A few people are mentioning unions, remember that Canada and Europe also have robust unions, and even more people get to be members because the transit systems are much bigger!

@johnflorance4356

Жыл бұрын

It's not about unions, it's 100% machine politics and incompetence. Big city politics in the US states that infrastructure is a tool used to buy votes, not improve the city. This is why our costs are so high and our outcomes are so bad. The US has extreamly disfuncional politics right now and it's horrifying to watch

@leftwing831

Жыл бұрын

As others have mentioned. The Unions have to approve the project before it is built, the Union approving driverless vehicles would be a vote to be unemployed and is extremely unlikely to happen

@BlargleRagequit

Жыл бұрын

We need a social change in the US before we can do something like this in municipal and regional transit systems. The unions here have no choice but to preserve jobs on trains, because its the only way to preserve the livelihoods of their members. As long as employment is the only route to basic survival in the US the route we're going will remain the correct one. That's the difference between unions' decisions here and in Europe.

@railotaku

Жыл бұрын

@@leftwing831 it's easier do handle unions with an all new line than to convert an existing one. Paris has managed it with the notoriously militant French Unions so it can be done

@jonathanj8303

Жыл бұрын

Unions can be and are an issue in Europe though, particularly when they, not infrequently, regard transit and public services as a job creation scheme run solely for their benefit, and not an actual service for use by the public. TfL has had a policy for years of setting up to move the system -except actual trams, buses and similar- over to total automated operation at some future point, simply because of the unions' habit of holding London to ransom every time they can. At one point TfL had a complete moratorium on hiring new tube drivers for several years, I don't know if that's still in effect.

In a shocking reversal of his historic opinion, Reese is advocating for more frequent transit using automated skytrain type light metros.

@thechurchoflogic1670

Жыл бұрын

Yeah a job killer. He doesn't know how Union proud the U.S is.

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

Yes, completely out of the blue here

@neolithictransitrevolution427

Жыл бұрын

@@RMTransit I do think they are the best form of transit for dense, mixed use and missing middle type communities, which in turn are the best type of city planning. Particularly working alongside trans to offer longer distances intercity service.

@katrinabryce

Жыл бұрын

The Docklands Light Railway is an automated skytrain type light metro, and he has said mostly good things about it.

@blackwatch6649

Жыл бұрын

@@katrinabryce I believe you're missing the joke.

This is a masterclass dismantling of the American psychology around transit. Your deep understanding of this topic really shines in this one.

One thing about the Phoenix light rail, it usually runs every 10-15 minutes but is at decreased capacity because of construction. That’s why it is 20 minutes rn

Was recently at JFK and Orlando airports. Both have automated people movers with platform screens doors. Crazy that we can't imagine building this anywhere else.

@bubbledoubletrouble

Жыл бұрын

Airports tend to have a smaller population of NIMBYs.

@AlphaGeekgirl

Жыл бұрын

@@bubbledoubletrouble There are dozens of airports in the US with people movers that also have NIMBYs, so please provide sources to support your claim. I guess it’s just your opinion rather than fact.

@RobertWilke

Жыл бұрын

@@AlphaGeekgirl The fact is not so much NIMY's but airports usually are a closed route on their property. There they can do whatever system they want. Where this falls apart is when you need some kind of rail service to the airport. Many of these places run through arears that need new right of way. Try doing that in NYC. They had perfectly good line that was closed decades ago. There was a push to reactivate it and extend it. Basically running from Brooklyn through Queens and the Bronx. That got killed for making an park out of it like the high line. It's these backward ideas that's holding much of this up.

@bubbledoubletrouble

Жыл бұрын

@@AlphaGeekgirl If you can find a counterexample to my assertion that no US airport has any permanent residential housing on the runways, terminals, or other port facilities, I will readily state that I was wrong.

@williamhuang8309

Ай бұрын

The funny thing is that the JFK Airtrain literally uses the same technology as the Vancouver Skytrain. So they literally built a light metro system for their airport people mover.

The hardest thing in creating good transit is to make officials work together and select the best options.

I think Phoenix's tram is kind of an example of how things can go wrong, given on a per mile basis it cost as much as the REM in Montreal which is entirely grade separated.

@alexhaowenwong6122

Жыл бұрын

Apples to oranges. Building anything on airport land will cost a premium compared to building the same project anywhere else especially if that anywhere else reuses a ton of existing railway ROWs.

@ZontarDow

Жыл бұрын

@@alexhaowenwong6122 Phoenix's tram goes around the airport, not on or under it, unlike the REM which does go under Montreal's airport, and the part of the REM that's on an old existing rail ROW was less then a third of the network.

@tyonstead6676

Жыл бұрын

You're right that Montreal is getting more bang for the buck, but you also have to remember Phoenix has way more roads and bridge build specifically to interfere with interurban rail. You can't get people to switch to a worst mode of transportation unless they believe it is an improvement and what better way to make it an improvement by comparison than to devalue and destroy the competition (we have all herd of when GM bought and ripped out most of the streetcars tracks, but the reason they were able to do that is after lobbying cars were allowed to drive directly on the tracks significantly slowing the frequincy and reliability of urban rail, makeing people belive it is outdated form of technology that needed to change, when all that has chages was now someone was trying to and succeeded at cripple its service) If you're interested in the history of land use abuse by the US government I would recommend watching Strong Towns and Urban3 founders video on the evolution of local land tax in the US it is actually a lot more interesting then you would imagine and explains a lot of why thing are the way they are.

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

@@alexhaowenwong6122 to be fair a large portion of the REM is on new right of way and it’s not like Phoenix couldn’t have found right of ways to work with!

@trainluvr

Жыл бұрын

@@alexhaowenwong6122 REally? Land acquisition costs potentially zero, no NIMBYS and the whole environment can be designed from scratch to include the guideway. stations and yard.

In my opinion, in the US and Canada, its not the transportation but the destinations (stations). Most stations aren't worth going to, there is nothing there usually but a parking lot. If you're going to drive to a station, might as well just drive to your desired location. Exclusionary zoning and parking requirements pretty much makes a city sprawl horizontally which makes places to go more spread out, inconvenient to walk, and makes car travel necessary. Low density = low frequency of coincidental destinations = inefficient public transport.

@RobertWilke

Жыл бұрын

It wasn't that way years ago. You'd have rail lines that had terminal right in the heart of town. You know what happened? The car and the freight lines closing those routes. Oh the stations are still there and some are quite well maintained. There's just no train for it. I will agree though they're not making the new stops convenient for anyone other than parking lots. One example. They opened up a new modern station as part of a redevelopment of an old manufacturing plant. Said plant sit between two towns. Where they put the current development it has Apartment complexes, Townhomes and some shopping. Eventually baseball fields and the like. Where they made the station you basically are looking at a half hour to 45 minute walk through the industrial park with no proper path. Oh if you have a car there's a beautiful parking lot attached to it. This is the kind of thinking we have here in the states, not much.

Its funny you bring up the Copenhagen metro. I am Danish and lived many years in Copenhagen, now moved to Seoul which has the best network and cleanest stations I've used (also I speak korean so that helps compared to tourists), but the trains stop at midnight, whereas Copenhagen is 24/7 and really frequent... Here I feel like im forced to plan around that stop/start period, whereas I never had to worry about time in Copenhagen.

@cheef825

Жыл бұрын

Lmao sitting around in hongdae for an hour or two after a night at the club is a part of the Seoul experience 😂

@jonasrothmann1536

Жыл бұрын

@@cheef825 I did it just last Sunday. I live in Gangnam so dont really wanna spend 20k more after already wasting all my money on alcohol

@lzh4950

Жыл бұрын

@@cheef825 Heard from a Japanese KZreadr that meanwhile in Japan, many people spend the night in karaoke clubs to wait for the next day's 1st train if they miss the last one for the day, since renting a room in such clubs is cheaper than capsule hotels

@cheef825

Жыл бұрын

@@lzh4950 yeah we do that too, PC bang also clutch

I think a video dedicated to Disney World transit would be interesting... monorails, Sky Liners, boats, trams, buses (3rd largest bus fleet in Florida), MinnieVan ride sharing... even the People Mover, functional steam locomotives and the Main Street horse and carriage and double-decker bus. Edit: @Reese if you ever decide to do this video, I know some Disney transportation experts who would probably be open to doing something together on this.

@neolithictransitrevolution427

Жыл бұрын

I think the system is overvalued, but I agree it would be worth a video, particularly in a comparison video. Soon they'll have a connection to brightline. Covering the funding might be neat.

@ZontarDow

Жыл бұрын

The People Mover doesn't really count since it's just a ride whose only station is its ride entrance. But it is an impressive network they have connecting the different resorts, parks and attractions.

@ccudmore

Жыл бұрын

@@ZontarDow It was meant to be a technology demonstrator, showing a 1960s vision of what future transit could look like

@ZontarDow

Жыл бұрын

@@ccudmore Yeah but it's one that sort of failed since it requires everything be level, and was such a maintenance issue that the one in DisneyLand had its magnets replaced by motorised wheels. The only similar system ever built outside of it was the one connecting Congress to the auxiliary offices.

@GilesWells

Жыл бұрын

I think the coolest new "transportation" system at Disney World (and Disneyland) is the first ship you get on when riding Rise of the Resistance. The reactions from guests that aren't prepared for the standard theme park preshow / line to be turned on its head is amazingly hilarious to watch.

Growing up in Atlanta I always joked how great the Plane Train is at ATL (Platform screen doors, super clean, super frequent, automated, dislike the rubber tires tho) vs the actual subway MARTA (trains old AF, regular platforms, headways of up to 20 min sometimes, never clean). It's funny too because I'll be at the airport with "anti-transit" people and they'll love the Plane Train and I'm like "This is what all our transit could be like if we funded it right 😭"

@crowmob-yo6ry

3 ай бұрын

I blame the evil tyrant Kevin Leonpacher.

This video really goes hand in hand with CityNerd's video on lifestyle centers. It is intriguing how very suburban places have more mixed-use development and better transit than some of North America's heavy hitters like Houston, and less remarkable places like London😐.

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

Yep it really is astounding, Houston for example doesn't even have night buses!

Have you ever thought of looking at urban rail transit in Africa? A number countries have light rail and metro. South Africa , Egypt, Ethiopia, etc… Would be interested in your take on the matter!

@jeSuisbar

Жыл бұрын

I saw China building light rail in Addis Ababa. I heard they are planning to build a high speed rail in northern Africa. Interesting!!!

I just connected through O'Hare and used the ATS system to get from Terminal 5 to Terminal 1. Automated, rubber tires, platform doors... *chef's kiss*

@winterwatson6811

Жыл бұрын

rubber tires may be smoother, but i could do without the air pollution they produce

@hobog

Жыл бұрын

@@winterwatson6811 is it worse than iron dust from steel wheels on rails?

Morgantown, WV has had an automated people mover since 1975. Larger US cities with higher budgets should have no excuses.

I think you're missing the land right of way problem. No one will file a NEQA suit or similar for an airport people mover, and they're basically immune to NIMBYism. That's why they can get built!

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

But that sort of implies that what transit agencies build today is immune to lawsuits etc, which isn’t true!

@civlover1558

Жыл бұрын

@@RMTransit I mean the other way around, airport transit is immune (or pretty close) to lawsuits aiming to stop it getting built. That sort of harassment may be why Phoenix went for road right of way, which makes light rail much easier than a grade seperated system.

The more videos you do on US systems the more I want to see a video on Cleveland. It’s the last place people likely think about for mass transit. Yet, it has one line, similar to Ottawa’s current system but it runs to the airport completely grade separated end to end. You can get an all day pass for $5 and it has an LRT line with branches. Plus they have priority lights for regular busses. Even if not worthy of a video I think you’d enjoy doing research on it. I can see it now though, most under appreciated metro system in the most under appreciated American city. Nonetheless, keep the great videos coming!

@cmbakerxx

Жыл бұрын

The infrastructure exists in Cleveland, unfortunately the service is horrible and the rail rolling stock is well past its useful life. So the results is an under utilized system that is under constant budget constraints.

@cabasse_music

Жыл бұрын

agreed on both of those fronts - cleveland is a sleeper even in the midwest/great lakes. i think it's got the best bones outside of chicago

@michaelvavala3088

Жыл бұрын

@@cmbakerxx that's a shame to hear and to be honest I've never been on it. It shouldn't surprise me though as I know the city proper is half the population it was at its peak and is subject to the usual rust belt restraints but I think because I'm just an optimist at heart I only see its potential.

@williamerazo3921

Жыл бұрын

@@cmbakerxx agency has been on a death spiral since 2004. No help from the state or county government and declining youth tax base. We had local circulators, downtown Muni buses, express bus, flyer bus, lsurburban buses and Rail trains ever 6 mins and services to Cleveland Browns Staduim. We now have no rail to the staduim since 2020 and don’t know when the bridge will be replaced and all the services I mentioned is basically non existent. Coach buses are gone besides 1 route . Rail every 20 minutes. Green line shut down at 9 p even during events. Rail cars need replacement for both platform fleets. It’s a sad sad to look at it

Our expectations of US rapid transit are so low that even having platform screen doors would amaze me

@AlphaGeekgirl

Жыл бұрын

You’re right, I read in another comment from someone who seemed amazed, and I was scratching my head because it’s normal everywhere else in the (developing 😝) world

By law in the US, any application for federal subsidy of metropolitan transit must be pre-approved by the local transit unions. That means there can not be automated trains without operators. Airport systems are paid for from a different pocket, and (as far as I know) do not suffer from the same disability. As for Phoenix, the builders of the very expensive system were mostly voters with influence, the users are mostly not voters and have no influence. The political purpose of the system (which was to attract federal funds to subsidize the construction industry) was fulfilled when it was built. Operation is optional. The tiny operators union doesn't have enough importance to improve frequency of service.

@highway2heaven91

Жыл бұрын

Then how does Miami operate the Metromover downtown? Or how does Detroit operate the peoplemover as shown in the video?

@hobog

Жыл бұрын

@@highway2heaven91 I feel that they'd get the same issue if they actually comprised a backbone of their city transit

@joermnyc

Жыл бұрын

Prior to fairly recently, there was a Federal law that prevented mass transit from directly servicing airports. This is why there’s the “airport train” that you have to transfer to, instead of a one seat ride like almost everywhere else on the planet. I wasn’t able to figure out the reason for this law.

@mtgibbs

Жыл бұрын

@@joermnyc Are you certain about that? Cleveland installed rapid transit service into the terminal in the 1960s and Chicago has had L service to O'Hare since 1983 and service to Midway since 1993, all directly to the airport with no connection needed.

@TMD3453

Жыл бұрын

I was in Phoenix and could get around the whole area- Phoenix, Tempe, Scottsdale- pretty easily but 20 minute wait is true. It’s very spread out most places and that’s probably a challenge for transit.

The Detroit People Mover runs every 3-5 minutes with 99% reliability. It only goes around downtown, but then again it's a downtown people mover. It does a pretty good job of what it was meant to do, and people do ride it. I'm surprised to see it brought up in this video when it was literally created by a federal program that was seeking to apply what was accomplished with airport people movers to urban environments. It's sort of half way between airport people mover and light metro.

Good video, as an ATLien I think about this every time I go to the airport and compare Marta to the plane train. Its just hard to understand why we haven't taken the plane train experience and applied it in other places, especially since the city owns and operates the airport.

@trainluvr

Жыл бұрын

Pittsburgh PATs failure (SKYBUS) is every airport's success.

@timothylolley6302

Жыл бұрын

I thought the state took over the airport a few years ago.

@bearcubdaycare

Жыл бұрын

@@colormedubious4747 The light rail in Denver mostly has elevated stations and tracks, with long pedestrian wallets to get to the stations. And as Reese says, running at grade, especially in the CBD, creates conflicts and delays. And costs for drivers that lead to low frequency that negate any convenience benefit. I think that he made the argument well for grade separated automation and high frequency, low cost, over the expensive but inconvenient at grade worst of all worlds.

@chuck2453

Жыл бұрын

@@timothylolley6302 nope but they tried

@wckdaintgood

Жыл бұрын

I actually like our metro system in Atl. Would be cool if they expanded it tho

WMATA used to use, and will supposedly again soon, an automated system for operating trains. It still requires an operator to be behind the controls of every train. So you get the benefit of automation but without the cost savings on personnel. As some others have pointed out in comments, US Labor Unions have some pretty big control over these actions that don't affect airport systems. Airports also have dedicated funding lacking in most major metro areas by comparison for installing train systems. Finally, IAD still has to use the people movers for certain areas of its terminals and for international passengers being taken to customs.

1:52 “even tho the Disney parks…” shows universal

This is a really great point. You wonder why the thinking isn't transferable from people-movers to metros. Maybe a short automated system seems affordable, whereas a long one seems wasteful? It doesn't make sense.

God I hope HART turns out to be an inspiration for the rest of the country. It's utterly maddening to see city after city throw the same low-floor LRVs at every problem, build them dedicated transitways, and then run them 4 times an hour. It's so dispiriting to drive around Portland and see MAX tracks empty all the time.

@GenericUrbanism

Жыл бұрын

I have no hope for metro systems in this country. Politicians here refuse to build metro systems because of hart.

The ‘Plane Train’ in Atlanta is incredible and I believe it’s the best transit line in the US.

@crowmob-yo6ry

3 ай бұрын

I blame the evil tyrant Kevin Leonpacher.

Don’t forget the every 20 minute Tempe Streetcar. Phoenix’s system is expanding 😍

@CityLifeinAmerica

Жыл бұрын

@@grahamturner2640 Not entirely a "tempe" thing, There is a reason why they renamed it from Tempe Streetcar to Valley Metro streetcar. That being said, it gets stuck in traffic, and they should have just built a regular light rail, or pedestrianized Mill Ave.

As someone from honolulu...I was shocked that someone actually talked about HART on a transit channel lol.

@Gunter909

Жыл бұрын

And the cost of the HART and the fact that it won't make it to your regional shopping mall. I agree the HART should be covered more regularly.

@TonyW79SFV

Жыл бұрын

Honolulu HART is doing something that mainland U.S. transit agencies aren't and that is platform screen doors, hence the mention in this video. U.S. rail projects are very costly as it is compared to similar projects outside the U.S. I remember when NYC MTA proposed the Second Avenue Subway, they proposed to have platform screen doors, but that option was quickly removed as project costs rose. I've been following the HART project, even though it will nicely serve Daniel K. Inouye Int'l Airport (HNL) without an APM, it'll miss lots of trip generators like Ala Moana Center (mall), UH Manoa (Hawaii's flagship university), & Waikiki (a major tourist destination). Many of those were in the original plans from a few decades ago, only to slowly get removed as project costs rose.

@meijiishin5650

Жыл бұрын

@@Gunter909 Not entirely true. The plan is still to get to Ala Moana with a later extension.

@crowmob-yo6ry

3 ай бұрын

I blame the evil tyrant Pavos Prevedorous.

The plane train in Atlanta is actually the busiest airport people mover in the world! In a city with crumbling public transit we really oughta learn something from this.

@wwsciffsww3748

Жыл бұрын

MARTA on the whole is certainly inadequate and undersized for the amount of people in the region. However, I am optimistic that in terms of rail we are heading in the right direction. We have a new set of amazing trains coming in the near future (check out the VR walkthrough MARTA posted literally today), every station can now have 6-8 car trains (once Bankhead's upgrades are finished), and TODs are popping up at so many of the stations. I believe that MARTA's rail system is more future-proof than most people think, and we have arguably the best airport connection in the US (with the busiest airport in the world). As for expansion it doesn't seem likely that we get more heavy rail anytime soon, but light rail projects such as the Clifton corridor and the Streetcar extension to and along the Beltline would be great (if they ever got built). As for the bus network, they are cutting some of the lines that are the least used and focusing more on the more popular lines, which makes sense (unless you are one of the few people that use the least used lines). There are BRT projects such as Summerhill and Clayton County that would be able to serve a lot of people.

@MarloSoBalJr

Жыл бұрын

The problem with Atlanta is that urban sprawl is pretty unorganized. Other than sending the Red & Orange due south into Clayton County, anywhere else is full of suburbia with no good way of determining which dense area is worth spending that billion dollars to build a rail line

I was glad that he mentioned HART in Honolulu since it fulfills a lot of the positive transit attributes that he’s advocating.

Makes me wonder how much it would cost to automate our traditional metros. LA's subway would be a good candidate for trying this. Maybe Chicago too since it's not too large but deals with a variety of weather conditions

@jarjarbinks6018

Жыл бұрын

Some lines in Chicago maybe could (I’d say maybe the red line?). Some of the El lines cross each other which may inhibit automation. There are also a few grade crossings across the CTA network

@drdewott9154

Жыл бұрын

It really depends but even large scale systems are ripe for automation these days as we see with the likes of the Montreal REM being built right now, and Copenhagen S train which will become automated in a decade or so. As of the US, its a bit hard to know where to start, but something like DC's Red line would be a good place to start since its relatively modern and isolated, making it a solid testing ground. LA's Red and Purple lines could work, but in most other cases there's either too much interlining or too much interaction with on street traffic like level crossings for it to be an easy conversion.

@KyrilPG

Жыл бұрын

They could always ask RATP for a consultancy job on existing line's switch to full automation without daily closure. RATP is quite experienced with that, it has transformed 2 of Paris' busiest lines while maintaining them in operations 19 hours a day.

@applesyrupgaming

Жыл бұрын

los angeles building trams will be revealed as a poor decision when they add tod and the trams get swamped

@CraziFuzzy

Жыл бұрын

LA doesn't have a subway, it has metro lines that are occasionally underground - and then through much of their line are littered with at-grade crossings, so automation would not be ideal - that said, level of service is already quite good on most LA metro lines.

The newest light rail line in Guadalajara Mexico is impressive, clean, and efficient. Skytrain outside the core but runs underground within the urban core. Inexpensive, also.

Thank you Reece. San Diego is proposing an APM (not cable pulled but self propelled) connecting airport to Downtown. They realized building a Trolley branch to the airport would only dilute frequencies off a trunk line that will only explode in demand given $10B+ in TOD being built along the main Trolley routes (before including Downtown TOD).

@GenericUrbanism

Жыл бұрын

Is it going to be rejected and not built?

@alexhaowenwong6122

Жыл бұрын

@@GenericUrbanism It will be built almost for sure if they come up with enough funding.

Regarding Phoenix's rail, I totally see where you're coming from on its flaws, but I would argue it's actually taken a couple (modest) steps to pull some parts of the city near the center closer together, and make popular commutes a little more manageable for riders. When you look at Phoenix, it's almost a special case for its sheer size and land area scale. It's just gonna take a much more concerted effort to get great service there than in other more dense cities. Also, as of 2022, service has returned to a 15-min frequency and running through 1 a.m.

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

When I looked at the schedule, that wasn’t what it said, good to hear that if it’s true, though

I live in Phoenix AZ and just rode the airport people mover (PHX Sky Train) extension that JUST OPENED TODAY! I was pleased how fast you can now get from Terminal 4 to the consolidated rental car facility in just 8 minutes. I have been meticulously watching as construction over the last 5 years. The shuttle buses that it replaced were much slower and frequently maxed out causing riders to wait for the next shuttle. A future west terminal is planned and yet the APM will at some point run four car trains. Thank you very much for this video and Toronto Transit channel for the stock footage.

@schwenda3727

Жыл бұрын

Wonder if Orlando is getting any additional people movers between the baggage claims & the new Brightline at bare minimum or eventually directly to the rental car place opposite FL-528…

Woohoo Lille. Loved their subway system when I lived there.

Thoughts on the Miami Metromover? Its a free APM serving the downtown area. An example of APM outside of airport setting.

Unions in the US would likely push back heavily if a line was retrofitted to use automated trains, as that would mean operators are meaningless, and would complain, rightly or wrongly, about safety being an issue with automated trains. When I say safety, that could be crime, that could also be the passengers if the automated trains malfunction, and other issues that could fall under safety. If a transit agency pushes through with getting rid of operators, then strikes across their whole network are inevitable. It’s for different reasons, but look at the power the RMT has in the UK

@AaronSmith-sx4ez

Жыл бұрын

If we can automate Teslas, we can automate trains which are significantly simpler. Unions should not be able to block progress.

@PhilliesNostalgia

Жыл бұрын

@@AaronSmith-sx4ez But drivers aren’t unions. That’s a false equivalence

@highway2heaven91

Жыл бұрын

Then how does the Miami metromover or Detroit peoplemover exist?

@PhilliesNostalgia

Жыл бұрын

@@highway2heaven91 Because that was the technology that was used. The consortium that sold that tech to Toronto for Line 3 also sold it to Detroit. Detroit still barely has a public transit system, so when there is no one to p*** off, you’re gravy. Metromover did come after Metrorail, so either the union there was weak, or there wasn’t a union. SEPTA’s workers keep striking because SEPTA can be an idiot sometimes, so imagine taking away the union’s power by decreasing it’s membership by automating the BSL and MFL. That strike would go on for probably 3 months. Couple that with this happening during CBA negotiations, and you get a stoppage on the whole network. Amtrak may be fine

4:58 Reece: every 20 minutes Screenshot: every 5 minutes

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

Screwed up this screenshot 😥 see the one at 5:51

Loving all the great content over Christmas!

I think a rubber tyred system probably makes some sense if you want a 24hr service, as it moves maintenance onto the vehicles, which is simpler to manage whilst maintaining service.

I got subscribed last week. We, in deep South America, have modern metro Systems, too. The new lines in Santiago and São Paulo systems are example and the new Ligh Rail in Rio de Janeiro.

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

Yep! I have a video on Santiago!

Very good point! Covid has really brought the staffing shortage to light. And all this time many people were thinking that it was just about schedule frequency are car maintenance. However, if you have a shortage of people to drive your trains, everything else... Goes out the window.

came here from nebula to say great essay, reece. i know that trolls be trolls, but it’s pretty funny to see their comments here on a video where you talk up an area of american transit expertise. i don’t know if they’re bots or just not that bright either way, i am a big fan of automated metros, but i don’t want anything to do with rubber tired systems and their air pollution, especially underground. take care!

In the US it's never a problem of ability. It is always a problem of will, concessions, and inertia. Our democratic institutions and agency structures are often more about equally representing places than people. It is a problem for urbanism because a city is one place with a lot of people while everywhere else is everywhere else and has fewer people. So who ends up winning? Airports are closed, planned, locations where everything is infrastructure, and everyone who at least has a little money uses it. There's less area to contend with and less people to have a say to block it, and all those everywhere else's with a lot of people feel more invested. What would be an interesting video is exploring funding and governance structures for successfu and growing vs floundering transit systems and how those structures impact success and planning. Like maybe compare LA Metro to SEPTA.

second video I’ve seen of yours. Very good content. Keep it up.

Totally agree with everything you said here. For example, here in Detroit at Metro Airport's McNamara Terminal, there is a perfectly modern-standard automated people mover running along the terminal's concourse to get people to the far gates quickly. If we can have this technology in our airports, then what's stopping us from implementing it in our cities?

@ConeheadS281

Жыл бұрын

I’m shocked

I give you a lot of credit, Reece: you make a compelling argument for rapid transit, but you DO realize that this is the U.S., right? There is no political will to build grade-separated metro systems. I'd use a light rail system if it ran with frequency and avoided vehicular traffic because at least that would be trying to keep travel modes separated. Car-centric cities that build light rail systems that run in mixed traffic seems like a waste to me, but that's the only middle ground that can be achieved when cars get so much priority, transit (in Sun Belt cities especially) has a poverty stigma attached to it, and no one wants to pay for it. Anyway, good video. 👍

I agree that almost all future Metro systems should be driverless, totally separated right of ways to traffic that way the two don’t affect each other. What I would offer to make sure drivers don’t get nervous is give them six months worth of severance pay or a job as a controller in the control centre.

Hey, watched this on Nebula but came here to post a comment. Three things. 1. Valley Metro is adding an extension on Center Street south of DT Phoenix which will break the long tram line into two lines in 2024. A North-South Line and a East-West Line. 2. Frequency is back to every 15 minutes now, was 20 minutes because of ridership numbers. 3. I ride Valley Metro every day, and every day the trains are delayed. It's quite obvious to me that trains are delayed as a mix of sitting in traffic and the shear length of the line. Hopefully we can improve the times with two lines and better light priority.

There's some irony in that making the case for the "guiding example" of airport trams, this video focuses on what I (and perhaps others) think is the worst airport tram in the US. The PHX SkyTrain serves no purpose for most passengers. It connects terminals pre-security, but PHX is laid out in such a way that few if any passengers will be connecting between terminals. It also doesn't (yet) connect to the rental car center, which is where most people from out of town need to go (given the metro area's setup and structure.) The track has been laid and the stations built, but the extension to the rental car center has been "in testing" for the better part of the year. This has been a huge tease, because the bus to the PHX rental car center is unequivocally the second worst rental car bus in the country (after DFW.) It's crowded, there isn't enough service, and it's a long drive from T4 (which carries the bulk of PHX's traffic.) Aside from the yet to open rental car extension, and besides connecting terminals land-side, which has no utility for 95% of passengers, the PHX airport tram also connects to an economy parking garage (yay!) and--as mentioned in the video--the light rail system, which also as mentioned, is slow and unreliable. I'd enjoy a mini series on airport trams. Better systems to focus on in the US would be Tampa (the first,) Dallas (the largest, I think, and very useful,) and Atlanta (the busiest, and also very useful.) The Atlanta PlaneTrain has a lot in common, arguably, with Paris Metro Line 1. Stations are a similar distance, trains are rubber tire, and they are both automated. It would also be interesting to compare the different airport tram systems that populate the world--i.e. Bombardier APM vs. Mitsubishi Crystal Mover vs. VAL.

The frequency on Valley Metro Rail is actually relatively inconsistent and ranges between 12-20 minutes according to Valley Metro. Also the PHX SkyTrain can operate at a frequency of as often as every 2 minutes at peak periods

@leftwing831

Жыл бұрын

Some of the busiest systems in the world run 20 minute frequencies on the weekend this was deliberately misleading from him

@tidefan211

Жыл бұрын

@@leftwing831 maybe on an outer branch line sure, but on the main city center trunk line??

@CityLifeinAmerica

Жыл бұрын

@@leftwing831 I am from Phoenix, trains can come as little as 8 minutes to as much as 20. But during peak times it is usually around 10-15 mins. Streetcar is every 20, and streetcar wasn't even mentioned at all.

AirTrain JFK is very similar to SkyTrain and I’ve taken it to fly out to LA and to do a photo shoot at the TWA hotel. Sure it costs a premium (was $7.75, now $8 one way) and it doesn’t connect to the city center but it does the job when I take it from Jamaica station (I take the LIRR using the $5 CityTicket over the subway since its faster). The Port Authority wants to replace the AirTrain in Newark with a JFK-style rail system (currently a monorail but it’ll take long b/c they’re in the process of building new terminals to replace outdated ones from the 70’s and would rather build a new people mover when the new terminals are complete) and they tried to build one in LaGuardia but the alignment was at the worst possible way and is currently in the planning phase again. Personally I think it should connect to Astoria, Willets Point, and Jamaica plus allow a LaGuardia to JFK AirTrain route for riders and workers. Also, you mentioned about platform extensions on Airport people mover but not on urban rail systems, The Path is extending their platforms to allow more train cars on their trains.

@drakeil

Жыл бұрын

The original plan was to have the Air Train got from LGA to Jamaica then to JFK but the NIMBY's killed that idea. The latest one is to extend the Astoria MTA elevated to LGA with 2 stations in the airport.

@97nelsn

Жыл бұрын

@@drakeil Now that I didn’t know, but still it should be suggested on top of the N/W extension to LGA.

I think it would be awesome to see you talk about the Boston T and the commuter rail, despite being one of the oldest transit systems it's really not kept up that well, but there's still so much incredible stuff to the rails I use every day!

This was a fascinating video, many thanks for raising so many excellent points. Plenty of food for thought, in America's car-obsessed culture.

@jameshitselberger5845

Жыл бұрын

Car-obsesed public policy.....Americans behave just like Europeans in Europe and visa versa. Europeans drive cars when they are in the U.S. They would rarely do anything else simply because of the lack of alternatives. The US government takes our taxes and borrows money for highways, not rail. The public has never been given the power to vote down highways, but that has been the case for public transportation, education, eyc..

The key reason we in the US are able build airport people movers that are better than some transit systems is because of how they are funded. US airport infrastructure is funded by a per passenger tax on flights. A metro train will have funding from various local, state and federal taxes. This is also the reason the JFK airport areo train is built the way it it.

It's definitely unions. It an airport builds a people mover, it is starting from scratch-a new agency with no existing union. If a city already has a metro, then that union will block it being automated. If a city is building a brand new rail line, chances are the organization tasked to do so is the local bus company-and the bus drivers already have a union and will block it being automated.

Elephant in the room: Airport transit is "acceptable" to upper middle class and upper-class white-collar professional riders who largely live in car-centric suburban subdivisions of endless McMansions, the type of people who would usually turn their noses up at buses, trains and other forms of mass transit. They like the small-scale, limited-use novelty of these people mover systems in airports or large amusement parks, just not in everyday use. Transit systems in the United States are deeply associated with urban ills, with crowded, dirty trains filled with creepy people and an air of violence or mayhem just around the corner. Americans may complain about urban traffic but really don't want to remedy it, just escape it.

@JesusChrist-qs8sx

15 күн бұрын

American middle class and upper middle class aren't any different from the middle class people of other countries, and most denser urban areas would absolutely be able to get high ridership rates...if the system were useful! But show me a single American city with a comprehensive, reliable transit system that can take you anywhere without sacrificing your quality of life..and you'll show me Manhattan. Because it's the only place with transit useful to the average person. And shocker, the average person living in Manhattan takes the subway, whether they're poor, rich, or middle class. Middle class people don't take transit because it sucks and they can afford cars, not because they're all a bunch of stuck up professionals who only like trains when they're a novelty. That kind of generalization isn't helpful

Amazing video with lots to think about!

So many videos, sweet!

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

And more to come happy holidays!

9:55 it is again, after briefly losing its spot in 2020, it became the busiest airport again in the year 2021.

2:20 Riverline Light Rail Camden to Trenton, NJ began on Sunday 2004 March 14. Insanely packed inaugural ride.

The every 20 minute light rail in Phoenix is on weekends only. Weekday trains run every 15. And for the 13 or so years of operation prior to COVID they ran every 12 minutes. I wish 5-train-per hour service would return, but this is still the best service in a city where even major arterial roads have only hourly bus service.

@AlphaGeekgirl

Жыл бұрын

If you check on the video those trains that were supposedly 15 minutes apart for all seven minutes late, so effectively they are 20 minutes apart 😂

hey, i don't know if you ever came to Portugal but basically we have two major metropolitan areas, Lisbon and Porto, and both have a metro system, Lisbon has a underground metro and Porto has a elevated metro (?) It still looks like a ligh rail or tram to me but wtv. anyways, maybe you could make a video comparing underground metro vs overground metro and what pros and cons they both have In Portugal a lot of people say the Porto's Metro is better because it was cheaper to build and covers a bigger area than Lisbon's Metro, I personally prefer the underground but I'm curious about your thoughts

Love the vid❤❤

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!

Newark AirTrain kinda feels like a themepark ride, and you’ll probably be at 2-3 transfers to get anywhere in the tri-state. That being said, at least it has one (unlike LGA), and connecting to the Northeast corridor is a massive plus.

I think that often the problem is the local authorities. The U.S still prioritizes Cars over public transport and doesn't seem to be really interested in good public transport.

Another interesting example is the new Luton airport (LTN) peoplemover (the DART), to take people from the nearest train station (Luton Airport Parkway, fast trains to London and some other destinations, Thameslink and East Midlands Rail, quicker than Stansted express from STN) to the airport complex, via the mid-stay car park. There is a cost (although can be included in rail fare), but the airport also charges a drop off/pick up fee at the terminal and a flag-drop supplement (enhanced starting fare) for taxis (free pickup/dropoff at the midstay carpark with several times per hour shuttle bus) Peoplemover will be replacing a several times per hour shuttle bus (articulated, one of the now rare uses of articulated in the UK, generally no longer used in UK city centres due to some cycling fatalities on bendy routes and fare evasion due to insufficiently enforced Proof of Payment approaches) Dopplemayer cable hauled (and the route is quite long and windy for the technology). Sadly opening delayed due to some technical issues, and there has been cost overruns, should have been electric rather than cable hauled in my opinion. There is also another similar cable hauled mover at Birmingham (UK) International airport (BHX), connecting express trains at Birmingham International station (not city centre) and the co-located Exhibition Centre (one of the biggest exhibition spaces in the UK). This used to be maglev (one of the first, if not the first) but that was aged and became too expensive to maintain and the cheapest replacement was cable hauled.

Great video and as someone who grew up in NYC I love riding the AirTrain at JFK. It’s probably the gold standard of what a modern metro could and should look like in New York. Makes me think they should use similar SkyTrain technology should the Interborough Express ever gets built, particularly since there are several tunnels that make up the Bay Ridge Branch ROW that are apparently too narrow to accommodate large main line LIRR style trains. The project would then need smaller IRT subway style rolling stock like what you see on the PATH train system or even the Blue Line in Boston. A smaller automated light metro might be the most ideal system to deploy. And the only place where you can find such an example of this in NYC IS the AirTrain at Kennedy.

This video both makes me sad and gives me hope. Can't really find a flaw with your arguments. And as for Phoenix... That airport people mover's new western end station at the car rental terminal is bad planning. Ought to have been built to facilitate the line being extended on so that that end of the line could also link up with the LRT. The planned north-south LRT. That way both the east-west LRT line and the north-south LRT line would have direct interchanges with the APM.

Highly interesting! Let me add one remark: it's great that you take a positive approach to the problem and point at possible (actually, obvious) solutions, rather than sticking to some sterile US bashing. Kudos for your positive mindset!

The dulles people mover is really nice and tidy and it looks really good

It’s strange how Americans are so worried about budget and project values, but at the same time don’t look the return they don’t get when they don’t do transit right. I live in São Paulo and we had a huge problem building monorails, it basically it’s being built since 2011 and it doesn’t end. So what did the government do? Give up on every future project of monorail and focusing in subways, which we have the experience and it’s a success with the population. Why US cities don’t do the same? Acknowledge your mistake and try to fix it.

The problem with creating a Modern Metro System outside of airports is that Airports usually don’t have to deal with crime, homelessness, NIMBY’s and the car-centric mentality that dominates most of America. They also don’t have to deal with government regulations or corporations. They kind of had to build modern metros because Airports were one scenario that they couldn’t find a way to shoehorn cars into. Also, at least car renters can think about the convenience of trains while they’re riding to the car rental lot 👍

@CityLifeinAmerica

Жыл бұрын

Airports are like train stations, the car industry tried to shoehorn their way into them, and failed miserably. Though unfortunately airports have a lot of parking built as well....if only we can get rid of those and force people to take transit into the airport.

Prior to fairly recently (around the time the LaGuardia airport train was paused) there was a bewildering Federal law preventing mass transit from directly serving airports. (A one seat ride was illegal!) This is why there’s all these Airport People Movers that have to connect to the rest of the transit system somewhere off of the airport property. (Seattle-Tacoma was able to get around this by building the station just outside of the property line (or maybe they bought that narrow strip of property from the airport authority?), it’s a pretty long walk to the terminal (through the parking structure).

When Charlotte put in their first Light Rail system, once it was running for about 1/2 year, they announced "It is more expensive to operate than we thought. We have to cancel under performing bus lines." --- So the light rail killed bus service for some of the areas north of the Downtown area. Then they built a couple of additional lines. The first was a street car line that went from a college on the west side to the location where Independence Mall used to be. (A failed mall that had gun fights inside to drive all the customers and vendors away.) So, figuring out why you need a line to an open field? Gang populations there will have to get eliminated to make that line popular... Then there is the new line heading North out of the Downtown area. They COULD have gone as far as the Charlotte Motor Speedway, which would have been a superb park and ride, and offer service when racing is going on... Rather than that, they decided to stop at the local university on that side of the city...where 90-95% of the students live within walking distance. Sorta like what happened on the original line. I asked why they didn't run it over to the two mammoth malls in Pineville? That would be "Too Expensive" -- They COULD have run the track down the median of the interstate there... Less than 2 miles from the 485 "inside the belt line" station. As luck would have it, they never went to downtown Pineville because the city saw the 3rd bump in estimated costs, and decided to drop out of the project. (I could do about a 20 minute routine on CATS and their estimates on the first line... Going from $190 million for 13 miles to almost a billion for 8.5 or whatever was a bit of a bait and switch on the part of the transit agency. I also asked about automated operation, and they said No! "We won't go there." "That would need a means to keep people and animals away from the track We can't do that"

@GenericUrbanism

Жыл бұрын

Charlotte moment. God American transit agencies are so stupid.

please make a video talking about the São Paulo metro and commuter rail! Love your channel content!

Great new video! Which one is shown at 12:16 ? ATL Airport ? And the last at 13:22 ? You're right, there are so many use cases possible for light automated metro in US cities instead of poor service LRT. Having a tremendous capacity in ridership increase, running every 6 or 8 minutes at first then increasing frequency up to a minute and a few seconds if needed plus adding more cars to the train fleet. Not *if* needed but *when* needed, as good and reliable service will create demand and attract riders like syrup attracts bees. It "only" requires a bit of vista while designing the network. That's easy to say, I know, but one can sometimes expect the needs of the public to be answered by the local authorities.

My Airport here in Pittsburgh is losing it's people mover as it is downsizing, It is quite sad, I loved the people mover, but soon instead of going through security and taking the people mover, now once you are through security you will be at the Terminal. Which I guess is better for a smaller airport

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

Sad story!

Excellent video. I hope you become the transit czar of Canada and the US!

Miami seems to have discovered the benefit of peoplemovers already. I can only speak anecdotally, but every time I’ve ridden Miamis MetroMover, it seems like it was packed. With 21,000 daily riders, the system sees (sadly) more ridership than St Louis’, Charlotte’s, and Pittsburgh’s entire light rail systems. In much of the US, I ride transit largely for the sake of riding transit and checking out the systems. But ultimately, I go out of my way to ride transit, and that’s the problem. However, as far as Miami goes, the metro mover has come in handy for me several times. It’s very well connected to all of downtown and integrates well with buses, the bright line, and the metro rail.

Your ending summarizes well why we ended up with so many trams/light rail even when studies prove that a light metro would have almost the same cost.

You also fail to mention how US metro systems are either designed to fail, or are heavily influenced by the mindset that poor/urban/POC will be the only ones using said transit in a vast majority of cities

I think you are missing a major aspect that cities in the US and Canada in general are built very differently that Europe's. It is much more difficult to create the ridership required in a typical NA city to be able to sustain the transit frequency and service level. Yes, we can do that in the airports only because there is high density of passengers that needs to be moved around in very liner, predictable patterns. Not so in the urban settings. Cars are still by far the most efficient and comfortable way to travel in NA. Efficient public transit cannot be built alone without consideration of our urban settings.

My local airport’s transit isn’t that great, but all the same, it kind of punches above its weight within the city. This is PDX. Buses on the lower roadway operate frequent service to the economy parking lots. There is just a single terminal with underground moving walkways through the local garages, rental space, and employee offices, and more moving walkways along the concourses. There is a light rail connection nearby the ticketing and baggage claim areas, large elevators (and in the tall parking garages, many smaller elevators per bank) and high-capacity escalators within the terminal. The light rail is even receiving service improvements soon and upgrades to double track throughout are under construction. Meanwhile the line near my house has been struggling with a severe local operator shortage, limiting its frequency and reliability.

There is an inherent bias against public transit in the US which is often viewed as infrastructure that’s used by the poor and the lower classes who can’t afford to drive. Airport and Disney park people movers don’t have that stigma as the ability to actually access them requires a certain level of income.

@RMTransit

Жыл бұрын

Yep, theres definitely a discussion to be had there!

Wow! Phoenix has a lot of sore spots that feel familiar to Portland. Our lack of operators put a damper on their new BRT-esque line on Division (as well as everywhere else). The BRT line was finished at a time where operators were at an all time low! Anyone attempting to use transit right now to get to work has to deal with Max trains occasionally just not coming, with seemingly no warning. Buses are routinely tens of minutes late, and it makes the entire process incredibly frustrating. When I moved to the greater metro area and out of the city proper I gave up and bought a car. :/

Great video!👍💯 Thanks for reminding me how flawed & dysfunctional the Muni Metro System is where I live in San Francisco. To come to think of it, the best transit system in the San Francisco Bay Area is the *Airtrain System at SFO Airport.* Man just realizing that makes me so sad & depressed 😔

Yay you mentioned my city! And yes, lmao, it is one super long light rail line. Honestly, it works for us! I love our light rail, but do I wish it was a metro? Yes.

Miami Metromover is a great example of an effective people mover system that works better than the city's heavy rail (Metrorail).

I would check out the JFK AirTrain in NYC. That airport people mover uses train tracks and def fits the type of transit you discussed in this video.

I just wanna say there's nothing wrong with an airport train going to a rental car facility. Local traffic at any airport is always congestedand removing shuttles from the mix is a benefit. Most importantly however is that not everyone at a given airport is visiting just the city. For example, specifically for Phoenix, many people will drive north to the Grand Canyon, Sedona, etc where other transit options are not practically available. Nor would anyone reasonably expect a robust transit solution to these far off areas. I think we should sometimes remember that in any country there are places where a train or bus does not go simply due to low demand, low population, or geographical challenges. Rental car facilities only seem bad if one only thinks of them as serving the city they are in, rather than the wider region airports often in reality support.

@1997nick

10 ай бұрын

I was looking for a comment like this because I was about to say the same thing; I live in the Phoenix area and can attest the SkyTrain has really reduced the congestion on Sky Harbor boulevard just from the rental car shuttles alone!

It's super ironic that these airports are walkable places that treat transit as a first class mode of transport, and yet no one thinks that transit can work in the US.

a great example of airport people mover is the marconi express, which runs from bologna marconi airport to the central train station of bologna in just 7 minutes, with a 7-minutes frequency.

In Phoenix they just expanded their Skytrain taking passengers to the rental car center replacing shuttle busses making it easier to get to the rental car center from the airport terminal which normally take half an hour due to waiting for a shuttle bus then then ride to the airport terminal, with this it will be half the time

I just flew out of Toronto Pearson for the first time, and holy crap I was amazed that the airport train connected with the value lots AND connected with GO Transit to downtown. I have never seen a line connect to the value lots and I have flown out of maybe 100 different airports (even at JFK you have to get off the subway and then take a connecting line to the airport)

@jaysmith1408

Жыл бұрын

I have family north of Ottawa, I fly into Pearson, jump right on the UP Express down to Union Station, get on VIA, train to Ottawa. The UP Express is fantastic. Naturally I’ve been on the airport people mover, but with as many airports as I’ve used, they’re all fairly similar, I can’t say I can tell one from another, save Heathrow’s, which if I recall correctly (I was a mere flea last time I was there) was actually a Tube that stopped at each terminal. Only airports that stand out are Charlotte’s (I don’t even think it has one, whole place is a ruddy mess), LAX’s (curbside bus, thanks a bunch) and Dulles’ planemates (certainly handy).

American airport authorities are cash cows. In a sense, their “transit systems” are self financed in that fees, not taxes, are used to build them. That makes building good transit within their area easy.

I think that this time your premise is flawed. The problem in the US is not experience in building mas transit system but getting approval and funds to build it. The people that build those systems know how it should work but do not have the resources to do it and no airport APM will change that. Airport APM are good for what they're used for, moving people to connect s a small number of points with short distances and in an airport it's required for it's operation so cost is not an issue and they use their profits to ensure they keep making them. The cost of Huston airport APM was about 400M, spread over quite a few years and not adjusted for inflation so for a 1.1km length it costed about 400M. LAX new APM is about 3.6km and the cost is 2B so about 550M per km. No public authority in the US will get even a fraction of this budget and they cannot build such a system with what they have. The people that build this try to get heir foot in the door with what they have hoping that once they start they will be able to improve and expand it later. This is not a great strategy but in mot places in the US it's the only one. As long as large investments are politically toxic there won't be good mas transit systems in the US. Maybe the younger generation will change it, if they won't change their mind by the time they'll actually start voting in elections but for now the only option if the foot in the door one.

So, using the APM model, what would be your thoughts on the Miami MetroMover? I think that is the closest public transit service that resembles an APM.

Good video, can you do an update video on the Cal HSR?