I love that it is a persons voice, not one of those impersonal computer voices ❤️

@ordyhorizonrivieredunord712

Ай бұрын

Too bad we can't hear the voices of all these skelletons... Who knows what they could talk about? 🐺🌕

@kathleenmartin7498

Ай бұрын

And those AI voices always mispronounce words.

@caniceedward

Ай бұрын

Your prediction could be wrong in the they look.

@TheBigdaddy64

Ай бұрын

I actually share dna with Rathlin man and Ballynahatty woman.

@brucegoodall3794

Ай бұрын

​@kathleenmartin7498 Sssshhh. 😊 Don't tip them off. They are learning from us. They are trying to replace us. When we can't recognize them from our fellow humans, our days are numbered...😮

Finally, a documentary not made by Chat GPT and Mr. Roboto. Bravo!

I am not sure what they ment by saying that the genetical combination of blue eyes and dark hair doesn't exist anymore. I have seen people like these including my mother. It is relatively common in Eastern Europe, Turkey and some areas of Asia. The guy they show as an example of the first people crossing to Ireland has blue lenses put. No need for that. We are still alive.

@kaylynhewell8046

Ай бұрын

Yes. Adoptee here... I am very dark olive skin especially in summer (I have been asked if I am part something else besides Caucasian my whole life). Brown hair that has a red tint in the summer because of the sun and have bright green (blue if im crying) eyes. Pretty sure I exist. Also if you have never met anyone from the lavant area then surely you have seen the famous picture of the girl from Afghanistan with green eyes on the cover of National Geographic Magazine from the 90's. It's one of the most stunning photos ever taken in my opinion.

@brendajoycewhite5747

Ай бұрын

My Dad had blue eyes and dark hair, he looked like a movie star. According to my friends.

@jeanbrown8295

Ай бұрын

My father had dark hair ,blue eyes and fair skin,nothing unusual,lots of people have that colouring

@michelleconley7124

Ай бұрын

Look up the cheddar man reconstruction. When they meant dark skin, they meant very dark skin (not like the actor). Which is a very rare trait and is a deviation from the whole group, not representative of an entire group of people which is found nowhere in the world at this point

@Pillarguri

Ай бұрын

Yes thats wrong too. Most Norwehians look like that brown hair and blue,green eyes. The blond is more in Sweden

DNA is less an instruction manual and more a simple ingredient list. The great wonder is how those ingredients interact; differently in different locations

Age 40-60 and 5ft 11 inches. So people did live past 35 and could be tall. Why would anyone think that people groups didn't move around or migrate? IMO people are people no matter the time period. Same requirements, same desires, same feelings. Just different environments and customs but still people.

@tresawilkins7159

Ай бұрын

Modern arrogance... people like to think we in the current time are somehow superior. Hogwash!

@tomjackson4374

15 күн бұрын

@@tresawilkins7159 Take away all the modern crutches that we have become dependent on and the average modern would die within a week.

@hunmari

3 күн бұрын

ancient times people couldn't migrate, because of resources, and most countries has their own native citizens. Even the native Americans didn't mix with another Indian tribes. Later the rulers married to other country's ruler for political reasons

Dr. Lara Cassidy is one of the best presenters of an informative documentary I've seen yet. Great episode all around.

@PetroicaRodinogaster264

Ай бұрын

she looks like she is maybe 16 yrs old. I bet she would have to fight hard to be taken seriously by misogynists.

@fedupwitumboth

Ай бұрын

Fascinating documentary….love it!

@thefarmgirl30

Күн бұрын

She comes across as a little immature in her attire and laptop decals for me to take her too seriously. Most professionals don't decorate their work-laptop.

I am black american, and took my dna test. It shows 34%Nigeria and surprising 6%Norway

@ElizabethMBoyd

Ай бұрын

We Americans tend to be very mixed most back Americans have 30% or more European

@elizabethanitahamzi-schmid896

25 күн бұрын

How incredible! The Norse were great seafarers though, so not surprising they may have reached West Africa!

@deborahgale

21 күн бұрын

Why surprising?

@WalterWagner001

20 күн бұрын

and the other 60%?

@lskazalski

14 күн бұрын

​@@elizabethanitahamzi-schmid896 More likely that the norse ancestry is via England and the USA

Strikes me that a fetal position might allow for the deepest hole with the least effort.

@lilmike2710

Ай бұрын

Sometimes they tend to overthink things. And spend way too much time discussing it, until it winds up being a debate. Once that happens it's clear that more research is needed before any conclusion can be reached.

@jerrylong381

Ай бұрын

That makes sense, if you were trying to minimize the effort to bury someone. The elaborate tombs containing those bodies in the fetal position tell an entirely different story though. Great effort was expended laying them to rest in tombs lined in large stones, capped with large stones. Certainly there were others that the fetal position may have saved effort, but not the one's shown.

@michaelbray109

Ай бұрын

@@lilmike2710always…that is how it rolls. The only problem occurs when some take supposition to be fact. Science is always open ended…or should be.

@zipperpillow

Ай бұрын

That would be standing up.

@zipperpillow

Ай бұрын

Seeing as it was in Ireland, the dude was probably drunk and curled up under a rock to sleep it off, but never woke up again. They should check to see if he pissed himself.

Tara. And Egyptian Princess in Ireland. These are the stories I grew with.

For anyone who wants to go into the detail of the information presented in this program, I highly recommend the channel "survive the jive". He is a historian who visits all kinds of sites with megaliths and dives deeply into the DNA details to explain the origins, movements and culture of the people of this period and is a great filmmaker.

@allisonshaw9341

Ай бұрын

Yeah, his programs on Native Americans are pretty much rubbish.

@tommydeamon7657

Ай бұрын

I'll check it out thank you survive the jive sound interesting and entertaining

@gracecolgan9519

Ай бұрын

Try Robert Sepehr ​@@allisonshaw9341

@gracecolgan9519

Ай бұрын

​@@tommydeamon7657Robert Sepehr

@jackiemack8653

17 күн бұрын

​@@allisonshaw9341Why because the truth can't be accepted?

genetic studies are a favorite subject of mine, I do enjoy all of the research on-going as well as the information gained in regards to the study of our ancient human past. I have been tested twice, once 20 years or so ago and another a few short years ago, am quite proud of the fact my Y Haplogroup, being of the G2a type, is from the early farmer folk of Neolithic age. The migrations of these peoples went two routes, one along the sea etc. and the other into Europe via the Danube to Rhine etc.

"they looked like modern Sardinians" and proceeds to show video footage re-enactment of not Sardinians lol. Looked like Arabs or Egyptian people. I wonder if anyone knows who those actors were? And why would they do that? accidentally/ incidentally/ coincidentally no doubt.

@twilajohnson2313

Ай бұрын

Not likely. The gene for skin that white only occurred about 6000 years ago. But yeah, they probably would’ve looked a lot like the real Egyptian people just saying🤷🏾‍♀️

@xhorxheetxeberria-td1hu

Ай бұрын

Sardinians are Mediterranean.

@irishrepub84

Ай бұрын

@@twilajohnson2313 lol no. by real i can only assume you are hoping to conflate certain subsaharan West African Bantu peoples with Egyptians. which is utterly ridiculous. but have at it. at least you wont be alone.

@irishrepub84

Ай бұрын

@@xhorxheetxeberria-td1hu and? i know youre not implying you cant tell the difference between anyone around the Med lol? isnt that a lil waysiss? but of course you are. very typical

@dinarusso3320

Ай бұрын

Even in our modern time, Sardinians come in Olive skinned/ dark hair AND fair with light hair and light eyes.

Roughly 10:00 they're confusing migration and trade...

@zipperpillow

Ай бұрын

There's a lot of confusion here. They keep emphasizing DNA, but they never specify which DNA. R1a, R1b? What? Useless pablum.

@Donnah1979

Ай бұрын

In order to trade, someone would need to travel, so it's not unrelated.

There are different types of "white" skin. The type typical in continental Europe will tan in the sun, whereas the type in North West Europe does not tan (even when they live in Australia, such as myself). Those populations with the highest proportion of Western Hunter gatherer today (Ireland, Scotland, parts of Scandinavia and Estonia) have the highest proportion of non tanning white skin. The repeated assertion that Western hunter gatherers were dark (some assert black) is a myth. The evidence of their living decedents is that they may very well have been the origin of the non tanning white skin type. There is a paper: "Global skin colour prediction from DNA, Hum Genet (2017) 136:847-863" shows how complex the issue is, and, given how fragmentary the ancient DNA is, the assertion of their skin complexion from DNA is political hogwash.

@suwedi1

28 күн бұрын

You absolutely don't understand what you're talking about and the "scientist" in this docs are in great part responsible for that. A lot of comments here are wrong and misleading. To simplify, Every human has a particular gene who's for the most part is responsible for skin color. The difference between black people and other "races" of people, is that they possess the original version of this gene when all other people have a mutated version of the same gene. Yes, today, every person with light skin (Europeans and Asians) has the mutated version of that gene. On the other hand, every dark skinned people (in Africa, Asia, Australia, or anywhere else) possess the unmutated version of that same gene. The unmutated version of that gene is dominant over the mutated one which is recessive. Exactly like brown eyes are dominant over any other eye color who are in fact, mutated version of the brown one. That the whole point of the principle of gene dominance and gene recessiveness. The recessives one are always the mutated version of the dominants unmutated one. That's the only reason scientists can say with confidence that early Europeans were dark-skinned simply because they all had the same original dominant unmutated gene as any modern black Africans or any other darker-skinned people around the world TODAY! Absolutely nobody in modern Europe or Asia with white skin possess that skin color gene unmutated. Simple as that! and that include arabs, mediterraneans, sardinians, etc. Many comment here keep saying they believe they are related to this dark blue eyes ancient Europeans because they can tanne during the summer. Totally irrelevent! You simply could not possibly be related to them if you possess the recessive mutated versionn of their dominant unmutated one. It's simply biologicaly IMPOSSIBLE! just stop the nonsense and the ignorence already! Also, it's people like the scientist woman in this documentary who confuse the masse by misleading declaration like saying she think this ancient Europeans looked like today Sardinians. NONSENCE! First, what are this particular physical attributes sole Sardinian possess and nobody else? Second, Sardinians like all every other modern Europeans possess the mutated gene for skin color. Sardinians are over light skinned compared to ANY modern possessor of that unmutated gene. So, what she's talking about? Also, when scientist say that dark skinned and blue eyes combination seem to be extinct doday, what they really means is that it's very rare to find in the modern world somebody with the dominant unmutated gene for skin color and the recessive mutated gene for blue eyes. That all.

@SimpleMinded221

13 күн бұрын

Political hogwash to you, yet when an obvious brown skinned pharaoh is reconstructed as white skinned its praised. Yes, old Europeans were pretty dark skinned, so what ?

@alia9087

8 күн бұрын

at last, a sensible comment

@caroljean1005

8 күн бұрын

Thank you. Its so obvious in this video that they had African actors portraying Irish. I'll make certain to block this site as I don't subscribe to this BS.

@annemurphy9339

6 күн бұрын

@@caroljean1005. No one should subscribe to the B/S presented here as it is politically inspired rather than factual.

When the ancients in northern Europe built their solar observatories, what was the climate like? How often in today's time period is the sky at the winter solstice clear enough to see sunrise and sunset? Should we expect observability to be any better thousands of years ago?

@letsdothis9063

14 күн бұрын

Yup. Not much light pollution or industrial pollution to obstruct the view. I live in a rural area. If I turn all of my lights off, I can see thousands of stars that are not visible when I'm in town.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

@@letsdothis9063 britain and other northerly nations are often quite cloudly evry day for months.

Follow the names Galathians in Anatolia, Galicians in Poland, Galos in France and Spain and Gallegos in Northwest Spain and Gales in Wales, and Gaelic in Ireland!

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

yes, we say Gauls in English ( Gaulois [goll-wa] in French language). Gallic people . Those were outposts of Hebrew people scattered in ancient times, from what i gather. Interestingly, the French R sound is rather Hebrew sounding.

Music is not needed and is extremely irritating.

Extensive dendrochronology could build a year-by-year history going back hundreds of years. Then any local archeological site with wood could be dated to a specific year rather than just a period. It would need to be done at multiple sites but when done at one point, it could be useful for a wide range where the weather conditions were roughly the same.

Fascinatuing. Very informative.

What he said was wrong about the sun being closer in summer. The earth is actually furthest away during summer, and it's the Earth's tilt that produces the seasons.

@pennylockhart9553

Ай бұрын

Get wisdom

@franceshorton918

Ай бұрын

Get the facts please

@MJIZZEL

Ай бұрын

You are 100% correct but good luck getting these idiots today to understand it. They struggle defining a woman and the others think the earth is flat.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

whose summer? the two hemispheres are different. , opposite seasons. North-south.

Totally feasible, there was a time when the north sea was much farther north, and Dogger land was a land bridge between the UK and Europe

It's fascinating to consider the lives of our ancestors. Day to day life is fascinating and then there's their epic migrations. Thanks for sharing this documentary.

The Forgotten History of western Civilisation - EXCELLENT

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

it's actually Prehistory not history though. "History" means it was written.

Isn’t it fantastic that we’re learning so much from DNA! And the computers will reveal all truths, such as, God wants us to destroy capitalism, the wage, and say all people own all things. Acts 2:44. And it’s so obvious, because one farmer can’t own his own farm, perhaps thousands of acres, because he can’t do everything by himself. He needs many helpers, and they should work part time, not for a wage (Haggai 1:6). Because there will be equal wealth worldwide someday so no one is left to starve, because capitalists think it’s right to give all the money to a few rich people, who don’t work! Now that most money is just numbers in computers we can eliminate it for perfect equality. Then all nations will start building only Tower cities connected to maglev Trains, with vertical indoor gardens, and less work (no more curse). And that’s what “all people shall know him (God) means. Jeremiah 31:34 and others.

@harrietharlow9929

Ай бұрын

It really is. I'm constantly surprised by how much we are learning about ancient peoples and migrations.

@jackiemack8653

17 күн бұрын

Jesus said everything hidden will be revealed.

@jackiemack8653

17 күн бұрын

​@@harrietharlow9929Yeshua said everything hidden will be revealed

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

you are a bit off on Bible verse meanings. but it ' s not bad to live on collective farms if people want to. Sharin g is caring. We used to have large extended families and family farms. it's a good idea. But G od must be with us in order to think correctly about it.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

If we get land and plant lots of huge food forests, it will be much better than tilling the soil.

i remember the legends of scotland being settled by scythians. scythia was on the pontic steppe.....

@bethbartlett5692

Ай бұрын

That's validated for Scotland

@YamiKisara

Ай бұрын

Scythians are the ancestors of all European nations, so yes, that checks out, but isn't particularly special.

@rahannneon

Ай бұрын

@@YamiKisara , you took the trouble to post, just to cut someone down, without adding any content at all? why? this was a reference to vindication of legend, not a vehicle for your narcissism.

@GizellaGobbi

Ай бұрын

@@rahannneon Eurázsiai hunok keleti és nyugati hunok Atilla idején a csendes óceántól az Atlantiig tartott a birodalma! Skyta királyként aposztrofálta Mátyást is a PÁPA!

@MJIZZEL

Ай бұрын

Scotia

I’ll never understand the need to make Europeans not White, she literally says they were basically Sardinians who are basically White, yet who do they show in the video? Non Whites. It’s so exhausting.

@ritasjourney

Ай бұрын

Some would like to erase us completely.

@gundisaluusmenendiz

Ай бұрын

Well... you might of answered your own question, what do you mean by... Sardinians who are "basically" white? That's the problem with you people who think they have solely ancestral Northern European ancestry. because if you don't look like Wayne Rooney, with his pale skin, stocky build, round skull and protruding ears, you aren't really "white". Is Wayne Rooney "Caucasian" or "white"? I would question Rooney's "Caucasian" actually, in comparison to a "Sardinian" who is a true "Caucasian". Caucasians are gracile not robust, natural build, small faces, etc... Everything and everyone in Northern Europe came from Southern Europe, except for the last migration into Northern Europe from Central Asia, so I have no idea why Northern Europeans feel so much different then Southern Europeans. right now my arms are dark and my feet are paler then I bet you, but you will still look at me different wouldn't you, just like the people you questioned on the video. I carry skin tone genes related to Neolithic people and I'm not at all naturally dark at all, I tan really good but not naturally dark, so this is a false claim and interpretation of ancient people's skin tone, but again.... because if I don't have the same skin tone genes as Northern Europeans, I am speculated to be "dark" and that's pseudo bias science at its core.

@irsinium

Ай бұрын

@@gundisaluusmenendiz it is about predominantely, not about solely. arian race doesnt exist, yet, Europeans are simply whites.

@PrinceBenJudah

Ай бұрын

They carried l2/l3 bro

@gundisaluusmenendiz

Ай бұрын

@@PrinceBenJudah Yes, the oldest European Hunter Gathers belonged to Ydna C1a, later I2's appeared, but not one Hunter Gather I2 survived they were all dead ends, today's I2a's all came from Southern Europe and if I'm not wrong, the oldest I2a SNP comes from Sardinia, the people the original poster of this thread said Sardinians are "basically" white. I2a people became light skinned by admixing with incoming Farmers from Anatolia who Sardinians are their closest relatives in Europe!

Awesome, Thanks

And just how did these ancient peoples lift up the Huge upper rock slabs to lay them on top of the others to make these burial dolmens? Especially if they lived in small family groups. Thanks

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

Giants. Nephilim.

Dark hair and blue eyes absolutely still exist in abundance 😯🤥 My husband has dark hair and blue eyes as do my sister, my step dad and his late mother, his brothers, and a ton of people around town.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

yes of course, and also tannable skin which is what they were not saying correctly.

_"...the Huns, or the Mongols..."_ That's daft. They were the Indo-Europeans! Huns and Mongols were partially descended from much later, East Asian peoples. They were still in eastern Asia in the Bronze Age, and the earliest of them to make it to the Russian Steppes were 2000 years after this man lived in Ireland. There is probably a 4000-5000 year difference in when they emigrated from the steppes, westward into Europe.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

the scythians came before any mongols or huns too. steppe people, caucasian. many blonde, horse riders. Their art is almost identical to Nordic and Celtic , like the illuminated manuscripts. Great artistic gold workers and metal workers.

Height and physical size are not strictly determined by genes. Environmental factors also play a role. People who have more and better food tend to be taller and larger than people who experience hunger. Americans today, on average, are much bigger than Americans of 70 years ago were. Another example is the movie set for Cameron's Titanic. The set for the grand staircase had to be made bigger than the original in order for today's people to walk down it side-by-side.

@lindaolsen7828

Ай бұрын

I didn't know that! (about the staircase).

@EdwardSteiner-ez4hy

Ай бұрын

That is a half truth. Genes are always in control, all else being equal. Thee reason the Norwegians are much taller than the Pygmies is genetics, not environmental.

@kaylynhewell8046

Ай бұрын

​@@EdwardSteiner-ez4hy Thank you. I don't understand people's brains sometimes. Two things can be true at the same time. It's like logic is lost on most.

@tommydeamon7657

Ай бұрын

Yep lack of nutrition and proper exercise will stunt anything d.n.a might have gave you

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

yes indeed. a malnourished kid can lose 6 or 8 inches of height.

Great vid!!!! But whats with all the racingcar sounds?

My daughter-in-law had black hair and blue eyes. I have a friend with black hair and green eyes. But we live in the USA. My genetic European matches are closer to the archaic DNA in Europe and not the current European population.

Considering that ocean levels were far lower during the ice ages, and that in addition, Doggerland between northern France and eastern Britain was above sea level and most certainly allowed for migration of peoples, and that there was a quite a bit of dry land between Britain and Ireland, I'd say it entirely possible that not everyone migrated by boat. We may never know how many different groups have lived on these island nations, but the Celts weren't the first ones there although they have been the most prominent and the Gaels, Cymraeg (Welsh), Manx, and Cornish are still living there despite every effort of the English to exterminate or forcibly assimilate them. Be they the Dawn or Beaker peoples, I'd like to know more about those first people to set foot on Britain and Ireland.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

yeah maybe they rode mini mammoths. jk

My grandpa who is Norwegian, English and German had dark brown skin and blue eyes.

@YamiKisara

Ай бұрын

Well yeah, us Europeans tend to get really tanned if we spend a lot of time outside.

@antonpressing

Ай бұрын

There is no such thing as a German - my little sister goes for an Italian, my older sister has red hair and freckels (but my mother never went to Scottland) - and I never turn brown, just red ! We are EUROPEANS !!!

@antonpressing

Ай бұрын

​@@YamiKisaraI do'nt - I turn RED !

@dingusdingus2152

Ай бұрын

@DustinHakonson he is probably one of those smoked Norwegians, kept in the curing shed for a few days...

@MelissaR784

Ай бұрын

​@@YamiKisaraAlways been told it's the black Irish in me why I tan so well.

EXCELLENT !!! EXCELLENT !!!! A very informative and well done vid. THANK YOU

My father and I both have blue eyes and dark hair. My mom had green eyes and dark hair. I don’t know where you looked but we are out here.

@suwedi1

28 күн бұрын

No, you're not. You absolutely don't understand what you're talking about and the "scientist" in this docs are in great part responsible for that. A lot of comments here are wrong and misleading. To simplify, Every human has a particular gene who's for the most part is responsible for skin color. The difference between black people and other "races" of people, is that they possess the original version of this gene when all other people have a mutated version of the same gene. Yes, today, every person with light skin (Europeans and Asians) has the mutated version of that gene. On the other hand, every dark skinned people (in Africa, Asia, Australia, or anywhere else) possess the unmutated version of that same gene. The unmutated version of that gene is dominant over the mutated one which is recessive. Exactly like brown eyes are dominant over any other eye color who are in fact, mutated version of the brown one. That the whole point of the principle of gene dominance and gene recessiveness. The recessives one are always the mutated version of the dominants unmutated one. That's the only reason scientists can say with confidence that early Europeans were dark-skinned simply because they all had the same original dominant unmutated gene as any modern black Africans or any other darker-skinned people around the world TODAY! Absolutely nobody in modern Europe or Asia with white skin possess that skin color gene unmutated. Simple as that! and that include arabs, mediterraneans, sardinians, etc. Many comment here keep saying they believe they are related to this dark blue eyes ancient Europeans because they can tanne during the summer. Totally irrelevent! You simply could not possibly be related to them if you possess the recessive mutated versionn of their dominant unmutated one. It's simply biologicaly IMPOSSIBLE! just stop the nonsense and the ignorence already! Also, it's people like the scientist woman in this documentary who confuse the masse by misleading declaration like saying she think this ancient Europeans looked like today Sardinians. NONSENCE! First, what are this particular physical attributes sole Sardinian possess and nobody else? Second, Sardinians like all every other modern Europeans possess the mutated gene for skin color. Sardinians are over light skinned compared to ANY modern possessor of that unmutated gene. So, what she's talking about? Also, when scientist say that dark skinned and blue eyes combination seem to be extinct doday, what they really means is that it's very rare to find in the modern world somebody with the dominant unmutated gene for skin color and the recessive mutated gene for blue eyes. That all.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

Lots of us. and i tan dark if i get enough sun.

All Britts, Keltts, Celtts, Pictts, Vikings, Scotts and Irish came directly from Noahs grandson Javan through his son Kittim. Kittim began on the Isle of Cyprus where ships were being built to sail all the European Isles from Wood cut from Lebanon it's eastern neighbor. Incidentally in Lebanon it is written that the "Tree's of Mamre" in Lebanon were the largest trees on the Earth at that time. These massive trees were later used to build the Baalbek Temple by the Romans until none were left.

@bethbartlett5692

10 күн бұрын

But the Basque are the Irish origin, and the Phoenicians are Basque and Danites., We aren't Germanics. .

i have genetic connections to one of the burials on Rathlin Island.

@DorchesterMom

Ай бұрын

I match Rathlin 1 and 2 (but not Ballynahatty woman) on several 4cm segments ❤️

@harrietharlow9929

Ай бұрын

@@DorchesterMom I match both, but the signal from Ballynahatty and Rathlin 1 are really a strong signal across all the chromosomes (hope that makes sense, not just markers scattered here and there.

@rahannneon

Ай бұрын

@@DorchesterMom , I match Rathlin 1 and Ballynahatty.

@cynthiaarrowsmith5709

Ай бұрын

I got mostly Viking connections on mine. But what I’ve found on my ancestry is mostly from Scotland. 🤷🏼‍♀️

@robertolang9684

Ай бұрын

most of Europeans do

It really cracks me up every time I hear in these types of videos about what structures are for. Reminds me of when Robin Williams did his bit about the origins of Golf. lol I know look the sun comes up right here at the end of winter let’s spend years and years moving huge stones and place them in a way we can see it rise exactly and have a big party with lots of beer popcorn and women! Ugh ugh! Really gentleman it’s okay to say ya don’t know. 🌊❤️

@Demane69

24 күн бұрын

Oh, so the repeated use of such practices around the world, especially for early agricultural cultures, and the preponderance of archaeological studies means nothing? But of course, your theories based entirely on conjecture is the truth. The scientific method is dead! You heard it here 1st folks, directly from the mouth of David!

Really Egyptian beliefs might be a distant possibility. A Father raping his daughter (perhaps just before her marriage, or when her young husband was away, such that no one knew) is just as possible. There seems to be the supposition here that the child of incest would always be known about, but there is no reason to think that anyone would know who the father was in such a case, not even the mother.

@Donnah1979

Ай бұрын

Yeah, it could simply be a case of incest, for "no reason" other than this happening sometimes.

They were the same fenotype of the 5,700 y. o. girl from Syltholm site on Lolland, Denmark: dark hair and skin, blue eyes.

@annemurphy9339

6 күн бұрын

The dark skin part is hypothetical - just like the assertions that Cheddar man had very dark skin, which they had to recant and admit they had no way of knowing what his complexion shade actually was.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

others say tannable not dark.

I think neolithic people in Europe in general shared certain ideas that originated in the place where their ancestors came from, not Egypt but in a place between Asia Menor and Mesopotamia. You will find incredible neolithic sites also in modern France and Spain (a lot of them outstanding but not very well known by common people). What a fascinating history, how Europe changed with the waves of new populations. It has been suggested that the new populations from the Eurasian steppes brought with them the first wave of black plague so the neolithic people that populated Europe in that time were defenseless against that germ, so the people of the steppes had it easier to colonize and stamp their genes all over the place.

Content liked. Editing bah, but it gets a little better.

Fascinating, captivating depiction. Great scientific work.

Well, This theory stand to reason. Ice age, cold up north. As climate got more clement and population grew. Let's move north where there is room for us, as long as our crops can grow. It sounds very much like a Neolithic wild, wild west story. The dark-skinned/ blue eyed endidgemmus people probably succumbed to new diseases and hunger.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

indigenous

It was more than dilution of the hunter-gatherers, it was farmers. Just as we see conflict between farmers and urban peoples today with nomads, so it was in the ancient times. There were fewer peoples, so conflicts would have had more effect on the genome.

@Donnah1979

Ай бұрын

The hunter-gatheres were likely dying in droves from zoonic diseases, due to the livestock the newcomers brought with them.

@Demane69

24 күн бұрын

The hunter gatherer/farmer conflict ever never black and white. Farming rarely 'moved' into areas. Farming and husbandry natural grew when cultures settled into one area due to friendly climate conditions (recent studies prove that humans, animals and even plants adapt around each other and the shift is inevitable as long as cultures are allowed to grow). Migration into previously harsh areas caused cultural conflict, but also the original people turned to permanent settlements because of improving climate conditions and expanding populations. The story is as complex as anything else, and told over hundreds and even thousands of years, and can happen independently around the world.

@thomasbest8599

24 күн бұрын

Don’t forget pastoralists. Now those guys were organized

To find dark skinned blue eyed people today you need to look towards either Lapland or Australia. A lot of Australian people have mixed Indigenous & European ancestry & as our Indigenous genes are somewhat recessive the results can be quite interesting- as in people with blonde or light brown hair, darker skin tones & blue, green or grey eyes.

@suwedi1

23 күн бұрын

No. You absolutely don't understand what you're talking about and the "scientist" in this docs are in great part responsible for that. A lot of comments here are wrong and misleading. To simplify, Every human has a particular gene who's for the most part is responsible for skin color. The difference between black people and other "races" of people, is that they possess the original version of this gene when all other people have a mutated version of the same gene. Yes, today, every person with light skin (Europeans and Asians) has the mutated version of that gene. On the other hand, every dark skinned people (in Africa, Asia, Australia, or anywhere else) possess the unmutated version of that same gene. The unmutated version of that gene is dominant over the mutated one which is recessive. Exactly like brown eyes are dominant over any other eye color who are in fact, mutated version of the brown one. That the whole point of the principle of gene dominance and gene recessiveness. The recessives one are always the mutated version of the dominants unmutated one. That's the only reason scientists can say with confidence that early Europeans were dark-skinned simply because they all had the same original dominant unmutated gene as any modern black Africans or any other darker-skinned people around the world TODAY! Absolutely nobody in modern Europe or Asia with white skin possess that skin color gene unmutated. Simple as that! and that include arabs, mediterraneans, sardinians, etc. Many comment here keep saying they believe they are related to this dark blue eyes ancient Europeans because they can tanne during the summer. Totally irrelevent! You simply could not possibly be related to them if you possess the recessive mutated versionn of their dominant unmutated one. It's simply biologicaly IMPOSSIBLE! just stop the nonsense and the ignorence already! Also, it's people like the scientist woman in this documentary who confuse the masse by misleading declaration like saying she think this ancient Europeans looked like today Sardinians. NONSENCE! First, what are this particular physical attributes sole Sardinian possess and nobody else? Second, Sardinians like all every other modern Europeans possess the mutated gene for skin color. Sardinians are over light skinned compared to ANY modern possessor of that unmutated gene. So, what she's talking about? Also, when scientist say that dark skinned and blue eyes combination seem to be extinct doday, what they really means is that it's very rare to find in the modern world somebody with the dominant unmutated gene for skin color and the recessive mutated gene for blue eyes. That all.

I enjoyed this but the amount of speculation would make Graham Hancock proud.

@randomvintagefilm273

Ай бұрын

I'm shocked they didn't say we were black 2,000 years ago! 😂😂😂

@bethbartlett5692

Ай бұрын

The DNA findings are facts. They can map the migration etc. The Scientists are giving actual valid facts. The Archeologists practice a "Theory based Paradigm" (They were not correct, and going forward this will become more obvious. ) Belief and Theory does not qualify as does repeatable lab based Science = fact. Now, maybe they will return to the "Standards of Science and Research" and all can be free to think, Theorize, explore and discover. Freedom of Thought is a cornerstone requirement of Science. It supports other ideas or alternative theories. Graham merely offers another potential and he actually is applying the Standards of Science and "Research" He merely suggests that the Civilization prior to the flood was more advanced, then after the flood it was a restart. There are vast artifacts and Structures that support the idea. It is a matter of allowing the Science to validate the details. Time is revealing the facts. It is a most positive right now ... Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian

@harrietharlow9929

Ай бұрын

@@randomvintagefilm273 Because no one is saying anything remotely like that. A lot of this appears to be connected to genetic research. I'm mostly Irish/Scots/Welsh/ English yet I carry Coptic (markers). It had to have come from somewhere.

@suwedi1

28 күн бұрын

@@randomvintagefilm273 You absolutely don't understand what you're talking about and the "scientist" in this docs are in great part responsible for that. A lot of comments here are wrong and misleading. To simplify, Every human has a particular gene who's for the most part is responsible for skin color. The difference between black people and other "races" of people, is that they possess the original version of this gene when all other people have a mutated version of the same gene. Yes, today, every person with light skin (Europeans and Asians) has the mutated version of that gene. On the other hand, every dark skinned people (in Africa, Asia, Australia, or anywhere else) possess the unmutated version of that same gene. The unmutated version of that gene is dominant over the mutated one which is recessive. Exactly like brown eyes are dominant over any other eye color who are in fact, mutated version of the brown one. That the whole point of the principle of gene dominance and gene recessiveness. The recessives one are always the mutated version of the dominants unmutated one. That's the only reason scientists can say with confidence that early Europeans were dark-skinned simply because they all had the same original dominant unmutated gene as any modern black Africans or any other darker-skinned people around the world TODAY! Absolutely nobody in modern Europe or Asia with white skin possess that skin color gene unmutated. Simple as that! and that include arabs, mediterraneans, sardinians, etc. Many comment here keep saying they believe they are related to this dark blue eyes ancient Europeans because they can tanne during the summer. Totally irrelevent! You simply could not possibly be related to them if you possess the recessive mutated versionn of their dominant unmutated one. It's simply biologicaly IMPOSSIBLE! just stop the nonsense and the ignorence already! Also, it's people like the scientist woman in this documentary who confuse the masse by misleading declaration like saying she think this ancient Europeans looked like today Sardinians. NONSENCE! First, what are this particular physical attributes sole Sardinian possess and nobody else? Second, Sardinians like all every other modern Europeans possess the mutated gene for skin color. Sardinians are over light skinned compared to ANY modern possessor of that unmutated gene. So, what she's talking about? Also, when scientist say that dark skinned and blue eyes combination seem to be extinct doday, what they really means is that it's very rare to find in the modern world somebody with the dominant unmutated gene for skin color and the recessive mutated gene for blue eyes. That all.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

@@harrietharlow9929 coptic are not negroid. they are ancient egyptian.

Cool documentary 👍

That mesolithic dude is gorgeous!

Excellent documentary. The questions at the outset are, by their very nature, philosophical/ religious questions. I am not saying that science has nothing to contribute to answering these questions; quite the opposite. But the first step in keeping science useful in these endeavours, is to recognise that it can't answer every question that is worth asking. So, we might be able to figure out /how/ we came to be, but the /why/ is a completely different question, which science is not well-equipped to answer (as far as I can tell).

What a handsome archeologist at around 7:00 in

Very interesting video!! 56% Yamniah step DNA. My known ancestry is completely Northern European of Mostly Scottish and English with smaller amounts of Irish, Welsh, Norwegian, and Danish. I also had 7% Western Hunter gatherer with the remaining DNA being Anatolian Farmer folk and 3% Neanderthal.

@constancegreiner906

14 күн бұрын

Nice!

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

wow you went waaaay back. must have cost more.

Circles nature always goes in circles

Cleopatra reigned supreme? Yeah , that's another one of those "we didn think about what we're saying"

@Donnah1979

Ай бұрын

Could you elaborate, please?

@thomasbest8599

Ай бұрын

@@Donnah1979well you see Egypt took orders from the romans and while cleopatra and mark antony were reigning supreme. Augustus Caesar eliminated them both . So only a fool would say cleo reigned supreme . In other words the guy was wrong Cleo never reigned supreme. The romans put her in charge after Ptolemy the some number was eliminated himself . I don’t think he reigned supreme either .

@Demane69

24 күн бұрын

@@thomasbest8599 Correction: Her family was already ruling before the Romans recognized her rule. She was Ptolemaic, a product Hellenistic rule which was Greek Macedonian (remember Alexander the Great? This is the product of his conquests PRE-Roman). The Romans simply took it over later, as they did with everything.

@thomasbest8599

24 күн бұрын

@@Demane69 correction on your correction . I know about Alexander . My statement mentions Cleopatra because , the original poster stated Cleo reigned supreme . She did not reign supreme. Most Pharaohs did . Cleopatra did not ask Julius and Octavian

Love the narrators voice! Thank you for not being british accent! 🙏

I’ve been looking for the mediterranean DNA and here it is. I see it very strongly in my father’s side of the family.

@barbpaq

20 күн бұрын

Same in my mother's fathers side. Harvey from SW England, once kingdom of Dumnonia. Tall over 6', slender, light of foot, Mediterranean skin tone, blue eyes, strong nose like Tolkien.

@barbpaq

20 күн бұрын

Mom looked like her father's side. Straight, dark hair, blue eyes, 5'7", Mediterranean skin tone, nose like JRR Tolkien. Mom had straight white blonde hair that turned dark as she grew up. She and her brother and sister were all big boned. But her siblings looked like her mother's side, though not short. They were fair haired, blue eyed.

@barbpaq

20 күн бұрын

I did my Ancestry. They adjust results over time. I went from Caucasus to Italy/Greek area to Sardinia. Then it got absorbed into my Irish, Welsh, Pouitou French, and Quaker/ Germanic results.

@barbpaq

20 күн бұрын

Sorry to write short little bits, but KZread keeps flashing and dropping my comments before I can post. So I do a little bit at a time.

@barbpaq

20 күн бұрын

My aunt's ancestry is English and Welsh and traces into northern Norway, Sweden, around northern Finland into Russia.around the arctic circle.

thank you for explaining that lab technique. holy cow! all those acgt's!!!!

FD, can you please inform in which alphabet and language that monks' book is written?

How do you become an expert in a field of study that is based mainly on speculation?

@ellen4956

Ай бұрын

The DNA is not speculation, but the rest of the dating is by pottery and other relics. Other than that, it is speculation. They study various aspects of a place, such as pottery and anything else organic, and earthworks such as mounds and ring ditches, hill forts and use of stone, style of tools. Then they put it all together to come up with their best guess about what was going on there at the time. That's how you become an expert. They're not always right, but that's all we have to go on. Someone told me once, the way to become a "local expert" in anything is to learn more than others know locally.

@purrdiggle1470

Ай бұрын

@@ellen4956 Material culture can be documented and classified. But when it comes to things like religion and societal organization all we can do is speculate.

@jeanbrown8295

Ай бұрын

@@ellen4956 that’s what I,d like to know

@fairynuff167

Ай бұрын

Was wondering that also. Clearly she's atheist. Without the creation story her speculations are baseless and incorrect.

@bethbartlett5692

10 күн бұрын

DNA isn't speculation. Mainstream Academic is, it is a 19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline. Which they use as Fact and then Speculate... This will change soon. .

My mother and her father had dark hair but blue eyes. His mother was very Irish . My mom’s mother was very German but her folks probably had some Jewish blood and I know through genealogical record she had Choctaw Indian blood.

Great video!

The statement at 38:12 is not correct. At midwinter or early Janauary the earth is at its closest point to the sun (Perihelion). At midsummer early July the earth is at its farthest point from the sun (Aphelion)

What about the Dogger land theory?

42:50 Not really a taboo in a very small isolated group. Hell most of Europes nobility were cousins. Egyptian rulers married brother/sister or 1/2 siblings. It may be taboo now since Christianity became the dominant religion but we shouldn't put our moral standards on ancient societies like that. Genesis even has a few examples of that level of incest just because the population was so low as to be unavoidable.

The Welsh Mabinogian tells the story of Rhiannon being tricked into bearing her brothers son who grew up to be Lugh. In a matrilineal society the mans sister's children are his heirs, if you wanted an heir from your own body, you needed to enlist your sister

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

i bet that just meant they are also his equal heirs . not his only heirs.

@brendacooper5729

21 сағат бұрын

@@christigoth Under the original rules, his children by an unrelated woman were not his heirs, they were the heirs of their mothers brothers and he had no claim on them. Gwydion actually had three sons of his own, by the most messed up way you can imagine, but they were not his heirs. Rhiannon also had another child, Dylan who she managed to have murdered by another Uncle, who also would have been his heir. The logic behind it, and it still works that way in Matrilineal societies, is that you have no way of knowing if the child your wife has is related, but your sister's child definitely is. It works out well for both the woman who is equal in status with her husband, unlike the Patrilineal societies where the woman is regarded as disposable property by her family, and the children, who have multiple male influences raising them, and there is no such thing as an orphan. Prior to DNA testing the only way a man could guarantee his heir was actually his child was to essentially enslave the mother.

Some believe the "black Irish" descended from Egypt. The legend of Princess Scota.

@Demane69

24 күн бұрын

Even if true, it must be told that "black Egyptians" were post Dynastic rulers or previously Egyptian states to the south that considered themselves Egyptian after they became part of Egypt. They are not the original Dynastic rulers. Every culture diversifies over time, over extremely stressful moments of history, war, or migration, either ancient or modern (i.e. China is a collection of former native peoples now considered one people, and Japan was created from 3 cultures merging into one), and Egypt is no different over it's thousands of years of rule.

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

@@Demane69 it doesn't mean literally black as in negroid black skin. it means darker than the whiter ones. Also, Phoenicians used the mines of the coasts o f Britan til Carthage was destroyed. They were mixed semitic and north african. Not blacks. It's said that the Travellers are descended from them , and others are as well.

This documentary has many issues, among others: (1) It is centered on Ireland: not a problem, but should be clear in the title; (2) It is not chronological: why mention the steppes before the hunter-gatherers ? It is a complex story to tell, but the narrative makes it unecessarily complicated.

@AWICKEDVIXEN1999

Ай бұрын

Everyone was hunter gatherers until we had to transition to farming

@tom0968

Ай бұрын

No, you seem to like making it unnecessarily complicated. The periods in time these different ancestors lived Is in chronological order. The fact that this is not 'Memento' but a documentary makes more than one order of events a nono (2) Specially for you though, they added a written introduction that contains the details you missed in the title.(1)

in the thumbnail I thought it was either George Harrison or Russell Brand!

Thanks so much for posting

These Stone monuments we have a lot of Them in Denmark in the countryside small but same construction 😊

Interesting. With Mediterranean DNA found, might explain where the term "black Irish" originated from.

@cywarr

Ай бұрын

Hmm

@MelissaR784

Ай бұрын

@@cywarr It's just a term used for the Irish with an olive complexion who tan easily. It's not a racial slur.

@betsyarehart5441

19 күн бұрын

My dad was pure Norwegian heritage with quite dusky skin shade, black hair and brown eyes. When I asked him about this he called himself a black Norwegian.

Fantastic! Amazing information.

My wife has dark brown hair and blue eyes. So do two of my daughters. How can they say blue eyes and dark hair don't exist, anymore? Am I misinterpreting what they said?

I am 100 per cent Polish. Olive skin, blue eyes , black eyebrows and blonde hair. Sisters both blue eyed with dark brown hair . Nephew blue eyed black hair .

The accusation that "They concocted their own origin story" is quite typical of the attitude of the "Mainstream Academics" who use a "19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline as their foundation of fact" = Belief, not fact. Academics ideally practice "Conscious Thought + Apply Higher Mind" The "Lower Mind aka Ego Mind aka Adolescent Mind" is where all the negative thought energies reside, (the fear baded, prejudice, judgemental, envy, etc, the reacting, accusing, etc.") Discernment rather than Judgemental. It wears ones patients when the behaviors are so obvious yet theres denial. 1. Let the Scientists define their findings. 2. Apply and adhere to the "Standards of Science and Research" 3. Be Conscious in Thought and Applying Higher Mind. Do these and the preoccupation with the "Mainstream" will self resolve. It will be the "Authentic Academic Practice" Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian Tennessee, USA (Authentic Academic) Move beyond the fears and the Ego, and Enjoy the Discoveries. ✨

🙏🏾

Why on Earth is the gene sequencing done in South-Korea instead of Europe? Couldn't they make mistakes/errors over there... or, God forbid, alter the data for different "purposes", so to speak? How can you control for these things? How can you trust their work?

@wandapease-gi8yo

Ай бұрын

Cost of labor perhaps?

@someone3533

Ай бұрын

@@wandapease-gi8yo The issue is: how can you trust their work? How can you control for errors or altering of data?

@TracyD2

Ай бұрын

How can you trust anyone’s work. Why wouldn’t South Korea not be trustworthy?

@someone3533

Ай бұрын

@@TracyD2 Remember the old wisdom: "Trust but verify!"? The issue is: how exactly can you verify their work?

I have dark hair and green eyes ...

So the original settlers of Ireland have no genetic relationship to the current Irish population. My question would be what happened to them? Do their descendants exist?

@christigoth

Күн бұрын

i think some of them do, but basically the Tuatha de Danaan came and slaughtered most of the darker Firbolgs.

In the 1930’s German scientists finally connected the people of Persia and southeast Mesopotamia were the original ancient people of Arya. Dunno how the letter “N” was added at the end of the word, probably the same way Babel became Babylon. Yes, they were called the ancient people of Aryas (Aryans) and did exist.

@genesis2936

6 күн бұрын

BTW, the word “Arya” in Aramaic means lion 🦁!

Eg the idea HG didn’t know their stars and seasons is ludicrous. The agriculturists needed the megalithic structures for social power over others most likely - for their priests and warriors to lord it over the farmers !

The human race originated in what is now norway. They looked like dolph lundgren. As they dispersed southward, their skin got darker and they developed brown eyes and kinky woolly hair. Eventually they arrived in Africa, and today there's still a small remnant of this original human group. With the possible exception of the Ainu of Japan, and also the unfortunate wretches who live in Brooklyn, all other modern humans are a hybrid blend of all other haplogroups, including a certain percentage of neanderthal. Fun fact: MTG is an atavism, with at least 95% neanderthal DNA...

@TB-zw7dt

Ай бұрын

😆

@krono5el

Ай бұрын

thanks for the laugh bub :D

@dingusdingus2152

Ай бұрын

@@krono5el 😁

@pennylockhart9553

Ай бұрын

😂

@43:00 - - Think of the isolation of the villages at that time - - The fact that families slept in real close quarters in one room - - Think of the Egyptian Rulers - - Think of the Kings and queens of Europe and Russia, in recent times, and how inbred they are - - We know that inbreeding is dangerous to the off spring so we don't do it mostly on that basis - - But ancient people were working with a different set of moral guidelines and cultural norms ...

@ellen4956

Ай бұрын

After a few generations they would have seen deformities and weakness. If they suddenly disappeared from the archeology, the greater part of the population may have left as their ruling class (presuming that's what they were) died off or were too disabled to function. On the other hand, these two skeletons prove nothing. It may have been just this one person who resulted from incest. It does not mean it was a way of life.

@YamiKisara

Ай бұрын

Don't flatter yourself: there's a huge population of a certain religion that still considers it normal to marry off first cousins. Historically it was a normal practice among commoners all over the world as well, not just the ruling class, because it ensured what little you owned didn't get divided between several families. It also takes many generations of inbreeding to cause something like the Habsburg jaw, if memory serves right, the chance of having a disabled child is something like 1,8% for (healthy) unrelated people and 5% for siblings (so a huge leap, but still extremely low) - think of it this way: we hunted some species almost to exctintion (like the European Wisent), but managed to get them back from just a few individuals to populations of several hundreds or even thousands, and even though they are all closely related, they don't show signs of inbreeding.

@Debbie_Bcool

Ай бұрын

Oh It still happens a lot. I knew a guy at work that married his cousin, and he was not shy about it.

@summersolstice884

Ай бұрын

@@YamiKisara Yes I am aware of current societies that consider it very natural to follow such a path ... There may not be physical signs like Extreme Bleeding or Jaws BUT how does it effect the brain and ability to think? Could inbreeding be the reason that we were primitive, isolated cave people for so many thousands of years? Are the advancements in technology the result that we finally started to travel, as hunter gathers and mix with distant people who were genetically different from us? Our bodies are just the carriers of our brains and maybe the brain needs that new mixture to move to a higher realm of existence ...

@franceshorton918

Ай бұрын

Agree. And maybe shorter lifespans for women (childbirth was risky) and men (building and farming with no Health and Safety legislation) ! So the consequences of incest or wider family interpreting may not have been obvious. Even natural Out- breeding can produce a dud infant. How could they know?

So the guy being discussed had anscestors who were mounted horse warriors- with their movement west they would have been the inaugural movement of central Asian peoples who periodically swept through Europe looting the settled farming cultures of Europe. best Bruce Peek

The sun is closer in the winter. Perihelion is the point of the Earth's orbit that is nearest to the Sun. This always happens in early January, about two weeks after the December Solstice

🙏🙏💕

Could they be in some way be related to the Melungeon people?

10,000 years. Wow. That’s……..old that’s hard to take in

@Demane69

24 күн бұрын

10k years is nothing in geologic time, or even how long modern humans have been considered modern. We've found archaeological sites older than 10k years over in Turkey. They reflect an early transition between hunter gatherer and early farming, but would mostly be still considered hunter gatherers who formed larger communities. It's nearly entirely dependent on the stability of the environment, and this stability has held until even today. Prior to 12k years or so ago, the ice age maximums had severely disrupted settlements in Europe which has created large gaps in available research and evidence.

I grind my teeth intensely. Anyone digging up my skull might guess my age as far too old.

38:15 No. During the winter of the northern hemisphere, the earth is actually at its closest point to the sun. Distance does not relate directly to surface temperature, rather it's the amount of "solar rays" per surface or energy intake per surface, usually measured in Watts per square meter. In winter it's colder because of the tilt of the earth's axis, making it so that less energy per area hits the earth's surface while in summer it's the other way round. this is also why on or near the equator there are no seasons (at least not like in Europe with spring, summer, autumn, winter). there, the angle of the light hitting the earth is always around 90°. reduce that by a small amount and you start to experience seasons. it's that simple. it has nothing to do with distance. why? the earth's radius is 6350ish km. morning and evening you are by definition that much farther from the sun. do you experience seasons during 1 day? or really great temperature changes EACH and EVERY day? no. thus distance is not the main reason for seasons. 44:15 No. That's actually a modern misconception. For the Pharaoh, it was tradition to adopt close relatives or lovers into the family's inner circle thus becoming "brothers and sisters". Then such a "sister" who was not related by birth at all could become one of the wives of the Pharaoh and maybe even the ḥmt nswt wrt (Great Royal Wife). And lo and behold: Even if the Pharaoh married such a "sister", it didn't mean they actually had sex together. Most of times this was to either legitimize authority or to increase the pool of possible candidates because, unlike the Habsburg monarchy, ancient egyptians knew of the danger of incest and did like described to avoid it. No fast forward millennia to usual people like you and me and scientists: "Oh, brother and sister married? That must mean incest" ...... no, not particularly. It can and it definitely happened (heck, it's still happening or should I say: Fritzlning), but it wasn't a thing in ancient egypt.

We come from God. No mystery😊

@lisaholtzclaw4947

9 күн бұрын

Amen🙏

Thank you so much! Amazing information.

20 scientists -> and helter skelter: First hunter-gathers -> gone, then neolithtic farmers -> overtaken by nomadic stepherders (Yamnaya) -> then ?

Quebec Canada ; maaaany black hair with blue sky eyes here

I would think a burial in the fetal position would be more likely due to less time and less resources. I mean they didn’t have mechanical diggers.

TIL George Harrison was one of the first hunter/gatherers

@acaydia2982

Ай бұрын

Obviously 💀

@joanscott8698

Ай бұрын

Brilliant man

I'd be willing to bet that humans got to Ireland long before 8000 years ago

@constancegreiner906

14 күн бұрын

Didn't the show Time Team have earlier dating?

Through Southern France , Cathars