M106 - MEGA MASER QUASAR - Deep Sky Videos

Ғылым және технология

Dr Becky Smethurst discusses Messier 106 (aka NGC 4258) - and the world of megamasers.
More links and info in full description ↓↓↓
More Messier objects: bit.ly/MessierObjects
More of our videos with Becky: bit.ly/Becky_Playlist
Dr Becky Smethurst: rebeccasmethurst.co.uk
Read and see more...
Orion spectrum: www.bu.edu/prism/pages/orionsp...
NGC 7213 spectrum: ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/M...
Evidence for a black hole from high rotation velocities in a sub-parsec region of NGC4258: www.nature.com/articles/373127a0
A geometric distance to the galaxy NGC4258 from orbital motions in a nuclear gas disk: www.nature.com/articles/22972
Amazing graphs via Numberphile: bit.ly/Amazing_Graphs
Deep Sky Videos website: www.deepskyvideos.com/
Twitter: / deepskyvideos
Facebook: / deepskyvideos
More about the astronomers in our videos: www.deepskyvideos.com/pages/co...
Supported by the University of Nottingham
Back us on Patreon: / deepskyvideos
Video by Brady Haran

Пікірлер: 157

  • @annayosh
    @annayosh4 жыл бұрын

    small misspeaking, but large difference - M106 is not 22 to 25 lightyears away, but 22 to 25 megalightyears

  • @BIGWUNuvDbunch

    @BIGWUNuvDbunch

    4 жыл бұрын

    You mean the mega maser quasar is mega parsecs away?

  • @bellsTheorem1138

    @bellsTheorem1138

    4 жыл бұрын

    That had me confused too.

  • @CelticSaint

    @CelticSaint

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yes, if it was 25 light years away we'd be in serious trouble!

  • @passthebutterrobot2600

    @passthebutterrobot2600

    4 жыл бұрын

    I know astrophysicists love approximations, but this is ridiculous

  • @RockHoward

    @RockHoward

    4 жыл бұрын

    Not the biggest astronomy error I have ever witnessed (that was 10 ** 200), but this one got my attention. Ha!

  • @superdau
    @superdau4 жыл бұрын

    I guessat 9:50 you meant 22-25 million light years away? 25, 25 thousand and 25 billion wouldn't make sense and the number 22 to 25 is too specific for it to be something else like 2,5 or 250 something. [EDIT] yeah, 5 second google for NGC 4258 would have told me that.

  • @ChucksAstrophotography
    @ChucksAstrophotography4 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating information, this galaxy is a very popular target in the night sky for astrophotographers.

  • @GionKunz
    @GionKunz4 жыл бұрын

    I love M106, thanks so much for sharing your knowledge!

  • @DrBecky
    @DrBecky4 жыл бұрын

    Oh my Universe - my chipped nails 🙈no one look!

  • @SquaredSmith

    @SquaredSmith

    4 жыл бұрын

    I am far to interested in you being excited about space to notice your nails

  • @adamwright7332

    @adamwright7332

    4 жыл бұрын

    Becky the gorgeous star I see that sparkles in any deep field returns. If I discover a star Becky I would name it after you

  • @LeoWattenberg

    @LeoWattenberg

    4 жыл бұрын

    I'm already busy looking at the octocat in the background!

  • @KinesVildHasse

    @KinesVildHasse

    4 жыл бұрын

    Your enthusiasm makes up for it!

  • @dahemac

    @dahemac

    4 жыл бұрын

    Tackling actively accreting black holes will play havoc with your nail finish.

  • @gustavderkits8433
    @gustavderkits84334 жыл бұрын

    You should cover the very recent discovery of a probable Seyfert event in the Milky Way about 3.2 Myr ago, by Joss Bland-Hawthorn and his team. Their analysis combines the Fermi bubbles data with the ionization of hydrogen clouds in th Magellanic stream. So we may be living in a Seyfert galaxy, which may just be a temporary condition of any galaxy. Worth your attention.

  • @KeenanTims
    @KeenanTims4 жыл бұрын

    It's pretty crazy that lasers/masers occur in nature; they require pretty contrived situations to appear on earth, and I guess they're pretty rare in the cosmos too. Super interesting, and I really love Dr Becky's enthusiasm, pretty sure she just coined a new term ;). I'd love an episode on the distance ladder and the different clever ways cosmologists have come up with to measure distances with little more than a few smudgy dots of light on a photographic plate.

  • @aerospacenews
    @aerospacenews4 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video. I always find these very interesting. Especially the parts I actually understand. ;)

  • @robinfallegger739
    @robinfallegger7394 жыл бұрын

    I love all videos with Becky !

  • @Hali_D
    @Hali_D2 жыл бұрын

    This galaxy is my favorite. Thank you for this information!

  • @Lerxster
    @Lerxster4 жыл бұрын

    Nice piece on the Today program about Mercury vs Astrology :-)

  • @zapfanzapfan
    @zapfanzapfan4 жыл бұрын

    Still have a backlog of material with Dr Becky? Sweet! Mega Masar will be a thing from now on :-)

  • @roberthanleytortora7405
    @roberthanleytortora74054 жыл бұрын

    really pulls it together there at the end VERY COOL btw nice job on event horizon

  • @MrGooglevideoviewer
    @MrGooglevideoviewer4 жыл бұрын

    Awesome video! Very interesting :)

  • @zaahidapatel1362
    @zaahidapatel13623 жыл бұрын

    thanks for the informative series of videos ...and for all the work u do @DeepSkyVideos just a curious comment ...y does @Dr.Becky use the "normal" way to calculate distance of m106 from earth ; i thought space was curved (as mr einstein said) and there must be some pretty fancy mathematical way of calculatin distances in space ........ unless.............................................................

  • @DavidThomasScorbal
    @DavidThomasScorbal4 жыл бұрын

    1:08 In this version of physics, electrons do Hohmann Transfers between energy levels. Neat.

  • @Casowsky

    @Casowsky

    2 жыл бұрын

    Jebediah Kerman up to his old antics I'm sure

  • @robnorris4770
    @robnorris47704 жыл бұрын

    I can’t draw a straight line without a scale, but from this I learned I can draw a black hole. And a clump of Maser emission looks like a smashed spider.

  • @jefflucas_life
    @jefflucas_life4 жыл бұрын

    I have to make 2nd visit, it's so sheared, smeared looking with high emissions. Very interesting to image like M63.

  • @masaharumorimoto4761
    @masaharumorimoto47614 жыл бұрын

    Wowzers!! She's sharp as a thumbtack! My brain hurts thinking about a water maser... Universal SuperSoaker.

  • @alanjs1
    @alanjs14 жыл бұрын

    Yet another great video. Here's an idea for a video. The nebula flyby in the video got me thinking, how bright would a nebula be if you was really close? The clip on the video gave the impression it would be really bright, but how bright would say the Orion nebula be if we were say less than a light year away, or even just a few AU? I was always under the assumption that as they were so massive, the luminance per area is actually low. Would love to hear your charming explanation!

  • @BaronSamedi1959

    @BaronSamedi1959

    4 жыл бұрын

    They maybe massive but are also rather big so the density will be rather low, *I think*. SO when you get quite close the brightness will be low as you will be seeing the darkness of space through the glowing gas.

  • @alanjs1

    @alanjs1

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@BaronSamedi1959 That's what I think aswell. Would be nice to get the Doc's opinion on it tho!!

  • @pierreabbat6157
    @pierreabbat61574 жыл бұрын

    AMAZING MASAR

  • @mikeclarke952
    @mikeclarke9524 жыл бұрын

    Mega Maser Quasar = MEMAQ Pronounced, "me mak". Used in a sentence: "Holy cow look at that memaq emission"!

  • @vieuxnez
    @vieuxnez4 жыл бұрын

    Love the high tech laptop stand! ;)

  • @bobknip

    @bobknip

    3 жыл бұрын

    Considering the contents of that laptop stand, describing it as "high-tech" is probably accurate. :-)

  • @thechrisgrice
    @thechrisgrice4 жыл бұрын

    Wait... she said that the distance to the Mega Masar was 25 light years. Surely that can't be correct?

  • @manfredpseudowengorz

    @manfredpseudowengorz

    4 жыл бұрын

    Missing "millions". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_106

  • @oliverberard
    @oliverberard3 жыл бұрын

    Really appreciate teaching skills here - good teachers take complex ideas and explain them in ways the layman can understand [sort of :-)]

  • @UpcycleElectronics
    @UpcycleElectronics4 жыл бұрын

    Very cool. I keep imagining a version of Spaceballs in some bubble universe has a mega maser. ..."Aaaaim de laaayzzaar.... FHIGHAR DE MEGAA MAAZAAHRRR!!!"

  • @tribananas
    @tribananas4 жыл бұрын

    Very cool.

  • @ITFAE
    @ITFAE4 жыл бұрын

    love her enthusiasm

  • @MrKago1
    @MrKago14 жыл бұрын

    So are we seeing just the glowing accretion disk or are we seeing the jets pointing at us or both? also does this mean the mega maser light is highly polarized like in lasers?

  • @chilllytube
    @chilllytube2 жыл бұрын

    Does the gas heat up by friction, or just the pressure?

  • @bobknip
    @bobknip3 жыл бұрын

    8:49 Dr. Becky's nice eye.

  • @SquaredSmith
    @SquaredSmith4 жыл бұрын

    I hope that Dr Becky is having a good day.

  • @ericsbuds
    @ericsbuds4 жыл бұрын

  • @epsyuma
    @epsyuma2 жыл бұрын

    22 to 25 light-years away? That can't be or we would all be toast.

  • @fazergazer
    @fazergazer4 жыл бұрын

    Cosmologists often leave out the mega or million when talking with each other.

  • @jamesdriscoll9405
    @jamesdriscoll94054 жыл бұрын

    Had to re - ring the bell. wth YT?

  • @dknabeel
    @dknabeel4 жыл бұрын

    Dr Becky is back :D

  • @AstroRamiEmad
    @AstroRamiEmad4 жыл бұрын

    9:30 is the distance 20 to 25 ly??? That sounds like inside our own Galaxy. Did you mean 25 million ly? Or are we talking about the distance between that blob and the black hole?

  • @winnieg100
    @winnieg1004 жыл бұрын

    How is the graph made?

  • @Veptis
    @Veptis4 жыл бұрын

    we get the office video on a different channel?

  • @rhoddryice5412

    @rhoddryice5412

    4 жыл бұрын

    Bradys channels are well worth watching.

  • @Grumman_HellCat_F6F
    @Grumman_HellCat_F6F4 жыл бұрын

    New DSV, thank you!!! Now ignitine the Mega-Maser-Quasar-Blaster, and the world is ours!

  • @Banzaj33
    @Banzaj334 жыл бұрын

    I share your love for this galaxy. I even have it tattooed on me 😊

  • @SeminarChauffeur
    @SeminarChauffeur2 жыл бұрын

    Does it have any satellite galaxies?

  • @GoFyouSelfGrandma
    @GoFyouSelfGrandma4 жыл бұрын

    Have any blue nugget galaxies discovered so far have massive galactic central black holes?

  • @Ben_the_Ignorant
    @Ben_the_Ignorant4 жыл бұрын

    I saw that galaxy it with a 10x50 binocular but it takes a very dark night.

  • @ChristopherSprance
    @ChristopherSprance4 жыл бұрын

    Sweet octocat mini

  • @line_noise
    @line_noise4 жыл бұрын

    That's the tidiest scientist's office I've ever seen! Where are the piles of journal extracts dating back to 1973?

  • @eyykendrick

    @eyykendrick

    4 жыл бұрын

    Line Noise right

  • @DrBecky

    @DrBecky

    4 жыл бұрын

    😂 I’m a neat freak. Also - pixels not paper!

  • @eyykendrick

    @eyykendrick

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@DrBecky I LOVE YOU!!! Honestly your genuine wholeheartedness motivates me to be more enthusiastic when I interact with people throughout the day. Your happiness is infectious and I hope to be the same way.

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie95514 жыл бұрын

    Who says "QM says"...?, Why? What? How does it "say" outside of the Anthropic Principle? (String Theory Mathematics) This is the next posit of harmonic resonance-> coherent interference radiation in sequence since Vera Rubin's "Dinner Plate" galaxy rotation observation. Interesting and an illustration of the Conformal Fields=> i-reflection/black-hole Modulation Mechanism of probabilities in potential possibilities QM-TIMESPACE, e-Pi-i interference Principle.

  • @JohnDoe-vq8bg
    @JohnDoe-vq8bg4 жыл бұрын

    The KZread cor-rector's do love you Dr Becky! Best regards!

  • @Hailfire08
    @Hailfire084 жыл бұрын

    Can we just make masar an official term?

  • @bogey19018
    @bogey19018 Жыл бұрын

    Is there any life on this M106 galaxy?

  • @luckypillgrim1913
    @luckypillgrim19134 жыл бұрын

    I find the answer why discoveries are going so slow :( they are done on Mac's

  • @rokpape8214
    @rokpape82143 жыл бұрын

    You are my favourite...

  • @jimmyshrimbe9361
    @jimmyshrimbe93614 жыл бұрын

    Oh my frack!! My notifications are turned off for this channel and I DEFINITELY didn't have it set that way. What the eff?

  • @Axonteer

    @Axonteer

    4 жыл бұрын

    you still have it in your feed so just dont sub to 20000 chans and youll be fine

  • @DeepSkyVideos

    @DeepSkyVideos

    4 жыл бұрын

    Get that fixed!

  • @jimmyshrimbe9361

    @jimmyshrimbe9361

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Axonteer yeah, thanks. It's more of a "why did that happen" comment, though.

  • @jimmyshrimbe9361

    @jimmyshrimbe9361

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@DeepSkyVideos you better believe I fixed it immediately!

  • @manfredpseudowengorz

    @manfredpseudowengorz

    4 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for a reminder.

  • @str1xt
    @str1xt4 жыл бұрын

    Columated mega masers, yes I said to myself, that's what I was thinking .

  • @n1k0n_
    @n1k0n_2 жыл бұрын

    Gaser?

  • @gert-janbraas7516
    @gert-janbraas75164 жыл бұрын

    @5:46 a photon has exited an electron to go to a higher band, and then a second photon 'stimulates it down', emitting one(?) photon? What am i missing here?

  • @leftaroundabout

    @leftaroundabout

    4 жыл бұрын

    You've basically got it right. The weird-seeming thing here is the “stimulating it down” part, but actually this shouldn't be too surprising: all the emission / radiation processes are reversible, so coupling to a down-transition is in principle just as well possible as to an up-transition. The reason we don't usually notice that as much is that in most situations, there are far more electrons in the low-energy state than in the high-energy one, so up-stimulation has simply much more opportunity than stimulated emission. The few instances where that does happens normally go unnoticed because the emitted radiation is indistinguishable from the stimulating one. That's very different in a laser/maser though, the crucial thing being the population inversion: there are more electrons in the _high_ energy state, thus you actually get more energy out after the stimulation and that's the light/microwave _amplification_ mechanism. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_inversion

  • @gert-janbraas7516

    @gert-janbraas7516

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@leftaroundabout Aha. Thanx. From that wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stimulated_Emission.svg

  • @kaylaandjimbryant8258
    @kaylaandjimbryant82584 жыл бұрын

    @9:52 oops. 22-25 LY away would put it inside the milky way.

  • @ScottLahteine
    @ScottLahteine4 жыл бұрын

    In my universe M106 sets the fan speed.

  • @maynardjohnson3313
    @maynardjohnson33134 жыл бұрын

    That's what I've always said, things like Gamma Ray Bursters, things that blast high energy photons anisotropicly across space distantly especially are kind of naturally occurring lasers. The jets of ionized matter acreating into things like black holes form a population inversion preferentially in a particular direction or vector and through super-radiance, single pass laser gain without a fabry perot cavity, these structures preferentially blast out energy at higher than expected levels due to stimulated emission along the jet axis. I've also wondered that if one set up an actual resonant cavity with gallium arsenide, zinc selenide or first surface gold mirrors on a suitable substrate in the atmosphere of Mars, would you get a CO2 laser beam at 10.6 microns? We had a naturally occurring, water moderated, nuke reactor in Africa. Why not naturally occurring lasers? Maybe not freakin' sharks with freakin' laser beams on their heads but what about Gamma Ray Bursters? I'm not sayin' anything, just sayin'.

  • @ricardoalves3475
    @ricardoalves34754 жыл бұрын

    IT'S INSIDE OUR GALAXY!!! RUN AWAY!!! RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!

  • @janeclark1881
    @janeclark18815 ай бұрын

    22-25 Mly is not ±3%. It's nearer ±8%

  • @d4v0r_x
    @d4v0r_x Жыл бұрын

    mega maser quasar laser phaser goes brrr

  • @TexanRanger321
    @TexanRanger3214 жыл бұрын

    Could fast radio burst be the equivalent of the x Ray maser, by polar reversal of the singularity ?

  • @bruinflight1
    @bruinflight13 жыл бұрын

    "Quantum mechanics says..." LOL

  • @ibizenco
    @ibizenco4 жыл бұрын

    Is the universe not FASCINATING?

  • @arasharfa
    @arasharfa4 жыл бұрын

    This is what KZread is for

  • @q23main
    @q23main4 жыл бұрын

    Darth Vader wanted me to ask, can you put that technology on a "moon"? 😉

  • @thomasp2572
    @thomasp25724 жыл бұрын

    in 5:40 both photons should leave the vicinity of the atom.... the way it is now, it looks like that the stimulating photon is being absorbed, which is not right

  • @peteshea155
    @peteshea1554 жыл бұрын

    Aristarchus is the singular Earthbound source to all skylights. but you are a doctor so the Earth can't be flat and stationary and all the reflected skylights can't be local reflections off of a contoured watery mirrorlike barrier. carry on.

  • @billschlafly4107
    @billschlafly41074 жыл бұрын

    I love how passionate she is.

  • @Smonserratm
    @Smonserratm4 жыл бұрын

    Masers were invented before lasers.

  • @sirkowski
    @sirkowski4 жыл бұрын

    Megazord

  • @MegaPhester
    @MegaPhester4 жыл бұрын

    Am I the only person terrified by massive clouds in space shooting microwave lasers? What would happen if an inhabited star system passed through the beam? I imagine the distances are big enough that this scenario is very unlikely but imagine a whole planet being boiled or sterilized by a huge beam randomly sweeping through the neighbourhood...

  • @RedStefan

    @RedStefan

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yeah pretty sure quasars are not habitable

  • @sujimtangerines

    @sujimtangerines

    4 жыл бұрын

    Me, thinking about gamma ray bursts.

  • @ianbaird6113
    @ianbaird61134 жыл бұрын

    Halton Arp Seyfert Galaxy, what did he find? Seeing RED? Why would a astronomer get banned for trying to publish his observations? Science after all is questioning the Narrative even if it means you get Blacklisted! Why is that?

  • @sulijoo
    @sulijoo4 жыл бұрын

    The universe is a grand menagerie, filled with animals we can barely imagine.

  • @mjb9455
    @mjb94554 жыл бұрын

    what if red shift measurement is wrong? Maybe the universe is not expanding.

  • @virkez010

    @virkez010

    4 жыл бұрын

    What if the measured evidence I have of your making of this comment is wrong? Maybe you never made this comment.

  • @Axonteer
    @Axonteer4 жыл бұрын

    Ill bet her dotted dress was chosen because of deep sky videos and it sort of imitates the night sky ;-)

  • @alnilam2151
    @alnilam21512 жыл бұрын

    Pesky ould critterz those interfering antiferometerz; al ways cloud prognosiable aspects in shadow like a drought oasis that was a dream within a dream? 'T was a Mirage al' de time! No joke ;

  • @TraitorVek
    @TraitorVek4 жыл бұрын

    H2

  • @yuotwob3091
    @yuotwob30914 жыл бұрын

    23-25 light years ^ - 3 away , so, on the page

  • @brettmoore3194
    @brettmoore31944 жыл бұрын

    How can yous say that is a real image?

  • @will2see
    @will2see4 жыл бұрын

    @ 9:54 - "22 to 25 ly away" - MILLIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG, you didn't notice that when you edited the video??????

  • @MrUpphew
    @MrUpphew4 жыл бұрын

    Dr B trying to find D

  • @brianpetkovic4579
    @brianpetkovic45794 жыл бұрын

    l u .

  • @pvhufpvhuf3751
    @pvhufpvhuf37514 жыл бұрын

    Wrong pronunciation of Seyfert.

  • @BaronSamedi1959
    @BaronSamedi19594 жыл бұрын

    You're accidentally touching an interesting issue: How does it come that maths are so incredibly good at describing our universe? Your comment of course is still totally insane of course.

  • @deathsheadknight2137
    @deathsheadknight21374 жыл бұрын

    does anyone else like notice the oddness of a British scientist using a manner of speech reminiscent of like, California valley girls?

  • @Modenut
    @Modenut4 жыл бұрын

    Rule #276 of The Patriarchy *clearly* states that women are not allowed to know space...things. (no, I was not actually serious)

  • @pottierkurt1702
    @pottierkurt17024 жыл бұрын

    Doesn't the university own a tripod 4 that camera. The filming of this made me carsick.

  • @leftpastsaturn67
    @leftpastsaturn674 жыл бұрын

    You know you've been single for too long when an attractive doctor talking about collimation makes you a little weak at the knees.

  • @Mr.Unacceptable
    @Mr.Unacceptable4 жыл бұрын

    Beckey's dimples are just so distracting.

  • @danfg7215

    @danfg7215

    4 жыл бұрын

    Solder Joe Who’s Becky? I only see dimples

  • @lovewind2009
    @lovewind20093 жыл бұрын

    Allah understands our prayers even when we can’t find the words to say Them.

  • @bjorkstrand7773
    @bjorkstrand77732 жыл бұрын

    rubbish

  • @ashwinvishwakarma2531
    @ashwinvishwakarma25314 жыл бұрын

    omg chipped nails i cant watch anymore, unsubbed

  • @wesleycameron1034
    @wesleycameron10344 жыл бұрын

    This is all bad science

Келесі