Big thanks to Ridge for sending me this wallet and supporting the channel! Kristen is cool ❤️😎 Here’s the site if you want to check them out! > ridge.com/AMAZINGVIZ Use Code “AMAZINGVIZ ” for 10% off your order MY PRECIOUS ! 😁😁

@Klarcrowe

3 жыл бұрын

Another nice video again. Can you make a video about submarines?

@gesundheitlicht2054

3 жыл бұрын

@@Klarcrowe good Idea

@vp5968

3 жыл бұрын

7:45 song name pls

@Apocalypse0505hun

3 жыл бұрын

Correction: M46, M47,M48 were not MBTs, those were heavy tanks. The first real MBT of the US were the M1 Abrams. Also T-80 has nothing to do with T-64, It's a completely new design, like later the T-90 has nothing to do with T-72. 8:50... Thats a Leo2A5 not an A7+ you can easily distinct them by looking at the gun... The A5 has the shorter L/44 while the other variants from A6 have the L/55 longer barrel. :) Also didn't see that first time, the Merkavas always had 120mm cannons, not 125mm. The 125mm caliber mostly used in eastern vehicles. Like russian, chinese etc.

@vp5968

3 жыл бұрын

@Lap Lap Ricky Fung ?

I didn't know that ridge wallets was one of the best main battle tanks

@randomt-9034

3 жыл бұрын

It can withstand ATGMs, HEAT

@kali7148

3 жыл бұрын

never knew ridge wallets were a fourth generation MBT made in 2018? Damn man catch up in your history...

@bryanmartinez6600

3 жыл бұрын

Very low profile design

@TheMadVulpen

3 жыл бұрын

Dont forget the active protection systems it has installed

@kali7148

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheMadVulpen yep who can forget about that?

Tanks before: Tall Tanks Now: WIDE

@teranovski

3 жыл бұрын

wider and smaller-better stability and lower silhuete- usually better mobility and harder to hit.

@heheboi6693

3 жыл бұрын

Ticc tonk

@claude5520

3 жыл бұрын

Nothing is taller than the kv2

@RunesUnruined

3 жыл бұрын

You mean W I D E

@lightoneday8923

3 жыл бұрын

@@claude5520 Are you sure about that.

Man I remember serving in the American Army And seeing my troops operate in the Ridge Wallet and honestly it bounces shots because of it’s Titanium armor and great camo...

@KingdomRepublic

Жыл бұрын

It might even have depleted Uranium armour like the Abrams 🤣

@saurabhkanhere7033

Жыл бұрын

For the JEWS

The most feared MBT is a tank I drew when I was bored in school with a 256mm main gun.

@chaosdude0878

3 жыл бұрын

Im pretty sure what you drew wasnt a tank, its a Battleship gun on a set of tracks

@VietnamWarSummarized

2 жыл бұрын

lol

@theoneandonly4577

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂

@slayer8actual

2 жыл бұрын

The tank I drew in elementary school had 4 main guns and so many machine guns it looked like a porcupine. And the track had spikes for running over the enemy. The only problem it had was could only fire the length of a standard sheet of notebook paper and usually in a high arc. It was still underdevelopment when I went to middle school.

@TheoHawk316

2 жыл бұрын

how much armor could it penetrate? XD

Smart Ass comment of the day: The M60 was never officially designated "Patton"

@akrepiidfiresupportvehicle2289

3 жыл бұрын

Wait really??

@pimmelschilz9728

3 жыл бұрын

@@akrepiidfiresupportvehicle2289 the official designation was 105mm Gun Full Tracked Combat Tank M60. Patton Was widely used to it's descendancy of the m47 and m48.

@akrepiidfiresupportvehicle2289

3 жыл бұрын

@@pimmelschilz9728 Thanks for the information

@Itsshaunbewarned

3 жыл бұрын

U mean the M60 machine gun?

@akrepiidfiresupportvehicle2289

3 жыл бұрын

@@Itsshaunbewarned The M60A3

The M1A3 is almost ready to move into prototype phase and, from what I heard, the the thing that impressed me so much is that there is so much digital wiring in the M1 that switching from conventional to fiber optic cables they removed 3 TONS of weight.

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

yet they planned to replaced the Abrams with submitting 4 different designs

@MrLeovdmeer

2 жыл бұрын

Nothing special on that tank. Same gun.

@mikefowler301

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrLeovdmeer Yep, seems to work okay in combat.

@gae_wead_dad_6914

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrLeovdmeer Yep. What's your point? Big guns have been outphased since the invention of SABOT rounds.

@cdc194

2 жыл бұрын

@@Kalashnikov413 those design are light tanks for Infantry support to compliment the Stryker in mechanized units. One of the requirements was that it be capable of transport on a C130, no main battle tank is anywhere close to that light.

Why is Bob Semple tank not number 1?

@uk8055

3 жыл бұрын

It is a ww2 tank not a mbt tank. But I still like it too.

@user-bu4yq9px5y

3 жыл бұрын

If the video was titled most feared tanks, Bob semple would be number one tho. Probably. In contest with the tsar tank and the Tonk.

@loneneotank.5687

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-bu4yq9px5y I WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION

@_zarp_3963

3 жыл бұрын

@@loneneotank.5687 bonjour

@klaushauschen

3 жыл бұрын

Your pfp seens kinda gay

8:35 "And that kids, is why the Chinese government is hunting us down"

@not_autistic_336

3 жыл бұрын

laughs in quality*

@kumartalla7216

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@Duckbomba

3 жыл бұрын

I died of laughter when I saw that ngl he had it coming

5:51 merkava mkIII made by south korea? What?

@Alexander_Snowden

3 жыл бұрын

Perhaps that’s some kind of reference, as at least one of the tankers is Korean.

@yellomonky4272

3 жыл бұрын

@@Alexander_Snowden most definitely not. That is a simple mishap. They would not make the country that built the tank Korea from one tanker. If he was impressive, it would most likely be put in the description below.

@yellomonky4272

3 жыл бұрын

@@p8newood377 hard to understand who you are saying that to. Please elaborate

There are so many "best tanks in the world" i'm impressed..

@emirteimouri7150

2 жыл бұрын

LEOPARD 2A7+ IS BEST

@toastius9939

2 жыл бұрын

@@emirteimouri7150 Bob semple is better

@emirteimouri7150

2 жыл бұрын

@@toastius9939 XDDDD

@Mateyhv1

2 жыл бұрын

World is so riddled of best tanks it has turned into a shit

@Cristian88.

Жыл бұрын

@@Mateyhv1 when every one is the best, everyone is also the worst lol

The mighty Armata T-14! Striking fear into anyone who has to keep a parade through Red Square to schedule.

@zeroomicron4821

Жыл бұрын

Ha Ha

@JediTev

Жыл бұрын

Another Russian lollipop waiting to happen! 😂🤣😂🤣

8:07 I have a 120mm smoothbore cannon, not a 125mm smoothbore cannon, the cannon also looks a little too small

@dominicgorriceta6487

3 жыл бұрын

True, and the Arjun Mk II tho. I remember the Challenger 2 weighs 84 tons while the Arjun weighs 16 tons less like wtf man. Since when was the Arjun the heaviest MBT when we have the Challenger 2 Edit: I actually realized that the Challenger has Add on armor so if you remove that armor, it weighs less than the Arjun so yea the Indian is heavier. But a Challenger thats fully battle ready, equipped with its add on armor makes it even more heavier so yea.

@waningspectrum7709

3 жыл бұрын

@@dominicgorriceta6487 and the Arjun has a rifled gun and not smoothbore

@officerbucket7986

3 жыл бұрын

I think all the of the tanks in this have small looking guns

@AusTankieGaming

3 жыл бұрын

@@dominicgorriceta6487 From memory Challenger 2 combat weight is just shy of 83 tons with the complete addon armour package. The Arjun (max) weight rating is documented as 71 tons (I'm assuming that would be a combat rating as well C/W addon armour).

@dominicgorriceta6487

3 жыл бұрын

@@AusTankieGaming yea the Brit is heavier than the Indian with all that armor

8:42 I see what you did there

@thefollowerofislam1329

3 жыл бұрын

ye

@bautistahernandezfernandoa85

3 жыл бұрын

Winnie Poop

@rene0115

3 жыл бұрын

@@bautistahernandezfernandoa85 China are you leady?

@eddamien5087

2 жыл бұрын

Your execution date is tomorrow

@vojtakkojecky7765

Жыл бұрын

Last time i saw 99a was getting deapthroat by abrams

Difficult to assess tanks, as many have never seen action. It's odd to take the likes of the Chieftain and the Centurion, and rank them equally or below other tanks that use the same gun or are variants of the aforementioned, especially when those other tanks haven't seen combat. There are a lot of 'paper tigers' on this list, and hopefully the tanks and their crews will never have to prove otherwise.

@richardm3023

3 жыл бұрын

Centurion saw a lot of action in Israeli service. They held the line at the Golan Heights in '73 against Soviet made JS II/III and T-54/55 tanks.

@cluelessclown

2 жыл бұрын

One in particular has a spent a good bit of time whipping a few asses on this list.

@mikefowler301

2 жыл бұрын

I do agree! paper tigers.

@RokkieSparrow

Жыл бұрын

@@richardm3023 you mean the IS 2 and 3?

@richardm3023

Жыл бұрын

@@RokkieSparrow same thing. Joseph Stalin/ ioseph Stalin. Are you really going to split hairs about English or Cyrillic spelling?

The M1A2 Abrams does not have an automatic loader

@stormthegiant8018

3 жыл бұрын

Yes it does! His name is Steve and he likes long walks on the beach! ;)

You forgot the most op of tanks . . . The random lego brick. Or that "stealth tank" no one seems to know about.

@derrickstorm6976

3 жыл бұрын

I wish I could say I didn't see this coming...

@TheMadVulpen

3 жыл бұрын

Well thats the point of the stealth tank, to be stealthy and unkown

@tomendruweit9386

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheMadVulpen yeah, I wonder why he did not make that joke (sarkasam)

@konigstiger9489

3 жыл бұрын

Tiger I

@non-existant958

3 жыл бұрын

PL-01?

The most feared tank ? Probably the one closest to you with its pea shooter pointed at your nose ...

@buckberthod5007

2 жыл бұрын

Eh. Tanks really ain't that good against ground forces. Not that hard to lay to a trap, blow the tracks off. The challenge really is getting the hatches open to get to the crew to neutralize them. If you can pop a CS or tear gas grenade down the barrel, you may have a chance of smoking them out, but being that they have a sealed breach that wouldn't work to well. But if you pop a thermite grenade down the tube, and get the hell out of the way, it should in theory "cook" the shell off, at the very least destroying the main gun and very possibly the crew. Or use it to melt through the hatch and go to work. Tanks are only a problem for entrenched guns and other vehicles and tanks.

@rochitgurung9090

2 жыл бұрын

@@buckberthod5007 its not that simple

@Alexander_Hodge

Жыл бұрын

@@rochitgurung9090 Dude is waffling. While setting the trap you get blasted into smithereens by a 120mm shell. Or hosed down by a .50

most feared tank : Me walking to bedroom making noise of my large foot

@hdezn26

3 жыл бұрын

Actually, its that random lego brick, laying on the floor. High stealth value , good damage output, comes in all shapes and colors.

@TheMadVulpen

3 жыл бұрын

*You cant unfeet the lettuce*

@XylonV1

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheMadVulpen Bruh were both roblox plane crazy ytbers.

@XylonV1

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheMadVulpen u were here to make a new tutorial lmao , i made p1000 ratte but mini , well i make some various tutorials , my latest is katyusha tutorial

@TheMadVulpen

3 жыл бұрын

@@XylonV1 no, I got my own list of requests lol

Any Tank is fearsome. Just depends what you're armed with and how exposed you are.

@jotabe1984

2 жыл бұрын

yea i was thinking about just that... against a bunch of dudes only armed with an AK-47 every Tank is lethal Put a couple of RPG-7 or Karl Gustav at close range (300 to 500m) and unupgraded 1st gen design will have trouble. Put an ATM like a Javelin at 1000m and 2nd gen MBTs will have trouble Put a Froogfoot or a Warthog in the air and even modern MBT will have trouble

@Seb-Storm

Жыл бұрын

@@jotabe1984 i know this is old but exactly. People say Abrams M1 is the best tank and yes it is good but just because it fought insurgents or old tanks in the gulf war it was able to win flawlessly

@gav2759

Жыл бұрын

True. If you're in a Russian tank, you crap yourself at the sight of an infantryman with a can opener.

@blacky1987

Жыл бұрын

@@gav2759 or even your own systems inside 🤣

The T72 and T80 tanks are the most feared tanks in the world. Unfortunately it's their tank crews that are terrified of them.

@hieuduong7130

Жыл бұрын

They get shot by modern ATGM. No tank can survive after being hit by those

@gav2759

Жыл бұрын

Yep, their pilots find landing tricky.

@petrkdn8224

Жыл бұрын

@@hieuduong7130 nowadays* Back in their day they were in large quantities and were very powerful.. Nowadays they are laughing stock

@Dr.Brandt

Жыл бұрын

T72/T80. 😅 One Tiger Tank kills five T34 Tanks. Leopard 2 A7+ (Google Ranking Number 1) kills T80 easy and the Best HIGH TECH TANK 2023 is the new German Panther KF51 Tank (KZread).

@pointer1829

Жыл бұрын

One little spark in the ammo storage and the whole thing goes kaboom in comparison to for instance the leopard with blow out panels so if the ammo explodes the crew can still escape

Ive been waiting to see someone make this sort of video for a long time

you can't understand the superiority of a tank until you feel its rumble before you see it

10:01 Oarai high school sensei? Girls und panzer

@joancatalan1639

3 жыл бұрын

Yey girls und panzer

@FluffTubeFT

3 жыл бұрын

That's exactly what I thought. There was a scene where the sensei parachuted out of the back of the plane in her tank and landed to meet the girls.

@warpathss5253

3 жыл бұрын

@@FluffTubeFT and destroyed the principals car

@SansTheDrawer2732

3 жыл бұрын

:) FBI OPEN UP

@meeshiomesum

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah lol

M1/M1A2 Abrams doesn’t have an automatic loader...

The Sho't entered IDF Armored Corps service in the 1960s and took part in the "War for Water", circa 1965 and was the main battle tank in the Sinai Peninsula during the 6-Day War in 1967. The Sho't CL with a higher-rated Diesel engine went into service shortly after the 6-Day War.

@CS-zn6pp

Жыл бұрын

this tank should have a 5 skull rating..

So sad the Bob Semple with it's modernized 140mm railgun wasn't included

8:43 Lol winnie the pooh at the commander's hatch

Leclerc XLR doesn't have 125mm gun but 120 mm, and there are some test about a 140 mm since 2014 by Nexter.

@christopheripoll2580

Жыл бұрын

Actually, the 140mm is tested from the 90s. The project was suspended with the end of the cold war, and has been reactivated for the MGCS. Search "Leclerc Terminateur" or "Leclerc T4" or "Leclerc 140". This is a real Leclerc prototype with a 140mm gun installed.

I think we can safely say that Russian MBTs don't belong at the top of the "feared" list...unless you're counting fear from their own crews of getting a top off....

@hieuduong7130

Жыл бұрын

They got hit by modern ATGM. What do u expect when a tank get hit by anti tank weapons?

How can the T-14 be at the top of the list? It is not even in production, has never seen combat, and broke down the first time it was on a parade?

If your country is considering new MBTs, K2 Black Panther seems to be the best option. It is under service in S. Korea, where technically still at war with North. Highly reliable, easy maintenance, more economical then Leopard 2A7, and probably faster production and delivery. Its shoot-and-scoot is amazing, fires rapidly and accurately while on the move. Hypo pneumatic suspension provides among the best stability and greater angle..some issues with power packs but seems to have been resolved. One downside is that it doesn’t have RWS which would make it more urban battle ready.

@harmdallmeyer6449

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, and the cost is a Problem. I think the T-14 is the most expensive MBT now, but 8.5 Million per tank is still a lot. But I love it, such a cool tank.

@Roundonelost

Жыл бұрын

@@harmdallmeyer6449 If you buy a T-14 your a sucker thing cant even do a parade let alone fight a western MBT

@danlorett2184

Жыл бұрын

Ew autoloader, pass

The centurion shown seem to be a MK3, which uses the 84mm Ordance QF 20 pounder gun. Centurions were upgraded with L7 105mm as the stat card shows, but the model is not armed with one.

I Like it, another amazing Video for the Collection of the Best ever

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

gracias ✌️😁

Alternate tittle: Most feared MBTS for 7.0-8.3war thunder players

@hp_3266

3 жыл бұрын

Well, I would say 7.0-10.7

You should do a sequel to this video but based on what the most effective and feared tank is based on which movie monsters the tank has had to battle. The Abrams has fought the Hulk, the Japanese fought Godzilla, Mothra, etc. with their tanks and so on.

Fantastic as always! Keep it up my friend.

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Cheers! ✌️😁

Mind blowing! Great video as always...

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Cheers! ✌️😁

I love how later iterations of tanks look more and more standardized between countries, becuse they pretty much found the "ideal tank form".

@insomniacbritgaming1632

Жыл бұрын

yeah, they're all an offshoot of the Tiger and T34

@zer0her048

Жыл бұрын

@@insomniacbritgaming1632 More like kpz 70 with the flat wide turret and basic hull form with just an angled plate in front. Most Anti-Tank weapons get handled by automated systems now rather than pure armor, so there is no need for complex armor schemes now.

@balazsfonnyadt1903

Жыл бұрын

@@insomniacbritgaming1632 Well, actually, no. The US developed early MBTs based on their experiences with the M26, and their early MBTs influenced their newer ones. The Soviets' early MBTs were influenced by one of their less used, more experimental tanks, the T-44. The Centurion Mk. 1 was developed during WW2, and the Brits just went with it, occasionally up-gunning and -armoring it, then they somehow got to the Chieftain, then the Challies. The Chinese just copied the Soviets. The Swedish bought Centurions, then looked at a door wedge and said, "Yep, that looks like a tank.", then bought Leopard 2A4s after the former idea didn't work that well. The Italians just copied the Germans, basically, then took a liking to armored cars. The Germans, I believe, were influenced by the M48s they got from the US, to develop the Leopard 1, then upgraded the Leopard 1 to a degree that they rather just made a new tank that looked like the upgraded versions, but was better in every aspect, and named it Leopard 2. The French first copied their tanks off the Panthers, then the US, to some degree, in terms of general appearence. The Tigers basically had nothing to do with post-war tank design - honestly, they didn't even have much to do with tank design (regarding appearence) *during* the war, other than most nations wanted to develop tanks (and mainly cannons or ammunition) that could take them out -, and the T-34s' design got outdated and ill-suited for the post-war Soviet combat doctrine very fast.

@Mk1Male

Жыл бұрын

@@balazsfonnyadt1903 Well, actually, no. You seem determined that just about every tank was influenced by American design? Which tank do you believe to be the first classification of an MBT? You seem to think you know a lot but you don't. You really don't.

@balazsfonnyadt1903

Жыл бұрын

@@Mk1Male Where did I write that *every tank* was inspired by US tech? You can't deny they must've had influence, since they were the biggest western arms dealer after all, and most western countries used at least a few of their designs at one point or another. I believe the Centurion can be considered the first early MBT.

Panzer 68. the Swiss were so close to even more greatness

The moment when i saw the VW under the Leo 1 just reminded me for the scene from Buffalo Soldiers.

the amx 56 Leclerc tank and upgraded to 4th generation, since 2015 it is now called amx 56 Leclerc XLR, which therefore makes it the most expensive tanks in the world. thank you very much

Let’s allow everyone a hearty laugh that the T-90 was anywhere on this list as “feared”

@inisipisTV

Жыл бұрын

Just remember during the Iran/Iraq War a Battalion of Iraqi T-72s where able to destroy an entire Iranian Tank Battalion of British Challenger 1s and American M-60 tank without suffering any casualties.

@eliasziad7864

Жыл бұрын

@@inisipisTV Iraqi t72s with degraded armor and weak shells...

@thejonathan130

Жыл бұрын

@@inisipisTV cool, what happened when those same tank crews met M2 Bradleys during gulf war 1? Exactly. You can fault the Iranian tank crews for their dog ass performance.

@Gunslinger832

Жыл бұрын

​@@eliasziad7864 and? They still had huge success on battlefeild

@eliasziad7864

Жыл бұрын

@@Gunslinger832 The Soviets gave the Iraqis T72 tanks that had no optics, degraded armor and shells that can penetrate less.

The M1A2 doesnt have a auto-loader. Also the indianas havent in actuality developped their own tank before the Arjun. The Vickerd MBT as i remember was requested by them for development

@einundsiebenziger5488

3 жыл бұрын

... an* auto-loader ... the Indians* ...

@larikauranen2159

3 жыл бұрын

@@einundsiebenziger5488 ab und zu ist es schwierig mit einem tablet zu schreiben

@balazsfonnyadt1903

Жыл бұрын

If I remember correctly, the Indians had nothing to do with the initial development of the Vickers, but it was purposefully made for exports only. The Indians just built the tanks under a license agreement.

Thee most powerful and advanced tank of all time, the Ridge Wallet. So good it can keep your cards and cash safe from a 125mm main tank gun and still look good

As a veteran warthunder player: On the fear scale - pattons are teddy bears and t72 is a polar bear

I cannot imagine being a m48 crew member and seeing a T-64 for the first time.

@gav2759

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, it must be terrifying to see a flaming turret falling out of the sky.

@blyat4998

Жыл бұрын

​@@gav2759assuming the m48 shots could penetrate it first

5:10 Brawl from Transformers

Nice graphic. But check the use of composit (ceramic-Chobham armor) which was used first on the English, US and Israeli tanks). Well done!

"Merkava Mk. III" "*south korea*" W h a t?

@p8newood377

3 жыл бұрын

Your littery blind it was maded by israel

@atank6289

3 жыл бұрын

@@p8newood377 _The video said it was made by south korea. I'm not saying it wasn't made by israel_

@zydg7787

3 жыл бұрын

@@p8newood377 literally* bruh

@zydg7787

3 жыл бұрын

@@p8newood377 made*

@zydg7787

3 жыл бұрын

@@p8newood377 you're

4:11 the TAM was developed together with the German Tank manufacturer Rheinmetall and was based on the Wiesel 1.

@e.hermes604

2 жыл бұрын

On point, but it is based on the hull of the Marder 1 Infantry Fighting Vehicle, not the Wiesel 1

Videos keep on getting better and better

@husseinoskovjino9398

3 жыл бұрын

Iraqi?

Great work amazingvids!❤

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! ✌️😁

@skull3374

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmazingViz your welcome homie!

The M1 Abrams is also the MBT of Australia ever s ince the late 90s to present day

@cluelessclown

2 жыл бұрын

Egypt has their own home grown version of it as well

@Reaperfighter04

2 жыл бұрын

@@cluelessclown I don't know they did, Thank you for telling me

@tetraxis3011

Жыл бұрын

Its also Iraqs main tank

@insomniacbritgaming1632

Жыл бұрын

no, they used the leopard up until 2007, in 2007 they switched to the M1

Seeing as how designs have changed very little in the past 20-30+ years, are we reaching the pinnacle of putting a gun on a manned, metal box on tracks? A lot of the upgrades seem to be optics, electronics, communication and active defense. Most of the tanks have some variants of the same guns used for decades. It seems like the T-14 is at that weird place between a fully unmanned tank and a conventional vehicle.

@Cristian88.

Жыл бұрын

Nah. It's just because there aren t a need for better tanks. If a big war will came out, we ll improve our tanks a lot, just look at a 1930 tank and a 1950 tank

@sluin

Жыл бұрын

Maybe because there are so many ways to penetrate a tanks armor that you can only improve the technology

@flitsertheo

Жыл бұрын

You can't upgrade the guns - usually 120mm today - much further or it becomes an artillery piece.

@samulivainionpaa9338

Жыл бұрын

@@flitsertheo A gun designed as a tank gun is a tank gun, no matter the caliber, next step up for the west will most likely be 130 or 140 mm

@flitsertheo

Жыл бұрын

@@samulivainionpaa9338 They probably won't go further than 155mm, Besides storage for the larger shells the gun has to fit in a turret, the turret has to fit on a chassis and in the end the mobile tank becomes a rather immobile fortress. Something such as the "Maus", "Ratte" and other German WW2 projects.

M47 Patton In service 1951-early 1960s. When I was at Fort Carson, there was a reserve battalion that had M-47s and that was in 1978-79. The division had M60A1s but it was weird to see these reserve M47s down range on exercises.

the Germans and their tanks

@Flutschfingerbaron

3 жыл бұрын

It's Called Panzer!

@cainspace8854

3 жыл бұрын

@@Flutschfingerbaron Ja, ist es bei uns schon haha

@le17m11-

3 жыл бұрын

The best tanks in the world are tha german tanks!

@eliphas_vlka

3 жыл бұрын

@@le17m11- nooope

@ww1ww258

3 жыл бұрын

@@le17m11- agreed

Last time I was this early , t 26 was in active service

@tgc_-369_

3 жыл бұрын

Waffentrager auf E-100 Destroys t26 Ha

@thomasduren1679

3 жыл бұрын

@@tgc_-369_ who asked

@tgc_-369_

3 жыл бұрын

@@thomasduren1679 Futurama Theorem

@thomasduren1679

3 жыл бұрын

@@tgc_-369_ Theorems can't speak

@tgc_-369_

3 жыл бұрын

@@thomasduren1679 But they can tell the truth without saying a word.

Man I was gonna get one of those wallets but they hella expensive

@nicoblacknight7879

3 жыл бұрын

Bro you stole something from me XD

@kirillp2308

3 жыл бұрын

@@nicoblacknight7879 def wasn’t that wallet

@tomendruweit9386

3 жыл бұрын

@@kirillp2308 do you happen to have Schizophrenie?

@kirillp2308

3 жыл бұрын

@@tomendruweit9386 no not yet

You forgot Bob Semple

@michal31131

3 жыл бұрын

That would be "The best of ALL TIME..."

Centurion is probably the best tank ever made, absolutely dominated in Korea

7:03 I DIDN'T EXPECTED THANKS DUDE

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

You are welcome ✌️😁

@victorbuturoaga6220

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmazingViz If you want to know the TR-85 M1 and the MLI-84 are very modern romanian vehicles

@theomanex1748

3 жыл бұрын

That Romanian Tank is far the best looking tank

@victorbuturoaga6220

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmazingViz For this thing i will subscribe

"Where is the brazilian MB3 Tamoyo???" "Where is the EE-T1 Osório is ???" yeah, questions that we won't never know

@TheMadVulpen

3 жыл бұрын

Oh yeah they beated the abrams in a competition or something

@ViniciusD-bo2jh

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheMadVulpen The EE-T1 beated the Abrams inmostly questions of weight, and crew comfort, while the EE-T2 in Fire Rate, fire range (precision) and the other ones mentioned before. The MB3 tamoyo isn't that strong, but it's later variant, the MB3 Tamoyo III, Can face a M1 Abrams, but don't get your hopes high to see it winning a M1 Abrams.

@bernardomenezes808

3 жыл бұрын

Eu acredito que seja porque eles não foram introduzidos ao serviço

@ViniciusD-bo2jh

3 жыл бұрын

@@bernardomenezes808 O Osório entrou como um veículo operado pelo exército para treinamento, que mais tarde foi colocado em museus

@bernardomenezes808

3 жыл бұрын

@@ViniciusD-bo2jh então, imagino que esse seja o motivo de não estar na lista

The brand new German Leopard tank with 130mm + autoloader: *"Am I a joke to you?"* edit: I know it is still somewhat in development

@yungpindakaas

3 жыл бұрын

doesnt exist yet but is in development. The video released by rheinmetall was a challenger 2 testbed not a leopard.

@Decicamo

3 жыл бұрын

Its just in development

@Mgaming61

3 жыл бұрын

Got it, thank you all (◉‿◉)

@AZZACraft

3 жыл бұрын

@@yungpindakaas the section in this video that says Forth generation has a sentence underneath it saying "Still under development or at early stages of their generation" as it's still under development and also the Challenger Hull testbed would fit the Early stages development part aswell. Ultimately the original commenter is correct that the tank in question along with the Rheinmetall Challenger II development have a good chance to be put in the Forth generation section

@yungpindakaas

3 жыл бұрын

@@AZZACraft All of the 4th gen ones depicted are not prototypes but actual production vehicles which are already in service or on their way there. The rheinmetall 130 on the chally 2 chassis is a testbed, not nearly as close to adoption or production.

Now in the 4th Gen we have the Abrams X maybe as a contender. As a former SEP tanker myself I'm curious of the concept.

I like how u sponsor ur stuff. It’s so cool

It's hard to believe so many tanks developed during WWII are still operational. Obviously they have been retrofitted and upgraded many times over but still.

@yewisemountaingoat528

2 жыл бұрын

A proven formula probably. For many countries it's an issue of "bang-for-the-buck" and their tank doctrine might involve more urban or defensive warfare. It's also a good bet that say 800 Centurions/T-55's/M48's will still create serious destruction against an enemy which only fields say 70-80 tanks. Quantity is a quality onto its own. Some countries also keep their 40's and 50's era MBT's mothballed or as "support tanks" . Speaking of WWII designs. I believe the German MG3 general purpose machine gun is directly derived from the infamous MG42 used in WWII. I read somewhere that the "Yugoslavs" (collective name for the now independent republics) stockpiled a lot of these from their occupation by Nazi Germany and kept using them in their armed forces well into the 1980's. So by the time their civil wars started in the mid 90's a lot of people brought out their moth-balled MG42. From reports it appears as if the MG42 was as deadly in urban combat in 1994 at it had been in 1944. The Oerlikon 20mm cannon was designed in 1937 and it still seen in wide us today 85 years later. The famous M2 Browning heavy machine gun is still effective today almost a century after its initial design. So like I said, some "WWII-era" design still provide a good level of mobility and firepower to be a threat to an enemy - especially one which doesn't have that much modern anti-tank weapons. Oh, and from what I've heard *even* if these old wolves get knocked out by an rpg quite a few of them can be repaired and put back into action. I suppose whether or not these countries have a lot of "disposable tank crews" plays a part too. Patton certainly counted on that during WWII when he insisted on all production being focused on the Sherman tank knowing that he could afford to lose quite a few crews with repaired knocked-out Shermans.

@danlorett2184

Жыл бұрын

A lot of those chassis have been converted into support or training vehicles, where they work fine. A huge number of countries used converted shermans for recovery vehicles for decades.

@ElGoogKO

Жыл бұрын

Is no hard to believe at all. They are mechanical devices and can be maintained. Just like old buildings. If you maintain and improve an old building it will last a long time. Why are they running?! Because is cheaper to keep old stock and gradually improve it rather than spend more money on developing new ones and then buying those new ones at a new price.

Really interesting but needs updating now. Challenger 3 has been announced.

6:13 abrams didnt use autoloader

And now this list is missing the KF-51 Panther

@insomniacbritgaming1632

Жыл бұрын

Nah that's still in final stages of prototyping/early production... and going back to the WW2 names of tanks hmmmm wonder what Germany is planning

@Sevencato

Жыл бұрын

@@insomniacbritgaming1632 The funny thing is that Germany wasn't expecting the Panther. Germany is planning with an Leopard 3 in cooperation with France. The Panther is a solo Trip from Rheinmetall.

10:42 Putin

@iskandartaib

3 жыл бұрын

8:25 - Modi. 8:35 - Winnie the Pooh.

Great video 😁👍 And nice to see more sponsors 😉

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks! ✌️😁

Love your stuff!

Jeez finally a new video

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

Election time 😁😁😁

@ThefourthPistol

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmazingViz hmmmmm ok

Another T-14 Armata, 300 pieces at least, and if also put a 152 mm gun, it will be generally wonderful.

@redcommissar4613

2 жыл бұрын

It's naebalovo Don't tap!!!

@MovementFAV

2 жыл бұрын

It will take another 5 yrs or so until T-14 will be made battle ready. Says Russian defense with details undisclosed

Abrams “why are you here?” Armata “I have no idea!”

The ridge wallet at the end was epic

The most feared tank ever built is the Mammoth tank

@martinlatour9311

Жыл бұрын

*queue Hell March*

Unreal tournament music!! Instant like

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

My clan at that time was UFA. 😁😁

@loganghenderson1251

3 жыл бұрын

I don't remeber the map name of this song, can you give more insight?

@alexfrance8864

2 жыл бұрын

@@loganghenderson1251 it's an onslaught map that's a very red map

I hear the Italian tank is the only one on the list with backup lights.

You should do a video covering battleship size comparisons

Lovely continue ❤❤❤❤

So the UK Challenger 1 still hold the record by hitting the enemy tank of the range of almost five thousand meters , and the FR Leclerc XLR (4 gen) is able to detect tagets at night of range up to 4000m. Truly?

@bencarlisle8124

2 жыл бұрын

Yes challenger 1 still holds the record

@insomniacbritgaming1632

Жыл бұрын

@@bencarlisle8124 Longest confirmed kill, something like 3km

@balazsfonnyadt1903

Жыл бұрын

@@insomniacbritgaming1632 5100 metres (roughly 3 miles), I remember someone mentioning the exact model of APFSDS they used, but I forgot where I found that info :(

I love the T-55 and Type 59

@richardslack8873

3 жыл бұрын

I did see a T55 up close its not all that

I am highly disappointed he didn't mention T-72M4CZ what is a much better upgraded design than PT-91 Twardy. He even mentioned the worst MBT what is TR-85M1.

2 things The Type 10 has a 3 second flat reload, it maintained this fire speed from the Type90. 120mm every 3 seconds. And the second thing, you didnt include the M1A2D (SEPv4) D:

@kellerweskier7214

2 жыл бұрын

@Maria Hotgirl Vlogs alright, the Type99A, what about it? the chinese autoloader has an 8s reload just like the T-90MS. Making the munition larger doesnt make it reload faster, just makes it hit harder.

@vojtakkojecky7765

Жыл бұрын

The type90 has reload about 4s. Type10 is 3.0 - 3.5 seconds reload

@vojtakkojecky7765

Жыл бұрын

@@kellerweskier7214 ofc it doesnt realod faster if the ammo is bigger depends on layout of the autoloader. Also russian autoloaders have problems with ammo position depending on where the ammo is in the ring makes the times. Its between 8 and 12s i think. Type10 and other tanks with this kind of autoloader have only minimal problems with this

@kellerweskier7214

Жыл бұрын

@@vojtakkojecky7765 found out not long ago that the Type10 also has an overdrive on its loading system. 1.5s reload. The issue with this is that it ignores ammo type and just roles whats next.

@vojtakkojecky7765

Жыл бұрын

@@kellerweskier7214 yeah it could be a problem 1,5 seconds is time from the loader into the breach. Movr inside of the autoloader takes the rest.

“Most feared MBTs... arjune mk 2”

@TheMadVulpen

3 жыл бұрын

So strong it could demolish a platoon of T-14 armata's in one go

@stevenbreach2561

3 жыл бұрын

😆😆😆😆😆😆🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋🍋

@aediasnaini4918

3 жыл бұрын

So spice also.. like curry with spining head

@whydoihave16subs65

3 жыл бұрын

@Sourav 007 bruh the Bob Semple is stronger than that called *Arjun MK2*

@patrioticpanda7618

3 жыл бұрын

Sourav 007 very strange, it’s not April fools day

The barrel on the 2a7 is a bit short. It has a CROWS but that’s not an L/55.

It's about knowing how and _where_ to use a certain tank model. The turkish army used Leopard 2A4s in Syria - in close quarter combat situations. The 2A4 is an older Leopard model but still a pretty good tank. There's one thing to know: do not get close to good old stuff like an RPG-7 or you're getting into trouble. The turkish army ignored that and... lost many tanks and their crews.

@davidh.6930

2 жыл бұрын

well tanks are not made for close combat situations, any tank is a compromise. The top of a tank is usually not heavily protected. THe A4 can withstand frontal hits of an RPG7 several times even the sides are well protected against it but as soon as you get to the top or the back of (basically any tank) and land a hit tanks are ot of comission. In close quaters fights tanks are usually defended by an infantry team. they defend the tank against siding the Tank is a moving coversystem for the infantry team. if you deplay any tool of war outside its field you make it vounerable if you dont account for this vounerability you lose your tool

For me its always been about real time trials and evaluation example the Israeli Arab wars gave the centurion top marks and proved that numbers never really mattered when going up against inferior tanks , more so when it comes to accurate rapid rate of fire on the move and at long range like the Gulf wars , with the added bonus of being able to fight through thick smoke and at night . and again , quality over numbers , example the battle of 73 Easting .

@MovementFAV

2 жыл бұрын

Only one M1A1 was destroyed due to a friendly fire, and about 180 T72s Type 69s and so on, i believe

@ElGoogKO

Жыл бұрын

The tanks might not be inferior but the brains, the electronics make the difference. I mean you can have a competitive modern to nato standards T55 modernization (in the form of other name tanks taken by various countries)

@badbotchdown9845

Жыл бұрын

Idf have only won by two main assets Very well trained crews Have tanks centurions who could pointing barrel in depression at the battle of Cisjordania.

What do you say when you've hit an enemy tank when you're in a Sho't? Nice shot

2:06 "oh no, we squashed a beetle"

You will need to add the Challenger 3. British army unveiled it about a week or two ago

Esta muy bien hecho el TAM, saludos desde argentina.

@bautistahernandezfernandoa85

3 жыл бұрын

30 milímetros de espesor de armadura...

@osterreich-ungarie6168

3 жыл бұрын

@@bautistahernandezfernandoa85 eso esta bien o esta mal? Xd

@bautistahernandezfernandoa85

3 жыл бұрын

@@osterreich-ungarie6168 teniendo en cuenta que un M1A2 Abrams tiene casi 1 metro de armadura... Si.

@osterreich-ungarie6168

3 жыл бұрын

@@bautistahernandezfernandoa85 pero esta comparando algo super nuevo con algo de 1983

@facundosoplan896

3 жыл бұрын

@@bautistahernandezfernandoa85 El TAM está re desactualizado y no es un tanque diseñado para aguantar impactos, está diseñado para atacar primero y retirarse con su gran movilidad

The M1A2 sepv3 weight 80 US tons, or 72.4 metric tons. More than the Arjun mk2

@omchantal69

Жыл бұрын

According to wikipedia: M1A2 weights 73.6 Short tonnes, or 66.8 Metric tonnes. where did you get that 72.4 Metric tonnes though?

@itsthatguyfromthething

Жыл бұрын

@@omchantal69 I get it from the TM provided to me as a gunner on a sepV3. Also the numbers provided previously are approximate since I could remember the exact weight.

@itsthatguyfromthething

Жыл бұрын

@@omchantal69 the m1a2 base weight is 72 short tons. The v3 is about 80 short tons or around 72 metric tons.

Excelente video 👌👋👏👏. Sete extrañaba

@patricio6036

3 жыл бұрын

Si

@AmazingViz

3 жыл бұрын

Gracias ✌️😁

@patricio6036

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmazingViz hey bro podes hacer una del ejercito argentino saludos

Great video!!! As all yours!!!

8:40 I see what you have done there with the chinese tank. LOL. Nice

Soviet tanks are sexy af

@markipoo2648

3 жыл бұрын

*JAWS DROP* *EYES POP OUT* HUMMINA HUMMINA *AWOOGA AWOOGA* *CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP* *WHISTLE(x10)* *BAZOOING* *JAW DROPS AGAIN*

@theanglo-lithuanian1768

3 жыл бұрын

Idk. Nato ones such as the Leopard and Challenger look stunning. Same with Israeli ones.

@patrickbuhrman2967

2 жыл бұрын

Because they always pop their tops?

Ngl the type 99A looks dope. I like that forest Minecraft design