NASA Scientists’ Stunning Discoveries on Planet Mercury | Ray Systems | MESSENGER Images Part 1
NASA's MESSENGER probes greatest images of Mercury's surface.
Go to buyraycon.com/astrum for 15% off your order. Brought to you by Raycon
Astrum merch now available!
Apparel: teespring.com/stores/astrum-s...
Metal Posters: displate.com/promo/astrum?art...
SUBSCRIBE for more videos about our other planets.
Subscribe! goo.gl/WX4iMN
Facebook! goo.gl/uaOlWW
Twitter! goo.gl/VCfejs
Astrum Spanish: bit.ly/2KmkssR
Astrum Portuguese: / @astrumbrasil
Donate!
Patreon: goo.gl/GGA5xT
Ethereum Wallet: 0x5F8cf793962ae8Df4Cba017E7A6159a104744038
Become a Patron today and support my channel! Donate link above. I can't do it without you. Thanks to those who have supported so far!
Image Credits: NASA
Video and images credit of Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST, www.oist.jp).
For more information, see:
“Space Detectives! Sandbox Craters Reveal Secrets of Planetary Splash Marks and Lost Meteorites” (www.oist.jp/news-center/press...)
T. Sabuwala, C. Butcher, G. Gioia, and P. Chakraborty. Ray Systems in Granular Cratering (journals.aps.org/prl/abstract...)
#planetmercury #messengerprobe #mercury #mercurynasa #messengernasa #mercuryimages #mercurysurface #astrum #nasa #whatnasasawonmercury
When something is as incredibly difficult to get to as Mercury, it is extremely tricky to study. Which is one of the reasons why in all of human history, there have only ever been 2 missions to Mercury, with just one more on the way. Mariner 10 in 1974, MESSENGER in 2011 and BepiColombo due to arrive in 2025. Of these prior two missions, only MESSENGER went into orbit around Mercury, and so it is the only mission to ever give us close up shots of Mercury’s surface. And crazily enough, some of the formations we’ve seen on the surface are still unsolved mysteries even more than a decade on, while other formations give us hints at the raw primal power of the early solar system.
Пікірлер: 993
Can’t wait to see the images that will come out on James Webb telescope. Truly a great time to be alive.
@youtubeuser2007
2 жыл бұрын
Scientifically, yes. Everything else, hell no!
@mrj3217
2 жыл бұрын
Nothing because if the government has any control they will censor the truth.
@JimBobDewayne
2 жыл бұрын
@@youtubeuser2007 Not even scientifically, with "scientists" offering their conclusions based on politics and also for money.
@damonejohnson6098
2 жыл бұрын
@@JimBobDewayne well said 👏 and true
@Ganttura1
Жыл бұрын
@@JimBobDewayne 📯
In 1962 my best friend and I volunteered to assemble some solar system mobile kits for our 6th grade teacher. We were well aware at the time that the respective proportions and features of the planets were crude, at best. But the project really did fire up our imaginations as to what the planets really looked like in reality. It is so wonderful all these decades hence to see what has been discovered.
@glenwaldrop8166
2 жыл бұрын
It's funny, on the original Star Trek they made all the planets a blob of color, fuzzy like the images we had of the planets at the time. They orbited a low resolution version of a planet. The info we've gathered in just my lifetime is astounding. We didn't have a proper map of Earth in the 80s, we had some images, mostly maps. Today we have satellite maps of most of the planets in our solar system, maybe all at this point. Hell, when I was little they taught us Jupiter had 16 moons, Saturn had 26, we had to learn them all. Today Jupiter is known to have around 50 and some of them are just numbered.
@dancingtrout6719
2 жыл бұрын
hi,, we worked on projects in class Building models of the apollo Rockets
@flyfishing1776
2 жыл бұрын
🤔 in 1962 my Grandma turned 8 years old. She talks of " hide under desk in of nuked"
@mstump7219
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this comment, I always love reading messages like these
@jeromebarry1741
2 жыл бұрын
@@dancingtrout6719 My high school Drafting teacher had helped design the Saturn V.
i never thought of it much, but i have to say i was curious about why some impact craters looked the way they do. now i know thanks to this channel.
@luisito6314
2 жыл бұрын
That comment almost made me cry 😭
@leomartin1603
2 жыл бұрын
Electrical discharges created those craters.
@hipioty
2 жыл бұрын
@@luisito6314 why?
@progiddalamdenport
2 жыл бұрын
I love this channel. Space is cool to the max !!!
@leomartin1603
2 жыл бұрын
@Robocrop SLIGHTEST.🤔
Clearly one of the best channels on KZread. Thank you.
Thanks, Alex!
Technology is amazing. I was in college 35 years ago...we didn't have the Internet, KZread, cell phones, and the other billion gadgets we have now. Watching this 12 mins video in 1080p60 is just mind blowing. Thanks
@jr2904
2 жыл бұрын
I'm 32 and I am still amazed that we can watch this in HD on our phones only on the wireless network, my first phone was an old Nokia and back then I was amazed to be able to text people lol.
@GraveUypo
2 жыл бұрын
@@jr2904 i installed a game on my car's infotainment system and i was lost in the same kind of wonder. what i wouldn't give in my childhood to have the device that nowadays wastes its power and life showing me a map and a speedometer.
@shanemcdaniel1509
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I can learn more in one night that took you a year to learn in college years ago moreless agreeing with you.
@nagualdesign
2 жыл бұрын
I'm 44 and I would find today's technology mind-blowing were it not for the fact that I remember all the intervening years of steady progress. I guess if I'd spent the last few decades on a desert island the modern world would come as quite a shock, but I didn't.
I love how, instead of just expecting people to like & subscribe by telling them to, he says “and I hope by the end of this episode to have earned your like and subscription.” What a class act. 👍🏼👍🏼
Ever since I read I, Robot I have been in love with the surface of Mercury. Really just alien planets in general. The way Asimov's explains the surface e of Mercury really shows how truly alien it would be.
@edibleapeman2
2 жыл бұрын
2312 is another science fiction book set on Mercury, if you’re interested. It’s a soft-sequel to Robinson’s Mars trilogy but those books aren’t required reading.
@glenchapman3899
2 жыл бұрын
An old but really good short story is Brightside crossing. Like you I find stories set on Mercury just that much more compelling than other planets
@davidm5707
2 жыл бұрын
@@edibleapeman2 Fascinating book.
@davidm.4670
2 жыл бұрын
Decades ago I read 'Battle on Mercury' don't remember author SF story.
Mercury bodyblocking. I love it!
Awesome channel with awesome content and great quality as always 🌍💯💖
I absolutely love your channel. I have been an amateur astrologist for my entire life and I questioned the splattered rays of Mercury’s surface. I do have to say that I had the same idea as the students because there has always been an assortment of ray sizes so it only made sense that the surface was not smooth when impact occurred. It is nice to know that I was somewhat on the same thought path. Thank you for all the hard work you put into your videos. I will always be an avid fan.
@theq4602
Жыл бұрын
I really hope you mean armature astronomer. Astrologists are the ones who think you can tell peoples fortunes or personalities using the stars and planets
Excellent video. Thank you.
Astrum is 50 times better than Discovery Chanel.
@GraveUypo
2 жыл бұрын
well discovery channel kinda turned into business reality show channel a decade or so ago... so no contest.
Very informative channel.
Honestly this was so calming
Loved hearing how Mercury has to "body block" objects from going past (towards the Sun), rather than capturing them in orbit--with its relatively miniscule gravity.
@sethdrake7551
2 жыл бұрын
i was just thinking, if thats the case doesnt that mean mercury has to be relatively close to the sun's roche limit?
@cortster12
2 жыл бұрын
@@sethdrake7551 It's actually more than 30 times the distance from its rouche limit, I believe. So no, not close at all.
@karlsjunior466
2 жыл бұрын
I never did believe that theory. Its too small to divert much of anything, much less get it to smack the surface at a 90 degree angle almost every time. Makes no sense. Think giant electrical discharges. They almost always happen at a 90 degree angle. The solar system is much different than we are being told.
@harrywalker5836
2 жыл бұрын
@@karlsjunior466 a teacher ,science, of ours, back in 60,s. said, are all impact craters from impacts. hell,,we dont know,, he had a rectangle fish ''bowl'',, 1/3 filled with sand, & a small air hose/hole, thru base, 1 short squert,,1 perfect crater.. plus, if you look at the moon,& see a crater directly facing earth,,did the meteor pass thru earth.?. thing is,,the moon is not,our satelite, it was put there. to calm earth.. fact..
@karlsjunior466
2 жыл бұрын
@@harrywalker5836 the moon and mercury are tidally locked meaning that one side always faces the earth, or sun for mercury. Experiments have shown that electricity has a very big role in this. When the moon was closer to earth massive electrical charges were exchanged between the two creating the massive craters and tendrils that we see on this side of the moon. On the other side there are thousands of smaller craters and more than 99 percent of them are direct impacts according to these scientists. There is no possible way that almost every meteor could strike a small body like the moon at a 90 degree angle like that. Most would be at a lower angle just because of odds. Electricity is the answer and the early solar system probably had much more flowing through it in the early times causing most of the craters. There are electric experiments that show how electricity makes craters. Even some of the features we see on mars and other celestial bodies. Of course these experiments are ignored and downplayed by mainstream science because it goes against everything they have been taught and are teaching currently. Nobody likes to be wrong but scientists have a duty to look into these things. Science advances one funeral at a time. Electrical scientists have many answers that the mainstream does not. And the mainstream don't want to lose their funding on projects that will never find an answer. But it keeps big money in their pockets.
I love the many mysteries of Mercury. So close, yet so hard to observe!
Loved the video. Mercury is a fascinating place. I can't wait to learn more about the universe and beyond.
@elongatedmusk3132
2 жыл бұрын
🤔 ...& Beyond? Interesting
@obieldenook1142
2 жыл бұрын
@@elongatedmusk3132 Never know, right?
@talancae
2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if humans will visit mercury in the future
@khloests
2 жыл бұрын
@@talancae that would be kinda crazy because the temperature on that planet is crazy. i honestly find it pretty cool though.
@talancae
2 жыл бұрын
@@khloests yeah, i bet we will visit it someday, if we dont auto distruct ourself first xD
Who designed the astrum logo, its so good
Excellent video Alex,Mercury is awsome looking place....
Mercury doesn't get enough of the limelight in my opinion. It's a very interesting planet with many secrets to uncover. I look forward to seeing the next one. Is the upcoming mission to Mercury going to involve a probe perhaps?
@anomalychasing5383
Жыл бұрын
Play with brightness and contrast on this at 6:48 to see the real surface.
I've learned more from Alex than I have my astronomy class in college.
@saltycreole2673
2 жыл бұрын
You are so right!! I had one astronomy teacher in college who acted like a rock star. Too busy to actually teach and open minds. The other one thought he was too smart to be teaching at that level, but was the only way to get grants. I'm Just venting.
@monteverdi1567
2 жыл бұрын
@@saltycreole2673 unfortunately such professorial arrogance is not confined to Astronomy:(
@devo1977s
2 жыл бұрын
And the big reveal is you astronomy professor moonlights as Alex
@jr2904
2 жыл бұрын
@@saltycreole2673 I had a teacher who didn't even know the constellations. I made a presentation of the constellations using my own photos of the sky. He borrowed my notes from my highschool astronomy class and never returned them. He just went on and on about Rich dad poor dad and trying to make money from selling and breeding snakes. My highschool teacher now teaches at university of Arkansas, so if anyone is in that area, I highly recommend Dr Barth, he is and was a brilliant teacher! He was teaching highschool physics, chemistry, and astronomy all while going to school himself for his PhD. He even wrote some educational sci-fi books called Maurice goes to the moon and Mars. He was my favorite teacher, if you couldn't tell haha
@lordnagatron
2 жыл бұрын
Because college is about money and being woke.
9:42 It can get cold on Mercury? WHAT!?!?! HOW!?!?!? That blows my mind!
"Which is one of the reasons why in all of human history, there have only ever been 2 missions to Mercury, with just one more on the way". That sounds unintentionally ominous.
Mercury is the ultimate shipyard planet
Just starting to watch and the image ant 0:12 really struck me. It's like the surface was molten as it was being pummeled, cooled, and continued to get pummeled. (edit) At 8:53 the fracturing glass effect: Is it possible that a molten surface could vitrify on cooling and thereby be shattered by an impact?
@rustic.sourav
2 жыл бұрын
On the same page, I think it more replicates a stone falling on dense clay rather than brittle shattering. From my perspective it looks like the surface was not perfectly solid when hit and then cooled relatively quickly to form that pattern.
Wow!!!!
Great video. I’ve seen a bunch of speculation about the Pantheon Fossae and I would like to add my own. Given Mercury’s proximity to the sun and the large number of objects that have struck its surface, is there a possibility that a very large object had a near miss? Such a large object could exert tremendous tidal forces on Mercury’s surface, perhaps causing the unexplained buckling. It’s just a hypothesis but I imagine modern computer modeling could test it.
@Unethical.Dodgson
2 жыл бұрын
I think that's a valid hypothesis. However! There remains the issue that the affected region is still really small. If tidal forces were responsible for a fracture - then perhaps we would expect to see further fracturing further away from that point. Perhaps even on the opposing side of the planet. Still. It's worthwhile to try and model it.
@vincejohnm
2 жыл бұрын
@Clambert Jamdrip What does water have to do with anything? Io experiences massive tidal forces from Jupiter and it has no water. If the object was sufficiently close, it would not have to be larger than Mercury.
@vincejohnm
2 жыл бұрын
@@Unethical.Dodgson I agree. A symmetrical marking on the other side would be somewhat of a smoking gun. Pretty sure we’ve seen the whole surface so that might be out. Anyways, something to think about and thanks for commentary
@meacadwell
2 жыл бұрын
Stupid question here - Is Mercury close enough to the sun that a sun flare could have heated up the planet surface enough to cause the 'sand' to melt into a glass-like substance and that's what caused this fracturing?
@timcross2510
2 жыл бұрын
You nailed it. I can't say why I know, but your idea is very close to the causal events. Well done!
At 2:26 , we can see a fascinating thing. Notice that four of the largest "impact craters" shown have a conspicuous smaller crater located exactly on their rims. This "rimshot" feature is exactly the same as that exhibited by electrical cratering left behind by arc welders, on the surface of steel. If you examine microscopic images of welding erosion, where arcs of extremely high voltage have been leaving behind marks on the steel, you can see precisely the same features. This is not a new observation, the rimshot crater phenomenon has been observed on the moon, and most everywhere else too. The frame at 2:36 , however, is neat because it shows numerous examples quite clearly. The argument for electrical discharge making these features rests on the peculiar pattern, and also the statistical improbability of so many impact craters having another smaller impact crater precisely on their rim, and always after the first impact. For example, ponder the probability that four of the largest craters in one frame of video have this feature, by pure chance of asteroids randomly striking the surface.
@user-bz6gh5ng2m
2 жыл бұрын
This is genuinely more interesting than the entire video.
@suppenkaschper4686
2 жыл бұрын
@@user-bz6gh5ng2m check thunderbolts project on yt if u interestd in this subject
@robertakerman3570
2 жыл бұрын
@@user-bz6gh5ng2m Dirty iceball hitting hot pavements. Scatter + water awaiting The Freeze of night. Inquiring minds... Seems like all that activity is DONE.
@reshpeck
2 жыл бұрын
@@robertakerman3570 Thank you for contributing
@TheDalaiLamaCon
2 жыл бұрын
Billy Yelverton's Plasma lab.
The gaps in the cracks of Pantheon Fossae look like the area broke when lifted not struck from above. If it were a sinkhole-like situation I think the cracks would be closed. Imagine tremendous heating from below to create a glass-like surface. After it cooled subsequent uplifting broke it.
@TheyForcedMyHandLE
2 жыл бұрын
It looks like it's in the center of a giant lava flow to me. That's my 1min of thought and inspection. 10:48
@abelis644
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheyForcedMyHandLE You're right, it definitely looks like that! Good eye!
@danielm5535
2 жыл бұрын
Are there any features at the antipode which might be a hint at a thing or stuff?
I have been a subscriber for three years, for w/e reason, I had to re-subscribe. Ty for all of your awesome looks into our universe.
@UnitSe7en
2 жыл бұрын
That's been a feature of KZread since before they added the bell.
one thing, out of many, that i love about this channel is that he covers exactly what the descriptions say. I would honestly say that a good 90% of the videos i click on, don't give the viewers what they say they are going to. They use clickbait techniques just to get the views. Other channels would have said something like this " scientists just discovered something on Mercury that have left them baffled" or something like that. I have never been disappointed with any of these episodes.
thank you atsrom for some fascinating incite into the make up of mercury's surface & well done to those students for solving the spiderweb mystery, excellent work to both of you & yes there are many more puzzles to solve regarding mercury's surface as yes it is forever changing probably because it is so close to the sun
Scientist not being able to figure out impact rays perfectly illustrates the problem with technocrats without any real-world experience. btw, I'm sure the fact that impactors generally wouldn't be perfectly smooth spheres plays just as much of a role.
@Quickened1
2 жыл бұрын
In addition to that, when there's an impact, there's likely often a massive explosion near or above the surface, which would also create random ejecta... Not just a marble dropped in flour...lol
@BornAgainCynic0086
2 жыл бұрын
@@Quickened1 why, is there an atmosphere on Mercury?
@rais1953
2 жыл бұрын
@@BornAgainCynic0086 There isn't. There's a wispy exosphere created by the interaction of the sun with the chemical composition of the surface.
@MichaelClark-uw7ex
2 жыл бұрын
They try so hard to eliminate variables that could cause anomalous results that they over sterilize the experiment to the point of being useless. Even a layman can see that a homogenous surface and a homogenous impactor would create a homogenous ejecta pattern, duh.
@RadeticDaniel
2 жыл бұрын
@@MichaelClark-uw7ex over sterilization is a good analogy, I'm gonna used it for sure! While important to control environment variations, that was just overkill indeed. As you said it, a bunch of homogenous objects interacting already hints at something
So many endless wonders to see
Man your almost at 1mil. Keep up the hard work brother & congratulations in advance. I’ve been sub since 400k ✌🏽
You guys deserve so many more subscribers! Love your content
@raidermaxx2324
2 жыл бұрын
i think its just one guy fyi
@tylerdyke318
2 жыл бұрын
@@raidermaxx2324 even more impressive then! 😁
@raidermaxx2324
2 жыл бұрын
@@tylerdyke318 no doubt
I remember hearing how the sun's rays electrically charge some of the surface dust on the moon, which causes some of the dust to slightly suspend itself and move as a build up of static electricity occurs. I imagine that the movement of such dust could eventually cause some erosion, or even start to fill and level out some craters on such solar objects. So, the uneven filling or erosion of craters could be attributed to a difference in how the suns energy reaches the crater.
@UnitSe7en
2 жыл бұрын
No. It is not as you imagine.
@blvck1635
2 жыл бұрын
@@UnitSe7en how do you know? Did the moon tell you?
@Unethical.Dodgson
2 жыл бұрын
@@blvck1635 We know that craters on the moon's surface are eroded in most part (to a very high degree) by the Solar Winds and Micro-meteorites. Essentially. The surface of the Moon is being constantly bombarded by charged particles and small rocks and ice. While there may be... some truth to particles on the surface of the moon being charged and perhaps even moving slightly (very slightly). That would account for a fraction, of a fraction, of a percent of the erosion that we observe. It's not that minerals on the moon aren't charged and remain static. Just that it's not enough to account for the kind of erosion that we see.
@nicholascorbett1256
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah @UnitSe7en how do you know this better than Pain. If pain knows anything, it knows about getting hit in the face with Facts lmfao
@replexity
2 жыл бұрын
@@UnitSe7en u love pretending that u have an answer
Very intriguing topic, so glad for the information on Mercury. im looking forward to future updates when it becomes available
I really appreciate how you put your add all the way at the end , that makes me listen and understand your video much better and even makes me watch your add at the end , thanks for that and for the awesome videos
I never imagined Mercury would be so interesting.
@UnitSe7en
2 жыл бұрын
Perhaps you've just never imagined.
Love this channel. Thank you. You really have Great production and great narration abilities. You touch my soul with the visible magic and tickle my fancy with the knowledge imparted. Again, Thank you. I have a neck injury from a patient that went "batshite crazy" on PCP. I choked him out (Powerlifter, jujitsu, state champ wrestler) But at 5ft8in 205lbs, i was tiny compared to his 6ft4in 295lbs of brickshite house built beef. Plus being on PCP excaserbated the situation against my favor. He caught me unawares from behind. Snuck out of his mental health room (padded room) and attacked 3 people. Laid out the two. Yes, charges were pressed. He wasn't a bad guy, turns out, video evidence shows an unknown guy put the pcp in his drink when he was unaware. He is looking at 15 to 25 years. It's a shite situation all around. Anyways your videos, SEAs, John Godier, and a few others have helped me get through the depression and severe pain.
So awesome thanks for the free video! The Pantheon Fossae are supper interesting I thought the same thing volcanic activity!
This channel is so underrated! So glad I've been watching for so long, can't wait for you to hit 1M!!!
In looking at the Apollodorus feature from different angles in your video, I noted two things: a much larger possibly very old crater feature, and a smaller crater rim, into which the Apollodorus object crashed. An underlying very large ancient impact area might have changed the resulting surface & material. Great vid, BTW.
@cinidevil
Жыл бұрын
It can be in the antipode of a ridiculously large impact?
Mercury is my fav. She's super cute and smart. Also the planet is cool.
@GraveUypo
2 жыл бұрын
it's actually pretty hot, not cool at all. the planet, that is.
@DeconvertedMan
2 жыл бұрын
@@GraveUypo Well I stand correct, she is hot, and so is the planet.
@nagualdesign
2 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure that the messenger of the gods was male. Though it's the 2020s so I guess Mercury could be re-cast as female. How about a "female of colour"? And as well as being the god of commerce, eloquence, communication, divination, travelers and thieves, etc., she could also be the goddess of gender studies, equality and retroactive continuity. I'm only kidding. Planets don't have genders. 😜
@DeconvertedMan
2 жыл бұрын
@@nagualdesign I'm talking about Sailor Mercury. She's always been a girl.
@nagualdesign
2 жыл бұрын
@@DeconvertedMan Whatever floats your boat. 😉
This channel is bussin, learnt more here than my entire school career
The visualizations you've presented here are tremendous. Your explanations are well in line with current planetary theories. There is another explanation getting some attention for the last decade that I've followed it: the electric universe. It has reasonable explanations for some of the features that are difficult to asses in current geological formations. Reguardless, Thank you for posting these images, along with which satellites took them. Great stuff, carry on . . .
Here’s a thought. Could it be that most observed impact sites were caused by rocky masses wile the Pantheon Fossae impactor simply have a had a significantly different material makeup, such as being some random chunk of ice or other frozen gases, or even a small comet - something that may itself have a tendency to shatter as opposed to the ground itself being unusually brittle. There are also a number of valleys that look like they could have been created by a fluid erosion process as would be the result of pouring water onto compacted sand or flour, or accumulated space dust. If the impactor was indeed composed of ice or other frozen gas could it be possible those valleys were formed by its material remnants after the initial impact as they briefly flowed before evaporating away? Just a thought, like I said…
Maybe it was something like a comet that had much different electric charge than the planet. This could result in an enormous lightning bolt reaching out between the planet and impactor when it got close enough to the surface and could leave a similar scar. Lightning bolt leaves one scar, then the impactor collides leaving a crater.
@UnitSe7en
2 жыл бұрын
No. The electric universe theory is hogwash.
@MakeStuffDoMore
2 жыл бұрын
@@UnitSe7en I said nothing about an electric universe. It's just simple science.
@UnitSe7en
2 жыл бұрын
@@MakeStuffDoMore No, it's not.
@MakeStuffDoMore
2 жыл бұрын
@@UnitSe7en Right on brother. I'm not gonna argue about it. I was just giving my 2 cents on what I think it could be.
@thenasadude6878
2 жыл бұрын
The problem is that the Sun is constantly bombarding its surroundings with charged particles of all kinds. If such a charged comet or asteroid would come this close, its charge would neutralize, because it would repel similar charges in the solar wind and attract opposite ones
Love the speeded up clip of grapes turning into raisins! Also I wonder how many of the features of Mercury happened when it still had a molten surface before it solidified, or if the impacts generate enough heat to temporarily melt the surface which then heats and cools over a few 'days' before it sets solid again. Looking forward to whatever science shows from the next mission. Another exciting space news event to look forward to...! You're right the objects flying round the sun near Mercury have a lot more momentum than they do near the moon, but how much of a difference does it make if they are all orbiting the sun at almost the same rate as Mercury itself? Oh of course - they would be in other directions in eccentric and/or inclined orbits.
Thanks Alex ,excellent as always!
Cool
Curious to know why it's thought the ridges were caused by the core cooling and why they could not be the edges of tectonic plates instead. Active tectonics would explain the smoothing effects seen as well.
It's not often that you get to hear about Mercury. Thank you for a very interesting video.
Perhaps one of those students asked their dog what type of surface to try in their crater test. Student: Hey, Spot, what type of surface should we try next? Dog: _Ruf!_
Awesome video! Pantheon Fossae is most likely caused by doming (about 300 km across) in the centre of the Caloris Basin which then later collapsed and fractured, with the Appolodorus crater coincidentally occurring later.
1:12 Its refreshingly good to see someone with quality content just asking that if you think you have earned a like, please like. At the end of this one mate, you more than earned my like. have a good one! looking forward to the next one :)
Your narration is superb Alex. Absolutely brilliant!
I would like to see you try to explain all the octagon craters. Thanks for your video
That mysterious crater with its odd rays is indeed fascinating. I wonder what the temperatures are during the day compared to the night? Being so close to the Sun, the surface facing it would be incredibly hot, I should think. Could the surface be melted into glass? But then, if the glass was molten it wouldn't shatter. Hmm. I guess I'll have to ask _Tom Swift_ to visit there and find out!
@rogerstone3068
2 жыл бұрын
Mercury is tidally locked to the sun - with only a slight wobble - so they is no day-heating, night-freezing alternation.
@scribblescrabble3185
2 жыл бұрын
"Being so close to the Sun, the surface facing it would be incredibly hot, I should think." eh, not so much, the average Venus night is hotter than Mercury peak daytime temperatures. Why? Because green house effect. @Roger Stone "Mercury is tidally locked to the sun" No, its rotation is in a 3:2 resonace with the orbit
Comets must hit Mercury with at least twice the speed they hit the Earth, so four times the energy.
Interesting as always, thank you!
Love your channel. It’s incredible how much I’ve learned and discovered thanks to you! Much appreciated and Thank You for the amazing vid once again! Lol, loved the comment “from VHS to Blu-Ray ..Bly-RayCon😀… With regards to the shattering effect on the surface of Mercury, could it be possible that the sand was somehow superheated and formed glass, like we see in some deserts on earth?
The fracture could be because when sand heats up it turns into glass, it could create a huge and very thick sheet of glass when it cools down, so if something hit it, it will fracture, and keep fracturing into smaller and smaller pieces as more asteroids hit. The bomb that fell on Heroshima left a thick sheet of glass on the surface of the ground as it melted and cooled off.
@dennissweeney6774
2 жыл бұрын
TRINITITE
@jeffbenton6183
2 жыл бұрын
I think the surface needs to be mostly sand for that to happen. It might turn a thin layer of regolith into a thin sheet of glass, I don't think it could turn solid rock into glass.
I wonder what the opposite side of mercury looks like to the pantheon fossae. I wonder if something hit the other side so hard it the force radiated through the planet and cracked the crust on the other side.
@care2think611
2 жыл бұрын
Troy - Yes I too was wondering if 180 degrees from that odd formation was a huge impact crater whose waves of force focused and probably raised the surface a little. Antipode is the name of the effect I believe. Probably raised even more by the gravity of the Sun if antipode was facing that way. Just a guess.
@UnitSe7en
2 жыл бұрын
The antipode does not posses any significant feature. If this were the case it would be obvious and not a mystery.
@troyorem
2 жыл бұрын
@@UnitSe7en perhaps then it has something to do with latent seismic activity while the planet cooled?
This is fancinating! Thank you for this.
oh i love this, this is really good video about mercury, all of you videos are amazing
Hi
Was Mercury always tidally locked to face the sun with one side? If so it seems odd that the craters are equally distributed over the surface. It would seem to me that there would be fewer objects that would hit the sunlit side because they would have to come around the rim of the sun at an angle to hit Mercury at all.
@stardogMLB
2 жыл бұрын
Mercury's not tidally locked.
@cecilbrisley5185
2 жыл бұрын
Scale. Get three people together. Give one a laser pointer. Give the other a dinner plate. Now hold a pinhead 40 feet away from the dinner plate. Now see how little the dinner plate prevents the targeting of any part of that pin head. Also understand that impacts can occur at any angle, not just 90 degrees. Yes circular craters are created by shallow angle impacts due to the exploding of the impactor on contact - of course the scale demonstration will show that steep angle impacts are not eliminated at all on the side of mercury facing the sun anyways. Mercury tidal locking is a bit different, resulting in a pattern of movement rather than a rigid lock of one perfect hemisphere always facing the sun. People do debate whether to call it tidally locked or not. For me, it is being forced into a specific pattern by tidal forces enough for me to think of it as a subset of tidal locking. Elliptical tidal locking is my favorite description for what is happening.
@rais1953
2 жыл бұрын
@@cecilbrisley5185 The information given above may be from the time when Mercury was believed to be tidally locked. In fact it is now known that it isn't tidally locked at all. Every part of Mercury experiences day and night over a period of 176 Earth days. Only some deep polar craters never see the Sun.
@Thisisaweirdthing2makeusdo
2 жыл бұрын
It’s not it’s rotates really really slowly.
@Lopfff
2 жыл бұрын
Wow, I had the same question. Came to the comments only to discover Mercury is not tidally locked. The internet is so smart! Incidentally, when did they figure out that Mercury actually rotates?
Thank you for the reintroduction to Mercury. More please!
You've earned my like and subscription.. Keep up the good work.
As usual, marvelous presentation. Given that Mercury's regolith (and perhaps lighter-colored interior) is composed of such varied chemistry, and given that Pantheon Fossae faces the sun, could the fracturing be the result of solar incidence and interaction on peculiar rock. Rather than volcanic upwellings, could Mercury's surface "burn" differentially top-down from a solar flare?
@rais1953
2 жыл бұрын
Mercury rotates slowly so all parts of the planet face the sun during its long days, except at the poles.
@benbertsch8496
2 жыл бұрын
I think we should look for a large crater on the direct opposite side of the planet
@raidermaxx2324
2 жыл бұрын
you sound like a possible scientist. Do you have a theory of how mercury was formed?
@drewdegen9043
2 жыл бұрын
@@raidermaxx2324 I am not a working scientist, but I am scientifically literate. From what I understand, all the rocky inner planets up to Jupiter formed from the collapse of a planetary nebulae of dust grains and small rocks. Views of numerous exoplanets reveal planets forming around stars, clearing out lanes of debris as they accumulate matter and the many moons of Jupiter and Saturn similarly cleared out debris orbits to form. Thanks for the "Like."
@drewdegen9043
2 жыл бұрын
@@benbertsch8496 Good idea! Several solar system bodies show opposite side anomalies due to massive impacts.
Alas, why we humans don't focus on exploration and making our life better, instead of waging wars and killing each other with animal fury! It is the wild part of humans who declares war, and the good ones have to pay for their craziness. I celebrate any non-military application of technology and discovery, and I thank you Alex for your peaceful and wonderful videos!
The way you explain the situations is very good. No drama just interesting point of view …
This was awesome. Thanks!
What if Mercury is a core of a gas planet who atmosphere has been evaporated. Surface temperatures under the thick atmosphere turned the old hot surface to glass at a temp over 1700 degrees C. As atmosphere was blown away in the fashion of a mega comet the surface cooled and crumpelled. The remaining heavy mainly iron core is all that remains. Other evidence of something happening in the early inner solar system is why all five (including Moon) are mainly rocky bodies with usually less substantive atmospheres rather than gas giants which are more typical in other star systems.
@thenasadude6878
2 жыл бұрын
I find the idea of a Mercury gas giant intriguing, but it has to have happened quickly to account for all the craters. Also gas Giants have powerful magnetic fields that would slow down erosion from the sun. Maybe it was a bit like Venus, an Earth like planet with an even thicker atmosphere? Huge greenhouse effect and proximity to the Sun would account for the not so gassy situation
FIRST
Awesome vid as always
I hope you get to 1 million subscribers soon! Great content, as always.
I love this spinning ball earth with curved water theory! Looking forward to witness curved water for the first time, never seen it happen sadly 😴
ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY = about 70 years in space. Come on man!
@nagualdesign
2 жыл бұрын
I just posted much the same complaint, only with more belligerence and exasperation. 😊 I'm glad I'm not the only one!
Awe inspiring! Thanks, man.
I'm glad watching your interesting videos❤❤❤
Great video thank you!
Incredible video Thank you
Fascinating! Thanks, Alex🖖
I have checked out the Raycon Earbuds and they will be my next purchase. The addition of the stabilizers kicks battery life up to 54 hours, that’s unbelievable. Thank you for the Earbud referral.
The cracked crater surround perhaps were the liquefied and hardened remains from an older and larger impact crater which was stuck again creating the cracks.
thx 4 sharing
Thanks for the info, that was a great vid Dude! TFS, GB :)
Mercury’s so interesting with its impact craters and ridges,rotation and eccentricity and it’s half degree tilt making it possible for ice to exist at the poles.
6:00 these same rays can be seen on the moon in some of the fresher craters.
@UnitSe7en
2 жыл бұрын
We are aware.
Great video!
thanks for the great vid :)
you already have my love and subscription my dude
Very interesting and informative great vlog very professional,
As always top quality video
Thanks, great photo's
I wasn't even all that interested in Mercury, but the thing about the students getting the 'spider legs' of astroid impacts correct was fascinating. YOu've earned my like; you already had my subscription 😉