"Madness, Psychiatry, and Economic Reason": Nima Bassiri in conversation with Marco Ramos
A conversation on the economic norms embedded within psychiatric thinking about mental illness.
Over the course of the nineteenth century, various forms of madness were subjected to a style of psychiatric reasoning that was preoccupied with money. Psychiatrists across Western Europe and the United States attributed financial and even moral value to an array of pathological conditions, such that some mental disorders were seen as financial assets and others as economic liabilities.
In this event, critical theorist and historian of science Nima Bassiri will look to the intertwined histories of psychiatry and economic thought to show how this relationship rendered the most common forms of social valuation - moral value, medical value, and economic value - equivalent and interchangeable. If what was good and what was healthy were increasingly conflated with what was remunerative (and vice versa), then a conceptual space opened through which madness itself could be converted into an economic form and subsequently redeemed - and even revered.
Nima Bassiri is a critical theorist, historian of the human sciences, and assistant professor at Duke University, where he teaches in the Program in Literature, Duke’s interdisciplinary humanities and cultural studies department. He is also co-director of Duke’s Institute for Critical Theory. His first book, Madness and Enterprise: Psychiatry, Economic Reason, and the Emergence of Pathological Value, is published by Chicago University Press.
Website: www.nimabassiri.com
Book: press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/...
Public Writing: www.thephilosopher1923.org/po...
Marco Ramos is a historian, psychiatrist, and Assistant Professor at Yale University. His historical research focuses on mental health activism and revolutionary politics in Latin America.
Twitter: / mramos_histmed
Public Writing: www.bostonreview.net/articles...
Пікірлер: 4
I’ve had this creeping intuition for at least a couple of decades… Great work, we all need to get to the empirical basis of this, and seek angles for integration. I will definitely look into the sources mentioned - again deepest thanks!
Incredible
Great
Very interesting. Terrible format. Would have prefered it to be a back and forth conversation.