compact. 20 round cap. perfection: achieved.

When will this hit the market?

@glockwhore

7 ай бұрын

The same time as the psa5 😂

@twowheels2604

6 ай бұрын

From my understanding the exact date of release will be the same day that they become available for sale.

@TheMemyselfandi23

6 ай бұрын

Next month

@FocusedHands

6 ай бұрын

Looks like ill have yet another 5.7 to add!

@AncientCityStrategic

5 ай бұрын

2 wks…

Next gun for sure... Will be interested to see ballistic testing between the barrel sizes, fps differences etc...

Looking forward to an even smaller version.

I’m getting this for sure.

I will definitely be grabbing one

That would be awesome

i think i finally found my dream gun....! but the ammo price tho

Looks like I'll have to pick one up.

🔥🔥🔥

OMG I GOTTA HAVE IT

Make this happen!!!

We need a nano compact 5.7 sidearm with a two inch barrel and a 20 round mag!! Please blow up my comment to get psa attention on this idea

@johnblaze6269

9 ай бұрын

Lol be realistic bro let’s get 3 inches down first

@thepeoplesupdates676

3 ай бұрын

Maybe with a 17-19 round mag. More possible.

We want this now psa! Hurry

Sold. Where do I pay?lol

Is this ever coming out !

Will you be able to use the regular size 5.7 mags?

In love ❤with

When will it come out need this❤❤❤❤

Any update?

His finger, must feel safe ;)

So many more people would start carrying 5.7×28 if there was a compact version, all of the 5.7 pistols out there are a little bit too big to conceal carry, I'd prefer Ruger to come out with a compact 5.7 because I already have the Ruger 5.7 and LC Carbine but if PSA made a compact Rock I would definitely be preordering one

Any updates on this?

Be nice if this was for sale by Labor Day. Hopefully they are building up pre release stock now and not delaying release like they did with the Dagger.

Only 4.4 for the compact, that's not much of a difference compared to the Rocks standard 4.7 barrel, 4.2 or shorter would be worth buying but 4.4 you'd barely notice the difference

@DrSpoon-iu4hs

3 ай бұрын

The barrel doesn’t matter much in appendix conceal carry, it’s the handle

Any updates?

Not on the Website

When can we expect end of 2023?????

Geoff - Are these available to purchase? Can't find it on the PSA site :(

@TheMemyselfandi23

6 ай бұрын

Will be soon ! Sounds like its releasing next month.

they must be just working on it cause i dont see a compact version at all bro.

When?????

I bet when they do the 8.6BLK high spin at 1:3 twist you are going to see the next under 4 inch barrel 5.7 micro with 16 round cap!!!😂🎉😂

I want to see a 4 inch barrel

I want a micro 5.7 with a 6" barrel and three 20 rnd magazines in the footprint of a Ruger lcp II. PSA please have this ready by Fall, it should sell really well. PS can you release it in 10 mm as well as 5.7, I want it for bear defense.

@griffin499

7 ай бұрын

That’s not a micro 🤨 this is a 4 inch barrel compact let’s get it down to a 3 inch barrel

@ryanestes7331

5 ай бұрын

Cut down the grip of the full sized rock to fit the new shorter rock magazines. That's probs as close as your going to get

Have they considered using the trigger style of the dagger?

Anywhere close to releases the Gun?

@geoff_tac

6 ай бұрын

I don't have an update on it, sorry.

Steven really likes to put his hand in front of the muzzle.

Take mah munneh...

Damn right when I just bought my Rock 🙄

I guess 4.4inch is compact for 5.7

Please, please,.please make one with a thumb safety!

Bwlahahaha this will be our next gun to drop. Makes dagger sabra lineup after this and releases before wow psa just wow been waiting a year already

Idk how this is gonna perform though…the short barrel will definitely hinder the velocity…and that’s what the 5.7 needs for it to be an effective round

@matthewsmith7746

Жыл бұрын

4.7 inches down to 4.4 isn't going to matter. That's less than 3/8 of an inch doodskie

@TruthGotGunz

Жыл бұрын

@@matthewsmith7746 I already seen the velocity test. It’s about 100-200 fps slower. You have the same technology and way to find this information as me, but you chose an opinionated statement. Doodskie

@WormBurnin

11 ай бұрын

@@TruthGotGunz I'm not sure how accurate that is. I've seen tests done with 45acp from a 5 to a 3.5 inch barrel and those only lost 50fps on avg. I have my doubts on how accurate those tests are especially with a hot round like 57 and only losing .3 inches. The general rule of thumb for pistols barrels and ammo is 1 inch less of barrel equals roughly 50 less fps. IDK how a .3 inch difference can do 100 let alone 200. Just my 2 cents here... seems whack but I couldn't find that test and also the gun isn't out yet so we have 0 conclusion on the final product.

@TruthGotGunz

11 ай бұрын

@@WormBurnin bro they’re 2 different calibers lol that’s like the 5.56 losing a tremendous amount of fts with a shorter barrel vs a 7.62 dont. I promise my knowledge on the 5.7 is on point. I’m not telling you anything different you won’t see for yourself if you done a velocity test on the M&P and compare it to the Ruger or the FN. 5.7 needs at least a 5 inch barrel. Anything shorter than that you have a souped up .22. These are facts.

@TruthGotGunz

11 ай бұрын

@@WormBurnin BUT, would I purchase? Of course 😂

Sooo it’s about as big as glock 17🤨. Either way sign me up.

@geoff_tac

7 ай бұрын

Yes, maybe a little slimmer. The issue they are trying to navigate is reliability with the shorter barrel.

Bro seriously ? I just bought the damn regular version 🙄

I'm curious as to why PSA doesn't offer a thumb safety variation like all the other 5.7 pistols. I know - I know... We're living in the age of the Glock clones, but even the mighty AR15 has a safety and it's considered to be a "man's" firearm. 🤔. I think a gun that will be shoved into many a draws pressing against countless nut sacks at least deserves a manual safety option.

@geoff_tac

7 ай бұрын

Supply and demand, that's a feature that adds parts and manufacturing complexity. If they are selling their stock without it, it doesn't make business sense to add complexity to something that's already selling.

@Buddyluuv214

7 ай бұрын

@@geoff_tac I understand that added features will produce higher manufacturing costs and increased sales prices, but there is a segment of the population that won't consider these pistols as an option because of the absence of a manual safety. For instance, I would likely already have several PSA pistols if manual safety options were available. Hell, I'd even be willing to pay a little extra for the manual safety option and I know many others that feel the same. It almost seems that it is not "cool" anymore to have a pistol with a manual safety. Many of us are not aspiring to be "cool" and would like for more pistols with a manual safety to be available on the open market. I understand Glock has become the industry standard and it may be hard to believe, but MANY of us are not Glock (or Glock style) fans.

@glassmw9823

7 ай бұрын

@@Buddyluuv214the segment of the market with people like you that want a manual safety is significantly smaller than the market that doesn’t want the safety. It makes *_literally no business sense_* to make less profit when a large majority are willing to purchase the pistol without the safety. I initially purchased CC pistols with a safety, but I’ve seen and read about the disadvantages, and I’ve since changed my mind and no longer want a safety. Not only this, but any modern, index-style holster covering the trigger essentially serves the purpose a safety originally did before holsters were readily available and standardized, making the safety essentially obsolete, and not only that, but a safety hazard as another step to do/remember in high-stress life or death situations. If you still want a pistol with a safety, by all means design one, and/or design the parts to sell, and you’ll be a wealthy man, if you think there’s a big enough market for a safety on this type of weapon. That’s the wonderful thing about a free-market economy. However, I don’t think the market is there for this.

@TradeDrifter

7 ай бұрын

@@glassmw9823 A safety is obsolete until you re-holster and blow your nut off. And please, save the "being careful" excuse. The whole point of an accidental discharge is it being an accident. Btw, a "high stress life or death" situation doesn't end after you defend yourself. You still have to holster while under that stress. Not to mention, as displayed in several YT videos and historical stats, more officers have been killed when not having a safety than those who did when an assailant got their fire arm. Also, it's not a hazard or another step to remember if you train with one sufficiently. It becomes automatic just like everything else train for. What you are really saying is, "I don't want a safety because my mental capacity isn't high enough to train with one." Which means, you'll probably shoot your nut off one day. As for the market, it's certainly been there for the M&P 5.7. The ones with safeties go faster than the ones without.

@FocusedHands

5 ай бұрын

you dont need a safety switch as it has a trigger blade safety built in

out of focus

Lmao totally neuter an already neutered round .... bet there will be keyholing issues ...better off just using 22 wmr at that point or switchin to a 9 or glock 29 10mm lmao

@MyBrotherMan

Жыл бұрын

Yeah man. I got my Ruger 57 for winter carry, since clothes are heavy and bears are asleep! 10mm compact for summer. But I would totally shoot a nearby sitting grouse with that beautiful 5.7 pistol if it's all I had with me! Get a carbine for it and it's a great SHTF NCO-weight setup.

@MyBrotherMan

Жыл бұрын

The number of rounds you can carry per weight is simply off the hook. I have to carry 80 just to have a balanced shoulder rig!

@WormBurnin

11 ай бұрын

How in the world is a 5.7x28 a neutered round? Muzzle velo in the ruger 57 was around 1800-2250. It already pens lvl 3 Kevlar. 9mm is sitting at 1000-1400 fps and can't pen that armor. 57 also dumps it's energy way quicker than a 9mm so it has all of that velo, hits hard upon impact with big expansion pockets but doesn't over penetrate either. In ballistics gel the 57 has bigger pockets than a 9mm and 10mm. A 4.4 barrel opposed to a 4.7 only dips the fps by around 100. Still very fast. It's literally a small rifle round but far from a 22 lr or wmr. On myth busting, the 57 has about 3 times as much ft/lbs energy and almost 2 times the velo compared to a 22 wmr. A 57 round is more similar to a 556 round, especially when shot at bullet proof glass. 9mm or 10mm doesn't even dent the front of it, while 556 and 57 blow bulges out the back with the 57s slightly being smaller. Please do a little research, your IQ is starting to show.

@KerryFairbanks

10 ай бұрын

​@@WormBurninI think maybe he's referring to original inception of 5.7 that were taken off consumer market...

@FocusedHands

5 ай бұрын

if you are talking about ss190... then any round outside of T6B and I think the black dragon rounds/the ss198lf will be neutered. But thats ammo... not the gun. Never had a keyholing issue with any 5.7 I own. From the shortest to the longest barrels. Lets wait and see what PSA has to offer before we jump to conclusions.

Now jk sooner than later I don’t care if it’s practical or not I’ll buy this golden bulldog

I've called the stores. I live in SC. None of the workers even know of it. When is this being sold!!

Why not just an even 4

@geoff_tac

Жыл бұрын

I recall them saying it has to do with reliable cycling or terminal ballistics of the round.

At least set up an email notification so I can know when y’all announce a release date or more info 🫶