This is the best retelling of Moses' story I've ever seen in motion picture. Thank you for being accurate! You are such a refreshment in such a time as this!

14:58 Moses: no. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!

Moses is right here my brother

CAN WE ALL PLEASE STOP FIGHTING

@user-zw8em8kx2h

5 ай бұрын

JUST LET PEOPLE BELIVE IN WHAT WANT

@user-zw8em8kx2h

5 ай бұрын

I am Christian myself and I don’t care if a story from the Bible is featured on this channel! It’s still a story you can tell and any good story or legend, real or not, is considered Mythology.

Yo, I can't believe that the people, including Moses' own brother, literally heard the voice of God speak to them in this myth and give them laws and they STILL got bored and started worshipping a gold calf.

@MrGreen-fi5sg

Жыл бұрын

It's not a myth jerk.

@Himmyjewett

Жыл бұрын

People big dumb

@TheMormonSorceress

Жыл бұрын

The Jews has always been stuborn people.

Love your videos! These comments… damn, I should have seen that talking about Hebrew Mythology would attract this type of discussions (I guess it would be the same if you do some Christian or Muslim mythologies). Didn’t know my name was pronounced “Nebo” in the translation, nice to know.

0:22

Ye lost in the sins of this world repent and receive the holy spirit through Jesus Christ for its not to late🙏🏼

Moses is the great deliverer of the Bible😁👍 by the way what happened to Rameses anyway after the armies of egyptian died in the Red Sea🤔

@bryancroidragon457

Жыл бұрын

Nothing happened to Ramesses. The most likely candidates for the position of the Pharaoh of the Exodus come from the Eighteenth Dynasty such as Ahmose I and Thutmose II. Ramesses II belonged to the Nineteenth dynasty and he lived a long and happy life as Kemet's greatest king, a great builder of monuments, the signer of the world's first peace treaty and finally died at the age of ninety, after which his thirteenth son Merneptah succeeded him. By the time of Ramesses, Moses would have been long since dead.

Moses is not a mythical Character my friend.

@tyrchtemph1881

2 жыл бұрын

"Exodus was traditionally ascribed to Moses himself, but modern scholars see its initial composition as a product of the Babylonian exile (6th century BCE), based on earlier written and oral traditions, with final revisions in the Persian post-exilic period (5th century BCE). This is based on certain elements cited in the texts that did not exist in that time period the events claimed to occur. The consensus among scholars is that the story in the Book of Exodus is best understood as a myth, and does not accurately describe historical events." -There's no evidence within the historical/archeological record to suggest Moses was an actual historical individual and not a mythical figure.

@marieindia8116

2 жыл бұрын

@@tyrchtemph1881 hahahahaha...you fell into the modern critic's "no evidence" trap. The easiest mistake archeologists and historians make on a constant basis is concluding that lack of evidence is evidence of lack. And you should also remember that there is an entire cadre of biased skeptics of various credentials who are always trying to cast doubt on everything the Bible says, to a level that other ancient works are never subject. But I suspect you know this well.

Lord you saved him from those crocodiles didn't you?

7:05 also not accurate... Israel was not spared from all the plagues. If they did not comply with instructions, they also suffered the first 3 plagues.

@achilles7607

5 ай бұрын

I know this was two years ago... But can you tell me what instructions the Israelites were given?

IGNORANCE... Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; It's about Baptism, not getting wet, not leaving earth, but a new mind. Heaven is within.

So if we transfer our conscious or move to Mars, can we still go to heaven or miss the trip there because I'm farming on Venus for 6.3 billion light years away

From the river to the sea Isreal will be free

6:10 is inaccurate. the text is not very clear but the best understanding of Exodus 4:24-26 is that God met Moses' family on the road and was going to kill one of his sons because he hadn't been circumcised yet, as was the custom since Abraham's time. Zipporah, the mother, took quick action by taking the child's foreskin immediately and showing it to the angel of God. Thus she saved her son's life.

Let's wait until judgment day and stand before an angry/Holy true God. Let's see you think the words of God is a myth.

@first9_yt

Жыл бұрын

Don't get Angry my Brother. God is MOST MERCIFUL . What do you expect when someone believes that universe is just an accident and ORIGIN of life on earth is by abiogenesis. Then such things were inevitable. Those wrongdoers who deny the existence of God, you think it's a big deal for them to DENY the PROPHETs? The people who believe that Human beings evolved ie darwinism, as they believe that universe is accident, you think they will ever believe in Revelation? Don't argue with them.

@MrGreen-fi5sg

Жыл бұрын

@@first9_yt It's low but not zero. Jesus left the crowd of 99 to find the one lost sheep.

Just saying any story from the Quran is true and no one can argue about that

@hondo8885

2 жыл бұрын

@Elty Hangsing This is disgusting behavior, he has the right to believe whatever he wants. There is no need for you to be trashing his beliefs.

@hanyabenar2934

2 жыл бұрын

@@hondo8885 the ideology is dangerous and of course... Stupid

@Shiobana753

2 жыл бұрын

@@hanyabenar2934 if you hadn't added the "and stupid" part of your comment you would have avoided looking stupid yourself

@Shiobana753

2 жыл бұрын

@Elty Hangsing Okay Reddit.

@bawisang4981

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shiobana753 smh😂

Moses was not a mythology. Now if your saying, but why he has no record? Well the egyptians destroyed all certain artifact or record of moses because of their lost. There's a lot of evidences to support that moses was not a myth. Not just relying on the egyptians.. if your an atheist I can't blame you though.

@tyrchtemph1881

2 жыл бұрын

That's completely false. The modern scholarly consensus is that the biblical person of Moses is largely mythical, a "mythic hero and the central figure in Hebrew mythology". The story of Moses's discovery picks up a familiar motif in ancient Near Eastern mythological accounts of the ruler who rises from humble origins. No archaeological evidence been discovered in Egypt or the Sinai wilderness to support the story, which isn't dependent on Egyptian record keeping. Biblical date for the exodus story does not match up with historical and archeological facts. Number 2: with the bible's claim of 10 terrible plagues (including the death of every single firstborn son) it would have been a colossal loss of life, then afterward well over a million Israelites left Egypt on the same night. With the estimated population of Egypt at that time, the sudden loss of a fifth of the population would have crippled Egypt and that couldn't be hidden from the historical/Archeological record. As for the conquest of Canaan, Canaan at that time was a tightly controlled colony of Egypt with colonial forts and garrisons. It would make no sense to escape out of Egypt, then go into a country that itself was an Egyptian colony. And at that time, excavations showed Jericho was small and unwalled (no battle of Jericho) and other "conquered" towns such as Ai and Arad were not even inhabited- "The lack of archaeological evidence and the composition history and theological purposes of the Book of Joshua have led archaeologists to characterise the story of the fall of Jericho as "invented out of whole cloth". The Pentateuch, which contain the Exodus story, was composed mostly in the Middle Persian Period (5th century BCE) with the Exodus story altered and expanded under the influence of the return from the Babylonian captivity in the sixth century BCE. The consensus of modern scholars is that the Torah does not give an accurate account of the origins of the Israelites, who appear instead to have formed as an entity from the indigenous Canaanite culture. Basically Israelites were originally Canaanites who formed a new identity for themselves after the collapse of Canaanite society. The Hebrew language is itself a Canaanite dialect. All archeological evidence points to Israelites being indistinguishable from Canaanites in Iron I. Stop just relying on "biblical sources" which are often contradicted by the actual historical and archeological data.

@tyrchtemph1881

2 жыл бұрын

@Connor Kenway There is NOT "proof of a Jesus". There is proof of a popular circulating story. But that's no different than Hercules. In fact, the evidence for Jesus are identical for Hercules......hearsay. Just as we have no artifacts, personal writings, or eyewitness accounts about Hercules, we also have nothing about Jesus. All claims about Jesus derive from writings of other people who never witnesses to any such events. The gospels are not contemporary. None of the gospel writers were eyewitnesses to Jesus or alive during that time. Even the author of Luke admits himself as an interpreter of earlier material, and not an eyewitness. The gospels writers were anonymous Greek speaking well educated writers who never claimed to have met an earthly Jesus. The Gospels were written in the third person by people skilled in Greek composition. The Epistles of Paul (being the oldest surviving New Testament texts) cannot serve as a source for a historical Jesus either because not a single instance in any of Paul's writings claims that he ever meets or sees an earthly Jesus, nor does Paul give any reference to Jesus life on earth. In fact, the story had Jesus killed before Paul even met him and it's a "supernatural vision" Paul had instead.......which is useless because the historical record does not affirm any of the many mythical supernatural claims of past ancient works of literature. *Isn't it weird that Paul's writings are dependent on the 'supernatural divine' element for Jesus rather than an actual normal living person.....and then sometime AFTERWARD a group of detailed stories from non-eyewitnesses about Jesus life from the Gospels suddenly appear out of nowhere? HMMMM.* No outside sources are contemporary. Tacitus is not contemporary since his birth puts him well after the alleged life of Jesus. His brief mention of Jesus in Annals was written well after the first Gospels were already circulating. He also mentioned Hercules many more times in the same works than Jesus. Both Josephus and Pliny's birth place them out of range of eyewitness account. Josephus also wrote Antiquities after the first Gospels were circulating and he too mentioned Hercules more times than Jesus in the same works, just like Tacitus. But we don't point to Josephus or Tacitus to claim Hercules was a real historical person, so no one should do the same with Jesus. We do have a famous ancient historian (Philo Judaeus) who was actually CONTEMPORARY to the area, living DURING that time period who would have still been alive after Jesus death. But NONE of his writings documented any events of the Gospels narratives or Jesus. It's funny how all these non-eyewitnesses who weren't alive at the time somehow knew all these intricate details, but the one person who actually lived DURING that time period IN THAT AREA knew nothing? I don't think so & the historical record agrees. New Testament scholars who claim Jesus was a real person are only using the Gospels as their sources because.....there's nothing in the historical record! But using the gospels does not equate proof since the gospels are not really a work of historicity nor eyewitness accounts.

@rhodkianmamenta1528

2 жыл бұрын

@Connor Kenway just let him be bro. What he did to us was also experienced by the early Christians. I'll pray for you to be strong not just physically but spiritually same for that guy. Don't let ignorance and foolishness get you. May God be with you ❤️

@tyrchtemph1881

2 жыл бұрын

@Connor Kenway Sigh. I guess you didn't know who those historians actually were. A Roman historian.....you mean ....TACITUS...which I already addressed who wasn't even born at that time and wrote his works after the gospels were being passed around? A Jewish historian....like...JOSEPHUS...who also wasn't alive yet like Tacitus....and also only mentioned Jesus after the earliest gospels were written? Their mention of Jesus were based on the stories they read or heard from people who did not witness it. Just....like...their...mention...of...Hercules. Get it? Again, as I said, there are NO historians (except 1) who were both alive and eyewitnesses DURING the time period to any of these events. The only Jewish historian who was alive at that exact time to be an eyewitness was Philo Judaeus. And Philo does NOT corroborate ANY of the gospel's claims at all. No mention of a Jesus figure. No mention of any events of the gospels. So, no....a real Jesus did not exist.

@tyrchtemph1881

2 жыл бұрын

@@rhodkianmamenta1528 You can't ignore the truth. The evidence is clear in regard to these false religious claims peddled out by believers. Foolishness is denying it. Faith isn't based on evidence. That's where it crumbles because evidence can disprove and dismiss unsupported claims.

Hitchens has argued that Israeli archeologists have had all the reasons to dig up the "title deeds of Zionism" in the Sinai and have failed to find any. The whole story of exodus is make-believe.

@joshuajackson4742

3 жыл бұрын

Because a hateful Marxist said that? Ok.

@tramberg1972

2 жыл бұрын

1 Cor 10 states that very fact. Led by God,,, yet lost for 40 years... Mythology, which makes it true. The Exodus describes the Baptism of Water and Fire, to seeing the Promised Land, a renewed mind.

@tramberg1972

2 жыл бұрын

@@joshuajackson4742 no, because the Bible said so. These 'stories' we're written for our example... Not a history lesson.

@himanv

2 жыл бұрын

it's not about who said it. If you're going to be literalist about biblical "history" then it should come with verifiable proofs. And archeologists looked for these proofs but didn't find any. What's most fantastic about literalist Christians is that they believe every word if the bible to be the literal truth (nevermind all the translations and lost meanings over the years), but deny the same reverence to the origin stories of other religions! In fact, they militantly attack others for following myths and false gods...meanwhile, we're to believe that their god led them astray for 40 years! Haha

@achilles7607

5 ай бұрын

There are evidence found in the red sea. Also Zion and Zionism is from the bible.

Why did god try to kill Moses? That makes no sense. Also, why did god order the slaughter of innocent children? That’s atrocious. And that’s coming from someone who doesn’t even like kids.

@Shiobana753

2 жыл бұрын

The point of the tenth plague was to show the Pharaoh and the Egyptians the same pain the Israelites felt when their children were thrown into the Nile to either drown or get eaten by the crocodiles that swam in it.

@shaundramann9161

2 жыл бұрын

The Bible is not myth. Jesus is real. Ask Him to reveal Himself to you. WhT do you have to lose?

@tyrchtemph1881

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shiobana753 And such is the nonsensical logic of the bible, especially regarding ethics. Never mind the children, right? Let's use the children to inflict pain on others for actions the children themselves never committed. Doesn't matter how terrified the child would be or how painful their death could be.

@Shiobana753

2 жыл бұрын

@@tyrchtemph1881 R/Atheists

@tyrchtemph1881

2 жыл бұрын

@@1995yuda How about you take your advice. Anyone who's studied the literature of the ancient Near East (let alone general archeology or history) would quickly come to the conclusion that the bible is neither divine nor ethical.

There was NO Moses people, he a myth.

@achilles7607

5 ай бұрын

Moshe pbuh is the greatest of Prophets and holiest of men. If you don't want to believe he existed, go ahead, no one cares. But leave us alone to believe. There are evidences and even if there weren't any, the bible is all we need.

@sophiawilson8696

5 ай бұрын

@@achilles7607 Prophets and Holy Men??? Please wake up. All these prophecies! . They all selfully.

@achilles7607

5 ай бұрын

@@sophiawilson8696 What does selfully means?