LET'S NOT FIND OUT! Canadian's First Time Reacting To 5 Reasons You Shouldn't Mess With The USA!

Ойын-сауық

Hello everyone! Today, we’re stepping into a unique video reaction as we, a Canadian couple, explore "5 Reasons You Shouldn't Mess With The USA." This video discusses various aspects that highlight the military and strategic strengths of the United States. Join us to find out what makes the USA a formidable nation, and see our reaction to the reasons listed!
⭐️ WHAT WE EXPLORE IN THIS VIDEO:
Our reactions to the top five reasons that supposedly make the USA an untouchable superpower.
Discussing each reason in terms of historical context and current global standings.
Analyzing the implications of these reasons on international relations and perceptions.
Sharing insights into how different or similar Canada's approach is in comparison to its neighbor.
🌍 ABOUT THE VIDEO:
The original content discusses various military, technological, and economic factors that contribute to the USA's status as a global powerhouse. From military might to cultural influence, this video breaks down what it claims are deterrents against challenging the United States on the world stage.
👫 WHO WE ARE:
We're a Canadian couple fascinated by global dynamics and international relations. Our channel delves into reactions on a variety of topics, providing a Canadian perspective while appreciating the complexities of global affairs.
💬 COMMENT BELOW:
What are your thoughts on the reasons discussed in the video?
How do you think other countries measure up in terms of similar strengths?
--------------------------------------
You can find 5 Reasons You Shouldn't Mess With The USA on KZread here:
• 5 Reasons You Shouldn'...
--------------------------------------
For any reaction suggestions - drop them in the comments!
--------------------------------------
For donations to the channel or content requests:
www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...
--------------------------------------
#5reasons #usamilitary #war

Пікірлер: 585

  • @ExUSSailor
    @ExUSSailor2 ай бұрын

    This is a couple of years old already. The newest carrier, the first-in-her-class USS Gerald R. Ford has been on active deployment for close to a year now.

  • @Silky808

    @Silky808

    2 ай бұрын

    Yeah this old, because I believe the Royal Navy has retired the other carrier, so they are really down to one now.

  • @carladavis1473

    @carladavis1473

    2 ай бұрын

    Who's the captain?

  • @Kaddywompous

    @Kaddywompous

    2 ай бұрын

    May it last longer than Ford’s presidency.

  • @ricktaylor5397

    @ricktaylor5397

    2 ай бұрын

    More updates…F-35 Lightning II, can now carry nuclear bombs…The successor to the B-2 is now ready…

  • @Reblwitoutacause

    @Reblwitoutacause

    2 ай бұрын

    ​@carladavis1473 look at me. i am the captain now.

  • @xJamesLaughx
    @xJamesLaughx2 ай бұрын

    Thing about being the size of a bumblebee on radars is that most radar systems are programmed to ignore anything that small and not even display it on any radar screens.

  • @bamacopeland4372

    @bamacopeland4372

    2 ай бұрын

    F22 "would you intercept me"

  • @timmooney7528

    @timmooney7528

    2 ай бұрын

    Then again, software can be designed to detect abnormal patterns. Bees don't fly at supersonic speeds, and a big swarm of bees flying at high altitudes and high rates of speed would be obvious that they are not bees.

  • @aDrummerThatisBored

    @aDrummerThatisBored

    2 ай бұрын

    ​@bamacopeland4372 "I'd Intercept me" -The Kid.

  • @ericsteffen5619
    @ericsteffen56192 ай бұрын

    I spent 4 years on a Los Angeles class fast attack submarine. We are without a doubt the baddest fish in the water. Capable of penetrating carrier group defenses and sinking carriers. Did it to our own Carriers in war games on a regular basis, if you put the designation of SS (submarine service) to your rate and rank it meant you were top 10% of the military in training, security clearance, (takes a top secret security clearance just to be a cook on a nuclear sub. It takes a special breed to serve on a boat that sinks itself. once stayed submerged for 68 days without surfacing!

  • @jeff1930

    @jeff1930

    2 ай бұрын

    68?? Amateur. Try 102 on a missile boat.

  • @philchurch1115

    @philchurch1115

    2 ай бұрын

    @@jeff1930 Try 120 days straight in the Indian Ocean..

  • @philchurch1115

    @philchurch1115

    2 ай бұрын

    I was in 1982 to 1988 AZ2 VS-41 & 33 two west pacs and you are correct Sir and with us now having 11 aircraft carriers no one should mess with us..

  • @denkeylee

    @denkeylee

    2 ай бұрын

    You didn't mention the sub thats also protecting the CAG. Please, inform.

  • @kyfarm

    @kyfarm

    Ай бұрын

    Oh Lord! I have difficulty breathing just reading those words. I had issues on the submarine ride at Disneyland. Special breed indeed, kudos to you people who can do what I can't even imagine.

  • @endoraismygma
    @endoraismygma2 ай бұрын

    This US Navy veteran thinks y'all are awesome. Love our Canadian neighbors, it's on my Bucket List to visit!

  • @mikemaricle9941

    @mikemaricle9941

    2 ай бұрын

    This AF Blue Zoomie concurs.

  • @donmurray6362

    @donmurray6362

    2 ай бұрын

    Love to have you. Make sure you plan what you want to see and take a lot of time. Canada is massive and diverse.

  • @boki1693

    @boki1693

    2 ай бұрын

    When I was a kid from about 1968 to 1973, we went to Montreal from Long Island by car every year to see the Expo( Worlds Fair) And once to Toronto. It was hella fun once we got there. The 11 hours it took us to get there though was a little rough.

  • @donmurray6362

    @donmurray6362

    2 ай бұрын

    I took a job transfer and moved from Kelowna, British Columbia to Ottawa, Ontario. 5 days. 40 hours of driving. Loved it. What an adventure. Mountains, desert, prairies, forest, lakes. Everything but the ocean.

  • @c.j.7752

    @c.j.7752

    2 ай бұрын

    You should go. I always looked forward to being dispatched into Canada.

  • @user-qb1fh4hp4z
    @user-qb1fh4hp4z2 ай бұрын

    You should check out anything by The Fat Electrician. Not only are they some of the most accurate videos in the military field but he's truly. funny. You'll be amazed at some of the crazy American war history.

  • @user-nr5ux7gr2g

    @user-nr5ux7gr2g

    2 ай бұрын

    And other countries military stories too

  • @jbs2763

    @jbs2763

    2 ай бұрын

    Start with “Proportional”

  • @user-nr5ux7gr2g

    @user-nr5ux7gr2g

    2 ай бұрын

    @@jbs2763 proportional, potential and appropriate are three great stories

  • @JoelV.-sx8db

    @JoelV.-sx8db

    2 ай бұрын

    Check video. US enemies are not going to like this. Better military comparison. I am US veteran

  • @kalelson8861

    @kalelson8861

    Ай бұрын

    Fat electrician is the best. Great storyteller that's also witty and very efficient

  • @maximus11400
    @maximus114002 ай бұрын

    They also didn't mention that we have the best battle Tank in the world as well. The M1 Abrams is a bad ass beast. I know first hand, I drove the M1A1 for 4 years and durning Desert Storm!

  • @BidensTinks-fj9ix

    @BidensTinks-fj9ix

    2 ай бұрын

    Thank you so much for defending freedom!!! God bless you!

  • @yungdaggerdic1625

    @yungdaggerdic1625

    2 ай бұрын

    M1 is great, but a german Leopard 2 is amazing aswell. Although they have different strengths and weaknesses which is why each one is made more for slightly different missions. M1 is just a big ass armored beast, and Leopard is a faster more versatile tank...in my opinion.

  • @timmooney7528

    @timmooney7528

    2 ай бұрын

    Like every other tank in the world, the M1 is also vulnerable to kamikaze drones. It's armor is intended to protect the crew from other tanks and anti-tank missiles, however the drones can be steered into the areas where the armor is the weakest.

  • @RandyStalding

    @RandyStalding

    Ай бұрын

    We should be concerned about $900 drones being used by the Ukrainians and the Russians. RPG7's are being attached to suicide drones. Tanks are being attacked by 3 drones at a time. Hatches cannot be left open for even an instant as the drones can loiter for a long time over a tank without the tankers knowledge.

  • @jonathanryan9946

    @jonathanryan9946

    17 күн бұрын

    ​@@yungdaggerdic1625 I mean technically they were originally the same tank. So yeah, both are great tanks. It's just that during development Germany wanted a diesel engine and the US wanted a multifuel turbine engine. So the development split into two sibling designs bit both based on the same core concept. America just went with the best parts (read most expensive and hardest to maintain for a tiny bit of extra capability) plus depleted uranium armor in US only versions (no allies get that export model). While Germany went with easier to maintain parts that were mostly good enough. Obviously after that both countries added different upgrade packages. So the older Leopard 1 and M1-A1 are roughly the same generation, while the Leopard II and M1-A2 are the same generation too, and both a step up from the previous. Meaning a later Leopard II model is better than the base M1 or M1-A1, and the M1-A2 sep v2 or 3 is definitely better than the Leopard I. The latest Leopard 2A7 and M1-A2 Sep V3 are the latest generation of each (though there is a Sep V4 prototype and an Abrams X, but I digress). Generally US has slightly stronger armor but its more of a pain in the ass to upgrade/repair as it's not modular like the Leopard. As to fire power, they got the same cannon, so the only difference is ammunition which is a different topic but overall let's just say the or near tie. The Abrams has a more powerful engine but the tank is way heavier with all the stuff the US added, so it's a tiny bit slower. It's also less fuel efficient, but can use any fuel from diesel to jet fuel. So this is more a personal preference thing, the US wanted raw power to fit more stuff on it and heavier armor, plus more fuel options... the catch is they're slower with less range before needing to refuel. Also the Abrams engine is super quiet, it's nicknamed the whispering death, but while great at sneaking up vs people isn't that useful vs drones high in the sky. The one undisputed area the Abrams sepv3 beats the Leopard 2A7 is electronic. From fire control to electronic warfare and command and control the US has spared no expense. When US politicians brag about having the best tank in the world this is always their first bullet point. The Abrams is slightly more survivable. Beyond depleted uranium armor, it also has blowout panels. So unlike Russian tanks that blow their turret when hit. US Abrams have the ammunition sealed off from the crew and a hatch that "blows out" so that explosive force goes away from the crew. The Leopard doesn't have this. If you want to show off at a competition the Leopard will probably win due to its lighter weight and faster speed nearly every time... but in a war, the Abrams is slightly more survivable and has the edge in acquiring a target due to its electronics so can get rounds on the enemy faster. However... They're essentially just the same tank that two neighbors just customized differently at the end of the day. That prototype was called the MBT-70. While the US can afford all the extra bells and whistles they put on the Abrams for slightly improved performance in war at the cost of weight, fuel consumptionand, and speed, honestly when it comes to supporting Ukraine, the Leopard 2 is superior because it's more in their capabilities to maintain. What good is the slightly more technological tank if they can't repair it as well and supply it with fuel as easily? The Leopard was designed to be easier to work on which is great for a conscript army to learn to repair fast. The Abrams was the version where they wanted a few extra capabilities at the expense of being more difficult to maintain. This mindset is better for a standing army who can be trained before the war starts on it.

  • @Oldschoolnana
    @Oldschoolnana2 ай бұрын

    God Bless all of our soldiers & veterans. We thank you for your sacrifice. My dad served on an aircraft carrier in WW2.🇺🇲🇺🇸

  • @Silky808

    @Silky808

    2 ай бұрын

    Thank you to your father for his service and sacrifice. They paved the way for is current military folks.

  • @davidboivin7996
    @davidboivin79962 ай бұрын

    They didnt mention the Navy's Amphibious Assault Ships (10 of them). They are basically mini Carriers. Each carrier has 24 total of a mix of 8-16 Fighters and 8-16 Helicopters (Attack/Transport).

  • @Rock_Snob

    @Rock_Snob

    2 ай бұрын

    This video is quite a few years old.

  • @mikee4596

    @mikee4596

    2 ай бұрын

    @@Rock_Snob it's not that the videos old, it's that people dont think of the amphibious assaults as air craft carriers because the US doesn't classify them as such even though they're more capable then other navies carriers. They also have a different mission set, less power projection for show and more kinetic power projection USMC style

  • @Rock_Snob

    @Rock_Snob

    2 ай бұрын

    @@mikee4596 it’s old… I have seen that same video many times over the years.

  • @mikee4596

    @mikee4596

    2 ай бұрын

    @@Rock_Snob it's old, the Ford already on deployment not on the way as video stated. But thats besides the point of OPs statement. We have 10 assault ships that are as good as most other nations frontline carriers and have had them for a long time. The age of the video is irrelevant

  • @Rock_Snob

    @Rock_Snob

    2 ай бұрын

    @@mikee4596 dude your comment is irrelevant… I just said it was old! Have a good troll👿

  • @daveray44
    @daveray442 ай бұрын

    I used to be an Electro-mechanical team chief, forthe Minuteman Missile, in MT. It was so humbling to look at the warhead on top of the missile, sitting in its silo

  • @zackster1973
    @zackster19732 ай бұрын

    Actually, China has over 500 Navy vessels. The US has just under 400. Its not the number, its the quality!

  • @Silky808

    @Silky808

    2 ай бұрын

    The Chinese naval fleet has conventional petroleum powered engines. Which means they cannot go too far without needing to be refueled. Most US naval vessels are Nuclear powered and can circle the world for months on end without needing to be re-fueled.

  • @elevenbucks5682

    @elevenbucks5682

    2 ай бұрын

    its also the weight.

  • @tripsixx5802

    @tripsixx5802

    2 ай бұрын

    Carriers are repurposed Soviet ships with ski ramp rather than catapult, which means they are only capable of launching very lightly armed flying go karts 😂

  • @valoriemurray2688

    @valoriemurray2688

    2 ай бұрын

    lol china counts every boat it is in the definition of “military vessels” the better judge is tonage

  • @knightwolf3511

    @knightwolf3511

    2 ай бұрын

    @@tripsixx5802 there trying to create a catapult on one of there ships but unknow if they got it to work or not but it sounds like the ship isn't going to fight any time soon

  • @davidbigd9047
    @davidbigd90472 ай бұрын

    For Boeing, I’m certain their Military hardware Department is separate from their commercial aircraft Department.

  • @wesleyb1458

    @wesleyb1458

    2 ай бұрын

    Oh yes without a doubt

  • @Plastikdoom
    @Plastikdoom2 ай бұрын

    As too the trouble with Boeings aircraft, yes they are issues, for anyone wondering why. Seriously, look up the age of the Boeing 707 and 737, look at when they were designed and first adopted, go look that up, then realize, the ones placing trouble with them, are privately owned companies, that have routinely neglected upgrades and good maintenance, all so they could a few bucks, while ever increasing the cost of tickets, and cramming more and more seats into the multiple decades old airframes, so they can squeeze even more dollars out the people that they have a monopoly over, those are the only ones having theses problems, the money hungry, multi billionaires who profit off of us, unreasonably, the us military has used the same exact aircraft even earlier than any private operators by a handful of years, they don’t have doors fall off, as they do proper maintenance, every day, all day long, and do upgrades as needed. So before anyone shits on Boeing, even more, how many decades did it take before this started happening, I’ll answer 3-5 decades…of constant, daily use flying all over the US and the planet. Before these problems happened, this isn’t Boeings fault, they worked for at least 3 decades, straight, with the bare minimum done by the civilian world. To keep them operating, it’s an airline problem. That refuse to spend any extra cent anywhere, because they are greedy scum. I worked on attack helicopters for the USMC even older than that, half my squadrons birds first flew and fought in early Vietnam. We never had a single part fall off, that wasn’t shot off, we, my unit had the best safety record of the entire US Military for many many years, and a lot of those years, were consecutive. The only time other units, of the same platforms had parts fall off. Was due to human error, by the maintainers. Never due to part failure, of a far more complex system, helicopters that are older, been through way more stress in flight, aka combat, literally being shot, and pulling way g’s and etc than book says is acceptable and constant flight in training also. Trust me, Boeing knows how to make aircraft, very well, it’s not a design fault on their part, it’s an operator issue.

  • @HemlockRidge
    @HemlockRidge2 ай бұрын

    Only the Boeing 737 Max 9, had a problem. None of the others in the 737 "family" have had that problem. Neither do the 747, 767, 777, or 787 families. Although Boeing does make a couple of missiles (as do Lockheed Martin, and Northrup Grumman), most of the US military's missiles are made by Raytheon.

  • @frankscarborough1428
    @frankscarborough14282 ай бұрын

    God bless our military. Will always support you

  • @George-kv6gm
    @George-kv6gm2 ай бұрын

    As has been mentioned before, check out the Fat Electrician. He's really funny, and you'll learn a lot about some of the coolest military happenings and stuff! For a first one, I'd suggest The Most Gangster Jet Fighter of All Time, the F-15 Eagle! Thanks, and God bless you!

  • @timmooney7528

    @timmooney7528

    2 ай бұрын

    The newest version of the F-15 carries alot more missiles than the previous versions. It is speculated that they would act as missile trucks, and the F-35's would pick out the targets, then the F-15's would fire their missiles.

  • @George-kv6gm

    @George-kv6gm

    2 ай бұрын

    @@timmooney7528 Really cool! Thanks!

  • @HemlockRidge
    @HemlockRidge2 ай бұрын

    You need at least two aircraft carriers to be able to power project at any time. Having at least one in for maintenance at any given time is the reason. Also, China counts all of it's craft, including Patrol Boats, in their count. That makes them the largest navy in the world. China claims 730 "vessels". North Korea claims 519, for the same reason (mostly obsolete and noisy diesel submarines). The US Navy has 470, including the reserve fleet. Of these about 300 are battle force ships, with 280 ready for instant deployment. China has a battle force navy of about 170. North Korea is a big question mark, but certainly nowhere near these amounts. Canada has the advantage of being friendly neighbors with the strongest military in the world, and has lived under that umbrella since WWII. Canada has 34 commissioned vessels, with 12 being battle force. Now, the Australians have 50 commissioned vessels, with a battle force of 28. However, the Aussies are in a "build" mode and will be adding to that number (thank you China). Japan has 155 vessels, with 80 battle force. Japan is also converting at least one, maybe both, of their Helicopter Carriers, to accept the S/VTOL F-35B. Japan is also acquiring 12 new Frigates to add to their battle force. South Korea has 160 commissioned ships, with 80 battle force.

  • @pvdogs2
    @pvdogs22 ай бұрын

    I think you would enjoy Operation Yellow Ribbon with Tom Brokaw. It tells the little known story of how small town Gander Newfoundland came to the aid of about 6,000 passengers arriving on about 40 international flights that were grounded on 9-11 when US airspace was shut down.

  • @RockinMamaT

    @RockinMamaT

    2 ай бұрын

    There were actually 167 planes diverted to Canada's East coast and yes that story makes me beam with Canadian pride and makes me sad at the same time. What a terrible day that was 😢

  • @pvdogs2

    @pvdogs2

    2 ай бұрын

    @@RockinMamaT Yes, Transport Canada told NAV Canada not to direct any planes to Toronto, Ottawa or Montreal. So, they were all sent to either the East Coast or Vancouver. Halifax received the most flights but Vancouver received the most passengers (on fewer flights). I've never seen any documentation on Halifax or Vancouver.

  • @RockinMamaT

    @RockinMamaT

    2 ай бұрын

    @@pvdogs2 Interesting I'll have to look into what happened on the west coast. I'm assuming this story is more crazy because of the amount of people they had to take care of in such a small province

  • @darksydedigital
    @darksydedigital2 ай бұрын

    OH yes, the US military has TONS of testing grounds all over the place where they test this stuff. You have the area outside of Nellis AFB, you've got White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, among many others. Then with the Navy they will do much of their exercises and testing out at sea. So beyond computer modeling and testing like that, they do have at least in a large part physical testing locations all over the world. Also if you haven't checked it out there is some videos by the KZread channel The Fat Electrician that has some great military history videos where he goes through and breaks down this history similarly to how Mr. Ballin does his stories. My personal favorite is the one about the US Navy and the Barbary pirates.

  • @stephaniefoster1964

    @stephaniefoster1964

    2 ай бұрын

    Don't forget APG- Aberdeen Proving Ground_ which, the purpose of that installation is to 'prove' artillery and munitions.

  • @darksydedigital

    @darksydedigital

    2 ай бұрын

    @@stephaniefoster1964 Fair point. I had forgotten about that one.

  • @timothynevins3778
    @timothynevins37782 ай бұрын

    I served in the Army my wife served in the Air Force of the US

  • @BF3-4
    @BF3-42 ай бұрын

    If you don’t praise yourself, no one will, there are plenty of such videos in every country in the world 🥳

  • @dalejohnson2047
    @dalejohnson20472 ай бұрын

    And they didn’t even mention all the special forces soldiers from the seals to green berets force recon and probably some we don’t know about

  • @clifflogan7974
    @clifflogan79742 ай бұрын

    I would like to comment on the Boeing statement. The divisions that build military equipment is separate from commercial products. Generally a commercial corporation splits their company into a separatly governed entity under a defense contract. They share the same resources as their parent but have their own leadership and production facilities and standards. Especially with vehicles, miltary vehicles are not built in the same factories that build commercial products. There are also onsite military officials, usually, that reports on the quality of the products and are involved in the board meetings.

  • @Beekindalways-oj2cl
    @Beekindalways-oj2clАй бұрын

    Thank you for reacting to this older video from a US Veteran and Subscriber.🇺🇸

  • @annfrost3323
    @annfrost33232 ай бұрын

    The Stealth B-2 bomber does, in fact, get used. Starting in 1999 in Kosovo. In 2003 in Afghanistan and during the Iraki war. In 2011 they were used as part of a UN directed operation in Lybia, where they dropped 40 bombs having flown directly from the US to Lybia refuling on air four times. Prior to the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan in March 2011, they had considered an airtrike by B-2s as alternative using bunker busting bombs. This was rejected due to potential damage to nearby buildings. In 2017 two B-2 attacked an ISIS training camp in Lybia.

  • @rexracer3221
    @rexracer32212 ай бұрын

    "How the Universe is Way Bigger Than You Think" .... "The United States (USA) vs the World - Who Would Win? Military/Army Comparison" ... "How Geography Made The US Ridiculously OP" ... How US Became A Superpower" are all excellent videos for channels to react too.

  • @kylefam9356

    @kylefam9356

    Ай бұрын

    Agreed

  • @gkiferonhs
    @gkiferonhs2 ай бұрын

    The US Air Force is the largest air force in the world. The number two air force is he US Navy.

  • @Silky808

    @Silky808

    2 ай бұрын

    “Nothing can stop the U.S. Air Force!” Except “lightning within 5”.

  • @lancelavallee8487

    @lancelavallee8487

    2 ай бұрын

    Sorry, the US Navy air force is larger then the US Air Force. As an Navy Airman, I can tell you this is 100% true.

  • @Silky808

    @Silky808

    2 ай бұрын

    @@lancelavallee8487 lmao, sure semen. I’m an actual Airman in the air force and the Air Force is the largest in the world. The US Navy is not even the largest Navy in the world.

  • @deanbrunner261
    @deanbrunner2612 ай бұрын

    As a former jet mech all planes and equipment is inspected at a very regulated schedule.. Day and night

  • @leahmollytheblindcatnordee3586
    @leahmollytheblindcatnordee358624 күн бұрын

    Add in this: the personnel of the US is all volunteer, while many countries are conscript oriented, not sure of their percentage. We also are developing small drones to enable ground troops to be able to look at what is going on ahead of them & this technology is always in development. I think something else to think of, is that we have a pretty well armed civilian population and good neighbors to the north and good allies as well. Cyber security, is something I would think most counties are working on very heavily.

  • @ryderjohnson1293
    @ryderjohnson12932 ай бұрын

    Fat Electrician: Barbary Pirates...good stuff. It explains how this War Machine was created, and why.

  • @jamesford7182
    @jamesford7182Ай бұрын

    They missed the most potent weapon of the U.S. Marines. When the Marines show up it means we are fully committed. They are the tip of the spear. Your whole world will change once they get involved. Chesty Puller famously described being surrounded by the enemy as a "target rich environment."

  • @mycroft16
    @mycroft1629 күн бұрын

    There's a great video out there of a tour of a ballistic missile silo where they actually have the guests sit at the control consoles and go through the process of a launch where the President has authorized it. They have them authenticate the message with the decryption cards, enter the program in the message into the computer to program the missiles with their targets. Then they have to do the confirmations to launch and turn the keys and hit the button. The truly scary thing that is made very clear is that once the vehicle starts that launch process, it can not be stopped. It severs connection to the silo and is running on its own battery and computer. There is no abort button, no abort code, no self destruct. And it's crazy to see the person sitting in the chair have to process and deal with the immense weight of pushing that button knowing that.

  • @daveray44

    @daveray44

    15 күн бұрын

    Imagine me working with the real ones! As well, doing maintenance and programming on the missile itself!

  • @APOLLO-777BC
    @APOLLO-777BCАй бұрын

    Quote by Lockheed Martin Director Ben Rich right before passing away at the hospital in 1995 "We already have the means to travel among the stars…Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do...

  • @Elohssa23
    @Elohssa232 ай бұрын

    I see these videos often, and they highlight many of the same things. But I always remember the 16+ million veterans we have :)

  • @user-gh4hg1uf5f
    @user-gh4hg1uf5f2 ай бұрын

    Wish people would quit saying Boeing problems Boeing has more jets in the air than any other but Please remember they dont do the maintenance and upkeep of the older jets that are owned by company’s

  • @user-nr5ux7gr2g
    @user-nr5ux7gr2g2 ай бұрын

    Imagine being a radar operator seeing a blip the size of a bumblebee at 30 thousand feet moving at Mach speed

  • @jimgreen5788
    @jimgreen57882 ай бұрын

    Somehow I missed that you're Canadians until just now. After not getting beyond ON for decades, I finally went to Eastern Canada in '83, driving in via Maine to the Maritimes, including Newfoundland. Then, in '84, I drove to AK, via the Prairie Provinces, BC and the YT, taking a special trip to Tungsten, NWT, out of Watson Lake. The only places I've missed are the Labrador part of N&L, and now that NWT is divided, I've not seen Nunavut. As an American, I'm proud that, although we have the strength to cause global mayhem, we aren't a bully, as some nations we know. In case you don't recognize the names of either of the carrier classes, Ford is named after former President Gerald Ford, and the Nimitz was named for a WW2 American general.

  • @BlackRoseImmortal
    @BlackRoseImmortal2 ай бұрын

    There is a video here on KZread, the title is "RSA ANIMATE: Changing Education Paradigms" and even though it's been around awhile, it is still pretty accurate.

  • @user-kg4eb7nl5b
    @user-kg4eb7nl5b2 ай бұрын

    having the Independence Class Frigate in the video is counter productive to the point , as they were decommissioned after 10 years at $360 million 😁

  • @utcnc7mm
    @utcnc7mm2 ай бұрын

    You said the key words......Military Industrial Complex. President Eisenhower warned us about this in his farewell address to the nation

  • @seekermel3079

    @seekermel3079

    2 ай бұрын

    The original text of the speech said "Military-industrial-congressional complex". Bingo.

  • @FlyingTigress

    @FlyingTigress

    Ай бұрын

    Too often not mentioned was his concern about the 'government-science complex' - researchers adjusting their actions to (in effect) get government funding for their pet projects.

  • @jeffreyphipps1507
    @jeffreyphipps15072 ай бұрын

    MIL-SPEC is different than commercial. Also, what people don't realize is that commercial aircraft are typically 50 years old. They're supposed to be retired after 25 years, but the costs of maintenance vs buying new planes is substantial. When considering things happening in flight, you need to consider how few of these incidents result in a crash landing for an aircraft. More people die in car accidents in a year BY FAR than in commercial plane incidents.

  • @timmooney7528

    @timmooney7528

    2 ай бұрын

    That's one of the reasons why operating budgets and production contracts are pricey. You're not only buying the planes, but also the parts and labor to maintain them.

  • @russellfisher2853
    @russellfisher28532 ай бұрын

    Military building. Is constantly Checked throughout the process. Of any military projects.

  • @kevinpernod9336
    @kevinpernod9336Ай бұрын

    I'm an 18 year Air Force veteran from the 80's and 90's and I'm watching this for the first time with you all. I'll be honest this is really cool.

  • @mikeef747
    @mikeef7472 ай бұрын

    In many ways, the US & Canada are like siblings, sometimes they argue & disagree, but like brothers & sisters, they have each other's back. Since the 1950's they shared Air defenses for North America (NORAD), they have been allies in just about every war in the last 100 years, they are each other's biggest trading partners and have the longest demilitarized border in the world. I don't think many Canadians are concerned the US is going use their military against them. FYI - A lot of people don't know, but Canada was a part of the Manhattan Project. They contributed much of the main ingredient Uranium and helped with the extraction and production of plutonium and provided laboratories and researchers.

  • @brettberra673
    @brettberra6732 ай бұрын

    Great video, would love to see you guys watch another one on this topic. There’s a ton of really cool stuff and technology that this video left out.

  • @tinatovar7548
    @tinatovar7548Күн бұрын

    I agree with you nobody should be messing with anybody we should live in peace in encourage inspire love and take care of each other I don't know why we have to fight

  • @T-riter
    @T-riter2 ай бұрын

    Canada is part of our strength!! You should be very proud of the fact that Canadians stormed the beaches on D- Day right beside Americans. They were bad asses I’ve heard American veterans talk about how fierce the Canadian soldiers were and they were great Tank commanders. 🇺🇸🇨🇦this is why we love our Canadian cousins 💪

  • @docbradleydc

    @docbradleydc

    Ай бұрын

    Hell yes, Canadians are awesome and we have a great history fighting side by side. The French get a lot of undeserved crap from some Americans too.

  • @CDRhammond
    @CDRhammond2 ай бұрын

    I used to be one of those US naval aviators. Never got to fly the F-35C but I do have years of experience in the F-18E and F.

  • @beachside1
    @beachside12 ай бұрын

    Canada is our great neighbor. We stand together

  • @WarH
    @WarHАй бұрын

    I myself Was never in the military. My dad did three years in a navy 30 years and the army green beret special forces. This is why I have a big open heart the military I was an army brat. It’s almost like being in the military you guys are great.

  • @ESUSAMEX
    @ESUSAMEX2 ай бұрын

    The US has actually 20 carriers, but only 11 run on nuclear power. The yearly US defense budget is between $600 billion and $900 billion.

  • @scottromer8584
    @scottromer85842 ай бұрын

    The nice thing is we are Canada's military in a sense, USA would most certainly help defend Canada. Maybe not Justin Trudeau, but everyone else : )

  • @RockinMamaT

    @RockinMamaT

    2 ай бұрын

    Thanks Canadian here glad you got our backs but please put Justin on an iceberg somewhere way north never heard from again 😂😂

  • @2kenday

    @2kenday

    2 ай бұрын

    @@RockinMamaT We will take Trudeau, but you have to take the lying fascist tRump.

  • @wildbill7081

    @wildbill7081

    2 ай бұрын

    hahahaha love your comment

  • @wildbill7081

    @wildbill7081

    2 ай бұрын

    @@RockinMamaT love your comment also you made my day

  • @CaddyJim
    @CaddyJim2 ай бұрын

    You can do World military comparison or even US versus Canada military comparison

  • @mike28003
    @mike280032 ай бұрын

    The thing is the issues with the 737 is not necessarily boeing. Those airframes are normally old airframes that are constantly being flexed due to the pressurization(constntly being squeezed and stretched),metal fatigue is an evil with all airframes. Its just inevitable that stuff like that is going to happen, there is no way that every fatigued part is going to be found before it fails. The maintenance people can not physically check every component every day.

  • @dicer666
    @dicer666Ай бұрын

    Radar cross section of bumble bee. "Sir, I see Bumble Bee flying by us at Mach 2!"

  • @rumrunner5266
    @rumrunner526622 күн бұрын

    There is a current version of this subject on YT. Also there are several videos showing US versus other countries including the world.

  • @lancelavallee8487
    @lancelavallee84872 ай бұрын

    #6 US Veterans.

  • @USMCMachine
    @USMCMachineАй бұрын

    To correct what another person put. The first deployment was October 4th 2022. It’s nuclear powered so it doesn’t need to refuel for about 2 decades. It was finished in 2017 first mission was 2022. It is still the largest and most advanced warship in the world. This video was from 2017 and it’s only the fun stuff they want you to know about from 7 years ago. -wounded vet.

  • @nathanpark1058
    @nathanpark1058Ай бұрын

    Well, to quote Death Angel, it's because "The Dream, it calls for blood and we have not spilled enough."

  • @rlew49ers
    @rlew49ers2 ай бұрын

    Actually (just checked) in term of total warship the U.S. is 5th with 484, China is 1st with 730 warships, followed by Russia 598 then North Korean 519. Of course, more doesn't necessarily mean better or more efficient!!

  • @tripsixx5802

    @tripsixx5802

    2 ай бұрын

    However majority of the Chinese and Korean ships are repurposed crap the Russians sold or they ripped off 😂 ski jump carriers are a joke

  • @rlew49ers

    @rlew49ers

    2 ай бұрын

    @@tripsixx5802 Agree, just citing numbers. As stated more doesn't mean better or more efficient. Our Navy is the absolutely the best and most powerful. Next year the 2nd Gerald R. Ford class carrier will be launched John F. Kennedy, followed by the Enterprise & Doris Miller in 2028.

  • @tripsixx5802

    @tripsixx5802

    2 ай бұрын

    @@rlew49ers it’s a miracle this joke of an administration hasn’t gave them the plans to build one of ours lol they give them everything else so they don’t expose their dirt on them! Same with the Ukraine

  • @FlyingTigress

    @FlyingTigress

    Ай бұрын

    @@rlew49ers As I recall, a significant number of China's warships are essentially only a "brown water" navy.

  • @rlew49ers

    @rlew49ers

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@FlyingTigress Yes, you are correct! U.S. ships are more technically superior than any other nation. The power of the U.S. Navy is unmatched. I never stated that the other nations were better but had more ships... Russia now have fewer ships because of the war with Ukraine! America's war machine is awesome - don't mess with America!!!

  • @stephenfludd6296
    @stephenfludd62962 ай бұрын

    Check out anything by the fat electrician. Great history.

  • @loneranger668
    @loneranger6682 ай бұрын

    As far as testing keep in mind the U.S. military is constantly being challenged all over the world. Various aircrafts, missiles, drones, and other weapons have actually already been used; thus, they have been tested. Today, the U.S. is supplying Ukraine with a lot of these missiles, drones, and other weapons for them to use on the Russian military.

  • @timmooney7528

    @timmooney7528

    2 ай бұрын

    The US military machine is constantly upgrading as well. Several of the weapons platforms given to Ukraine are items the US aren't using or were going to decommission. Several of the ATACMS missiles were no longer in use because they were made in the 1990's. Canada had warehouses full of air to ground rockets made in the 60's and 70's, no longer in use by modern planes waiting to be dismantled.

  • @JimmieGarrard
    @JimmieGarrard2 ай бұрын

    This video barely scratched the surface about the military might of the United States.

  • @metalmark1214
    @metalmark12142 ай бұрын

    I'd like to see videos comparing sizes of planets, stars, and galaxies in the universe. I watched some of them and the will blow your mind.

  • @rickwiles8835
    @rickwiles88352 ай бұрын

    One problem the US military has is the cost of its military. The USA spends more on its military than the next ten largest militaries combined..

  • @nathanpark1058
    @nathanpark1058Ай бұрын

    What amazes me is that the B-2 Spirit has a wingspan of 53 yards, 3 yards wider than an American football field, but also only has a radar cross section of a bee. The aliens have been kind to us lol.

  • @bretttodd6470
    @bretttodd64702 ай бұрын

    I'm impresses by the Ginsu missle. It has no explosives but does have blades that pop out before hitting its target leaving no collateral damage in populated areas. It slices through a vehicle like butter and simply de-limbs its victims within. Wicked for sure.

  • @pasqualecavallaro6671
    @pasqualecavallaro6671Ай бұрын

    Yuma proving ground, tests all military equipment except ships. Also the proving ground in Nome Alaska is where all cold weather testing is done, also this is an old video, we now have Space Force, and Lazer weapons 2 are in use now mounted on ships. Also a lot of this technology has been battle tested in the Iraqi, and Afghanistan, wars, and also we sent our smart bombs and HIMARS launchers to the Ukraine to assist them, the stealth fighters and bombers were used in the Middle East, and also the drones, we are fully aware of our weapon systems capabilities.

  • @29_lets_go
    @29_lets_go2 ай бұрын

    I live on the border with Canada and we do everything together and also trained with them while in the US Marines. I party with them, eat with them, shop with them, go to sporting events with them, etc. #1 reason not to mess with Canada: USA is their best friend. (just not Trudeau)

  • @josephmcghee8887
    @josephmcghee88872 ай бұрын

    GPS guidance for missiles and aircraft can be spoofed, so GPS is now being backed up for verification of data by inertial navigation that does not use outside information and Ground Mapping Radar which compares the ground image with an internally stored map of the Earth terrain. And as more sophisticated sensors are added to military systems, more confirming and verifying data is provided to human operators to make the final decisions on weapons use or non-use.

  • @christineraffa-diggon
    @christineraffa-diggon23 күн бұрын

    San Diego. When you are in the presence of these vessels, Awe Struck! ❤

  • @user-iq5oj5pt7o
    @user-iq5oj5pt7o2 ай бұрын

    Being a fourth generation vet that also spent almost 20 years for DOD contractors, the quality controls are far past what is seen outside. The depth and detail, not to count the procedural contract requirements and testing. DOD contracting for military munitions and weapons are in a whole other level of quality. Oh you might want to checkout ( if you haven't yet ) Americans being attacked by the Russian mercenary group Wagner is the middle east. It will give you an idea of capabilities in real situations.

  • @ronbrooks6547
    @ronbrooks65477 күн бұрын

    They showed the 6 Satellites in the video. Cool 😎

  • @FlyingTigress
    @FlyingTigressАй бұрын

    And, now there's the Air Force's B-21 bomber that's an order of magnitude more stealthy than the B-2 @12:24 Unmentioned is, what's called, the CEP: Circular Error Probability, of the warheads is the radius around a designated set of coordinates at which the warhead will land 'within' at least 50% of the time. We're talking scores of meters (metres).

  • @WarH
    @WarHАй бұрын

    we’re in the process of doing a six generation aircraft jets. We also have more drones than anyone in the world military drones that is. We even have drones that can fill jets instead of putting a big tanker in the air. They have drones that can do it pretty cool.

  • @MatthewPettyST1300
    @MatthewPettyST13002 ай бұрын

    Those jet fighters at 1:44 are Russian Sukhoi Su-57's . Did I miss the change of focus not mentioning the change of country. It was meant to promote US Superiority , Not the latest state of the art of Russia.. The F-117 Nighthawk was retired from the U.S. Air Force (USAF) in 2008. Yet, unusually, the F-117 is still flown regularly, some sixteen years after being retired.

  • @Plastikdoom
    @Plastikdoom2 ай бұрын

    This video left out tons of things, but is overall correct, like others said it’s a good 2-3 years old by now. For the nuke part, our SLBM’s can carry up to 8 MIRVs per missile and they can each carry like 18-20 missiles per Boomer sub, the ones that can launch nukes, specifically the Ohio class are called boomers. They used to be be able to carry 24 missiles per sub, with up to 8 warheads per missile, before they were treaty limited, even the treaty limited ones can fit an entire nation, that’s one sub, can effectively remove a nation from war, of it came to it. The rest, like 4 of them. We turned in cruise missile boats, that carry a stupid amount of cruise missiles only, but those still have up to a 1000 NM range, depending on models they are carrying. Those can cripple a region of a nation during war, just one. And our spending is over 800 billion USD per year on defense budget, all this is public knowledge for anyone who doesn’t know, I’m giving away any secrets. For the one or two who might think that. And we have 600-1000 base’s overseas, depends on who you listen to, but the best list that was made, from unclassified material is over 800 bases….as to Carriers, we operate more carriers than the rest of the world combined. And the only nation that has all super carriers, aka, big carriers that are nuclear powered, and kore than 2 of them. Like France UK’s carriers are smaller and oil fired boiler, along with most other nations carriers, limits their range to 15000 km without refueling. Our Nimitz class don’t need to refuel for 20 years. The new class of which I think two are operating by now, have upped that needing 25 years before refueling the reactor’s. And we’ve used every weapon system listed here, on combat except our ICBM’s yes, we were bombing the taliban with the greatest and most capable bomber ever made, with the B-2, and JDAMS and cruise missiles, a wee bit overkill. But hey. It’s what we got to use. We also bombed ISIS with the F-22 and F-35. Once again we got them. May as well use em.

  • @mobilegamer8922
    @mobilegamer89222 ай бұрын

    This video is years old. You guys should react to the updated version. Surprisingly in only a few short years, the US military has gotten significantly more tech and numbers

  • @NerdyNanaSimulations
    @NerdyNanaSimulations2 ай бұрын

    The military complex is a closed circuit, basically no outside connections are allowed except in secure situations. Also they have their own power which is unaffected by the powergrid, and back up power as well. Now that doesn't mean it's not possible, it just makes it a lot harder to breach. Also they have backup so while a lot of it is being converted to drones, there are still men who can be on the ground, air, or sea when needed.

  • @robertdysonn
    @robertdysonn2 ай бұрын

    Our Navy is so advanced because much like you guys for us to project power. We must cross a giant ocean because we don’t have any interest in fighting Canadians or Mexicans, smiles. To be a world power isolated across two giant oceans requires a very advanced navy which nobody can match. Not only do we have to have naval power but we also have to be able to move our military to far away land very quickly.

  • @nevysadventuresllc9074
    @nevysadventuresllc907417 күн бұрын

    All the branches work together for cyber security but Army is or was in charge of it. Also our military technology the vast majority is insulated and hardened against EMP. We might go down but at most for an hour.

  • @jimmiegiboney2473
    @jimmiegiboney24732 ай бұрын

    23:33 Mark! 1.4K Thumbs Up + Mine! 👍 I just subscribed! You're welcome, and thanks! 😊 Notes: Another nice couple to add to the channel list. 😀 Your speculation and other remarks are smarter than some, by the way. 😊

  • @barsandbarbells2022

    @barsandbarbells2022

    2 ай бұрын

    Welcome & thank you!

  • @curtiss22
    @curtiss2227 күн бұрын

    In your comments at the end, you mentioned the US companies. Saying "Boeing ...door falls out". Just like the bad press of the tire falling off a Boeing plane during takeoff, mostly, not 100%, but due to the airlines maintenance facilities. United has a big on in Indianapolis. American Airlines in Tulsa. Both at the airports there. If I buy a Mercedes and 10 years later my tire falls off, well, it was replaced by a tire store in the past 10 years. Not Mercedes original equipment. Most planes are AT LEAST 10 years old.

  • @jeffreystanley7884
    @jeffreystanley7884Ай бұрын

    We have Lasers in use currently while also increasing their power. We also have 6th generation fighter jets in early production while developing 7th gen aircraft/drones with hypersonic stealth weapons also. They didnt mention that the US population is also very well armed and most understand how to use them. (Japanese didnt invade Mainland US in WWII because they said behind every blade of grass is a man with a gun) Our military is increasing in size and capability also. New Aircraft Carriers bigger and more capable then the Nimitz class are being built etc. Simple fact is that America love us or hate us have always come to the aid of freedom loving peoples and never once taken over after the war was won. We always turn the country back over to the people. We literally could have dominated the whole of Europe after WWII.

  • @kdavidson1386
    @kdavidson13862 ай бұрын

    I always love that the U.S. Air Force is the largest in the world. The 2nd largest Air Force in the world is the United States Navy. Just mind boggling to thing about.

  • @stephaniefoster1964

    @stephaniefoster1964

    2 ай бұрын

    IKR. I've always felt that the Air Force has the coolest planes and doesn't get nearly enough accolades for the arsenal it provides!

  • @mycroft16
    @mycroft1629 күн бұрын

    The thing not a lot of videos make clear, and many people don't really get, is that the US Navy is essentially the ONLY navy in the world capable of deep ocean operations. The majority of navies have only ever been built for local stuff, so they never really wander super far from land. But the US is separated on both sides by massive oceans, so our navy has to be able to operate anywhere on Earth, at a moments notice. It's the nature of the threats that any given country faces and their location relative to them that drive such development. So the US being so very well isolated from everything geographically has forced it to develop the ability to be able to deploy anywhere, any time, with as little hassle as can be managed.

  • @TomFurr-uc1hj
    @TomFurr-uc1hj2 ай бұрын

    You asked about the spending well that's why we have no health insurance and massive homelessness

  • @91GT347
    @91GT347Ай бұрын

    "The Fat Electrician" has great history and is an awesome storyteller. Funny dude

  • @BubbaBlackmon
    @BubbaBlackmon2 ай бұрын

    In the latest data[2023] the United states spends $916 billion per year on defense . That is more than the next 10 countries combined.

  • @Farmer_Dave
    @Farmer_Dave2 ай бұрын

    Yall should react to "The Fat Electrician" former US Army Medic. Who has been doing positive stories about the Military for 2 years. He tells it light hearted with comedy. You will learn you will laugh. Honestly any of his vids are worth the look. But may I recommend "Old Age and Treachery" or "Porportional, when America took out half of Iran's navy in 8 hours"

  • @BoydBrandson
    @BoydBrandson2 ай бұрын

    When I was in military I worked with both the American Army and the Marines though the Marines were more checked out.

  • @charlesdecker4841
    @charlesdecker484125 күн бұрын

    Well said brother and Simper Fi . ❤🇺🇸

  • @3101home
    @3101homeАй бұрын

    US military has a few dozen specialty tech smaller companies that build weapons. General Dynamics is one of the larger companies.

  • @HR-tl5mq
    @HR-tl5mq11 күн бұрын

    @20:00 - oh we test them, we use them, and they are extremely reliable 🤣

  • @user-sr5rd7lk8n
    @user-sr5rd7lk8n6 күн бұрын

    And God bless AMERICA

  • @kellydaly119
    @kellydaly1192 ай бұрын

    We actually have 20 carriers. 11 are super carriers the other 9 are operated by the Marines for VTOL plans and helicopters.

  • @ronnieplant1139
    @ronnieplant11392 ай бұрын

    They will never do away with boots on the ground.

  • @nevysadventuresllc9074
    @nevysadventuresllc907417 күн бұрын

    Our military equipment is battle tested in many places to ensure it meets our standards

  • @scottyray8004
    @scottyray80042 ай бұрын

    Combat Infantry Desert Storm Veteran. 1987-1991

  • @ohioridercinci2495
    @ohioridercinci24952 ай бұрын

    Even crazier to me..... Radar is tracking bumble bees?, What's next falling leaves

  • @kendallbrown1335
    @kendallbrown13352 ай бұрын

    Just think, we know we're far ahead of the world just based on the systems we know about. Imagine the things we've never even heard of.

Келесі