जेसुकै होस् हाम्रो राजा हाम्रो देश श्री पृथ्वीनारायण शाह हाम्रो नेपालको बुवा। आज पृथ्वीनारायण शाह नभैदिएको भए नेपाल भन्ने कुरो कति टुक्रो चाइनामै पुग्थ्यो कति टुक्रो इन्डियामा पुग्थ्यो के हुन्थ्यो कति मुस्लिमै मुस्लिमले आइमैहरूलाई खुट्टादेखि टाउकोसम्म कालो कपडाले छोपाएर हिँडाउँथ्यो। अहिले धन्नले श्री पृथ्वीनारायण शाहको बहादुरले एक नेपाल बनाए र आज हामी नेपाली गोर्खाली भनेर सारा संसारमा ।

@ManiKumar-ht1cf

9 күн бұрын

पंृथ्वीनारायण शाहले नेपाल ंखाल्डो गोर्खाबिस्तरित राज्यमा गाभ्े पछि त्योराज्य टिस्टाकाेगडा हुऑदा गोर्खासामराज्य बन्यो सबै गोर्खा सबै गोर्खाभाषी । पृथिवीनारायणले कहिले आफूलाई नेपाली नै भनेनन् ।गोर्खाभने।

@ManiKumar-ht1cf

9 күн бұрын

पृथिवी नारायण शाहले आफूलाई गोर्खा गोर्खाभाषा बोल्ने भने हामीले त्यो सहीबचनलाई आफ्नो जातिको नाम मानिआएका हौ तर नेपाल का पृ्थिवी बिरोधीहरूले नेपालीभन्र नेपालको नागरिक पनाई राखे गोर्खाअस्तुत्व मारेकाल् जीतिबिहिनभई बसेकाछन। नेपालमा नेपालीभन्नाले गोल्छामारवाडी पनि ेपाली डा बाबुराम्टराई पनि नेपाली। नेपाली जाति नैछैन ।अब कतिभोर गर्नेन्पाल र नेपालका े??

@eagleeyeskyview4615

8 күн бұрын

@@ManiKumar-ht1cf हजुर नेपालमा धेरै कुरा गर्न सकिन्छ तर एउटा यस्तो नेता चाहिन्छ जुन नेतालाई एक पैसाको पनि लोभ नहोस् र गरिब जनताहरु र पहाडी इलाकाहरु सबैभन्दा महत्त्वपूर्ण मानी विकास गर्न सकिन्छ। धेरै धेरै किसिमको विकास नयाँ किसिमको विकासहरु गर्न सकिन्छ जुन हाम्रो कुनै पनि नेपालमा भएको राम्रो नराम्रो नेताहरूलाई यो विषय र कसरी गर्ने भन्ने विचारधाराहरु उनीहरुको दिमागमा मनमा नै पुगेका छैनन्। र पुग्दैन पनि किनभने उहाँहरूसँग सीमित मात्रामा मात्र नलेजहरू छन्। राम्रो काम गर्नेले राम्रो काम गरिरहेका छन्। हाम्रो महान नेपालीहरूले।

@kishorchhetri441

8 күн бұрын

Lmok.oxho ​@@ManiKumar-ht1cf

महत्त्वपूर्ण ईतिहास पस्किनु भएको मा धन्यवाद🙏

खस राज्य बारे जानकारी गराउनु भएकाेमा धेरै धन्यवाद छ ।

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

किराँत मिथक: लिम्बु-किरात जडानको लागि पुरातात्विक प्रमाणको अभाव नेपालमा हालैका पुरातात्विक खोजहरूले यस क्षेत्रको पुरातन इतिहासमा नयाँ प्रकाश पारेका छन्, जसले विभिन्न जातीय समूहहरूको उपस्थिति र प्रभावको ठोस प्रमाण प्रदान गरेको छ। यद्यपि, यी निष्कर्षहरूले निश्चित लिम्बू र राई समूहहरूद्वारा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको एकीकृत "किरात" राज्य वा वंशको पौराणिक कथाको सीधै विरोध गर्दछ। शिव र राम जस्ता हिन्दू देवताहरूलाई समर्पित लिच्छवी कालका मन्दिरहरूको उत्खनन, साथै खस मल्ल र कात्युरी युगको वास्तुकलाका अवशेषहरूले नेपालमा इन्डो-आर्य संस्कृतिहरूको ऐतिहासिक महत्त्वलाई स्पष्ट रूपमा देखाउँछ। नेपाली भाषाको पुरातात्विक रूपहरूमा असंख्य शिलालेखहरू यी साइटहरूमा फेला परेका छन्, जसले लिम्बस र रइसहरू यस क्षेत्रमा आउनुभन्दा धेरै अघि इन्डो-आर्यन भाषाहरूको व्यापक प्रयोगको प्रमाण दिन्छ। यसको विपरित, लिम्बस र रईसलाई कुनै पनि प्राचीन "किरात" सभ्यता वा राज्यसँग जोड्ने पुरातात्विक वा इपिग्राफिक प्रमाणहरूको पूर्ण अभाव छ। कुनै पनि लिम्बु वा राई शिलालेख, मन्दिर, वा केहि शताब्दी भन्दा बढी पुरानो संरचनाहरू फेला परेका छैनन्। यो खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातीय समूहको यस क्षेत्रमा गहिरो जरा रहेको प्रचुर मात्रामा सामग्री प्रमाणको विपरित छ। लिम्बु र राई आदिवासी "किरात" जाति भएको दाबीलाई ऐतिहासिक अभिलेख र भाषिक विश्लेषणले झनै कमजोर बनाएको छ। विद्वानहरूले लिम्बू र राई समुदायहरू तिब्बत र चीनबाट पूर्वी नेपाल र सिक्किममा बसाइँसराइ १३औं-१६औँ शताब्दीमा मात्र पत्ता लगाएका छन्, खस, नेवार र अन्य समूहहरू यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित भइसकेका शताब्दी पछि। छोटकरीमा भन्नुपर्दा, खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातिहरूको एक सहस्राब्दीभन्दा लामो समयसम्मको राम्रो दस्तावेजीकरण गरिएको इतिहास छ, लिम्बस र राईहरू यस क्षेत्रमा सापेक्षिक रूपमा नयाँ आगमनहरू हुन्। दार्जिलिङमा ब्रिटिस औपनिवेशिक अधिकारीहरूको संरक्षणमा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको उनीहरूको पौराणिक "किरात" कथालाई कुनै ठोस पुरातात्विक, एपिग्राफिक वा ऐतिहासिक प्रमाणहरूले समर्थन गर्दैन। यो नेपालका साँचो आदिवासी जनजातिहरूको खर्चमा यी समूहहरूको हैसियत उचाल्ने उद्देश्यले बनाइएको मनगढन्ते जस्तो देखिन्छ। जति धेरै पुरातात्विक खोजहरू भइरहेका छन् र ऐतिहासिक अनुसन्धान जारी छन्, नेपालको विगतको वास्तविक विविधता र जटिलताको पर्दाफास भइरहेको छ। लिम्बु र राई "किरात" मिथकलाई प्रायोगिक प्रमाणको भारले व्यवस्थित रूपमा भत्काइँदैछ। कतिपय अवसरवादी समुदायको संशोधनवादी एजेन्डालाई बढावा दिनुको सट्टा नेपालको जातीय समूहको समृद्ध, बहुस्तरीय इतिहासलाई स्वीकार गर्ने बेला आएको छ।

महत्वपूर्ण जानकारी🙏🇳🇵🙏🇳🇵☸️🕉️।

राम्रो ज्ञान् हो।

जानकारी को लागी धन्यवाद

खुसी लाग्यो।❤

thank you for total information.

jankariko lagi dhayanbad

Thanks

राम्रो कुरा

Nikai ramailo lagyo vedio

Janakari ko lagi dhanyabad

यस्तो इतिहास न भन्दा हुदा

@GulmiReshungha

10 күн бұрын

हजुर लाई इतिहास प्रति चासो नराखेको जस्तो रहेछ।

Most important history

JAI GREATER NEPAL

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

किराँत मिथक: लिम्बु-किरात जडानको लागि पुरातात्विक प्रमाणको अभाव नेपालमा हालैका पुरातात्विक खोजहरूले यस क्षेत्रको पुरातन इतिहासमा नयाँ प्रकाश पारेका छन्, जसले विभिन्न जातीय समूहहरूको उपस्थिति र प्रभावको ठोस प्रमाण प्रदान गरेको छ। यद्यपि, यी निष्कर्षहरूले निश्चित लिम्बू र राई समूहहरूद्वारा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको एकीकृत "किरात" राज्य वा वंशको पौराणिक कथाको सीधै विरोध गर्दछ। शिव र राम जस्ता हिन्दू देवताहरूलाई समर्पित लिच्छवी कालका मन्दिरहरूको उत्खनन, साथै खस मल्ल र कात्युरी युगको वास्तुकलाका अवशेषहरूले नेपालमा इन्डो-आर्य संस्कृतिहरूको ऐतिहासिक महत्त्वलाई स्पष्ट रूपमा देखाउँछ। नेपाली भाषाको पुरातात्विक रूपहरूमा असंख्य शिलालेखहरू यी साइटहरूमा फेला परेका छन्, जसले लिम्बस र रइसहरू यस क्षेत्रमा आउनुभन्दा धेरै अघि इन्डो-आर्यन भाषाहरूको व्यापक प्रयोगको प्रमाण दिन्छ। यसको विपरित, लिम्बस र रईसलाई कुनै पनि प्राचीन "किरात" सभ्यता वा राज्यसँग जोड्ने पुरातात्विक वा इपिग्राफिक प्रमाणहरूको पूर्ण अभाव छ। कुनै पनि लिम्बु वा राई शिलालेख, मन्दिर, वा केहि शताब्दी भन्दा बढी पुरानो संरचनाहरू फेला परेका छैनन्। यो खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातीय समूहको यस क्षेत्रमा गहिरो जरा रहेको प्रचुर मात्रामा सामग्री प्रमाणको विपरित छ। लिम्बु र राई आदिवासी "किरात" जाति भएको दाबीलाई ऐतिहासिक अभिलेख र भाषिक विश्लेषणले झनै कमजोर बनाएको छ। विद्वानहरूले लिम्बू र राई समुदायहरू तिब्बत र चीनबाट पूर्वी नेपाल र सिक्किममा बसाइँसराइ १३औं-१६औँ शताब्दीमा मात्र पत्ता लगाएका छन्, खस, नेवार र अन्य समूहहरू यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित भइसकेका शताब्दी पछि। छोटकरीमा भन्नुपर्दा, खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातिहरूको एक सहस्राब्दीभन्दा लामो समयसम्मको राम्रो दस्तावेजीकरण गरिएको इतिहास छ, लिम्बस र राईहरू यस क्षेत्रमा सापेक्षिक रूपमा नयाँ आगमनहरू हुन्। दार्जिलिङमा ब्रिटिस औपनिवेशिक अधिकारीहरूको संरक्षणमा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको उनीहरूको पौराणिक "किरात" कथालाई कुनै ठोस पुरातात्विक, एपिग्राफिक वा ऐतिहासिक प्रमाणहरूले समर्थन गर्दैन। यो नेपालका साँचो आदिवासी जनजातिहरूको खर्चमा यी समूहहरूको हैसियत उचाल्ने उद्देश्यले बनाइएको मनगढन्ते जस्तो देखिन्छ। जति धेरै पुरातात्विक खोजहरू भइरहेका छन् र ऐतिहासिक अनुसन्धान जारी छन्, नेपालको विगतको वास्तविक विविधता र जटिलताको पर्दाफास भइरहेको छ। लिम्बु र राई "किरात" मिथकलाई प्रायोगिक प्रमाणको भारले व्यवस्थित रूपमा भत्काइँदैछ। कतिपय अवसरवादी समुदायको संशोधनवादी एजेन्डालाई बढावा दिनुको सट्टा नेपालको जातीय समूहको समृद्ध, बहुस्तरीय इतिहासलाई स्वीकार गर्ने बेला आएको छ।

यसपछि २२से राज्य जुम्लाको शक्तिशाली राजा वलिराजको बारेमा पनि भिडियो बनाउनु पर्‍यो सर

Tamng history pani bhanu paryo.... connection with kirat and other civilization ... Dr. George Van Drain को reference linu hola... Dr.Anathology.. BunDegun ... clearly explain garnus na.

सबै खस सिजि को ठाऊ कताहो तो ठाऊ दिन स्कनुभयन कुनठाऊहो दरबारकांहांहो रिपिट गनुहोला जय सिंजा

के पत्याउनु, के नपत्याउनु, हामीलाई केही थाहा छैन त

😮

अति नै आवश्यक इतिहास बताउनुभएको मा हार्दिक धन्यसर! तर, आफूहरु मात्रलाई इतिहासकारको सन्तन्ति सम्झने मनुवादी ब्राह्मणहरुको मुटुमा आगो नबल्ला भन्न चाहिँ सकिन्न है सर!

बिस्वकर्मा को ईतिहास भन्दिम्न

chetri haru le janai dharan gareko khas rajya ko patan pachi matra bhayeko thiyo

योखसहरुकोऐलेसमनामोनिसानथियणऐलेकाहाबातपलायो योखसहरुपछिमगडवालमाभनेकोसुनेकोथियो। 5:53

@greatvision4808

9 күн бұрын

ओइ तोरी ! कुन भाषा हो यो ?

पार्ट 2को जान कारी पाउ

जब देखि डोटि को भट्ट ब्राह्मण जुम्ला कि रानी सङ्ग बिहे गरे नौ खुवा अछाम को राजा भए देखि हाम्रो पुर्खा को राज्य टुक्रा टुक्रा भको हो हाम्रो रास्कोटि ठकुरी ले चाहिँ पछि दुल्लु राज्य र दैलेख राज्य समालेको थियो

खारीमा रहेको रबि ष-याल अहिले उहाँको बंशलाई खरेल भनिन्छ रबि खरेल पनि नाग बंशी राजाको सन्तन भएको कारणले त्यहाँको गुम्बाका शिलाप थ्ररमा वा कतै ढुङ्गा शिलापथ्ररमा रबि ष-याल लेखिएको अभिलेख छकि भन्ने हाम्रो बंशको राज्य पनि खोज र अनुसन्धानको विषय रहेको छ ।

yo shai ho hamro empire khojnu parxa

@SandeshKushwaha-tl2fd

11 күн бұрын

The Rais and Limbus were initially primitive tribes in eastern Nepal, often described as nomadic and lacking a structured society. However, their fortunes changed dramatically under British rule. The British, seeking reliable local allies, favored the Rais and Limbus, who in return supported British geopolitical interests, particularly in Sikkim. This patronage allowed the Rais and Limbus to gain significant socio-political leverage, which they used to further their own agendas. Conflict Between Lepchas and Bhutias in Sikkim The Lepchas and Bhutias have long been the primary ethnic groups in Sikkim. The Bhutia Chogyals ruled Sikkim for centuries, with the Lepchas playing a significant role in the kingdom's cultural and social fabric. However, the arrival and subsequent rise of the Rais and Limbus disrupted this balance. The Rais and Limbus employed a strategy of divide and rule, learned from their British allies. They fabricated narratives suggesting a shared origin between the Lepchas and Limbus, aiming to weaken the unity between Lepchas and Bhutias. By claiming that Lepchas and Limbus were the same people, they sought to undermine Bhutia dominance and create an ethnic rift. Moreover, the Limbus introduced a writing script purportedly derived from Tibetan and Lepcha sources, furthering their claim to a shared heritage with the Lepchas. The Bhutias, being relatively isolated mountain people, struggled to counter these sophisticated manipulations. The resulting confusion and mistrust between the Lepchas and Bhutias weakened their collective resistance against external influences, including those of the Rais and Limbus. Instigating Conflict Between Chettri and Brahmin in Nepal In Nepal, the Rais and Limbus attempted to exploit existing social hierarchies to create discord between the Chettri and Brahmin communities. The Chettris and Brahmins, both belonging to the Khas Arya group, have traditionally held significant political and social influence in Nepal. By fabricating stories and spreading rumors, the Rais and Limbus aimed to pit these two communities against each other. This divide-and-rule tactic involved highlighting and exacerbating minor disputes and differences, thus fostering a climate of mistrust and rivalry. The objective was to destabilize the socio-political cohesion of the dominant groups, thereby creating opportunities for the Rais and Limbus to assert their influence. Creating Division Between Shrestha and Maharjan The Shrestha and Maharjan communities, integral to the Newar society of Kathmandu Valley, were not immune to the machinations of the Rais and Limbus. By manipulating historical narratives and exploiting social tensions, the Rais and Limbus sought to create divisions within the Newar community. The Shresthas, typically of higher social status, and the Maharjans, primarily involved in agriculture and trade, were targeted through a campaign of misinformation and fabricated grievances. This strategy aimed to weaken the unity of the Newar community, making it easier for the Rais and Limbus to advance their interests.

@prabhuewai9905

9 күн бұрын

​@@SandeshKushwaha-tl2fdit seems Limbu , Rai mistreated you in the past and your feelings were hurt badly. Why do you feel so threatened by them?

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

किराँत मिथक: लिम्बु-किरात जडानको लागि पुरातात्विक प्रमाणको अभाव नेपालमा हालैका पुरातात्विक खोजहरूले यस क्षेत्रको पुरातन इतिहासमा नयाँ प्रकाश पारेका छन्, जसले विभिन्न जातीय समूहहरूको उपस्थिति र प्रभावको ठोस प्रमाण प्रदान गरेको छ। यद्यपि, यी निष्कर्षहरूले निश्चित लिम्बू र राई समूहहरूद्वारा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको एकीकृत "किरात" राज्य वा वंशको पौराणिक कथाको सीधै विरोध गर्दछ। शिव र राम जस्ता हिन्दू देवताहरूलाई समर्पित लिच्छवी कालका मन्दिरहरूको उत्खनन, साथै खस मल्ल र कात्युरी युगको वास्तुकलाका अवशेषहरूले नेपालमा इन्डो-आर्य संस्कृतिहरूको ऐतिहासिक महत्त्वलाई स्पष्ट रूपमा देखाउँछ। नेपाली भाषाको पुरातात्विक रूपहरूमा असंख्य शिलालेखहरू यी साइटहरूमा फेला परेका छन्, जसले लिम्बस र रइसहरू यस क्षेत्रमा आउनुभन्दा धेरै अघि इन्डो-आर्यन भाषाहरूको व्यापक प्रयोगको प्रमाण दिन्छ। यसको विपरित, लिम्बस र रईसलाई कुनै पनि प्राचीन "किरात" सभ्यता वा राज्यसँग जोड्ने पुरातात्विक वा इपिग्राफिक प्रमाणहरूको पूर्ण अभाव छ। कुनै पनि लिम्बु वा राई शिलालेख, मन्दिर, वा केहि शताब्दी भन्दा बढी पुरानो संरचनाहरू फेला परेका छैनन्। यो खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातीय समूहको यस क्षेत्रमा गहिरो जरा रहेको प्रचुर मात्रामा सामग्री प्रमाणको विपरित छ। लिम्बु र राई आदिवासी "किरात" जाति भएको दाबीलाई ऐतिहासिक अभिलेख र भाषिक विश्लेषणले झनै कमजोर बनाएको छ। विद्वानहरूले लिम्बू र राई समुदायहरू तिब्बत र चीनबाट पूर्वी नेपाल र सिक्किममा बसाइँसराइ १३औं-१६औँ शताब्दीमा मात्र पत्ता लगाएका छन्, खस, नेवार र अन्य समूहहरू यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित भइसकेका शताब्दी पछि। छोटकरीमा भन्नुपर्दा, खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातिहरूको एक सहस्राब्दीभन्दा लामो समयसम्मको राम्रो दस्तावेजीकरण गरिएको इतिहास छ, लिम्बस र राईहरू यस क्षेत्रमा सापेक्षिक रूपमा नयाँ आगमनहरू हुन्। दार्जिलिङमा ब्रिटिस औपनिवेशिक अधिकारीहरूको संरक्षणमा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको उनीहरूको पौराणिक "किरात" कथालाई कुनै ठोस पुरातात्विक, एपिग्राफिक वा ऐतिहासिक प्रमाणहरूले समर्थन गर्दैन। यो नेपालका साँचो आदिवासी जनजातिहरूको खर्चमा यी समूहहरूको हैसियत उचाल्ने उद्देश्यले बनाइएको मनगढन्ते जस्तो देखिन्छ। जति धेरै पुरातात्विक खोजहरू भइरहेका छन् र ऐतिहासिक अनुसन्धान जारी छन्, नेपालको विगतको वास्तविक विविधता र जटिलताको पर्दाफास भइरहेको छ। लिम्बु र राई "किरात" मिथकलाई प्रायोगिक प्रमाणको भारले व्यवस्थित रूपमा भत्काइँदैछ। कतिपय अवसरवादी समुदायको संशोधनवादी एजेन्डालाई बढावा दिनुको सट्टा नेपालको जातीय समूहको समृद्ध, बहुस्तरीय इतिहासलाई स्वीकार गर्ने बेला आएको छ।

अहिले नेपालको खस हरु सबै बाहुन भइ सकेका छन !

@rajendrakumarluitel3539

9 күн бұрын

हो तिमि हरु जस्ता साम्न्ति दलाल ले बाहुन को बिरोध नगरि खान पाउदैनौ।त्यसै ले कुनै नै कुनै बाहान मा उनि हरु को बिरोध गरे का हुन्छ।

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

किराँत मिथक: लिम्बु-किरात जडानको लागि पुरातात्विक प्रमाणको अभाव नेपालमा हालैका पुरातात्विक खोजहरूले यस क्षेत्रको पुरातन इतिहासमा नयाँ प्रकाश पारेका छन्, जसले विभिन्न जातीय समूहहरूको उपस्थिति र प्रभावको ठोस प्रमाण प्रदान गरेको छ। यद्यपि, यी निष्कर्षहरूले निश्चित लिम्बू र राई समूहहरूद्वारा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको एकीकृत "किरात" राज्य वा वंशको पौराणिक कथाको सीधै विरोध गर्दछ। शिव र राम जस्ता हिन्दू देवताहरूलाई समर्पित लिच्छवी कालका मन्दिरहरूको उत्खनन, साथै खस मल्ल र कात्युरी युगको वास्तुकलाका अवशेषहरूले नेपालमा इन्डो-आर्य संस्कृतिहरूको ऐतिहासिक महत्त्वलाई स्पष्ट रूपमा देखाउँछ। नेपाली भाषाको पुरातात्विक रूपहरूमा असंख्य शिलालेखहरू यी साइटहरूमा फेला परेका छन्, जसले लिम्बस र रइसहरू यस क्षेत्रमा आउनुभन्दा धेरै अघि इन्डो-आर्यन भाषाहरूको व्यापक प्रयोगको प्रमाण दिन्छ। यसको विपरित, लिम्बस र रईसलाई कुनै पनि प्राचीन "किरात" सभ्यता वा राज्यसँग जोड्ने पुरातात्विक वा इपिग्राफिक प्रमाणहरूको पूर्ण अभाव छ। कुनै पनि लिम्बु वा राई शिलालेख, मन्दिर, वा केहि शताब्दी भन्दा बढी पुरानो संरचनाहरू फेला परेका छैनन्। यो खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातीय समूहको यस क्षेत्रमा गहिरो जरा रहेको प्रचुर मात्रामा सामग्री प्रमाणको विपरित छ। लिम्बु र राई आदिवासी "किरात" जाति भएको दाबीलाई ऐतिहासिक अभिलेख र भाषिक विश्लेषणले झनै कमजोर बनाएको छ। विद्वानहरूले लिम्बू र राई समुदायहरू तिब्बत र चीनबाट पूर्वी नेपाल र सिक्किममा बसाइँसराइ १३औं-१६औँ शताब्दीमा मात्र पत्ता लगाएका छन्, खस, नेवार र अन्य समूहहरू यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित भइसकेका शताब्दी पछि। छोटकरीमा भन्नुपर्दा, खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातिहरूको एक सहस्राब्दीभन्दा लामो समयसम्मको राम्रो दस्तावेजीकरण गरिएको इतिहास छ, लिम्बस र राईहरू यस क्षेत्रमा सापेक्षिक रूपमा नयाँ आगमनहरू हुन्। दार्जिलिङमा ब्रिटिस औपनिवेशिक अधिकारीहरूको संरक्षणमा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको उनीहरूको पौराणिक "किरात" कथालाई कुनै ठोस पुरातात्विक, एपिग्राफिक वा ऐतिहासिक प्रमाणहरूले समर्थन गर्दैन। यो नेपालका साँचो आदिवासी जनजातिहरूको खर्चमा यी समूहहरूको हैसियत उचाल्ने उद्देश्यले बनाइएको मनगढन्ते जस्तो देखिन्छ। जति धेरै पुरातात्विक खोजहरू भइरहेका छन् र ऐतिहासिक अनुसन्धान जारी छन्, नेपालको विगतको वास्तविक विविधता र जटिलताको पर्दाफास भइरहेको छ। लिम्बु र राई "किरात" मिथकलाई प्रायोगिक प्रमाणको भारले व्यवस्थित रूपमा भत्काइँदैछ। कतिपय अवसरवादी समुदायको संशोधनवादी एजेन्डालाई बढावा दिनुको सट्टा नेपालको जातीय समूहको समृद्ध, बहुस्तरीय इतिहासलाई स्वीकार गर्ने बेला आएको छ।

प्राचीन सनातन देखीनै बुदध सभ्यताको बुधिजम कींडम विशाल बुदध धर्ती पछील्लो समयमा बिस्तार हुदै २२ सेय र २४ सेय राज्य को पुर्ब इतीहाई ठुटेफुटेका मात्र हो प्रथम राजा बद्ध सभ्यताको बुधिसत्व मञ्जु श्री देखीन निर्जिब कीतसब मा जिबीतै छ ?

om mani padme hoon dullu prithivi malla abhilekh

राम्राज्य भन्दा खस कसरी बने या बनाइए? कसले बनायो?

@Nabinxettri-lv5co

9 күн бұрын

Ta kasari damai kaami bata biswakarma banish

राजाभयकोहैनयोवाईयातहपचछिबाटआयेकोहोइनेरूलेबनाउटिकाहानिहोखसहरूगडुवालबाटआयकाहुआऊदागाईभैसीपालदैपुरबबडंदैआयकाहुनऐलेराजगरेकाठियभनेकोबनाउतीकुराहूणऐलेजेपनिलखणभनपाकैछजेभनेपनिजेलेखेपनिभैहालछमजनमेदेखिखसहरुराजाठियेभनणेकुरामपतियाउदिन।

Khas iraq,iranko ho bhanne malai pahilenai thaha bhayeko kina sikauxas mlai

@Aasthagurung8010

9 күн бұрын

Magar haru Mongolia bata aayeka hun 🤗🤗🤗

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

tero kei history chaina nepal ma. terकिराँत मिथक: लिम्बु-किरात जडानको लागि पुरातात्विक प्रमाणको अभाव नेपालमा हालैका पुरातात्विक खोजहरूले यस क्षेत्रको पुरातन इतिहासमा नयाँ प्रकाश पारेका छन्, जसले विभिन्न जातीय समूहहरूको उपस्थिति र प्रभावको ठोस प्रमाण प्रदान गरेको छ। यद्यपि, यी निष्कर्षहरूले निश्चित लिम्बू र राई समूहहरूद्वारा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको एकीकृत "किरात" राज्य वा वंशको पौराणिक कथाको सीधै विरोध गर्दछ। शिव र राम जस्ता हिन्दू देवताहरूलाई समर्पित लिच्छवी कालका मन्दिरहरूको उत्खनन, साथै खस मल्ल र कात्युरी युगको वास्तुकलाका अवशेषहरूले नेपालमा इन्डो-आर्य संस्कृतिहरूको ऐतिहासिक महत्त्वलाई स्पष्ट रूपमा देखाउँछ। नेपाली भाषाको पुरातात्विक रूपहरूमा असंख्य शिलालेखहरू यी साइटहरूमा फेला परेका छन्, जसले लिम्बस र रइसहरू यस क्षेत्रमा आउनुभन्दा धेरै अघि इन्डो-आर्यन भाषाहरूको व्यापक प्रयोगको प्रमाण दिन्छ। यसको विपरित, लिम्बस र रईसलाई कुनै पनि प्राचीन "किरात" सभ्यता वा राज्यसँग जोड्ने पुरातात्विक वा इपिग्राफिक प्रमाणहरूको पूर्ण अभाव छ। कुनै पनि लिम्बु वा राई शिलालेख, मन्दिर, वा केहि शताब्दी भन्दा बढी पुरानो संरचनाहरू फेला परेका छैनन्। यो खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातीय समूहको यस क्षेत्रमा गहिरो जरा रहेको प्रचुर मात्रामा सामग्री प्रमाणको विपरित छ। लिम्बु र राई आदिवासी "किरात" जाति भएको दाबीलाई ऐतिहासिक अभिलेख र भाषिक विश्लेषणले झनै कमजोर बनाएको छ। विद्वानहरूले लिम्बू र राई समुदायहरू तिब्बत र चीनबाट पूर्वी नेपाल र सिक्किममा बसाइँसराइ १३औं-१६औँ शताब्दीमा मात्र पत्ता लगाएका छन्, खस, नेवार र अन्य समूहहरू यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित भइसकेका शताब्दी पछि। छोटकरीमा भन्नुपर्दा, खस, नेवार र अन्य नेपाली जातिहरूको एक सहस्राब्दीभन्दा लामो समयसम्मको राम्रो दस्तावेजीकरण गरिएको इतिहास छ, लिम्बस र राईहरू यस क्षेत्रमा सापेक्षिक रूपमा नयाँ आगमनहरू हुन्। दार्जिलिङमा ब्रिटिस औपनिवेशिक अधिकारीहरूको संरक्षणमा प्रवर्द्धन गरिएको उनीहरूको पौराणिक "किरात" कथालाई कुनै ठोस पुरातात्विक, एपिग्राफिक वा ऐतिहासिक प्रमाणहरूले समर्थन गर्दैन। यो नेपालका साँचो आदिवासी जनजातिहरूको खर्चमा यी समूहहरूको हैसियत उचाल्ने उद्देश्यले बनाइएको मनगढन्ते जस्तो देखिन्छ। जति धेरै पुरातात्विक खोजहरू भइरहेका छन् र ऐतिहासिक अनुसन्धान जारी छन्, नेपालको विगतको वास्तविक विविधता र जटिलताको पर्दाफास भइरहेको छ। लिम्बु र राई "किरात" मिथकलाई प्रायोगिक प्रमाणको भारले व्यवस्थित रूपमा भत्काइँदैछ। कतिपय अवसरवादी समुदायको संशोधनवादी एजेन्डालाई बढावा दिनुको सट्टा नेपालको जातीय समूहको समृद्ध, बहुस्तरीय इतिहासलाई स्वीकार गर्ने बेला आएको छ।

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

Magar mongour Mongol mongolia bata aaeko ho. Sen raja le afno army ma rakhna thale pachi 14th century ma hinduism ma convert gare ho. I have proof. Sen Kings were maithili who later became khas aryas

तपाईॅको शीर्षक नै किर्ते भो किनभने गोर्खाभित्र नेपाल पसेको हो नेपाल भित्र खस होइन. खसकोभाषा खस हो नेपा। लभाषा होइन / कुरा साचो रखेपो तिमिहरूलाई पत्य्ंउनु खस जीति ाई ईतिहीस बिहीन बनाउने हरूले बुज्नै परुने के होभने नेपाल state ho खस जात हो गोर्खा डजाति ,नेपालका नागरिक भएकालेनेपाली भन्नु सही ,केवल नागरिकता बुज्छन

@SajiloSchool

11 күн бұрын

धन्यवाद 🙏 Thumbnail बदलेँ ।

भ्यूज बढ्ने भयो है ।

होइन

kashmir, himanchal, uttrakhanda , nepal dekhi sikkim samma ka khas sabai eutai hun ...eutai look eutai facecut ....mix bhyeka ali ali mongol dekhinxa natra sabai eutai hun....

Fabrication of Historical Narratives To justify their support and solidify their alliances, the British encouraged the Limbus and Khambus to assert historical claims that linked them to ancient and prestigious lineages, such as the Kirat dynasty. Prominent figures like Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in promoting these fabricated narratives. These new historical claims often overshadowed the authentic histories of other groups like the Lepchas, Bhutias, Newars, and Khas Aryas. Marginalization of Other Ethnic Histories The focus on the Kirat narrative and the elevation of the Limbus and Khambus marginalized other ethnic groups. The rich histories and contributions of the Lepchas, Bhutias, Newars, and Khas Aryas were often downplayed or ignored. Educational curricula and historical texts began to emphasize the contributions of the Limbus and Khambus, leading to a distorted understanding of the region's past. Social Dynamics and Conflict The Limbus and Social Stigma Historically, the Limbus were looked down upon by the Lepchas and Bhutias due to their perceived "dirty ways" and lack of clothing. Before British intervention, the Limbus were often seen as a primitive tribe, lacking a permanent place to live and roaming the region. The British support significantly altered this perception, providing the Limbus with economic and social mobility. Efforts to Villify the Bhutias To solidify their new-found status and alliances, the Limbus engaged in elaborate hate campaigns against the Bhutias. They attempted to fabricate a connection with the Lepchas, portraying themselves as sharing a common origin. This was a strategic move to vilify the Bhutias and drive a wedge between the Bhutias and Lepchas. The Bhutias, being simple mountain people, struggled to understand these political maneuvers. The Limbus, having learned divide-and-rule tactics from the British, used these strategies effectively to gain favor and power. Conflicts in Nepal The divide-and-rule tactics did not stop at the borders of Sikkim. In Nepal, the Limbus and Khambus also attempted to create conflicts between various communities. They plotted to create discord between the Brahmin and Chettri communities of Nepal, as well as between the Shrestha and Maharjan communities. These efforts were aimed at destabilizing traditional power structures and further consolidating their own influence, learned and honed under British patronage. Long-Term Consequences The long-term consequences of British favoritism towards the Limbus and Khambus are still evident today. The socio-political landscape of both Nepal and Sikkim has been irrevocably altered, with these groups continuing to hold significant influence. The historical narratives that emerged during the colonial period have shaped national identities and collective memories, often at the expense of a more inclusive understanding of the diverse heritage of these regions. The legacy of British favoritism has also contributed to ongoing ethnic tensions and conflicts within Nepal and Sikkim. The elevation of certain groups over others created divisions that persist, complicating efforts towards national unity and social cohesion.

@prabhuewai9905

9 күн бұрын

Mahashaya, did a Limbu or Rai hurt you badly? Everywhere you are trying to mislead others!

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

@@prabhuewai9905 The Fabricated Kirat Myth: Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Limbu-Kirat Connection Recent archaeological discoveries in Nepal have shed new light on the ancient history of the region, providing tangible evidence of the presence and influence of various ethnic groups. However, these findings directly contradict the mythical narrative of a unified "Kirat" kingdom or lineage that has been promoted by certain Limbu and Rai groups. Excavations of Licchavi period temples dedicated to Hindu deities like Shiva and Ram, as well as remnants of Khas Malla and Katyuri era architecture, clearly demonstrate the historical significance of Indo-Aryan cultures in Nepal. Numerous inscriptions in archaic forms of the Nepali language have been uncovered at these sites, attesting to the widespread use of Indo-Aryan languages long before the Limbus and Rais arrived in the region. In contrast, there is a complete lack of archaeological or epigraphic evidence linking the Limbus and Rais to any ancient "Kirat" civilization or kingdom. No Limbu or Rai inscriptions, temples, or other structures dating back more than a few centuries have been discovered. This stands in stark contrast to the abundant material proof of the Khas, Newar, and other Nepali ethnic groups' deep roots in the region. The Limbu and Rai claims of being the indigenous "Kirat" people are further undermined by historical records and linguistic analysis. Scholars have traced the migration of Limbu and Rai communities from Tibet and China to eastern Nepal and Sikkim only in the 13th-16th centuries CE, centuries after the Khas, Newar, and other groups had already established themselves in the region. In short, while the Khas, Newar, and other Nepali ethnicities have a well-documented history stretching back over a millennium, the Limbus and Rais are relative newcomers to the area. Their mythical "Kirat" narrative, promoted with the patronage of the British colonial authorities in Darjeeling, is not supported by any concrete archaeological, epigraphic, or historical evidence. It appears to be a fabrication designed to elevate the status of these groups at the expense of Nepal's true indigenous peoples. As more archaeological discoveries are made and historical research continues, the true diversity and complexity of Nepal's past is being uncovered. The Limbu and Rai "Kirat" myth is being systematically dismantled by the weight of empirical evidence. It is time to acknowledge the rich, multilayered history of Nepal's ethnic groups, rather than promoting the revisionist agenda of certain opportunistic communities.

5 century mai khash rajhya thiyo

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

The Fabricated Kirat Myth: Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Limbu-Kirat Connection Recent archaeological discoveries in Nepal have shed new light on the ancient history of the region, providing tangible evidence of the presence and influence of various ethnic groups. However, these findings directly contradict the mythical narrative of a unified "Kirat" kingdom or lineage that has been promoted by certain Limbu and Rai groups. Excavations of Licchavi period temples dedicated to Hindu deities like Shiva and Ram, as well as remnants of Khas Malla and Katyuri era architecture, clearly demonstrate the historical significance of Indo-Aryan cultures in Nepal. Numerous inscriptions in archaic forms of the Nepali language have been uncovered at these sites, attesting to the widespread use of Indo-Aryan languages long before the Limbus and Rais arrived in the region. In contrast, there is a complete lack of archaeological or epigraphic evidence linking the Limbus and Rais to any ancient "Kirat" civilization or kingdom. No Limbu or Rai inscriptions, temples, or other structures dating back more than a few centuries have been discovered. This stands in stark contrast to the abundant material proof of the Khas, Newar, and other Nepali ethnic groups' deep roots in the region. The Limbu and Rai claims of being the indigenous "Kirat" people are further undermined by historical records and linguistic analysis. Scholars have traced the migration of Limbu and Rai communities from Tibet and China to eastern Nepal and Sikkim only in the 13th-16th centuries CE, centuries after the Khas, Newar, and other groups had already established themselves in the region. In short, while the Khas, Newar, and other Nepali ethnicities have a well-documented history stretching back over a millennium, the Limbus and Rais are relative newcomers to the area. Their mythical "Kirat" narrative, promoted with the patronage of the British colonial authorities in Darjeeling, is not supported by any concrete archaeological, epigraphic, or historical evidence. It appears to be a fabrication designed to elevate the status of these groups at the expense of Nepal's true indigenous peoples. As more archaeological discoveries are made and historical research continues, the true diversity and complexity of Nepal's past is being uncovered. The Limbu and Rai "Kirat" myth is being systematically dismantled by the weight of empirical evidence. It is time to acknowledge the rich, multilayered history of Nepal's ethnic groups, rather than promoting the revisionist agenda of certain opportunistic communities.

यस्तो महान बीरतापूर्ण ईतिहास लाई दलालहरुले बिदेसिको पोल्टामा हालिदिए !!

Itihans metinu hundaina!

Niyantrad garda garda aaja mcc ko pachi niyantit bane neta ab nepal.ne pal lao ne fal bhane chan aahile ka le sika

Khas k ho

काकडा सम्म मात्र होइन लदाख सम्म हो कस्मिर नाम नाइ खसस्मिर हुँदै कस्मिर भको हो

नाम बाटै थाहा हुन्छ खसहरु हिन्दू हुन तर बौद्ध पनि मान्थे सबै नामहरु हिन्दु छन ।

इतिहास विजेताको मात्रै लेखिन्छ रे,त्यसैले ईतिहास सत्य हुदैन भन्छन त, केहोला ??

राजा जनक चै काे थिए र कति बर्ष अघि हाे।अनि कहाँ बिदेश देखाकाे भ्रमकाे खेति नगर

@SajiloSchool

Күн бұрын

इतिहाससम्बन्धी सामग्री भएका कारण धर्म शास्त्रको/त्रेता युगको कुरा राख्न सकिएन । पूर्वप्रचीन कालका बारेमा पछि अर्को सामग्री प्रकाशित हुने छ । धन्यवाद !

@SajiloSchool

Күн бұрын

साथै, नेपालको सिमाना धेरै पटक गंगा नदीसम्म पुगेको तथ्य भुल्नु भएन ।

khasyan rajya garda magar rajya theya ki thiyanan moile alik confused vaya magar ra gurung haru bastheyo josto layo. Ani tharu haru madhesi buvag ma baso bas dekhinxa ta according to geography??? 🤔🤔

@SajiloSchool

11 күн бұрын

पूर्ण प्रकाश नेपाल ‘यात्री’ ले आफ्नो अनुसन्धानमा मगर र गुरुङ दुवैको ग्रामराज्य बसिसकेको थियो भनी लेखेका छन् ।

@SandeshKushwaha-tl2fd

11 күн бұрын

The Rais and Limbus were initially primitive tribes in eastern Nepal, often described as nomadic and lacking a structured society. However, their fortunes changed dramatically under British rule. The British, seeking reliable local allies, favored the Rais and Limbus, who in return supported British geopolitical interests, particularly in Sikkim. This patronage allowed the Rais and Limbus to gain significant socio-political leverage, which they used to further their own agendas. Conflict Between Lepchas and Bhutias in Sikkim The Lepchas and Bhutias have long been the primary ethnic groups in Sikkim. The Bhutia Chogyals ruled Sikkim for centuries, with the Lepchas playing a significant role in the kingdom's cultural and social fabric. However, the arrival and subsequent rise of the Rais and Limbus disrupted this balance. The Rais and Limbus employed a strategy of divide and rule, learned from their British allies. They fabricated narratives suggesting a shared origin between the Lepchas and Limbus, aiming to weaken the unity between Lepchas and Bhutias. By claiming that Lepchas and Limbus were the same people, they sought to undermine Bhutia dominance and create an ethnic rift. Moreover, the Limbus introduced a writing script purportedly derived from Tibetan and Lepcha sources, furthering their claim to a shared heritage with the Lepchas. The Bhutias, being relatively isolated mountain people, struggled to counter these sophisticated manipulations. The resulting confusion and mistrust between the Lepchas and Bhutias weakened their collective resistance against external influences, including those of the Rais and Limbus. Instigating Conflict Between Chettri and Brahmin in Nepal In Nepal, the Rais and Limbus attempted to exploit existing social hierarchies to create discord between the Chettri and Brahmin communities. The Chettris and Brahmins, both belonging to the Khas Arya group, have traditionally held significant political and social influence in Nepal. By fabricating stories and spreading rumors, the Rais and Limbus aimed to pit these two communities against each other. This divide-and-rule tactic involved highlighting and exacerbating minor disputes and differences, thus fostering a climate of mistrust and rivalry. The objective was to destabilize the socio-political cohesion of the dominant groups, thereby creating opportunities for the Rais and Limbus to assert their influence. Creating Division Between Shrestha and Maharjan The Shrestha and Maharjan communities, integral to the Newar society of Kathmandu Valley, were not immune to the machinations of the Rais and Limbus. By manipulating historical narratives and exploiting social tensions, the Rais and Limbus sought to create divisions within the Newar community. The Shresthas, typically of higher social status, and the Maharjans, primarily involved in agriculture and trade, were targeted through a campaign of misinformation and fabricated grievances. This strategy aimed to weaken the unity of the Newar community, making it easier for the Rais and Limbus to advance their interests.

Kura sahi ho ,khas haru bahun sanga behe garera afno pahichan nai metayo

@dipeshbhatt451

8 күн бұрын

Kashmir ke bahun hi khud ko kash bolte hai

खसहरु यत्रो पनि पश्चिम बाट आएका होइनन् ।खसहरु खासमा प्रकृतिपुजक हुन् ।पश्चिम बाट आएकाहरुले प्रकृति पुज्दैनन।

Khas haru bhanda kheri originally Hindu hoina raicha, hoina ta

@prabhuewai9905

9 күн бұрын

Pahila prakriti pujak ra Buddhist thiye

Yetro pauranika sabbeta etihash bhayeka khas haru lai aarye bahun sanga misai diyeka chhan, yesta Galata karye ma kohi khas haru le boleko sunidaina.

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

The Fabricated Kirat Myth: Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Limbu-Kirat Connection Recent archaeological discoveries in Nepal have shed new light on the ancient history of the region, providing tangible evidence of the presence and influence of various ethnic groups. However, these findings directly contradict the mythical narrative of a unified "Kirat" kingdom or lineage that has been promoted by certain Limbu and Rai groups. Excavations of Licchavi period temples dedicated to Hindu deities like Shiva and Ram, as well as remnants of Khas Malla and Katyuri era architecture, clearly demonstrate the historical significance of Indo-Aryan cultures in Nepal. Numerous inscriptions in archaic forms of the Nepali language have been uncovered at these sites, attesting to the widespread use of Indo-Aryan languages long before the Limbus and Rais arrived in the region. In contrast, there is a complete lack of archaeological or epigraphic evidence linking the Limbus and Rais to any ancient "Kirat" civilization or kingdom. No Limbu or Rai inscriptions, temples, or other structures dating back more than a few centuries have been discovered. This stands in stark contrast to the abundant material proof of the Khas, Newar, and other Nepali ethnic groups' deep roots in the region. The Limbu and Rai claims of being the indigenous "Kirat" people are further undermined by historical records and linguistic analysis. Scholars have traced the migration of Limbu and Rai communities from Tibet and China to eastern Nepal and Sikkim only in the 13th-16th centuries CE, centuries after the Khas, Newar, and other groups had already established themselves in the region. In short, while the Khas, Newar, and other Nepali ethnicities have a well-documented history stretching back over a millennium, the Limbus and Rais are relative newcomers to the area. Their mythical "Kirat" narrative, promoted with the patronage of the British colonial authorities in Darjeeling, is not supported by any concrete archaeological, epigraphic, or historical evidence. It appears to be a fabrication designed to elevate the status of these groups at the expense of Nepal's true indigenous peoples. As more archaeological discoveries are made and historical research continues, the true diversity and complexity of Nepal's past is being uncovered. The Limbu and Rai "Kirat" myth is being systematically dismantled by the weight of empirical evidence. It is time to acknowledge the rich, multilayered history of Nepal's ethnic groups, rather than promoting the revisionist agenda of certain opportunistic communities.

Babylonia bata khas haru aayeka bhaye uniharuko, bhasa, dharma, sanskriti, bhes bhusa pani tetaiko hunu parne .

@SajiloSchool

9 күн бұрын

जरो उताको हो । सभ्यताको यो ढाँचा यतै आएर बनेको हो ।

@user-pw6pg8hz1n

9 күн бұрын

​@@SajiloSchoolmalai ta sindhu ghati bata nai aako jasto lagchho ho hami sabai . Hamro sindhu savyata jhan purano chha

@user-pw6pg8hz1n

9 күн бұрын

​@@SajiloSchoolyo anga banga karnatak samma pugyo vannuhunchha ta k vannu bhako ho clear gardinuna

Brahma raja haru aayera jumla lagayat ka rajya haru hindu karan bhayeko pusti huncha. Natra pahila sabai buddhist nai thiya. Satya kura lai swikarnu parcha. India ko dherai historian haru le ni bancha kushan kaal athava khash ko bela sabai bharatvarsh buddhist tiyo bhanera

Acham ka raja kata chhade yo managante kura bhaeyena Ra

Khass haru haru kahibata aakohoina ahi pahadi vegkahun bolne bhasa lipi aahikoho sabai Etihass bahunle lexan sabai baira bata aakohovanera haitt

Yo video ma used bhako khas kingdom ko map ali badhai chadai kalpanik banako cha hau Accurate chaina 😂😂

dekhayeki map ali badi bhayo😂

Uttrakhand ko khas ra karnali ko khas ali farak chan Karnali ko khas ahile chetri hatu hun 25 lakh populayion cha

@sandhyathapaofficial9617

12 күн бұрын

सबै क्षेत्री खस होइन हजुर

@prabhuewai9905

9 күн бұрын

​@@sandhyathapaofficial9617 khas bhaneko Race ( maanaw Jaati samudaya) ho - chhetri bhaneko hindu ko 4 jaat (caste) madhya ek ho!

@RavishPatel-q2t

Күн бұрын

The Fabricated Kirat Myth: Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Limbu-Kirat Connection Recent archaeological discoveries in Nepal have shed new light on the ancient history of the region, providing tangible evidence of the presence and influence of various ethnic groups. However, these findings directly contradict the mythical narrative of a unified "Kirat" kingdom or lineage that has been promoted by certain Limbu and Rai groups. Excavations of Licchavi period temples dedicated to Hindu deities like Shiva and Ram, as well as remnants of Khas Malla and Katyuri era architecture, clearly demonstrate the historical significance of Indo-Aryan cultures in Nepal. Numerous inscriptions in archaic forms of the Nepali language have been uncovered at these sites, attesting to the widespread use of Indo-Aryan languages long before the Limbus and Rais arrived in the region. In contrast, there is a complete lack of archaeological or epigraphic evidence linking the Limbus and Rais to any ancient "Kirat" civilization or kingdom. No Limbu or Rai inscriptions, temples, or other structures dating back more than a few centuries have been discovered. This stands in stark contrast to the abundant material proof of the Khas, Newar, and other Nepali ethnic groups' deep roots in the region. The Limbu and Rai claims of being the indigenous "Kirat" people are further undermined by historical records and linguistic analysis. Scholars have traced the migration of Limbu and Rai communities from Tibet and China to eastern Nepal and Sikkim only in the 13th-16th centuries CE, centuries after the Khas, Newar, and other groups had already established themselves in the region. In short, while the Khas, Newar, and other Nepali ethnicities have a well-documented history stretching back over a millennium, the Limbus and Rais are relative newcomers to the area. Their mythical "Kirat" narrative, promoted with the patronage of the British colonial authorities in Darjeeling, is not supported by any concrete archaeological, epigraphic, or historical evidence. It appears to be a fabrication designed to elevate the status of these groups at the expense of Nepal's true indigenous peoples. As more archaeological discoveries are made and historical research continues, the true diversity and complexity of Nepal's past is being uncovered. The Limbu and Rai "Kirat" myth is being systematically dismantled by the weight of empirical evidence. It is time to acknowledge the rich, multilayered history of Nepal's ethnic groups, rather than promoting the revisionist agenda of certain opportunistic communities.

@AbcDef-gw4dg

Күн бұрын

@@RavishPatel-q2t Kirat ka kyu baat kar rahe ho bhaiya ji, khas malla kings ke scription me om mane padme hum likha hota hai,

@AbcDef-gw4dg

Күн бұрын

@@sandhyathapaofficial9617 Sabai chhetri khas hoinan bhane k ho Chetri bhaneko khas bata brahmanical varna system ma enter gareko khas haru hun 47 lakh chhetri population cha nepal ma

खस राज्य रहेछ तर किन खस राज्यको कुरा गर्दा छेत्री जातहरु रिसाउने गर्छन्? अझै ब्राह्मण जातले झन घृणा गर्छन् ।

@basantbasnet5783

10 күн бұрын

Bahun harule xetry lato lai purai aafnu jal ma pareko xan yo jal ahile ka xety haru le ali ali bujhdai xan hamro bau hajur bau lai purai hatma ler kadhma teker tauko ma haer baseka thiye tar abo chaitesto nahin sakx kin bhane aaune pidi le nikai bujhn thaleka xan

तेसोभय हामी छेत्रीहरुत पियोर मुसलमानपो रहेछौं । हाम्रो धर्म नासियर हिन्दुपो भयका रहेछौं ।

@SajiloSchool

8 күн бұрын

लौन ! उतातिर अहिले मुस्लिमहरू भए भन्दैमा हामी मुसलमान भएर यता आएका होइनौँ ।

@SajiloSchool

8 күн бұрын

अहिलेको विश्वले अभ्यास गरिरहेको धर्म नयाँ हो । सबै !

@Machinejatt1234

5 күн бұрын

Khas haru irak iran tira huda muslim dharma failisakeko thiyena tesaile khas harulai islam dharma lee vetena ...

क।ल पनिक कथन हो खस भने को बर।मण ब।ट खसेर खटकेल। हुन भने कथन प।इछ

@SajiloSchool

9 күн бұрын

इतिहास नपढी सुनेको भरमा बोल्ने जति सबैले यही कुरा भन्छन् ।

5 Century mai khas rajya nepal ko pasxhim aisakyo tyo vanne k xa evidence,j boldine??😂😂 8-12 century bich ma ako history xa khas ko paschim dekhi paxi khasan ma shift ( ,karnali xetra) vako dekhinxa

Ka bata lera auxa yar yo khas ko history?? Kunai dna test garera vaneko ho ki aru le lekhdeko history lai true samjera vaneko ho?? Nagraj ka bata aye vanne kura nai tha xaina Nagraj Nepal tirai ka hun DNA test gare hunxa😂

खस को यो इतिहास मान्नु राम्रो होइन खस हरु आर्य नस्ल को होइन कस र ककसाइत सङ्ग गोरु बेचेको साईनो छैन खस हरु सेन्टल एसिया का हुन हुण हुणिक हुन

@SajiloSchool

12 күн бұрын

खसहरू वैदिक आर्य होइनन् । भिडियोमा खसलाई आर्य भनिएको पनि छैन । वैदिक आर्य र खसको सम्बन्ध अर्को भिडियोमा आउने छ ।

@AbcDef-gw4dg

12 күн бұрын

Bahun chhetri sabai khas hun

@sandhyathapaofficial9617

12 күн бұрын

@@SajiloSchool एउटै हो कस ककसेन भन्नू खासमा खस हरु याचे हो

@sandhyathapaofficial9617

12 күн бұрын

@@AbcDef-gw4dg होइन बाहुन कहिले खस हुन सक्दैन

@shishiradhikari6535

10 күн бұрын

खस भनेको सभ्यता हो र तिनीहरु को वर्ण आर्य हुन...वर्ण को आधारमा किन भने उनिहरु बाहुन क्षेत्री एक अर्का को जेरोक्स कपि हुन...

Khas vaneko ta shudra ho...khas avir kirat chamar jasta anya 10-12 jati shudra ho..paschim ma raja vaneka gurung magar thakuri ho...asali kshatriya ta gurung magar ra thakuri ho chatrapal vanney garthyo...khas rajya banauney vaneko jagdev chand maharaj suryaman singh gurung Narsingh nath rana magar milera 32000 sena laera alkanand kaveri ra godawari chetra ogatera katdai banaeko rajya..nagraj ko nam pachi chaleko challa bata malla bamma bam shahi hudai charidai gayo...paschim ma gurung magar thakuri vaneko thakurai garthey vaney khas jatima thapa padey khadka aru kei chahi kajai garthey ...chatrapal jastai gurung magar ra thakuri vaye purai area eneharuko under ma hunthyo maharaj ko pad ho ,chatra vaneko euta thau ko raja vayo ,tesai gari chatri vaneko senapati jastai thapa padey haru...

@SajiloSchool

10 күн бұрын

पहिलो कुरा त खसहरूमा वर्ण व्यवस्था नै थिएन । अर्को कुरा, Gurung भएर क्षेत्री हुँ भन्नु भएन । आफ्नो बारेमा बढीभन्दा बढी खोजी गरौँ न । तपाईँलाई सुदूर पश्चिम बारे जानकारी रहेनछ । तपाईंले भनेका मध्यपश्चिमका केही कुरा सही छन् ।

@Jayshreeram87679

10 күн бұрын

Timi Gurung haru bhotey anuhar. Paschim ko thakuri Aryan. Jpt nabolna kanxa.

@prabhuewai9905

9 күн бұрын

​@@SajiloSchoolthik bhannu bhayo. In laai gurung, magar, rai, limbu jaat barna byabastha maa pardainan bhanne gyaan rahenachha

यसरी राज्य गर्ने बहादुर खसहरु अहिले कता छन् त हाम्रो नेपालमा ??

@AmritAdhikari-rx3uy

7 күн бұрын

खसको बहादुरी लाइ बाहुनले प्रयोग गरेका छन् सर

1:10 yoo sunda achamma lagyo kati dherai name haru. ..... Khas haru lee 12 century tira buddhist raa 14century dekhi hindu mane pani they continue there masta culture .........tara jung bahadur lee khas haruko identity masta culture finish garna raa hardly hindunized garna ekdam vital role kheleko thiyo....jun din delhi khas harule masta dharma raa afulai xtri vanna thale tehi din Dekhi khas haru ekdam darxeruwa loser backwards tira gaye ....... Jun din karnali maa india bat thulo sankhya maa pakhe haru aaye khas haru ko kharab din suru vayo raa ekdamai patur vaye

@SajiloSchool

5 күн бұрын

Loved and liked this comment 🙏

@SajiloSchool

5 күн бұрын

पाँचौँ शताब्दीबाटनै खसहरू बोन र बौद्ध धर्मबाट प्रभावित हुन सुरु भएको देखिन्छ ।

@SajiloSchool

5 күн бұрын

मस्टोप्रतिको आस्था त निरन्तर छँदै छ ।

@Machinejatt1234

5 күн бұрын

@@SajiloSchool hoo ekdam sahi kuro khas raza haruko tibet sanga ramro sambanda thiyo ...... Tibeti Baudha margi haru bat nai khas harumaa Buudha raa Bon dharma aayeko dekhinxa ...tara reality maa taa khas haruko aafno original culture vaneko taa masta nai hoo.....Hindu Buddha Bon taa euta time period maa liyeko maneko dharma hoo

Kashmir ke Bhatt log khud ko kash bolte hai

Khas haru buddhist thiye , ra masto kuldevata huncha

@sandhyathapaofficial9617

12 күн бұрын

हो बुद्ध पनि पन्छी मानेको हो सबै भन्दा पहिला बोन परम्परा हो जब बुद्धि जम आयो अनि बोन र मष्टो अलग भो

@southnepalimovie

11 күн бұрын

Naam nai nagraj Hindu ko xa . ​@@sandhyathapaofficial9617

@pratikking2272

11 күн бұрын

Golyu devta mancha. Masto bakwas ho. Buddhist lai hatya garthiye khas le

@sudhirjungthapa8992

11 күн бұрын

​@@pratikking2272 ka ko itihas vandai xas Buddhist Lai hatya garne khas le Lumbini rw soyambu ma dan diyera aafno nam lekhauxa ani kakre Bihar banauxa 😂

@pratikking2272

11 күн бұрын

@@sudhirjungthapa8992 tibet ko bhote lai marne ra western tibet ma raj garne khas ho. Khas malla haru antin ma gaera anti buddhist banchan. dherai buddhist kp hatya garchan

Shab jhuta anuman mangante kura ho

You are little off. Khazaks are mixed breed of both Mongoloid and Caucasian race and It has nothing to do with Khas.

@SajiloSchool

11 күн бұрын

खस नै mixed breed होइन । तपाईँले भन्नुभए जस्तो खसहरू बसाइँसराइ गरिरहँदा अरू जातिसँग सम्पर्क रहेर अन्य उपजाति बनेको तर्क सही छ ।

@SandeshKushwaha-tl2fd

11 күн бұрын

The Rais and Limbus were initially primitive tribes in eastern Nepal, often described as nomadic and lacking a structured society. However, their fortunes changed dramatically under British rule. The British, seeking reliable local allies, favored the Rais and Limbus, who in return supported British geopolitical interests, particularly in Sikkim. This patronage allowed the Rais and Limbus to gain significant socio-political leverage, which they used to further their own agendas. Conflict Between Lepchas and Bhutias in Sikkim The Lepchas and Bhutias have long been the primary ethnic groups in Sikkim. The Bhutia Chogyals ruled Sikkim for centuries, with the Lepchas playing a significant role in the kingdom's cultural and social fabric. However, the arrival and subsequent rise of the Rais and Limbus disrupted this balance. The Rais and Limbus employed a strategy of divide and rule, learned from their British allies. They fabricated narratives suggesting a shared origin between the Lepchas and Limbus, aiming to weaken the unity between Lepchas and Bhutias. By claiming that Lepchas and Limbus were the same people, they sought to undermine Bhutia dominance and create an ethnic rift. Moreover, the Limbus introduced a writing script purportedly derived from Tibetan and Lepcha sources, furthering their claim to a shared heritage with the Lepchas. The Bhutias, being relatively isolated mountain people, struggled to counter these sophisticated manipulations. The resulting confusion and mistrust between the Lepchas and Bhutias weakened their collective resistance against external influences, including those of the Rais and Limbus. Instigating Conflict Between Chettri and Brahmin in Nepal In Nepal, the Rais and Limbus attempted to exploit existing social hierarchies to create discord between the Chettri and Brahmin communities. The Chettris and Brahmins, both belonging to the Khas Arya group, have traditionally held significant political and social influence in Nepal. By fabricating stories and spreading rumors, the Rais and Limbus aimed to pit these two communities against each other. This divide-and-rule tactic involved highlighting and exacerbating minor disputes and differences, thus fostering a climate of mistrust and rivalry. The objective was to destabilize the socio-political cohesion of the dominant groups, thereby creating opportunities for the Rais and Limbus to assert their influence. Creating Division Between Shrestha and Maharjan The Shrestha and Maharjan communities, integral to the Newar society of Kathmandu Valley, were not immune to the machinations of the Rais and Limbus. By manipulating historical narratives and exploiting social tensions, the Rais and Limbus sought to create divisions within the Newar community. The Shresthas, typically of higher social status, and the Maharjans, primarily involved in agriculture and trade, were targeted through a campaign of misinformation and fabricated grievances. This strategy aimed to weaken the unity of the Newar community, making it easier for the Rais and Limbus to advance their interests.

@prabhuewai9905

9 күн бұрын

​@@SandeshKushwaha-tl2fdif their fortune changed that is good. Why are you so jealous? Did they do something bad to you?

Ppppp009

नेपालको इतिहास र पाकिस्तानको इतिहास एउटै हो ।

@Axisclub123

9 күн бұрын

Jhanta kasari same chha pakistan ta 70 sal agadi sthapit bhayeko ho😂😂😂😂

@BAJRARUDRAAWATAR

9 күн бұрын

पाकिस्थान मा बौद्धको नरसंहार भएर, बौद्ध,धर्मवाल्मवि लुप्त भइ सके, गुम्बा सवै भगनावशेष मात्र पाइन्छ, केहि हिन्दु र मन्दिर त अस्त्तित्वको लागी लड्दै छन् । तसर्थ नेपालमा हिन्दु र बौद्ध राजाले केवल राजा संग लडे, संगसगै हिन्दु र बौद्ध पनि आज सम्म छन् बल्ल गणत्नत्र पछि विदेसि युरेपि, अमेरिकि, अरवि हरुले अब्राहिम , इसाई, मुसलमान को लागि राम्रो वातवरण गराउन साथ साथै लेफ्टिस्ट, कम्युनिष्ट सवै मिलेर नै हिन्दु र बौद्ध विच लडाउन खोजे पनि सकिरहेको छैन्न तर इसाई, मुसलमानमा कन्वरट गराउने, भएका छन् , गरिरहेका छन् । रोहिंगिया, वंगालि, पाकिस्थानि, इन्डियन त धेरै छिराएको छन् लडाउन, हिसा गराउन तर पाकिस्थानमा सवै पुराखाको धर्म छोडे्र जिहादको लागी लडिरहेछन् ।

@leonaliya

8 күн бұрын

Vutro ko jihad Muji khas k ho mazza liy bujya xas​@@BAJRARUDRAAWATAR

Yes, it's true Newa: call Khayn to Khas likewise Barmu to Bahun, Sayn to Rai, Limbu, Sherpa, Tamang, Marsya to people from Madhes and Maga: to Magars

Khas hoina hola arya hola khas haru ta Ahile sabai bahun bhaisake bcoz same face , natra Khas haru budhisth thiye Ahile hindu kasari vaye?

सिरिप मुखले कहानी मात्रै सुनयेर हुन्छ बिना कुनै evidence खस र बहुन बारत बाट नेपाल प्रबेस गरेको देखिन्छ तेस्को उदहरन हो बारतको बिबिन्न बुवागम खस र बहुन जतिहरु हुनु नेपालमा बन्द देरै खस र बहुनहरु छन बारतम

@sudhirjungthapa8992

11 күн бұрын

Khas haru India Ko Uttarakhand rw Himachal tira matra xan maidani vubag ma khas haru baseko paidena. Himachal ko jounshari khas Lai aadibasi janajati ko suchi ma rakhxa ani Uttarakhand ma OBC ma rakhxa. Khas haru vedic Arya hoinan farak hun ani kun parmad le khas Lai bahun sanga jodeko khas rw bahun eutai ho vanne kunai euta parmad dinu ta

@sudhirjungthapa8992

11 күн бұрын

Evidence K chaiyo Sila lekh Tibetan bansawali tamrapatra , Tibetan gumba haru ko abilekh K chaiyo khas haru ko chhetri bahun Vanda farak itihas xa

@SandeshKushwaha-tl2fd

11 күн бұрын

The Rais and Limbus were initially primitive tribes in eastern Nepal, often described as nomadic and lacking a structured society. However, their fortunes changed dramatically under British rule. The British, seeking reliable local allies, favored the Rais and Limbus, who in return supported British geopolitical interests, particularly in Sikkim. This patronage allowed the Rais and Limbus to gain significant socio-political leverage, which they used to further their own agendas. Conflict Between Lepchas and Bhutias in Sikkim The Lepchas and Bhutias have long been the primary ethnic groups in Sikkim. The Bhutia Chogyals ruled Sikkim for centuries, with the Lepchas playing a significant role in the kingdom's cultural and social fabric. However, the arrival and subsequent rise of the Rais and Limbus disrupted this balance. The Rais and Limbus employed a strategy of divide and rule, learned from their British allies. They fabricated narratives suggesting a shared origin between the Lepchas and Limbus, aiming to weaken the unity between Lepchas and Bhutias. By claiming that Lepchas and Limbus were the same people, they sought to undermine Bhutia dominance and create an ethnic rift. Moreover, the Limbus introduced a writing script purportedly derived from Tibetan and Lepcha sources, furthering their claim to a shared heritage with the Lepchas. The Bhutias, being relatively isolated mountain people, struggled to counter these sophisticated manipulations. The resulting confusion and mistrust between the Lepchas and Bhutias weakened their collective resistance against external influences, including those of the Rais and Limbus. Instigating Conflict Between Chettri and Brahmin in Nepal In Nepal, the Rais and Limbus attempted to exploit existing social hierarchies to create discord between the Chettri and Brahmin communities. The Chettris and Brahmins, both belonging to the Khas Arya group, have traditionally held significant political and social influence in Nepal. By fabricating stories and spreading rumors, the Rais and Limbus aimed to pit these two communities against each other. This divide-and-rule tactic involved highlighting and exacerbating minor disputes and differences, thus fostering a climate of mistrust and rivalry. The objective was to destabilize the socio-political cohesion of the dominant groups, thereby creating opportunities for the Rais and Limbus to assert their influence. Creating Division Between Shrestha and Maharjan The Shrestha and Maharjan communities, integral to the Newar society of Kathmandu Valley, were not immune to the machinations of the Rais and Limbus. By manipulating historical narratives and exploiting social tensions, the Rais and Limbus sought to create divisions within the Newar community. The Shresthas, typically of higher social status, and the Maharjans, primarily involved in agriculture and trade, were targeted through a campaign of misinformation and fabricated grievances. This strategy aimed to weaken the unity of the Newar community, making it easier for the Rais and Limbus to advance their interests.

@sudhirjungthapa8992

11 күн бұрын

@@SandeshKushwaha-tl2fd ehh yrr Nepal ma 1910 Vanda aagadi katai Ni khas haru le aafulai chhetri vanekoi xaina

@sandhyathapaofficial9617

11 күн бұрын

नेपालको पुरानो जाती खस(याचे) (मगर,गुरुङ ,तामाङ ,नेवार ,) फेरि सबै होईन खसम मा पनि मिसियका छ मगरमा पनि तामाङ मा पनि नेवार मा पनि र खस(याचे) को नजिकको सम्बन्ध जाती समूह भनेको मगर गुरुङ तामाङ हो अहिले क्षेत्री भएर आफ्नो परिचय भुल्नु सामान्य कुरा हो हामी खस ( याचे हुण हुणिक ) हो र तिब्बत हुन को देश हो हुण ओफ the leld हो हाम्रो थियो पहिला

😮