The kid playing young Monk was brilliant. He captured that gentle smile perfectly.

Monk definitely had a type…. Trudy & Sherry could be twins 😄😄 Also the kid who played Monk in high school did such a good job catching the mannerisms of Monk! 🙂

@iganpparamarta8813

Жыл бұрын

Don't forget the Zemenian lady and the one from S01 (Monk and the other woman). They kinda look similar to each other, Trudy's alike.

@oscara8746

7 ай бұрын

Same kid Ari from the Royal Tenenbaums

@ecstasycalculus

6 ай бұрын

@@oscara8746 also Oliver Beene

It’s sad. If the housekeeper wasn’t there she probably would’ve been fine with the breaking and entering

@N1k4_Gr1v

11 ай бұрын

Were it so easy

@berndarndt9924

9 ай бұрын

thats why you don't risk your life for property, especialy for somebody elses property.

@gerardomacias7370

7 ай бұрын

@@berndarndt9924hey she had no idea why they were there. It could have been to torch the place or vandalism.

@addisonwelsh

7 ай бұрын

@@berndarndt9924 Never assume that someone breaking into your house is only there for property. If someone breaks into your home while you're in it, assume the worst.

@kristinamartines6806

7 ай бұрын

@@addisonwelshforcing a confrontation is actually a lot more dangerous if you think someone in your house hide( or leave if possible )

One of the most bittersweet episodes of Monk that will always be one of the best. He had a chance to find love and happiness but he did what had to be done. Despite his actions at times, he is truly a selfless person when it comes to love.

@scottgodfrey7118

Жыл бұрын

She married the man who abused her as a kid. He dodged a bullet. Monk may have had ocd but she is crazy.

@lucindamobley5492

10 ай бұрын

And he was rewarded for it when he met his Trudy. She was his true love and always will be.

@a.g.demada5263

10 ай бұрын

​@@scottgodfrey7118 no, that wasn't the same guy

0:30 Saddest thing is, Gladys the maid wasn’t even supposed to be there, it was supposed to be her day off.

@MrLego3160

8 ай бұрын

yeah, i finished the video too.

3:48 is why Monk will always be one of my all-time favorite shows.

@arjunratnadev

11 ай бұрын

a bit too cheesy for digestion maybe?

@Josh.WDW.

11 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂 sweeping up while hiding DURING a bar brawl

This episode always makes me feel sad for Adrian.😢 At least he still did the right thing even if he didn’t get to go out with Sherry.❤️

@scottgodfrey7118

Жыл бұрын

Sherry married her bully. Monk dodged a bullet with someone THAT dumb.

@globbyakaweirdjellyguy954

Жыл бұрын

@@scottgodfrey7118 I for the longest time thought Sherry married her bully too, but they aren’t the same guy.

@a.g.demada5263

11 ай бұрын

I was sad too he didn't go out with Sherry in the end

@finnypaul7748

6 ай бұрын

She married someone like him . Pretty girl likes mean guys

(1:47) "I only remember the date. And what everybody wore...and what everybody said, and what everybody did."

“So they must of brought (the spray paint) with them!” Monk’s look at Natalie😂😂😂 “Thank you.”

Monk smiles when he solves the case

*FUN FACT:* This is the episode where the principal magically time traveled into the future to get that five dollar bill... 8:52

@godlyBlade

Жыл бұрын

Alright, I'll bite. I don't know what you mean. Is it that five dollar bills didn't exist back then or is there something on that particular dollar bill I am not seeing that indicates when it was made?

@kadindarklord

Жыл бұрын

@@godlyBlade Not being American, I looked it up on the Monk Wiki. The one on the medium shot is era appropriate, but the close-up bill, isn't. Note: Redone to be clearer.

@FelixRodriguez

11 ай бұрын

@@godlyBlade 8:53 The "Big head" bills as shown in the close up of the $5 didn't appear until 2000, all bills in the 70's (when the flashback takes place) would have been the smaller heads like on the current $1 that never got updated. What's odd is that the medium shot right before the close up DOES have the accurate bill for the era, but then changes to the more modern one for the close up shot.

One of best shows ever made

@ekbanks

Жыл бұрын

Star gate sg 1 was up there as well.

@NeenaWivart-dr2ed

11 ай бұрын

I totally agree.

Natalie doesn't know Monk's "I know who did it" face

She should have went to the alarm before announcing her presence

@harringt100

Жыл бұрын

She should have *gone* to the alarm.

@lc5786

Жыл бұрын

@@harringt100 lol, you got the point, which is the only true person of language. Communicate thought 😀

@pierrefley5000

Жыл бұрын

@@lc5786 only true *purpose*

@nelsonbrum8496

Жыл бұрын

She should have learned how to actually use the gun. There would have been at least 1 less scumbag in San Freakcisco ...

😂 Adrian cracks me up with all his quirks 🤣

These cozies would go a lot worse if the villains didn't always confess the second things started going wrong.

Worse they can hit the guy for is conspiracy, Aiding & Abetting, and Accessory to B&E. It was the other two who are screwed for the accidental homicide, B&E, and vandalism in full. A good lawyer would have him off the murder charge and on conditional release in no time.

@8Rincewind

8 ай бұрын

I think he could still be done for manslaughter. But regardless, it's still a life changing conviction. He'd probably lose his job and would be rejected from any future jobs where he was given any trust or authority. Not to mention the social ramifications, how many of his friends and family would stick by him after what he did? Also, aren't there other legal and bureaucratic consequences? Aren't convicts prevented from voting or owning a gun? He might not care about either of those, but still. And wouldn't he be locked out of a load of things because of the conviction? It would probably affect things like insurance and loans and other stuff.

@danielmikula1375

8 ай бұрын

I'm not sure about how exactly California law works, but I'm pretty sure he qualifies for felony murder charges. He commissioned the felony of breaking and entering and someone died as a result.

@alexm4610

8 ай бұрын

@@danielmikula1375so I thought about that too but breaking and entering I’m pretty sure is a misdemeanor

@stanlee3619

8 ай бұрын

​@@danielmikula1375You are correct. You are guilty of anything that forseeably results from the conspiracy. You hire guys break into a house, there's a likelihood someone dies as a result, so he is charged with it. It's like a bank robbery gang, the getaway driver can't say nobody was supposed to get hurt when the guard is killed. He gets charged for the murder of the guard also.

@stanlee3619

8 ай бұрын

​@@alexm4610The breaking and entering forseeably results in the death of someone.

Wait did she married the boy who made her out to be a thief when they were children?

@Burnlit1337

Жыл бұрын

No the husband Michael and the bully Leo are two different people. But yeah it is a bit confusing since they lined them up like that

@MyTwell

Жыл бұрын

@@Burnlit1337 😂😂 ok!

@timriggins6678

Жыл бұрын

I think Leo shows up in another episode asking Monk for help.

Good episode:)That's same kid who was in Cheaper by the Dozen I believe, he was Henry Baker:)

Ok since most people in the comments don't know how the law works here is why her ex-husband was also charged with murder: felony murder doctrine n. a rule of criminal statutes that any death which occurs during the commission of a felony is first degree murder, and all participants in that felony or attempted felony can be charged with and found guilty of murder.

@jonathanw1019

10 ай бұрын

Here's where I'm hung up: In CA, for breaking and entering to be a felony there has to be an intent to steal or destroy property of a certain value. They weren't there to steal anything, they were there to damage a painting. If the painting isn't that valuable, then its destruction/damage could just be a misdemeanor level charge. CA would of course charge him anyway, but a good lawyer could probably negotiate something in his favor.

Awesome episode of Monk

@ktom5262

Жыл бұрын

The usual.👍

I heard the show is being picked up for another season or a movie I think, super excited. I also think it would have been very interesting if Trudy‘s daughter had been raised by Monk, to see his dynamic with raising a child that would’ve been amazing and interesting to watch. I think they would’ve definitely made each other so much better, and should’ve been a very smart girl.

@fly89

25 күн бұрын

can’t watch it unless you are in the USA. i can not even buy it. 😢

08:52 Classic Five Dollar Bill. 08:53 Contemporary Five Dollar Bill.

@therealcrustymusty

Жыл бұрын

Good eye!

This episode especially my favourite

"My curse is that i see not the world as it is, but instead, as it should be" -Hercule Poirot

there needs to be more episodes showing monk's life after getting past some phobias. did he get past all of them? did he let himself love again?

@MonaRoseyPayne

8 ай бұрын

There is a movie coming out on Peacock soon!

@vladtepes97

8 ай бұрын

@@MonaRoseyPayne soon? But i want it now!

@chorlesteajones6794

7 ай бұрын

@@vladtepes97 SAME!

@vladtepes97

Ай бұрын

@@MonaRoseyPayne well?!!!!!!!

Yes, Adrian is amazing.

he had no intention of killing anyone, otherwise he would've just killed his ex instead.

Monk was a born detective he was solving cases even before he had teeth

"It was all about the Zeroes..."

Wow it’s over 50 years ago!

"They must have brought it with them". ........"Thank you". Monk could be so mean.

@r0bw00d

Жыл бұрын

Sherlock Holmes was meaner. "Now that the obvious is out of the way..."

@davidchism6081

3 ай бұрын

​@@r0bw00dthat's not Blackwood!!! Now that we have a firm grasp of the obvious...

Monk: "Now I accept money for my work"

Why don't you upload complete episodes?

Lol… I put lines through zeros like that! 😛

@davidhoward4715

Жыл бұрын

Murderer!

Travis is Chris Pratt before he went off into space to become Star Lord leader of the Guardians of the Galaxy 😂

I thought Monk wasn't like this until his wife was killed... I'll have to rewatch I guess.

@Jazzypants2007

Жыл бұрын

No, he was always OCD, it just got more extreme after Trudy's death.

@a.g.demada5263

10 ай бұрын

​@@Jazzypants2007 yes, I was impressed to see that when he was young he seemed to be more like an autistic boy (I'm autistic)

Alimony, what a pool cue up the kazoo!

"I only remember the date, and what everybody wore, and said, and did..."

sweet & sad

What's Tuco doing in San Francisco?

On some level I felt bad for the ex husband. It may not really be anyone's fault why the marriage didn't work and if they housekeeper wasn't there everyone would have been happier

@GauravGupta-rz6zb

5 ай бұрын

Me too, I always feel bad about Alimony law. It's kind of wrong how ex-husband has to pay to his wife all her life until she gets remarried. Why not help her to be part of work force again , or start a new business. Husband should be made responsible for paying alimony till she is back on her feet and take care of herself, and that should include tuition as well if she wants to go back to school specially if she has been a house wife all her life. but no, they just enjoy rest of their lives in vacation with their ex-husband money.

Does anyone know if Monk ever solved the mystery of who killed his wife?

@janestarr4403

Жыл бұрын

Yes, he was on the brink of death when found Trudy's confession that she'd had a child with a respected judge. The judge killed her and everyone who knew that Trudy was pregnant from the affair. Monk held a gun on the murderer, forcing him to uncover evidence that proved he was guilty. Adrian found and met Trudy's daughter. He told her about her mother. Case closed.

@elizabethcox5911

Жыл бұрын

Yes, he did.

@superstarsmash64

Жыл бұрын

It was Natalie. She killed Trudy in order to setup the chain of events that would lead her to having a job as Monk's nurse.

@r0bw00d

Жыл бұрын

Check out the series finale.

@stacistaci6657

Жыл бұрын

@@r0bw00d I'm on a tight budget.

There's a continuity error in this video. At 8:53 the 5 dollar bill is a new 1999 bill. This would not exist at the time Monk was a kid.

This was a Natalie-Case? Weird, I could've sworn that this episode happened during Sharona's tenure.

If you have a gun, use it.

I should have watched Monk when it was on air

This wasn't a murder, maybe complicity to manslaughter at worst.

@ogladaczr.t.3168

Жыл бұрын

hey, go back to Albuquerque Saul, leave San Francisco alone

@iganpparamarta8813

Жыл бұрын

Will she keep receiving money after he gets in jail? Or all of his wealth? It's a nice system for the ex-wife to receive money after divorce.

@harringt100

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I can't believe any prosecutor would charge Shery's ex with murder. Let alone a jury convict him.

@Crayshack

Жыл бұрын

Any deaths that occur as a result of the premeditated commission of a felony are counted as murder, even if there was no intent to kill.

I wonder what happened to the bully monk exposed as a kid

They never said why the housekeeper didn’t go on her day off

*MONK* (S4, Ep08; _Mister Monk and Little Monk_ ; August 26, 2005)

Why did the burglars use gloves that dont cover their finger tips?😂

@diehardrvdfan22

11 ай бұрын

Because they weren't burglars. If the housekeeper hadn't been there it would have just been vandalism that nobody would've really batted an eye at.

@shelbynamels973

11 ай бұрын

@@diehardrvdfan22 Doesn't matter. They were still breaking and entering, which is a felony. Also, getting paint on their hands would have been a dead giveaway.

@shelbynamels973

11 ай бұрын

From today's perspective, total amateur hour. Today, you'd have to expect surveillance cameras and DNA evidence, and, of course, finger prints.

@jonathanw1019

10 ай бұрын

@@shelbynamels973 In CA, B and E is only a felony if you intend to commit theft or another felony. The value of the painting, or cost of its restoration, might have been below the amount needed to count as felony destruction of property, which means that they only committed a misdemeanor. He didn't even plan to have the painting destroyed. He wanted it damaged in a way that was restorable, ie, impermanent, so she would go meet the restorer. They didn't bring a gun or use hers, so no robbery, either.

@shelbynamels973

10 ай бұрын

@@jonathanw1019 I find that hard to accept, but OK. But the law does draw a distinction between a commercial burglary and breaking into an inhabited dwelling, so maybe still a felony?

I will sad for monk he was about to make a move when Sherri and jimmy met

Why she married the bully? Like that still did not make sense to me lmao

Here's what happened...

What interest me the most is how after divorce she kept a house and get alimony monthly payment of 26 k until she remarry?! 😮 Anybody need a wife? Lol

Felt kinda bad for the husband. He clearly only wanted to get out of paying his wife (in a way that would actually have made her happyas well ) but I think according to American law, he can be charged with murder as well? He deserves some punishment, but that seems overblown in my opinion.

@andraspongracz5996

Жыл бұрын

I don't think he can be charged with murder at all. He hired two guys to break into a house and deface a painting. There's maybe vandalism, and involvement in a breaking and entering. He can also be fined for the property damage. But the murder is not on him. If I dig a well in my garden and somebody falls in and drowns, it's not murder.

@fakename6807

Жыл бұрын

@@andraspongracz5996 In some states, and I'm pretty sure California does, you can charge someone with murder if you participated in a crime that resulted in a death.

@morefiction3264

Жыл бұрын

@@andraspongracz5996 At minimum, he's an accomplice. The actual statute may vary by state.

@lc5786

Жыл бұрын

​@andraspongracz5996 he can be charged with felony murder, and aided and abetting after the fact because he knew who the killers were and didn't come forward.

@justinchang382

Жыл бұрын

felony murder and accomplice liability puts him away

If you have a gun for self defense, practice with it so you're actually confident with it.

@adamrobinson6951

Жыл бұрын

If you have a gun for self defense, it just means you're more likely to be seriously hurt or killed. Just don't have a gun, it's safer that way.

@morefiction3264

Жыл бұрын

@@adamrobinson6951 That's the myth. The truth is that firearms are used more often to prevent crimes than committed with them. For every accidental death (802), suicide (16,869) or homicide (11,348) with a firearm (29,019), 13 lives (390,000) are preserved through defensive use.

@lainiwakura666

Жыл бұрын

@@morefiction3264 in America

@fingerboxes

Жыл бұрын

Confidence with handling a weapon doesn't directly translate to confidence with shooting someone. Even if you're confident that you can shoot the person it doesn't mean that you'll actually be willing to, even if you think it's the right thing to do, even if you know that it will save someone's life, even if you're backed into a corner--even if you regret not doing it for the rest of your life. Sometimes there are situations where there's no right answer and no matter what you do, you'll have the specter of your decision haunting you in your nightmares for the rest of your life.

@morefiction3264

Жыл бұрын

@@fingerboxes Under stress you revert to training and practice. In this case, she had the rest of her life to pull the trigger.

Ill be honest I don’t think he’s liable for the murder. For the breaking and entering yes but not the murder. Could be wrong though

# 231!!!! WHOOOOOOOO.... DOGGY!!! 🤘🤘🤘🤘

Kind of a goof…the painting was glass covered

So she was pointing a gun but still couldn't shoot, what's the point of having a gun then?

I like Monk, but like most of the time. Wouldnt stand a chance in court. Btw. Repeat after me "i want a lawyer"

Dunno if I call this murder. Manslaughter is more like it

I just had an epiphany… Sherry *DID* steal the Bake Sale money; here’s what happened Sherry was hard up for cash so she could keep her flower hair clip collection growing and knew that that bad boy kid was an easy mark… She put on the magic during the bake sale to get him to buy something with the money that he had surely obtained from various nerds… nerds like Monk, who she KNEW was low-key stalking her and she’d noticed him looking at her dial lock on several occasions… As I mentioned, getting that bully to buy something was the easy part and she knew that all she needed was for him to have a $5 bill at worst or a $10 bill at best… more likely he had a $5 given the early 70’s economy The bully gets charmed in to buying something and give her the $5, which she sleight-of-hand put under the “Good Luck” $5 that the principal gave as a nice encouraging gesture Slipping the marked $5 into his change was the easy part, but so was setting him up when he helped her carry the money box to her locker Sherry KNEW that he was going to try to steal the money, that’s obvious by the sleeveless denim vest… a vest he wears to mask the fact that his home life, it ain’t so good you see, but that’s not important here… just know that it ain’t so grand over at that boys home what with the screaming and the stuff being thrown all the time and the lack of a positive or supporting parental environment; he really could’ve used a friend, but instead he crossed paths with Sherry… 😔 Anyway, after he “stole” the money (she let him) she stole it back immediately after he rounded the corner. Sherry knew that he wasn’t so good with the remembering things what with the distress of his home life causing stunted learning patterns which affected his grades creating a downward spiral of low self esteem and crippled confidence, hence the sleeveless denim vest… and that he always left his lock on the last number of the combination so he didn’t have to worry about forgetting the first 2 numbers… she saw him “phantom spinning” the dial on several occasions as well as many others where he walked right up to his locker and pulled the padlock down right away to gain access… With the money box back in her possession, it was just a matter of tricking the affable Monk, who she KNEW had eyes for her and would absolutely give her the benefit of the doubt. All she had to do set her padlock to ~any~ number other than zero, which she did… though it took a little to resist the temptation to set it to zero as she usually did, she was still able to refrain She correctly assessed that the bully would never admit to initially stealing the money box because if he did then it wouldn’t matter what he said after since he would have already painted himself as being involved at all What the bully didn’t count on was having had the marked $5 bill slipped in with his change after making a legitimate purchase with his ill-gotten lunch money from the various nerds He’s still not innocent overall since he still torments nerds and *DID* in fact steal the money box, but these factors only served to make him the perfect patsy Remember that he’s not so good with the numbers, so he didn’t think to double-count his change… if he had then he MIGHT have had a chance to present a reason why he had that marked $5 bill. But he assumed that his change was correct, though even if he’d seen the $5 bill, odds are minimal that he tells Sherry that she gave him too much back on accident Poor kid didn’t have a chance against Sherry’s brilliance, and Monks bias’ were played against him like a fiddle 🙁 ------ Edit: oh, and to those wondering why she’d give Monk one of her precious flower clips as a thank you back in the day; it was an extremely inexpensive one that she had a spare of which is why she wore that particular one that day; she’d never miss it and it even if she wanted to get another backup of it, it was very cheap; like 15¢…

@divyabadri9787

9 ай бұрын

Seriously?

I don't think they could charge him with murder based on that could they? At best manslaughter.

@jeremyadler9620

Жыл бұрын

Agreed. Feels like a bit of a stretch. Not like he WANTED anyone dead.

@elizabethcox5911

Жыл бұрын

Justice can be a little cockeyed. Knew someone once who was in prison. He and 2 other men robbed a liquor store and he went back out to the car with one of them. After they were outside, without their knowledge, the third shot and killed the clerk. They got more time than the actual killer.

That little boy looks exactly like monk 😂😂😂.

Why would he have been arrested for murder though? He didn't kill the kill the housekeeper, the goons he hired did. The goons didn't kill her on purpose, it was an accidental killing. His crime was conspiracy to commit burglary. If that implicates him in the killing, it still wouldn't be murder, it would be manslaughter.

@lynne709

5 ай бұрын

Any death that occurs during the commission of a felony is murder. It’s called the felony murder rule. There was a case a few years ago where three teenage boys broke into someone’s house and the owner of the house shot and killed one in the boys. The other two boys were charged with felony murder even though they didn’t shoot anyone.

Moral of the story. Women should never get alimony.

Wow! Chris Pratt is one of the bad guys!

To be fair. 26k a month is absolutely ridiculous. Remove alimony all of it. She can work their butts off too

If Sherry got a job, got a smaller apartment and wasn’t living off of alimony money, Gladys wouldn’t have died🙃

@xJeremySx

Жыл бұрын

Always an incel in every youtube comment section. Never fails

@sodalimesalt

Жыл бұрын

@@xJeremySx High achieving woman, but close enough🙌🏻

@you_already_have_it

9 ай бұрын

Well yeah. Also if her ex didn't hire 2 tugs to break in without actually make sure no one home. I mean the same brothers could have staked the house few hours prior to make sure it's empty, then they would notice poor Gladys was home.

Lol 😂 screw up just noticed. The $5 was a 2006 design while the school was set in the 70s 😅

From a legal point of view, the 2 men murdering the housekeeper wasn't on the man who hired them. Sure, planning a breaking in and destruction of private property is still a crime, but he planned it on a day that no one should have been there. So he's only guilty of conspiracy, but the housekeepers death is on the 2 that broke in, not on him. A good lawyer could argue that he had every intent that the 2 who broke in was to flee if someone was home to prevent this outcome.

@22espec

Жыл бұрын

No, he is still guiltu of te murder since it was commited doing a crime he was part of.

@gringossa

Жыл бұрын

No. when you're in a criminal association everyone os responsable (in different levels) for all the crimes, planned or not

@Ratharian

Жыл бұрын

@@gringossa that doesn't work. You can't have guilt by association or they would be arresting whole neighborhoods at once. If a friend asks you to key someone's car after they messed up his burger order, he's not responsible if you walk into burger world and kill everyone inside.

@DesignIncase

Жыл бұрын

@@Ratharian They would look at the situation. In this case the man tasked two others to break into a house and created a situation that is known to escalate to violence. It would probably be some manslaughter charge. If the maid had killed one or both the men, he'd still be on the hook for their deaths. In your burger world scenario, it's unlikely someone would kill another human being over it. It's possible but it's far less likely. So if that person proceeds to escalate, at best it's really a civil suit that has a chance at success. The scenario would be more in line if you were told to take a bat and smash up the place but don't physically attack. In that situation the likelihood of a violent engagement shoots up.

@Ratharian

Жыл бұрын

@@DesignIncase someone wasn't watching the same show as I apparently. The vandalism was purposely scheduled when no one was supposed t0 be there so this situation wouldn't happen. He said so, the guys even admitted as much when she confronted them. So as far burger world, you're wrong. So at best, he's on the hook for conspiracy to commit vandalism. He can't control what they do, and he sure didn't tell them to murder anyone who got int jowr way, especially since he specifically planned it for a time the house was meant to be vacant.

Trudy doesn't know what Monk's smile means? Did she just start working for him?

@mrsbluesky8415

Жыл бұрын

That’s Natalie.

@mohd88zarif7

Жыл бұрын

Trudy is Monk's late wife

@abertasso1298

Жыл бұрын

Trudy is his late wife. Natalie had not been working for Monk that long at this point, so they were still getting to know each other.

This episode was so stupid. They caught the guy based on the pattern of his zeroes? If he'd kept his mouth shut and retained a lawyer, he could have beaten the rap.

Technically I think that would be considered accident and not a murder case. The organizer of this crime haven't made request to kill anyone.

@lynne709

5 ай бұрын

He requested that they break into his ex wife’s house. That’s a crime. When someone dies during the commission of a crime, it’s murder.

A latina with two strangers in her living room is fearful of using a gun? Seems to me that once intruders are inside of a person's house, they are totally within their legal rights to use deadly force.

She died from getting her gut hit by a table? Geez. 0:24 woman of kleenex

Alimony has got to be one of the dumbest laws in America.

This has got to be one of the worst things I have ever seen, the acting is atrocious 😂

Actually, Adrrian Monk a lot of people write their Zero's like that and I can prove it, and then what. You can buy me a meal....you can make me a meal to celebrate me proving you wrong. With wine and I get to go on a date with your assistance.

So sherry married a bully and the man who framed her for stealing in middle school?

@sarahberkner

Жыл бұрын

No it was a different person.

@gabrielbaynunn2418

Жыл бұрын

U mean like bullying a man into forking over part of his income to his ex or else....?!

@cilva7able

Жыл бұрын

@@gabrielbaynunn2418 She married the man who framed her in middle school. He was a bully then, and now he's a criminal.

So she knew he was a bad guy . Used monk. After all these years. She finally gets with the good guy .After she gets all the money. From her x. And playing the victim the hole time.

Alimony is so Biden lol. It’s whey as maids haha.

The kid monk actor is a terrible actor

@sarahberkner

Жыл бұрын

Wrong, he does a great job acting like Monk if you watch the full episode.

@Norbingel

Жыл бұрын

@@sarahberkner I've watched it many times. To each his own. I think the kid's terrible.

@a.g.demada5263

11 ай бұрын

​@@sarahberkneryes, he's really good

I don't like this episode because it always was stated the disorder he has came from his wife's murder, with a car bomb, but this makes him seem like he was born with his ticks and stuff Also, this woman gave him a severed decomposing plant that was sitting in her warm oily hairy scalp, TWICE!! why does she hate him so much??

@divyabadri9787

9 ай бұрын

This isn’t even the only episode that indicates that his quirks existed before Trudy died; it’s established many times in the series that everything got worse after her death