I did a spit-take on your "my condolences" remark regarding the seating accommodations for the "high density" cabin. Laughed out loud. Thanks for that, Emmanuel.

Hi Emi,as always a very professional, clear and concise video as you always do.

Thank you for all of your fantastic videos.

It may seem simple at first glance, but once you try it, everyone will truly understand your capabilities. 💪😀

Walking over the seats is a pretty realistic simulation of an E190 cabin 😂

@maximiliangeiss7078

6 ай бұрын

And that's all we gotta care about right?

Just a quick note I have heard that only the outside models of the E170/E175 were imported. The outside models of the E190/E195 was made by FSS from scratch but I’m not entirely sure wether that’s true or not.

Can u share the takeoff sequence, TOGA setup on the ground but after rotating what u click to make the AP follow the climb and route? Thanks

Another great video Amano, thank you. I bought the EJ EJETS 170/175 aafter your last video, so about three weeks ago. I enjoyed two flights, but for some reason I have to uninstall and then reinstall the EJET’s before I fly them again. The team at FSS support don’t seem to be able to give me a resolution. Would love to buy these 190/195’s but don’t want to waste another £30 on an aircraft that I can’t even load without uninstalling and reinstalling. Every time I reboot the sim. If any of your fantastic viewers, have any idea what the problem is, I would love to hear from them. This seems such a fantastic little aircraft. I would love to be able to fly it just like all of my other payware aircraft in MSFS

Hi, had the same issue with the aft cargo door. I found a solution for me. Just go in GSX to airplane settings. At the aft cargo door select “door with no open/close checks”. I assume GSX does not recognise this door even if it’s open. You just need to remember to open and close this door manually. 😅😂

The models of the plane are great, my only problem is I see the change log for this plane every couple of weeks, and I don’t understand why getting Vnav, directs, etc… Is not there number 1 priority. This plane is a VNave away from being really decent. Right note it’s mediocre at best. Like I said though, model is pretty well done and I really want these to become good.

@A330Driver

6 ай бұрын

Probably they want to get their custom navigation system working first. I could understand why they don't want to invest time into a default direct to system if they replace that a while later with their own one. Similarly they probably don't want to program VNAV for the default system. But I agree, they should invest more resources into getting that custom FMS done.

@lt_dreams96

6 ай бұрын

I believe they are. VNAV and custom FMS are non walk in the park. They had had choices: halt all core updates while building custom fms for another whole year or give existing customers something to scratch their embraer itch while they do. I'm holding off on purchase until they get their custom fms up and running. Ill be watching from the sideline.

@50:54 ... great content, though I have a question, bare in mind I'm a noob and slowly learning more as I go, but as for the time stamp, what do you mean by this? being able to fly direct and using VAT-SIM? is that because VAT-SIM gives you callouts midflight, from where you must enter a "direct to" route? or if I'm wrong, could you elaborate? I don't use VAT-SIM yet, but to plan on getting it

Hey, what mod is that for walking model? I couldn't make anything work for it. Great review btw! :)

So you were changing the speed bug by touch screen on the PFD or what? Is that a real life feature also?

Is there any tutorial to configure the throttle quadrant with the efb?

Any idea why I can’t turn the APU off inflight?

Thanks for the video! Excellent as usual. What is announcement sound at @35:00? I can't quite make it out. Cabin crew? Also the HUD FPV has had too many espressos! (@44:08) 😂

@mariuszkalinowski2879

6 ай бұрын

From GSX - unlocking gear.

What I do: save my money for the MD11😍, and this when it´s developed further.Nevertheless it seems promising as it already has some nice features like the tablet.

Flew Air Dolomiti from Munich to Florence on an E195 and actually quite surprised how nice it was. I'd never heard of them before booking that flight

Great video once more !! I wonder however how you walk around so smoothly and especially : how do you climb stairs ?

@jayrermars8493

16 күн бұрын

Drone camera I guess

I have to buy this plane. Still learning the ATR-72-600 I bought.

is this a sound mod or the normal fss sounds?

Nice aircraft

Is this the 190-195 thats is on the xbox marketplace????

Exactly. Vnav and Autoland is the best part of this RW aircraft.

I have the 170/175 but have yet to even fly them. Lol. Im working on the atr 42/72 at the moment, and the crj is next. Probably wont be studying the e-jets until February or so. So many planes. Lol

@jay-rus4437

5 ай бұрын

Think Im actually on schedule. I posted the e-jet around February, and that is probably right. Did some CRJ flying, along with my typical a320 flying.

When u check doors it also includes cockpit door which was open.

@worlds_okayest_pilot_421

4 ай бұрын

Nobody cares. How about you worry about "checking" your grammar before you tell others what to do.

Im not interested in the 170/175 as im more into European ops so when this it's at a good level im going to buy the 190/195.

Not on Vatsim?

Not only the model, but lot's looks like the xcrafts one

hey there Emi, great video! Also, how do you roughly calculate a TOD and what does CAVOK mean? The textures on that aircraft indeed do look good though!

@A330Driver

5 ай бұрын

Hi, thank you very much. As for the T/D: Cruise level, divided by 1000 multiplied by 3 is the base formular. So let's say if we're in 37.000ft we take 37x3 and end up with 111NM as base. Now we got to take wind and speed into account. Let's say we got 50kt of headwind and plan the descent at 300kt. Per 10kt of headwind you substract 1NM, per 10kt of tailwind you add 1NM. Likewise per 10kt of speed above 200KT IAS you will add 1NM. So in our example we subscract 5NM for the headwind and then add 10NM for the 300kt descent speed. So that now gives us 111NM minus 5 plus 10, so we end up with 116NM for our descent. CAVOK means ceiling and visibility okay. So a cloud base no lower than 5000ft above the field (or MSA, whichever is higher), visibility more than 5km and no significant weather phenomena (such as fog, thunderstorms, windshear, etc.).

@NanookOblivion

4 ай бұрын

Thanks very much! (Sorry for the late reply though, had many emails that made it impossible to see your reply)

To manually turn on ice you need to turn the mode switch on. The buttons are Off or Auto. All valves should open, it's reported. You can preselect course by bringing up your preview needles and using course knob

Fly the Binter Canarias one from GCLP-LESO

Maybe you do a steep approch into lcy with the e jet?

@A330Driver

6 ай бұрын

That's coming up next!

@TimAyro

6 ай бұрын

@@A330DriverFrom what I've seen so far it works really well. The devs have proven themselves with that feature IMO.

Hello friends, Thank you for this great tutorial !!! I have a question; I realy want to study this aircraft. I run FS2020 on my PC. But it is also available within the store of FS2020 it self (€ 10,49). What is the quality of this in store plane compared with the one demonstrated in this video form Flightsim-Studio? Hope somebody can help. Many thanks !!!

@A330Driver

4 ай бұрын

Hi, the one in the MSFS Marketplace is even more basic than this one. Right now there is no real high fidelity Embraer 190 addon available for MSFS. There are some very good ones for the B737, A320, MD-80, BAE146, Fokker28, A300, etc. available, but we don't yet know what will ultimately happen with this Embraer. I hope they will eventually turn it just as good as those above, but right now we're quite a bit from that. If you go for an E-Jet then by all means take this one over the one from VirtualCol. But don't expect it to be high fidelity yet. It isn't.

Is there direct-to functionality yet in the FMC? If so, how can we do it?

@matthiasmatthias6126

6 ай бұрын

Yeah it is

@maximiliangeiss7078

6 ай бұрын

You can only do a "direct-to" if your are not in a STAR or APP/Arrival

@nobodyisperfect3744

6 ай бұрын

How can i do a direct - to ?

@matthiasmatthias6126

6 ай бұрын

@@nobodyisperfect3744 I think like in the B738

why dont i have the departure page there ? like in the efb? just bought the aircraft

@A330Driver

3 ай бұрын

Perhabs they changed its location with an update since the video came out? The plane is very much a work in progress still.

@pawegawrysiak3046

3 ай бұрын

@@A330Driverthank you for the response , I got it now

Question. how did you get the Crossbar FD ?

@A330Driver

6 ай бұрын

You can change it in the EFB options I believe

@paul123p

6 ай бұрын

Thanks but I just can’t see the options to do that?

Is it buggy or anything? Or does it feel like the E170/175?

@A330Driver

6 ай бұрын

wait a second. buggy *OR* feel like the E170? Ain't that the same thing?

@voie7217

6 ай бұрын

@@A330Driver haha yeah, but i mean like how the 170 used to be on luanch

Mine looks completely different

which version did you download? my cockpit doesnt look anything like that

@A330Driver

5 ай бұрын

It's the first version that got released.

@Ricky251985

5 ай бұрын

@A330Driver that version looks way better then mine. Mine has a tacky tablet and looks like fsx

@ItzHussain

4 ай бұрын

@@Ricky251985 Are you sure its the FSS not the virtualcool?

@Ricky251985

4 ай бұрын

I noticed I got the Virtualcool one

The plane won’t move when I apply throttle, and yes I check me brakes. Someone help

@A330Driver

5 ай бұрын

The best source for support is always the developers support system or their discord. Please ask there and I'm sure you'll get assistance soon.

Should I buy this plane? or give it more time?

@AIRviation

6 ай бұрын

It's the same level of complexity as the CRJ without the VNAV - depends really. If you are searching for a stable finished product - don't go for it

@A330Driver

6 ай бұрын

Nah, the CRJ has custom LNAV and is a LOT more flexible. Can’t say more than my advice in the video really.

@AIRviation

6 ай бұрын

@@A330Driver ah yeah, the lack of custom LNAV is a problem, but I found the rest of the systems to be of a similar complexity to the CRJ, maybe that's just me though.

We're can I buy this plane?

@Maplelf

6 ай бұрын

Contrail or Aerosoft

@ahmadodeh2929

6 ай бұрын

@Maplelf if I have the old plane it's same

@GarrisIiari

6 ай бұрын

​@@MaplelfContrail is much faster to update.

@Maplelf

6 ай бұрын

@@ahmadodeh2929 170/175 and 190/195 are separate. Different versions.

@andresvillenero

6 ай бұрын

@@ahmadodeh2929 yes, it's same but they will give you for free the next version of the 195 on the freighter variant

Real life E190 Pilot here. If u want a nice looking Addon, which is not an Airbus oder a Boeing. This Addon is for you. But if you want a study level Ejet for msfs, you will have to wait 2-3 years I guess. This is so far off the real thing it hurts me. The Jungleboeing is a nice aircraft with many awesome features. I would love to see pmdg style Ejet for my fellow simmers to enjoy. I think it’s just a matter of time. I would think twice spending money on a plane which has less system depth than most default aircraft. Maybe I’m a little biased, but I never heard someone say, oh the pmdg 737 or fenix 320 is way off and not realistic. I know many colleagues who use those Addons to train for checkrides and stuff. Cheers everyone ❤

@juliashenandoah3965

6 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for the info. I like the great details this plane has like at 45: 48 one can see the projector for the copilot HUD being illuminated and flickering, or during the walk-around for example the detailed gear with even the brake wear pins visible. On the other hand this plane still has a few nasty visual glitches like that missing texture chunk see-through area in the gear well. The systems are all 100% custom instead of putting in default G1000 screens, and custom computer screens (especially an FMC) need an enormous effort and great amount of time to get finished. That´s why we still don´t have an A350 or A380 after three years because simulating such complicated cockpit systems is a hard task for every development team. To be honest I know nothing about Embraer planes (flying Fenix only).... but this cockpit looks good and techy, and maybe some day this plane is going to get study-level quality, with a few circuit breakers functional and a few interesting failures and realistic oil pressure oil temp and other realistic simulated engine data. Who knows ;) A real pilot of course sees the millions of differences on all the computer screens and system pages when comparing it to the real deal, so for absolute system and avionics enthusiasts the Fenix will surely be the better plane. But to fly something completely different occasionally than the typical Airbus cockpit style this plane is a nice alternative.

Is this the e2

@A330Driver

4 ай бұрын

No

@Banjoman41911

4 ай бұрын

@@A330Driver what one is it

Off-topic. But, anyway. What's wrong with your keyboard? It's too loud. I guess that's a convenience fee?

Nice video, but I have to add something: the e170/175 is from xcraft....the e190/195 Model is from fss

@A330Driver

6 ай бұрын

Are you sure? Did they write that anywhere?

Is this available on Xbox yet

What I'm trying to understand is how do devs release further aircraft whilst their first aircraft (The 175) is pretty much Beta. One of the most obvious things that after all this time isn't implemented is vnav. Perhaps they should have asked X-craft to purchase the coding or get help coding VNAV

@A330Driver

6 ай бұрын

Money money money💰

I hope they bring this to the marketplace and Xbox in the future. They did a good job with the Tecnam aircraft, it would be nice to use their Mission Hub with a proper airliner as well.

@alwatt9367

6 ай бұрын

I would Never buy from Marketplace as, I am on V1 of Cessna 310 bought from Marketplace....Been 3 updates for the 310 still waiting for MFS to release the update V3...If I had bought the 310 from the developer would have been flying the update for over 6 weeks now...

The model looks nice, but it makes me so angry, that MSFS is not even capable of correct direct-to or Wx radar and so on, but they have already announced the next simulator.. the „old“ one not even finished… i cannot understand this step.

If youre not a real world pilot, how are you supposed to calculate TOD and when youre supposed to descend, etc. Releasing a plane like this with no VNAV or LNAV is beyond stupid.

Too stretched for my liking. Sorry.

Ah... another premature unfinished relase by FSS. Who would have guessed...?

@carolebaskin138

6 ай бұрын

This time around you shouldn't be surprised

@SpidaMez

6 ай бұрын

wait a minute, hold up. You are telling me that a plane in the early access state is UNFINISHED??? What an amazing find, we should give you some sort of award for that discovery

@roloraldo

6 ай бұрын

Of course,its early access

@Quotenwagnerianer

6 ай бұрын

"Early access" or otherwise known as: "Unpayed alpha-testing" Early access should have no place in the development flightsim add-ons.

@roloraldo

6 ай бұрын

@@QuotenwagnerianerAs long as they finish the product I don't see any problem with it,this is normal in todays gaming industry and, yes this is a game like it or not

Yet another "we'll finish it later" product. Insta-skip unfortunately.

@tompsu9536

6 ай бұрын

its actually making good progress like monthly or so, lots of new features being added

@FinlandGuy747

6 ай бұрын

What's the problem. When they improve the 170/175 it's not a big deal to bring it to the 190/175. They have basically the same systems.

@EightPawsProductionsHD

6 ай бұрын

Cool story, Bro.

@A330Driver

6 ай бұрын

The problem is that you often just don't know where the devs will call it a day and stop. We've seen that with quite some planes now that devs promised much but delivered little. Nobody knows with FSS as it's their first airliner and when we think back to their original as-close-to-scam-as-it-gets-without-being-scam adverts for the Embraers which only changed after a huge pressure arose from the community, then there is all reason to be critical of them. It's up to FSS to proofe that they will hold their promises. Until now at least they are showing good progress to indeed fulfill them however!

@namcojr

6 ай бұрын

@@FinlandGuy747 That is exactly the problem: When. Actually, it's not when, it's "IF".