speak louder 😂

Sai Deepak's debate has depth, Scholarly, backed with historical evidences. Where as the other man's argument looks shallow. It is characteristic of any ordinary Muslim's argument though he is a Supreme Court Lawyer.

Victimhood started 😭😭😭

What a vast difference between 2 Supreme court advocate, 1 very clear. concise and to the point another trying to spin words and trying to confuse people and failing

@nagendrabhatnagar

3 ай бұрын

Why not be specific as to leave no one in doubt - Sai Deepak is clear, concise, precise, full of logic & surgical precision - Anas simply had no answers except for doing whataboutry.

@AwsomeRudy

3 ай бұрын

@@nagendrabhatnagar agreed

@Avant-garde1611

3 ай бұрын

​@@nagendrabhatnagaryeah,even their ways of talking, i mean the words Anas used i.e "launde", "Pakistan ki humne maar rkhi hai" these don't suit a SC's advocate

@umeshupadhyay...

3 ай бұрын

This discussion is for the highly educated ,intellectuals and all these are useless fellows when situation arises like 1990 .The force consisting of street fighters are supreme and no rafale,no mitary,no courts can contain them.The two years back example of 2020 of Shaheen Baug.Such discussions are only a timeless for these useless audience.

@abhijeetbhaskar5225

3 ай бұрын

@@umeshupadhyay... Bro Sai already said to provide your complete support to Bajrang dal types group. Cause they are the only ones who will help in those kinds of situations and teach kalaripayattu (Martial arts founded by Parshuram) to young Hindu for self protection .

I SALUTE YOU, SAI DEEPAK SIR.

UCC ke ate hi...Fatttttt gayi..😅

That other guy lost debate completely .He is crying from inside .

Anas has exposed himself by dillydallying on UCC while talking of equality.

@Avant-garde1611

3 ай бұрын

Yeah i mean they say they're fighting for a great cause,for country and their fellow people BUT whenever it comes to give a valid argument just look at their condition. Really can't even put their cause then what are they trying to fight for??

@lakshyavarshney9942

3 ай бұрын

I don't agree with ucc , corporatised and forced family system sucks Indian context is different from the American etc corporate resource control just so they can uplift the poor sucks ,that ,peer pressure and communism can't be the Indian way

@vs9324

3 ай бұрын

@@lakshyavarshney9942 Then why common criminal code? Why the Constitution? Let the individual decide how she / he wants to live? My dear, that is not how nations are run. The rational for UCC is that personal rights cannot be differentiated in a nation based on one's religion just like criminal law be differentiated on that basis.

@lakshyavarshney9942

3 ай бұрын

@@vs9324 constitution allows us critical freedoms and there must be no attempt to change it ,no giving up on freedoms money and culture are no substitutes for civil liberties and we can have a choice

@lakshyavarshney9942

3 ай бұрын

@@vs9324 ucc is not just about the religious angle many Hindus don't agree with it and I won't , #;no compliance

Anas debating with JSD felt like school CRICKET team competing with best IPL team. Best argument was yes we should move towards UCC but my fundamental rights prevent it so technically they never want UCC as privilege will be gone.

@TheStylePallette

3 ай бұрын

I'm offended...Please dont say anything to Mr Anus...😂😂😂 He has a phd from g**nd marwao university...

I too do not agree with RSS type of Hindutwa. Their narrative that everybody born in India is completely an illusion, since no non-Hindu would accept the he is also a Hindu because of being born in India. Yes! For an inclusive ideology, it is enough if we say everyone born in India(Bharat) is an Indian(Bhartiya)

Mr.Sai Deepak is a lawyer,he can say exactly what has to be told.he is expert in law language,and dharma also.Diversity comes from Hinduism itself.Hindu dharma allows everyone is free to live his own principles.but not by force and killings.

JSD Sir! Always interesting to listen to, "More power to you, stay blessed. Jai hind!"☘️🫡🙏

We should not see India based on any constitutional perspective because India was not born on 15 August 1947, she is over 10,000 years old the most ancient Hindu civilisation and she was on this planet when no other civilisation or country was there. So we must stop defining India on basis of what happened in 1947.

@rajashashankgutta4334

Ай бұрын

Bro we live in republic of India which was born on 15th August 1947.

Declare India as Hindu country as long as we have majority and finish the debate once and for all

@krishnavishwakarma1969

3 ай бұрын

True, and become xerox of communal पाकिस्तान and neighbours!!

@annoyedcat2602

3 ай бұрын

​@@krishnavishwakarma1969Hinduism is not islam . secularism in india exist because of Hindus are in majority

@krishnavishwakarma1969

3 ай бұрын

@annoyedcat2602 u need to check history before islam.. brahminism fighting with buddha and jain faith and lower caste tantricism... So, don't say it.. Brahmanical system is as destructive as islam in its previous practices also

@annoyedcat2602

3 ай бұрын

@@krishnavishwakarma1969 no that is not brahminism. Research about brahmans then come to debate. Caste discrimination was popularized only during late medical era. Buddha was never against brahmans but heceas against the malpractices occuring in the name of brahmans.

@annoyedcat2602

3 ай бұрын

@@krishnavishwakarma1969 no that is not brahminism. Research about brahmans then come to debate. Caste discrimination was popularized only during late medical era. Buddha was never against brahmans but heceas against the malpractices occuring in the name of brahmans

JSD Rocks as usual. But the question is how long are we going to resist? When will the glory age of Bharthiya civilization restart after this battle for reclaimation?

Look at the hypocrisy of adv Anas. When Bharat wants to accomodate few handful of hindus in Bharat as per legal CAA norms then he says this is encroachment of right to resources of bharat of bharatiya citizens, but for years endless Bangladeshi and Rohingya Muslims has been infiltrating and living illegally in Bharat, does NOT concern him as encroachment of right to resources of Bharat of Bharatiya citizens.

@Avant-garde1611

3 ай бұрын

Ironically those people fearing about resources who ideally should have left this country in the first place in 1947. Now dictating who should be allowed to come and live here!!

What Nonsense, "Is desh mein logon ke paas khane ko nahee hai, kyunki aap log dozen ke hisaab se bache paida karte hai". Your community is the main reason for population explosion and job crisis in our country. Instead of fighting CAA, for shortage of resources, control your community's population that is growing in Geometric Progression.

I type this, as an Indian Muslim who considers himself a Diplomat, and a Critic of his identities. Though I do not believe in the Idea that change in demography is going to make India oppressive towards others, but I do believe that My community can Indeed learn some things from Hindus, the Hindus that took me as their own, that let me attend Ganesh Puja with them, that gave me the Prasad and the Hindu Pandit, that gave me his blessings knowing that I am not of his community. I ask my brothers as a human to learn from such Hindus, and I ask them to not stoop so low as to insult others like those that spread hate.

@macherie300

3 ай бұрын

Please first start lecturing your muslims. Again it's typical of people always to expect Hindus to rise and keep bending to your needs by wraping it up with moral words.

@RedRebel008

3 ай бұрын

@@macherie300 When did I bring forth any expectations for Hindus????? I only expressed that any human may it be Hindu or Muslim should learn from the Hindus I was brought up by. I have met with Hindus who have said terrible things about my religion, and many that respected it, that's the reason I said HUMAN instead of Muslims (Even though Muslims are the ones who have to improve more. but as I said I am a Critic, my literal personality is based on criticizing Myself, My Family, My Religious Community, My National Community etc.)

@eternalthoughts-wu5lo

3 ай бұрын

@@RedRebel008 Only BJP/RSS MDCs can say good about the criminal desert cults...No person from those cults will ever be loyal to Bhaarat sorry ZEROtrust for saiooooos

Brilliant jsd, one question remained unanswered. Loyalty of hindus vs Muslims towards bharat

What a talk by Sai. Every time you talk, you excel your previous one. Fantastic.

Yes. Dharma is not the same as religion. The word religion comes from the latin word religare meaning to be bound (preferably by a book with some non existent transcendent god's commandements). Dharma is like the fulcrum of a seesaw. It upholds/sustains stability and harmony of the universe. Every entity in the cosmos has a dharmic role to play from an electron to human beings. Hindutva is nothing but an individual or organization or political party upholding personal, social and environmental dharma for stablility and haromony of the world. Any religion or person (regardless of birtrh) who violates dharma have to be dealt through (sam, dhan, bhed and dand) or (persuade, purchase, divide and create or exploit weakness and punish) depending on the context. This is Hindutva. Ahimsa does not mean nonviolence. It means least harm to a society through dharmic action by Hindutva forces against adharma. Dharmic Hindus are egoless and karma yogis (even if they kill for dharma they are not bound by law of karma or cause and effect - Bhagavad Gita Ch 18 vs 17).

@Achintyanath

3 ай бұрын

You yourself are quoting from the Bhagvad Gita and then you are saying that Dharma does not come from a book while religion comes from a book. First clear your own confusion about Dharma then write long comments.

@BeE_AriyaN

3 ай бұрын

​@@Achintyanath did he say Dharma only comes from Bhagavad Gita? First clear your thoughts

@BeE_AriyaN

3 ай бұрын

Ahimsa does mean non-violence, it just doesn't mean pacifism.

@Achintyanath

3 ай бұрын

@@BeE_AriyaNMy thoughts are very clear. You talk about yourself and the guy that you are defending

@ohm4500

3 ай бұрын

​@@Achintyanathso base level thinking and analysis

The blunder that was committed at the time of partition was that India was not declared as Hindustan, land of Hindus and not ordered not complete exchange of muslims and hindus from both the nations. Had that been done, there would not have been a necessity of caa today.

Hindus of Srilanka are not ill_treated or persecuted. And Muslims of Pakistan and Afghanistan are not Minorities and they chose to have a separate land by choice and on grounds that they cannot coexist with us. Why do these Muslims want to take everything to an international forum, so that it becomes an endless saga of talks like Kashmir. If we are powerful, we are powerful to take our own decision and decide whom we want to give citizenship. Let the muslims of Pakistan go to International forums and beg for citizenship in Bharat. Vaise bhi they are an International Epitome for begging and playing the victim card.

@nishobit.1293

3 ай бұрын

As a Sri Lankan, tamilian and Hindu I have to inform you that we are in fact second class citizens with non-equal rights. It is a milder form of ill-treatment. However, Bharat has no obligation towards us or our plight. But it has towards the plight of Hindus of the northern neighbouring countries. Sri Lanka has always been an independent country. Whatever happens on our land is our fate and our karma. But Pakistan, Bangladesh and parts of Afghanistan have been a part of Bharat. They were separated from it under the pretext of religious sovereignty. And as we can see all over the world Islamic counties find it hard to treat their religious minorities in a humane way. Bharat should do whatever it takes to protect them.

News 18, this is not fair, when you have a discussion/ talk on a particular topic and you invite guests with opposing point of views it makes it a good discussion, intellectually stimulating. Unfair bit is when you put one brilliant mind in this case Sai and a duffer opposing him it makes it very boring. Hopefully you'll keep that in mind in your future selection.

@rakeshpillai8564

3 ай бұрын

Who do you think can give Sai a hard time 😂😂 no one

@Avant-garde1611

3 ай бұрын

​@@rakeshpillai8564that's true💯

@ThunderingClouds

3 ай бұрын

@@rakeshpillai8564 Bring Rahul Gandhi he will definitely beat Sai Deepak in legal debate

@bhavikchheda6887

3 ай бұрын

​@ThunderingClouds 😂😂😂

@eternalthoughts-wu5lo

3 ай бұрын

I liked that adjective DUFFER bhraata

Stand with Sai Deepak.

Anas looked like a clown the moment he opened his mouth. JSD eats the likes of him for breakfast everyday 🔥

Who's that another joker... Seen him for the first time😂

@eternalthoughts-wu5lo

3 ай бұрын

like all jokers he is a saiboooooooooooooooo Paapad Mahaabads Anas

Man, you can't beat J.Sai in facts and articulation 🔥

India was partitioned very strangely where terrorists went to pakistan but their supporters like Owaisis, Anas, abdullahs etc remained in India.

Democracy western construct hai, Anas need to study about indian history, He just need to go back and study class 6, 7, 8,9. In book it is clearly mentioned that first gantantra country idea is in the vaishali. So it is clear that democracy is not western construct.

Anas is classic example VICTIM CARD 💳

Sai deepak rocks🚩🙏

Derailed discussion on Bharatiyata. J Sai Deepak wanted to stick with the Topic but the anchor is not capable enough. Excellent presentation by J Sai.

Doesn't anas sound like perpendicular from Gangs of Wasseypur?

@2007krishnan

3 ай бұрын

Yass😅

@bhavikchheda6887

3 ай бұрын

😂😂

Very good sai we are with you till end thanks for awakening soul of mother india indeed is mother of us all

Yesss, debate and the society both very much live, its an outspoken fearless India to the world. Inspiring and to be proud of.🙏

Why Sonam Wangchuk ‘s demands for #Ladakh are currently #NotFeasible, in the current geopolitical scenario :- 1.Union Territory status of #Ladakh should not be removed as there is a border stand-off along the #LAC, with the Indian Army and PLA unable to resolve the crisis. As long as the border crisis exists, Ladakh needs to be a UT 2.6th Schedule of the constitution on #Ladakh will hamper #Infrastructure development along the #LAC that is required for the quick deployment of armed forces, Especially, when the #Chinese are developing their #Border infrastructure In surprising speed 3.The period before #Article370 when Ladakh was under the whims of the #Abdullah's and the #Mufti's would have been a perfect time to begin these protests. Especially when there was no border crisis along the LAC. why start now? 4.If he wanted to only fight for #Ladakh, why show such an attitude & provide such crude examples of Hindu duties, Ram and Sita? He could have come up with a better example. "They turned out to be such a Ram that they rescued Sita from Ravana & sold her in an open market instead of taking her home."- Sonam Wangchuk 5.There are also ‘claims’ that Sonam Wangchuk was spreading separatism among the youth, and acting as an enabler for various separatist movements across the region.

@eternalthoughts-wu5lo

3 ай бұрын

URR8 bro

JSD is intellectual, he will roast anyone. Need more youngsters of this stature. Don't make Anas kind of goat head to sit beside intellectual.

@eternalthoughts-wu5lo

3 ай бұрын

PIGheaded will be better adjective for that porkeeeeey

Anas Bhai Khud CAA ka topic ghusate ho, phir UCC puchane se se itna taklif kyun

17:22 👏👏👏🫡🫡🫡 At least some has the courage to speak out these words.

If the supreme court has this kinds of Anti Hindu and Anti Nationalist advocates then it really shameful and a serious matter of concern for the sovereignty and security of the country.

If secularism means equal treatment of all religions why different laws for different religions like AIMPLB special property rights to that Muslim community organisation like waqf board

@eternalthoughts-wu5lo

3 ай бұрын

Just as Simple as that

Hoping that cji dont become heartless to million hindus facing persecution.

@miteshshah5384

3 ай бұрын

CJI is very left inclined.

This country has got divided on the basis of religion only...CAA has given a platform to those minorities who persecuted in those countries whome we had connection. Otherwise every one has the scope to apply for citizenship.

AMAZING EXPLAINATION.

JSD is a fearless gem!!! The country has been divided based on Religion. The 2nd largest majority of Bharat despite wrongfully remaining since clean exchange of people didn't happen, always plays a victim card despite growth in their numbers. We are only obligated for the Minorities from the Muslim majority countries.

*Don't be Casteist Fundamentalist Bigoted "Mazhabi Sanatani." Be "Mukt Hindu" Free from Scriptural Fundamentalism.* There're two versions of Hinduism. One, that's Hinduism, the Religion that's way of Faith. Another is Hinduism, the Dharma which's not Religion, which's not bound by any Scripture or Shankaracharya or Faith, not even by the idea of Super-Natural. I follow that Hinduism of Seeking which's unbound, and Dharma which has no necessary relations with any Scripture, not even the necessary idea of Gods or Super-Natural. That version of the Hinduism is the real Secularism. Secularism comes from Hinduism, the way of Seeking, Seeking the Truth and Conscience. And the ONLY Truth is Science. Secularism comes from Hinduism. And Secularism is the real Hinduism. And the Hinduism of Seeking, has been fighting with the Hinduism of Religious Faith, forever. It's these two versions of Hinduism, that curves the Bharatvarsha. And for the sake of Hinduism the way of Seeking, I must fight Hinduism the Religious Faith, and Clerics and Shankaracharyas and Scriptural Fundamentalism, superstitions. You don't understand, Secularism comes from Hinduism. And Secularism IS the real Hinduism. And if you want the real Hinduism the way of Seeking, then you must fight Hinduism the Religious Faith, along with ALL the religious faiths around the world. Hinduism the way of Seeking is the bedrock of the Bharatvarsha. And we really call that version of Hinduism as Secularism, only. When you're fighting with real Secularism, you're actually fighting with the actual Hinduism. For the sake of Hindu "Dharma", that's Secularism, we must fight Hindu ReligionS along with evil Abrahamic Religions as well. Secular Hindus are the real Hindus. Anti-Secular Hindus are the real enemy of the Hindus. But, we don't need Pseudo-secularism, that's for sure. We must eradicate Islam, the Religion of Terror, first and foremost. We must stop Conversions of Hindus, if we want India to remain Bharatvarsha. We must stop Missionaries and Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Rackets. But without Secularism, India will go down in hell. Secularism is the real Hinduism. For the sake of real Hinduism, Secularism, we shall be prepared to fight even the Hinduism the Religious Faith. *Denounce the "infallibility" of ALL Scriptures, necessarily including Quran and Bible, and GuruGranth, Tripitak, Smritis, and everything else, and be real Secular.* *Liberalism : "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls off." -Carl Sagan* *Even those who believe in GodS are just fine, but those who believe in Books are Dangerous.* *Speak up about Islam. If Liberals addressed Religion of Terror then this day wouldn't had come. Follow Ex-Muslim movement.* *There's no "First Human" in the path of Evolution, ever.* *No Adam, no Noah, no Manu ever existed.* *All Creation stories are false.* *All Religions are false. All Prophets are Frauds.* *All Book bound Religions are false. All books have been disproved by Science.* *Science is the ONLY Truth we Know.* *Follow only Science and Humanism.* *Forget all religious teachings. They're false, all of them.* *"It's called Faith cause it's not Knowledge."* *-Christopher Hitchens* *"There's ONLY one World. The Natural World. And no Super-Natural."* *-Sean Carroll, Poetic Naturalism* *Stay away from Naxal Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Racket. **#BandeMataram*

@Kaal3339

3 ай бұрын

🙏🙏

@darkprince2490

3 ай бұрын

lol secularism casteism both come from europe.

@prasanna3378

3 ай бұрын

@@darkprince2490 Don't pretend like nothing happened, you hypocrite. Only real "Sanatani" is "Param-Prakriti." Hell with "Mazhabi Sanatani" Smriti-vadi Fundamentalists. Hell with bigoted Shankaracharya. Regardless of astik or nastik or jati, varna, We are Dharmik Hindus, not "Mazhabi Sanatani."

@prasanna3378

3 ай бұрын

​@@darkprince2490Secularism is Bharatiya idea. And regardless, Secularism is an international idea, and whether it's Bharatiya or not, we'll crush every single last idian ideologies that stand against Secularism. Secularism is an international ideology, take religion out from society. Science doesn't come from Vedas. Vedas themselves came from Pre-Science. "Religion is Failed Science." -Sam Harris Modern Science essentially originated outside the territories of India, despite the urge to know the Scientific Truth always being present in India. Our Dharma wanted Truth and Truth only. Our Dharma placed Truth above GodS or Brahm. Truth is ultimate, and Science is the ONLY Truth. And despite Vedas being Pre-Science, modern Science essentially originated in Europe. BUT, Science is UNIVERSAL Truth and Secularism is international ideology of putting Science over Religious Faith. If we have native Bharatiya Faith that constitutes our very core, yet that faith is unscientific, we'll not hesitate destroying that very supposed core which's based on unscientific lie. If Bharatiyata is supposed to mean only unscientific faith superstitions and bigotry, we'll not hesitate crushing every shread of bigoted Bharatiyata. Science is greater than Hindu or Sikh Religion, Truth is greater than God, and Humanism is greater than Bharatiyata. If there's any Bharatiya Nationalism to exist, it has to comply with Secularism and Humanism, or get erased from the face of the earth. Charvak is my Hinduism, Secularism and Humanism is my Dharma, Liberalism is my only Nationalism. #BharatTirtha of Manav-Dharma professed by Gurudev Robindronath Thakur is the only Acceptable Bharatvarsha. Anti-Seculars and Anti-Liberals are real Anti-Nationals. *Denounce the "infallibility" of ALL Scriptures, necessarily including Quran and Bible, and GuruGranth, Tripitak, Smritis, and everything else, and be real Secular.* *Liberalism : "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls off." -Carl Sagan* *Even those who believe in GodS are just fine, but those who believe in Books are Dangerous.* *Speak up about Islam. If Liberals addressed Religion of Terror then this day wouldn't had come. Follow Ex-Muslim movement.* *There's no "First Human" in the path of Evolution, ever.* *No Adam, no Noah, no Manu ever existed.* *All Creation stories are false.* *All Religions are false. All Prophets are Frauds.* *All Book bound Religions are false. All books have been disproved by Science.* *Science is the ONLY Truth we Know.* *Follow only Science and Humanism.* *Forget all religious teachings. They're false, all of them.* *"It's called Faith cause it's not Knowledge."* *-Christopher Hitchens* *"There's ONLY one World. The Natural World. And no Super-Natural."* *-Sean Carroll, Poetic Naturalism* *Stay away from Naxal Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Racket. **#BandeMataram* *These poor people, who are so fond of religion, they don't understand that it's the religion, the very religion they're defending, it's that religion that kills people.* *All Humanists are friends of all humanists. Sanatani, Sikh, Christian, Musalman these all are hoax. All these religions and religious identities are fabricated. Find the human in you, and in the other person, even if it's Kaffir or Musalman.* *Leave Religion, accept Humanism. Don't be a Musalman, be a Human.*

@eternalthoughts-wu5lo

3 ай бұрын

this piece of sihhht comes directly from paapad mahaabads Anas

anas k anus fat gayi hai

Superb J Sai...too good..keep it up..

India, that is Bharat, has the burden of bringing back all minorities because Pakistan was earmarked for “muslims”. If that is the partition, why is India under the burden of bringing in Muslims in India? We were secular then, and that’s why about 20-30cr Muslims live in India. About as much in Pakistan. The problem today is how minorities in Pakistan are being treated. The problem isn’t why 20-30cr muslims in India are living happily, sometimes aggressively.

If the news anchor wouldn’t have been there .. Sai would have probably gobbled up that Al Taqiya Rep 😂

J Sai is rock

1. The basic issue is Hinduism is a different from exclusivist, supremist nature of Abrahamic religions. Therefore, for a country like India with majority subscribing to Hinduism with 35% to 40% being other believers, defining Bhartiya and Bharityata is going to be problematic. But now that we have a Constitution with which no one broadly has much issues ( except for amendments during Emergency times!), we should not bother to raise this question at all but let every one follow the Constitution and the rule of law. However, this is so as long as population structure remains as mentioned above but as soon as it changes to Hindus even becoming below 50%, the Constitution itself may be abrogated in favor of something else!! 2. So rather than trying to answer such divisive questions, we should focus on something more drastic - have a vote share in proportion to the religious structure of the population to preserve and protect the Constitution as as was originally enacted in 1950- that is remove the word secular and socialist from its preamble. 3. We need a clear definition of minority in its various dimensions. 4. We need to remove control over Hindu Temples or have control over all religious institutions. UCC is of course taken as given. After this is done, we focus on our citizenship and call ourselves Bhartiyas or Indians. And religion goes into the private sphere. 5. More importantly, Hinduism must develop a process for conversion from other faiths to Hinduism to have a level playing field. Otherwise, Hindus get converted to other faiths but converse is not possible today, due ot the peculiar nature of Hinduism. This needs to be corrected urgently.

This guy is master in language

Thank you Saideepak bro itwas very insightful

the brown mark on Anas's forehead shows how i should receive his statements.

J sai Deepak is a gem ❤

Sai makes sense

30:48 no dhruv rathee was harmed😂😂

Sai deepak always speaks perfectly no one can argue

Sai Deepak is Genius ❤❤

Sir deepak you are inspiring.

100℅ agreed with J Sai Deepak😊

It is truth!

Love you J Sai deepak ❤

What a fraud that Tanveer is

Sir, the gentleman on the right, your fundamental right is available in Middle East, please move there and wish you good time.

JSD is always to the point & precise.The other guy's arguments lacked material. JSD outsmarted him hands down 🙌

Good debate

A debate is not a game of ping pong - if you can’t answer the question asked, answer with a question you think will floor your opponent.

Sai dipak very clever.hats off to you.respect for Sai dipak.

Fast chal raha hai Bhai specialist in playing victim card.

Yesa usne bola hi nai kahi pe 🫠

JSD is invincible in every debate. 🔥

Liked it because of JSD

Any language is capable of conveying meaning of a word if the word is properly defined.

I gave sai deepak a paper for his speech... Paper silently slid away to the dustbin. .. Now i know why. 😅

"Secularism" Please make a video on the real intent behind including this word to our Constitution. What are its political ideological, cultural repercussions on the nation. How much destruction did it cause to the interests of 90% of the population in this country. How much time, money, efforts, resources are spent only in the name of "Secularism"...

The only definition of a Hindu is given by VD Savarkar❤

He says you dont give me time.. when he gets time, he says you didnt ask a question😂😂 what a cartoon!

Bhai ki le li Sai ne to.

Sai Thank you 😊

J the Boss , Limitless

20:19 bro u r the one who started talking about CAA and religion and now u r accusing him for that😂😂😂

Concepts of omniscient infiniteness is purely sanatan Hinduism and it's very clear scientifically that there can't be many infinite. Only one manfest in many shapes and forms. All others culture and religion believe in selectivity and boundaries. After invasions and colonization Bharat culture was totally sidelined and promoted their culture and intrests.. Unity in diversity doesn't include, pests, weeds, diseases cancers and trouble maker's.

We should not enhance enmity and hatred with our neighbours, that's not how peace and goodwill can be attained.. hate politics not progressive

@abhijeetbhaskar5225

3 ай бұрын

So, what you are saying is that let them cut head of our soldiers and take them back aur we keep our mouth shut. Guess what this already happened in Congress era. Now we can't even imagine this could happen. We don't need spineless govt when it comes to geo politics. You are a Waste of a citizen

What is his def though ? Replacing Pakistan and Bangladesh in sending cheap labour to the gulf?

Sri Tanwir wasvtge one who referred to CAA first and later commented that the debate has moved from Dharma and ended with muslims????

I’m glad anas exposed his eternal commitment to jihad. Dharmic values means nothing to him until islam has a ground to carry on the fight against non believers. Sad part is that, all this is being done by exploiting the full freedom that the constitution gives them. Sick.

Sai Deepak sir 🙌🙏

Harami kahika bol n UCC will implement in whole Bharat ,if CAA me sab ko include karna he to aek hi law hoga sabke liye, ye bol na... CAA is needed and I do support it ...