Some quick notes on the missile modes: - In elevated mode, you should keep the reticle on the target and not worry, as the missile will descend to the correct spot automatically when it gets near the target. (Of course, this requires that you lase the target before firing so it knows when to do this.) - Emergency mode requires a range under 1000, so it didn't actually trigger in this clip.

@PhanPhantasy

Ай бұрын

Ah, so set the range to 900 meters instead of just 1000?

@ActionScripter

Ай бұрын

@@PhanPhantasy I recommend setting it to zero with Ctrl+PgDown

@ActionScripter

Ай бұрын

@@PhanPhantasy I would say set it to zero using the range reset keybind

@PhanPhantasy

Ай бұрын

@@ActionScripter I see! Good clarification!

my main gripe with the game currently is the AI's behaviour either inhumane reaction times and dead on accuracy through bushes and most importantly through gun smoke and also through smoke screen to sometimes taking up to 30 seconds to notice you when you're sitting in front of them I hope they can fix these issues some day

@Tamburello_1994

Ай бұрын

I don't think that's a dev priority atm -- as I'm sure they are aware of the game's flaws. Right now, it's all about building the framework.

@jmgonzales7701

17 күн бұрын

i want a game as immersive as this but with infantry as well.

I really wish we could get some focus on the campaign next. GHPC has a lot going for it right now but we just need reasons to keep playing.

@Tamburello_1994

Ай бұрын

You're getting this much out of a HALF-BAKED game -- imagine the fun you'll have when it's actually COMPLETED.

@peqnut

28 күн бұрын

@@Tamburello_1994 yeah the fun you will have in 2030

@Dom-um6gi

28 күн бұрын

Yeah it feels like I only get like half an hour of gameplay a month with the new scenarios :/ Most of the fun and enjoyment I get is from the Dev streams talking about the development work itself lol 😅

@FuturPaladin489

28 күн бұрын

roadmap

@benjaminburns4412

27 күн бұрын

I lost my faith in that tbh i think we need our own mission editor. The missions the devs put out are far to simple

let me know your thoughts on this May Update!! 😀 (also close to 9K, subscribe if you haven't already let's go!)

@ilyas6566

Ай бұрын

Best update so far you can realy see the progress they making now

Good stuff. This developer is working hard.

Definitely time for some more NATO vehicles. I’m really looking forward to having infantry added to give the BMPs and Bradley’s more of a role; as well as artillery

Thanks for the update! This game keeps improving at a good steady rate very cool!

I really hope they add other NATO tanks in as-well in the future. Mostly leo's tho 😅

@Rimasta1

Ай бұрын

Would be cool to get the BAOR (British Army of the Rhine) and get the Chieftain and Challenger 1.

@_XKX_

Ай бұрын

leopard 2a4 is 100% coming to the game 2a5 isnt tho

@majorduckboi

Ай бұрын

​@@Rimasta1if I am not mistaking French and British are not coming to Fulda 1985 Scenario but they said they might come to other planned scenarios

@islamicstateofukraine

Ай бұрын

@@_XKX_ not 2a4 it wasnt introduced at that time in 1985, the newest one available was the 2a3 or earlier version like the 2a2, 2a1 etc

@barbarapitenthusiast7103

Ай бұрын

​@@_XKX_ no leo2a4s coming. They are a 1985 introduction, we wont get them the same way we arent geting kontakt 1

I love me some 1:19 "Kurwa" guided Missiles XD

Thanks for the heads up

We need this game in COOP/multiplayer.

@Tamburello_1994

Ай бұрын

we need the game to be finished.

@PhanPhantasy

Ай бұрын

@Tamburello_1994 the amount of comments i've seen about how "this game needs coop/mp" is too many. 😂

@Tamburello_1994

Ай бұрын

Which is hilarious because 1) these simpletons can't read (roadmap) or 2) just plain ignorant -- or a combination of the two. They'd get it -- then be on to crying about other aspects of an unfinished game.

Man I been waiting for the MCLOS to be implemented. Finally it’s realistic for the early missile

Love the camo netting❤

Need the troops bad!

@PhanPhantasy

Ай бұрын

Soon!

@jmgonzales7701

17 күн бұрын

i want a game as immersive as this but with infantry as well.

@jmgonzales7701

17 күн бұрын

​@@PhanPhantasy i want a game as immersive as this but with infantry as well.

Just noticed crew ruck sacks on the M1 update.

yes

Wonder if we are going to see any different variants of the T series tanks for that time period. Would love to see the 64bv as it entered service in 85’.

@MrChainsawAardvark

Ай бұрын

They seem to have a standard that it needs to be in service, not merely introduced or testing around 1985. They also want specific to this region of Germany, so you're not going to see Naval infantry with upgraded T-55s or domestic variants from Warsaw Pact States further south like Romania. Though I know some modders have been able to introduce reactive armor boxes.

@crusader_wolf1104

Ай бұрын

They were introduced in 85’ but realistically wouldn’t have been in the Fulda Gap yet

I'm waiting for Leopard 2 PzBtl 123 (4) to appear in the game.

this on console would rock

still waiting for coop ;)

I do not understand English. How do you apply camouflage?

@robingrewal8103

Ай бұрын

It's randomly selected like the luggage on all the vehicles There's is no way to pick it right know And I don't see that changing at least for know

@PhanPhantasy

Ай бұрын

Can't pick camo netting, it is random.

@NI-fe4mv

29 күн бұрын

I understood. Thank you！

I stopped playing GHPC primarily because 3 missions in a row some of my tanks flipped. You are lucky if it doesnt happen often to you.

@FujiLeeTheAmerican

Ай бұрын

Happens probably because your tracks collide with certain objects

@Neukend

Ай бұрын

@@FujiLeeTheAmerican a tank under my control flipped only once, all the other times that were bots, wich is even more frustrating

@Tamburello_1994

Ай бұрын

@@Neukend I guess you as well missed the "work in progress" disclaimer. Early access means no expectations.

@Neukend

Ай бұрын

@@Tamburello_1994 when a game is in early access that means you get a game with limited content. Not a simulator of a loading screen. I swear to god, with the amounts the game crashed or had me to go to the main menu this is literally what I got. Mind you, I did not write about the lack of content, the poor optimization, dumb AI for both sides and other gripes i have with the game. I am completely fine with games in ea, but. But when the fucking movement in the game behaves like this, well, then i may not have any expectations indeed, for the final release that is. PS. It's not like i didn't like the game or hating on the developer (I believe its a single person?). It was very much enjoyable for most of the time. But c'mon, when the thing that you are coding first when starting a game project fails so miserably, that you just can't leave behind.

@crusader_wolf1104

Ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@@Neukend The game is made by a a couple of people, but honestly I haven’t had any serious issues, and as someone said already it’s an EA game, broken stuff is to be expected. Had some optimization issues but some of the latest updates smoothed them out, loading times aren’t the best either but it is what it is. Seems like you’re a bit unlucky with the tank flipping thing, never had that happen out of the 180 hours I’ve played so far

This game needs coop and multiplayer PvP and it will be fire.

@bluntcabbage6042

28 күн бұрын

They are explicitly avoiding all PvP for the forseeable future and for good reason. GHPC PvP would be bargain bin War Thunder and it'd be a total shitshow, PvP is both insanely hard to balance and breeds toxicity more often than not, so it's safer for a passion project like this to stick to PvE. Plus PvE allows for more engaging scenarios that are simultaneously more realistic, which is half the selling point of the game.

@RealOny

26 күн бұрын

@@bluntcabbage6042 It could be managed by the community and not the devs themselves. GHPC devs would just have to release the tools to hosts the servers and what not but, I think the game is pretty balanced all things considered. The T-64B and T-80B can stand their ground against the Abrams, and soon we are gonna have West Germany in the game, so it's incredible exciting. War Thunder is in such a sorry state that I stopped playing altogether, this game it's miles ahead of WT already.

@bluntcabbage6042

26 күн бұрын

@@RealOny The money and man hours to just set up the servers and infrastructure - let alone managing it, which they absolutely _would_ have to do because they are the ones paying to run the multiplayer and community management would likely suck ass - would take away resources from the much more important PvE work they're doing. War Thunder is in a sorry state, absolutely. And it's a recurring theme that PvP tank games will inevitably also be in a sorry state with enough time. Going PvP is just a massive headache that carries _far_ more risk than any benefit it could render. We already have PvP tank games, even if War Thunder is deeply flawed, while we have few to no proper tank PvE games. One niche needs more attention than the other by a long shot. And like I said, dedicating to PvE enables a lot more interesting scenarios that would be both more fun and more realistic, whereas PvP tank games always have to make stupidly unrealistic compromises just to make the PvP playable. Properly asymmetric scenarios, for example, almost always fall flat on their face in PvP but can thrive in PvE as well as any kind of massive simulated operations with many moving parts, it tends to be far easier in a PvE setting.

I only want terrain destruction and co-op... 🥺

@islamicstateofukraine

Ай бұрын

not everything revolves about co-op ok?

@AndiKoehn

Ай бұрын

@@islamicstateofukraine yeah ok, and how about just accepting a different opinion than yours, ok?

@quan-uo5ws

Ай бұрын

i just want infantry to be added, so missions are much more realistic (and interesting)

@matthewjones39

Ай бұрын

@@islamicstateofukraineCo-op is on the roadmap lol

@islamicstateofukraine

Ай бұрын

@@matthewjones39 its better for them to finish it fully, then add co op, id rather have the BDR added and other features like infantry.

Is this a multiplayer game? free to play ?

@PhanPhantasy

Ай бұрын

No Multiplayer/co-op yet. And no, this is not free to play.

Still no Bundeswehr ? NO THANKS

@PhanPhantasy

22 күн бұрын

Dude chill. It's coming.

Really sad that this game is becoming another pact masturbatory fest like war thunder. 3BM32 wasn't even issued until 1987.

@PhanPhantasy

29 күн бұрын

Absolutely not. The M1IP can still knock out those newer Soviet tanks, but I guess this game can't satisfy everyone and your comment won't be the first or last, even before the introduction to the Soviet Forces, it was called US biased/NATO. Whatever man. 🙄

@Tamburello_1994

28 күн бұрын

Citation needed please. 3VBM13/3BM32/33 (3BM32 "Vant") Entered service in 1985.

Ay lets gooo

Are you not a native English speaker? You mispronounced Joust and Cobra just within the first 2 minutes as well as your overall speech sounding very mouth closed and not natural considering you have a written script (also obvious in speech patterns). Maybe you should wing it a bit more to come off natural more and take some time on harder words if you aren't familiar with them.