Great video. Do you have one for Components and Cladding? Breaking these topics is so helpful and engaging. Keep it up!

@QuickQuestionEngineering

3 күн бұрын

@@JulieFreund Thank you so much for the encouragement. My next one will be on the All Heights MWFRS method and then I’ll get into C&C!

thanks for this video! It 's really useful for me!

@QuickQuestionEngineering

4 ай бұрын

Thank you!

thanks a lot!

very informative and clear video, keep it up man!

@QuickQuestionEngineering

4 ай бұрын

Thanks! I hope to post the next videos on this series soon

@waynewang1423

4 ай бұрын

Great! I just feel like wind load are quite complex maybe I should say tedious. This envelope method I found is like most convenient method. I am probably going to use automation method in STAAD and compare with this simplified method. @@QuickQuestionEngineering

Great video. Wind is so much more complex than seismic. Lucky most of my design is seismic governed

@QuickQuestionEngineering

10 ай бұрын

Thanks! I personally think seismic is more complicated, especially due to all the extra detailing and requirements. I guess it also depends on what you do more at work

@dcvo89

10 ай бұрын

@@QuickQuestionEngineering true. Way more requirements

Bravo!! for me, It was a perfect explanation. I hope you can show us the other methods or someone else can tell me where I can find them.

@QuickQuestionEngineering

26 күн бұрын

I posted videos for three methods on this playlist. Only one left now which I’ll post soon. Thanks for watching!

Please do topics on connection for all members. How to calculate spacing simpson h2.5a, a34clip, nailing spacing,etc., i have confusion on designing this due to what load to be consider and procedure for calculation.

@QuickQuestionEngineering

8 ай бұрын

That’s a great idea! I’ll add this to the list for future videos. Thanks for watching and for the feedback!

Obrigado

@QuickQuestionEngineering

29 күн бұрын

De nada!