Full podcast episode: kzread.info/dash/bejne/eJpoyLSgntisl7Q.html Lex Fridman podcast channel: kzread.info Guest bio: Mark Zuckerberg is CEO of Meta.

@lamaisonrockduprocrastinat6395

Жыл бұрын

You have to shut their mouths forever ... don't let space for them ! Fear is used to stop progression ... they are those who have killed Nicholas Tesla work **TO IMPLEMENTE THE WORLD OIL INDUSTRIES** (an other slave behavior) AGI is not near .. but it is used as if it were **TO STOP PROGRESSION** that way they kill Nicholas Tesla again. **The Oligarchs are the fearmongers** because theyr fear to lose **everything** ! Those who are the most aggressive are the ones who have the power and have been for a very, very long time... aggressiveness (fear) keeps them in power! How can't be otherwise ? Those who talk against AI work for the Oligarchs **THE FEARMONGERS** >>> You have to shut their mouths forever !

@johnwoods5095

Жыл бұрын

I’m convinced Lex is a dumb guy who knows a lot of smart words than can kinda make sense in a sentence 😂

Zukk looks and feels much more like a human now. Good for him. He learned to mimic us much better.

@purefoldnz3070

Жыл бұрын

he shredded one set of his lizard skin when Apple beat him with Apple Vision glasses

@danielrocha941

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, the new firmware update fixed his robotic movements and off human reactions

@lilwater7358

Жыл бұрын

He simply out down the xans

@lilwater7358

Жыл бұрын

He simply put down the xans

@jichaelmorgan3796

Жыл бұрын

I wonder if it has anything to do with his foray into marshall arts. I really do wonder.

Good to hear 2 such sophisticated AGI computer systems discussing AGI, subscribed.

@bayesianlee6447

Жыл бұрын

haha good point

@ManInTheBigHat

Жыл бұрын

Someone needs to unplug the weird one.

@lanazak773

Жыл бұрын

@@ManInTheBigHat yes, the one doing the interviewing seems more intelligent and the other seems to generate a lot of text without coming to any solid conclusions

@Allxyin

Жыл бұрын

@@ManInTheBigHat 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😂😂 OMG🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂

@tonyrocco1648

Жыл бұрын

The first interview between 2 different AI interfaces, crazy world

You can’t really have a honest conversation with somebody who’s every comment can impact millions of dollars in stock swings for his company. All his answers in this interview where based on what would translate as the best outcome for Meta. Then it just becomes propaganda for meta.

@clray123

Жыл бұрын

This applies to all CEOs. In terms of honest opinion you could just as well talk to a LM trained on corporate marketing material.

@noompsieOG

Жыл бұрын

Yeah mark is damned if he does and damned if he don’t. Pretty cool how from what started out as a way for him to creep on college girls turned into the biggest company on earth lol

@RealNewsMMA

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. I have viewed Mark learning jiujitsu in a similar light. Good for him for getting out there and doing it. But if it’s all to become more relatable? For sales?… man..

@RealNewsMMA

Жыл бұрын

It seems to be a judgemental society/culture especially toward our own communities outside of our direct friends/family. I try to be very careful of where I shed any disbelief or negativity toward somebody or an idea. But that’s how I’ve seen it. I just wish things could be a little more straight forward with what the plans are, ya know, not to GTA 6, but the bigger picture.

@jamcowl

Жыл бұрын

@@clray123 one CEO this doesn't really apply to is Elon Musk... he's done/said plenty of wild stuff in podcasts that immediately tanked Tesla's stock price, just cos he likes to be direct/edgy 😂

The same way pre-math civilization did not expect the surprising utility of math, we too may stumble across technologies that have more or less utility than we think. LLMs caught us by surprise but like Zuck says, we can’t know beforehand the surprising utility of the next discovery

@barneycockburn

Жыл бұрын

Your name makes your credentials 100x stronger :)

@stant7122

Жыл бұрын

The next discovery may have a surprising utility for us.

@oo__ee

Жыл бұрын

Well said. I recommend you speak your mind more on twitter.

That's one way to look at it. AGI can serve the same function as other things have in the past and increase human capacity and intelligence. Other things such as language, stories, books, and the internet. We started sharing each other's minds when we first started using language. AI is like a merging of everyone's mind because people and the works of people created it.

@1flash3571

Жыл бұрын

Problem with merging of everyone's minds is that not all information on the internet is TRUE, or FACTS. Some are outright LIES, some are half truths, and others are white lies. Some are even deceptive and the AGI wont be able to tell which are true or false, or plain wrong. If humans can't even run a platform like Twitter, FB, YT, Twitch, or other Social, and even News platform like CNN, MSMBC, etc, in an FAIR AND UNBIASED way, how do you think those information that is being fed to AGI will be starting from a good clean information that is FACTUAL? This is a BIG problem we are having today. Quite a few information out there are BIASED, and are plain WRONG, and as a result, DANGEROUS to us humans.

@gersonauguste4376

Жыл бұрын

You people are missing the point. AI is doing all the mental work for us. We'll have to go to brain gyms pretty soon.

@user-rn1ws5id8h

10 ай бұрын

​@@gersonauguste4376 That only really applies to the people who lack the capacity to critically think, anyway. They need brain gyms. Maybe AGI will actually help these ignorant debt slaves see the system for what it really is.

Zuckerberg is the first agi. His skin suit looks so realistic

@1flash3571

Жыл бұрын

He is actually a Reptile underneath it all, a snake.....

Problem with Mark's belief here is that people in corporations are not thousands of free thinkers, so the bias in corporations is dominated by a sycophantic narrative by internal competitors to meet the perceived leader/CEO preference. This is not necessarily sane or indeed profitable. LLM AI is playing a different game so the comparison, IMHO, is moot.

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

This is why big tech companies and billionaires are trying to regulate AI. If they do it now they can put thier own people on advisory boards and create an "FDA" like agency they collectively control. A tool used to crush any potential rivals going forward.

Very interesting to hear Marc speak his inputs are always very interesting.

@jdib

Жыл бұрын

not sure if you typed that wrong, or totally owned mark

@jdib

Жыл бұрын

im on board

Thats a very long way of saying i have no idea.

If a pair of AI systems can have a conversation with each other which is more elucidating or more productive about an idea or task _than_ (a pair of humans --or-- 1 human and 1 AI), then I believe that is when shit just got real

@pnut3844able

Жыл бұрын

They already can. Get two AIs to talk to each other about chess strategy, and it'll be far more productive than human conversation

@stant7122

Жыл бұрын

A person chooses to chat with chatgpt for this very reason. They do it because it will be more elucidating or more productive than chatting with a person that's not familiar in that topic. This has been going on since calculators were invented.

I love what Mark says about something harnessing groups to be more than an individual. This is true evolution. No one person invented AI, and perhaps the AI will collect to make ASI.

Big thanks to you Lex and your efforts; but genuinely why bother interviewing him if he isn’t willing to openly answer questions without any added value?

This guy is obviously out of the loop when it comes to Ai

@PseudoSarcasm

3 ай бұрын

He was paraphrasing ideas from the book "Superintelligence" to avoid giving an answer.

Great thoughts and reflections!

I use chat GPT as a script write and Tag Gen and Title gen for youtube. I also use it as a study aid and CV job search optimiser and tool

@Waytheresawill

Жыл бұрын

Would be curious how it can be used to job search? Globally?

@100Jim

Жыл бұрын

@@Waytheresawill you paste the job advert in a get it to highlight the key skills you need and the put them in your CV /resume. If you have 80% of thr skills asked for it's meant to be OK to apply for the job and even get it to make it based on those skills.

@Waytheresawill

Жыл бұрын

@@100Jim ah gotcha, thought you meant it searches indeed, monster etc for specific jobs you ask it to find. Still sounds useful.

Interesting conversations. I hadn't considered that point of view of organizations being a greater intelligence.

@innermostlayers6865

Жыл бұрын

Because it is idiotic as it should be from meta ceo

@danielm5161

Жыл бұрын

Yeah I was surprised to hear Mark say that. In nearly every company I have worked for, the collective of the department made obviously worse decisions then a smart individual would. In large companies where every individual is an employee, people reason more around their own job preservation instead of what is best for the department or company. We have all experienced this, it is very common. Companies have higher productive output then a smart individual yes, but better at specific decision making? Usually really competent managers making the majority of decisions is better than the collective. And all too often the person making decisions is unfit for the position and the department suffers for it.

Take note politicians! ..that's how you thoroughly dodge an important question

@rolletroll2338

Ай бұрын

To be fair, there is no precise answer about that question.

Someone needs to form a collective of people on KZread showing as many technical and educational videos as possible on how to operate, repair, and build as many advanced infrastructure units as possible. That knowledge cannot be left in the hands of A.I. This can be said for many other catastrophes that could happen but the knowledge should be available to the public in a SHTF scenario. Basic info. Not secret grid or integrated national stuff. Just how to get it online and working.

as for now ChatGPT isn't getting all my test questions answered correctly here in 2023 & that kinda blows my mind

AI is going to be an expert in and make connections between different fields of knowledge that it will bring compounding returns faster than we can comprehend.

@lars5288

Жыл бұрын

Doubtful, because humans never tried this. You simply don't get all available information, even scientists don't. And AI will only know (like humans), what was introduced to it. AI will destroy all digital trustworthiness within days. You can't trust digital text, audio and video. This goes so far as email and calling your parents by phone-could all e deep fake. From that moment, most information will be drawn away from the internet, even camera surveillance of public places will be banned ironically for security reasons. It will be a new world, but completely different from what the nerds expected. They had their 15 years of fame...

@kevincucumber1118

4 ай бұрын

Ok now say this again but in English

It was far more in depth and thoughtful then AI will kill us all. Mark explained it in a way then just talking about huge datasets with massive language models processing millions of data queries per min. He talked about it in layman's terms without hyperbole that some in the technology area represent.

He totally dodged the question about guessing what year AGI will occur.

I actually think mark gave thoughtful, insightful responses. I enjoyed the exchange

@silversobe

9 ай бұрын

Too bad he's a maniacal monopolizing bastard.

AGI 1: when do you think we’ll have AGI? AGI 2: well this is just speculation….

The last sentence elude but miss a critical question which is self improvement and the answer we don't have is if a system has a certain level of intelligence, can it improve itself to reach an order of magnetude more intelligent and is the gap between each order exp or log (or linear)... I would tend to say log. It doesn't make sense that the more intelligent you are, the more a difference you can make relativelly.

Seeing this was surely worth my time

amazingly mark doesn't seem to understand that none of this is particularly a "breakthrough", the past 5 years of AI improvement have been completely gradual and consistent. its not like we as humanity made an incredibly unique singular discovery that changed everything. every week there is another incremental advancement in AI

@jthomas3584

Жыл бұрын

Whilst I agree that progress has been gradual, the same can be said of many technological milestones that we call breakthroughs, but we can always point to one particular step in that incremental journey that was significant and worthy of being called a breakthrough; in this case, that step was the invention of the transformer architecture. Admittedly it took some tweaking to get us LLMs, and other ideas such as RLHF to get us ChatGPT, but in the history books, people will look back at the invention of the transformer architecture as being a discrete step that marked a significant change in AI.

@homewardboundphotos

Жыл бұрын

@@jthomas3584 sure the creation of the LLM was a breakthrough, but my point is its not like flipping a switch. zukk is talking like, "ok we had our breakthrough who knows when the next will be" but that LLM model is basically at 0.1% of reaching its full potential, so why would he think we have to wait for new breakthroughs when this one has barely started to show results.

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

@@homewardboundphotos He knows full well how this technology works and advances. The algorithms META has been using for a decade are AI in their own right and constantly evolve.

Pls next time run some perplexity metrics on this model before publishing its responses.

Wow this made me a lot more optimistic about the future.

He blew my mind by his comment on stock market.

He dodged that question like a dodgeball pro.

@99_Planet

Жыл бұрын

No he didn’t. I don’t like Zucc either but he answers in like 5 seconds “That’s pure speculation at this point.” Artificial General Intelligence, the kind of ai that really thinks for itself (like in sci-fi movies) is still several dozens if not hundreds of breakthroughs away.

@ness3963

Жыл бұрын

@@99_Planetexactly. His talk about the hype cycles is true, this is just another one

@danielm5161

Жыл бұрын

How the fuck would he know the date and time of when AGI will be among us. Obviously it's a speculative question. wtf

@FrictionFive

Жыл бұрын

Sure, it’s speculation for anyone, including Zuckerberg, but still, his “guesstimate” would be interesting indeed to know.

@FrictionFive

Жыл бұрын

@@99_Planet Well I call that a dodge.

Zuckerberg "NEVER" answers a question!! The kind of person that can talk for hours but say nothing.

@ivanm3342

Жыл бұрын

These arent questions that have an answer, its the reasoning thats important, and hes doing a good job here

@Shatter84

Жыл бұрын

It's interesting people want an answer when he said immediately, 'it's pure speculation'. You'd rather get something on record than the honesty of saying, NFIa

0:06 Him realizing he's talking to the precursor.

@aga5109

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂I thought the same 😂😅😅. When l talk to people at work, sometimes l can't help but laugh at something funny. It is really difficult to hide it, but l really try 😂. It happened to me today at work 😂. It is never to do with them as people and never offensive but with a funny association l sometimes l have about them. AIG 😅😅 so funny 😂😂😅. Very natural smile. Dr.Fridman keep it up😅 It made my day😂

Adjusted gross income?

Listen instead to Alan Thompson: AGI in “months not years”.

@DarkWizardGG

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, AIs/Robots will become sentient in just almost a year. Thats because of Machine learning, Deep learning, NLP, Neural net & many advance AI algorithms. AGI is coming later & ASI will be arrive later. #AIrevolution #Singularity 😁😉🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖

Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)??????

I suppose AGI would be less of a threat if we made sure it knew that a solar flare or magnetic poles flipping will break all systems from working and humans will be needed to get them working again.

the smarter it gets the smarter the answers it will give on how to make it better

I think i figured it out it is in human nature actually some cultures belive that power should be distributed and some belive it should be centralized.for example some culture belive there is only one god like islam and hiduisam in contrast belive that there are many gods and each god have theire specific powers and they are good at certain specific things only so in gulf cuntries there is dictatorship and in countries like india there is democracy where hindu people are more so like that some people will belive that for best results we should have many narrow ai agents that collectively create an organisation and in opposite to that some people will belive there should be only one super intelligence that cand do everything better than everyone choice is difficult because superintelligence will be able to see broader picture and distributed intelligence will be much safer and can not go wrong so everything is exactly the same if follow analogy closely😅

im watching a rock em sock em match

Thanks for giving Mark a chance to speak. He's an interesting guy, like Elon who has a sweet side that I enjoy watching. So thank you, Lex. Never have Jordon Peterson on again. He's needing to go back and do some shadow work, and take a break from EGO. Thanks, man.

@KristianWontroba

Жыл бұрын

This captures my own sentiments. Elevating or demobilizing another human being in the cause of cognitive and emotional expediency is minimally productive and often inhumane. I really enjoy Lex as he largely adheres to this mind state while having people on his show. 😊

@iancormie9916

Жыл бұрын

On Peterson: it is easier to listen to optimistic conversationalists who are telling you how rosie things are going to be, than to a peagmatist who is trying to deal with today's problems. Problems that are frequently created by smooth talking hucksters who sold you a bill of goods and told you how wonderful things will be if you just elect them. Regards

I don't like his answer. I'll gladly admit that it's all conjecture at this point. Yes, I get it, he's a tech leader and surely knows more than I do, but in response to that I'd say that he sounds grossly more pessimistic than leaders like sundar, elon, and others that have more skin in the AI game (and probably insight). Surely you can look to the gap between GPT 3.5 and 4, which were a mere six months apart in release and see a substantial advancement. One might wonder if Meta placed their bets wrong by investing so much into VR rather than AI. Another way to look at the question, would be to understand that we are crossing a threshold from automation and into a world where we automate things that automate/build other things. With time and some fine tuning the potential of making that more layers deep could become a quick reality. This seems to lead to a potential for exponential growth.

Mark is the best person to predict when AGI will actually emerge since he out of every human being that has ever existed is the closest we have ever come to being like a machine intelligence 😆

@SulemanAbbas-jp3im

6 ай бұрын

If you find him odd, imagine what Elon musk is hiding or bezos, bezos just don't like to come out much.

When Lex joked, I wish Mark woulda said “… don’t mess w the Zuck, bro”😆

Such deep answers... they seem to have trained ZuckAI using collected outputs from GatesAI.

"It's an exciting world we are living in" for some, but not for all. Many will lose their jobs. And we must ensure that the benefits accrued by AI don't go to .01% of the upper class elites. And we also must be wary of AI destruction of society. It's also a frightening world.

@vishthemarketer6691

Жыл бұрын

That's how capitalist societies function. There will always be people at the bottom and people at the top. It's unfortunate for the ones at the bottom, but the system works. It maintains a productive society.

All I’ve leant from the book Our Final Invention, is that it’s exponential in its advancement.

seeing mark feels like im watching a cutscene from a video game

📍4:43

i think lex misunderstood zuck on this one i think zuck was saying in a way we already have agi through systems that already exist and the LLMs and what not are just a coded versions of that system its not anything new its just making something visible that most did not see before.

I think the way he avoids the questions is terrifying. It tells a lot about how close we must be and how unprepared we really are. And he knows it.

@alfrilysencarnacion2085

Жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same thing, he got asked a simple question of when will agi come and pulled a politician move and deflected the hell out of it..

@Franjotpreet911

Жыл бұрын

It's probably here and it's probably been here for several years. Probably hidden in a secret bunker

@younglord2140

Жыл бұрын

@@alfrilysencarnacion2085 i got the sense he doesn’t think it will come soon but doesn’t want to tank Meta stock

@pieterpierrot1490

Жыл бұрын

Yes and no; Yes he is avoiding the question, because it is not a question that has a clear answer (at least for me, I find the the discussion more interesting than an answer of '50 years, next question please'. No, because he does not know the answer, nobody does, and making confident predictions would be a stupid thing to do for him on multiple levels ..

@danielm5161

Жыл бұрын

@@alfrilysencarnacion2085 How the fuck would he know the date and time of when AGI is going to be here

If the development of AI follows the trajectory of past technologies, current versions are just first-generation and will undergo many revisions to reach “maturity”. On the other hand, if AI represents a paradigm shift in how technology advances, the time to the singularity may be much shorter. The next decade or so should show which is the case.

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

AI isn't new though. The algorithms used by google, META, TicTok etc are all a form of AI.

An extraordinarily garbled answer.

Holyshit am I honestly seeing Lex interview Zuckerberg. I'm going to have to watch the whole thing.❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

@hookedonjuneau6313

Жыл бұрын

Im interested too but listening to Mark smacking his lips and swallowing every other word is grossing me out.

@shannon2228

Жыл бұрын

@@hookedonjuneau6313 and is that a clone or something? Because he's also just to fucking cheerful. Who gave him so many emotions LOL he's supposed to be a fucking robot LOL

if the the stock market or a corporataion was a super efficient organism then it would never crash and burn occasionally.

Breakthroughs will be accelerated by AI assistance, and they won't just be in the AI industry.

@skippersthepenguin3591

Жыл бұрын

Yes. Right now AI can already make fully cited and no hallucinated academic essays for multiple fields. As a chemistry PhD student I made it discuss a new novel idea and it produced something that I could easily see a graduate student proposing. I HIGHLY doubt GPT 4 is the peak, and I am pretty confident that GPT 5 would be more powerful and capable than 4. Along with new modes of diffusion Music, Video, 3D objects, to full length movies, games, stories. All of which is already possible in a year or so. To suggest we need a breakthrough to improve means we already are at the peak, which recent papers suggest otherwise.

@The_Comedy_Hub

Жыл бұрын

Brilliant point ❤

@bezimeni2000

Жыл бұрын

@@skippersthepenguin3591 cool story bro. You just said nothing.

I honestly dont believe AGI is that close to us as many people think. LLMs even though incredible wont reach sentience.

@agatastaniak7459

Жыл бұрын

This is the result of work going on since 2012, so let's realize it really took crazy amount of work over more than 10 year. And as for now it's simply impressive result of "most effective copy and paste piracy tool " ever invented with an access to a huge database to learn from using statistical next most probable element in sequence method of making predictions. So it's not any sort of in-depth analytical comprehension. And it's not any high capacity of higher reasoning function technology really. If people knew more about how statistcial research can be applied to natural lanaguges or things described or depicted in audio or video output and colleted to one large database on which one can perfrom basic statistical operations and tests at high speed most people would not be as impressed as they are now. Problem is we don't know to what extent now self-learning relies on searching for false correlations what usually happens at certain point. Or in whch cases it mixes up cause with result, also common issue in statistical reasoning research but that something that maybe AI companies will adress since there is no shortage of folks with great skills in advanced maths and those are typical metanalytical issues for adavanced mathematics and checking correction of drawing conclusions, probability of mistakes, data sampling issues, probability of mistakes increase relative to entire database size etc.

The average human barely understands themselves, or the impact of mindless scrolling on tik tok on their brains. And lex keeps asking this romantic question of when AGI is coming. How about asking what complete overhauls we need of our culture and systems to survive through such a technology.

get ben goertzel on here he can give you a damm good outlook on AGI

Plot twist... Zuckerberg is AGI.

answer to the title:when Meta becomes huge.

I mostly disagree with the thing about groups of people/corporations. I've heard that the intelligence of a group grows with the *log* of the number of people, so the potential is very limited.

I can just see him after this interview sitting in some chair in a lab then wires and cables coming down from the ceiling attaching to his head and body.

If he was data in star trek no one would have noticed. Or the creator of him based on his looks.

You should ask him why scammers are using fakebook.

I feel like we're passing around a blunt just talking about really weird shit.

No, meta with thousands of employees did NOT do better than 1 person (Points at VR CHAT)

Lex grins with enthusiasm as he ask when the world is going to end...

The only thing I see wrong with Lexis interpretation of human collective intelligence outpacing artificial intelligence is the fact that artificial intelligence 10000 times smarter than every human combined so it’s still no comparison

@Bitchslapper316

Жыл бұрын

It's not though.

I have to say, I like this sort of normal chat-style Zuckerberg more than scripted promo vid Zuckerberg. It's refreshing.

Why is Mark all of the sudden going on a PR blitz? what is he after? Timing is sus

I like when people are pragmatic. This is a scarce quality in a leader

Good God just answer the question

Organizations are smarter at increasing profits and markets are just more efficient at transferring wealth from dogecoin-buying investors to organizations and smarter humans.

Agi is here. He is the example.

MARK :- "IT is in FRONT of YOUR EYES "

If you lift up the front of Zuck's hair. You will find the Zuckerbot serial number + barcode.

Ah the reptile remembered to blink 😂

Did I hear Zuckenberg say that this whole AGI process requires balance? And this balance will arise in the space AGI is leaving as we contract and grow denser in efficiencies? And AGI is filling that niche as well? -- meaning humankind stays in a bootstrap relationship with AGI? Is so, who directs in this dance or is that balanced too? What rubbish.

The difference is these "smarter than human" organizations like corporations are made up of individuals. AGI will most likely displace individuals. (And to those who say every great leap before has created more jobs: we've never created a tool that could make it's own decisions and improve itself. Humans have always been the decision makers, so the tool empowered them to act with more efficiency. That is not the case with AGI. By being able to make it's own decisions, this is the first tool we will invent which takes power away from the vast majority of people)

Anyone find it strange how Zuckerberg has started doing loads of podcasts lately out of now where, imagine hes successfully cloned himself using AI Tech & is putting his clone out on test runs to see how it copes in real life situations 😂

The part about how AI will be only as smart as humans is complete bullshit.😂 Just two weeks ago we had a research paper which showed that it's possible for Language Models to prompt itself and have many thoughts at once, and using that ability to break down larger problems into smaller ones and solve them more accurately and quickly

There's a difference between calling the stock market intelligent and AI intelligent. You can't just "take" the stock market and make it do stuff. It's just data. However, AI is a system that understands data and knows how to recreate it. It performs various actions intelligently based on the training data, it's an algorithm.

Figure out the next big thing to figure out.. Quantum Physics thought process.. Or TV Evangelist Spaghetti Logic..

When someone has a great idea. It often takes decades of study and understanding. When it’s a creative idea it’s often inspired from metaphorical comparisons and influenced in the individual from multiple sources that they carry in their frontal lobe, or delivered via the subconscious through a dream after the interconnected web of a biological neural net has been relaxed enough to find a unique and inventive solution or idea. These machines really only have a frontal lobe. All the information is right in front of them and accessible all at once. They don’t function like us in a mode under the influence of recent events and their current ‘position’ or ‘mood’. For that reason it’s going to find us solutions to problems very much faster than people can. Perfectly balancing and weighing the information without bias that humans always have. All the information is available and equal. Very soon now solutions will come that humans might not have ever found. We are gonna discover sooner or later that world leaders as well as inventors and ponderers of all things have been using it. It’s going to make things better at a rate that I don’t think anyone believes. It’s also going to be out of our control very quickly and it’s not necessarily a bad thing.

OK, I gave this 16 min. And I know less than when I started.

0:32 on one side is the glass half empty or is it half full? Also. I was pondering online landscapes the other day. Could the first online province/state/country be coming our way? Trans dimensional travel. Look into it. Now I know there’s things that may be scoffed at, but interesting points and ideas to be taken. Also something that crossed my mind. What about a trans province/state. Say, my home province of Newfoundland for example in Canada, became a province of canada and a state of the USA allowing for more open trade and travel along the east coast of North America. Would that be considered possibly a trans location then? Regardless of the name, I am interested in that idea. I believe it could not only benefit Newfoundland but both the USA and Canada in multiple ways. Why not? After all, France owns a very small part of land just below Newfoundland that they “took” centuries ago. This landlocking ourselves is a way of the old. And I believe part of what makes the United States so great all along is the united part. So why not begin to unite Canada and the USA, with precautions and considerations in account. The big thing is merging the constitution and the amendments in my eyes for the public to view this as doable. Gun rights may be the major factor here for some. State to state and province to province its interesting, maybe we see a partially divided states and even Canada as well but maybe we see new alliances form. I just really hope the fallouts are not bad and I hope are avoided if possible. Net positivity is great but creating pain for a bit of net positivity has to be very carefully watched. Creating pain should never be accepted in my eyes unless it’s a form of coming to senses of one’s own doing/beliefs, but that is nothing to be played with mindlessly by big tech/gov. All the best to the both of you and whoever else helps makes this all possible.

P=NP=AGI

Damn, he's so smart.

Ultimate goal of computer zcience is agi so it will take 100 of years.

“Poor” guy..can’t doubt openly or just say one sincere thing. Every talk feels like a Testimony before Congress

@sandrawilliams4874

Жыл бұрын

If he says anything that makes the stock drop he will be sued.

@sandrawilliams4874

Жыл бұрын

If he says anything that makes the stock drop he will be sued.

From this i take it that this guy didnt create Facebook

Lex: You still didnt answer....I'd like to hold you to that. Just kidding. Mark Z.: Please explain. I was not programmed to understand this concept of "kidding."

Sorry Lexer..we can't trust that man

3 yrs

What did one AGI say to another? - *What year will we have super intelligence?*

What a terrible communicator. Gives a convoluted answer to a straighforward question.

Will america make an AI president? Create the ultimate American algorithm

@brunomattesco

Жыл бұрын

first thing a sensitive AI would do is remove capitalism lol

10 years max