Kubricks work is cold, perfect, technical, objectively beautiful, there is always a distance to the object in front of the camera. Tarkovsky is hypnotic, surreal, the object always feels close, it's like the movie is pouring right into your soul.

@CDB12345

2 жыл бұрын

You read my mind about them!

@andreavoigtlander1087

2 жыл бұрын

kubrick is hypnotic and surreal too

A film lecturer once said to me “Kubrick’s ‘2001’ is about outer space while Tarkovsky’s ‘Solaris’ is about inner space.”

@sricharan7829

3 жыл бұрын

About inner space 'brilliantly said'

@UltimateEnd0

3 жыл бұрын

I couldn't agree more.

@-MertArda

3 жыл бұрын

Excuse my stupidity may you explain me what did he mean by that?

@eyluluslu4559

3 жыл бұрын

@@-MertArda Kubrick'in 2001i uzay boşluğu hakkindayken Solaris'in insanin kendisinin ic boşluğu hakkinda olmasindan bahsetmis:)

@-MertArda

3 жыл бұрын

@@eyluluslu4559 ah innerspace derken o innerspaceden bahsettiğini anlayamamıştım teşekkür ederim !! :)

There is only one thing Kubrick and Tarkovsky have in common: being truly great directors.

@animekid2979

2 жыл бұрын

that's a fact!

@JulianCinefilo12

2 жыл бұрын

Genios!!!

@davidc5191

Жыл бұрын

Yes, but these scene comparisons seem rather forced to me. You can probably find scenes from these directors and ones from Marx Brothers movies that look similar as well. Maybe that's less about similarities between any two directors, and more a statement of the uniformity of style in film-making.

@xcesar4impx666

Жыл бұрын

AMEN !

@hopscotchoblivion7564

6 ай бұрын

THEY WERE ALSO KILLED BY FEDERAL AGENCIES..... COME AT ME GLOWIES

Kubrick: Technical perfection. Tarkovsky: Emotional perfection. Both directors are just legendary. Their work is so beautiful, this is why film is art.

@risitasfrance9020

Жыл бұрын

True 👍

@Tofu_va_Bien

Жыл бұрын

Barry Lyndon gives Tarkovsky a run for his money in the emotions department imo.

@chessverse6279

Жыл бұрын

@@Tofu_va_Bien try watching "Andrei Rublev"

@Tofu_va_Bien

Жыл бұрын

@@chessverse6279 One of my favourite films!

@bw3451

Жыл бұрын

@@Tofu_va_Bien more Paths of Glory imo

cold war between countries, artistic agreement between souls

@sethleoric2598

4 жыл бұрын

Both are paintings, one is a scene and another is a portrait... i think?

@kyleshiflet9952

4 жыл бұрын

That's so true slashpie

@olmomecene

3 жыл бұрын

They actually hated each other: in particular Tarkovskij was so unimpressed with 2001 that he likely made Solaris in response.

@Neuroneos

3 жыл бұрын

@@olmomecene That's a myth. Tarkosky didn't hear about 2001 until Solaris was done.

@olmomecene

3 жыл бұрын

@@NeuroneosI read an article about it... gonna have to dig more into this story.

in the end, the easiest way to describe these two geniuses is: 'Talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see.' - Arthur Schopenhauer

Kubrick is painting a picture. Tarkovsky is writing a poem.

@Galova

3 жыл бұрын

you have mistaken. Kubrick is TAKING a picture. that would be correct

@bigoudi07

3 жыл бұрын

Buster does the stunt.

@scipioafricanus5871

2 жыл бұрын

Tarkovskij is SCULPTING IN TIME.

@agesflow6815

2 жыл бұрын

Lynch is The Painter.

@paulgreengod

2 жыл бұрын

Green is cringing

Kubrick starts with a K, Tarkovsky starts with a T. That’s the best comparison I can make.

@cothinker680

3 жыл бұрын

If it was meant for joke then it was bad joke.

@de_mir

3 жыл бұрын

@@cothinker680 indeed it was a bad one. I was making fun of myself though.

@themoreyouknowfools4974

3 жыл бұрын

@@de_mir don't listen to him. I think it was great. 390 people thought it was funny. Nobody liked his.

@de_mir

3 жыл бұрын

@@themoreyouknowfools4974 bad jokes can sometimes make people giggle too )

@L3ONARDO07

3 жыл бұрын

@@cothinker680 i think the joke flew over your head tho

Kubrick - visual prose / Tarkovsky - visual poetry.

@Pantano63

5 жыл бұрын

Nicely put.

@user-fo3yt1jq6n

4 жыл бұрын

lol this is pretty accurate

@mynameisshephard2394

4 жыл бұрын

@Iván G I don't really agree as Spielberg haven't really done any kind of movies like their's, he just did his own but still, Spielberg is incredibly overrated compared to other current great directors There's Chris Nolan for example! he did not get a freaking Academy Award! Wes Anderson's visuals are amazingly beautiful and creative, David Fincher , Paul Thomas Anderson and the list goes on .. does not mean Spielberg is shit tho , he is great , but just saying , there are many others that deserved more than what he earned

@ravi26ishable

4 жыл бұрын

@@mynameisshephard2394 Spielberg is a thief!

@autystycznybudda5012

4 жыл бұрын

Hitchcock, Cameron, Carpenter, Tarantino, etc. (or mainstream cinema in general) - epic prose. Bergman, Tarkovsky or Yodorovsky - poetry. Kubrick is more like an essayist or an author of philosophical treatises.

that burning house scene....

@armensog87

5 жыл бұрын

Kubrick is soooo miles away from being even close to making a movie like Mirror lol he cant even compete with more accessible ones like Solaris or Stalker.

@IlSH2

5 жыл бұрын

yeah, so idiotic. There should be another video to match up with tarkowsky. Something like Shyamalan / tarkowski, there you have the same shitty quality

@jmarrangements688

5 жыл бұрын

@@IlSH2 Easy cobba, it's just some dude's opinion on yt, don't blow a gastket just because you love kubrick

@armensog87

5 жыл бұрын

lmao, Nashuel butthurt that he cant access the inaccessible to him. Pretentious is the most misused word on the planet. Every guy and your dog uses it when they wanna say that something is way smarter than they are

@kozhikkaalan

5 жыл бұрын

That scene is really something else. I saw it ten years ago and it's still fresh in my mind

Kubrick: Story Teller Tarkovsky: Poet

Kubrick directed your eye and chose what you were allowed to see. Tarkovsky gave you time and allowed you to look around his beautiful frames.

@SssagaBenches4U

3 жыл бұрын

I think this is the best explanation of what can be seen in this video.

@kuroneko9710

2 жыл бұрын

I am inclined to agree.

@andreavoigtlander1087

2 жыл бұрын

youre lying

@diocre7446

Жыл бұрын

I think James Cameron follow Tarkovsky style.

Kubrick kept only significant things in the frame, Tarkovsky made everything in the frame significant.

@thefebo8987

5 жыл бұрын

like it

@khinlop

5 жыл бұрын

Seems like Tarkovsky has a lot of small details in the picture while Kubric tends to put props in a clear space with deep meaning behind them.

@davidwood9718

5 жыл бұрын

Lingam Arusanthran like what huh? Give one example of tarkovsky making everything in the frame meaningful/significant

@itnas4367

5 жыл бұрын

@@davidwood9718 Yeah, I think these people are either off their rocker or haven't spent the time to understand how Kubrick took the ideal of visual symbolism and pushed it the maximum degree - the most cinema has ever seen. I can faithfully say that isn't the case w/ Tarkovsky

@FelixalPorto

5 жыл бұрын

Santiago Calogero what are you on about? You’re acting as if this is a comment against Kubrick. He’s just stating in which way they are different..

Very different film worlds: Kubrik is much more masculine and it is more about desire. Tarkowski is softer and more poetic. I love and adore them both

@Katya_Lastochka

4 жыл бұрын

Softness and poetry are masculine traits.

@felipegomez4769

4 жыл бұрын

@@Katya_Lastochka Tarkovsky is gay

@murmor6890

4 жыл бұрын

Definitley, from what I can think of Pasolini or Fellini would probably be the closest in emotional expression to Tarkovsky while Eisenstein would be someone I´d put into the Kubrick universe.

@AllNewYear

4 жыл бұрын

@@Katya_Lastochka No actually.

@AllNewYear

4 жыл бұрын

@@Katya_Lastochka Softness and poetry can be traits adapted by men but it is not in their innate nature.

"That's just like, your opinion, man." -The Dude, 1998

@hadiputraw8083

2 жыл бұрын

The big lebowski > every kubrick and tarkovsky did

@scipioafricanus5871

2 жыл бұрын

The Dude, during the Gulf War 1991.

@milkshake8602

2 жыл бұрын

@@hadiputraw8083 that is one hell of an unpopular opinion that I don't agree with but respect

@hitarthjoshi3198

3 ай бұрын

​@@hadiputraw8083😂 💯💯

Tarkovsky - makes me create more abstraction around my thoughts. Genius.

Kubrick's stuff is all sort of mechanical beauty. Tarkovsky's is more organic feeling.

@tomval2161

7 жыл бұрын

total agree

@futuropasado

7 жыл бұрын

Neither is better IMO. One is philosophy, poetic organic beauty and the other is the solid rock image, photographic and symbolism perfection. 2 different styles with rare genius and important that both were trying to show the flaws of our world and the human spirit through film, art is about that in a way. They make you think like very few directors.

@NourRodriguez

7 жыл бұрын

great said couldn't agree more

@caiojulioary

7 жыл бұрын

But Andrei's organicity mustn't be confused with lack of tecnic precision. look at 1:14 for exemple

@futuropasado

7 жыл бұрын

Why is that

I believe that Kubrick was always the master of making the subjective seem objective, whereas Tarkovsky was the master of making the objective seem subjective. I think this video captures those traits well.

@FranciscoCastro-os6yy

7 жыл бұрын

Bergman said he wanted his films to make life look like a dream, and that not him, but Tarkovsky achieved that. In the Sacrifice, the dream becomes literal, or actually hallucination, from the point Alexander falls asleep, preceded by a clear hallucination when the boy hits him in the head.

@futuropasado

7 жыл бұрын

indeed

@beqirfetahi8568

7 жыл бұрын

wow...

@joeypropeller

7 жыл бұрын

interesting. i'm still trying to process that.

@S2Cents

7 жыл бұрын

Enzo Vieira Hmmm something to chew on, appreciate it.

Please, for the love of god, stop making this a “Kubrick vs Tarkovsky” that’s not what this is. This is a depiction and comparison of 2 beautiful art styles. There are no winners or losers. There is only beauty.

@Neocleese

4 жыл бұрын

Totally agree. It is unfair to compare the two artists.

@seanludwick7141

4 жыл бұрын

@Nemo Dayman I am fine with comments that say "Kubrick/Tarkovsky" it bothers me when people make comments about "Kubrick vs Tarkovsky"

@alexandrumircea

4 жыл бұрын

This should be pinned up

@derstahlmann

4 жыл бұрын

Kubrik is meh

@derstahlmann

4 жыл бұрын

@Jeremy Kirkpatrick No. It's a fight for erasing mediocore art that pretends it has any merit or value. American culture has already destroyed so much...

Tarkovsky - Time Kubrick - Space

@freebird1721

3 жыл бұрын

Nolan: Space travel and reversed time

@mr.suki2425

3 жыл бұрын

@@freebird1721 Nolan: Space-time

@XanAxDdu

3 жыл бұрын

nolan è un tarzanello dei nostri tempi il più raffinato quanto il più ridondante bravissimo ma senza una generazione di riferimento, senza né spazio né tempo

@wowp1184

3 жыл бұрын

@@freebird1721 Nolan - shit

@bar1825

3 жыл бұрын

@@wowp1184 you- bullshit

Genius\Genius

@peterkelnerxd7009

3 жыл бұрын

NO !!! Kubrick - Talent Tarkovsky - Genius

@riatorex8722

3 жыл бұрын

Yup! Sums up those two perfectly

I cried while watching this. Seeing Paths of Glory and Andrei Rublev side by side with this beautiful music truly struck me. Thank you so much for this.

Kubrik is the left part of the brain, the one devoted to logic, order and harmony. Tarkovsky is the right part of the brain, devoted to beauty, meaning and emotion. That being said, I feel Tarkovsky much closer to my own sensitivity. I still admire Kubrik's work, but it doesn't touch my emotional sphere nearly as much as Tarkovsky does.

@canti7951

3 жыл бұрын

Watch Paths of Glory. I'd say both directors make use of both. It's the style that differs.

@thomheetebrij8694

3 жыл бұрын

HahHaha how dare you to oversimplify their work hahahah😂😂😂 people please stop commenting on KZread video’s and try to watch cinema without analysing everything or putting it into words. The enormous amount of beauty these directors combine in their films is beyond words.😂😂😂😂

@manny6403

3 жыл бұрын

Dude, that's exactly that I wanted to write, but you did it better

@luke9947

3 жыл бұрын

@@thomheetebrij8694 i know right

@O-revisor

3 жыл бұрын

Could you elaborate more on why you think is that?

Возникает такое чувство, что Тарковского на западе знают лучше чем на родине.

@JanPBtest

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting.

@Martynoff.mi.

4 жыл бұрын

Так и есть

@shupimumi8482

4 жыл бұрын

Как и Сокурова

@threecuckooswithabow

4 жыл бұрын

А теперь ещё и Звягинцева.

@user-iy9uk3rm1o

4 жыл бұрын

Хаха, похоже на то

My eyes kept slipping on tarkovsky's side

@victortisme

7 жыл бұрын

The exact opposite happened to me! =O

@chris-sv4kz

7 жыл бұрын

to me as well ;)

@jimbones1916

7 жыл бұрын

Antonio Tugucci cuz it was wider

@S2Cents

7 жыл бұрын

Antonio Tugucci Probably because it was on the right side and/or the imagery is less familiar than Kubrick and also maybe because the music fits much better with Tarkovsky. Also Tarkovsky seems to be what people wanting to be sophisticated are into a bit more...tbh.

@Lions4322

7 жыл бұрын

Agree with all but the last part. That seems more like guessing than anything.

For me, it looks like Kubrick makes life into art and Tarkovsky makes art into life

@anonymousonlineuser6543

4 жыл бұрын

And you make everything into rehearsed bullshit.

@pisox2849

4 жыл бұрын

@@anonymousonlineuser6543 ahahhahaha

The Tarkovsky shot from Andrei Rublev with Andrei in the ruined chapel makes me want to die. I think it's one of the most beautiful things I've ever seen.

The power of Cinema

I have always felt that Kubrick showed us fantastic photography while Tarkovsky made us walk through paintings.

@gabrieldinizdemoraes

5 жыл бұрын

Remember Barry Lyndon

@shotbro4998

5 жыл бұрын

Gladayo ? U mean that one movie?

@shotbro4998

5 жыл бұрын

Sauce Money Barry Lyndon vs 8 Tchaikovsky’s movies... that’s a little unfair, Kubrick stands no chance in such a matchup.

@felipegomez4769

4 жыл бұрын

@@shotbro4998i think eyes wide shut has it .its not so obvious cause the story occurs in 1999, clockwork orange can also feel like watching a painting even though its technically science fiction

@nathanaelmeirsschaut4253

4 жыл бұрын

Very nice to forget Forman, Coppola, Scorsese, Godard, Bergman, Welles, Tarantino, Spielberg, Hitchcock, Lynch, Fincher, Eastwood, Nolan, Leone, Villeneuve, Allen, Lang, PTA, Kar-Wai; Miyazaki, Bong Joon-Ho... very nice... cinéma is an art and love it in all his form and vision of some many artist

In russian we have saying: "Don't confuse warm with soft".

@andreychuvashlov7206

4 жыл бұрын

Не понял😂

@luleshege8205

4 жыл бұрын

Да-да или смешать кислое с пресным

@EstelBerlin13

4 жыл бұрын

@@luleshege8205 нет, не путай кислое с теплым

@govegan6682

4 жыл бұрын

@@luleshege8205 pse ke emrin lule shege dhe shkrun ne rusisht?

@luleshege8205

4 жыл бұрын

@@govegan6682 а что?

Kubrick: Intellectual Order Tarkovsky: Emotional Chaos

@kevzsabz8253

4 жыл бұрын

I like your comment you are actually right.

@gartenstuhl2396

4 жыл бұрын

That is very much on point. Thank you.

@andyisdead

4 жыл бұрын

No. Stop oversimplifying.

@BrownieWithCaramel

3 жыл бұрын

Kubrick: Intellectual Chaos Tarkovsky: Emotional Order

@lurker6918

3 жыл бұрын

@@andyisdead All these comments are annoying me lol. They keep oversimplyfing them as opposites. They all go something like: this/that, black/white, up/down.

I saw '2001' as a boy at a drive-in. I first found Tarkovsky in 2014. My 2 favorite film makers. Thanks for posting!

Kubrick made Kubrick films and Tarkovsky made Tarkovsky films. I am in awe of both of them. That said, I don't see the point of either director's fans claiming one was better than the other. It's like saying you have proof that Beethoven was better than Bach. It's Art and Creativity we're looking at, not a competitive event with stopwatches and tape measures which can show, without question, who is better. I mean, you can probably measure who did the fastest or loudest performance of Hamlet, but the best?

@L3ONARDO07

7 жыл бұрын

TheStockwell Because they're insecure about their own opinions. They do it as self reassurance.

@TheStockwell

7 жыл бұрын

. . . and that's why I don't get involved in the ongoing debate regarding who was greater: Frank Sinatra or Freddie Mercury.

@kyletomlinson5365

7 жыл бұрын

how have I seen your comments in so many random places?

@TheStockwell

7 жыл бұрын

I'm interested in a lot of things, that's about it. Except sports. Other than the Olympics, team sports are my Kryptonite. Also, KZread has some pretty interesting things on it, once you ignore what's trending and most of the goofy things KZread recommends. My daily workout goes like this: I sign in and do searches using two phrases: "Klimt, today" and "Kubrick, today." The door then magically opens to everything from people trying to write the missing fugue in Bach's "Art of the Fugue" to vintage Talking Heads videos. It's the comments that are the best. You can watch people getting into fistfights over the existence of a Supreme Being AND whether Mahler's tenth symphony should be completed by scholars. On KZread, you can be an expert - and a moron . . . at the same time! Have a great week, wherever you're having it. :)

@TheStockwell

6 жыл бұрын

Thank you. Reasonable comments on KZread - you don't see THOSE very often! Once you get past the "He's the greatest of all time and everyone else is a loser!" frame of mind, you wind up having discussions, not pointless and endless arguments. I have my Queen CDs on the same shelf as my Sinatra CDs. Which is better and "the greatest"? Whoever I just listened to. If nothing else, this video made me decide I need to save up and buy Tarkovsky's films -on Blu-ray. And when I do, they'll go on the shelf next to my Kubrick Blu-ray discs. :D

I never though that I would feel an equal genius to Kubrick in filmmaking, but when I saw especially The Mirror, Stalker and Andrei Rublev I really put Tarkovsky up there in the heaven of genius artists.

Everyone in the comments, summarized: Kubrick is Blank. Tarkovsky is Opposite Blank.

@Dr._Atom

4 жыл бұрын

No one ever said that lol, stop making things up

@sjaakkielzog314

4 жыл бұрын

@@Dr._Atom gyazo.com/873f14529279da6bb11aa435f69b027f ; "Kubrick kept only significant things in the frame, Tarkovsky made everything in the frame significant. "; "For me, it looks like Kubrick makes life into art and Tarkovsky makes art into life"; "Kubrick - visual prose / Tarkovsky - visual poetry."; "Kubrick kept only significant things in the frame, Tarkovsky made everything in the frame significant."; "West/ East - both beautiful"

@dawsondjodvorj2408

4 жыл бұрын

Kubrick wins over Tarkovsky any day.

@Gabriel-re6sw

4 жыл бұрын

Dawson Djodvorj if you still think this video is trying to make it seem that one is better than another. This the point is being missed. Yeah it’s all up to perspective and opinion but I doubt that Kubrick and Tarkovsky would dislike each other. They both have very distinct unique styles. It’s a shame tarkovsky died so young due to the filming of stalker

@withnail-and-i

3 жыл бұрын

@@Gabriel-re6sw Tarkovsky dismissed 2001

Andrej Roeblev, the best movie ever. I can't get enough of all those scenes that go under your skin, it is a spiritual event. I can see it over and over again.

West/ East both beautiful

@youtubesuckmydick

5 жыл бұрын

It's true...

@user-dn1kp9gg9x

4 жыл бұрын

@@youtubesuckmydick даб даб да я да.

@kyleshiflet9952

4 жыл бұрын

Men from other countries who never met were cut from the same cloth a love cinema and are now are the Kings of their professions

@tbv7447

3 жыл бұрын

@@youtubesuckmydick ты типо эстет да? А я так не думаю! Ты просто позер! Школтник, тььфу! Дрянь!

@iamBIGBROOX

3 жыл бұрын

Sunrise and sunset

The Holy Trinity of Cinema Kubrick - The Father Kurosawa - The Son Tarkovsky - The Holy Spirit

@christophermccracken4296

6 жыл бұрын

How bout Bergman - The Father Kubrick - The Son Tarkovsky - The Holy Spirit

@emt3417

6 жыл бұрын

I really like Bergman, but I think he did enough to stand alone without being part of the "Trinity." Maybe I like him too much?

@stakt6931

6 жыл бұрын

Christopher McCracken Brett Ratner - The Father Uwe Boll - The Son M. Night Shyamalan - The Holy Spirit

@grandbluepianistofthesky9469

6 жыл бұрын

Jordan Bolaños Don't know about Ed Wood.

@grandbluepianistofthesky9469

6 жыл бұрын

No.... Stanley Kubrick - The Father David Lynch - The Son Andrei Tarkovsky- The Holy Spirit.

Everything Tarkovsky has done looks incredibly timeless, it could just aswell had been released today

"Take music, for instance. Less than anything else, it is connected to reality, or if connected at all, it’s done mechanically, not by way of ideas, just by a sheer sound, devoid of… any associations. And yet, music, as if by some miracle, gets through to our heart. What is it that resonates in us in response to noise brought to harmony, making it the source of the greatest delight which stuns us and brings us together?" --- Stalker (1979) There is no denying that Kubrick and Tarkovsky's art is mesmerizing in their own way. While you enjoy this, do not forget the music playing. "On the nature of daylight" by Max Richter is an epitome of how sound influences cinema. So minimalistic yet so melancholy and moving.

@fantasticnisopta

2 жыл бұрын

Music is disconnected from reality? Bullshit.

Thank you for this. Is incredible how much meaning they could convey with their images.

I don't like to compare this two great artist. And the music is on Tarkovski's favor. But this video is not a VS. one, it only shows the parallelisms present in their works. I really liked it.

@saltalgilmour9745

4 жыл бұрын

I agree why put one vs the other? just enjoy both works!!

@stupididiot6993

4 жыл бұрын

Sal Talgilmour the video was really just showing both of their work, and then people just decided to debate like children

Tarkovsky........ What a framing, what a visual. Heart soothing

An Intellectual and a Poet, two completely different yet equally beautiful sides of cinema. Two Masters of their craft, RIP, both Kubrick & Tarkovsky made the world a better place with their art.

Tarkovskys images is so perfect... in not a huge fan of the movies but they're beautiful!

@TimoteoCirkla

5 жыл бұрын

This is the merit of cameramen.

@manjunathprasadcv3332

4 жыл бұрын

@@TimoteoCirkla nah...director is the one who sets the shots and the frames...cinematographer is fully eligible to take the credit on lighting department... But not on those beautiful art like images...

@giothemath

4 жыл бұрын

Blasphemy

Tarkovsky's scenes are hypnotizing, you can't deny other directors talent nor art, but tarkovsky is the king of cinematic.

@altunuzwwiiraidreplaysrobl4129

4 жыл бұрын

No way

@stephenalbin6723

4 жыл бұрын

Not when KUBRIK is in conversation

@thetruestrepairman7423

3 жыл бұрын

When Bergman says you are the best, you probably are

@juanucedaperez9614

3 жыл бұрын

@@thetruestrepairman7423 He said he was the GREATEST between them (Tarkovsky, Kurosawa, Buñuel, Fellini, Bergman himself)... but not the BEST.

@thetruestrepairman7423

3 жыл бұрын

@@juanucedaperez9614 yes he did, but he also said "Tarkovsky is for me the greatest, the one who invented a new language, true to the nature of film, as it captures life as a reflection, life as a dream." So...

*I am extremely grateful for both of these geniuses, I wish we had more directors like these two*

@user-iy9uk3rm1o

Жыл бұрын

There are lots of them. Trier or Bergman for example

@yusufyusuf7913

4 ай бұрын

Bergman, bela tarr, terrence malick, Martin scorsese,Charlie chaplin, godard, carl theodor, theo angelopoulos, nuri bilge, lars, fellini, akira kurasowa,hitchcock, Paul Thomas anderson , David lynch,peter greenaway, orson welles , mizoguchi, ozu, buster keaton , John cassavets , abbaye kariostami , kieslowski, wong kar wai .... enough?

Both directors are representative of a master class in film and cinematography. Really goes to show how great cinema and technique transcend time. Truly classic works.

i always think: 2001 reached a new border in the meaning of human's life in universe, and solaris - a new border inside human's itself

@maurocruz1824

5 жыл бұрын

mrhoapro1 The so called 'two cultures'. I prefer to explore the first one.

@rafatowers

5 жыл бұрын

Perfect, agree

@marionow6227

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed

@emiliawitczak9063

4 жыл бұрын

It's worth mentioning that Solaris was based on the book with the same name, which was written by Stanislaw Lem in 1961(!). Not that it change anything.. just an interesting fact

@sethleoric2598

4 жыл бұрын

"Humanity doesn't need the cosmos, it needs a mirror"

I think the biggest differences between the two filmmakers was that Kubricks shots were an emotionless and observational form, whereas Tarkovsky went with more involvement in the scene. Tarkovsky´s views were the most active and expressed a form of emotion, but the cold and cynical standpoint Kubrick used in his pictures expressed a darker form of filmmaking. I think this is why Kubrick gets the darker subjects in his movies so well, because he eradicates the feelings in his way of filming. Even though Kubrick is my favorite filmmaker, they both mastered their own themes in their films.

@vanbeet5105

7 жыл бұрын

very true ,i think kubrick was kinda a more technically oriented filmmaker while tarkovsky was a painter ,he could paint life on a screen using images and therefore his movies evoke more emotions .some of kubricks films can even be described as cold and distant emotionally

@Heisenberg882

6 жыл бұрын

I don't​ think his films don't have emotion, i think he experiences emotion a different way

@saltalgilmour9745

4 жыл бұрын

@@vanbeet5105 "some of kubricks films can even be described as cold and distant emotionally" that shows you dont understand Kubrick.... re watch his movies buy the books maybe it helps to understand them... a hint he was a fotoreporter...

@lamestudiosinc418

4 жыл бұрын

All I'll say is that 2001 made me cry about the death of an AWOL robot.

@juanucedaperez9614

3 жыл бұрын

@@Heisenberg882 You are right!!!!!

I come back to this video every so often. I still dont know who i prefer.

MUSIC: "ON THE NATURE OF DAYLIGHT" BY MAX RITCHER

@threecuckooswithabow

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@suvechhabose7586

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you ♥️✨🙌🏻

@venkateshk4491

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you

Как же здорово быть частью искусства , особенно настоящее искусства .. )

Great combinations. I've seen all of Kubrick's, but just watched "Stalker", and was blown away. I can't wait to check out his other films.

@karambirantil8141

3 жыл бұрын

Watch Andrei Rublev

@icheckedavailability

3 жыл бұрын

Mirror is pure beauty

@tanujbirdi7812

3 жыл бұрын

very true

@user-og6hl6lv7p

3 жыл бұрын

I say this with no negativity intended, but Stalker ruined my perception of film; nothing compares to it.

@amaysharma5408

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-og6hl6lv7p indeed, stalker feels like watching a nightmare from open eyes of some far distant dystopian world with a high fever

Its truly a gift to be alive and able to appreciate these behemoths of cinema and their works

@paulgreengod

2 жыл бұрын

Behemoth lmao

1:53 This boy character's fade to black is the one of the most amazing things in cinema I ever see...

@alexq1108

3 жыл бұрын

This is also most psychedelic and trippy movie about a war i ever see..

@victorsilveira1028

3 жыл бұрын

What's is the name?

@Z0MBIEB0YZ

3 жыл бұрын

@@victorsilveira1028 Ivan’s Childhood (1962)

With that music, almost anything can seem genius.

@flamingoseatshrimps1361

3 жыл бұрын

Not really, if you put Cool Cat Saves the Kids in there with that background music, it'll just be hilarious.

@luisfrancabandiera7572

2 жыл бұрын

Watch the video on mute, the images speak for themselves.

@lindacowles756

2 жыл бұрын

Where are the 3 replies?

2 of my favorite directors with music by one of my favorite composers.

@user-he4cy7xx4d

4 жыл бұрын

tell me the melody that plays in the background please

Both for me, capture the distance, the endlessness, closeness, unreachable, exciting, and unexplainable longing of life. Both expected so much from themselves as artists and both reward repeated viewers in ways only high art can deliver. They are the Twains, the Tolstoys of their medium.

USA had Kubrick,URSS had Traikovsky and we had two of the best directors of all time.

@vinceblanz5917

7 ай бұрын

Tarskovsky hated ussr

@dynaaOwO

7 ай бұрын

​@@vinceblanz5917говорю тебе как русский, ты ошибаешься

@AgelessPhoton

3 ай бұрын

UK had Kubrick 😊

Love this, Tarkovsky is my favourite filmmaker, his work is visual poetry, so rich in depth, texture and nuance that it truly effects me every time I watch his films.

I think both are legendary directors that won't ever be forgotten.

I love these directors so much. Both are very different but both are the best.

Been seeing Max Richter's music pop up on these kinds of videos lately. He's such a genius and his music complements Kubrick and Tarkovsky's visual virtuosity so well

1:08 what a brilliant fucking shot from Tarkovsky

tarkovsky existential genius, kubrick comercial

Tarkovsky's color correction is something unique. only he knew how to show dull colors so rich and expressive.

I haven't watched all of their movies, but this montage stroke my heart.

I think this goes for all of their respective works, but nowhere is it more clear than in the distinction between Kubrick's 2001: A Space Oddysey and Tarkovsky's Solaris. Kubrick's work is art attempting to transcend what makes us human, whereas in Tarkovsky's work, our authentic selves are ever present. In 2001's ending, the main character triumphantly moves beyond the human condition, while in Solaris, both the incomprehensible planet and the derelict space station orbiting are used as evidence that, no matter how far we've come, or how far we go, we bring our humanity with us.

Bergman on Tarkovsky: "Tarkovsky is for me the greatest, the one who invented a new language, true to the nature of film, as it captures life as a reflection, life as a dream".

@juanucedaperez9614

3 жыл бұрын

Bergman on John Ford: He is the best director in the world...

Tarkovsky is on his own level. For sheer force of creative vision I don’t know anyone as capable.

These two man has reached a level that no one could possibly imagine in cinematics.

Happy birthday, Mr. Kubrick! He would've only been 89 if he were alive today...

Seen Solaris aswel now,both stalker and Solaris are a masterpiece.ive bought his other 5. I know I will like them.i love the pace of his films( other films seem to fast and watered down now I've seen these. the silence of them,the sounds of water,creaks,fire, is so calming.i also like the Russian language.cant wait to watch the other 5. I like watching them on my own.just an amazing experience so far.im not an 'arty' person either.but I know quality when I see or hear it.before I watched them I flicked through videos and thought they looked boring.now I understand them,it's not a gimmick,so far I'm amazed by them.there long but I'm never bored and don't want them to finish.the journey of these films is the experience for me,not the arrival.glad I've found these

I appreciate the work you must have done to find similar shots. What a treat for fans of these two great directors!

Ivan’s Childhood, Tarkovsky’s first film is one of the most raw depictions of the true Soviet experience of WW2

@TheButterMinecart1

3 жыл бұрын

Don't forget Come and See.

@rusitoexplorador

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheButterMinecart1 Come and see is an excellent movie but extremely hard to watch. Reality can be awful and we cant forget that awfulness. It is free on KZread

@ML-xp1kp

2 жыл бұрын

@@rusitoexplorador one thing about come and see is that to non-Russian speakers, it can be complete nonsense. I can't picture what it would be like to view it from an English monolingual perspective, but the way the scenes change, the way the drama is displayed, the camerawork, and the psychedelic nature of the film probably make it seem like some senseless melodramatic montage to people who aren't fluent in its language. Picture a non-English speaker listening to late Bob Dylan. The voice perfectly fits the music and we wouldn't have it any other way, but to someone who doesn't understand English it would likely sound like a lawnmower playing over a guitar track.

@samscopeproductionz

2 жыл бұрын

@Stringer bell different kind of film, Come and See is an excellent depiction of the sickening brutality of war, but relies mostly on shock value and scarring the viewer into remembering it, still a great film but other films (Schindler’s list) do it better. Ivan’s Childhood depicts it from the perspective of someone who doesn’t really understand what is happening and thus it makes it much more authentic and chilling to watch because the audience is in the same shoes as the characters. You want to watch war at its worst? Watch come and see You want to try and come to grips with understanding what it was like experiencing it? Watch Ivan’s childhood

Brilliantly done! You just let the pictures say it all. I find Kubrick more scientific, philosophical, intelectual, and Tarkovsky is so more methapysical, artistic and emotional. They are both so deep in there movies and scenes, but I find that in the Kubricks movies man of a gruops of people are basicly so alone, violent, bored, desperate and hopeless. In the Tarkovsky's film there is always someone, or something near the man or the group, people are never alone, there is always someone ore something to comfort them. So, for me, Kubrick is a deep analysis of the mind, and Tarkovsky is a profound meditaion of the heart.

I'm addicted to Kubrick's style of filmmaking; his films are almost void of human life/emotion, I love how it's presented with ravishing stills and breathtaking tracking shots, he also integrates the shadow of humanity better than anyone who ever did it.

@grandbluepianistofthesky9469

6 жыл бұрын

Gene Berrocal That's what I like about him.

Pure awesomeness right here two great influences on my career I’ll never be able to match it but how lucky we are to have these filmmakers and their films

I seriously think that this video, out of all the videos I’ve seen, that this is the best one I’ve ever seen on KZread. No joke, this video is just perfect and beautiful.

Stanley Kubrick he shows us the duality of mankind how were always fighting over something while Andrie Tokovsky shows us the beauty to mankind how we can always admire lives beauty now this my interpretation of my two favorite directors

Thank you for this beautiful video. Kubric shows a picture that can you feel, Tarkovsky makes you feel directly, he gives pure and strong emotions, I found more soul in his movies. Both masters are great and deep, but Tarkovsky is closer to my feelings.

A beautiful presentation. Excellent choices of images to pair.

My two favorite movie directors! Thanks for this beautiful video!

Always and forever Tarkovsky 🌹

I don't know what it is but Tarkovsky's frames are always so aesthetically pleasing. For example, the burning house scene, the characters are positiones just right to make you feel. What you are feeling is unknown, but the emotions are undeniable. Tarkovsky also lets you wander inspide his frames. They seem paintings. Now with Kubrick there is more tension in each frame; things seem more wound up, almost neurotic and precise. The direction is a lot more clearer. You don' get lost much and if you do, you find your way back to the point. They are both great, but in their own way.

@MedhatithiGuha

Жыл бұрын

Such nicely said... i remember that in Stalker there is a scene where we are being shown a lake (in black & white) which is basically surrounded by industrial garbages all around when you look closely at it but the feeling you get while watching the movie is something heavenly.. I just cannot imagine how someone with a movie camera and limited editing capabilities can do such magic on frames

@MedhatithiGuha

Жыл бұрын

Like honestly I am not much aligned to the themes and concepts which Tarkovsky depicted through his movies but still he remains my favourite director of all times probably just because of the aesthetic & emotional factor you mentioned

both wonderful directors who made some of the most visually stunning films of all time📽🎬

Thank you! The Odyssey / Solaris was so much needed!

Stunning images

Kubrick was a technician, Tarkovsky was a poet

@saltalgilmour9745

4 жыл бұрын

wrong! Kubrick was a poet too! he just didnt like to film same things /meaning over and over again ( I think he was one that was getting bored very easily)he always wanted to change and challenge himself with new movies/ideas he (re)invented many topics/genre in his movies..

@xplosionslite6439

4 жыл бұрын

Funny that this should be taken only one way. I'm currently reading The Expanse series, a practical look at near future space habitation, and it's introduced me to many scenarios where calling someone a poet would be a way of politely designating them a well-natured dreamy figure of insignifance. It's technicians who solve problems and save lives when we have to rely on technology, without credit or any kind of personal catharsis at the end of it. Nothing specific to Kubrick or Tarkovsky, but just a general inversion to consider.

@federicofellini8136

4 жыл бұрын

Shame on you

@xplosionslite6439

4 жыл бұрын

@Great Destroyer Fun thing, that's only your opinion and you can't categorically say technicians don't solve problems, especially when I specifically mentioned ones "involving technology." It's a point of view to consider, unlike your assertion of fact here. Your "problems of the soul" won't matter one bit when psychical needs aren't taken care of. I also at no point claimed technicians did help with those kinds of problems. One is no more important than the other, though certain people prefer the idea of one over the other.

@xplosionslite6439

4 жыл бұрын

@Great Destroyer Hey thanks for the civil reply. I appreciate the arguments you're making for problems of the soul. I just meant to tackle _how_ important both kinds of problems were, where you were arguing _why_ your preferred kind are important. That's why the critique of your technique. Tbh, I have no problem with most of what you've said, just the first part where you said, "that's not true." If you look at my first post, I never asserted something as true, just offered an alternate viewpoint.

It so beatiful, this is a real art, I'm crying

Beautiful imagery and music. Thank you.

I would say Tarkovskij's movies are maybe the most involved I've ever seen.

Such beauty. Gives me a reason to pursue films.Thank you for this video.

This is so beautiful. It's like i can feel my soul vibrating.

Thank you this video. It is beautifully done and the music is perfect. A tribute to the talent and poetry of both directors.

A lot of people asking who's the best one. I got something to tell you: There👏 Isn't👏 A👏 Better👏 Director👏 Because👏 Each👏 Have👏 Their👏 Own👏 Style👏 Tarkovsky.

@XanAxDdu

3 жыл бұрын

L O L 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@XanAxDdu

3 жыл бұрын

there were several others top director it is true they were/are different. think to bergman but akso kieslowsky, or kurosawa, miyazaki, milos forman had a great sensibility, but we know what we are looking for if we are talking about or tarkovsky or kubrick a deep look into humanity, the Man and the history of man, i think. that's way i thought also to bergman, kurosawa and miyazaki

It's extremely difficult to explain why an image is beautiful. But these ones are truly magnificent beyond any reasonable doubt.

Every few days I come back to this video ... it's so calming for some reason

Stunning. Mesmerizing. Joined at the heart these two.