Mod Phil 6: Hegel: Logic and Dialectics [Eng]

Музыка

Fredrick Hegel argued that nature, philosophy, and history could be explained by the principles of dialectics. This lecture contextualizes Hegel in the philosophical debates of ancient Greece and the Kantian synthesis of rationalism and empiricism.
PS. A small mistake at 3:06 when I accidentally say Egyptian instead of ancient Greek philosophers.

Пікірлер: 145

  • @MuhammadAbdullah-vh3lp
    @MuhammadAbdullah-vh3lp3 жыл бұрын

    As a graduate of Law from LUMS, I have only heard about you from my peers in humanities but this was my first lecture (virtual) and I absolutely loved it. Over the past few days I have been looking for shortcuts to understand Hegel but I found out that was a futile pursuit. Finally got around to watching this and now about to watch the subsequent lecture. Please keep up the good work. Hopefully I can meet you someday on campus when things get back to normal. God bless you.

  • @cosmicwakes6443
    @cosmicwakes64433 жыл бұрын

    One of the most exciting lectures on Hegel I've had the pleasure of seeing. Thank you professor.

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    You are too kind. My pleasure.

  • @suhailmandokhel6180
    @suhailmandokhel61803 жыл бұрын

    Sir, the way you make a difficult topic so palatable and doable is absolutely awesome. Stay blessed Sir. Students from Balochistan binge-watch your lectures.

  • @dingosmith9932
    @dingosmith99323 жыл бұрын

    The last couple of paragraphs of this lecture were some of the most information packed sentences I've ever heard! Brilliant

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you.

  • @ali52952
    @ali529522 жыл бұрын

    Thank you dear Professor! Indeed this is one of the best lectures on Hegel across the world on internet

  • @dsantosh7882
    @dsantosh78823 жыл бұрын

    world class lecture love from 🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @n6962n
    @n6962n3 жыл бұрын

    O aye shehzadey....great lecture le kr....kamal he sir jee ap..

  • @allypoum
    @allypoum3 жыл бұрын

    This is great timing as I have just finished listening to the good prof's lectures on Socrates Plato & Aristotle. Highly recommended.

  • @athnuachanhm5615
    @athnuachanhm56153 жыл бұрын

    Great lecture! Would love a similar overview of Heidegger and perhaps how his thought could be interpreted and related to Marxism/Hegelianism

  • @TexTalksSometimes
    @TexTalksSometimes3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for making this, it's perfect for someone like me who just read through Marx but doesn't have time right now to dedicate to learning the foundations of it.

  • @jamessheffield4173
    @jamessheffield41733 жыл бұрын

    Love your lectures. Before I retired I had an extra job at an Indian theater showing films. Every so often I got a Pakistani film. One film had a young mam trying to convince his older brother who was studying to be a doctor to stay in Pakistan after graduation. Would like you to do a lecture in English on the brain drain. Keep up the good work and blessings.

  • @phlegmatic...4057
    @phlegmatic...40573 жыл бұрын

    Though some of your lectures/topics don't match with my education, profession or nature of personal inclination, nevertheless, I would like to listen to your all videos containing even devil's knowledge! 😅 That's the power of real teacher! ❤️ Sign of an expert of teaching! ❤️ The man who knows the art of imparting education! ❤️ Pakistan does not need anything else but only a number of 1 thousand teachers like Sir Taimur Sb, then the world will witness an other economic giant like Japan on the Asian continent! Long live sir, Long live Pakistan ❤️✌️

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Phlegmatic! wassidehraj at gmail thank you

  • @Ixam13
    @Ixam133 жыл бұрын

    Great lecture! Thank you very much. In the realm of philosophy Kant really is the centrist-in-chief. The German marxist-leninist philosopher Holz interestingly pointed out that in the late stages of the Soviet Union most of the soviet philosophers were infatued with Kant while almost no one talked about Hegel. All Kantians are revisionists.

  • @ayoubkhalil1
    @ayoubkhalil13 жыл бұрын

    Why haven't I heard of this channel before. Great work I am glad I found this.

  • @PSIR_Kumud
    @PSIR_Kumud2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you very much sir. Love and respect from Delhi.

  • @windokeluanda
    @windokeluanda3 жыл бұрын

    Congratulations! Professor Taimur Rahman so young can perform like this imagine what he is capable of in the future. My wishes of health to everybody!

  • @ManfromuncoolBlogspotstars
    @ManfromuncoolBlogspotstars3 жыл бұрын

    I'd like to add my thanks and appreciation for a superb lecture. Thank you, sir.

  • @unnunn12
    @unnunn123 жыл бұрын

    you are legit one of the best educators on KZread. thanks for doing these lectures

  • @Arafat-my6fe
    @Arafat-my6fe3 жыл бұрын

    Sir, I am from Bangladesh and I am really glad that i came across your channel today and at once, i loved the way you put your thoughts and knowledge in such an articulated manner. Keep up the amazing work. 😍

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    I am so happy to hear that. Please do encourage others to join the channel.

  • @fergusmather8184
    @fergusmather81843 жыл бұрын

    This lecture is brilliant quality. Thank you.

  • @satyamsjharkhand4674
    @satyamsjharkhand46743 жыл бұрын

    Thank you Sir for doing this. I was heartbroken when you didn't complete the Urdu Das Capital series. I am extremely overjoyed with this series. Please keep this going

  • @YounasJam
    @YounasJam3 жыл бұрын

    Great work, Professor. Would be waiting to consume more of it.

  • @Reality4Peace
    @Reality4Peace3 жыл бұрын

    Sir, your lectures are all so clear and illuminating. I'm learning so much from them. One philosopher I am eager to learn more about is Spinoza. I hope you have a lecture planned for him at some point! I would really appreciate that.

  • @bilaljumani3028
    @bilaljumani30283 жыл бұрын

    Waiting for Urdu version Sir. I learned many things from your lectures sir. Hope you'll be upload urdu version soon. We need mentor's like you sir. Lot's of Love from sindh.

  • @prof.dattukajale3481
    @prof.dattukajale34813 жыл бұрын

    I am Assist. Prof. From Mumbai University wand to follow you to make lecture in Marathi. Will you assist me. Thanks you

  • @tormunnvii3317
    @tormunnvii33173 жыл бұрын

    So clear and concise, which is so needed when learning Hegel ;]

  • @carloscamachopsychologist4800
    @carloscamachopsychologist48003 жыл бұрын

    Beautifully explained. Much appreciated doctor. 🙏

  • @frankchilds9848
    @frankchilds98483 жыл бұрын

    Thank you...This is great consolation in this world now.

  • @Historelic
    @Historelic3 жыл бұрын

    A very nice and appreciated effort, Thank you! I would only suggest creating a separate playlist for lectures on philosophy

  • @jeffrnyquist
    @jeffrnyquist3 жыл бұрын

    You help me see things I’ve missed. Thank you.

  • @nikhilchandan7321
    @nikhilchandan73212 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic lecture on Hegel.💐

  • @user-um4di5qm8p
    @user-um4di5qm8p2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for such clear explanation!

  • @guts1589
    @guts15893 жыл бұрын

    sir, that was a great lecture. thank you.

  • @abhimanyugandhi3430
    @abhimanyugandhi34303 жыл бұрын

    Excellent. Fucking excellent. My colleague uses help of ur lectures to prepare notes for her students. Beautifully given lectures. Will look forward to other lectures. All love

  • @sah6373
    @sah63733 жыл бұрын

    Taimur Sb, since stumbling upon your presentations, I have enjoyed each and every addition. You’re doing a great service to all, but specifically to those of us with additional time in this pandemic. KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK! If I may take the liberty of offering this, perhaps your English iterations would reach a wider audience, but your URDU versions are GOLD! Hope you’ll continue with Urdu as well. Jazakomullah!

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    sayed hasan Urdu is first priority to me. English is extra work.

  • @sah6373

    @sah6373

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Taimur_Laal Wish you continued success!

  • @daPawlak
    @daPawlak3 жыл бұрын

    looking forward to second part

  • @khenrajrajput1382
    @khenrajrajput13823 жыл бұрын

    Lot`s love from Tharparker Sir💕

  • @princevarughese6419
    @princevarughese64193 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant Prof. Taimur!

  • @kaigokugohan
    @kaigokugohan3 жыл бұрын

    Wow! Its a great lecture. Thank u for that!

  • @MuhammadAli-gd7rc
    @MuhammadAli-gd7rc3 жыл бұрын

    Please keep your mind on main topic don't move to other people while sidelining main topic.othewise good effort . looking forward more good from your channel.thanks

  • @pascalpoussin1209
    @pascalpoussin12093 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant, thank you for sharing.

  • @hereticmorte666
    @hereticmorte6663 жыл бұрын

    Thank you making these good sir. Love from India.

  • @rhitayan
    @rhitayan3 жыл бұрын

    Love from India ! Thank you sir!

  • @shirazhasan9954
    @shirazhasan99543 жыл бұрын

    assalm alikum sir aapka new student great job sir

  • @omerlateef9693
    @omerlateef96933 жыл бұрын

    May you be blessed.

  • @Nj01993
    @Nj019933 жыл бұрын

    Hi, I am from India. Your classes are very good. Hope to see you soon in india

  • @gregorykavivya1105
    @gregorykavivya11052 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for this.

  • @kaalapaisapiyar
    @kaalapaisapiyar3 жыл бұрын

    Bravo........ I think you should also define branches of philosophy with the rising questions with each branch.

  • @alishaikh6337
    @alishaikh63373 жыл бұрын

    Great. Please keep it up

  • @RashidAli-zn7um
    @RashidAli-zn7um3 жыл бұрын

    Plz make videos on other philosophers like Roussou, John locke and Monstesque also.

  • @HamzaAli-ee1oh

    @HamzaAli-ee1oh

    3 жыл бұрын

    Sir have done on it you can check playlist.

  • @shafqatrasool1166
    @shafqatrasool11663 жыл бұрын

    Thank you, Dr. Taimur for this lecture. I was a student of yours a long time ago. Q) Are the categories of mind really time-dependent? I know Kant would suggest so, but I feel that just because they have been conceived in the mind, it is somehow automatically assumed that such - or some of these - concepts CANNOT be absolute. Also, Perhaps Hegel's claim could stand well against Aristotle's 'Identity' given that the Aristotle grounds essence into the object itself, but would it really nullify Plato's static essences that themselves belong to a 'metaphysical' realm (supposedly time-independent)? A part I’m uncertain about is also where you mentioned that mathematics falls under a prior analytic. Kant’s development of the a priori synthetic certainly relies on the theoretical geometry and its mathematical axioms.

  • @noumanihsan2611

    @noumanihsan2611

    3 жыл бұрын

    I think that the Hegel's idea would nullify the Plato's idea of static essence because when you will consider a metaphysical realm presumably time independent then the very essence that would left will be 'One',from which all the essences would emanate and they definitely will depend upon time.

  • @mukarmaqureshi6251
    @mukarmaqureshi62513 жыл бұрын

    Sir, kindly make a video on ontology

  • @BilalKhan-er3jz
    @BilalKhan-er3jz2 жыл бұрын

    Wonderful!

  • @hmanoff
    @hmanoff3 жыл бұрын

    Thnku so much bruh

  • @SamiUllah-gq1ij
    @SamiUllah-gq1ij3 жыл бұрын

    Please sir upload lecture on arts by friedrich hegel

  • @ipreet6850
    @ipreet68503 жыл бұрын

    Sir please german philosophers ki series continue rakhna

  • @thephilosophyschool9528
    @thephilosophyschool95283 жыл бұрын

    yes again we will do philosophy 😍

  • @ryangarritty9761
    @ryangarritty97613 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating !

  • @World46282
    @World462823 жыл бұрын

    Respected sir ❤️🥰

  • @kaleemzaryal5077
    @kaleemzaryal5077 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you sir

  • @muhammadharis5170
    @muhammadharis51703 жыл бұрын

    Saw your video the first time coz someone sent me for CSS prep... I'm really happy to see a Pakistani channel of this quality...and then I'm sad once again to see a Pakistani channel having much less subscribers than it deserve..why is it? Why our channels are having less subscripers than very average indian channels...

  • @sujithajaleel803
    @sujithajaleel8033 жыл бұрын

    Thanqu very inspiring

  • @economicsonline7906
    @economicsonline79063 жыл бұрын

    sir kindly make a video on french revolution in urdu/hindi

  • @ovaiskanth1581
    @ovaiskanth15813 жыл бұрын

    Excellent

  • @ipreet6850
    @ipreet68503 жыл бұрын

    Next lecture on Kant please

  • @hadihassan372
    @hadihassan3723 жыл бұрын

    Better than school of life on philosophers

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you. Huge compliment. That is such a popular channel.

  • @kashanabdullah2291
    @kashanabdullah22913 жыл бұрын

    The precursor to karl marx

  • @kashanabdullah2291

    @kashanabdullah2291

    3 жыл бұрын

    Love it

  • @TarekFahmy
    @TarekFahmy3 жыл бұрын

    Amazing job......any sessions about Kant?

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Tarek Fahmy thank you. Yes. On this channel.

  • @chase36chase
    @chase36chase3 жыл бұрын

    more english lecures pls

  • @phlegmatic...4057

    @phlegmatic...4057

    3 жыл бұрын

    Lectures in English or just English lectures??? 😅🤟

  • @ArunPotdarLeo
    @ArunPotdarLeo3 жыл бұрын

    The roots of many aspects of Hegel's writings about logic and Dialectics are found in the Hindu, Buddhist and Jaina philosophies. Dr.D.T.Suziki, (Zen and Mahayana Buddhism), Dr. R.D. Ranade (Vedanta -The Culmination of Indian Thought.), has covered the subjects.

  • @TeaParty1776

    @TeaParty1776

    3 жыл бұрын

    Mysticism is a rationalization for evasion.

  • @shahzaibkaimkhani5422
    @shahzaibkaimkhani54223 жыл бұрын

    Time gives the legitimacy of our existance!

  • @zohraykhan5192
    @zohraykhan51922 жыл бұрын

    what is process of being from nothing , how is this possible ?

  • @nnahsan
    @nnahsan3 жыл бұрын

    The only constant is change

  • @thenowchurch6419
    @thenowchurch64193 жыл бұрын

    What are Empiricists using to analyze the knowledge their senses take in and where did they get the knowledge that human knowledge is only a posteriori ? That seems to be an innate flaw in their position.

  • @osafish
    @osafish3 жыл бұрын

    Please recommend a philosophy book. Regards

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    The Philosophy Book by DK Publishing.

  • @osafish

    @osafish

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Taimur_Laal thank you so much.

  • @josephsmyth832
    @josephsmyth8323 жыл бұрын

    So to sum it up in regards to the Hegelian Dialectic is that it lacks a sound mind since abstract is also related to math involving algebra instead of numbers in space and time ( arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy) Law and order requires a sound mind

  • @thenowchurch6419

    @thenowchurch6419

    3 жыл бұрын

    Hegel teaches that the Absolute Mind ( God, Reason) is directing the Dialectic. How is that not a sound mind

  • @josephsmyth832

    @josephsmyth832

    3 жыл бұрын

    thenowchurch That’s fraud because the God and reason are not found in the Hegelian Dialectic but in the 7 liberal arts and sciences known as the Trivium and Quadrivium which is mind and matter. Hegel uses chaos to get order which aren’t based on the laws of logic. The Quadrivium is numbers in space and time not abstract math like probabilities which is nothingness. Hegel uses positive law which is subjective logic and a logical fallacy instead of objective logic involving Natural law

  • @thenowchurch6419

    @thenowchurch6419

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@josephsmyth832 You have obviously not read any of Hegel's works or even a decent commentary of them. Hegel's whole system is based on Divine Spirit. You seem to have assumed that what uneducated yokels on the internet are calling the Hegelian Dialectic is what Hegel taught. Please do some real research before making declarative statements. Here is a quote from Hegel in his Introduction to the Philosophy of History (translated by Leo Rauch). "For some time it was customary to admire God's wisdom at work in animals, in plants and in the destinies of individuals. If we grant that providence reveals itself in such objects and materials then why not also in world history ? Here the material seems too great, yet the divine wisdom ie. Reason, is one and the same on the large scale and on the small, and we must not consider God to be too weak to apply His wisdom on a large scale. .............To that extent our approach is a Theodicy, a justification of the ways of God." Taken form page 18.

  • @josephsmyth832

    @josephsmyth832

    3 жыл бұрын

    thenowchurch Pay attention to the language you use because you said divine spirit which is the essence. Learn about the Trivium and Quadrivium before making nonsense argument regarding the spirit which relates to abstract which is a construct of the mind and nothing external. Before you mention God remember that G is the 7th letter of the alphabet and practiced by secret societies like the freemasons and Jesuits. I have plenty of reading material from Hegel to understand subjective and objective logic related to truth. Maybe do proper math instead of information theory related to probabilities

  • @josephsmyth832

    @josephsmyth832

    3 жыл бұрын

    thenowchurch Pay attention also to the word individual. Language is matter and form. IN subtracts words like tolerance, sanity as well as being divided and dual. An individual is someone who uses the laws of logic in relation to Aristotle and not Plato. NOT divided and dual

  • @darthrevan3342
    @darthrevan33423 жыл бұрын

    Kant knew the thing initsef, Clouscard said, he saw it and drew the curtain on it. Because teh sight was unbearable for the puritan.

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Lol. That is brilliant.

  • @darthrevan3342

    @darthrevan3342

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Taimur_Laal If you want to read the way of the praxis some day do. I recomand it.

  • @hmcyrus
    @hmcyrus3 жыл бұрын

    14:00

  • @andreiandrei9059
    @andreiandrei90593 жыл бұрын

    Hi, I would like to send you a book, about 2000 pages, a .pdf file, something more or less about the Dialectical Idealism, the Theory of Everything updated to about 2010, I don't think you had the chance to look at it. Can I do that? Can you please kindly give me the address of a temporary email account or something like that? دل سے شکریہ

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Andrei Andrei just send me download link here.

  • @SI-OPYADAV123
    @SI-OPYADAV1233 ай бұрын

    ❤❤

  • @wasilshah9665
    @wasilshah96653 жыл бұрын

    sir plz uload it urdu..

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    That will come in 2 more days. On editing table.

  • @ahmadbashir6483
    @ahmadbashir64833 жыл бұрын

    Fañtastic

  • @osafish
    @osafish3 жыл бұрын

    Daira ala, Taimur lala.

  • @quanta7992
    @quanta79923 жыл бұрын

    This is ur first lecture I didn't understand. 😭

  • @phlegmatic...4057

    @phlegmatic...4057

    3 жыл бұрын

    You can translate it. No issue. Its an understandable version.

  • @AlexanderPetersonml
    @AlexanderPetersonml3 жыл бұрын

    Never understood this. If it's fruitful but poorly organized, surely we'd all be better off if someone just rewrote it

  • @StefanTravis
    @StefanTravis3 жыл бұрын

    One day, there will be an "introduction to Hegel" from someone who's read any Hegel. But not today.

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Stefan Travis sorry you feel that way but it’s simply not correct to say that I’ve not read Hegel.

  • @StefanTravis

    @StefanTravis

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Taimur_Laal Then why are you ascribing the synthetic teleology of Fichte to Hegel, who explicitly rejected any teleology and described Fichte's work as a "dead schema". Put it another way, why are you repeating the exact mistake of Marx and the other Left Hegelians, in following the mischaracterisation by Chalybaus of Hegel?

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    ​@@StefanTravis Ah, I see where you are coming from. Yes, I have gone with the more traditional or established view on Hegel. It is also what jumped at me when I read Phenomenology. But I am also open to rethinking my views in this regard. Thanks for your feedback.

  • @shayanarshad4137
    @shayanarshad41373 жыл бұрын

    Sir ache ache lectures eng me parha lete ho Aur eng me hum kamjoor hai Tou iss waja se buhat masla hota hai Zyada tar samaj ma bhi nahi aaata

  • @s0vietonion

    @s0vietonion

    3 жыл бұрын

    Aa gaya Urdu me bhi!

  • @greggvillanueva1291
    @greggvillanueva12912 жыл бұрын

    Hegel was planning to be a pastor, not a priest. He's a protestant.

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    2 жыл бұрын

    Quite right.

  • @humanitylovers6260
    @humanitylovers62603 жыл бұрын

    Premium Nahi le sagta sir ji garib ho pr apka shagird ho

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Premium nahin hai. Premier hai. Matlab opening. Watch it live as it uploads.

  • @humanitylovers6260

    @humanitylovers6260

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Taimur_Laal o ab samja ustad g

  • @humanitylovers6260

    @humanitylovers6260

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Taimur_Laal English aati nahi mujy is liye pr falsafa bhot pasad hai mijy

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Urdu main bhi yeh lecture aa raha hai.

  • @paulcockshott8733
    @paulcockshott87333 жыл бұрын

    Taimur, you are certainly a very good and clear lecturer but I dont think that the lecture has made me any more sympathetic to the idea of contemporary students studying Hegel. Far from being a help it would , I think be a hinderence to their intellectual development. The problem is that the whole edifice is the most awful mysticism and speculation. The very concepts that are being applied like being, nothingness and essence have no part in the scientific materialist understanding of reality. These ideas are not relied upon by any of the contemporary sciences. No biologist thinks that there are essences, instead we know that species are characterised by common genetic codes, that the relationship between species is familial or inherited not one of logical characterisations. In other words the relationships come down to actual configurations of atoms in DNA and the comparative shared sequences in related species. The idea that logic is something that nature has, is also quite misleading. Logic can only occur where matter is so configured as to perform logical operations, conjunctions, disjunctions negations etc. This is something that can be done by neural networks, by various electical and mechanical devices, and at a lower level by various enzymatic feedback relationships within cells. But that is because it is advantageous to the evolutionary survival of organisms to be able to react to their environment. To do this they must process information. This processing of information by neurons can, in certain cases, be approximated by a description in terms of boolean logical operations. So to a limited extent neural systems can implement logics, but describing them in terms of logic is actually very crude, a very poor approximation to what they do. A more sophisticated understanding would be in terms of matrix multiplication rather than simple logic. I can not think of any instances in which a useful understanding of any real process can be well modeled by the sort of abstractions that Hegel employs. We have so more tools to look at the world with developed in the last 200 years that to go back to 1820s would be a terrible retrograde step. The great danger is that young people's minds will get stuck in a time warp, employing modes of thought that have long since been abandoned whilst in the process they ignore the concepts and threads of intellectual development that have led up to a modern scientific understanding. The only useful point from Hegel in what you covered is the determino est negato point. But this is nothing specific to Hegel. Students at school level are introduced to this early on in the curriculum maths when they cover set theory and Venn diagrams. It is so much the common understanding of anyone who has been to high school that they hardly have to read Hegel. If people are to understand a modern materialist outlook, and if they are to start that with philosophy then the starting point has to be Lucretius. Then move onto either Maxwell or Boltzman and get a grip on the concept of entropy. From that move onto the application of Boltzmanns concepts via Shannon in information theory, then Crick and Watson and the information revolution in our understanding of life. They should obviously read Darwin as well. If you want to concentrate on logic the thinkers I would recomend would be Boole, Russell, Turing and perhaps David Deutsch.

  • @davidbowen6253

    @davidbowen6253

    3 жыл бұрын

    Most kind Taimur. Thank you for putting over difficult subject so lucidly

  • @TeaParty1776
    @TeaParty17763 жыл бұрын

    Hegel+Not Hegel=constipation

  • @osafish
    @osafish3 жыл бұрын

    Daira ala, Taimur lala.

  • @Taimur_Laal

    @Taimur_Laal

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you.

Келесі