The images being produced by the JWST just keep getting better. The Pandora’s Cluster, for one, is utterly stunning. Bearing in mind that some of the galaxies shown are being seen as there were within a comparatively short time following the so-called Big Bang beggars belief! The warped space-time enables even older structures to be observed. This Deep Field image is really beautiful, and filled with an enormous amount of detail, structure and mind-blowing things to consider. As always, Chris, many thanks for sharing this image with your viewers, it is fabulous!

5:47 Just a note, JWST does not see exclusively in infrared and used the NIRcam for this image, which sees from .6 to 5 microns so this image does have some overlap with the visible spectrum which is why it looks like an image from the HST with all the colors shifted bluer because the things that look reddish in the HST image look white in JWST.

It’s so cool to think how each of the galaxies could have many civilizations. Imagine any of them just having a million years or even a billion years of technological and evolutionary advancements on us. Or maybe intelligent life and life in general are incredibly rare and they’re all just empty.

Thank you Chris,. I enjoy all your presentations 👍

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much! :) 🚀

WOW ! Money well spent on the JWST. Looking forward to seeing even longer exposure times.

Wow another video with heartwinning explanation... The team hasn't released any image of Uranus.. I should have been released till the end of January.

Let's see what Euclid can do. Of course JWST can look further, but Euclid has got the field of view and observation time to observe millions of galaxies.

I love all these deep field images 😍

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

Me too!

Awe inspiring images!

I've been waiting for this for a while. Thanks Chris. Keep it up

Thank you sir for your amazingly awesome, astronomical videos.

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much!

@StaticBlaster

Жыл бұрын

@@ChrisPattisonCosmo 👍

🌬 🌌 🪐 Me thinks you gott the JWST and Hubble images mislabeled with each other❓️ ⁉️🤔🤨 .. the images labelled Hubble are showing much clearer resolution ⁉️ 😳😖

Stellar 😃

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

🤣🚀🌌

Thanks Chris. Excellent vid as always.👍

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! :)

Awesome content Chris! Keep it up 💪

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much!

Great video, as always

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much! 😍

@DanBeech-ht7sw

Жыл бұрын

@@ChrisPattisonCosmo evening Chris, I've just read a brief article about the JWST image of WR124, which is about to go supernova. The article (in the Guardian) is sketchy - can you shed any more light (groan) on it?

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

@@DanBeech-ht7sw Ha, I'm delighted to say that a video is coming on it tonight :) haven't seen my article tbh, but when the video is out let me know if you have questions!

@DanBeech-ht7sw

Жыл бұрын

@@ChrisPattisonCosmo I'm looking out for it

Why do I feel so small? 😮 "Let there be light" ... Righhht???!😅

Those specks that are seemingly in the furthest distances against the otherwise black background appear to look whiteish. They don't have diffraction spikes, so I assume that they are galaxies. Distant galaxies that are a bit bigger are red. Does this mean that those specks are actually smaller dwarf-like galaxies and much closer? Are there larger ground telescopes that can resolve those "specks"?

Seems like there are freaking big hole and sucking all the galaxies and throwing to out of our space. This is seems like a sink closed hole and full with water. İf you take of the sink cover water when go to hole shape going to whirlpool. Exactly the same😊

It's becoming increasingly clear that we are at the atomic level of all this.

@SamS-sn4uu

Жыл бұрын

Do not rule out the possibility of a simulation

I'm wondering if the stars (the ones in the milky way) in the foreground also make any significant gravitational lensing? If not I'm guessing that they aren't massive enough to create a lensing effect that would be significant ?

@tonywells6990

Жыл бұрын

Yes, it's called microlensing and can be used to detect the motions of exoplanets around the star, as well as looking for things like primordial black holes and dark matter or things like black holes/rogue planets/neutron stars (MACHO's).

Is it just me or JWST vs Hubble comparison looks nearly the same, or even in favor of Hubble

@awesomefeldmanfamily

Жыл бұрын

Same fam, Hubble's deep fields exposure time was like 2 weeks while JWST 's was like 5 hours, I feel like they should leave JWST's exposure open for 2 weeks and then that will be a real comparison

@awesomefeldmanfamily

Жыл бұрын

I think right now they are just taking these short "deep fields" for data collection because there are lots of people who want to use the telescope and this is a quick way to get lots of data for a lot of people in a short amount of time. I think in a few years or so they will actually do a really long exposure and those will look much cooler than these

@jcarroll276

Жыл бұрын

@@awesomefeldmanfamily it's a very popular telescope and time is scarce. It has many scientists who have targets they want to further study who have booked spots for it. It probably won't be able to focus on an exposure for weeks at a time for a long time and it would need to be an important target

@dr_0lethros

Жыл бұрын

​@@awesomefeldmanfamily the hubble image was done in 11 days (taking 400 orbits around earth) and this giant image was taken over 30 hours (in 6 hour segments). I mean, the XDF that Hubble did uncovered an additional 5,000 galaxies, on top of the original 10,000 from the UDF, but.. Sadly, that is absolutely nothing in comparison to the JWST.. Which uncovered something along the lines of 50,000 sources of infrared light. Also, I believe if they leave the exposures running in one area for too long it just introduces additional noise - there's certainly a limit before they hit diminishing returns.

@Chadillac-xq7xk

Жыл бұрын

With the naked eye, you are correct. The important thing about James Webb is the data that comes from these photos. Learning more about the beginnings of the universe is the really great think about them.

Forgive me, but I am not seeing that great a difference in the images at 3:19 given the technology upgrade and expense.

Call me stupid but I just don't see the HUGE difference between Hubble and JWST you keep extolling. The two spiral galaxy comparison in this vid isn't better. I must be looking at the wrong things. I see more details in the Hubble image on the spiral itself, more clearly defined stars, and just a better look/feel. This seems to be the case with a bunch of the JWST images you've shown. Could you please be more specific with these comparisons? How is JWST better in specifics? The whole field is more populated, so I don't mean that. So many of the JWST galaxies look fussy, blurry, and just out of focus -- how is that an improvement from Hubble? I know you know this stuff but I just don't get it.

@ngc-fo5te

Жыл бұрын

JWST is primarily an infra-red instrument - Hubble was not.

Even at a distance of 3.5 billion light-years, many galaxies appear close together. Some are adjacent, some are as far from each other as a galaxy, some are a few galaxies. This image does not support the expanding universe theory. It does not support the big bang theory. I think each galaxy was created separately, independently of the others. I think these images show an expanding universe with the creation and addition of new galaxies, not the universe expanding like a balloon.

I've said it before and I will say it again...No matter how far away they can see with a powerful telescope there will always see more and more of the same that has been seen before. There is no limit to the Universe that any telescope made will ever "see". The cosmologists who have been saying for a lot of years that the Universe had a beginning that happened by an almost magical set of circumstances in a tiny "singularity" that got so hot that it blew up into all that now constitutes what we call the Universe should stop trying to formulate what exists and why and study the facts as they are discovered. They should also stop trying to squeeze what we do "know" into a tidy mathematical equasion so they have it all figured out. They are not as smart as they think, no matter how educated they may be and how much they "think they know."

@ngc-fo5te

Жыл бұрын

"There is no limit to the Universe that any telescope made will ever "see"." - well that's not true.

If you closely observe the edge of your own finger, you can see gravitational lensing with your eyes. The light bends I tiny bit around the edges of everything with mass.

@filonin2

Жыл бұрын

No, that is not true in any way which is why it took looking at star very near the Sun during an eclipse to prove it. You, if you are not hallucinating, are seeing diffraction.

Per isse earth ka Kya fayda 😂

Am i the only one that gets a bit intellectually displaced by looking too long at these deep field images?

Do not rule out the possibility that this is a simulation. It will take a strong mind but do not rule it out.

First comment!

@ChrisPattisonCosmo

Жыл бұрын

Woohoo!

You're not very good at telling what's to see.