Max Planck Quantum Theory

In 1900 Max Planck accidentally created quantum theory. Why? In this video I use his own words to describe one of the most radical acts in all of science.
My Patreon Page (thanks!):
www.patreon.com/user?u=15291200
To be added to my mailing list go here:
mailchi.mp/99c964be329e/kathy
As usual, the music is from the fabulous Kim Nalley. www.kimnalley.com

Пікірлер: 495

  • @CharlesCarlsonC3
    @CharlesCarlsonC35 жыл бұрын

    I've now watched this video several times and I really like the connective threads of research and theory that are made. I don't feel completely satisfied but am waiting for the next installments. It's such a cool story.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Charles Carlson Quantum stuff is odd and complex. It’s going to take me a long long time to get through even the basics of its history.

  • @NinJa-lr9of

    @NinJa-lr9of

    4 жыл бұрын

    I’m his great great whatever grand son last male I’m just now learn about him no one knew anything can y’all please tell me anything else you guy know reach out to me please!

  • @bobleclair5665

    @bobleclair5665

    3 жыл бұрын

    Sometimes,hands on thinking can give you a different perspective,, what frequency is the covid 19 virus,,,what frequency is a healthy person versus an unhealthy person ,,what metals

  • @martynparkman6336

    @martynparkman6336

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@NinJa-lr9of cbbbbb,

  • @SpotterVideo

    @SpotterVideo

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Kathy_Loves_Physics Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons.

  • @saulorocha3755
    @saulorocha37552 жыл бұрын

    It is remarkable how Planck, being an old school physicist, went against his own ideology and stood by the facts. This is pure integrity of character that you find in Planck and Einstein, both didn't liked what they found out but kept to the model that was more adequate to the experiments.

  • @jimsimpson1006

    @jimsimpson1006

    10 ай бұрын

    You might also add to that list the great Kepler, who realised that he had to abandon his cherished theory of the heavenly spheres when the observational data simply did not support it.

  • @imkira85
    @imkira854 жыл бұрын

    I wish Physics professors were more like you Kathy. For me it''s not just about the theory and the math but the history around the motivation and the how things were discovered that makes the whole thing interesting. Please keep up the great work!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    4 жыл бұрын

    Mário Freitas thanks and I’m glad you liked it.

  • @zes3813

    @zes3813

    2 жыл бұрын

    99%+ of them can't, these videos should be required for physics students and educators.

  • @kalebjohns7715

    @kalebjohns7715

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yeah to me, I don't understand things unless I know the history behind it.

  • @gavinmcgrath2303

    @gavinmcgrath2303

    2 жыл бұрын

    Couldn't agree more. I always found the history of physics as fascinating as the physics itself. And Kathy is so enthusiastic about her subject

  • @magtovi

    @magtovi

    2 жыл бұрын

    And not just makes them interesting, knowing the process of how they were discovered somehow helped me to get the knowledge to click inside my head.

  • @ronkirk5099
    @ronkirk50992 жыл бұрын

    I'm a retired engineer so I took the Physics series of classes in college, but these videos sure expand on and include some great historical perspective to the subject. Thanks!

  • @theklaus7436
    @theklaus74363 жыл бұрын

    How could I miss this. You are very good at explaining and the history as a part makes me feel happy

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    3 жыл бұрын

    This comment makes me happy too so we are even

  • @00xero
    @00xero2 жыл бұрын

    Love your videos Kathy :) I'm an EE by trade but I love watching these so I can reaffirm my understanding of electricity, and learn some more history that wasn't taught to me in school.

  • @lewiswithrow1936
    @lewiswithrow19362 жыл бұрын

    Kathy is a wonderful teacher explaining the most important discoveries which are sadly unknown to most our population.

  • @alvaroibanez60
    @alvaroibanez605 жыл бұрын

    To me you are a modern Jane Marcet. I have watched and liked all your videos and I find them original, entertaining and very instructive. I admire your generosity for putting so much effort on finding, reading original sources and coming up with such an original script, the result is spectacular, it is the best KZread channel on physics.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Alvaro Ibanez thank you so much. What a lovely compliment. 😊

  • @franzliszt3195

    @franzliszt3195

    2 жыл бұрын

    I see her like a James Burke of the classic UK series Connections.

  • @jakelabete7412
    @jakelabete74122 жыл бұрын

    I just discovered your channel and I like it very much. The blend of physics and history is so important. Ideas don't just appear from nowhere. Keep it up.

  • @DanielinLaTuna
    @DanielinLaTuna2 жыл бұрын

    I’ve watched several of your interesting and informative videos now, and am a new subscriber. You have an engaged and inquisitive mind, and your enthusiasm spills over in your research and presentation. Thank you so much for sharing!

  • @dave_dennis
    @dave_dennis2 жыл бұрын

    Kathy, I just love your personality and how it comes through. Your videos feel more like a friend explaining to me rather than a teacher lecturing. Far more compelling. And hats off to you for the way you tease the next episode. You do a great job of leaving me wanting more.

  • @Cassiro
    @Cassiro3 жыл бұрын

    Great video with excellent content. This was my first viewing of your videos, now it is time to check another of yours. Blessings.

  • @emceha
    @emceha Жыл бұрын

    4:21 Small jokes like this one is what gives your channel that extra spice, love it.

  • @roelskiunplugged1134
    @roelskiunplugged11342 жыл бұрын

    I really love your channel. I hope a lot more ppl will watch this, as it is both history and science which gives a better feel of how the science and ideas evolved and how they were related. This channel deserves multi million subscribers! On to the next video!!!

  • @jhill4256
    @jhill42562 жыл бұрын

    You give delight and familiarity to a very difficult topic. I look forward to your other programs, JD

  • @KevinToppenberg
    @KevinToppenberg2 жыл бұрын

    I love your down-to-earth presentation. And you give interesting facts that fill in the context of the time. I'll be coming back for more!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thanks

  • @asmithdev2162
    @asmithdev21622 жыл бұрын

    Great video!, I actually found a coin when maybe 23 years ago in the dirt one day turns out it is an old Prussian coin with Max Planck on one side and the Prussian eagle on the other, I was going through some old stuff and it led me to this video I've done my own research into quantum mechanics and I had no idea I had a coin with Max Planck on it for all these years

  • @valentin5403

    @valentin5403

    2 жыл бұрын

    You could see Schrödinger on Australian banknote if not replaced by Euro now.

  • @joweber1265

    @joweber1265

    Жыл бұрын

    It's not a Prussian coin, it is the old 5 Deutsche Mark coin of the Federal Republic of Germany

  • @D31Toastmasters
    @D31Toastmasters2 жыл бұрын

    That was so much fun! I love the way you are so excited about what you're talking about!

  • @douglasstrother6584
    @douglasstrother65842 ай бұрын

    "Planck’s Route to the Black Body Radiation Formula and Quantization" by Michael Fowler details Planck's thermodynamic analysis of the entropy of Blackbody Radiation, which motivated his hypothesis to satisfy Wien's Law at high frequencies. Planck's application of Boltzmann's Statistical Mechanics led to his conclusion that the material of the walls emit and absorb radiation in discrete quanta. It's a great read.

  • @muhammadshahzadphysicschan1524
    @muhammadshahzadphysicschan15242 жыл бұрын

    teaching physics with the context (history) is awesome. Thanks a lot for this video. Subscribed !

  • @johnrendle1303
    @johnrendle1303 Жыл бұрын

    Fabulously entertaining and educational. Quirky and fun and good. Very, very good!

  • @GrischaEkart
    @GrischaEkart4 жыл бұрын

    Wow, what a nice story you are plotting: Insightful, bringing in the characters and their interactions. Love it!!!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    4 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much!

  • @rosanella8
    @rosanella810 ай бұрын

    I've just discovered your channel and watched this video. Greatly enjoyed it, thank you!

  • @amritpatel3794
    @amritpatel37942 жыл бұрын

    I love to listen your scientific lectures. Fortunate to find you on KZread.

  • @otiebrown9999
    @otiebrown999911 ай бұрын

    First time I understood these connections. Thank you, Kathy!,

  • @thomaskeenan2208
    @thomaskeenan22082 жыл бұрын

    Nice explanations. Thanks for putting patreon plug at end. Many others put in beginning before viewers have chance to assess if even like, wasting time. If there is interest it is peaked toward the end if done well and more receptive timing.

  • @jackd.ripper7613
    @jackd.ripper76135 жыл бұрын

    You always leave me wanting more.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Aww thanks Jack. You know that as a Patron you get 6 more min of video right?

  • @Manoel_Manolo
    @Manoel_Manolo2 жыл бұрын

    Amazing. I loved this theme and your explanation of it. Thank you very much from Brazilian fan.

  • @erockromulan9329
    @erockromulan93292 жыл бұрын

    I hope to see your channel grow. I love your style!

  • @mazdaksheytunak6939
    @mazdaksheytunak6939 Жыл бұрын

    thanks for this awesome summary!

  • @jimimaze
    @jimimaze4 жыл бұрын

    I need a lot more statistical data about these guys. I see you have more videos. I will be watching soon enough. Thanks

  • @FeScully
    @FeScully3 жыл бұрын

    First time here and I subscribed. Great content!

  • @khalamona5319
    @khalamona53192 жыл бұрын

    long time since someone truly touched my heart by physics and history. I am glad I found your channel Kathy

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    2 жыл бұрын

    I’m glad you found it too. Thanks

  • @davidkuder4356
    @davidkuder435611 ай бұрын

    Kathy: This is a Really Spectacular midrash on the nature of "things..." Many thanks!! 🔥 ❤ 🎉 😊

  • @EntropicRemnants
    @EntropicRemnants2 жыл бұрын

    Really like your videos -- I just discovered your channel lately. Subscribed.

  • @rohit_1309
    @rohit_13092 жыл бұрын

    Before this video, physics research and its theories seemed completely discrete to me but now, after watching this video, they seem little less discrete. it has already connected some dots for me. i am new to this channel, i think i am gonna binge watch all of your videos and i think all these dots will be connected afterwards and an overarching structure of physics will be clear to me. Thank you Kathy!

  • @pittuvaraprasad9237
    @pittuvaraprasad92372 жыл бұрын

    Thank you mam for ur lecture on scientists ,their scientific theories and their relations.

  • @ronjon7942
    @ronjon7942 Жыл бұрын

    Oh wow. “If you throw a cup of water into the sea, you can’t get the same cup out again.” That statement is the most profound thing about statistics I’ve ever learned about.

  • @burcmm
    @burcmm2 жыл бұрын

    I luvvvv your videos, keep posting !

  • @absupinhere
    @absupinhere4 жыл бұрын

    I love you! Thanks for uploading this!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    4 жыл бұрын

    absupinhere you are welcome.

  • @LaoYing205
    @LaoYing2052 жыл бұрын

    You are just great. Thanks for doing these

  • @pakistancyberparty7244
    @pakistancyberparty72444 жыл бұрын

    Good stuff. Thanks for uploading.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    4 жыл бұрын

    Glad you liked it.

  • @FarhanAmin1994
    @FarhanAmin19942 жыл бұрын

    I loved this ♥️🥰🙏 More please, Ms Kathy! Edit: The last minute was even more amusing and sweet :)

  • @ThomasHaberkorn
    @ThomasHaberkorn2 жыл бұрын

    OMG in one sentence you corrected a major misunderstanding of mine about black body radiation. I'm so glad I watched this video. Have to watch the video about Kirchhoff right now

  • @jamesvesta
    @jamesvesta2 жыл бұрын

    When at first I think she's talking to me like I'm an idiot, but then halfway through I'm grateful for that trying to keep up. Well done. I learned a lot. Thank you.

  • @jbflores01
    @jbflores013 жыл бұрын

    I am a chemistry major from 1982. Physical chemistry was a blur...until now! Thanks for the intriguing and amazing background on how quantum mechanics and relativity developed! Thanks!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    3 жыл бұрын

    So glad I could help, sorry I wasn’t making videos in 1982

  • @soccerguyhammers
    @soccerguyhammers5 жыл бұрын

    Great video! Gotta respect the effort to dive down into the sometimes clunky history of science!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    soccerguyhammers thanks. I love the clunky history!

  • @Rwnepn

    @Rwnepn

    4 жыл бұрын

    soccerguyhammers I wish more physics was taught from a historical viewpoint. To me it is more interesting and makes more sense than presenting physics in a step by step mathematical point of view. Although both viewpoints are helpful in truly understanding the subject.

  • @johnlinley2702
    @johnlinley27022 жыл бұрын

    I am still aghast. Plank wrote Boltzmann’s equation. It will take days to accept this. And as always, your voice is perfectly suited for the history of science. Pure fun.

  • @nikolaikepler6977
    @nikolaikepler69773 жыл бұрын

    I enjoyed your explanation. Thanks!

  • @steveaspen6773
    @steveaspen67732 жыл бұрын

    I totally love you. The way you present anything!, is brilliant!!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    2 жыл бұрын

    I love the love. Cheers, Kathy

  • @steveaspen6773

    @steveaspen6773

    2 жыл бұрын

    Kathy.... I subscribed to your channel ❤

  • @steveaspen6773

    @steveaspen6773

    2 жыл бұрын

    Oh yes, I love Physics and all the History that formulated what Physics and Mechanics are today. Cheers to you🎊

  • @pradeepdixit6130
    @pradeepdixit61302 жыл бұрын

    Feeling so fortunate to watch your channel mam... Thank you.. ❤ from 🇮🇳

  • @physics_pratibha
    @physics_pratibha2 жыл бұрын

    I enjoy your each video. So thankful to you.. ❤️

  • @lachlanhughes3811
    @lachlanhughes38114 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video. Interesting and well explained. Thank you!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    4 жыл бұрын

    Glad you liked it.

  • @nouhkazemi4167
    @nouhkazemi41672 жыл бұрын

    This was awesome! Very informative!

  • @sreedharanm7308
    @sreedharanm73082 жыл бұрын

    I highly appreciate this lucid presentation on the birth of quantum mechanics. It was a historic moment that happened on 14th December 1900. A day to be celebrated.

  • @collieclone
    @collieclone2 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating video, and I'm now going to watch your other ones. One comment though: Wien is not pronounced like vine in English, but as veen (the same German pronunciation as Wien the capital of Austria).

  • @Italya3343
    @Italya33432 жыл бұрын

    Amazing video!!! 🔥🔥🔥 Many thanks for sharing! 👏👏👏

  • @jeffmolatore9234
    @jeffmolatore92342 жыл бұрын

    What a wonderful way to spend a few minutes of my life. thankyou

  • @Anarchosyn
    @Anarchosyn2 жыл бұрын

    I really adore your channel. Bit of a random thought, but I'd love to see you explore an offhanded comment mentioned in this video regarding Planck's rejection of the atomic theory Boltzmann's statistical approach was based upon. Many know the tale of the atom arising from the ancient writing of Democritus, but less known is how it reemerged in modern thinking, and why it would be regarded as controversial by somebody like Planck so close to the 20th century (what with it being seen as self evident these days). What I know of it is contained in this tiny passage in a book I'm reading called The Darkening Age, by Catherine Nixey, and simply reads: "

Democritus’ atomic theory did, however, come down to us - but on a very slender thread: it was contained in one single volume of Lucretius’ great poem, which was held in one single German library, which one single intrepid book hunter would eventually find and save from extinction. That single volume would have an astonishing afterlife: it became a literary sensation, returning atomism to European thought, created what Stephen Greenblat called “an explosion of interest in pagan antiquity” and influence Newton, Galileo and later Einstein." (page 40) Alas, not much else.

  • @NITHARSUN55555
    @NITHARSUN555552 жыл бұрын

    Excellent job 👌 easy to understand by hearing as a story with simple English

  • @crucifiedwithchrist9367
    @crucifiedwithchrist93674 жыл бұрын

    Came from an ad and wasn't disappointed!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    4 жыл бұрын

    CrypticHeaven glad you liked it

  • @louiemartinez2573
    @louiemartinez25733 жыл бұрын

    This was very well made thank you so much

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    3 жыл бұрын

    Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @lidarman2
    @lidarman22 жыл бұрын

    I learned about Rayleigh-Jeans in the 80s. Not only did they have holes in them, they were acid washed but they went well with my mullet.

  • @krishbhutwala130
    @krishbhutwala1302 жыл бұрын

    Great video! Would you be able to post the sources you discuss in the video? Would love to be able to follow your recollection along with the publications/resources you quote in real time to understand it better!

  • @Singularitarian
    @Singularitarian3 жыл бұрын

    These videos are fantastic. So good.

  • @MrRABIUL786
    @MrRABIUL7862 жыл бұрын

    You are amazing..Talks so well

  • @warrendargusch5873
    @warrendargusch58732 жыл бұрын

    A superb presentation....the best I heard.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    2 жыл бұрын

    Aww thanks. I did a whole biography of Max Planck because he’s just fascinating and I felt bad that this video didn’t include much of his personality or influence in the 20s

  • @oddedges
    @oddedges4 ай бұрын

    thank you so much for this!

  • @michaeltellurian825
    @michaeltellurian8252 жыл бұрын

    This was really good! Subscribed, shared.

  • @proudsnowtiger
    @proudsnowtiger5 жыл бұрын

    Never seen that photo of Forkbeard Maxwell before. Worth the price of admission by itself.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    I just want to go back in time and tell him to shave it off. He was so cute clean shaven and looked 100 years old with the "forkbeard" (he he). But looking at Boltzmann maybe those crazy beards were the fashion at the time.

  • @JoonasD6
    @JoonasD65 жыл бұрын

    Pronunciation note: Wien is pronounced /vi:n/ (or "ween" trying to imitate English phonetic spelling). More generally, for German names 'ie' is pronounced /i:/; it's the order 'ei' that for historical reason or another seems to be commonly well-known by English-speakers (to my amazement) such as in Einstein, pronounced /ainʃtain/, although the German way of pronouncing the st-cluster has been widely dropped by English-speakers. Great video. :)

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Joonas Mäkinen thanks for trying to help me - German pronunciation is particularly difficult for me for some weird reason. Luckily, I’m done with Wien (I think) but there are many more to butcher. Kathy

  • @jeffwells1255

    @jeffwells1255

    4 жыл бұрын

    Wow, another language geek like myself! Nice comment but you meant to write "veen" instead of "ween" up there, so consider your own self to be corrected, politely of course. Also, the cluster "sp" in German is pronounced "shp," Max Planck is "Mox Plonk" and Maxwell's middle name is pronounced "Clark" - and that's supposed to be English, the Scottish version anyway.

  • @ewqdsacxz765

    @ewqdsacxz765

    2 жыл бұрын

    "Veen", "wean" or "vien" (rather than "ween") would be a more obvious English phonetic equivalent to the German „Wien“. The Germans pronounce their and the same way as native Anglophones pronounce their , but Anglos would pronounce the word "west" differently from "vest" -- and would tend to hear the difference in such pronunciation. Not only that, but if left without contextual correction, the difference in pronunciation would account for a difference in meaning -- at least in English. Nothing of the like exists between the German "wagen" and "vagen", which are phonetically identical to each other. Thus, for English but not for German, the difference between /v/ and /w/ is said to be significant to a "phonemic" extent, beyond mere "allophonic" variation.

  • @gerhardsteinmayer3176

    @gerhardsteinmayer3176

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jeffwells1255 wrong. Max Planck is NOT pronounced like you think.

  • @in2minutesorless64
    @in2minutesorless642 жыл бұрын

    You are excellent! That was wonderful! I'm subscribed.

  • @julianramirez4465
    @julianramirez44655 жыл бұрын

    I love this story, and the whole reject and controversy that Planck's paper created. Thanks Kathy, keep on, we are growing.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks Julian. And thanks for helping me grow!

  • @martinmalloy8119
    @martinmalloy81194 жыл бұрын

    it s such a joy watching your videos Vielen Dank :)

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    4 жыл бұрын

    Martin Malloy thanks

  • @mirkovukovic6517
    @mirkovukovic6517 Жыл бұрын

    I am working through Planck's derivation of Wien's displacement law (Ch. III in Part II of his "The Theory of Heat Radiation). I *think* that I am starting to understand his train of thought and arguments. I'd love to learn (from, ahem, you) how Wien came to understand and derive his law. My brief searches on Google did not lead anywhere. All derivations I have seen (except for a 2000 paper by Cole) derive it from Planck's black body formula. Anyways, absolutely awesome videos.

  • @AliKhan-1966
    @AliKhan-19663 ай бұрын

    Absolutely loving this. Thaaaaanks

  • @alastairchestnutt6416
    @alastairchestnutt64165 жыл бұрын

    Really enjoy your presentations. All new to me. School physics did not cover this.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Alastair Chestnutt all I learned was Planck’s equation not why he made it. We really need more history in our sciences or everything comes from thin air.

  • @markstewart9038

    @markstewart9038

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@Kathy_Loves_Physics I would argue that all disciplines should be be taught in a(n) historical manner. It enables one to get a glimpse of the process of thought. Love your videos!

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    Mark Stewart totally agree. However, I think literature, for example, is often told from an historical perspective whereas the sciences have been stripped of their stories. Glad you liked the videos 😊

  • @otambi2786
    @otambi27862 жыл бұрын

    Going back to my physics classes during early 80's ❤️👻

  • @jaydeepraijada5159
    @jaydeepraijada51593 жыл бұрын

    It's An AMAZING video... That's what i want Some history and why they have this ideas...

  • @mnada72
    @mnada722 жыл бұрын

    These videos are a wealthy source of information that brings it all in order. Thank you

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    2 жыл бұрын

    So glad you liked it

  • @new-jj5il
    @new-jj5il4 жыл бұрын

    I don't know how to comment but I want to comment " Your videos and Prof Walter Lewin lectures are giving one type of satisfaction to me in this restless highly dynamic world.Thank you mam" I read your biography and right now, I feel me as one of the kids sitting in your classroom in San Francisco... With lots of love💚 B T Balavinayagam

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    4 жыл бұрын

    This comment made me feel so good. I am glad that I can add some sunshine in these dark days. And you made me look up Walter Lewin and realize that I had watched a ton of his videos without remembering his name! What an honor to put me in the same category as him. Thank you. Your teacher in spirit, Kathy

  • @sgatea74
    @sgatea742 жыл бұрын

    This is very good ! Thanks for creating and sharing this with the community of "fellow citizen scientists" 😀

  • @carlmiller8900
    @carlmiller89002 жыл бұрын

    Thank You, Kathy.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    2 жыл бұрын

    You’re quite welcome. If you like this video you might like my three pirate biography I did on Max plank which goes into a detail about his life and his influence on the progression of quantum mechanics

  • @rashediqbal823
    @rashediqbal8232 жыл бұрын

    Browning motion-like presence in quantum field foam may be the basis of plank constant. Oscillation length may be plank length, and period ( pendulum) might be plank time. It is like walking on marbles that are vibrating.

  • @baraskparas9559
    @baraskparas95592 жыл бұрын

    Great presentation. Thanks.

  • @astroceleste292
    @astroceleste2922 жыл бұрын

    thanks for subtitles

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    2 жыл бұрын

    You are welcome. Actually hired a company to do it so I hope they did a decent job.

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie95512 жыл бұрын

    Very convincing reasons. This is why relative-timing ratio-rates of resonant probability, is the temporal superposition log-antilog making of Everything in Statistical Theoretical Analysis, a Quantum Computational AM-FM In-form-ation substantiation, in/of self-defining Polar-Cartesian coordination in/of wave-packaging, be-cause-effect standing wave fractal bubble-modes of conic-cyclonic dimensionality.

  • @zulqarnainchaughtai
    @zulqarnainchaughtai2 жыл бұрын

    Can you share the link of original paper of Kirchhoff (english version if available)?

  • @saylensya
    @saylensya2 жыл бұрын

    thank u! I understood so many things after this s2

  • @upendraagnihotri2686
    @upendraagnihotri26862 жыл бұрын

    Thank you maam. Can you please explain how entropy is additive magnitude and probability is multiplicative.

  • @sabya23
    @sabya235 жыл бұрын

    It's not entropy, but change in entropy that cannot be less than zero in a closed system, according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It's the 3rd law that says entropy is always positive and zero at zero Kelvin.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    5 жыл бұрын

    steppenwolf I am so embarrassed. Of course you are totally correct. Thank you for pointing out my misstatement. Oops.

  • @sabya23

    @sabya23

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@Kathy_Loves_Physics it happens, but the equation on the screen stated it properly, so it's ok.

  • @backwashjoe7864
    @backwashjoe78642 жыл бұрын

    Hi Kathy. Have you read the book Einstein and the Quantum: The Quest of the Valiant Swabian, by A. Douglas Stone? He covers this story and more in tracing Einstein's involvement in quantum theory. Its a fun read, and I think you'd enjoy it! Its great to see another telling of the story here, and I'm looking forward to watching your related videos. Keep up the great work!

  • @sagnik7237
    @sagnik72372 жыл бұрын

    After watching i am thinking to give my whole life in quantum physics...❤️

  • @kirklaird8345
    @kirklaird83452 жыл бұрын

    Nicely done.

  • @abhijeet9670
    @abhijeet96702 жыл бұрын

    I love it. Brilliant video.

  • @TheNameOfJesus
    @TheNameOfJesus2 жыл бұрын

    So far I've enjoy your videos. I would just ask that you not allow text in the video to appear at the bottom in the same place that KZread's captions are displayed, because then I have to turn captions off, backtrack, rewatch, then turn captions on again.

  • @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    @Kathy_Loves_Physics

    2 жыл бұрын

    Good point and I am sorry I will try to fix that from now on.

  • @TheNameOfJesus

    @TheNameOfJesus

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Kathy_Loves_Physics How nice of you. Thanks. You may be the first channel to take this into consideration. Thanks.

  • @pjmoran42
    @pjmoran422 жыл бұрын

    These are really good. The hands are distracting so the close up shots help.

  • @jenko701
    @jenko7012 жыл бұрын

    As always absolute pure gold .

  • @discoveringthegardenofeden7882
    @discoveringthegardenofeden7882 Жыл бұрын

    Minute 8 comes to the point of the modern confusion about QM. The Planckian math exists in order to be able to say something about a continuous medium. For the purpose of math, we need to discuss reality in numbers, the equivalent of that for physics are numbered packets of energy. Nature is not quantized, nor is energy. Effects can be quantized (such as an orbital jump around an atom) , but the energy being pumped in to get quantized effects itself is continuous. The map and the conventions used to make the map are not the terrain. The problem is that many nowadays believe the map is the reality.

  • @gaureearolkar1522
    @gaureearolkar15222 жыл бұрын

    wonderful info...