Error 1 - collecting as many citations as possible (quality > quantity) Error 2- claiming research is entirely unique, that there is nothing published on the topic ( know knowledge giants) Error 3- citing only second and third hand accounts of classics (read classics but critically as the findings or methods might b outdated so exercise caution) Hope that saved you time!

@pratimagurung5383

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much, this made easy for me to revisit Dr. Patton's sharing.

@JMan1380

Жыл бұрын

It saved me having to listen again for these notes!

My practical research module brought me here

@yahnami1332

3 жыл бұрын

same :

@edwardbakiao5094

3 жыл бұрын

Send answer

@royvincentgeneralrespecio3151

2 жыл бұрын

same

@zennyannespinoza5974

2 жыл бұрын

Same

As a Humanities PhD student in her first year, and grappling with the literature at the moment, I cannot tell you how helpful this is. Thank you for sharing such wisdom!

Thank you, Dr. Patton and the Center for Research Quality. I have not considered, in terms of my "intellectual heritage," the many sources of established work and knowledge available to build on. Perhaps, I have taken for granted and stand guilty of "quantitative" gathering of articles in my study approach. This is a defining and humbling moment for me... and at the appropriate time.

Thank you Dr. Patton. Awesome explanation of where the scholar-practitioner is in terms of the known knowledge of their chosen research problem, research questions and research topic and how to contribute to that knowledge based on the intellectual gyneology and traditions by identifying the knowledge gap specifically and addressing the gap within the knowledge gyneology context. The other point of focusing on the theoretical and methodological streams was very interesting in terms of the method-finding link because it provided insight into the validity, reliability, and amenability to a scientific inquiry of the research problem and research questions relevant to the research topic.

Great presentation Dr. Panton, as a scholar-practitioner, I learned more from your video. God blesses you

In all my studies, no one had explained the purpose of a literature review like this video has. Thank you Dr. Patton.

Thank you Dr. Patton for this overview.

Great video on typical errors to avoid within a literature review!

Doctor, you have given me a much clearer path and loved your coin terms(i plan to implement during my defense) like " Intellectual Heritage and Genealogy, etc. You are now on my top list of Scholars. Thanks from the depths of my heart for your transferring of knowledge that is helping me to be successful....

Oh man, this open up my mind. I thought that quantity that counts.

Thank you so much, Dr. Patton. I take with me many learning points from your sharings in this video. Regards from Kolkata, India.

Thank you! Very clear, informative, and open-minded!

great explanation and the examples making it easy to be understood. Thank you

You're the man, Doctor.

Thank you very much Dr. Patton

Thank you Dr.Patton

(5:45) Identify people /intellectual giants.. Identify traditions... Identifyt your Intellectual DNA

Very helpful explication.

this has helped so much - thank you!

Great work that is useful to me! Thank you very much!1

Thanks for this, many scholars use 30% of target population as a sample size by citing (patton,2002) but I cannot access the book saying this. Can any one confirm this to me please?

Incredibly helpful

Theoretical and methodological streams.(11:42)

Thanks! Very inspiring!

Impressive! Thank you.

Thanks for sharing...Best regards, SH

Great work.

Thank you for this one! :)

Very helpful thank you.

Very helpful!

Very inspiring. Thank you

Thank you so much for this knowledge you are sharing. It has really made my work towards lit review much more focused now

Great! Thanks a lot.

Thank you for this explanation

@maramezina1094

4 жыл бұрын

i come after one year.I will come back when I finish my doctoral journey😊

Very Informative

Thank you! I also found the homosexual-penguin research topic quite funny.

Very useful! Thank you for sharing!

goodluck sa module mga pre! HSJAHSJA

This is like there is only one way to think in research. I mean there is a lot of good point to fetch from this video, but learning how researchers think (he phrases it like science thinks) is to take it too far. Try to look at the litterature review that Einstein, Bohr or Nash did. They are actually not very alike and very different from what Ph.D fellows are supposed to do today. By the way I am not even sure if either Darwin, Marx or Freud ever did any litterature review as such. No doubt they read a lot, but that is a completely different matter. What I am pointing towards is that litterature review can be a way of documenting you research inheritage but it is not the only way - it is more the way our schools demand it. Great new knowledge is created or found outside those schools.

@gguitar2438

6 жыл бұрын

Interesting point. However, I am not sure the speech implies there is only one way and denies there may be multiple ones. Perhaps the speech is given with in mind his primary audience, informing them of standard practices suitable for a course within a specific time frame

useful , thank you

thanks doctor

I like it, learned something new -> 204 likes 0 dislikes, I think that tells a lot!

@chubbyBunny94

7 жыл бұрын

nine dislikes.. had to qinx it, aye? :P

thank you thank you thank you thank you!!!!!!

@shuaeb1000

7 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much for adding very good information to my knowledge which without any doubt it will help me with my writing

Thank...!

Thank you very much

He's good

it is better if you are added the time

My module brought me here... Activity 1: Take a view

2:48

PR2 Activity 1: Take a View

nice

unfortunately, many instructors only allow sources within the last 5 years. The classics are not valuable to many instructors.

goodluck sa module ahhahaa

before i clicked i was sure he is george carlin

Im find it difficult to find literature on the area of "is Gay BDSM really only just a pain in the ass"

Who's here because of modules?

@jimmichaelracaza1007

3 жыл бұрын

wew. activity 1: take a view page 29

@jessamaejunasa883

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimmichaelracaza1007 Senior High School Student? Appear!!!

@oppaihater4745

2 жыл бұрын

Same hahaha

send answer sa practical reserach hahaaha

🙋🙋

PR brought me here 😕

Hi classmates HAHAHAHA

@althearalustian7073

Жыл бұрын

ginagawa mo HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

@andreikleinerumpon3506

Жыл бұрын

Ba't kayo herr ahh?

@rizzamendina476

Жыл бұрын

Hi pare

@FilipeLosoft

2 ай бұрын

Hello 😂😂😂😂😂😂

fruitful

hi to my pangit classmates

@rizzamendina476

Жыл бұрын

eww

Sorry, but Marx was not the only to ask those questions. Where did child labor laws and workplace regulation come from, Marx?? Noo, they came from others had the same observations and sought to improve working conditions without massive gov't bureaucracy (which you admit was a failure) but by legislation. By the way your not referring to Groucho, right? Just checking because much of communism is more like the Marx Bros, than the idealized one your thinking of.

My module brought me here... Activity 1: Take a view

@davidjeffantipaso8291

2 жыл бұрын

(2)