Larry Summers on the Potential Disruption from AI
Lawrence H. Summers, Former US Treasury Secretary and Steve Rattner, Willett Advisors CEO debate the consequences of AI adoption on highly qualified workers.
--------
Follow Bloomberg for business news & analysis, up-to-the-minute market data, features, profiles and more: www.bloomberg.com
Connect with us on...
Twitter: / business
Facebook: / bloombergbusiness
Instagram: / bloombergbusiness
Пікірлер: 14
Very well spoken, been a while since I heard a level headed point of view
ML/DL is a part of AI, but it isn't AI. A lot of these people can't see the difference. Can it carry out tasks and navigate through problems without human interaction.
IQ vs EQ good point !!!
Agree
Sounds like the useless talking heads are going to get replaced. Good stuff!
This is insanity at its best (or worse, depending on one's perspective). Take it as you wish, robots, metal, plastic, digital AI, AND humanoids are the worst ever trash created by crazy inventors, closely monitored and adapted by the military, big corporate conglomerates and the power hungry institutions, none of which have the interest of humanity at heart. This can only end either in the last breath of the human race and a robots star wars scenario or a big bang marking the end of life on Earth. Welcome to the age of trash technology.
Remember though it's just a buzz word like cloud. It's just programming. Nothing is really "Intelligent" about it if you didn't know. It's all programming, and algos with large training data nothing more. Buzz word.
Capitalism is disruption. Capitalism is about making a better product at a better price. AI is Capitalism. What we need is some Universal Guaranteed Income.
@brennanb3919
11 ай бұрын
No UBI.. Let Capitalism destroy its self and the socity..
@WorldIsWierd
11 ай бұрын
sounds like we need less people too
@Batman-vr6jp
11 ай бұрын
@@WorldIsWierdreplace humans with robots 🤖
@splashmt99
11 ай бұрын
@PatRisberg Yes. Arguably there is a downside to vast humanity having no productive work. But that is a different argument than that people will live in poverty because there are too few jobs. Literal poverty will not need to exist, but poverty of character, might.