Most metaethics philosophers would agree that moral ''plurality'' is essentially impossible under the notion of moral objectivism. meaning that morals are objective abstractions to which human beings discover rather then invent.

I’m here half an hour before my exam 😫

@umarishtiaq5061

Ай бұрын

Here a few hours before mine 😂😂

Thanks so much Hannah - this really helped my understanding With Law and morality xx

I would argue that even in a pluralistic society law has the role of educating people and establishing boundaries of what that society stands for. Take for instance the paradox of tolerance, how tolerant should a tolerant liberal society should be in the face of religious extremism, things like child marriage and other thorny issues of society like freedom of speech, rights of different groups, etc, so if we cannot count on the law to resolve this issues then society will descent into chaos even further.

Thanks, this was so helpful. Will you be doing Law and society and Law and Justice videos too?

@learnlawwithhannah

Жыл бұрын

Yes at the end of next week. I’ll also do Law and Society 👊

please please please do more vids with a bit more depth!!!! 🙏🙏

@learnlawwithhannah

4 ай бұрын

More depth in what way? Are you studying A level Law?

@abdulmoqitazim5671

4 ай бұрын

@@learnlawwithhannah indeed I am and thank you for the reply. In depth I meant as in the content that an A* student has compared to others, a little on exam technique, and how to not waste time in the exam on lengthy explanations if shorter sentences get you the mark.

last second cramming