If you can, please support Al Muqaddimah financially: www.Patreon.com/AlMuqaddimah Sorry about the lighting. I know it's distracting but I don't have much experience with recording videos.

@death-istic9586

9 ай бұрын

Hi.

@beepboop204

9 ай бұрын

@mujtabashah3667

9 ай бұрын

No thank you.

@nietzschean6987

9 ай бұрын

wanna highlight somethings: 1) get your stuff right. there's alot of "according some sources", "wahtever that means" and "not sure". there is a subject in islamic studies called "study of names and personalities". if you find some narration in a source find about its authencity by confirming chain of narrators. 2) caliph is combination of two: i) moral and religious sanctity ii) secular authority. 3) legality of muavia(ra) rule is not only contested but outright rejected by both shia and sunni sources. 4) you portrayed ali(ra) as weak kind of administrator which is wrong. he'd been advisor and administrator for all 3 rushdins in medina. he faced alot harder circumstances than muavia(ra), he didn't fight 3 battles one after the other.

@beepboop204

9 ай бұрын

@@nietzschean6987 sick edgelord virtue signalling!

I respect your honesty in admitting that Yazid is responsible for the death of Hussain ibn Ali instead of trying to duck and weave it. And Im surprised to see how you viewed Yazid but I want you to keep in Mu'awiyah was the one who raised a monster like this and that should be acknowledged. Please make a video about Yazid and his actions with Karbala as well as what he did in Madinah and Mecca

@Nedwin

9 ай бұрын

My brother, I always cry remembering how sayyidina Ali's family ended up.

@jamieammar6131

9 ай бұрын

The sons are not their fathers. Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr was one of the alleged killers of Uthman. Muwawiyah had several children. One of them turning out to be a sociopath, not really crazy. Happens.

@Anonymous-vi3ug

9 ай бұрын

I agree but having Yazid close to him growing up and then handing off the keys to the Ummah to him... Muawiyah has some responsibility over what happened in the following years. Just saying. Im not even Shia no more (by todays standards of "Shia") but I can acknowledge the facts and look at history rationally. @@jamieammar6131

@talhaahmed2130

4 ай бұрын

@@jamieammar6131mu’awiyah showed with his own actions that he was an opportunist.

@jamieammar6131

4 ай бұрын

@@talhaahmed2130 Yes he was. Well, politics was really complicated at the time, and tribalism was rampant.

I am really liking these detailed videos man. I love this new format. Keep it up!

@AlMuqaddimahYT

9 ай бұрын

Thank you! Thank you for your help in setting it up.

@chumajamesnxele106

9 ай бұрын

​@@AlMuqaddimahYT9:28 I have that picture on my phone. You covered Uthman's face because he's black. Thus denying the truth, thus denying the Prophet, thus denying Allah. You are a kaffir and you are going to Jahannam for this one. Promise.

@tjbergren

9 ай бұрын

@@AlMuqaddimahYT. How much of your presentation is found in 7th century/early 8th century CE sources? I’d love to access them! Thanks for your hard work…

@newonevery740

9 ай бұрын

But unfortunately he is full of it

@AMAli-ct5df

9 ай бұрын

​@@newonevery740get a life

Zubair was not killed during the battle! He was assassinated after leaving the field

@footballislife4405

9 ай бұрын

By marwan so was umar assassinated by mughira bin shaoba’s slave just as umar r.a. Was removing him from the governor of Syria

@abumussab844

9 ай бұрын

​@@footballislife4405Zubair wasn't killed by Marwan. Talha was killed by Marwan.

@MuhammadUsman-xk6ir

8 ай бұрын

fake story, @@abumussab844

@user-xq6xu3fo8c

8 ай бұрын

Zubair was killed by a klansman of. Ahnaf b qays

@antokarman2064

4 ай бұрын

Amogus irl

Great music and editing my friend. Be proud!

Once again, I want to emphasize that your perspective in your narrations are truly historical, without any theological influence. This makes your channel an invaluable resource for history enthusiasts.

@RS-zt5zj

8 ай бұрын

BS. His neutral point of view on this issue can only exist if he takes into account the writings of sunni theologians. Neutral western assessments, or just neutral assessments in general, cant allow for this positive portrayal of Muawiyah.

@izaynkhalid

4 ай бұрын

Muawiya was a terrible person, if you read history properly though his cursed son surpassed him. but the seeds were planted by Muawiya himself.

@pakilla4578

3 ай бұрын

​@@RS-zt5zjbecause Shia sources are sooo believable, right?

I just find the timing rather ironic 😂

@ayubk2638

9 ай бұрын

At least its not about Yazid 💀

@somebody2627

9 ай бұрын

Why?

@Meliodasthesinofwrath

9 ай бұрын

'Caliph' Mu'wawiyah Ruled Like Dae$h * Shaykh Farhan Al Maliki Explains!

@napoleonrabbit

9 ай бұрын

​@@MeliodasthesinofwrathKeep your sectarian speakers to yourself.

@harharharharharharharharha240

9 ай бұрын

Could you explain? Does it have to do with karbala?

Great video as always 👍😊

Just two days ago I was reading about the Radhidun succession struggles and now you made this. Just wonderful! Loved it! Keep up the good work! However I would love to know what kind of books are there behind you.

Muawiyah I became caliph less than 30 years following the death of The Messenger of God; prophet Muhammad (Muawiyah's brother in law) and very shortly after the reign of the four "rightly guided" (Rashidun) caliphs. Although many believe that Muawiyah I was considered to be lacking in the justice and piety of the Rashidun, Muawiyah was also the first caliph whose name appeared on coins, inscriptions, or documents of the nascent Islamic empire. Anyway I always love his quote below: "I never use my sword when the lash suffices, nor the lash when my tongue is enough." _Muawiyah ibn abi Sufyan. Thanks for the review brother Syawish, very well-presented! ❤

Will you ever make a video on the deccan sultanates? Very interesting part of history it would especially be beautiful to watch with your editing style

Excellent presentation, thank you so much

Nice video. Just some feed bacK: I think I prefer the usual animations that you usually do as opposed to this new format. I find the animations, maps etc. much more engaging.

Salutations to Imam Husain ibn Ali who sacrificed his life to safeguard the true spirit of the faith. Even after 1400 years, the King of Martyrs still rules the hearts of all humans. Islam Zinda hota hai Har Karbala ke baad……..

@middleeastrenwarriormen1017

9 ай бұрын

Muhammed Ibn Qasim conqueror of Al Hind/India The Umayyad commander Qutayba Ibn Muslim conqueror of Transoxiana The Umayyad Commander Tareq Ibn Ziyad conqueror of Andalus/Spain The Umayyad commander

@agellidmalik

9 ай бұрын

_O you who hopes in Hussain during distress-_ _do you hope in one who was struck with Karbala?_ _For if Hussain was indeed able to rescue-_ _then he would have rescued himself from the tight situation (Karbala)_ _So leave the one prone to calamity and seek rescue from the Guardian (Allah)-_ _He (Alone) rescues from calamity and erases distress_ An exerpt from an Arabic poem on Tawheed

@alisajidhusain2701

9 ай бұрын

O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most RIGHTEOUS of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted.” [Quran: Chapter 49: Verse 13]

@alisajidhusain2701

9 ай бұрын

Is not winning and changing hearts of people better than conquest of territories ?

@agellidmalik

9 ай бұрын

@@alisajidhusain2701 The Prophet ﷺ did both, so both are good.

Any primary sources for your starting point concerning conversion or even presence of Mu'awiyah in Mecca?

Very informative video ! Thank you.

Found your channel like a week ago, and ive been listening and listening. Very interesting, i just have to keep up with all the names thrown out in the videos lol

@AlMuqaddimahYT

9 ай бұрын

Glad you found it. Yeah, the names are tough to keep track of. Which is why I sometimes omit names of figures but people get mad if I don't mention certain figures. Anyhow, that's why I put the names on the screen.

@garsplittah9549

9 ай бұрын

@AlMuqaddimahYT Awesome job akh, I'm even thinking about donating..curious as to what those cool perks are ha. Already my favorite KZread channel

We need your explanation for the whole Umayyad era politically and economically which is vague I think... Thanks for the enlightenment

@RelaxNationTV

9 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/pJ9qtK6kc9HOZcY.html

@tjbergren

9 ай бұрын

I agree. Also, religiously vague. I tend to attribute that to the Abbasid narrative that worked to eliminate the Umayyad narrative.

Every time I watch your videos, I'm impressed by the amount of information you bring out and the detail you get into. This is currently my favourite channel for Islamic history (and the history of Islam!).

Good video that went through the essentials.

this was your best video, maturely discussing one of the most contentious historical figures EVER, kudos

I m speechless to how good the content is. This is far more greater content than before. thx so much brother. May Allah rewards you

Love your videos, really well done and informative, thank you!

Very well made video, balanced and insightful

@RS-zt5zj

8 ай бұрын

Balanced my ass

Thanks for your videos Pls make a full playlist per khilafah

Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, "(During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire." Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 2812 In-book reference : Book 56, Hadith 28 USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 4, Book 52, Hadith 67 (deprecated numbering scheme)

@flint8173

9 ай бұрын

shia detected - you blame Muawiyah R.A for a single Umayyad's action. And then you whine when Non-Muslims judge Islam based on few bad Muslims. The hypocrisy. May Allah guide you shias

@realstudioabc3878

9 ай бұрын

so?

@realstudioabc3878

9 ай бұрын

Did Muawiyah R.A take life of Ammar R.A personally or did he order that? No.

@realstudioabc3878

9 ай бұрын

@munnamobile6079 Musnad Ahmad? Do you even know the grade? Reference? Isnad? Legal commentaries?

@realstudioabc3878

9 ай бұрын

@munnamobile6079 ur books show that Ali R.A doesn't respect Hamza R.A on how he just said "Hamza" laanat on you

Very very well researched and useful . Much needed content!

whatta great content, i am impressed

Amazing narration!

Great video. At a time like this, it's important to reference your sources. Thanks and kudos.

What Abubakr and Omar achieved as leaders after the death of Prophet SAW when almost whole of Arabia apostatized was extraordinary remarkable. Ali as compare to the two aforementioned Caliphs was not politically capable and his failure in handling successfully the post Othman era which was far less challenging than the period Abubakr inherited is a testimony to the capabilities of Abubakr & Omar. Omar was the chief advisor and architect behind every decision Abubakr made during his Caliphate. Caliphate in Islam is decided by people, and there was no way Ali could have got elected above Abubakr & Omar, though Ali had to his advantage the blood relationship to Prophet and Prophet’s only surviving daughter (Fatima) was his wife. Ali himself was a remarkable person in his own way but the two closest advisors to Prophet and the two most respectable men after Prophet and the two who were groomed to lead after Prophet, the two who had acceptability among not just Prophet’s Companions but around Arabia were none but Abubakr and Omar. Even during Prophets life there are many instances that showed their special place… in the battle of Uhud, if one recalls the dialogue between Abi-Sufyan & Muslims, he enquired about Prophet (he was confirming about the rumor that Prophet has been martyred) & immediately after Prophet he asked about Abubakr & Omar? That shows the hierarchy among Muslims, even Kuffar Quraish knew the importance of Abubakr and Omar. And finally, when Al-Abbas the Prophet’s uncle suggested Ali to get anything in favor for himself as Prophet might not survive this illness, Ali wasn’t confident & refused to go to Prophet to seek for his nomination for leadership position (Caliph). Ali said that Prophet’s refusal to appoint him may take away any little chance he may have in future to assume or to get elected/ appointed as a Caliph. In summary; Ali had all the credentials to be first Caliph like all other very senior Companions had, but he wasn’t the best for this job in the eyes of them while Abubakr & Omar were still alive. Who are we now after 1450 years to judge the decisions made by Prophet’s Companions and specially when their decisions (of appointing Abubakr & later Omar) were the most successful of decisions in human history!

@skepticalbaby7300

9 ай бұрын

The caliph was never chosen by the people. They were either chosen by a small group or designated by the reigning caliph. U r making up a rule that never existed. The fact is that there was a question of succession. The companions didn't even agree that there should be one successor. Some Ansari argued that there should be one for them and another for the muhajirun. Ali's claim was that he had been designated by the Prophet (sas) so the opinion of the companions would have been irrelevant anyway. It's useless to argue the counterfactual that Ali would have been a worse caliph than Abu Bakr as if u know how Ali would have done. Isn't that knowledge that only belongs to Allah? All I say is that if Ali could accept (by not rebelling) the authority of the first three caliph, then who am I to raise an issue now?

@omerasadshaik6426

9 ай бұрын

@@skepticalbaby7300 Ali never claimed he was designated by Prophet and if that were the case he would never have agreed and accepted his predecessors and wouldn’t have served under them. And we suggesting such a thing which he never claimed is a sin. And the hundreds & thousands of Companions who believed in the last Prophet & Quran and fought and died for him would ever have accepted anything short of Ali’s Caliphate IF prophet had nominated him. We tarnish the Iman of all Companions by creating a lie that never existed. The Caliphs were not elected by people directly as the elections are conducted today but consultations were done with all parties among Sabiqoon Al Awwaloon Minal Muhajiroon & Ansar and they all were agreed upon by vas majority. If any one person whom Prophet indirectly suggested was Abubakr as he didn’t allowed anyone else to lead prayers except him. Ali had the desire and there is nothing wrong and he knew that his chances were slim. And it was he who pushed the name of Omar as second Caliph. Ali got his chance though the situation was challenging and he made it tough by his certain decisions and he wasn’t politically successful. The humongous challenges Abubakr faced when he assumed the office of Caliphate was far much tougher & challenging and every decision he took was successful to an extent that he & later Omar became the standard on which all the later Islamic rulers were measured. It is not that Ali didn’t get a chance, he got it and he is considered the rightly guided Caliph. Though his political decisions at times questionable but his Iman, Taqwa, Tawakkul, ILM, ADL…. are among the best and he belongs to highest echelons of the Companions. Your conclusion said it all. Ali didn’t rebel because he was never nominated by Prophet and none was nominated. He served under the three predecessors with integrity and it was due to their sacrifice and success we are Muslims today! Who are we to question today who should have been the first Caliph while we live in a time with enough challenges of our own and we are struggling to survive let alone perform!

@skepticalbaby7300

9 ай бұрын

@omerasadshaik6426 The designation in question is that of ghadeer khumm. And Ali did refer to it after his ascension to be Khalifa. However, the sahabah differed on whether it was a designation of succession as they would differ on many things. It is not a question of emaan, but reasonable differences in interpretation. Besides, it is not necessary for Ali to have made the claim. Abu Bakr never stated his claim to the Khalifa. Umar pressed Abu Bakr's case. Will u now say that Abu Bakr's claim to the Khalifa is non-historical because he never expressed the claim? Ur history is incorrect. All of the muhajirun were not at saqifah. The reliable reports only confirm that Abu Bakr, Umar, and Abu Ubaydah were there. We know this because the Banu Hashim refused to accept the result and Umar went through Medina to get their oath of allegience. If everyone was there, then why would he have to go through Medina? There was no vote on candidates. Umar simply grabbed Abu Bakr's hand, pledged allegiance, and encouraged others to follow. That is not an election with competing candidates. And even if u term it an election, ur claim that it is a rule if false because neither Abu Bakr nor Umar repeated the process. Indeed, Umar called Saqifa a "falta" meaning a rushed, ill-conceived event. And that is why it was not repeated. And u are wrong that Abu bakr was the only one the Prophet (sas) ever designated to lead the prayer. Numerous others had been designated to lead the prayer in the past. Will u now argue that they were designated by the Prophet (sas)? That's ridiculous. In your effort to explain why the Ummah was correct in the selection of Abu Bakr and Umar, u disparage Ali. U lift up Abu Bakr and Umar, but tear down Ali. Why? U have repeatedly stated that such and such remarks denigrate the Sahabah. But u are the one highlighting Ali's flaws and claiming that he could never do this or that. U are the one ranking the Sahabah and placing one over the other 1400 years after the fact. It is divisive and u should really examine why u feel it is necessary.

@snakejuce

8 ай бұрын

Spot on.

@abdullahassaffah

4 ай бұрын

Nothing you said is referenced and reliable contains some truth mixed with false and exegeration

I loooove your channel 🙌♥️🙌♥️ i learn a lot with each video 🙌🙏🙏🙏 thank you syavash 🙏 🙌🇮🇷🙌

Another important point ☝️ which you have raised that is that Hussain ibn Ali didn't had supporters but the fact is imam Hussain was the cheif of banu Hashim tribe one of the wealthiest clan of hejaz and several tribes of iraq and hejaz supported imam Hussain only. Hussain stood up for the re establishment of the rashidun Caliphate. And rashidun Caliphate was Caliphate were caliphs were elected by a higher Advisory committee. Muawiyah carried out the development works for the Syrian people because it was his power base and he especially ignored iraq and hejaz and was involved in the killing of notable companions of the prophet Muhammad. His reign was peaceful just because of imam Hasan's peace treaty with him .

@ALI-om2re

9 ай бұрын

Uthman was chosen over Ali (as) because Ali (as) rejected to rule the way Umar and Abu Bakr ruled. Where do you come up with Hussain (as) ibn Ali wanted to rule like the previous caliphs?

@mdarquamali1484

9 ай бұрын

​@@ALI-om2re When I have told Hussain ibn Ali wanted to rule. Syawish said that Hussain didn't had supporters. I was telling him the fact that he had supporters. Around 25,000 people in kufa gave their alligience to imam Hussain and several people from other parts of the state also supported imam Hussain. But as curfew was imposed by ubaydullah ibn ziyad in kufa the things went wrong.

@mdarquamali1484

9 ай бұрын

​@@ALI-om2reI never said Hussain demanded the Caliphate. The mission of imam was to re establish the rashidun Caliphate through a revolution.

@ALI-om2re

9 ай бұрын

@@mdarquamali1484 what I’m trying to say is Ahlul-Bayt (as) at its core didn’t believe in the Caliphate of the first three caliphs as it’s well documented. So Hussain ibn Ali (as) wasn’t trying to re-establish that system. And of course I’m Shia and your probably Sunni so we have our different views but I’ve never seen a Sunni say that Hussain (as) wanted to establish that system of caliphate in it self or any proof being provided for that. Anyways there’s so much more I want to add but gotta go to a majlis .. take care

@omaraboal-azm8705

9 ай бұрын

The chief of the hashimites was Abd Allah ibn al-Abbas not imam hussiyn

It's good to see you, mate. Students in my history courses have heard your voice many times! I assign your videos on Islamic history.

Muawiyah was really the first Islamic emperor he was even called the Khosrau of the Arabs by medieval muslim historians. From now on I will call him (Muawiyah the great).

@Warlock786

9 ай бұрын

May the Lanath of Allah be on Muaiwya and Inshallah you will rise with him on the day of judgement.

Hey what happened to your original video on the Prophet?

Can u make a video about malacca malay Sultanate?

*MOLA HAZRAT IMAM HUSSEIN RADIALLAHU ANHU*

@RelaxNationTV

9 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/pJ9qtK6kc9HOZcY.html

I think the real moral is that Muawiyah's accession simply served to shock people, then and now, out of the conception that the rightful party will be victorious, victory belonged to the party who has the elements of victory (like political accumen and strategy) Sort of what we felt when Ned Stark died.

Salam bro really appreciate u r work 🙌🙌 , your name is so unique whats its orrigin bro .

A minor point, you keep referring to the modern equivalent of regions incorrectly, e.g. "Acre, Israel". Please use the "Acre, Occupied Palestine" instead. Thanks

Wow! Thank you, Brother Syawish. I can't wait for your video of Abdul Malik ibn Marwan including his controversial general, Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf. Salam from Indonesia 🇮🇩

@RelaxNationTV

9 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/pJ9qtK6kc9HOZcY.html

@shahsadsaadu5817

9 ай бұрын

Didn't know people used the word "controversial " instead of "evil"

@coffe2270

7 ай бұрын

@@shahsadsaadu5817he’s the scribe of revelation you are calling him evil?

dude, PLEASE keep making the content you make, i know it probably takes a hell ton of effort but it's garaunteed that you'll get hella popular some day, these videos are so underrated

U r awesome...yur way of talking...nd the info on religion islam is being told in such an interesting manner...i cant stop watcing this channel as a religion theology enthusiast

Stop calling Mu'awiyah as a Caliph, he was not a Caliph He was Sultan of Umayyad Caliphate

As a Sunni Muslim, I fully support Ali (ra).

@user-xq6xu3fo8c

8 ай бұрын

Love you brother ❤

@user-wr9dh6yv1o

8 ай бұрын

Taqiyyah 😂😂😂😂

@karimmezghiche9921

8 ай бұрын

​@@user-wr9dh6yv1othat is not a thing in Sunni Islam

Hey from Australia mate! I love your stuff, and often listen to videos while out walking my dog. Are you able to enable background play on these videos? KZread is telling me I can't listen to it only, think it's because it's a membership only video and perhaps they have seperate settings

@AlMuqaddimahYT

9 ай бұрын

That could be because it's not publicly up yet. It will be tomorrow.

@AlMuqaddimahYT

9 ай бұрын

Also, I'm gonna need photos of your dog. Email them to me, please.

@theepicone1

9 ай бұрын

@@AlMuqaddimahYT amazing mate. I'll send some in the field listening to Al Muqaddimah pics tomorrow

@Avihosia

9 ай бұрын

​@@AlMuqaddimahYT😊😂

Ibn Khaldun was the REAL Al-Muqaddimah, not just that OTHER ONE!

@AlMuqaddimahYT

9 ай бұрын

I concede that.

Machiavelli to Mu'awiyah : well i just wanna say that i'm a huge fan

I rarely give thumbs up, but this video is an exception, a nice historical perspective and those citations are really good for us who wants to know more

@RS-zt5zj

8 ай бұрын

Its not a historical perspective, its a salafi perspective.

@jassimarsingh6505

3 күн бұрын

@@RS-zt5zj ok mr rafidi

People were dissatisfied with his reign except the people of Syria. The people didn't revolted during his reign was because there was a clause in Hasan Muawiyah peace treaty that Muawiyah will leave matter of appointment of the news Caliph in the hands of the consultative assembly of Ansar and muhajirun. But he appointed his son. All the clauses of that treaty were violated and people were looking for an imam who would overthrow this corrupt regime. That's why people from hejaz and iraq reguraly visted imam Hussain. And as a result after his death people revolted and at the end which led to the establishment of Abdullah ibn zubair s' Caliphate.

@laughup7055

9 ай бұрын

Where can I read more about it?

@nuraldinal-shebane4713

9 ай бұрын

poeple always ll find resons to revolt they revolt aginst othman and aginst ali so do u think them rule crupted caliphat .

@Melia_67

9 ай бұрын

If people of Hejaz supported Hussien then why did he had to go to Iraq for their support? Do you think we are fools here? Read about Arab and Islamic history very well before talking nonsense.

@iamthepostman6062

8 ай бұрын

@@Melia_67 lanat on yazeed and his followers for killing prophets grandsons

@Ibrahim.l20

8 ай бұрын

Muawiyah looked and saw that choosing his son woudlve been best due to certain reasons. he thought that if he didnt do that there will be fitnah and fitnah is worse than death

your history channel is awesome!!!! lokks like you have studied it pretty well . good work keep it up.

Bruh no one gonna talk about the sudden 'Acre, Israel' that popped up at 6:46? it's called Akka, Palestine. I expect nothing less but accuracy and responsibility towards the Palestinian cause from a channel like this.

Our religion is devine but our history is human

@bagavondo2477

9 ай бұрын

what about our future? is it divine or human?

@shahriar4706

9 ай бұрын

​@@bagavondo2477a bit of both

@bagavondo2477

9 ай бұрын

@@shahriar4706 for example: our religion is human but our history is divine. can we say religion is divine when it was fabricated by human? does that makes us human divine? who are we?

@thewarlock539

9 ай бұрын

​@@wisewisdom7879looooool

@voi_16

9 ай бұрын

If you will watch Christian Prince and his debates with muslims you will see that islam is manmade religion. He proves that with islamic sources, such as the sunnah and hadiths within it.

Narrated Abu Hurairah: that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "Rejoice, 'Ammar, the transgressing party shall kill you." Grade: Sahih (Darussalam) Reference : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3800 In-book reference : Book 49, Hadith 200 English translation : Vol. 1, Book 46, Hadith 3800

@muhammadsyed5496

9 ай бұрын

Abu Hurairah has narrated so many hadith so instrumental for islam

@tabishshafi1959

9 ай бұрын

It was khawariz that matryed him

@ammarahsan2157

9 ай бұрын

My namesake, Ammar

@aurangzeabmalik1833

9 ай бұрын

@@tabishshafi1959 Each of the two horsemen who had assisted Abul Ghadiya in killing ‘Ammar were trying to take from Mu'awiya the prize which had been fixed for the head of ‘Ammar. 'Amr As said to both of them: "You two are fighting for the Fire of Hell and nothing else! I have heard the Prophet (S) saying: "One who kills ‘Ammar and one who takes his clothes off his body will both go to Hell!" Mu'awiya interrupted Amr As and said in a reproachful tone: “What you are saying is a dangerous jest. These two persons are fighting on our side and you are telling them that both of them will go to Hell!" Amr said: “I swear by Allah that this is a fact and you also know it. I wish that I had died twenty years earlier than today.”

@7838881411

9 ай бұрын

@@tabishshafi1959so you mean to say Team Muawiya were Khawarij along with Mubafiq as well?

If I have to choose between Ali and Muawiya ..I will always side with Ali.

@Kuazdaq

9 ай бұрын

No one deny that but Muawiyah is also a great Muslim king and a sahabi

@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273

9 ай бұрын

In that period of time (ali caliphate period) No one will deny that every one side with ali, after his death and transfer the caliph to muawiya no one should object him in that period

@anasshaikh132

9 ай бұрын

@@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273 I consider him the first muslim King and sahabi not the Caliph and it's a known fact that he usurped the caliphate from Hasan

@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273

9 ай бұрын

@@anasshaikh132 yes his first muslim king and Caliphate as idea of agreement of all muslims Of course his rule and rest of caliphate after him to Ottoman is not something to be compare to rashidun caliphates People need to distinguish between them

The contents of the script deserve to be published in an academic journal.

6:48 Isreal ???? Brother beware , its Palestine

@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273

9 ай бұрын

I agreed i think copy in paste on video from Google picture

@LoudWaffle

9 ай бұрын

It's a modern picture. Or you think the city looked like that and we had aerial coloured cameras back during Mu'awiyah's time?

@hussein2043ppppp

9 ай бұрын

@@LoudWaffle My problem is with the rhetoric ,we should not be using normalization rhetoric, calling the land Israel is normalization with the existence of israel. Because as anti-zionists ( which every muslim should be) we believe that israel is not a legitimate state , rather a force of occupation and imperialism on the land of Palestine. And we should avoid every form of normalization with it , including rhetoric.

@LoudWaffle

9 ай бұрын

@@hussein2043ppppp You should spend less time policing others and worrying about inconsequential things

@hussein2043ppppp

9 ай бұрын

@@LoudWaffle The devil is in the details my friend. Thanks for the tip, rest assured that I manage my time well , I hope you do the same also since you been worrying about my comments.

I don't know why you didn't mentioned that muawayah was a companion of the prophet peace be upon him and was a writer of wahi "revelation"

@izaynkhalid

4 ай бұрын

He was not the writer of revelations but just merely a munshi. because his father asked the Prophet to do so and Prophet agreed.

This production further expands that Sunni Islam is built on empires and conquers and not religion.

@Foshoo1

9 ай бұрын

What's a Sunni Islam? How is that difference then other Islam, I thought Islam is same, both worship same god and consider prophet Muhammad (saw) as their prophet.

@ALI-om2re

9 ай бұрын

@@Foshoo1 Yes but after the Prophet (s) passed away, the community leaned on certain concepts which ultimately created a big enough wedge (lots of blood) that crystallized into different sects.

Man, it is always a lovely day when Siyavish uploads a video.

Mu’awiyah is a companion of the prophet and sister to the prophet's wife, he was a great man and a good caliph.

@greenvox

9 ай бұрын

He accepted Islam after the conquest of Mecca so he wasn’t a companion. He abused his sister Ummul Momineen Umm Habiba R.A, and made up narrations citing he alleged “greatness” when he wanted people to think he was on par with Ali R.A. He was an absolutely wretched person responsible for the killing of the prophet SAW’s family.

@amori11100

9 ай бұрын

​@@greenvox WOW, brother you are entitled to your opinion but let me respond to your remarks and hope to understand why I love all companions: 1- A companion is anyone who accepted Islam and accompanied the prophet which Mu’awiyah did. Many Sahaba accepted Islam after the conquest of Makkah like عكرمة بن ابي جهل و صفوان بن خلف and those are companions. 2- He never abused his sister and there are no confirmed details about that, in fact she visited Mu’awiyah in Damascus during his reign. 3- Ali was better than him and we all now that, but it does not mean that he was not a musilm or great leader. They both had a different approach of hoe to handle Othman's killers. 4- Mu’awiyah and Ali were first cousin and both family to the prophet and he did not kill the prophet's family. 5- Mu’awiyah is the founder of the dynasty of the Ummayad caliphate which is the largest Arab - Islamic empire in history. Mu’awiyah was a great leader and shroud politician who unified the Ummah and spread Islam and defeated the romans.

@user-wr9dh6yv1o

8 ай бұрын

​@@amori11100shia mushriks

An excellent video from a very balanced perspective.

I like your work and your video, but why do you have this background music? It obstructs your really helpful words.

I thought Ali protecting or not punishing Uthman's assassins didn't sound right, so looked it up and apparently he was killed by a mob of thousands of people. I think you could've gone into a bit more detail there. It seems important.

The nasibis will keep on defending Banu umayah till the appearance of Masih Al dajjal.

Did you have to do it in Muharram?

@Melia_67

9 ай бұрын

yes, cry about it, Does my name scare you too?

@Warlock786

9 ай бұрын

People will do anything to get a few views.

At last found one nonpartisan good narrator of our history.

muawiyad should be given the title of Destroyer of true islamic caliphate not ameer ul mominin

3 of the 4 expansive Caliphate fronts were halted by Turks ; Khazars in Caucasus, Turgesh& Turk Shahis & Göktürks in Central Asia, Bulgars (allied with Romans) in Thrace

@blacksheep6174

9 ай бұрын

Thrace ? They never even tried to invade Thrace there was no border . Khazars in Caucasus Turks in central Asia Gurjara in India Franks in Galia Byzantine in Anatolia

@starcapture3040

9 ай бұрын

they were all defeated

@agellidmalik

9 ай бұрын

Are you one of those atheist Turks who hates Islam and only look up to the pagan history of the Turks?

@miracleyang3048

9 ай бұрын

@@starcapture3040 Yeah sure taking Syria and Egypt then being stopped at Anatolia is an arab defeat, Taking Transoxiana and being stopped at the Tarim basine is an Arab defeat

@starcapture3040

9 ай бұрын

@@miracleyang3048 back then turks didn't even exist, Arabs didn't who were the fu the turks are.

You gonna get so much love while doing it in Muharram!

Give respect to Muaviya and Ali, though they did battle both are Mujthahid and campanion of prophet.

Shukran Akhi ❤❤ 🇦🇹

Was the timing on purpose?

@alomaralsulaiman6501

9 ай бұрын

Why? What happened?

@hussainsultanzada6123

9 ай бұрын

yeah I swear haha. Man decides to release this on the Day of Ashura 😭

@ayubk2638

9 ай бұрын

@@alomaralsulaiman6501 today's the 10th of Muharram in the Islamic calendar, and on this day 765yrs ago, the Prophet ﷺ's grandson was killed by soldiers loyal to Yazid, the son of Muawiyah

@karimradwan2200

9 ай бұрын

​@@ayubk2638bruh wtf💀. Go read History the shias of Kufa betrayed Al Hussain and Killed him. Even Mohammed Al Baker ( 5th Imam of Shia and Grandson of Al Hussain) Said that the Shia of Ali in Kufa Killed Al Hussain. Stop hating muawiya and yazid.

@alomaralsulaiman6501

9 ай бұрын

​@@ayubk2638oh I didn't notice that literally forgot about that event.

Just reading up on byzantine history but this guy should be considered up there with Hannibal and Atilla as one of the Roman's most dangerous adversaries

Nice and useful video, but why the Indian music in the background?

Editing is 🔥🔥

the Umayyad Caliphate coincides with modern day Syria due to the capital being at Damascus. similar to the Abbasid Caliphate coinciding with modern Iraq due to Baghdad being it's capital.

@barrymoore4470

9 ай бұрын

Those regions were the respective centers of power for both regimes, but the polities being ruled were much larger--the Umayyad and Abbasid Caliphates were indeed empires.

aint no way bro uploaded this on the 9th of Muharam 💀

Splendid

This is off topic, but as a quick question why did the Muslim forces accept the jizyha at heliopolis, but not at the battle of yarmouk? It's my understanding that vahan offered gold and goods to have al whalid retreat. Thank you for your content and time.

Hazrat Ali (R.A) was the last & fourth guided caliphate of islam ans muslim... Since When Mu'awiyah become caliphate Mu'awiyah ?? I don't understand this...

*Sigh* People still forget that Ali was the last rightly guided Khalif amongst sunni's, and when he was still alive Mu'awiya was a rebel who fought against the 4th rightly guided Khalif, so think about that when you mock Shia's for the support of Ali and their hatred of Mu'awiya if you are sunni, By mocking them, you deny Ali being the 4th rightly guided Khalif by extention and insult your ancestors and the religion of Islam itself. This fight was a tragedy.

@zuhairasif8347

9 ай бұрын

Don't forget that the majority of Sunnis still hate Muawiya

@realstudioabc3878

9 ай бұрын

bro said mocking shias is kufr 💀 who do you think you are to judge righteous servants of Allah?

@realstudioabc3878

9 ай бұрын

and stop barking with falsehood

@blacksheep6174

9 ай бұрын

Yes but atleast we don't curse muaviyeh we still do consider him a Muslim and companion ruler of Syria .

@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273

9 ай бұрын

​@@blacksheep6174you know what i upset even more, they "shia" mock omar ibn kattab

When will make a video on Islam in west africa?

Thanks!

Great timing lol. Maybe do one on his son this time next year.

@AqeedaTV

9 ай бұрын

As a sunni Muslim my self this was very disrespectful from this guy. He will see what it rewards him very hurtful and what bad timing

I Just don’t understand why you would release this video today. Knowing it would cause divisive action and separate people. It’s not right and honestly makes me rethink how accurate and unbiased your other videos are. I’m saying this as someone who is not shia. Sometimes it’s better to just be respectful then to divide a community for viewership

@mdarquamali1484

9 ай бұрын

He is doing this for views despite knowing the fact tha Muawiyah's reign was corrupt and he killed several notable companion of the prophet of Islam. And these things are mentioned in the main stream hadith books.

@waveybooo

9 ай бұрын

you haven't even watched the video ???

@tesmith47

9 ай бұрын

The truth is...

@fatimasaksouk

9 ай бұрын

It's history

A new look at a puzzling period of Muslim history.

As a Sunni I will tell you we can’t teach our prophet Sahih al-Bukhari 2812 The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire."

What an extremely informative video. This is one of the best videos I have ever seen.

Perfect timing

time stamps would be nice

All comments aside, Muawiyah is one of the greatest geniuses of human history. As a Muslim, I’m grateful that he is part of the Islamic legacy.

@zz4357

16 күн бұрын

As a Sunni I can't credit muawiyyah with anything because of his battle zgainst hadhrath Ali and for appointing Yazid who killed imam hussain RA. No level of political success can excuse him for that.

@haristahir3472

7 күн бұрын

​@@zz4357 Hazrat Mu’awiyah R.A is a Sahaba a 'Katibin e Wahi and the son of Hazrat Abu Sifyan R.A .he was appointed by Caliph Abu Bakr as a deputy commander in the conquest of Syria. The Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) once prayed for Sayyidna Amir Muawiyah Bin Abi Sufyan (RA) like this: "O Allah ! Make him a leader of the people and make him a guide through whom the people might be guided." Source:"Ibne Asakir 16/684,686,Dahabee in Seyar al Ailam al Nubala 8/38, Musnad Shameen 190" Also Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said to Muawiyah (رضي الله عنه): “Allah, make him (Muawiya) guided, a guider, and guide people through him”. Source:[Imam Bukhari in Tareekh Al Kabeer 5/240, Sunan at-Tirmidhi, Shaykh Al-Albani Authenticated in (Sahih Tirmidhee 3/236)]

@idrisanimagac.4086

5 күн бұрын

@@zz4357 he fought Ali because of the killing of Uthuman and he could have never know that Yazid will turn like that May Allah be pleased with all the Sahabas 🤲🏾 and lets the owner of the day of judgement judge

My son's name is Mu'awiyah.

@cascarrabias397

9 ай бұрын

You are another one that pretends history can be twisted to fit the narrative of lies.

@alexander63736

9 ай бұрын

shameful

@user-bq5gk3go3z

9 ай бұрын

​@@alexander63736not at all

@TheMuslimApologist

8 ай бұрын

@@alexander63736 Shut up, Shia. I am proud of the fact that my son's name is the first Ummayad Caliph.

Az-Zubayr was the prophets ﷺ cousin from his aunt safiyya bint abd Al-Mutalib. He was also khaedejas nephew from her brother making me him first cousin with Fatima bint ‏محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم ❤

"Muawiya didn't take the caliphate state any where it wasn't going to ..!!" Such a quite strong statement along the lines of both state and religious affairs. For ill or good, the man is important for his divergence of the spirit of Madinah state and convergence to the pre- Muhammed tribal Mecca i.e. the organization of Qurish with an emphasis upon its major trading route with El-sham ( greater syria )

Ali ibn abi talib may allah be pleased with him wasn't away from the political and administrative manners of the rashidun caliphate, he acted as an advisor and decision maker in the reigns of the three caliphs before him and was on of the six people "Ahl a shura" which omar choose to succeed him

@Warlock786

9 ай бұрын

Not true. In the time of Abu Bakr he became a recluse because he was dissapointed in his so called friends. In the time of Umer he acted as an advisor on some occasions.

@abdullahassaffah

4 ай бұрын

​@@Warlock786no he didn't he even led the defense of madinah as general it was because of Ali radiallahuanhu advise Abu bakr radiallahuanhu continued the battles and wars

@Warlock786

4 ай бұрын

@@abdullahassaffah Not sure what you typed there it did'nt make much sense brother. But the theory that Ali AS was involved in decision making during the time of the 3 caliphs is very wrong. Every now and then he offered advice but that is about it. Brother.....the Caliphate was deliberately kept away from Bani Hashim by the Quraysh.....this is not a secret.

This man stripped Islam of its sole. Changed hadeeth to fit his imperial ambitions, and ruled Dae$s style, profiteering from war and carnage. The word Caliph means successor to the prophet leading in accordance with Islamic principles. This man was not principled. He was a machiavellian politician, but not machiavellian enough to create a sustainable kingdom. Machiavellianism isn't Islamic, the prophet wasn't machiavellian and this man wasn't a caliph to the prophet. Why glorify a man because he built am empire? It wasn't Islam's objective to create an empire. Islam spread organically throughout southeast Asia when decent peaceful Arabs visited for trade and showed a good example to their hosts. The right Caliph to the prophet would have done the same.

Similar analysis as Dr Israr Ahmed, Great work. Allah gets his work done in strange ways incomprehensible to the mortals. Also we need to keep history separate from Religion

How you explained the whole scenario during the civil war and succession of Yazid was brilliant. Instead pf going into individual narrations which might be biased or according to somebody's own perception and perspective, you covered the topic with insight. Thanks to you and thanks to Ibn e Khuldun for writing the masterpiece. I think to solve, it would be great if somebody having expertise in knowledge of narrations, review the individual narrations about them. And if this work has been done, it is needed to be publicized. You are doing great work by the way.