Bo Melton torched in week 17 for over 100 yards and two TD’s. He’s Green Bay’s 5th receiver. We might not have a number 1, but if you have 5 number 2’s. You’re good

@Bigsosa214

16 күн бұрын

I’m people forget about Malik heath to.. dudes a dawg run blocking and made some really clutch catches

@myfriendstutta

16 күн бұрын

@@Bigsosa214that goal line catch against Vegas, I believe, comes to mind. Beautiful ball from love and even better catch from heath

@Bigsosa214

16 күн бұрын

@@myfriendstutta it was the giants but yeah he’s very underrated in my opinion his run blocking put him over melton in my opinion unless Watson is out then melton will need to fill the deep threat roll

@freddieroper6458

16 күн бұрын

Touri and Dubose watch them In preseason Dubose been hurt he's a monster

@MrHovaboy31

16 күн бұрын

If waston can get right he can be that dude

Give me the 5 WRs that would start on any other team, 2 good TEs, a star rb, a solid 5+1, Jordan Love, and MLF pulling the strings.

@russg9371

15 күн бұрын

I'm just happy to see MLF prove that he doesn't need Rodgers to have a decent team. I'm hoping that the defense is better than it has been, if they turn things around the Packers could easily be in the Superbowl this next season

@TheHumbleking718

15 күн бұрын

I thought that said MILF I’m like WTF 😂😂😂

Good teams are quickly learning how much more valuable it is to weaponize receiver depth rather than pay a top guy.

@thomaswelcomer8443

16 күн бұрын

Overpaying ANYONE just makes it harder to fill out a competitive roster, no doubt...

@ImGoingSupersonic

16 күн бұрын

Exactly, when teams cant even afford 3 stars, QB, receiver and lets say a defensive lineman, that's ridiculous. The shuffling if players to other teams is a weird way to go about it.

@jarrettjernigan9077

15 күн бұрын

This narrative gotta stop, it’s only one team that can go out and do that type of roster building without Payin top skill players and that’s Mahomes . No other qb is good enough to do that

@r.williamcomm7693

13 күн бұрын

Agree 100%. At the money some of these WR1s expect there are huge diminishing returns. Better off to have a low paid track star who draws double coverage for fear of killing them deep than paying over $30M to a true WR1.

You can roll coverage to cover a number one WR. You can scheme for one guy. But you do not have enough good corners to cover four exceptional WR’s. You throw in two pass catching TE’s, and you’ve got a back seven constantly under stress and a DC that’s gonna be up all night trying to figure out what to do.

@dereklarson5322

16 күн бұрын

And then you run Jacobs when they start to finally get some coverage.

@florida1289

16 күн бұрын

That rolled coverage that a number 1 wr mandates makes defenses predictable allowing an OC to build his entire offense off that. Calvin Johnson type will always take the safety with him +the guy who's covering him + a lb underneath if it's zone. If you don't have that guy you aren't forcing the defense to do anything therefore they're doing what they want. GB probably has that guy they're just in the process of developing him.

@RyGuy1127

14 күн бұрын

​@dereklarson5322 honestly think Lloyd will round out this running game too if he turns out as expected. Jacobs & him could be a dangerous 1 2 punch

I think that having multiple options is better than just having an WR1. Football is evolving, the media needs to evolve with it.

@xXMc1ovinXx

15 күн бұрын

Like hell even 49ers D struggled against packers in the playoffs and thats with the pack being as new and as young as they were, the young guns didn't have th3 experience to put the game away, but we should see this year a great difference

@shotyme579

10 күн бұрын

Yeah I agree, this one tract mind mentality is hilarious 😂

@xXMc1ovinXx

10 күн бұрын

@shotyme579 Like we can look at all the teams with a true dominant no1 wr, raiders suck with davante, jefferson is stuck on vikings who havent been relevant in a long time, Tyreek only is relevant in the reg season as we know dolphins now hold the longest drought without a playoff win of 23 years and Vs KC he got shut down lol, hell when GB doubled jefferson he had the worst game of his career, Lamb sucked nuts in the playoffs lol, diggs now just hopped teams cause hes dramatic, like the list goes on and on of teams with basically a true no1 but no actually caste around them, look at mahomes, brady, even 49ers who have such a solid wr core all around and they preform so much better, i hate this mentality of oh we need a no1 who will get open, well its shown in big games they usually get shut down and the other wrs dont produce enough to get the team over the hump

Great answer and attitude from Jordan, he’s trained well for the media.

@hockeyfan1799

16 күн бұрын

I mean it's the truth lmao

@dancooke7204

16 күн бұрын

I've noticed he is way better at q and a than last year. He looks like he was coached he's so much better. Dude is a talented, smart grinder.

@maxjaeger40

16 күн бұрын

He never was trained, he is just a good guy. Packers don't go after anything else.

@joeycoppersmith8606

3 күн бұрын

He learned what not to do from Aaron Rodgers

We have a number 1 wr. His name is Christian watson. He strikes fear into defenses when he's on the field. He went to Madison to fix his hamstring issues. Go pack go baby😊

@brokentubing

16 күн бұрын

Go Lions

@Husha2263

13 күн бұрын

🤫 Most ppl don't know about him using his hammy more than the other...I want his ADP to stay low so I can get him at great value 🤐

@TLouski

12 күн бұрын

Yeah 6'5, 220+ and runs a 4.3 with great hands??.. Dude has stupid potential.

No tunnel vision, no double coverage on a receiver. Defenses usually look at Watson to be number one since he beats cornerbacks and safeties usually have to chime in. That will leave another receiver open for love

Nah it’s actually okay to have what we have. We don’t have to worry about the QB zeroing on one guy as a crutch. Love love love rodgers, but he did that later in his career with Davante. Having a multitude of people to spread it around and especially in our offense, works just fine for us and will continue to this year

@JamesB-mi9uu

16 күн бұрын

I think that it can be done but it’s really hard to score in the red zone without that guy that draws attention, just look at Aaron Jones Td numbers going down as Rodgers left

@landonic81

16 күн бұрын

Yup Rodgers would throw a ball to Adams in double coverage and completely ignore the guy thats wide open.

@DualityUnlimited

16 күн бұрын

Because Davantae would still performed even when doubled while the other dude may drop the ball like they did during practice all week. He wasn’t just zeroing in on Davantae for no reason.

@Whiskey61

16 күн бұрын

@@DualityUnlimited Malik Heath scored a touchdown one play after a bad drop because Jordan had trust in his teammate and went back to him.

@DualityUnlimited

16 күн бұрын

@@Whiskey61 You missed my point. I never said that never happens because it happens often. Also sometimes someone is having an off game so you don’t target them in effort to protect them from media fans and the Organization when you know they are off. Like in anything performance based you go with that hot hand. It usually makes sense to give the ball to an elite WR even if they are doubled teamed when you know they can make the play regardless if another offense weapon is open. It all depends on the situation, skillset and trust. My initial Point Remains.

As a Lions fan I am really excited for Week 9 at Lambeau. Should be a fun game to watch

@JohnStockton7459

16 күн бұрын

Excited for a loss? Weird

@baseballsoffury642

16 күн бұрын

@@JohnStockton7459 hey the Lions have played very well at Lambeau lately. Don’t be surprised if they do again and win

@Bigsosa214

16 күн бұрын

@@baseballsoffury642 agreed I love the competition.. packers vs lions is what packers vs bears was suppose to be

@andyd5038

16 күн бұрын

Youre excited...but ya aint winning

@baseballsoffury642

16 күн бұрын

@@andyd5038 Alright but don’t come crying if we win AGAIN

As a packer fan I’d much rather have 5 high end number 2 wrs who combinded are getting paid less than 7 mil this year than a single wr taking 33+ mil defense can’t stop you if you have a unlimited amount of weapons

@jdb2722

16 күн бұрын

I agree only issue is the past two seasons we’ve had too much dead cap to take advantage. Next year will be the only true benefit

@KevinWildes2024

16 күн бұрын

5 high end number 2 😂😂😂😂

@greenbaybucks

16 күн бұрын

​@KevinWildes2024 tf you laughing at goofy

@KevinWildes2024

16 күн бұрын

@@greenbaybucks keep crying 😆 🤣 😂

@andyd5038

16 күн бұрын

​​@KevinWildes2024 bless your idiotic heart

Packers are stacked at receiver and tight end. Who cares if some random fans not in Wisconsin don’t know their names? We 5 guys that could all become number 1’s

@brokentubing

16 күн бұрын

Go Lions

@jdb2722

16 күн бұрын

@@brokentubing lions had their fun season. They get one every 20 years

@milwaukeejack4290

12 күн бұрын

Preach

Its simple i see a thumbnail about Jordan Love and the Packers i click it.

Packers have a number 1 WR . And that’s C.Watson . Yes , he’s dealt with injuries , but fact of the matter is he’s someone who has to be accounted for while fully healthy . He led ALL rookie WRs in TDs .. he was tied for first in contested catches (75% catch rate on contested catches) he has elite height and speed and can take the top off of any defense . He’s a WR1 no doubt . Packers just have a different approach . Packers approach is , the same as them not passing out captain patches . Everyone is being held to a high standard and I love this new philosophy because the packers are stacked to the point that they can only pass out so many captain patches lol . Long story short , ANYONE on this team is able to be a leader ! One band , one sound ! That’s what creates a winning team . Not favoritism , but togetherness ! Packers have the tightest group of players in the league guaranteed and that will ultimately be the reason for our success !

@44waxwings

16 күн бұрын

No need to write my own comment cuz you summed it up perfectly. Go Pack Go!

@thisistheBIGCHEESE

16 күн бұрын

W in the chat, go pack go🧀

WTF do you expect him to say? Oh, you are right. We are screwed and our team is going to totally suck. --- Nobody is ever going to say that.

Jayden Reed will be a #1 but all 3 of they wideouts are good

@williamhermann6635

16 күн бұрын

What do you mean 3? They have 5 good receivers.

@rp12053

16 күн бұрын

Im talkin starters

@Pryeclipse

16 күн бұрын

Watson is the number 1 when healthy tall fast strong and can run routes

Did Florio forget the Packers WR room in 2010 when they won it all? Jordy Nelson/Donald Driver/Greg Jennings/James Jones. It can work for some teams not having a #1 game if they have a solid core.

@klohr311

16 күн бұрын

It worked for what a yr or two and everything fell apart. Lol. It was not sustainable. Yet the giants beat the packers in the playoffs. There’s only one ball.

@Whiskey61

16 күн бұрын

@@klohr311 The defense gave up 37 against the Giants in the playoffs. Having another WR gonna change that?

@klohr311

16 күн бұрын

@@Whiskey61 def giving up 37 pts is not the conversation..having bunch no2 wr didn’t help the packers. Name a packers wr that is going to the hof during the farve and Rodgers era??

@Whiskey61

16 күн бұрын

@@klohr311 What does that have to do with anything?

@klohr311

16 күн бұрын

@@Whiskey61 ????

I thought the game was suppose to be trying not to expose your hand to the opponents...

@SunniMerlot

16 күн бұрын

That’s not exposing

@maxjaeger40

16 күн бұрын

We're not exposing ourselves, we are confusing other teams.

Packers have the best WR core in the league. Watson has Mike Evans type potential and Romeo Dobbs is an absolute freak so I think Pacs has a few #1 options.

That’s why the Vikings aren’t winning anything having number 1 you have to pay bunch money for.

@jarrettjernigan9077

16 күн бұрын

Not true , we had the money to pay him. Getting Kirk off the books and gettin Jett’s done gives us an opportunity to pay darisaw early and also add free agents next year we have jj McCarthy on rookie contract for next 4 and we will have 5th most cap space

@HoopsMegaCentral

16 күн бұрын

@@jarrettjernigan9077Having the 5th most cap soave in division that’s going to be hell 😂.

@jarrettjernigan9077

15 күн бұрын

@@HoopsMegaCentral yea that’s all good somebody gotta lose and someone gotta win, I do not think we will be the worst team in the division though , I def will tell you that !

I wish Dubose could take off. Great story and the kid has good hands

Christian Watson is the receiver that keeps the coordinator up at night - that squad keeps the entire defense up

The majority watching this are Packer fans and I think the majority of us would prefer what we have now over our offense a few years ago with 17 being arguably the best receiver in the league. We have had both but we love where we are, no divas, no selfishness, just football. It’s going to be so beautiful.

It’s a good pr answer but of course he wants a number 1 receiver to open up the offense and make defenses easier to read

What was the score to the Dallas game?

REMEMBER WHEN JERRY JONES SAID WE DON'T NEED A NUMBER ONE RECEIVER ??? MIDSEASON HE TRADED A NUMBER ONE PICK FOR AMARI

@williamhermann6635

16 күн бұрын

And won nothing so whats your point?

@joer1678

16 күн бұрын

Using Jerry Jones as a counter argument lol

The great thing is Love doesn't care who gets open. I will say this, Watson changes the way defenses play them. He attracts safety attention every play. When he's on the field, the offense is just different. He opens up the field like no other. He can catch one or two a game and totally change how other teams cover, he is a problem. They play ok without him because they've had to, but when he's out there it's just different. He's the #1 but in a different sense, not numbers but the attention he attracts and demands. He makes a defense account for his speed and ability. This offense has a chance to be special, all those guys have #1 skills and they are just getting started, it will sort itself out as far as who gets more touches or less, but they all can step up if needed. I see probably one getting 1,000 yards and the rest between 500 and 800, the TEs will also steal a lot of touches. Love will get 4,000 easily and who cares how he does it. He should also get 30 to 40 TDs easily, even if Jacobs and Lloyd get 15 rushing TDs combined.

The conversation is irrelevant because one or two of these Packer receivers is going to jump up into that role this season. If Watson is healthy he will easily be a #1 and Reed also has the talent to be a #1. I don't think Doubs is going to be a huge stats WR, but he makes catches in big moments, like James Jones. Wicks is also really talented, however, I don't think he will get as many reps as the top three.

Green Bay recently had the best receiver in football and a bunch of average. I'll take what Green Bay currently has over that every day. With Davante Adams teams knew who was going to beat them and the good teams were able to stop it enough to win. Now the Packers have 7 guys who can go off on any given day, all with unique skillsets, and defenses aren't sure who it's going to be. I think it's harder to scheme your defense to deal with an entire receiving core of B+ guys than it is to scheme your defense to deal with 1 S guy and a bunch of C+ guys.

I totally agree with J Love, he hit it on the head. We've already had a "Play Catch duo with Rodgers and Adams....no championships. Bring on the receiver Pack.

WR position is so deep in the draft year after year that you can consistently find good guys deeper in the draft if the team knows how to coach and knows what they want in a player. The Packers do it year after year

I recall when Davante Adams was injured & Rogers had to spread the ball around and had great success. I think with the right HC/OC and a great quarterback & receiving corps, victory happens. Not that anyone would refuse having a healthy Adams back in the lineup!

Jayden Reed will be the Packers WR1 by the end of the year

The Packers are more dangerous not focusing on one receiver…

All Packers fans agree with Love! We don’t want a clear #1 I love that defenses have to covers 3-4 WRs at all times instead of just 1

Star WRs usually don't win multiple Super Bowls. Many don't win one. Star TEs do, but when you take out Jerry Rice, there are few rings throughout the Top 10 Career Receiving Yards list. And this is mainly a statement on correlation, not causation.

I think Nico Collins is worth every penny! Talk about "big window" receivers....Collins is a MAMMOTH window receiver...from the ground all the way up to his 6'4" + 37.5 inch vertical. He is not as stocky as Andre, but he is faster, more elusive and will still hammer defenders for yards after contact. Nico Collins is probably the most overlooked, top ten receiver in the NFL today. Numbers do not lie.

Wicks, Reed and a healthy Watson all have #1 talent. These guys could be elite this season.

Did this dude say AB wasn’t as dominant as TO?? Maybe physically not but he had arguably the best 6 year stretch of a WR in history like wtf is Florio on about

If their definition of a number one receiver is a guy who constantly gets double covered, then we have 4 number one receivers on our roster. Last year, there would be weeks where Reed was getting double covered consistently. Other weeks it was Watson getting doubled when he was healthy. Lets also not forget Doubs was the best Packer receiver in the playoffs and he absolutely torched Gilmore and the Dallas defense. And I didn't even mention Melton, Heath, Wicks, or the tight ends. I got a feeling Green Bay will be just fine heading into this year.

Vikings to one guy 35 million next year packer 10 wrs on the rosters 12 million

I think these guys are underestimating just how talented the Packers WRs are. There were games last year where They has 2 of the 5-deep squad injured and then someone else had a #1 WR type game. Doubs had a few games he took over. Wicks had a few games. Hell, even the #5 WR Bo Melton had one of the best single WR games at the end of last year. Aside from 5-deep WRs, the Packers have two young Tight Ends with receiving talent, Luke Musgrave has super-talent and could be a pro-bowler some year soon. I'm just saying, that Packers team is stacked. They don't need a #1. They have near-pro bowl level young guys all over the offense and even off the bench.

When you line up with 4 WR DAWGS at the line of scrimmage, and nobody is clearly above the others, the D don’t know WHAT to do

This is late, but Simms just said the Chiefs don’t have a number one and then brought up Gronk…

Nothing wrong with Green Bay having 3 or 4 "1's" and 4 "2's" to spread the ball around with every week. What team wouldn't want their situation??? DC's have a tough time figuring who the hell is going to break out in any given game. It's a true luxury.

Christian Watson scored 3 TDs in one game. He gets triple covered. He is a number 1.

@michaelparish5302

16 күн бұрын

He should be #1, but he's not consistent enough while other guys have stepped up hard.

@Whiskey61

16 күн бұрын

@@michaelparish5302 If you watch the all 22, he is #1. Defenses focus on him heavily.

Christian Watson is undoubtedly the #1 guy in the red zone. Otherwise it’s a toss up and as a Cheesehead I love it.

There's not a single weak spot in GBs offense, 2024 they're gonna have a top 5 offense

From a fantasy standpoint, too many mouths to feed. From a football standpoint, I love that every one of Green Bay's receivers could be "the guy" in any given game.

Good QB's create GREAT receivers. If Jordan Love is actually a good QB a quality receiver will emerge on the Packers roster.

Hilarious to think not having a number one receiver is a bad thing. They must have missed last season and the unprecedented success.

I agree 100% with Love!.!.! I would rather have an entire receiver group that keeps a coordinator up at night than a single receiver that they can game plan for & try to take him out of action! The biggest strength of our offense is having an entire group that could be WR1 on any other team! I genuinely believe Reed & Wicks & gonna take a massive leap forward next season but i still believe Love will find the best receiver in the best spot at the time instead forcing bad passes to the teams clear WR1 like we've seen time & time again in the NFL... Also the fact that we don't have a WR1 keeps diva drama out of our locker room! I swear thses talking heads just be talking out of their necks sometimes!.!.! G🏈 P🧀ck G🏈

The packers have 5 wrs that can get 100+ yards any given week. Jalen Reed was probably the number 1 at the end of the season but he even had games with no yards

As an added bonus does it potentially save on resigning as these young receivers get new contracts?

Christian Watson will show he’s clearly no. 1 this year anyway But the other guys are not far behind him Wicks and doubs will be phenomenal Jayden reed is an X factor Bo melton is the guy that will shred you if you forget him too

I think Christian Watson should seek a trade to the New England Patriots. He would be an impact WR1 day one there. At least they would appreciate his clear WR1 talent.

I think playing a team that has 5 "WR1s" would keep me up at night. I'd hate to be a DC that has to scheme around the clock coverage of Christian Watson, Romeo Doubs, Jayden Reed, Dontayvian Wicks, Bo Melton, Luke Musgrave and Malik Heath and still contain the run game of Josh Jacobs, AJ Dillon, and Jordan Love...like wtf are you supposed to do other than default to zone or zone-man?

I disagree with Love, i think having 5 dudes who can get the ball, what do you do? Either way, we'll see how it goes. It was amazing to watch last year.

When all we had was Adams, teams that had a good defense to contain the run and double Adams would beat us cus we didn’t have anyone else to rely on. Now we have all these guys that you have to cover and don’t know who we’re going to. I think Watson being healthy impacts the defense the most so you could say he’s our WR1 cus his ceiling is the highest. But he’s not gonna have the most production every game. Doubs, Reed, Wicks, and our TEs are gonna be the guys that are getting the production and Watson is there for the big play.

Reed is the 1

They answered the wrong question, was not at all what Jordan Love was saying. Packers don't have a clear cut number one receiver, that does not mean they aren't exceptionally talented and deep at the position. I would rather have a talented deep receiver room than a clear cut #1 and a handful of below average receivers.

Any WR that leads ur team in yds and TDs is a #1 receiver

I feel like Mac Jones had enough starts and time on the field to develop. He is a solid back up at this point. Same with Zack Wison. He’s had 3 seasons to prove himself. We can’t blame the coach for the interception thrown.

They forget that we got Tight Ends, like Musgrave and Kraft. All threats for defensive players 😂😂 they can't stop us all💚💛

The receiver position is turning into the RB position. You can do it with a committee. We just haven’t realized it yet

Romeo is the #1 WR in GB end of discussion.

Macs lovin' it now, he is in a SO much better place with Doug Peterson, a coach who actually knows the position!

The number one receiver should be the best decision on the field at the time. My only concern would be who can get open. Btw a number guy also creates an issue with the salary cap.

They already tried that with Rodgers and Adams. Didn’t work late in playoffs when 49ers/Bucs double and triple team Adams every year

Watson's speed is fearful to any defense

None of them have had a shot to be number 1 yet. They are in their second year with Jordan love. These are all year 1 & 2 receivers

I’d rather have a balanced offense and depth. Rodgers had a number one and they shut him off in the playoffs.

Statistically Stafford was no better without Calvin. He won the exact same number of playoff games with or without Calvin in Detroit 0.

So you would rather have 1 guy that a strikes fear in a defense than 5-6 guys that can almost do the same??? How can a defense stop an offense that has 6 guys that can make big plays for their team, I’ll answer that, you can’t!

By the end of the season they will find one.

You guys are silly how about the chiefs last year i think its harder to defend easier to to disguise what your doing offensively

Watson can be that guy to be honest as long as he stays healthy we showed we dont need a number 1 we just needed tge younger WR to get better which we all know they did.

call it what you want, it worked last year

Idk In Jordan defense I would say that Dallas cowboys game he did had multiple Wrs stepping up.

I’m glad the Packers couldn’t get a deal done with Davante Adams. They would have been in the NFC championship last year if they had.

Flores and Simms are becoming are plebeians atp. Jordan clearly articulated that any of his guys can be the #1 on a given play and situation which makes them harder to guard. #1 WRs are great but make you more predictable as well.

I don’t get this take. At one time the packers had driver, Jennings, Nelson, jones and Cobb. Adams eventually after driver was gone. There was no clear 1. Jordy eventually became a 1. Adams eventually became a 1. Someone will step up and become that guy but at this point, depth is a great problem to have

Correct me if I’m wrong, but would anyone classify Tom Brady’s SB winning teams having a #1 WR? The one time he had a true #1 in Randy Moss the Patriots never won the SB.

Still with that "Packers need a N° 1 receiver" crap? GB has like seven guys that showed they can catch passes and run routes like the best.

Ask Dallas how much they enjoyed our wide receiver by committee approach…..

Didn't even mention the clear cut favorite.. MUSKGRAVE BAYYYBEEEE. We'll be KC on offense, SF on defense. It's a lock, 110%

Not having a 1wr is great because u can't double team and every player can't guard all of them so someone will be open so I disagree with them totally IMO. GO-PACK-GO

I’m curious when NO had Bree’s and Payton running who was the number one ?

@BTipp24

16 күн бұрын

I believe it was Marques Colston for a long time. He also had Jimmy Graham. Then he had Michael Thomas.

@russellayers3408

16 күн бұрын

@@BTipp24 Also remember that Payton loved having 5 eligibles on every play and using the backs in the short passing game. Reggie Bush, Pierre Thomas and eventually Mark Ingram and Alvin Kamara.

I don't agree with Florio about the receivers (I think Sims is closer to on it), but I think some of it is also a definition problem, where "No WR1" is being treated like it's saying something negative about the quality of the receivers, rather than just describing a structure. Essentially, the Packers are actually following a known formula: all they're doing is trying to have so many pass catchers that other teams will struggle to cover them all (heck, we're basically seeing the Texans do the same thing just this year). But because they don't have someone to hold up as a token WR1(for lack of a better term) like other teams that have used this formula have done -- and because they're choosing to be totally candid about this fact -- everyone's losing their collective minds. By the way, the Packers' own history supports this model. The Packers have played in three Super Bowls and won two in the modern era, and all of those came in years where the receiver group was more of a collective unit and didn't have That One Guy. Except this current Packers receiver corps might have more collective talent than either the 96/97 or 2010 units did, and that should be a terrifying thought.

Yea I like Bo Melton. I wish the Bengals had gotten him. He has 4.38 speed too.

I think it's different when you have 4 number 2s like the Packers. On any given play their top 4 receivers can beat man coverage immediately. At that point I don't think it matters

Reed is a number #1 WR. Most people just don’t know it yet.

I believe they’re going to spend many nights up trying to figure out who is the number one just like you are going to

Any of those WR's can play like a #1. Do you want the same #1 every game or would you rather have a different #1. Where maybe they are the #1 because of the match-up you created.....

If these guys knew how talented the present GB WRs are then they would know that Love is accurate in his assessment; that the Packers are far better off with this group of receivers than having a number #1 like Adams who a defense can double cover and shut down. Rodgers proved this in the playoffs in forcing the ball too often to Adams costing them playoff games.

I think the offensive scheme of the packers will work just fine. PFT is totally wrong.

The media just wants Green Bay to fit the mold and are mad we don’t fit it we broke the mold 😁

The Packers has 4 number 2's and a 1A. We won a Super Bowl with Favre when he couldn't focus on Sharp and with Aaron when he had 5 number 2's. Yawl sound crazy!

Come on. They will double their best option on what ever option that is

Lets not also forget when your quarterback will inly go to the number 1 receiver. I saw rodgers throw to adams numerous times he should not have