LIVE Chess Rating Climb to 1400 - Chess.com Speedrun
👨🏽 Play Chess Here: www.chess.com/membership?ref_... 🍒 Most students gain 200+ points in months: chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 81
@Daaayo77710 ай бұрын
Compare this to Gotham videos and its not even close. Gotham just arrogantly makes fun of people while you humbly teach us your thought process
@Dophie1310 ай бұрын
Love these videos. Hearing your thought process is helping my game a lot. Thank you!
@shannonjones887710 ай бұрын
1:15:00 Nelson: just moving my queen and rooks to good squares Stockfish: are you sure about that? Stockfish's evaluation is seriously harsh sometimes. I will say though that explaining the blunder of putting the queen on the unprotected e7 square was super instructive and very much appreciated. Highlighting the fact that the square was unprotected was eye opening because it didn't occur to me at all at first.
@RadishAcceptable10 ай бұрын
Jansen's problem was his own time management... Dude had FIVE MINUTES left on his clock when he blundered his knight, taking only 2 seconds to move... That shouldn't happen.
@akshaygopaul3021
10 ай бұрын
The problem. Bro was playing with his knight only
@davidgongre432710 ай бұрын
I’ve loved watching all these videos. Thanks so much for taking the time and for the instruction. It’s priceless.
@theinquisitor551810 ай бұрын
These videos are so helpful for me as a lowly 1400. Apart from the tips, it's kind of reassuring to know that a 1400 can sometimes put a master in a tricky spot/
@Shaun_GTI10 ай бұрын
Love these videos! Any tips for calculating faster other than puzzles and games?
@FurganManafov9 ай бұрын
Learned a lot, thank you so much!
@renatozeru4 ай бұрын
It's noticeable how the quality of the games improves when you get closer to 1400 rating. Games are harder, opponents start to find good moves, and in many cases, the games go on up to the endgame with holdable positions.
@bonganimathebula321010 ай бұрын
This is the best series ever
@TVGUY33310 ай бұрын
Great series, Nelson. A solid 10. I like your narrative. Oh, I Vibe-rated.
Great video, I'm a beginner, and seeing your thought process and how you play helps a lot.
@belue24293 ай бұрын
Very instructive! Thanks
@stefanosias74229 ай бұрын
151 wins with no losses and draws, that's some win streak! This NM has to be ultra solid and strong, and a bit lucky not to lose on time once in a while. Good podcast tho.
@jaybingham371110 ай бұрын
52:90 'As a result...when the dust cleared...his pieces just happened to end up on great attacking squares.' And no one under 2200 would be responsible (certainly not in whole and very much in doubt as to partly) for such an outcome. Sure, at the SGM level it is controlled better. But still only in part. This is where one kind of luck manifests in human chess. Another kind is when blunders aren't taken advantage of. Despite all these well-documented instances, people still try to insist that there's no such thing as luck in (human) chess. That is definitively not the case. Even MC will look you in the eyes with astonishment and tell you that you are 100% wrong. If you don't necessarily require personal confirmation, then you can find numerous YT videos of MC affirming his beliefs on the matter. So quit trying to reify chess as a pure instrument of supreme intellect. Cuz it's silly. Don't get me wrong...the game does speak to concentration ability, memorization skills and other things we find important and useful. Unarguably. But numerous other games do as well.
@kshitiz6376
9 ай бұрын
What is blud waffling about? 😭
@danielyuan986210 ай бұрын
26:08, I think that's a blunder, because there's Nxd7. You can't take back with the knight because the queen on e7 hangs. You can't trade queens first because white has an intermezzo move Nxf6+, before taking back the queen. The best response is to take the knight with the queen, which loses the queen to Bxh7+, and after Kxh7, Rxe7, and Nxd7. You lose the queen and pawn for the rook and bishop, which is an unfavorable trade, and black has an exposed king and white has initiative. I think black is still better with the extra piece early on, but it's tricky at this point. I'm positive Nelson simply overlooked this line. And I didn't see it either until after Nelson played the move. Quite tricky to find!
@danielyuan9862
10 ай бұрын
Oh wow, it's even worse, 33:11, simply amazing.
@antoniocorreas247410 ай бұрын
Thanks Nelson for playing the Halloween. Very instructive.
@jagi797610 ай бұрын
You’re bodying these kids so hard that 23:29 sounded like a hitmarker
@danielyuan986210 ай бұрын
8:03 Nxc4 doesn't work because of Nxf6+ immediately. If the queen takes back then the knight on e4 is just hanging.
@uthoshantm9 ай бұрын
Your videos are excellent because it's not so high a level that I feel overwhelmed.
@RoaringJaguar4 ай бұрын
That time thing in the beginning had me on my toes - nice checkmate! 😮
@thesapphiregamer163410 ай бұрын
Even more tilting game Starting elo:800 Current elo:154 Wins: 19 Draws: 1 Losses: 35
@MalikEpik
10 ай бұрын
Look for checks captures attacks, are there any checks, and if there any checks are they good, What about captures? Are they good and do they win a piece? What about attacks? Does it improve your position? Are you satisfied with it? Then you do it, also you have to look for maximum dangers, Like forks, free pieces and attacks.
@godwincornelius2019 ай бұрын
wow.... love these. thanks for this
@ZachNovak10 ай бұрын
58:50 the opponent realises the premove and plays KJ4 ahahh
@sebastiaanpeekstok4577
10 ай бұрын
You mean Ng4?
@tiagopaim30608 ай бұрын
i must've watched all your videos by now. I've climbed from 300 to 750 in the process. I've also beaten the 1700 bot once in 10 tries so i'm very optimistic :D
@anshumanpandey854716 күн бұрын
57:16 The opponent was like if I let you chase around my knights while developing pieces then thats just bad so how about you take my fucking extra piece and we move on with the game and I will be happy with 1 pawn advantage.
@GreenRayJC10 ай бұрын
Yeah game 1. I stopped playing that opening it always gave me problems with bishops lined up on the corner. Nobody played like the openings I've studied so I never know what to do. Also I'd never be able to see how to checkmate with so little time on clock.
@holybabble7 ай бұрын
It's like watching 'Mission Impossible'. LoL "I just have to make sure I don't cause a stalemate", in a calm voice, "confirm that the king always has a spot to move..." TICK, TICK, TICK goes the timer! "And I see I can get a check and then a checkmate..." TICK, TICK, TICK!!! 🤣😂🤣
@christopherheckman795710 ай бұрын
5:58 ... Nxe4 opens up another line to e5. 9:51 If White doesn't use his rooks, he really doesn't have them. 11:45 ... d5; Bxc7 Rc8 also looks doable; Black then has two possible attacks on the queen. 39:50 Note that the pawn on g6 is NOT defended. 45:58 It looks like after ... Nd3, Bxd3 wins a piece: ... Rxd3; Bxc5, or ... Bxe3; Rxe3.
@Caladian10 ай бұрын
8:51 Why not KC4 to start it off? Don't you still go up a piece but w/o losing the rook and pawn? Or am I missing something?
@yifansun264710 ай бұрын
Hey what platform do you use to stream so I can join?
@AdrianHernandez-ul4in
10 ай бұрын
he streams on KZread
@yifansun2647
10 ай бұрын
@@AdrianHernandez-ul4in ok thanks
@scotty10 ай бұрын
YOU ARE THE BEST TEACHER !!!
@michaelfortunato18603 ай бұрын
Do your opponents get their rating points back after these rating climb games?
@CMPomozi10 ай бұрын
31:40 I might be wrong, but wasn't Rxh3 winning? Becuase if he plays g5 than you have Rh1#
@ElyashivMalinker
8 ай бұрын
I Like more the move Rb1+, then if: Kh2, Rh1# . And if: Bf1, Bc4, eventually winning a piece.
@ZachNovak10 ай бұрын
at 11:40 is bd4 a move?
@HybridDom10 ай бұрын
I'm curious to see how Game 3 should have developed of black didn't make those few mistakes in the mid game
@Hazzel-wc8bp10 ай бұрын
Can you try the jobava London or the Caro khan ?
@mariuszpudzianowski8400
10 ай бұрын
Jobava London can win you games in like 6 moves, such a good opening.
@robertsabharwal97874 ай бұрын
Would love to see a 15-10 rating climb ... that's what I usually play.
@chinofan10 ай бұрын
are you going to change the Peter-Patzer pfp to Average Joe?
@davew430410 ай бұрын
What are the odds that some of your opponents are also titled players doing a rating climb?
@Verbalaesthet6 ай бұрын
I saw the blunder too.
@robertbrandywineАй бұрын
Wait, is he getting advice from someone on chat? What was that "you were right" business about?
@yusouph200210 ай бұрын
9:20 exd4 cxd4 Bxd4
@mythbusters86610 ай бұрын
24:55 Qe7??
@porkfatrules6025
10 ай бұрын
??
@nightdoge5819
10 ай бұрын
lmao yeah that wouldve been a blunder ??
@CHESSGUY9509 ай бұрын
Its hard to win a game if your opponent doesent blunder anything like how you attack thats my question probably like in 1500
@yyyy-uv3po10 ай бұрын
Is it me or this video (and the following) doesn't appear in "Videos" ? Also, the algorithm doesn't recommend it to me.
@mariuszpudzianowski840010 ай бұрын
So many mistakes in second game: a3 is useless move that early, even bad if you castle short. Move order was wrong, Nbd2 should have been played earlier, trading dark squared bishops was wrong. Everybody plays London, nobody knows anything more than basic setup. Eric Rosen did over 3 hours of videos on that and people still refuse to invest their time in learning more about what they play.
@michaelmassaro437510 ай бұрын
How is the Blood clot situation going with your leg I hope it has gone away and everything under control
@karyoplasma10 ай бұрын
If you want to do me a favor, consider playing the English. It's a cool opening imo.
@mariuszpudzianowski8400
10 ай бұрын
Black plays symmetrical and we have the most boring game of the series. Sorry but you know it's true, symmetrical English is boooooring.
@kshitiz6376
9 ай бұрын
@@Earl3710 Why tf would he lose playing the English???
@minshan85088 ай бұрын
80% is terrible in 1400 rating, by the way. 80% is a standard 900 rating
@toothlessrpm6177
7 ай бұрын
Yeah but playing 80% at a higher level is surely harder ?
@spooging10 ай бұрын
Weird seeing someone lower on time than you. Kinda sussy.
@FilmCutsReal
10 ай бұрын
What you said doesn't make any sense whatsoever
@spooging
10 ай бұрын
@@FilmCutsReal oh no. It makes sense. You’re just small brained.
@jot2b
10 ай бұрын
@@FilmCutsRealshe is saying Nelson generally is lower on time during games, despite all his wins. This has been mansplaining with Me. 😜
@cesarcardozo2617
10 ай бұрын
Yep, except that guy who reported Nelson as a cheater. Its like 2nd time I see it...
@Keldor314
10 ай бұрын
Yeah, it's almost like this was the first time we saw an opponent with decent time management skills.
@shaggysunshine744110 ай бұрын
At the risk of jinxing not watching ALL of the video yet. I bet you get a loss by 1550 Elo. I know if i play Martin to much i play like him. Why i try playing higher elo bots
@jaybingham3711
10 ай бұрын
52:90 'As a result...when the dust cleared...his pieces just happened to end up on great attacking squares.' And no one under 2200 would be responsible (certainly not in whole and very much in doubt as to partly) for such an outcome. Sure, at the SGM level it is controlled better. But still only in part. This is where one kind of luck manifests in human chess. Another kind is when blunders aren't taken advantage of. Despite all these well-documented instances, people still try to insist that there's no such thing as luck in (human) chess. That is definitively not the case. Even MC will look you in the eyes with astonishment and tell you that you are 100% wrong. If you don't necessarily require personal confirmation, then you can find numerous YT videos of MC affirming his beliefs on the matter. So quit trying to reify chess as a pure instrument of supreme intellect. Cuz it's silly. Don't get me wrong...the game does speak to concentration ability, memorization skills and other things we find important. Unarguably. But numerous other games do as well.
@aljuvialle10 ай бұрын
Could you please cut these live video records? for me it's more useful to watch them when they're way shorter, like 20-30 minutes. I don't have time to watch them when you're presenting a live session.
Пікірлер: 81
Compare this to Gotham videos and its not even close. Gotham just arrogantly makes fun of people while you humbly teach us your thought process
Love these videos. Hearing your thought process is helping my game a lot. Thank you!
1:15:00 Nelson: just moving my queen and rooks to good squares Stockfish: are you sure about that? Stockfish's evaluation is seriously harsh sometimes. I will say though that explaining the blunder of putting the queen on the unprotected e7 square was super instructive and very much appreciated. Highlighting the fact that the square was unprotected was eye opening because it didn't occur to me at all at first.
Jansen's problem was his own time management... Dude had FIVE MINUTES left on his clock when he blundered his knight, taking only 2 seconds to move... That shouldn't happen.
@akshaygopaul3021
10 ай бұрын
The problem. Bro was playing with his knight only
I’ve loved watching all these videos. Thanks so much for taking the time and for the instruction. It’s priceless.
These videos are so helpful for me as a lowly 1400. Apart from the tips, it's kind of reassuring to know that a 1400 can sometimes put a master in a tricky spot/
Love these videos! Any tips for calculating faster other than puzzles and games?
Learned a lot, thank you so much!
It's noticeable how the quality of the games improves when you get closer to 1400 rating. Games are harder, opponents start to find good moves, and in many cases, the games go on up to the endgame with holdable positions.
This is the best series ever
Great series, Nelson. A solid 10. I like your narrative. Oh, I Vibe-rated.
@BPGHchess
10 ай бұрын
no pun intended?
Keep them coming. I'm watching them all!
Extremely helpful! Thank you so much 😊
nice , simple thinking process, really helpfull thnx!!
Great video, I'm a beginner, and seeing your thought process and how you play helps a lot.
Very instructive! Thanks
151 wins with no losses and draws, that's some win streak! This NM has to be ultra solid and strong, and a bit lucky not to lose on time once in a while. Good podcast tho.
52:90 'As a result...when the dust cleared...his pieces just happened to end up on great attacking squares.' And no one under 2200 would be responsible (certainly not in whole and very much in doubt as to partly) for such an outcome. Sure, at the SGM level it is controlled better. But still only in part. This is where one kind of luck manifests in human chess. Another kind is when blunders aren't taken advantage of. Despite all these well-documented instances, people still try to insist that there's no such thing as luck in (human) chess. That is definitively not the case. Even MC will look you in the eyes with astonishment and tell you that you are 100% wrong. If you don't necessarily require personal confirmation, then you can find numerous YT videos of MC affirming his beliefs on the matter. So quit trying to reify chess as a pure instrument of supreme intellect. Cuz it's silly. Don't get me wrong...the game does speak to concentration ability, memorization skills and other things we find important and useful. Unarguably. But numerous other games do as well.
@kshitiz6376
9 ай бұрын
What is blud waffling about? 😭
26:08, I think that's a blunder, because there's Nxd7. You can't take back with the knight because the queen on e7 hangs. You can't trade queens first because white has an intermezzo move Nxf6+, before taking back the queen. The best response is to take the knight with the queen, which loses the queen to Bxh7+, and after Kxh7, Rxe7, and Nxd7. You lose the queen and pawn for the rook and bishop, which is an unfavorable trade, and black has an exposed king and white has initiative. I think black is still better with the extra piece early on, but it's tricky at this point. I'm positive Nelson simply overlooked this line. And I didn't see it either until after Nelson played the move. Quite tricky to find!
@danielyuan9862
10 ай бұрын
Oh wow, it's even worse, 33:11, simply amazing.
Thanks Nelson for playing the Halloween. Very instructive.
You’re bodying these kids so hard that 23:29 sounded like a hitmarker
8:03 Nxc4 doesn't work because of Nxf6+ immediately. If the queen takes back then the knight on e4 is just hanging.
Your videos are excellent because it's not so high a level that I feel overwhelmed.
That time thing in the beginning had me on my toes - nice checkmate! 😮
Even more tilting game Starting elo:800 Current elo:154 Wins: 19 Draws: 1 Losses: 35
@MalikEpik
10 ай бұрын
Look for checks captures attacks, are there any checks, and if there any checks are they good, What about captures? Are they good and do they win a piece? What about attacks? Does it improve your position? Are you satisfied with it? Then you do it, also you have to look for maximum dangers, Like forks, free pieces and attacks.
wow.... love these. thanks for this
58:50 the opponent realises the premove and plays KJ4 ahahh
@sebastiaanpeekstok4577
10 ай бұрын
You mean Ng4?
i must've watched all your videos by now. I've climbed from 300 to 750 in the process. I've also beaten the 1700 bot once in 10 tries so i'm very optimistic :D
57:16 The opponent was like if I let you chase around my knights while developing pieces then thats just bad so how about you take my fucking extra piece and we move on with the game and I will be happy with 1 pawn advantage.
Yeah game 1. I stopped playing that opening it always gave me problems with bishops lined up on the corner. Nobody played like the openings I've studied so I never know what to do. Also I'd never be able to see how to checkmate with so little time on clock.
It's like watching 'Mission Impossible'. LoL "I just have to make sure I don't cause a stalemate", in a calm voice, "confirm that the king always has a spot to move..." TICK, TICK, TICK goes the timer! "And I see I can get a check and then a checkmate..." TICK, TICK, TICK!!! 🤣😂🤣
5:58 ... Nxe4 opens up another line to e5. 9:51 If White doesn't use his rooks, he really doesn't have them. 11:45 ... d5; Bxc7 Rc8 also looks doable; Black then has two possible attacks on the queen. 39:50 Note that the pawn on g6 is NOT defended. 45:58 It looks like after ... Nd3, Bxd3 wins a piece: ... Rxd3; Bxc5, or ... Bxe3; Rxe3.
8:51 Why not KC4 to start it off? Don't you still go up a piece but w/o losing the rook and pawn? Or am I missing something?
Hey what platform do you use to stream so I can join?
@AdrianHernandez-ul4in
10 ай бұрын
he streams on KZread
@yifansun2647
10 ай бұрын
@@AdrianHernandez-ul4in ok thanks
YOU ARE THE BEST TEACHER !!!
Do your opponents get their rating points back after these rating climb games?
31:40 I might be wrong, but wasn't Rxh3 winning? Becuase if he plays g5 than you have Rh1#
@ElyashivMalinker
8 ай бұрын
I Like more the move Rb1+, then if: Kh2, Rh1# . And if: Bf1, Bc4, eventually winning a piece.
at 11:40 is bd4 a move?
I'm curious to see how Game 3 should have developed of black didn't make those few mistakes in the mid game
Can you try the jobava London or the Caro khan ?
@mariuszpudzianowski8400
10 ай бұрын
Jobava London can win you games in like 6 moves, such a good opening.
Would love to see a 15-10 rating climb ... that's what I usually play.
are you going to change the Peter-Patzer pfp to Average Joe?
What are the odds that some of your opponents are also titled players doing a rating climb?
I saw the blunder too.
Wait, is he getting advice from someone on chat? What was that "you were right" business about?
9:20 exd4 cxd4 Bxd4
24:55 Qe7??
@porkfatrules6025
10 ай бұрын
??
@nightdoge5819
10 ай бұрын
lmao yeah that wouldve been a blunder ??
Its hard to win a game if your opponent doesent blunder anything like how you attack thats my question probably like in 1500
Is it me or this video (and the following) doesn't appear in "Videos" ? Also, the algorithm doesn't recommend it to me.
So many mistakes in second game: a3 is useless move that early, even bad if you castle short. Move order was wrong, Nbd2 should have been played earlier, trading dark squared bishops was wrong. Everybody plays London, nobody knows anything more than basic setup. Eric Rosen did over 3 hours of videos on that and people still refuse to invest their time in learning more about what they play.
How is the Blood clot situation going with your leg I hope it has gone away and everything under control
If you want to do me a favor, consider playing the English. It's a cool opening imo.
@mariuszpudzianowski8400
10 ай бұрын
Black plays symmetrical and we have the most boring game of the series. Sorry but you know it's true, symmetrical English is boooooring.
@kshitiz6376
9 ай бұрын
@@Earl3710 Why tf would he lose playing the English???
80% is terrible in 1400 rating, by the way. 80% is a standard 900 rating
@toothlessrpm6177
7 ай бұрын
Yeah but playing 80% at a higher level is surely harder ?
Weird seeing someone lower on time than you. Kinda sussy.
@FilmCutsReal
10 ай бұрын
What you said doesn't make any sense whatsoever
@spooging
10 ай бұрын
@@FilmCutsReal oh no. It makes sense. You’re just small brained.
@jot2b
10 ай бұрын
@@FilmCutsRealshe is saying Nelson generally is lower on time during games, despite all his wins. This has been mansplaining with Me. 😜
@cesarcardozo2617
10 ай бұрын
Yep, except that guy who reported Nelson as a cheater. Its like 2nd time I see it...
@Keldor314
10 ай бұрын
Yeah, it's almost like this was the first time we saw an opponent with decent time management skills.
At the risk of jinxing not watching ALL of the video yet. I bet you get a loss by 1550 Elo. I know if i play Martin to much i play like him. Why i try playing higher elo bots
@jaybingham3711
10 ай бұрын
52:90 'As a result...when the dust cleared...his pieces just happened to end up on great attacking squares.' And no one under 2200 would be responsible (certainly not in whole and very much in doubt as to partly) for such an outcome. Sure, at the SGM level it is controlled better. But still only in part. This is where one kind of luck manifests in human chess. Another kind is when blunders aren't taken advantage of. Despite all these well-documented instances, people still try to insist that there's no such thing as luck in (human) chess. That is definitively not the case. Even MC will look you in the eyes with astonishment and tell you that you are 100% wrong. If you don't necessarily require personal confirmation, then you can find numerous YT videos of MC affirming his beliefs on the matter. So quit trying to reify chess as a pure instrument of supreme intellect. Cuz it's silly. Don't get me wrong...the game does speak to concentration ability, memorization skills and other things we find important. Unarguably. But numerous other games do as well.
Could you please cut these live video records? for me it's more useful to watch them when they're way shorter, like 20-30 minutes. I don't have time to watch them when you're presenting a live session.
Upload as normal video. Better for algorythm.