For those looking for more justice, she will not be a judge come December 31st. She ran for re-election, but lost to her own party in the primary on March 1st.

@chadhulsizer

2 жыл бұрын

Great work, this is the thing that needs to happen all a crossed the nation.

@ScottAlanBecker38

2 жыл бұрын

Now sue her worthless self for violation of civil rights.

@noneed8882

2 жыл бұрын

She didn’t lose by much. She had 45% of the vote. I’m assuming the people voting for her didn’t know what she did.

@OmniscientWarrior

2 жыл бұрын

At least the people can further remove her to show her how they feel a judge should hold themselves in the court room.

@circeciernova1712

2 жыл бұрын

And of course, until then she faces fewer consequences than usual for her behavior, knowing she's about to be replaced anyway

I guarantee this judge has ruined a lot of lives

@jupitercyclops6521

2 жыл бұрын

Yep. & never , ever any lost sleep

@win4jesse

2 жыл бұрын

Yes sir…the good news is she lost the primary so by the end of the year she can ruin no more

@admthrawnuru

2 жыл бұрын

Bad judges, prosecutors, and cops ruin more lives than criminals do.

@mikepalmer2219

2 жыл бұрын

I am starting to think there are way more people wrongly prosecuted than I ever thought. I always knew it was a huge problem but I think it has been way more than I thought possible.

@marquisdelafayette1929

2 жыл бұрын

Tsk tsk tsk = how judges “discipline” each other, behind closed doors. This is the disconnect between the elite and everyone else. You have someone like this who was ignored or hurt by someone at some point in her life and has decided to use her power to hurt everyone else. Hurt people, hurt people.

“The judge lectured him on his professionalism” ooooooohhhh the irony. It’s hurts so good.

I'd call that "Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law". That judge should not only be removed from the bench and disbarred, but also arrested, charged and put in prison for her crimes.

@5400bowen

Жыл бұрын

False imprisonment.

@kirm8137

4 ай бұрын

Rules for me and rules for thee. The new golden rule.

@rex8255

Ай бұрын

Frankly, it sounds like the Bailiff should spend a little time on the other side of the bars as well. The whole "I vaz on following ze orderz" defense was done away with in the Nuremberg war crimes trials (also, an EXCELLENT city to visit if you're ever in Germany)

Family court: where the constitution goes to die

@knghtbrd

2 жыл бұрын

I see people scoff at "men's rights" advocacy. They ought to pay attention to what goes on in family court more often. Just from hearing the story, I can just about guarantee you, in this DISHONORABLE judge's courtroom, men in particular will have no rights whatsoever. And hers isn't the only family court you can say that about. Not by far. There are a lot of rotten husbands and deadbeat dads out there to be sure, and I can't say I feel too sorry for them when they lose, if they lose fairly according to the law. Why should I, under those circumstances? But too often family courts exist to enable, encourage, and sometimes coerce women to exploit men and inflict the maximum harm upon them at times in direct contradiction to uncontested facts in evidence. He's got a good job and home, a good network, and a stable environment. She is an addict who cheated on him with her pusher and lives in squalor with utilities that have been turned off three times in six months after she was fired from her job for endangering people while high. SOLE CUSTODY to mom, no visitation rights because he tried at one point to go through her things once before the divorce (looking for those drugs to destroy them), and hey mom, if you do this, this, and this you can maximize spousal and child support. How's that just or in the best interest of the child? I wish that was an exaggeration. Literally that has happened. You just shake your head and say family court is broken, because it is.

@lpd1snipe

2 жыл бұрын

You got that right brother been-there-done-that!

@SlyNine

Ай бұрын

Brought to you by people like Ellen Pence, and feminists like her.

@JeffSherlock

Ай бұрын

Exactly, coast to coast.

FAMILY COURT JUDGE???!!! Ah, now it all makes sense! Those judges walk all over Fifth Amendment rights of ALL defendants!

@shawnwatson1419

2 жыл бұрын

Every right in fact. Family Court is a shit show against due process itself more times than not. They do not abide by their own rules or codes here in Texas.

@michigangeezer3950

2 жыл бұрын

Ingham county was a crapfest when I divorced 20 years ago. Friend of the Court workers with Bar numbers interrupting me (talking over me repeatedly) after demanding I answer questions. I always wondered if lawyers shouting people down so they can't answer questions could be something the State Bar could address.

@killman369547

2 жыл бұрын

@@shawnwatson1419 Family courts in my country are just as insane. They're basically rebranded star chambers. And my family wonders why i'm not very enthusiastic about having a family.

@mattc2582

2 жыл бұрын

No not all just men.

@blue39503

2 жыл бұрын

Seems to be a lot of personal beliefs cloud the judgement of the judges in these courtrooms.

So she doesn't have to incriminate herself when she's asked about her actions but when the attorney does the same exact thing he gets cuffed to the jury box. 🤔

@watcherofthingsthatrkekano5930

2 жыл бұрын

Rules for thee not for me

@stonep11

2 жыл бұрын

Did you hear him say, Judges and Attorneys are held to a hire standard? Lol well maybe hire than like a cop or something, but not in anyway more than a normal person. Imagine if a shift manager shackled a cashier to the checkout line because they yelled at a shopper, OUTSIDE of the store, they would be fired from their job, locked up, and held individually liable in civil court.

@LucifersDeathSquad

2 жыл бұрын

@@stonep11 A "Hire" standard ? 😆

@ProleDaddy

2 жыл бұрын

Capitalism is entirely based upon hypocrisy.

@stonep11

2 жыл бұрын

@@LucifersDeathSquad autocorrect is cruel

It's ironic to hear a judge be called "honorable" when they are accused of misconduct.

@lisat9707

Жыл бұрын

Yessa! Our elected leaders here are called honorable. So n so...... Well this one went to the local homeless shelter drunk as a skunk and started to tell and swear at the people sleeping there. So. News agency. The Right honourable Ralf Slime was escorted out of the. Someday sometime homeless shelter after swearing and causing a disturbance while visibly intoxicated. Oh the irony😂

@GorillaCrewWarGaming

Жыл бұрын

@@lisat9707 ?!

@spikenomoon

Жыл бұрын

yes your Dishonarable

@Freja_Solstheim

13 күн бұрын

HonoRabble.

The judge should be arrested for illegal detainment. Plus those cases should be marked as mistrials.

"Your honor, In the hallway I was practicing my First Amendment under both constitutional and common law. A forced involuntary apology would be a violation of my 5th amendment rights, judical ethics, and due a disservice to the court and my client by force of the government, in a free country." She put him in timeout. Shameful.

It still baffles me that a judge can be considered allowed to compel speech...

@mattc2582

2 жыл бұрын

What you gonna do about it? That's a literal question. Comparing in KZread is fun but that asshat is sitting there making 6 figures and only working 20 hrs a week

How is anyone supposed to get a fair hearing if their attorney is shackled?

A forced apology is not an apology, it's empty words to appease an aggrieved person.🤷‍♀️ The judge sounds like a piece of work...🤦‍♀️

@UNSCPILOT

2 жыл бұрын

In any other position they'd likely be on trial *AS* a criminal

@youdontgnomie5197

2 жыл бұрын

@@UNSCPILOT no kidding! The fact that she got the equivalent to grandma shaking her finger in your face to taking a cookie before dinner is disgusting!

@virt1one

2 жыл бұрын

I think the point of a forced apology is to humiliate the person, deflate their ego, or impress upon them their lack of control over the person they are apologizing to. It's not really about "saying you're sorry" so much as it is about the effect the apology will have on the person making the apology. On a playground, if a kid is being aggressive and is forced to apologize, it does reduce the likelihood of them continuing to be aggressive, at least for a short time until the humiliation wears off. (which may actually lead to a "rebound" effect later) I've had a bully come back to me later, still upset that I 'got him humiliated' - "you did it to yourself" isn't usually received well at that point. But this just sounds to me like a power-tripping judge, which I find rather amusing since a judge ALREADY can freely wield a good deal of power. It leads me to wonder if both issues involved the same "court staff member". (where the first incident was "reported" by the same member) and that the judge maybe has some favored interest in that member?

@brentbeacham9691

Жыл бұрын

An apology is either accepted or rejected by the receiver. If accepted then it’s enough. If rejected then it’s not enough. Even if it’s a lie.

@darrellwilliams5657

8 ай бұрын

They feel they r above the law, bc they r the law.

It's weird that everyone knows about judges lying and abusing power yet not very much happens to rectify the injustice.

The fact that we have court reporters is probably one of the most important parts of the legal system.

@mikepalmer2219

2 жыл бұрын

That’s a damn good point.

@mattc2582

2 жыл бұрын

Yea but it's selective outrage. They only make a big deal if it aligns with the ideology. Not facts and reality

@SeraphicSolicitor

2 жыл бұрын

@@mattc2582 The majority of court "reporters", at least in my state, are literally just volunteers/pre-law students who sit in a courtroom and tick boxes if they notice something off-procedure and count how many times judges do certain things or pass certain sentences, which then gets passed on to people who might actually report on it. I suppose, in a sense you have to have an agenda to care enough to look because the whole process is mind-numbing in many ways and sitting in court for days is a great way to get exposed to a large amount of human misery. There's no way there's actual full-time paid news reporters sitting in all courtrooms all the time because that's just not a wise or even feasible use of resources.

@Blue-hf7xt

Жыл бұрын

A recent case in California, the judge removed the court recorder and turned off zoom.

@dawnmcr802

4 ай бұрын

15:19 Truer words were never spoken.

If I order an armed man in my employ to restrain someone, against his will, and relocate him to another place of my choosing, that's kidnapping +/- conspiracy to commit. Using a threat of force to order someone to say anything whatsoever is threatening, assault, menacing, or some other crime depending on the jurisdiction. And that's not even in a context where the action unjustly hinders the person from providing legal representation to someone else. Obviously the motives here aren't the same as a "typical" criminal's motives, but these acts are against the law for a reason. It's fundamentally wrong to do these things to people. Doing them capriciously in a courtroom undermines everything the court is supposed to represent. This judge needs to be off the bench, disbarred, and at a defendant's table. It's not like she can claim ignorance of the rules. She flagrantly violated them and in the process violated the civil rights of the attorneys she victimized, and their clients' rights too.

@Tomm9y

2 жыл бұрын

These motives are far more serious than real or imagined motives. The system which allows judges to have this level of power is at fault. Those who appoint, manage, regulate and influence the judiciary are at fault. The same pattern of legal over-reach pervades legislation and legal/justice industry.

@mattc2582

2 жыл бұрын

Accountability is kryptonite to gov

This is exactly why we need to be allowed to record in Court and judicial immunity needs to go away

@adamf663

2 жыл бұрын

Records are made of every word uttered and not explicitly stricken. Often cases involve sensitive matters.

@SmittyAZ

2 жыл бұрын

Of course, there has to be exceptions to attending and recording proceedings: Rape, incest, under 18 years old, etc. (Just don't get caught secretly recording.) I've seen where they interpret the 'no recording in the courtroom during a trial' to mean the entire courthouse building and also, the entire steps and sidewalks outside. The Judge that issues such orders know that it won't stand, if appealed? BTW - I was denied a transcript of one of my appearances when I argued with a Judge and he was wrong. During sentencing, he 'corrected' himself but denied he had previously spouted his BS. He knew I was going to use it to somehow embarrass him.

@johnwesley256

2 жыл бұрын

@@adamf663 for court transcripts they usually cost over $100, so if you take it all the way to trial it'll cost over $1000. Also transcripts can be wrong and can be "lost". Where I live they don't always have someone doing it until after the preliminary and they only keep them for 2 years. And of course there should be exceptions

@lisat9707

Жыл бұрын

​@@johnwesley256 🤔Digital age. Is it possible to have the case recorded but sealed in a SSD that needs a physical encryption key for the victim or 3 people with part of a key each... One being the local Coroner.... Or something. Just in case there is a desperate future need for it. Then again Government..... Its bound to be Messed up🥴

@georgedunkelberg5004

Ай бұрын

@@adamf663 VIDEO AND AUDIO 100% PUBLIC ACCESSABLE IS CITIZEN JUSTICE MANDATED!

So the judge refuses to speak, yet says she will hold some one in contempt if he does not answer her!? Then goes on to illegally shackle and imprison him, and another, yet is just reprimanded! That there shows one of the things thsat is wrong. The judge broke the law. yet is not hel accountable.

Just a thought: If this judge treats the attorneys appearing before her like this, then what was her treatment of the parties appearing before her? Given this is a family court judge, perhaps this incident is only scratching the surface.

She should be given a felony record and do double the time for what she would give someone for violating a restraining order. Officials should be held accountable to double the level they are responsible for.

A judge *ordering* the lawyer to apologize also clearly falls under government compelled speech. Needs to be off the bench immediately. Judicial immunity needs massive reform.

@markburton5292

2 жыл бұрын

don't vote a judge like that back in.

@TheBrothermark

2 жыл бұрын

Let the punishment fit the crime. Put her in stocks in the courthouse parking lot and let the public rotten egg and tomato the s*** out of her first ...

@warrendriscoll350

2 жыл бұрын

Well, I mean, technically it is compelled speech. I assume this is a joke though.

@creanero

2 жыл бұрын

@@markburton5292 locking up lawyers is likely to gain this judge many votes, especially in a small community. This is why electing judges is a lunatic idea.

@garyschoolcraft587

2 жыл бұрын

@@warrendriscoll350 I was under the impression that this was all entirely sincere. Would appreciate a clarification from @Chilly Jack because I think that this sort of behavior is really serious. I believe she really should be off the bench for this abuse of power alone. The shackling is an extra layer of misconduct.

Reminds me of the recent judge who committed all sorts of malfeasance such as issuing bench warrants for failure to appear when they weren't required to appear. She blamed it all on going through menopause.

@knghtbrd

2 жыл бұрын

I remember that judge. At least she was removed from the bench. This one gets a finger-wagging apparently.

@jupitercyclops6521

2 жыл бұрын

Wouldn't hold up for a citizens excuse or defense

@A_itsar

2 жыл бұрын

Isn't menopause like forever? So she's gonna act like this until she dies

@mhfuzzball

2 жыл бұрын

Ah, yes, Pinky Carr. Steve did two videos on her.

@mikehilbert9349

2 жыл бұрын

It make me think of the "Psycho" by Caroline's Spine.

The government has put in many layers to protect themselves from any type of accountability. They all work together, they all have each other's backs.

I think all judges should be reminded, on a regular basis, that it is not in fact *their* freaking courtroom.

We need to bring back the pillory as a punishment for public officials like this.

@benwagner5089

2 жыл бұрын

At least with the pillory, common people would know that the person is being punished. With a "public reprimand," that's only going to come to light to the people who read that specific article entry. If this was any other job, you'd be suspended/fired, docked pay, or the job changed to a lower paying one; something where it would truly hurt your bank account and record it in your HR dealings.

@ChillyJack

2 жыл бұрын

@@benwagner5089 If it was a private individual instead of a government employee they'd be *arrested* for false imprisonment.

@oliviafox6745

Ай бұрын

You mean pillory, as in rotten tomatoes and cabbages?

WOW-- lying judge gonna get judged. Unbelievable!

I had a delivery of 2000 books dropped off at my business when I was not there. I had left instructions for where the skid was to be left clearly marked with a huge X and a note. The skid was where I wanted it, but it had fallen over and a lot of the books were crushed and damaged. The shipment was insured but the insurance company refused to pay for the damage, the printer was also insured and also did not pay for the damage, the delivery company said this wasn't their fault - I sued. The day I arrived at small claims court I was surprised to find that the other party was no longer required to show up due to new rules. I had my evidence with me, photos of the damage, a box of damaged books, and my case notes with all my information, etc., and a new suit to wear, this was not my first time. I went ahead with my evidence and was interrupted by this new judge I had never seen before. I used to go to court often for my employer, when members didn't pay their fees and enjoyed it. This judge kept interrupting me, asked questions, cut me off when I answered and wouldn't allow me to show my damaged books or photos. I started to get a bit steamed up and was out of sorts because the process I was used to wan't happening. I started to interrupt the judge and even told him to let me finish a sentence. He got angry right away and told me that if I didn't shut up I'd be held in contempt. I didn't take that well. In the end I let him tell me how this wasn't the fault of the delivery company, blah, blah, blah and that he would judge in my favor for about a tenth of what the damage came to. Since it cost $180 to file the complaint, cab fair to and from court, this was a waste of my time. The company refused to pay me, the court no longer deals with that, but did a week later when I threatened to picket their place of business, which I have done successfully before. I can believe that a judge will do something ridiculous all day long. The judge I had for years, who used to preside over the court room used to fall asleep for a few minutes here, missing critical information yet nobody mentioned it. Also, he would tell me that he liked my dress or that I looked nice and I'd know that I had won that case. Courts are theater and really scary if you are innocent of a crime and you are stuck in that weird system.

@thomasbrogan9102

2 жыл бұрын

Hmm

@mattc2582

2 жыл бұрын

Yea, as a woman you got to play on easy mode. Imagine the same treatment 10x but they're holding your child hostage and demanding random... Not just a few books in the floor.

@richardfabacher3705

Ай бұрын

Law School Wisdom: "A" students practice law "B" students become law professors "C" students become judges

Cruel and unusual punishment. Denying somebody legal representation. The fact this judge won't see the inside of a prison cell is yet another example of why myself and so many other have lost all respect for the legal system. The hypocrisy is too blatant to demand any respect.

" I wasn't aware that he was shackled" Legit question: is this judge blind? Like literally blind, not rhetoricaly or figuratively? If there is someone shackled in her courtroom...she saw them.

@cycleboy8028

2 жыл бұрын

Also goes to ineptitude... not in control/observant of her courtroom.

@yaqbulyakkerbat4190

2 жыл бұрын

just corrupt

@ropersonline

2 жыл бұрын

This insufficient forthrightness is in itself an issue, because judges are to conduct themselves to a higher standard.

@michigangeezer3950

2 жыл бұрын

Most courtrooms have CCTV going all day long. Let's see her watching the cuffs going on.

@volkswagenginetta

2 жыл бұрын

if a judge does not have the ability to identify every single person who is in custody in their court room do not have the mental/physical fortitude to remain a judge. Does she not understand when she orders someone to be restrained and moved to somewhere else in the court room that they would not be considered under custody and handcuffed? Is that something she really didnt know was going to happen? How are you qualified to run a court if something as basic as custody if you do not understand the entire chain of what will happen? If they lied they also shouldn't be a judge. So either This judge is incompitent, blind, or lying, all not great things for a judge

Here's my thought, say you're in that courtroom, and it's your attorney that is now being shackled like a dog to the jury box. How is that going to play to any jury that's in there when they see a person's attorney getting arrested and shackled. That's not going to go real well for that particular attorney whether prosecution or defense. My thought is is wouldn't those cases then be thrown out on a mistrial at the very least?

@wingracer1614

2 жыл бұрын

I don't know but a friend of mine was facing very serious charges and hired the best attorney in town. The only problem is that the attorney had just got reinstated from a 2 year suspension for getting into a fist fight in the courtroom and this was was being seen by the SAME judge! My friend was acquitted on all charges. Only problem is it took him years to pay off the fees.

@Mewse1203

2 жыл бұрын

@@wingracer1614 kinda feel like that judge should have been recused...

@wingracer1614

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mewse1203 The lawyer said he was a good judge and thought they would get a better outcome in front of him than anyone else. I just found it weird and worried about my friend who I knew was innocent but couldn't prove so had nothing to testify about. It was quite the famous case in town, I would mention it so people could look it up but don't want to drag my friend's name through the mud anymore than it already has been. It's a shame because some of the stories that were printed are hilarious.

@mostlyguesses8385

2 жыл бұрын

Texas judge was in family court, rarely juries in family cases, , , , and family cases often are black and white and mom gets custody and child support set by formula so really a bad family judge in most cases don't matter, , , US local judges aren't that powerful it is rest of world where judges control soooooo much so US aint bad in comparison and 1 bad apple out of 100000 is minor, ,. People should try to pick spouse well and not do crime exactly because relying on stranger for fairness is a crap shoot....

@shawnwatson1419

2 жыл бұрын

Motion for continuance would probably be your best bet as you aren't actually being represented. Your lawyer probably wouldn't be able to access critical notes nor since he's chained up can he represent you properly.

She wasn't aware of what was going on in front of her at the bench, but definitely knew everything going on out in the hall...

The bailiff needs to be held accountable as well for following a unlawful order.

@markschneider8815

Ай бұрын

Unlike the military, I doubt the right to refuse an unlawful order is afforded to court bailiffs. In the strictest sense bailiffs are not law enforcement officers, they are there to enforce the judges' instructions.

@Dieselpwr

Ай бұрын

@@markschneider8815 Must be they don’t take a oath to uphold the constitution inalienable rights meaning they cannot be taken away by a judge

Pretty simple: Those who are offered enhanced protections and immunities due to their government position need to be held to a higher standard. A public reprimand for keeping a lawyer shackled to a jury box while his peers perform business is not sufficient. Also an attorney who has a son who is an attorney is likely older, and was denied representation (his son) while chained to the jury box. These lawyers have very little recourse for being humiliated by this judge and the judicial system has to step up and remove her.

@oldlyswansea

2 жыл бұрын

nope the judge should disbarred and banned from ever holding a government post for life

@Bogster13

2 жыл бұрын

I dunno, the attorney also seems to have felt like not apologizing was more important than his clients case. I can almost get behind the - ok you wont apologize, go sit in time out in the corner where you belong.

@sodoodle296

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bogster13 for sure. If the attorney is a 9 year old. And the judge is her mommy. And by 'courtroom' we mean kitchen. And by 'jury box' we mean kids bedroom.

@sciencerscientifico310

2 жыл бұрын

Or better yet, lose those immunities!

@DiverCTH

2 жыл бұрын

"Under Color of Law" needs to be an enhancing offense on par with to "During the Commission of a Felony" and "With a Deadly Weapon"

This should result in removal from the bench. Sometimes things are so beyond the pale, the normal warnings and reprimand system should skip strikes 1 and 2 and go right to strike 3. The judge knew this was wrong. These people should not be on the bench period.

@dash4800

2 жыл бұрын

I say judges who violate their oaths should be imprisoned. They are messing with peoples freedoms. They need to be held to the highest possible standard and the punishment for corruption, abuse of power, or anything like that should be more serious than just losing your job.

Both attorneys should send her an invoice for the hours they were stuck unable to do their jobs.

I watched a video of a 1st amendment auditor filming in the lobby and hallways of the courthouse. The judge said that was legal but not in the courtroom. the auditor said he wouldn't go in the courtroom. So the judge had the bailiff drag him into the courtroom and judge had him arrested. Court was not in session either.

@LightStorm.

2 жыл бұрын

Link to the video?

It seems to me that this is false imprisonment. Since the attorneys were "moved" in both cases, it might even be kidnapping, depending on the wording in the Texas statute. Are judges immune from prosecution or lawsuit?

@jupitercyclops6521

2 жыл бұрын

That's what I say! You know if a citizen did it. They would be charged

@nunya3163

2 жыл бұрын

In a word, yes. Just like police are immune when they do it.

@michaelwaninger3155

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly, 25 to life for cops and judges and prosecutors who commit these crimes.

@shawnwatson1419

2 жыл бұрын

Judicial immunity is much higher than qualified immunity for cops. Prosecution wise unless it's up there with the "Cash for Kids" or punching a lawyer they can get away with a lot. A lawsuit hardly ever works against a judge. Normally it's 99 to 1 that you can sue a judge and you will lose. Unless it's something so outstanding no their judicial immunity will protect them. Yes it's completely ass backwards as they're supposed to have higher standards however for far too long that same immunity gives them a get out of jail free card in most cases.

@shawnwatson1419

2 жыл бұрын

Also as far as kidnapping. No, they sadly have full jurisdiction in their courtroom. The lobby and so forth become quite sketchy. It depends if court is even in session, and a multitude of other factors (contempt of court can go back to rules set in 1831). In Texas, which i've studied Texas Law for over 20 years, i can tell you a repremand is about all a judge will get. The Texas Bar has so much swing down here. Even though the 5th Circuit did knock them down a notch July 2nd, 2021 on their non-germaine activities.

Y'know...I'm just not surprised that a Family Court judge decided to break the rules, for some reason.

@hughgordon6435

2 жыл бұрын

See all that Susan bassi is doing with family courts and private judges, shocking

The American judicial system never ceases to amaze me.

I never seen anything like that happen in New Jersey, but I was a flooring contractor, I worked for a couple accounts that had contracts with the State, and we did a lot of work in courthouses, polices stations, Sheriff's offices, a few jails, etc. The amount of power Judges and Sheriff's have in that State is insane. We were walking in a courthouse, a Baliff or someone comes over talks to me, aks if I can do a job, but I need to be very discrete, long story short I was pretty much doing a favor for a judge that was cheating on his wife, they pay me pretty good. Never say nothing, Baliff guy gives me a card, you ever get in any trouble in NJ, call me, I will call the Judge, it will be taken care of it. If I was a little younger, I probably would have thought that was the greatest thing ever. I wasn't prone to getting into much trouble, I kept the phone number for a while, I had no doubt the offer was legit, I seen so many shady things in NJ, this wouldn't be top 20. But in the scheme of things not worth getting involved with those things if you don't know the long term outcome. I could see a NJ judge doing what that one did, and nobody even questioning it. It is one of those things, wouldn't a cop complain, wouldn't someone object? Very rarely, because eventually everyone will need a favor. That is why the cops give out the cards, the prosecutors, the judges via proxy. That whole network runs on trust, a cop arrests you for a DWI when you tell him to call so and so, and he didn't call, you will get the DWI, but that cop will suddenly find himself without friends, getting crap duty, laid off, etc.

I wonder if this judge will also claim sleep apnea as a reason for this behaviour XD

@jupitercyclops6521

2 жыл бұрын

Wouldn't be a civilian defense

@michigangeezer3950

2 жыл бұрын

Her menopause has sleep apnea. Clearly she needs forgiven. 🤣

The irony of saying that judges are held to higher standards in this video.

In the first scenario, the judge also violated the client’s right to representation by continuing the proceeding with the attorney shackled and unable to participate.

So many times I've been forced to apologize when I was a kid, and I absolutely hated it because I can say with all certainty that I was never the instigator in any kind of fight or disagreement. I've never forced my child to apologize either, but I have recommended it under certain circumstances, with a full explanation for why.

@samhouston1288

2 жыл бұрын

A forced apology is almost always a fake apology. There's no point in it.

@need100k

2 жыл бұрын

@@samhouston1288 - Agreed

@bwofficial1776

2 жыл бұрын

Do a Hillary Clinton apology: "I'm sorry you were offended," not "I'm sorry I offended you."

@Foolish188

2 жыл бұрын

@@bwofficial1776 Or a Trump apology, doubling down on his lie.

@katrinascarlet5637

2 жыл бұрын

I hated "You don't sound like you mean it."

"honorable"

@Steve there are those that have become too drunk with power. I have no problem with the judge being brought before the judicial review board in the same manner in which she treated those before her bench. This stuff has been going on for years. How many people have been treated this way before someone grows a spine and says I won't tolerate police, judges, and DA's like Binger acting completely out of control. Get em Lawdog. 🤘😎✌️

Sounds like the Family Court judge that I had SCREAM at me in court for asking my attorney a question while I was on the stand. She threw me in jail for 30 days and made me pay opposing counsels attorney fees.

Regardless of the judge's authority extending to the hallway outside the courtroom, continuing to hear arguments in a case in which she has put one party's attorney in time-out **has** to reflect on her impartiality in the case. It's gone! She has become overtly partisan in the case, and therefore **must** recuse herself, and I'm shocked that the attorney sitting in handcuffs with nothing more to lose didn't think to make that motion.

Woman who makes a living out of holding people accountable for their actions is (amazingly) held accountable for her own actions.

@KGditto

2 жыл бұрын

Psh barely. She threw people in jail for months, years. How many times is the judge going to be strip searched huh?

@atthebrink74

2 жыл бұрын

@@KGditto Ditto, Ditto!

@MadMage86

2 жыл бұрын

I dunno, calling this 'holding her accountable' is a stretch.

@FarangKyAy

2 жыл бұрын

"accountability", in the form of a "public reprimand" for illegally detaining a lawyer for hours...well that will teach her! Lol. What's the rate for unlawful detainment by a LEO? Saw people get 50k for a 30/40 minutes illegal detainment...and they weren't lawyers.

I can understand the judge asking if there was anything she needed to know about the exchange out in the hallway from both parties and giving advice about professionalism to the lawyer. Beyond that she should have done nothing.

@michaelwaninger3155

2 жыл бұрын

Or pull the lawyer aside and tell them it is unprofessional for a lawyer to be heard swearing in the hallways of the courthouse.

@furturisticfrontierfilms

2 жыл бұрын

Please, one cannot show how powerful they view themselves by doing nothing. She has a duty and obligation to prove to the court that she is one "Tough Titty" some buck, besides its Texas. That lawyer is is lucky she didn't jump down off the bench take off her robe a place a size 8 Nocona Rattlesnake skin boot square up his hinnie. Ever watch the movie Judge Roy Bean?

@mattc2582

2 жыл бұрын

If it's not part of the official legal proceedings then it's none of her business. Otherwise it's heresy or inadmissible bc it's not under oath. It's all works soup if they encourage this B's from judges

A judge typically presides over a court, not a circus. Imagine how confused the jurors were... like, wait who's on trial now? Does this count as sitting on two trials for my service?

The attorneys need to sue the judge, county and state for false arrest. This why there needs to be a separate justice system that prosecutes judges, DA’s and the police.

I'm beginning to think we ought to get rid of judges as a position. Many of them think of courts as their little fiefdoms.

That judge needs to be disbarred permanently, and all cases involving those attorneys before her should get a mistrial.

@ocoolwow

2 жыл бұрын

What a dumb take

@dangeary2134

2 жыл бұрын

@@ocoolwow personally, I agree with him.

@mrtechie6810

2 жыл бұрын

I agree

@kevinttshortstories1265

2 жыл бұрын

The woman who had her attorney put in the jury box should file a lawsuit for desperation of rights (denied access to her attorney) then maybe to oversight committee will take the right action

@roflchopter11

2 жыл бұрын

@@ocoolwow how so?

She and her bailiff should be arrested and charged for false imprisonment

@HopefulPessimist

Ай бұрын

They're beyond the bar there's nothing you can do it is martial law beyond the bar

If the judicial committee won't hold judges to a standard that the people feel is appropriate, we need to start pressuring the legislature to consider impeachment proceedings.

Court Room Court House How expansive is the authority Court parking lot?

Remove her from the bench. Period. Ordering the one attorney to apologize for something not having occurred within her court. If he and everyone else was put under oath at the beginning of the hearing, then 'apologized' to whoever when he wasnt sorry, wouldn't that be purjury?perjury? The attorneys need to file suit against the appropriate jurisdiction since the judges can't be sued directly as I understand.

When I told my Dad I have Business Law class, he replied “Is that like Cole Slaw?”

Wow! Just freaking WOW! Well my confidence in the judicial system is as high as the moon right now.

In the halls of justice, the only justice is in the hall.

That bit about the theoretical limitations of an individual judge’s jurisdiction within the building but outside of the courtroom was quite useful thanks for highlighting that. I’ve seen several interesting first amendment auditor challenges in court buildings with varying responses by the party’s.

IN my opinion, this judge should be REMOVED from the BENCH with prejudice and REMOVED from the BAR. If it unacceptable for a lawyer to behave this way then it is unacceptable for a judge to behave this way. Judges MUST earn respect same as lawyers.

@lrmackmcbride7498

2 жыл бұрын

Judges in texas are elected. They do not have to be lawyers.

When I lived in Harris County, Texas (Houston), I was called for jury duty in a misdemeanor case involving a female judge and a female neighbor in the street where they lived. Both women had sons who were involved in a water blaster war and were having a high ol' time. The judge didn't like the "war" between the kids and intervened. This got the other mother involved and while the kids were watching, the judge pulled a small automatic pistol from her purse -- probably a .380 -- and displayed it in the palm of her hand while arguing with the neighbor. This was a misdemeanor assault because of the way the pistol was displayed. The ADA who was prosecuting the case explained that had the judge actually pointed the pistol at the neighbor, that would have escalated the offense to a felony assault. I wasn't picked for the jury but since I was already downtown and excused from work, I stayed and watched the trial. I was flabbergasted when the jury found the judge not guilty of assault. Ultimately, it made little difference as she was defeated in the next election. I've often wondered if I would get the same consideration if I displayed a pistol to a person with whom I was having a heated argument. Would I have been charged with a misdemeanor or would they have hit me with a felony? Would a jury acquit me of assault even though I admitted to displaying the pistol? Somehow, I think I'd have been spending quality time in the Huntsville Hilton instead of having dinner with my family after spending the day at work.

Hmm well, thank you for covering the duties and responsibilities of a judge. It’s not always clear to non legal people what’s expected of a judge and what they can and can’t get away with.

Forcing an apology from children is effective because it models expected behavior. Modeling is one of the many parenting skills often overlooked. For adults forcing an apology as stated is really not an apology but a power display.

@Aniaas1

2 жыл бұрын

I'm going to be honest with you - I was that kid 20-odd years ago that figured that forced apologies meant nothing, but that adults would be satisfied with them. Modelling can go wrong if the kid catches the model but not the message.

@granitfog

2 жыл бұрын

@@Aniaas1 Parenting, like any skill or process, is a combination of elements. No one action represents or accomplishes the total.

@solezest7134

2 жыл бұрын

Unless the "children" are very young and as a result don't understand what apologies are or how they work, in which case it could be a learning experience if you make them go through the motions and explain the reasoning, "forcing" an apology is never anything more than a display of power.

@granitfog

2 жыл бұрын

@@solezest7134 There are several ways children learn, one is conditioning, which is the linkage of one action that is neutral or viewed as negative to another action that is viewed as positive, i.e. positive reinforcement. Thus if the "forced" apology is reinforced positively, it will be more effective. Parenting strategies are not single isolated events.

@Foolish188

2 жыл бұрын

Four times I was forced to apologize to my Bully by my parents when I had decided to defend myself. When he was in his twenties, he killed someone and got life. I showed the article to my parents and told them that if they hadn't gotten it so wrong his victim would still be alive. They still believed that I was wrong for fighting back after being violently attacked. When my niece was attacked by a bully, my parents got all upset. My Brother and Sister in law took my advice and called the police. Turns out the bully was being sexually abused by her father. I don't know what my bully's parents did to him, but I suspect it was pretty bad. But my parents got what they wanted, quiet. Forced apologies are fine, when the parents actually LISTEN to what happened, and make the GUILTY one apologize. Making both apologize is unfair and damages BOTH kids, unless the adults cannot determine what happened.

I would never feel comfortable being in that courtroom with that judge even as an observer. Reminds me of that judge that ordered a drug test of an observer.

"Maybe there are worse judges down there in Texas..." Nailed it, Steve. And I'm speaking as a Texan. Btw when you mentioned this was in Harris County I was totally not surprised.

"not aware" the person was handcuffed??? I have no doubt when she ordered the attorney to be detained it was the center of attention for the entire court. how can she NOT notice the man was being handcuffed or was currently handcuffed??

Glad you posted this. I live in a suburb of Houston and never heard about this. I have a relative and also a friend that are attorneys. I will ask them about this. Thank you Steve!!!

THIS is why we need to RECORD Judges in courtrooms!!!!!

Maybe the judge needs to be clamped into stocks in the town square for a morning, just to see what it’s like. Offending staff can be held at attention during the sentence.

forcing children to apologize teaches them several things: -adults will force you to lie. -its useful to lie to avoid further problems. -adults think they can compel you to say things against your will. -adults dont care how you feel or what you think, they demand obedience.

Yet another point that illustrates that hitmen are cheaper and more effective than lawyers.

A friend was a court clerk and told me she was constantly having to tell the judge that he couldn’t do things he wanted to do…

We all start to laugh when a story begins with " a Florida man ", well Texas people are fighting to get the same reaction if the story begins with : " a Texas man"

@darkmantlestudios

2 жыл бұрын

Nah, it's more like "a Texas official"

You've posted several stories like this. It all starts with judges having too much power. Why can't that lawyer sue the judge personally for violating his rights? Oh, that's right. No judge can be held civilly or criminally libel for ANYTHING they say or do in their official capacity as a judge. They can be removed, but that's it. Can you image if doctors were immune and could only have their license revoked - by other doctors, of course. Why are prosecutors and judges given such power?

@wingracer1614

2 жыл бұрын

He could sue the state for violating his rights

@swdierks

2 жыл бұрын

@@wingracer1614 You can't sue 'the state'. You have to sue a specific part or department. So who would he sue? The court? The judge IS the court, as they love to point out. I've never heard of someone successfully suing 'the state' for actions of a judge. But I could be wrong.

@wingracer1614

2 жыл бұрын

A couple more points. 1. Judicial immunity is a good thing. Can you imagine what a mess it would be to try and sue or prosecute a large corporation or wealthy individual if the judge knew he was going to get sued if he ruled against that company or individual? The Roman Republic had these sorts of nightmares and it took at least three civil wars and tyranny to end it. 2. You can sue a judge if the actions you are suing over were outside that judges jurisdiction. And I don't mean outside his or her location (though that would probably count too) but outside of the scope a judge can reasonably be assumed to have authority over. Arresting someone for contempt of court is something a judge can do so you can't sue for that even if it is an egregiously bad decision but shackling someone to a bench, in public for half a day? I think a good case could be made for that though of course, it will be difficult to get a judge to rule against judicial immunity.

@swdierks

2 жыл бұрын

@@wingracer1614 I disagree with #1. Having a elite that is, by a matter of law, not accountable is bad. There has to be a better way to shield them. Doctors seem to handle this issue just fine, and we still have medical care. I agree with #2, I thought I said that. If a judge takes bribes or shoots someone, then they are not immune, just for ANYTHING and EVERYTHING the do in their official capacity. This breeds arrogance and a sense that they are better than us. They can be insulting and verbally abusive to anyone, but you look at a judge the wrong way and watch out. It's a testament to vast majority of good people who become judges that it happens as infrequently as it does.

@WorBlux

2 жыл бұрын

@@wingracer1614 1. For misconduct, no. Particularly for contempt of court where the judge is also the prosecutor/plantiff rather than trying to solve disputes between parties and bad decisions may be appealed.

That judge should be sentenced to a compulsory bukkake recipient 😂

Those lawyers should sue the judge for deprivation of civil rights and official misconduct.

Ben is on top of MIC#7

@terrancecoard388

2 жыл бұрын

I convinced myself he was on the wall behind mic #4. good call because I know to look there and missed it.

Question: when appearing at a hearing for asset discovery ( to collect on a judgement) . What’s to stop the debtor from lying about their assets? Are there other method of discovery we can use to confirm honesty?

@Veritas-invenitur

2 жыл бұрын

It’s purgery. If you can prove that someone committed purgery and the purgery was egregious then find a way to bring it to the judges attention. Depending on the severity, the person may be held in contempt or even charged. Unfortunately, it’s common for purgery to occur and go unpunished. However, if its provable and severe, you have options such as to consult with your attorney. This is not legal advice and is not intended to be taken as legal advice. This is my opinion based on my perception and my research. Nothing said should be or is intended to be taken as factual or accurate.

They should have handcuffed the judge to the jury box for not answering the question.

@allanpatterson7653

4 ай бұрын

Cool and Unusable punishment not allowed.

@butteryfriedwizard2219

4 ай бұрын

@allanpatterson7653 well, at least we agree it would be cool.

You said it. Judges from Texas.

Ben hanging out on top of the mic

Ben - balancing nicely on top of the 7th mic.

I love this channel! Steve you are awesome!

That judge needs to be disbarred!! Totally disgusting!!!

Has anyone else noted that in almost every case of a judge misbehaving in this manner.....it turns out to be a woman judge?

@noneed8882

2 жыл бұрын

Was thinking ……….. 😮 😅

Hundo, unfolded, across the top of the fourth mic from the right on the top of the main cabinet. 89.

So, we have unhinged and hormonal judges sentencing us? What a sham. Send the judges to jail! She doesn't belong on the bench!

People get so bent out of shape over cursing. It's just a word, I don't see why people have such a problem with it.

She demands he tell her what he said, demands he say his sorry and then puts him in time out when he doesn’t. She must have been coming off a power trip ordering her kids around at home.

The judge lost in the Democratic primary on March 1st for her reelection. Is it harder to suspend a judge that is elected? Would a male judge have gotten off that lightly? If a male judge had shackled attorneys who were women? Apparently she has been known for other unusual things such as giving a lifetime protective order against a mother to protect the unborn fetus.

I think she should be removed from the bench. She is a disgrace to the judicial system!

I really miss that ex cop in WA state who used to go around citizen-arresting corrupt judges from their bench. We need someone like that again to put some healthy respect for the law back into our adjudicators.

He only thought he was a lawyer he was actually a hockey player got put in the penalty box 😂😂😂

Judges get full of themselves. They think they're royalty and can do anything they want. She should have been taken off the bench. Her ego is too big for the position.

Only two words needed, with some dots: Absolute power....

Judge: i am admonishing you over your professional conduct. Also judge: Please excuse my unprofessional conduct.

Reminds me of how Caesar had Cato arrested for filibustering his bill after he slow-walked the bill through debate, holding the senate's hand the whole time.