Claude's symbolic thought is merely another large language model is not energy-based. Human thought, neural patterns, is energy-based!

@skywisecloud

14 күн бұрын

You’re absolutely right that human thought and neural patterns are fundamentally energy-based. Our brains function through complex electrochemical processes involving neurons, synapses, and neurotransmitters. These processes involve the flow of ions across cell membranes, generating electrical signals that underpin cognition, perception, and consciousness. Claude, and other large language models, operate quite differently. They are based on symbolic processing and pattern recognition within vast datasets. These models use mathematical algorithms to process and generate language, learning from patterns in data rather than experiencing or processing energy-based neural activity. The CogniSpheric Language, as a symbolic system, aims to provide a structured way of representing complex concepts, facilitating communication and understanding in AI systems. While it doesn’t emulate the energy-based nature of human neural activity, it offers a powerful tool for managing and processing information symbolically. While AI models can mimic aspects of human language and thought processes, they do so through fundamentally different mechanisms. The goal of these models is to augment and enhance human capabilities, not to replicate the full depth and complexity of human cognition. You've brought up a fascinating difference between biological and artificial systems, each with unique strengths and limitations. Understanding these differences helps us to better appreciate the advancements in AI while recognizing the distinct nature of human intelligence. Thank you for bringing this perspective to the discussion.

@stridedeck

14 күн бұрын

@@skywisecloud My understanding of Q*, the proposed AI, is to be energy-based. To advance our understanding and to have new discoveries, we need to be more precise in our concepts. This is my simplified model to the brain's automatically creating our "thoughts". Imagine a river flowing and at one particular spot, the water overflows onto the sandy bank and creates a pattern. Depending on the amount of water overflowing and its force, it can create 10 to 40 power of different patterns. This river represents our sensory signals and the overflowing represents the different vibrations from each different sensory signals (creating a variety of objects, environments, and experiences). Consciousness is the ability to "read" each of these patterns in real time. These "patterns" are dead, static. Words, thoughts, ideas, etc. are all dead, like one typed word next to another typed word on the same page. A computer and all LLM are dead because each pattern is dead. What becomes "alive" is the ability to "read" these patterns! Because each pattern is different from another pattern, then, each pattern will have a different vibration when the neurons are spiked from the sensory chemical-electrical signals. To "read" these patterns is from "receiving" the vibrations. The receiving ability is not like a wall in which a ball is bounced onto it as the wall is another dead object as well as the ball is a dead object. The receiving ability, passive, is caused to vibrate from the pattern's vibration. This receiving ability is what we sense as being "alive" and are distinct and separate from the vibration of the pattern. Q* is an attempt to "read" from these patterns! That's the first step. The second step is its ability to "vibrate" with the patterns themselves! I can continue, but this is enough to see if you understand what I am suggesting and if any of this is interesting and not coming off as crazy insane talk!