"It goes in the eye sockets, the armpit and the groin" *happy ukelele song*

@mrfahrenheit3867

4 жыл бұрын

I'm tap my foot to that tune

@sharonr2121

3 жыл бұрын

Mr Fahrenheit, hallo! Although this is unrelated to the topic of your comment, God loves you, and He died for you as Jesus Christ! Please turn entirely to Him while you still can, because time is running out, but don’t be afraid! Have a good day!

@billygunn7180

3 жыл бұрын

I hate when that happens.

@DaCoolCrushIceKillah

3 жыл бұрын

Happy medieval jazz starts again ;) .

@rigohook1160

2 жыл бұрын

🤣😂

This guy is just so positive and passionate about all things medieval it's contagious

@LeatherCladVegan

2 жыл бұрын

Just like COVID-19.

@crashpeperami7130

Жыл бұрын

He’s kinda inspired me to take medieval history in uni.

Also the fact swords could be worn easily and comfortably in daily life would give them lots of utility. Akin to wearing a pistol vs carrying a heavy cumbersome rifle around. Awesome channel, unbelievable production value my goodness! It's a crime there are so few subs!

@vanivanov9571

5 жыл бұрын

Excellent backup weapon, and excellent self-defence weapon. Just like a pistol.

@isaiahmatthewaraneta7498

5 жыл бұрын

I second that. I carry one on the daily and I can even extend it up to 8 inches during “tight” situations 😉

@leighjordine4031

5 жыл бұрын

@@isaiahmatthewaraneta7498 that sounds like a short sword

@isaiahmatthewaraneta7498

5 жыл бұрын

Leigh Jordine Short but effective.

@Zonalyre

5 жыл бұрын

@@leighjordine4031 Greatest comment ever

No idea how this doesnt have more subs or views. Top notch production quality, top bloke, interesting subjects.

@rantingtheverse008

5 жыл бұрын

I think it's because people don't like history at all sad....

@scarletpimpernelagain9124

4 жыл бұрын

Placeholder Name People seem to prefer fantasy instead of the real and often more interesting history the fantasy is based on.

@PoeCompany

4 жыл бұрын

i found it years ago, left it for some time, and now i am back. Also finally subscribed!

@cootsyuk7889

4 жыл бұрын

Probably because it tells us almost nothing about different types of swords or how they were used!

@placeholdername3206

4 жыл бұрын

@@cootsyuk7889 Yeah, except when I made that comment a year ago, the channel has gained over 500k subs

I like how you admit there is possibility of being wrong :) thats very humble a knightly quality indeed

@eylab1541

4 жыл бұрын

Welcome to science.

Me: Aagh, I'm tired, I should probably leave the Internet for now... KZread: How Are Different Types of Sword Used? Me: YEs

I feel a crucial part of the symbology surrounding a sword is that swords are used exclusively to kill people. Spears and bows can be used during hunting and axes and hammers are just modified versions of tools we've been using since the stone age. But when you saw a dude that invested the substantial ammount a sword costs, purely to kill humans, you know they are someone to look out for.

Say hi if you just found this channel and loving it

@putnamehereholdmadoodle

5 жыл бұрын

Hi

@putnamehereholdmadoodle

5 жыл бұрын

I finger my bum then my wife walked in so I changed the movie to KZread and it was this guy now I'm subbed and so glad I was almost caught with my finger up my bum

@barryirlandi4217

5 жыл бұрын

I'm amazed I didn't find it earlier

@bushy8421

5 жыл бұрын

Hi

@flee4342

5 жыл бұрын

Hi

I think the thing that distinguishes a sword from other weapons and perhaps gives it much of it's status is that, unlike pole arms, bows, axes etc, you can wear it rather than carry it. A knight could wear his sword away from the battlefield, out of armour, and it would display his status.

+ knights kept their swords because many of their enemies were not in full plate armour. swords were also weapons of personal protection in non-battle situation where the enemy, even if he could afford full plate armour, was not telegraphing his evil ambush plans by wearing it.

@DzinkyDzink

5 жыл бұрын

"Why are people staring at me? Don't Burgundians wear full plate when they go around their town buisiness?" - fantasy rpg character.

@user-vz7mu4su9n

5 жыл бұрын

Perhaps also useful to keep handy for disciplinary action if it should be needed.

@maybecannoteatbyahu

4 жыл бұрын

@@DzinkyDzink so now mount and blade 2 don't allow you to do like that in city's quest. no def no shield just decorated sword

to anybody who says anything about historical records of katanas cutting though samurai armour to justify swords in combat remember that for a very long time samurai wore lacquered wood scale armour.

@TheAlhouk57

4 жыл бұрын

People also need to remember that the Japanese folded katana thousands of times because their steel was horrible

@JackSilver1410

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheAlhouk57 Tell me you're fucking joking...

@jlogan2228

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheAlhouk57 no, they folded it 8-20 times max bc by the time you get past 20 fold's the carbon becomes way to difused and it serves no purpose bc by then you have a homogenous billet. They were aware of this. They may have done 1000 layers by folding 10 layers of the steel ten times but the whole "folding thousands of times" I a myth. Additionally just in time investment folding it that many times would mean one single sword would take at least a year to make just on the billet of steel not including the months of refining work polishing fittings and other things.

@wakanakapisihello5655

4 жыл бұрын

@@jlogan2228 you are correct in the compounding exponentially during folding, but there are documents staying swordsmith's worked much longer than a year on certain projects...

@astralpigeon1844

4 жыл бұрын

Samurai used iron armor, they didn't use wood for armor that's a myth. Katana couldn't cut through it either way, samurai hardly ever used katana in real battles, they would use their bows or naginata, tetsubo, or spear

Swords were like modern day handguns, and spears/polearms were like assault rifles. Your primary weapon of war is the assault rifle, but you'll still carry a good handgun just in case.

@LucidLivingYT

5 жыл бұрын

Supertomiman And just like most peasants (enlisted personnel) will only have a spear/rifle, only knights/important personnel will have sidearms.

@charliericker274

5 жыл бұрын

It's super effective against peasants though.

@eddierudolph7694

5 жыл бұрын

@@LucidLivingYT and in modern warfare not everyone is issued a sidearm today.

@bartvanriel6767

5 жыл бұрын

You sir, stole my comment.

@italiantraditionalcatholic2390

5 жыл бұрын

Ar-15..is NOT an assault rifle!

Jason: swords were not as effective in later periods Mad Jack Churchill: wanna bet?

@visionist7

4 жыл бұрын

Tell that to the WW2 Japanese

@wakanakapisihello5655

4 жыл бұрын

Mad Jack was a hoot, was he not? You know his men had to love him, how could you not be inspired to fight with that guy for a leader?

@CrniWuk

4 жыл бұрын

@@wakanakapisihello5655 That guy also killed Germans with his back pipe.

@jerryhu3470

4 жыл бұрын

​@@visionist7 But people stopped wearing armor after Napoleon. Swords became effective again, if you can survive their bullets.

@viktorsilva4017

4 жыл бұрын

"hold my rifle"

One reason for the sword's continued use is that for the same weight, you can get a significantly longer sword than ax or mace, so for a sidearm, you want to have as much reach as possible while still being light enough to wield with one hand (so that you can hold a shield or grapple with the other hand).

Half-Sword, Jason! Half-Sword! Use it like a Short Spear! Stick em' in the squishy bits!

@ShazzikinZ

6 жыл бұрын

Like this: www.swordsmanship.ca/academy-articles/armour-hand-fighting/

@jasonkingsley2762

6 жыл бұрын

Half swording is good, assuming you take pietro montes advice and have maille on your left palm! If possible I’d prefer a pollaxe.

@vanivanov9571

5 жыл бұрын

@@jasonkingsley2762 EVERYONE prefers a pollaxe! Pollaxe for president! And yeah, I'd prefer a mailed glove. A razor-sharp blade should not be gripped.

@TheRdamterror

5 жыл бұрын

or use the back part as a hamer or hook to pull or screw of the pummel and trow it :)

@aaronaxel4760

5 жыл бұрын

@@jasonkingsley2762, watch Skallagrim's video on halfswording. He makes a very compelling case that you don't need gloves at all if you hold it properly.

This guy talks with so much calm and love for the subject. Please just give him a tv show!

I love your videos, I have always loved history and your videos show that medieval battles were more brutal than a movie could ever be made

@IntrusiveThot420

4 жыл бұрын

Stuart Long you know, if you ever want to see very realistic dueling, check out "The Duelists" by Ridley Scott (of Alien fame!). It's a quite good movie and the sword duels are EXTREMELY realistic.

The sword was extremely effective during early to mid medieval times but as soon as heavy plate became a common sight on the battlefield it became vastly less effective. Although in the hands of a master it was still deadly no matter how heavily armoured someone was.

@careyfreeman5056

14 күн бұрын

Wouldn't Edward III have used a sword? When does plate over mail come in? 14th Century?

Amazing series. I am quite taken by your mention of the battle of Grunwald. It's a nice gesture. The victory in this battle is celebrated by massive reenactments taking place every year. The story is that on that day the Polish king hesitated to accept the battle so to allow the sun to tire the heavily armed Teutonian host. The Teutons had dug out pits and tried to provoke the king into a fight by sending these two swords with a slight that he can use the weapons to arm himself, to which they heard a response that 'we have enough of swords, but we will also accept these two'. Basically, the king kept his cool and let the battle play out the way he wanted it. Ironically, the Teutonic Knights suffered high losses because they allowed themselves to be taunted into following a retreating light Lithuanian cavalry and horse archers, which was a planned maneuver. The annual celebrations are full of historical flavour, with medieval village and ceremonies performed in Latin. Here you can find more about them: www.grunwald1410.pl/index.php?cat=2

@Wateringman

4 жыл бұрын

The Grunwald website you gave is in bloody Polish....😠

I am sure that you have heard this before... But I am so impressed with your understanding of the real basics, regarding everything that you talk about... Rush lights... etc... Most have heard of them, but that was so interesting... Please keep them coming. Thank you

I love swords, and as much as the unrealistic side of me loves Cloud style buster swords, as far as realistic swords go, the hand and a half/bastard sword is probably my favorite weapon. I just really like the concept of the utility it possesses by being designed to be capable of being wielded with one OR two hands.

@ultrixcrucesignatus1261

5 жыл бұрын

A full length longsword grip feels more nimble to me. It gives you a huge advantage in two hands, and makes it much easier to pull off certain maneuvers. I don't practice with shields or bucklers though, so I've almost always got both hands on my weapon. It is possible to use a full size longsword in one hand, but usually you'd only drop the off hand for grappling, or when adjusting for a half-sword grip. I think if you really value one handed use, an arming sword would still be the way to go. It seems to me the hand and a half swords were popular less for their handling aspects, and more because the shorter grip was more manageable on horseback. As well as being less cumbersome for day to day carry.

@broshmosh

5 жыл бұрын

The optional grip style comes entirely from the length of the handle, not the blade. As explained in the video, bastard sword has lots of limitations and the era it came from means it was never really used for slashing, effectively making it a heavy-duty rapier. You could put a long handle on many decent length blades.

@Modighen

5 жыл бұрын

I made a waster with a "blade" about 6" longer, and I found with just that little extra it was awkward to wear and draw. They were certainly popular, though, and I believe that bastard swords were for those who liked using a two hander for the leverage, but also wanted portability and were willing to sacrifice the advantages of the extra reach. Especially off the battlefield when people weren't so likely to be armored.

@yammorin7011

4 жыл бұрын

Mine is probably the sabre because its light and easy to wield around

@obituaryollie9104

4 жыл бұрын

@@yammorin7011 I'm more of a Khopesh man myself, but for similar reasons.

About the two swords that the knights of teutonic order gave to polish king Władysław Jagiełło- I think they have messed that story up a bit. First of all, they were given as a symbol that teutonic knights as christians are allowed by Jesus to defend themself (based on story that Jesus allowed the apostles to buy 1 sword). The part of the insult might be added by a polish writer, written by Sienkiewicz, who wrote quite a few nice historical novels, but they were not that acurate. Teutonic knights were not taken by suprise, and this swords were kept and used on coronation ceremonies but as a symbol of polish and lithuanian commonwelth, not as a crowning sword (which was Szczerbiec, the sword that was owned by Bolesław Chrobry, 1st king of Poland).

@Drewkas0

4 жыл бұрын

Why would the Teutonic Knights need to send a symbol that they were allowed to defend themselves? It was well understood that the Teutonic Order was a militaristic force, and at that point prior to the battle of Grunwald, it was clear they were going to put up a fight. But I think you’re right that the Teutonic Knights were not taken by surprise. According to the Wikipedia article, the knights sent the swords to goad the enemy into attacking because the knights felt it advantageous to hold a defensive position. I admit Wikipedia isn’t by any means the best source, but the insult idea seems to make sense.

@drachenfes

4 жыл бұрын

@@Drewkas0 The custom of passing the sword to the enemy before the fight was way before battle of Grunwald, but this case was clearly related to Jesus passing to swords to his apostles, which meant "you can defend yourself, but you're not alloved to attack" (something like that, english is not my native language). Teutonic knights could not attack other christians (in theory), so they could not attack polish kingdom (in theory). The day of battle of Grunwald was "the day 61- Jesus sends out his 12 apostles" in christians church. They related probably to this part of Bible, and thats why there were exactly 2 swords.

@Drewkas0

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting. Thanks for the insight!

@drachenfes

4 жыл бұрын

@@Drewkas0 well, In first comment I put it a little bit bad- the herolds of course were offending polish king Władysław, but the swords itself were not for insult as I wrote above, this interpretation comes from polish chronicles (Jan Długosz) and than from polish novel "Krzyżacy" written by Sienkiewicz. But the story about this war and battle is very interesting actually, with huge "ponton" bridge build, guys like Jan Żiżka from Czech or polish hero Zawisza Czarny fighting...

Wow, your channel is amazing! The thought occurred that one additional reason for the sword being promenant dispite it's weakness against plate armor could be that it remained effective against lesser forms of armor that may have been prevelent or more prevelent at points in time among non knight fighting men. The social effect of a noble weapon to be feared by all but another knight would be worth cobsidering as well.

I typically watch your videos twice- once to get the information and then once to look at all the cool stuff going on at your lovely farm!!! It is fantastic!!!

This is an amazing channel! And as a Pole I was very glad to hear this anecdote, thank you Jason for all these videos and for your knowledge and love of history

These are soo good and informative. I was on tours and seen re-enactors give medieval weapon demonstrations to groups at Trim Castle, I wish they were half as interesting as these videos.

Thank you for making these, I can't stop watching them.

Stick them with the pointy end, basically. Loving these videos.

The battle of Grunwald was a little more complex, but all in all great video. Loved it.

Just discovered this channel. It's my new favorite. I'm fascinated by the medieval period.

@ModernKnight

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

I love this channel first of all. As many have said the sword was often used, I think, as a weapon off the battlefield as a means of self-defense when opponents were in nothing but clothing in situations such as a duel or street fight.

You are going too boom my friend, keep up this brilliant content!

Finally a channel what shares knowledge and culture. Quality videos. Big LIKE !

This is the sort of stuff I had been looking for on KZread for ages!!! Subbed!!!

Man I LOVE that channel. I wish you had like 1 million subs!!!

I confirm that the history of the two swords from Grunwald is still well known in Poland, and the symbol is used on medals, banners and in the coat of arms of the commune of Grunwald.

I can't stop watching. Pollaxes are my new favourite

In Finland a sword is a part of formal attire in a PhD graduation ceremony today. There are two blade lengths available: shorter (71 cm) for people under 175 cm or longer (81 cm) for people over 175 cm. The blades are gilded with 24 carat gold. Needless to say, they are always a talking point when graduation ceremonies are brought up. The sword is a symbol of a scientist’s fight for truth and goodness, born of rigorous research.

man ive never been into this stuff before but because of this channel I cant get enough just binging it!

Amazing series, man! Thnaks for sharing your expirence and knowledge with us! 🤘

This series is amazing and has really contributed to my appreciation of european history. Thank you!

In all seriousness I Love this guy, would love to meet and learn from him, the episode about what peasants ate mad me super hungry ! Lol

Fascinating as always.

Thank you Sir, love your videos!

"It goes in the groin." I felt that...

Love history! Happy to have found this!

Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us. 👍

Another well educated and established video!

love love love this channel!

This is a great channel, subbed.

@ModernKnight

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks

What is important to note here is that although swords might have become less and less useful on the battlefield as armour tech was developed, it still served as a perfect sidearm for civilian situations, just like nowadays in countries that still allow people to carry guns - noone normal is conducting their daily bussniess, walking around town with an assault rifle. You generally always would go for a pistol, cause it's more convenint to carry. So the idea of a sidearm to protect yourself from some brigands or such would mean that a sword is still in use by people, even though you might not want your life to depend on it in battle.

@TheCrimsonAtom

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly, also swords lost their use the late Medieval and Renaissance but were very prominent in the ages later, as volleys of rifles shot but eventually when they ran out of ammo or closed in they went with swords, also hussars which are fast riders carrying swords were extremely popular and very good against soldiers in fancy coats.

@mortache

5 жыл бұрын

@@TheCrimsonAtom since armor was becoming useless compared to its price and weight because of guns, slashing swords like the saber rose back to prominence

@wakanakapisihello5655

4 жыл бұрын

@@mortache the rapier in particular seems to be extremely popular

@mortache

4 жыл бұрын

@@wakanakapisihello5655 rapier is excellent for one on one duels, though i think they're big and clunky to carry around which is probably why armies switched to cutlasses and sabers and other short swords in later centuries

@Riceball01

4 жыл бұрын

@@mortache I'd argue that it was more the cost of equipping a standing army with armor became the main factor for the decline of armor more than guns. Think of it, during the Medieval and Renaissance period (and before) war was a come as you are affair. If you went to war as a professional soldier you were expected to have your own weapons and armor already, if you were a peasant conscript your lord might provide you with some sort of polearm or arrows if you're an archer but anything else you were expected to provide for yourself out of your own pocket. But once standing armies started to come about you now had to arm, pay, feed, clothe, and house your soldiers 24/7 for as long as they serve, that's a good bit of money, add armor to the mix then it starts to become prohibitively expensive since armor isn't cheap.

Supposedly, according to a chronicler, the thing about those two swords was that polish King was holding his troops at ready but not attacking, keeping Teutonic nights in the open field of Grunwald in blazing summer sun, while keeping light Lithuaninan and Tatar cavalry ready in nearby woods. The insult was, that the swords were presented to him unsheathed, ready for battle to encourage him to start the attack, as he seemed to be insecure, but he was just waiting for them to get impatient and sluggish in that July heat.

Very informative, I appreciate the narration of real life history rather than Hollywood interpretation

@vanivanov9571

5 жыл бұрын

His points on swords were a bit worse than Hollywood, actually. Guns made swords MORE useful on battlefields, as armour started to fade out. They were used up to world war 1.

How does this channel have so little subs? The production quality and content are really great.

From what I learned from this channel, could you maybe draw a wild comparison to a whip? I mean, since the sword was not that useful in battle, because of different armours, its "target audience" could have been the peasentry in a non battle situation. Not even to be used actively on them but to be seen. As you might want to put it, to remind everyone of the ruling power structure. Love this channel btw!

Love the video. Production quality is top notch. I think the title is a bit misleading.

That was great, thanks. The sword will never die, it's an eternal symbol.

Great vid... I love this series it's so informative, I'm hooked 😄 I have a mini replica of the Polish coronation sword, my uncles gave it to my dad the first time we went to Poland in 1966, it was dad's first visit home after the war..I'll be passing the sword down to my son 😄😎

Great video...seems like the sword functioned as status symbol, backup weapon in cqb, and every day carry. Sort of like a “handgun/pistol”

I would just love to work on this channel or have a pint with this man and discuss medieval warfare

That first weapon looks like the falchion from hell. Wow. No frills, all kills. I've certainly seen long sword techniques where the blade is grasped (with gauntlets of course) and choked up on to use for close quarters thrusting and also reversed techniques where the quillion ends were used as a bashing tool. Certainly not as effective as a mace or warhammer, but definitely inventive and better than nothing against a plate helmet. I have a hard time believing that military picks were actually good weapons. They look outrageously wicked, very intimidating and certainly effective, but what happened when you got your pick stuck in a plate helmet, a shield or lodged in bone? You have the advantage of leverage and kinetic energy to place a devastating blow, but don't have the same pulling force as a spear or thrusting weapon to extract the weapon. It's just a small muscle group you're using to pull it out, especially if used on horseback. If you're facing one foe at a time, you can stop and wiggle the pick out of hard material, but in a warfare scenario it seems detrimental.

@broshmosh

5 жыл бұрын

Are you a Skallagrim viewer, perhaps? :P

@vanivanov9571

5 жыл бұрын

Bec-de-corbin is better. Generally, I'd use the hammer side whenever possible, and only swap to the pick-side when against someone very well armoured. Something to consider is, if you kill two people and have a weapon failure, you're still winning. Also, just go to your sword, or get support from your squires and friends, until you get a chance to regain the weapon or retreat and rearm?

@zoesmith7612

5 жыл бұрын

You don't have to wear gloves, I've done it bare handed with sharp swords. Grip is the key.

@Modighen

5 жыл бұрын

I believe the hammer end is for those times you're worried about getting the piercing side stuck in someone's skull. It may not cause the same fatal injury, but you can still deliver some pretty nasty concussive force to a person's skull, as the padding and harness under a helmet can only be effective to a certain point. Especially when you have the momentum of a moving horse to add to it.

@mouija1450

5 жыл бұрын

@@Modighen Oh, I'm sure a hammer will do the job just fine. Prehistoric men had no problem killing each other with stones and wooden clubs.

Great Video. However i think we should keep in Mind that, as Armor was Pushed back by guns and the corresponding economical repurcations, the Sword actually became a main weapon ( one might say, for the first time) for Cavalrymen. I am referring to the kind of Cavalry you see in the Napoleonic wars up until world war 1. After all, it was allways a nimble and deadly weapon, just didn't go through armor.

I love this guy - his knowledge and passion are just a joy 💖

@ModernKnight

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

@lauragovernali4332

4 жыл бұрын

Always a pleasure!

Swords were used for self-defense and status. In truth, what defined "sword" back then was hilt construction and double-edgeness. The German Masser was a way to go over every law concerning swords, since it was essentially a big knife with a guard.

you are a true badass my friend. thanks for teaching me so many things!

@ModernKnight

3 жыл бұрын

Glad to help

Ok you got me interested so you got a new subscriber but the only problem is i cant stop watching now

@ModernKnight

4 жыл бұрын

Lol, nice to have you onboard!

To use only a sword in batle is like drivin a porsche 911 to a offroad track, but the bad thing on most rough weapons is that they are slow in use. The one and a half handed sword is a nice choice. It is very versatile. Its useable on one or two hand like you told but it is perfect for close quater combat sa well. With onehand on the blade and right on the hilt it is very effective and the crossguard and pommel a weapons as well......Like Thalhofer mentioned its ooooh not friendly....Your videos are realy nice and very profesional. It would be nice to have them more frequently....👍😁

I'd dig your take on tournament contest in "El Sid" speaking of swords.

Ahh my favorite part of Medieval history.

I've always thought the sword was likely a bit of a status item as well. Compared to other weapons, the sword requires more training to be effective. Any peasant can be effective with a spear or an axe, but to be effective with a sword takes time to train that peasants to not have.

France needs to reinstatement the capetian line from the carolingians Montjoie Saint Denis!

The swords of pride and violence, then used for coronations, wow, what a way of salting the wound.

The expanda de ropa type of rapiers grew out of that hand a half sword, becoming longer and narrower for thrusting. And then the fencing swords grew from that.

Still issued to military officers today, the sword is awarded during the commissioning ceremony and worn with dress uniform. Also like that first crude cleaving sword, it reminds me of those Elvish swords in Lord of The Rings

@defaultytuser

3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely! That first scene whith the Elves repeling Sauron's army immediately came to my mind aswell.

Hey I had a couple questions. 1: When you were talking about the issue of longswords/bastard sword in very close quarters, wouldn’t half-swording be an appropriate technique? 2: I was under the impression that the big benefits of swords in the later medieval era was their convenience for self defense given how easily you could carry one in a scabbard and draw it at a moment’s notice compared to other weapons more suited for a battlefield. Would that be correct and could that mean they went less out of style and more just transitioned to a different purpose?

Swords are the type of thing we see in movies and television... also in period artwork, fencing treatises, and weapons ownership laws. The sword as a status symbol holds true in the Early Medieval Period, but in the Late Middle Ages they were ubiquitous among middle-class soldiers. Burgundian statutes from the 15th century specified that archers should carry a two-handed sword, Scottish laws from the same period dictated that anyone who owned ten or more pounds in goods needed a sword, the muster roll of one French garrison town recorded that nearly every man in the militia owned a sword, the list goes on. While swords didn't account for as many casualties on historical battlefields as they do in modern pop culture, they seem to have remained very important weapons for every day soldiers, and were probably a much more common sight on the hip of the medieval infantryman than the pistol is for his modern counterpart.

That arming sword is beautiful

I read the reason you drive on the left side of the road because in olden days it was custom to pass someone on the trail on the right. So your sword hand is facing the possible danger.

I love this channel

Alot of duels were fought with the arming sword. That was another use for it and part of why it's the "quintessential knight sword". Also it was worn in everyday life, unarmored, virtually everywhere a Knight went so it was a highly visible status symbol

great channel 👍

You didn't want me fighting and now look at me.standing up to evil isn't the same as sowing its seeds,you did what was right

I've always heard that the Falchron was the back-up weapon of archers. When the range got down to knife fighting distance, they put the bow down and started slashing with their Falchron.

Excellent

@ModernKnight

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks

I think it's important to note that knights wouldn't always be fighting other knights in full plate or chain. There'd be lots of foot soldiers in padded jack types of armor especially in the earlier periods. The sword definitely dwindled in importance in the later periods though.

very nice arming sword!

...and Stannis had Lightbringer

@visionist7

4 жыл бұрын

Not in the show he didn't! I wanted to see that

@O.G.H.

4 жыл бұрын

@@visionist7 That would've increased the CGI costs through infinity. Every single time a light sword

@michaelmiranda6571

4 жыл бұрын

"Lightbringer"

@hailhydreigon2700

4 жыл бұрын

@@visionist7 He did have it in the show. It wasn't THE Lightbringer, but he named it Lightbringer.

@thac0twenty377

4 жыл бұрын

he wishes

I'm in love with a channel.

@visionist7

4 жыл бұрын

That's good! Which channel might that be?

@excogitatorishominum6819

4 жыл бұрын

@@visionist7 It's a magnificent channel, with it's contents made with excellence, care and love... It's called Modern History TV. ^^

It's also important to note that swords are disposable weapons. With every use in battle wears down it's durability, swords definitely have a self life. The reason why we have swords from the middle ages is because these swords are heirloom and rarely see the battle. Like the video, the sword is a status symbol and in most cultures master work swords are used as gifts.

@vanivanov9571

5 жыл бұрын

This is more true of spears and hafted weapons. Those break a lot, knights often went through many lances in a battle. Your sword could last you more than one battle.

Hello, great video! but I have to ask why was half swording not mentioned? It allows you to use longswords at close range and effectively attack plate armored opponents by giving them a meaty whack with the pommel. Granted I don’t know how terribly common half swording was but I felt like it deserved a bit of a mention.

Love this guy...Jason you really have a feel for this material...grammerci!!

I'm reminded of learning about how the Katana wasn't the preferred weapon on the battlefields in Japan, either. Whereas the realization is that if you're able to cut someone down two or three feet away from you, with one (Or a tachi), that you're already in a bit of a bind because your opponent is only two or three feet away from you.

Can you tell me the name of the musictitle of the backgroundmusic from the beginning on...??

In Mount & Blade the War Cleaver had to be one of my favorites right next to the Great Hammer

can someone point me to the sources for the sword showed in the beginning, the giant machete/falchion/hellblade thing. i know a thing or two about swords, but i have never seen anything like that!

Correct me if I am wrong, but as far as I know about the battle of Grunwald (1410), the Polish king ordered his army to be ready for the battle at around 4 a.m., so they could take comfortable positions, hidden in the shadow of the trees. The teutonic knights were standing on the battlefield, fully equiped with their armors, under the sun. It was 15th of July, so you can only imagine how hot it was in full armor. In the video you say the polish army attacked, but as far as I know, Ulrich von Jungingen was the one who gave the attack order, because his army was suffering from the heat. Just wanted to clarify that or like I said, correct me if I am wrong ;)

Don't forget about half-swording technique. They held the sword by its blade and used the handle and guard as a mace. It was a common technique of fighting with a sword against armoured oponent. Few hits to the helmet could cause a severe concussion and then be more easily stabbed into to opened parts of the armor.

Great video. Just wondering if any of your swords are star fire swords. I used to have those custom made.

@ModernKnight

3 жыл бұрын

All my swords are individualy made by S George Armouries here in England.

Thank you for that.

Well - time for me to put on my knighthood. Goodknight.