The main thesis of Dr Rehman is that Quide Azam wanted to make Pakistan a secular country not a theocracy. He is not discussing whether partition was good or bad, but he is clarifying that Quaid wanted a secular parliamentary system.

@Taimur_Laal

2 жыл бұрын

This is the key. Absolutely correct.

@poco7654

2 жыл бұрын

With due respect, Quaid e Azam himself was confused. There is contradiction in his statements.

@bodhisattva6308

2 жыл бұрын

@@Taimur_Laal he would have succumbed to the islamists even if he intended to make a secular country in my humble opinion. He was conscious of his image among the Islamic orthodoxy. While he has his Parsi wife convert to islam, was not at all happy about his daughter marrying a non- Muslim. It reflects to me that although he was liberal in personal life he probably wanted to keep orthodoxy happy. Just a humble opinion

@birdoflaments

2 жыл бұрын

Lol. Even this thesis is not only historically but simply philosophically incorrect. I urge you to read the book ‘Pakistan Between Secularism and Islam’ by Tarik Jan published by IPS, Islamabad, to challenge your current views. For the truth seeker, only Quaid Address to the Bar Association Karachi is sufficient. Stop reading secularism into Quaid :)

@birdoflaments

2 жыл бұрын

Neither the propagators of Islamic governance demanded a “theocratic” form of governance since theocracy is itself not an Islamic concept. This is shoddy scholarship on the part of desperate secularists. If you equate Islamic governance to theocracy then I welcome you to study Islam and its history first.

The imperialist was the British Raj but it is interesting to note that in Pakistan we are told that we got independence form Hindus and not from the British Raj.

@SydAliHsn

2 жыл бұрын

Because the founder of Two-Nation Theory (Syed Ahmed Khan) was a British boot-licker.

@azamcangame5253

2 жыл бұрын

No one ever said this to me... I don't know in which Pakistan do you live

@learnenglishwithhamid

2 жыл бұрын

@@azamcangame5253 Just read Pakistani textbooks especially the great Pak Study

@learnenglishwithhamid

2 жыл бұрын

@@azamcangame5253 Read the article ' Images of the 'other' in school textbooks and Islamic reading in Pakistan ' by Tariq Rahman.

@ayeshanoor7412

2 жыл бұрын

@@azamcangame5253 All India Muslim League was a pro British and pro American party. Campain for Pakistan was done in UK. Quide Azam took oath of allegaince to the British monarchy when Pakistan became free

Incredible. Sir you’ve opened up a new window for me to contemplate the ideological differences at the time of independence. Seems like I’ve found a new assignment for the next few days. Thank you sir I’m so gald I’ve found you❤️, it’s like I’ve truck gold.

Exactly, Muslim league didn't want a country modeled upon Islamic Sharia but it was a battle for Nationalism or separate Identity which was partially Islamic.

@humanworld7774

Жыл бұрын

May be but promise struggle to islamic Pakistan k naam pr kiya tha Pakistan ka mtlb kya lailaha illallah Rhi baat minority rights ki islamic state minority ke religion me dakhal nhi deto muslim me dakhal deti hai like sood sharab zina homosexuality co education red light area movies dramas etc Or jinnah ne jaan nhi di thi vo log the Jo islamic Pakistan k naam pr millions of people's shaheed hue millions of people apna ghar baar life paisa jameen sb chhoda Secularism chahie tha partion q krdiya jisse muslim teen tukdo me bat gye isse na ki sirf Indian muslim ka blki Pakistani bangladeshi muslims ka bhi nuksan past se present tk brbad hogya dekhlo current Pakistan kya haal hai vo bhi sirf 1 saal Pakistan pr Raaz krne k lie really me nhi janta jinnah ka asal niyat ka tha but y disaster tha na islamic country bn pae na economy

بالکل درست باتیں کی تھیں مولانا مودودی رح نے۔

thanks for videos today.... i saw two videos of yours today.

One of the enthusiastic and rational person who has the ability to bring out the broken and hidden pieces of reality Live longer Sir 🙏🏽

Keep on doing this effort, best thing in your discourse is that you have been polite. No need to hope or desire early results.

Sayyed Abul ala Maududi was right in this issue 💕💕💕💕

🌹🌹Respect & Regards from 🇮🇳 India for the courage & sincerity of journalism 👍🏼😎

very nice historical analysis

Its pretty commonsensical. Pakistan movement was nationalistic not islamic. Islam does not support idea of nation-states. He was just being honest with his opinion which was influenced by his scholarship. P.S: Hameed Nizami's counters were solid..

@humanworld7774

Жыл бұрын

May be but promise struggle to islamic Pakistan k naam pr kiya tha Pakistan ka mtlb kya lailaha illallah Rhi baat minority rights ki islamic state minority ke religion me dakhal nhi deto muslim me dakhal deti hai like sood sharab zina homosexuality co education red light area movies dramas etc Or jinnah ne jaan nhi di thi vo log the Jo islamic Pakistan k naam pr millions of people's shaheed hue millions of people apna ghar baar life paisa jameen sb chhoda Secularism chahie tha partion q krdiya jisse muslim teen tukdo me bat gye isse na ki sirf Indian muslim ka blki Pakistani bangladeshi muslims ka bhi nuksan past se present tk brbad hogya dekhlo current Pakistan kya haal hai vo bhi sirf 1 saal Pakistan pr Raaz krne k lie really me nhi janta jinnah ka asal niyat ka tha but y disaster tha na islamic country bn pae na economy

Very enlightening

Great analysis, Doctor. 10/10 for taking out time to gather all the relevent excerpts.

Thanks Sir

Indeed he was right.... Syed political thought is usually misunderstood ♥️✌️

Allama Iqbal n Molana Modudi ki kitab al Jihad fil Islam k baare m frmaya tha k mustaqbil m ye kitab musalmano ki sar brahi kregi. Btw molana was 21 then. What a genius! His students like Dr israr and molana ishaq became the smartest of scholars from the east. Dr. Bilal Philips became muslims by ready molana. Wish i could meet him

Sir Aap ki videos buhat hain kaafi seekhnay ko mil raha hai. JazakAllah

ڈاکٹر صاحب، زندہ باد! خوش رہیں! آپکی کاوشیں انمول ہیں، جاری رکھیں! صد شکریہ

Sir u r excellent 💞

You were one of the very few people I used to listen and follow up in the left wing but this video made me realise that these quotes are out of context and you’re literally misguiding individuals with this. I’ve noticed alike before but this one’s too clear. It’s better to read ‘Hameed Nizami’ Sahab yourself everyone and assess the terms and contexts he was relating to and was making with his replies and statements here. At other places too as our time is not the same and it’s very easy to misguide on contextual basis. Ps: I’m not much supporter of JI and I’ve my differences but I couldn’t resist myself here writing down this comment as the video is misguiding.

@SN-il6ip

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed the information provided is out of context, was hoping for better representation of facts :(

Dr Taimur sahib. I do want to point out that Jinnah and the Muslim League would never be fans or tolerant of Marxism or Socialism. The reason I say this is because, Muslim League was full of aristocrats and feudal lords (heck they wanted to maintain this system after the British left, whereas Congress wanted to eliminate it). Marxism and Socialism is a threat to feudalism. Correct me if I am wrong. It was Nehru who was more of a Socialist and was friends with Gamal Abdel Nasser and Yasser Arafat.

زبردست

Sir piz books recommendations pay AK video banay

Boht khoob 👍

*taimur sir... please.. a video on your library tour.*

Excellent analysis

Your opinions are always out of the box n worth listening. Thank you 💜

Love the young look sir! Keep your hair young🙂🙂

Moudidi had his own opinion regarding the partition. He was merely a human and liable to make false assumptions. Partition was an inevitable phenomenon that was bound to happen, sooner or later.

@humanworld7774

Жыл бұрын

Jinnah bhi galat ho skte hai na like aaj halat Pakistan k bta rhe hai or promise struggle to islamic Pakistan k naam pr kiya tha Pakistan ka mtlb kya lailaha illallah Rhi baat minority rights ki islamic state minority ke religion me dakhal nhi deto muslim me dakhal deti hai like sood sharab zina homosexuality co education red light area movies dramas etc Or jinnah ne jaan nhi di thi vo log the Jo islamic Pakistan k naam pr millions of people's shaheed hue millions of people apna ghar baar life paisa jameen sb chhoda Secularism chahie tha partion q krdiya jisse muslim teen tukdo me bat gye isse na ki sirf Indian muslim ka blki Pakistani bangladeshi muslims ka bhi nuksan past se present tk brbad hogya dekhlo current Pakistan kya haal hai vo bhi sirf 1 saal Pakistan pr Raaz krne k lie really me nhi janta jinnah ka asal niyat ka tha but y disaster tha na islamic country bn pae na economy

Good job

great taimoor bhai 👍

Well sumup!

Ye to bahut hi zabardast batey ki ti madudi Saheb ney. Even still we are confused to determine the purpose of Pakistan. Kash saro ne mukhalifat ki hoti ya sab Islam ko as nizam tasleem karney per mutafiq hotey.

Sir please do a video log on Abul kalam azad

After reading about and of Maududi writings , conclusion is he was a perfect example of Tradionlist Muslims. Jinnah was a practical , human being who tilt and accepted the Gods Concepts after understanding. My Vote is for Jinnah

What is the solution of all these problems?

kindly share pdf of haft roz kausar plz

Pehly 2 mints video mai di gaie hawaly se zahri tawr lgta hai k Mududi sahb Pakistan bnny k ni blky Muslim league k jumat k tareqa kar, qeyadt mai baaz anasir etc se ekhtlaf rakhty ty. Any way as usual healthy and intellectual commentery though i m not agree Keep it up Comrade

True 💗

What was his views before death? Make a video on that too :-). I want to know that too

where is your first video on this topic, taimoor bhai !

molana modudi was 100 percent right and now proved .

Apni library ka visit karway

Sir I complete agree with you

"My opinion may have changed, but not the Facts that I'm Right". I think history proves that MAM was RIGHT!

Sir video about russia n Ukraine war.ple.

Balon ko color aye ustad e mohtram . I love you sir 😘😘

You has a right to disagree from JI but should not give your own meanings to someone article by choosing a piece of it. It’s called dishonesty. The you are blaming is the author of a book with two volumes on the issue of Muslims of India and independence. He presented the partition as one of the solutions in 1938, even before 1940. Muslim league published his articles and distributed to counter the arguments of anti Pakistan lobbyists.

Good sir taimur shb Love u sir Sir please aik pakistan ki political party's pr video bnao aur in parties k leder democratic hein ya nhi especially mian nawaz shref aur imran niazi aur ppp pr please

Hello prof, hope you are well. You speak about many issues that I'm very interested in but unfortunately I don't speak Urdu. I humbly request more English videos? I realise this may be inconvenient, but I hope that it's possible. Many thanks.

@hyp3rtriton976

2 жыл бұрын

go to the taimur rahman -english channel its for english videos only

@makegoodcoffee

2 жыл бұрын

@@hyp3rtriton976 thank you I didn’t know there was an English channel.

@someboy5809

2 жыл бұрын

Where are you from brother?

Well-done Brother Taimur Rehman.

Is criticising Redcliffe commission award irrational ? ( even excluding the islamic narrative )

@Odyssey392

2 жыл бұрын

@Left's Progression I am merely questioning the way it was done. Done by a lawyer who had never set foot here earlier. The same done with a little less haste and by geographers might have been different, or better!

@danishchaudhry2759

2 жыл бұрын

@Left's Progression maybe they did it this way on purpose

Plz make videos about political instability in pak

imran khan stopped all trade with india in 2019. now shehbaz wants to restart the trade. your views on this trade ban and revival of trade

@Taimur_Laal

2 жыл бұрын

Trade with India is good.

@vinamrasinghai2339

2 жыл бұрын

No one knows what it banned in the first place.

مودودی صاحب ایک اچھے انسان تھے، ان کی اپنی سیاسی رائے تھی جس سے متفق ہونا ضروری نہیں، علماء ہند پاکستان بننے کے مخالف ہی تھے، بچپن سے یہی سنتے آئے ہیں۔

Well referenced talk.... this is how one should defend his argument.

Dr Sahab Love from India🇮🇳

❤️

taimur sahab we want you sit with qaisar sahab plz so that we can say who is right.

آپ مولانا مودودی کی تحریر میں یعنی "قائد اعظم" کا لفظ کیوں استعمال کر رہے ہیں؟؟ کیا یہ انٹلکچول بددیانتی نہیں ہے

Me fundamentalist ho or aj se pehly hamesha ye samajta rha ky pakistan religious maqasid ky liye hasil kiya gaya. Or un tamam logo ko jahil e mutliq samajta rha jo is ky bar aqas baat krty thy. Kiyo ky aj se pehly kisi ne explain ni kiya, hawaly ni diye. U r an honest n learned man. have my respect....

So can one draw a conclusion here that Muslim league used Islam only as a slogan/naara to invoke the sentiments in Muslims of India and fuel the separation movement?

@dhabstudio

Жыл бұрын

yes we can, I mean After Quaid early death after partition. Muslim league didn't have honest, true leadership. 1959 was start of martial law where a Skindar mirza a civilain Ruler initiated martial law for his personal clinging to power

Sir, You quoted molana Madudi statement to prove that Pakistan was made for secularism. But you ought to show statements of Qaid e Azam too,in which Qaid e Azam categorically said that pakistan a state, in which all rules and law of state will be as per islam..... . Show that too

@javedbutt6222

Жыл бұрын

Qaide Azam and his companions never wanted the radical Mullah shahi which we have today in Pakistan.Qaide Azam appointed sir Zafrullah Khan a Ahmadi his foreign Minister a Hindu his law minister and a Christian the first chief Justice of Pakistan.

مولانا کی بات درست ہے

Moududi was 💯 right.. current situations are proof..

Why you did not mention what molana madudu R.A says in 1955 when pakistan become islamic. Hypocrisy of a libral

Professor u r absolutely Wrong in your calculation... Agar sarmayakar zakat day ya vadera zakat ushar day to gurbat Khatam hojaye gi... Calculation kar kay dekho ....

It’s amazing what universe our Indian neighbors live in. As the saying goes, brother you see a speck in my eye, but ignore the log in yours. Watching the state of affairs of Muslims in present day India, I know where as a Muslim I’d like to be.

@rohitkashyap7476

2 жыл бұрын

Well, the thing with Muslims ( some not all) is that they live in an us and them world. The state of Muslims in India is that Mosques are not bombed. They rule the film industry...( So many Pak actors might want to live in Pakistan but they want to work in India) Same can be said about sports or education , medicine Indian muslims have more visa free countries, Kadyanis and Shias are not persecuted in India. Indian muslims don't make videos of random girls in Turkey and get named and shamed. Indian muslims are not named in the global terror lists ...they walk proud and confident on Indian passport Jab tak communal chasma laga.kae rakhoge , you will live a.misreable life regardless of which country you live in.

@vinamrasinghai2339

2 жыл бұрын

Okay, so why never moved? What is the state of Jains in Pakistan?

@ammarkhalid874

2 жыл бұрын

Dude what sort of bs medieval mentality are you spouting?! India by all measures (socially/economically) is decades ahead of Pakistan and before talking about the status of minorities in India you should focus on the state of affairs of minorities in Pakistan? India has already had a few Muslim/Sikh/lower caste state leaders and respects multiculturalism to a large extent. Remind me, when was the last time a Hindu/Christian became President/PM of Pakistan? Oh right, your people killed or drove away most of them right after partition. Look at the state of your own country before commenting on India

@parjanyashukla176

6 ай бұрын

Well we are also happy to see you in a separate country. What a coincidence!

Pakistan was a mistake; it hurts to say this I’m also a Pakistani. But apart from Jinnah majority PML leaders were just landlords wanting to continue their power by getting a Separate country

I'm Secular but Molana Maududi was right woh sab sach bol rahy thei bohot hi ajeeb tarikey se partitionhui hai or bohot jaldi hui hai

@waqasome

2 жыл бұрын

To Moulana sath dety PML ka or theek kerwa dety sab kaam. dour dour bethy bas keeray nikalty rahy?

@MewNewPhysics

2 жыл бұрын

@@waqasome Bro ye un ka kam nai h na. politician jb mazhab ko bech m gusaen ge to mazhabi scholar bolega na k bhae is m niat mazhabi nai h. thats not his job to get into politics. He just replied to those who use the name of islam to gain audience even tho theres nothing islamic about it. I like Muhammad Ali Jinnah but obviously he was of secular mindset, to gain audience he had to use the chocolate of religion to attract people

@waqasome

2 жыл бұрын

@@MewNewPhysics This is total wrong. Islam and politics is side by side. Didnt Prophet Muhammad do politics when dealing with non-muslims and khufa continued the tradition.

@MewNewPhysics

2 жыл бұрын

@@waqasome Yes brother.. you are right.. islam and politics are side by side. What it means is that rulers or politicians or khalifah should make decisions according to shariah and obviously the ulema should guide them if they make mistake. Whats problematic in Quaid e Azam's(RA) case is that he was not interested in khilafah or islamic state, so Molana RA said it openly what Quaid actually wants, it made these seculars angry. Btw I like Molana so much, and also i like Quaid too. They both did good for muslims in their own ways. Dono hmare brhe hn

4:05 he looks like Dr Bhim rao amedkar.🤔

سر ایک دن علامہ اقبال کے فلسفہ پر بھی مفصل ویڈیو بنائیں ۔۔۔۔ انکا فلسفہ بالکل بھی سمجھ نہیں آتا

ویسے پروفیسر صاحب ایک ویڈیو اس موضوع پر بھی بناتے کہ بھارت کے کروڑوں مسلمانوں پر فاتحہ پڑھ کر آپکے قائد آعظم نے پاکستان بنایا کس لئے تھا؟

@raahehaq263

2 жыл бұрын

Ho ge ap k humaray ni hai..

@MohsinExperiments

2 жыл бұрын

تاکہ مسلمان آزادی ہوں۔ ہم کھلے عام جب چاہیں گائے کی قربانی کر سکتے ہیں لیکن انڈیا کے مسلمان ایسا کر کے دکھائیں!

@UsmanAli-dp5pf

2 жыл бұрын

Jiasy juttay apko India ma parh rhy ha 😂😛😀uskay sadybaab ky liay

@ahmadkhatib6617

2 жыл бұрын

@@UsmanAli-dp5pf آپ الگ نہیں ہوتے تو نہ ہمیں جوتے پڑتے اور نہ ہی بقول آپ کے وزیراعظم کے نہ آپ " بھیک منگےؓ" ہؤتے۔ دونوں کا فائدہ ہوتا نہ!!😃

@UsmanAli-dp5pf

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadkhatib6617 mtlb wo rooti k Jo juttay kha kr milay wo thk ha bhooka rhny sy thk waisy, hr admi apny faislay krny k liy nai paida hota kuch doosrun ka khawab pura krny ki liy sirf indhan ka kaam deny k liy bi paida hotay ha 😂😛😀agr sb engineer bn jain tou phr mazdoori kon kry ga

If Jinnah wanted a secular state then why he wanted partition on the first place?

Sir inky sath sath maulana Fazl Ur Rehman sb k walid sb bhi khilaf thy Quaid aur Pak bnany k

Good job for bringing it up....i think maududi vision is correct otherwise things would not have been favorable for the British under khalifat.

Dr sahab Quide Azam also want a state where Muslim can live freely . So molana ..

If you were present in that time, would you support the creation of pakistan or not?

@islamandlondi8206

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely not.

@universalscience360

2 жыл бұрын

Yes we stood with jinnah.

@ShahJee101

2 жыл бұрын

despite hindutva and india being turn into a soviet style dictatorship. i might be opposing it because Muslims being in huge numbers in one country might be in better economic situation where all the recourse would be spending on development rather than proxy wars

@arhamgill3595

2 жыл бұрын

@@islamandlondi8206 Didn't ask you but ok

with respect, is this video for Jamat-e-Islami fans? Everyone has political views so did he. What's the point for us general public Sir jee?

کبھی اس بات پر بھی ڈسکشن ہونی چاہیے کہ کمیونسٹ جب بھی اقتدار میں آتے ہیں تو انسانوں کا قتل عام کیوں کرتے ہیں؟ یہ اپنے رویے میں اتنے سفاک کیوں ہوتے ہیں؟ اور قیصر آحمد راجہ جیسی علمی شخصیت سے بحث سے فرار آپکو زیب نہیں دیتا آپکے جواب کا انتظار رہے گا

Sir with due respect aap molana Moududi ki ray ko ye sabit kr rhy hein k wo creation of Pakistan k khilaf thy jo miss qout kr rhy hein aap. Aap molana Moududi ka masla qomiat parhein pher jwab denna

Kia bat ha madudi g ki Matric pass thy bs Na hi kisi madressah sy parhy thy Ab kia kahon ma inko

Mukhalif q tay as lay kay musliman taksim hongay or pakistan ma sharia law nahe aya ga

Sir voice in your videos is low. Please consider this problem in upcoming videos as your videos are valuable.

Sir agar pakistan ki movement bhi secular thi aur indian movement bhi secular thi to raste alag alag keun the?

@Taimur_Laal

2 жыл бұрын

Secularism is not the only thing on which people disagree

@vinamrasinghai2339

2 жыл бұрын

On the idea of liberalism, culture, history, governance model, land rights, Hindutva etc. The majority of the countries of the world have signed the UN charter for Human rights.

Moulana moududi was 100% right

Apkay dalil islam kay name pa Pakistan bana nay kay bad islam nafiz na karnay pa ke na kay Pakistan kay khilaf

If Jinnah was secular then why did he endorsed Direct Action?

ونسٹن چرچل کی کتاب میں پشتون معاشرے کی منظر کشی کا حال. جیسے : 1- پشتون بسکٹ چائے میں بھگو کر کھاتے ہیں اور اسکا اصل لطف اٹھاتے ہیں ۔ 2- شعر وشاعری عشق سے بھرپور ہے مگر معاشرے میں عملی عشق کی سزا موت ہے۔ 3- اپنی محبوبہ سے عشق کرنے پر فخر کرتا ہے مگر اپنی بہن یا بیٹی کے عشق کو برداشت نہیں کرسکتے۔ 4- موسیقی کو خوب انجوائے کرتے ہیں مگر موسیقی والوں کی عزت نہیں کرتے انہیں حقارت سے "ڈم" کہتے ہیں جو کہ گالی کے برابر ہے. 5. پشتون زیارتوں پر ہر وقت حاضری دیتے رہتے ہیں اور اکثر اپنے بیمار بچوں کو دور دراز سے شفاء پانے کی خاطر ان زیارتوں پر لاتے ہیں. In such a state of society, all property is held directly by main force. Every man is a soldier. Either he is the retainer of some khan. تحریر امجد علی اُتمانخیل.

Dr Taimur's thesis is always lensed and sided. Just because Modudi accused the league secular doesn't necessarily make it one. What are you going to do about Jinnah's statements on Shariah allocation and an Islamic republic? My point is Jinnah's vision is contradicting and diverse, because of which everyone cherry picks and utilize for their agendas. I'm not here to support Jamiat or Modudi even I want secularism but at least bring the whole picture, such kind of dishonest analysis is keeping our society unprogressive. Jinnah used Islam and secularism both to beg Pakistan and that's a reality just live with it.

The unfortunate thing is we are an lslamic county and there is no sharia in Pakistan. And we still today follow Anglo Saxon . Only if we had focused on MOLANA Abdul Qalam azad and didn't got partitioned things would had much been messed up like today

Kiya fark parta ha hr shakhs ki apni Raye hoti ha..

Sir if Mududu sab was an ardent opponent of pakistan then why he migrated. I mean he could stay in India like rest of the muslims

@Odyssey392

2 жыл бұрын

Someone had to hijack a secular Pakistan, Jinnah died a mysterious death. We can just speculate.

@uzairaziz4879

2 жыл бұрын

@Jasmine It was even worse pre-partition During partition, when people were moving across the borders on trains, there were scores of hawkers on the stations that would chant "Hindu-Pani lelo"/"Musalman-Pani lelo". Now that tell me how is that even remotely tamed than post-partition( even water had a religion back then). At least some Muslims survived that kind of prejudice by migrating to Pakistan I can tell you the references of this historical fact if you need

یہ تو بالکل ٹھیک ھی کہہ رھے تھے۔۔

What’s is point? People who think Making Pakistan was a bad decision they should move to India so poor Indian Muslims can migrate to Pakistan. Moulana,s decision was a political decision.

@ahmadkhatib6617

2 жыл бұрын

وہی میں کہ رہا ہوں ۔ اگر پاکستان نہیں بنتا تو بھارت میں مسلمان اچھے حال میں ہوتے ویسے بھی آپلوگ وہاں کچھ کر تو سکے نہیں ۔ کیا آپکے شریفوں اور زرداریوں سے بہتر سونیا لالو ممتا اور اویسی نہیں ہیں ؟

@h.i3677

2 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadkhatib6617 wow. Wo kase achay halat mein hote. Balke ab pakistan mein jo kuch muslim bach jaye gae agar waha hute tu sab mare jate.

مولانا مودودیؒ نے فرمایا: “پاکستان ایک مسجد کی طرح ہے جسکی حفاظت ہمارا فرض ہے۔” کتاب: تصریحات اور ہاں ہم وطنی ریاستوں اور نیشنلزم کے خلاف ہیں کیونکہ پوری روئے زمین ہمارے اللہ کا وطن ہے۔ اس لئے روئے زمین پہ خلا ف ت قائم کرنا جماعت اسلامی کا مشن ہے۔

@hgkjkj

2 жыл бұрын

جب جناح کے بعد مودودی کی سنی گئی اور سیاسی جماعت بنائی تو کافی کچھ بدلہ اس نے اپنے خیالات میں کتاب پڑھو سید ولی رضا کی مودودی کے بارے

@hgkjkj

2 жыл бұрын

ویسے بھی اسکے پاس تھا ہی کیا ہر بات کو مسجد اور مندر کے تناظر میں دیکھنے کے علاوہ پاکستان مسجد تھا تو یرہ مسجد ٹوٹ گئی تھی ١٩٧١ میں جب یہ دولخت ہوا- جس میں جماعت اسلامی کا بہت بڑا رول تھا-

agar aaj Mudodi sahab zinda hotay tou ap pakistan kay mojooda bohran mai kia kehtay....

As you have data and if you are brave, please give remarks and evidence about pashtuns against Pakistan at the time of creation and early days, years

@muhammaduzair6022

2 жыл бұрын

If pushtoons were so against then why they fought against India in Kashmir ? After independence ?? Please elaborate. Those time Pushtoon has no such leaders...and don't think ANP Leaders as Pushtoon Leaders.

@Tabeeb-cs3ut

2 жыл бұрын

@@muhammaduzair6022 you have no knowledge as you are just a bot because if they fought from Pakistani side then Kashmir will have to be part of Pakistan not India. So according to your statement it is prove that they fight from indian side

JI slogan was for an Islamic republic not a nation state. Be straight that you disagree to the idea of a Islamic Republic of Pakistan.