I've driven both models from Mombasa to Nairobi and I loved the Mazda (diesel) more for it's comfort, performance and handling. I happen to be quite tall, so comfort matters to me

@carswithmula

10 ай бұрын

In your take, is the diesel engine more smooth than the petrol?

@saix81

10 ай бұрын

@@carswithmula I haven't driven the KF variant, which you have reviewed, it was a KE. Personally, I drive a similar KE diesel with 160,000kms on the odometer and I still find it smooth. I can't tell which is smoother really, between diesel and petrol, but I really love it, especially for it's power and economy. The 2.5 variant also has a punchy engine, but forget about fuel economy with that one.

@carswithmula

10 ай бұрын

@@saix81 Diesels definitely have the advantage of the punch, this can also be experienced on the prado.

@saix81

10 ай бұрын

@@carswithmula with better consumption

@carswithmula

10 ай бұрын

@@saix81 👌🏾👌🏾

harrier all the way

Good work, I'll go for harrier any day... It will last longer though what I know is that higher trims have better infortainment systems

@carswithmula

10 ай бұрын

Thanks. I had not factored in its trim levels hmm...il look into that

Mazda is more appealing with good features and better pricing

@carswithmula

9 ай бұрын

I agree, value for money

lets start polepole will grow

@carswithmula

10 ай бұрын

Really appreciate that💪

What’s that harriers fuel consumption per L?

@carswithmula

17 күн бұрын

About 13km/ltr