Climate change shouldn't be a right or left subject. Just an issue.

@ethantaub8846

4 жыл бұрын

JESSE WILSON yup, I’m right/conservative but believe in climate change, it’s scientifically proven

@thegoat-ishere4414

4 жыл бұрын

JESSE WILSON Too bad Big Oil Business corrupted one side of politics to be ‘skeptics’ of the science of anthropogenic climate change (in reality they are usually just denying).

@actionjackson1173

4 жыл бұрын

Its weird how it became that way.

@EasternManiac

4 жыл бұрын

The far right and far left cannot budge in their beliefs. So annoying. I’m right, but if something is proven or makes sense, I tend to believe it.

@soka227

4 жыл бұрын

Its so fucking weird that its a right and left issue

"Arguing with a smart person is hard. Arguing with a stupid person is impossible"

@TheAmsmith13

3 жыл бұрын

Don’t argue with a stupid person. They’ll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

@arthursullivan681

3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely 💯 💯 💯

@aktharchowdhury9839

3 жыл бұрын

Why do the media give this unqualified dumbass a platform to spout bollocks.

@Connection-Lost

3 жыл бұрын

@Michael Larkin Joe's level of informed is "It seems like we pollute a lot and that's probably bad". Meanwhile, Candace is trying to point out the FACT that every single climate prediction has been wrong, and in some cases the opposite happens.

@sumitrousyk8188

3 жыл бұрын

“Arguing with a genius”

“Why have an opinion on something you have no data about? “ This question should be at the center of any discussion.

@deusmuerte6832

2 ай бұрын

Another good question, a you sure your opinion is made on correct information?

@Yodontdoit

2 ай бұрын

She did fucking say she didn’t know enough nd Joe kept pushing

@OneTheBlue

2 ай бұрын

That's because she continues to express strong opinions on this topic about which she is ignorant. @@Yodontdoit

@OneTheBlue

2 ай бұрын

Yes, it is correct to say that one cannot discuss a topic without relevant data. I don't believe you can find an example of someone expressing a meaningful opinion on a topic about which they possess no information. @@deusmuerte6832

@Yodontdoit

2 ай бұрын

@@OneTheBlue well Joe has since changed his stance on climate change to something similar to hers sooo

I can’t stand when people try to talk over eachother because they disagree

@user-cg5lo4zy6f

Ай бұрын

who cares?

@ViewAppalachia

Ай бұрын

@@user-cg5lo4zy6f apparently you do since you took the time to not only read my comment but also to reply to it 🤡

@AppleOfThineEye

19 күн бұрын

​@@user-cg5lo4zy6fMe. I care.

@Peoplesuck333

Күн бұрын

A lot of people

"Yeah the climate changing, the weather was different yesterday" PACK IT UP BOYS, SCIENCE HAS BEEN DISPROVED

@madhatter4173

4 жыл бұрын

She formed a very strong opinion after one night of 'deep diving' into a couple of articles. I'm not from the US and a touch confused...is she actually considered as bright over there?

@Sev826

4 жыл бұрын

@@madhatter4173 I'm not from the us either, but I think a lot of Americans would not consider her bright. But a lot probably would, which is a tad frightening

@yovonne7

4 жыл бұрын

🤣🙌🏼😂😂

@josuke6869

4 жыл бұрын

Tis fucking hilarious comment man 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@jordanp8063

4 жыл бұрын

Science never proved anything. If you believe science leads to objective truths you're a sheep

She must've graduated from Ben Shapiro's speed talking academy

@DJMarcO138

4 жыл бұрын

Emphasis on the speed. They're legal meth heads. Probably hopped up on adderall or something. They sound like every meth head or coke head who's ever thought that what they have to say means something.

@sirbluntalot324

4 жыл бұрын

@John Burton I kno that you kno that I kno that IF that wasnt sarcasm that was about as racist as you can get while simultaneously being as ignant as you can get...n you kno I kno you kno you ain't no racist...so ima chalk that up as sarcasm.

@DJMarcO138

4 жыл бұрын

@John Burton "credit to her race" sounds pretttty fuckin' racist bro, lol.

@DJMarcO138

4 жыл бұрын

@John Burton there's only one race, you twat...human. And saying "credit to their race", is like saying "they speak well for a _______". It's at best a backhanded compliment, but in reality, just racism.

@DJMarcO138

4 жыл бұрын

@@KnockManJo speaking super fast and saying absolutely nothing of substance isn't verbal dexterity.

I learned all about climate science one night….one night lol 😂

The backpedaling is off the charts. As much as she claims she does not want to die on that hill, she sure is coming off as a victim on it.

@hoon_sol

14 күн бұрын

It's called "backpedaling", as in when you pedal a vehicle backwards instead of forwards.

@PPSainity

14 күн бұрын

@@hoon_sol thanks, you can rest easily now that I fixed that typo on a 2 month old comment.

@hoon_sol

14 күн бұрын

@@PPSainity: There's a big difference between a typo and a misspelling; in the former case you know how to spell it but made some error while writing it (like missing a character or hitting a different character, or maybe an extra space, and so on), whereas in the latter case you think a word is spelled in a different way than it really is. So me correcting you on it should ideally be welcomed by you, since you have now learnt how to spell it correctly. But thanks, I'll sleep quite peacefully tonight indeed.

@PPSainity

14 күн бұрын

@@hoon_sol whatever gotta tell yourself my dude.

@hoon_sol

13 күн бұрын

@@PPSainity: I'm just stating the facts. Saying "backpeddling" is an extremely common misspelling of "backpedaling", and not something you accidentally type when trying to spell "backpedaling" instead. That's the big difference between the two. Now show some gratitude for the correction, so that you don't embarrass yourself to others in the future by making that misspelling.

This is weed arguing with coke.

@ternell25

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@dANNNimal

3 жыл бұрын

Under rated comment.

@davei2938

3 жыл бұрын

LMFAO

@mattdrewdrums

3 жыл бұрын

Nah. This is logic arguing with ideological bullshit.

@jvq9053

3 жыл бұрын

😂

Why did I choose to click on this and feel pain for 20 minutes.

@caitthecat

3 жыл бұрын

Cuz it hurts so good.

@edwingeorge6094

3 жыл бұрын

I don't know, I feel a little better about myself.

@robertodegolladojr992

3 жыл бұрын

Because its a woman

@rhythemandpoetry

3 жыл бұрын

Because attempting to understand others means more to you than holding your opinions higher than others.

@piggamer3154

3 жыл бұрын

All of these comment replies are massive copes. Dont let them tell you this video isn't pure pain that hasn't brought out anything good to think or feel about yourself or anyone or anything

This convo is 5 years old. Where does Rogan stand now?

@hurricane0064

Ай бұрын

He still feels the same way because he’s not full blown MAGA, he still at least believes in science, something you probably don’t understand

@chocolateforever63

Ай бұрын

@@hurricane0064 Aww! Did your leftist feelings get hurt? The science shows that You are A Dick!

@chocolateforever63

Ай бұрын

@@hurricane0064 Ok Hurricane! The science guy! Haha!

@hurricane0064

Ай бұрын

@@chocolateforever63 earth is very much round you illiterate trash

@hurricane0064

Ай бұрын

@@chocolateforever63 bet you think Isaac Newton is a brand of cookies you uneducated 🐈

Really shows somebody’s intelligence when they over use “like” and “literally” as Candace does.

@yugen3968

2 ай бұрын

Too true

@Fabian_GVI

Ай бұрын

She is the absolute expert in ignoring arguments and facts. Nobody does it better

I think Joe got another forehead wrinkle during this convo

@randyyoung9892

4 жыл бұрын

Joe's a moron

@ChocoDee_Hz

4 жыл бұрын

Every time her mouth opens

@JoseEnrikes

4 жыл бұрын

Jessica W lol

@gauravbasu98

4 жыл бұрын

She believes science is not real, I believe she is shit!!!

@ramishbutt6715

4 жыл бұрын

@Very Fake News CNN Are you stupid. Scientists around the globe are saying so and warn us. Look up the greenhouse effect and look up a graph There you go

Sometimes the best answer is “I don’t know”

@deem10

4 жыл бұрын

Jeffrey Gandara takes humility, she doesn’t have that

@joelmusso1242

4 жыл бұрын

@@deem10 Agreed. Everyone is an expert about their uneducated views on all things.

@khazarhay

4 жыл бұрын

not when its global warming, the answer should always be yes there is

@budgetsneakerhead3291

4 жыл бұрын

Climate change should be discussed between two scientists

@acohen1980

4 жыл бұрын

How thick are you dweebs?...there is not one iota of credible peer reviewed scientific data which show a connection between global warming & global climate change...NOTHING.....local and regional weather/climate variations ..yes...and that's been known since the mid 19th century......but that has nothing to do with global warming trends......the IPCC are frauds....pathetic, amateur frauds who have stolen billions of research funds from legitimate scientists.....thus the US, China, Russia, Australia et etc will continue to build coal fired power plants cos they have nothing to do with global warming PS: it's the Sun, silly......ha ha ha ha

OMG... IRREGARDLESS IS NOT A WORD!!! Just wanted to mention that. Drives me NUTS!

@bear3663

3 ай бұрын

It is a word though.

@SolipsisStudios

3 ай бұрын

​@@bear3663 Only because it has been used so heavily. Its "definition" is regardless. The prefix ir is intended to change the meaning of the root word to the opposite of the root word. So irregardless should be the opposite of regardless which is essentially equivalent to saying nothing but instead its definition is stated as the very word it is meant to negate. It doesn't make any sense.

@bear3663

3 ай бұрын

@@SolipsisStudios I'm glad that we can agree that it is a word. Language evolves, or we wouldn't have most of the words we have today.

@Sam-rf6ev

2 ай бұрын

It is a word now. It’s still entirely de-necessary though

@summerevans8286

2 ай бұрын

@@Sam-rf6ev I realized that once I commented on it. But it is definitely de necessary lol

You can't tell someone they can't have a opinion. In her opinion she doesn't agree, Joe is frustrared she won't agree with him. He wants her to agree so badly, I can feel it through my screen.

@LAVISHGREEDY

4 ай бұрын

He just wants her to agree that she doesn’t know. The way she comes across is like someone that doesn’t believe in climate change and is not open to it

@JaniMorrow84

4 ай бұрын

@@LAVISHGREEDY some people don't believe in it. You can't convince everyone to feel the way you feel. I've tried in the past it doesn't work.

@raz922

3 ай бұрын

@@JaniMorrow84the overall point Joe was trying to make was why have an opinion on something you know nothing about

@JaniMorrow84

3 ай бұрын

@raz922 It's an opinion none the less, people have opinions on all sorts of matters with or without proper facts. One person's truth can be another person's lie.

@tonitonchev8589

3 ай бұрын

@@JaniMorrow84 opinions are overrated in their "sanctity" depending on what is being talked about. if I say "in my opinion, cars dont run on fuel but they run on a hamster that eats the petrol and then spins a wheel" or "in my opinion the moon is made of cheese" it doesnt mean anyone needs to respect my opinion. everyone can have any kind of opinion on any given thing, that doesnt mean that these opinions are equally valid or that someone shouldnt be challenged on it.

Joe Rogan's patience and willingness to listen to people he disagrees with is so refreshing.

@brawnerbandwidthmusic2529

3 жыл бұрын

I’ll give Joe credit every time when he’s critical 👍

@jaguaranmusk3703

3 жыл бұрын

Joe Rogan needs to get himself educated around this subject. He and others in the comment section need to know how deep the rabbit hole runs. For starters, begin your adventure with Al Gore's professor. I promise you, it is damn good ride and it will change you completely whenever they start whining about climate change.

@stacychew4175

3 жыл бұрын

She’s is very nice to look at but not that bright. He has more patience than I.

@jack.20f74

3 жыл бұрын

@@stacychew4175 Oh bc you've seen one video of her talking about a topic that she barely knew about and Rogan stuck to because he wanted to make her look bad. Okay Stacy.

@chrisjoshua69420

3 жыл бұрын

all of us as human beings needa strive to be like this honestly

-there is no evidence Joe: here is some evidence - I don’t believe you .... Politics

@chrisordonez9896

3 жыл бұрын

No just Candace

@destroyermaker

3 жыл бұрын

People

@lovinmclovin5290

3 жыл бұрын

She's wrong about Global Warming... but her point is she has an opinion and she doesn't know much about it but if someone sits down with her she can change her mind. Nothing wrong with that.

@ljdamann54

3 жыл бұрын

Lovin McLovin but Joes point is that if you don’t know.. don’t have an opinion... she “claims ignorance” at same time as “it’s a hoax”, those 2 can’t be mutually exclusive ... it’s a problem in political commentary and people in general

@davidfuller9373

3 жыл бұрын

Tobias..no Candace just makes everyone that's in a debate with her she makes the look dumb lol 😂..

Funding ABSOLUTELY affects scientific results

@xBonafidexProdigy

3 ай бұрын

Yeah Joe and his fans here are way too idealistic.

@JavedAlam24

2 ай бұрын

Yeah as in the funding of oil companies produces the small discrepancy, that has been proven. You've got it the wrong way around. Who do you think has more money? Scientists or oil cartels? I can't believe this fact isn't obvious to people.

@Stanley_Baby

Ай бұрын

Yes science can be manipulated

@SwordTune

Ай бұрын

And we can usually spot it, because results have to be replicated.

I am embarrassed for Candace. Not her finest hour….

i watched this stoned & it made my high go away

@TheReal5limeB4by

4 жыл бұрын

Alex Ignacio Jovel 😂😂😂😂

@alecnolastname4362

4 жыл бұрын

Second.

@downhilldaddy9346

4 жыл бұрын

Alex Ignacio Jovel yea cause rogan is like an jr. high principal

@KP-sh9he

4 жыл бұрын

Facts rogan act like you gotta straddle the fence all the time

@sanpeter3377

4 жыл бұрын

Alex Ignacio Jovel I was gonna watch this while high, saw your comments, now I’m not gonna watc it.

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein

@debrahoffman2031

3 жыл бұрын

Einstein was a shill to market on. He even admitted Tesla was smarter.

@FuturePast2019

3 жыл бұрын

Albert thought the Milky Way was the universe. Human stupidity can be read every day about climate change. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pG2dydGofLrUcpM.html

@lucasloucetios164

3 жыл бұрын

Debra Hoffman ayyyy 🤣🤣🤣 your idiocy is beyond measure innit ? Roger Penrose was just awarded the nobel prize for his mathematical models that prove the existence of black holes as a prediction of Einstein's theory of general relativity. Meanwhile you’re an oxygen thief 🤷

@jinibeckets9938

3 жыл бұрын

Ooooooh. Einstein.... The guy who was ridiculed by the "scientific consensus" and his "collogues" for his theories and who famously said “Why 100? If I were wrong, one would have been enough." in response to them trying to discredit him even though he was later proven correct?... That guy? So much for consensus and Majority.

@basedmod2139

3 жыл бұрын

@@darianjohnston1658 what the fuck are you talking about? Have you ever read a single physics paper in your life?

Ask Irish people about global warming, they can’t wait for it 😂😂

@darrenlally9386

2 ай бұрын

I’m Irish but what do u mean by that

@MarkStoddard

Ай бұрын

I’d bet they’d settle for colder weather if it kept Ireland Irish

@Stanley_Baby

Ай бұрын

@@MarkStoddard😂

@Stanley_Baby

Ай бұрын

I wish it would hurry up, not that it’s real of course

Where is the full episode???

@nard_0

2 ай бұрын

It's on Spotify (episode #1125)

There's a word "Fremdschämen" in German. It's a mixture of feeling acute embarrassment and deep shame for another person.

@Sam-cr5wn

3 жыл бұрын

Steve Hardy literally how I feel Rn 😂

@kakashisensei8419

3 жыл бұрын

We call it "second hand embarrassment"

@yobama9890

3 жыл бұрын

@@kakashisensei8419 we call it cringe

@dannyb20vtec28

3 жыл бұрын

It’s called cringe in america

@kevinchang5465

3 жыл бұрын

There is a word in Spanish come mierda Google translate for this. Thats whats going on here. GW is real

Candace Owens: "As I travel around the world and see different parts of the country"

@Bigfoot985

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@jackwestcott4469

3 жыл бұрын

She travels the same world where NFL teams are World Champs.

@thegreywarden9983

3 жыл бұрын

I mean...that isn’t an incorrect sentence. You can travel around the world AND see different parts of the U.S. I don’t agree with her, I’m just saying it’s not a bad sentence technically speaking.

@keepspace5258

3 жыл бұрын

Honestly Candice is an idiot

@realDrunyrun

3 жыл бұрын

Perhaps the key word here is.... And

It's human nature to have opinions on everything brought to our attention, and expert knowledge is not a prerequisite.

@kaashviagarwal565

2 ай бұрын

But not being open to learn is the problem

@joeb5230

2 ай бұрын

@@kaashviagarwal565 In general, yes. Not being open to learning is a problem. But it depends on what is being learned, as well as where and when.

THE PROBLEM IS: she’s disbelieving as a DEFAULT. that’s insane. the DEFAULT should be neutral. “i don’t know” is so much wiser than sure disbelief by default.

@cl20999

4 жыл бұрын

Very well said. We all have bias and skepticism but you can't just begin every topic assuming it's a conspiracy and a lie.

@otaviolimirio1

4 жыл бұрын

Nobody knows. It's not even a consensus in the scientific community. She's totally correct in just giving her opinion and saying what she believes or not. Believing is different than knowing. Joe, on the other side, has been pushing her all time to agreeing with his stance.

@drunkenskeleton299

4 жыл бұрын

Otavio Limirio Farias it is literally 97% of active scientists. That is about as much of a consensus as you can get from the scientific community. It is a real thing. The only argument to be had on it is whether or not climate change is the result of human interaction.

@codmott286

4 жыл бұрын

@@otaviolimirio1 Believing is not different than knowing. Belief just means you think you know. If you dont know how to perform open heart surgery you dont say "i dont believe it's possible". You say "i dont know wtf im talking about so I'm going to stand back and let the experts handle this". She's somehow trying to have it both ways, by saying she neither understands the subject but also has enough information to flat out reject it, which makes no sense.

@y2kblackout

4 жыл бұрын

No, that's not the problem and disbelief should be the default. The problem is that she doesn't understand and confines to maintain her default position.

"I don't believe in global warming" "Based on what?" *shrug*

@ihatcher

5 жыл бұрын

Based on the fact that we are going through a cooling period for the last 15 years lol

@shawnh4454

5 жыл бұрын

Lmao.

@mezzaninex

5 жыл бұрын

A B You probably shouldn't use articles written by Christopher Booker. He believes in intelligent design and denies evolution and he also claims that asbestos and second hand smoke don't increase your risk of developing cancer. He is what you would call, a complete fucking moron.

@LEDGER0404

5 жыл бұрын

Read above and I have lots more!

@AwesomeBlackDude

5 жыл бұрын

Who's more corrupt in Congress between the Republicans and the Democrats? " When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations it's so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear is how corrupt the Democrats are. So why don't we break it down by president and the numbers. Obama (D) - 8yrs in office. zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. so the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as "scandal free" they aren't speaking wishfully, they're simply telling the truth. Bush, George W. (R) - 8yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences. Clinton (D) - 8yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. one conviction. one prison sentence. that's right nearly 8yrs of investigations. tens of millions spent and 30yrs of claiming them the most corrupt ever and there was exactly one person convicted of a crime. Bush, George H. W. (R) - 4yrs in office. one indictment. one conviction. one prison sentence. Reagan (R) - 8yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences. Carter (D) - 4yrs in office. one indictment. zero convictions and zero prison sentences. Ford (R) - 2 1/2 yrs in office. one indictment and one conviction. one prison sentence. Pardoned Richard Nixon. Nixon (R) - 6yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences. Johnson (D) - 5yrs in office. zero indictments. zero convictions. zero prison sentences. So, let’s see where that leaves us. in the last 53 years Democrats have been in office for 25 of those years while Republicans held it for 28. in their 25yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That's one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership. In the 28yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That's more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren't really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn't found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford. So, those only serve to make Republicans look even worse. With everything going on with Trump and his people right now, it's a safe bet Republicans are gonna be padding their numbers a bit real soon. So let's just go over the numbers one more time shall we. 120 indictments for Republicans. 89 convictions and 34 prison sentences. Those aren't "feelings" or "alternate facts" those are simply the stats by the numbers. Republicans are, and have been for my entire lifetime, the most criminally corrupt party to hold the office of the presidency.

Joe still has lots to learn about the real world we live in.

@allroundlad

5 ай бұрын

You still have an education to form, people dedicate their lives studying this. Don't sit on your ass and call them liars, where's your degree or PHD?

@Roanokewood

5 ай бұрын

@@allroundlad FED

@allroundlad

5 ай бұрын

@@Roanokewood Dumb and dumber.

@Chhhottaaadonn

3 ай бұрын

😂 these are dumb conservative Christian idiots​@@allroundlad

@joeysandoval9823

Ай бұрын

And what do you have?

This is one of the wildest back and forths

"Think about who we were in bed with, Saudi Arabia... Trump came in and said NO!" Yeah, this claim didn't age well.

@Zarrakon

5 жыл бұрын

Horribly.

@Ragnarok1979

5 жыл бұрын

In bed as far as what? If it's selling arms to Saudi, then it's been done by previous administrations multiple times over the years

@oppie2363

5 жыл бұрын

LoweRider Her claim is that Hillary Clinton was in bed with the Saudis *and* that Donald Trump changed that. Even supposing that he is doing exactly what past presidents had done*, you need to meet the other half of the claim: how did "Trump came in and said NO" with regard to the Saudis? Saying that he continued with business as usual with the Saudis does not meet that burden. *Ignoring, for example, that past presidents weren't making those sales over the objections of Congress in the wake of one of the most significant international human rights scandal of the past decade. The action is hardly the same when the context changes that much: it's one thing to buy some jewelry from a pawn shop, it's another thing to buy from that same pawn shop 10 minutes after the cops tell you that the pawn broker is a fence for local burglars.

@stevenrivers8386

5 жыл бұрын

LoweRider Ok. Trump said he would not be in bed with saudi arabia. Then sells $10 billion in weapons to them. Yea previous administrations did. But wasnt trump supposed to be different and end those corrupt practices? Yea fuckin right gimme a break. He did the opposite. Its ok you will concoct some excuse for him.

@AngryVet44

5 жыл бұрын

She obviously ignored the picture of trump holding that light sphere with the king of Saudi Arabia and all the gifts they gave him🙄but she’s a talking head being paid by the Koch Brothers to deny everything true and blame liberals for the world’s woes. www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/world/middleeast/trump-glowing-orb-saudi.html

she literally said "the weather is different today from yesterday" did she not learn in sixth grade the difference between weather and climate 💀

@lolitah8560

3 жыл бұрын

I almost lost it bawhahahahaha

@anidynamic

3 жыл бұрын

Welcome to Trumpworld. What happened to intelligent conservatives? These are not conservatives, they are Trumpers.

@sly6757

3 жыл бұрын

@Real Progressives Allowed exactly

@lukehumphrey5236

3 жыл бұрын

😭😭😂😂😂

@charlestremblay9028

3 жыл бұрын

@Real Progressives Allowed even if weather and climate mean the same thing, it’s still really stupid to compare the weather which varies everyday to the climate which is an average of the weather of a region or of a period of time

Rogan is so busy trying to prove her opinion wrong, he doesn't value her right to have an opinion. It's pathetic when his ego gets in the way of common sense

@hoon_sol

14 күн бұрын

Which flavor of ice cream you like is an opinion. What the facts are are not an opinion. Disagreeing with the facts of reality just makes her blatantly wrong, that's got nothing to do with "opinion". What's pathetic is when the ego of an absolute moron like Owens gets in the way of her acknowledging the facts of reality.

I feel like i'm watching someone else. Is this how candace used to be? Her personality is so different it makes it hard to even recognise her!

@hoon_sol

14 күн бұрын

Is that a joke? She's literally no different at all, except maybe better at manipulating gullible morons.

Joe was low key irritated and I’m all for it 😂

@rahulmahbubani1392

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly only a fool needs evidence. Why is research so goddamn important can't you just feel how horrible the climate has, I mean it's no brainier

@xmidgewon736

4 жыл бұрын

I wish I had Joe's patience...

@stupacx3192

4 жыл бұрын

He keeps it cool though

@DDogg43777

4 жыл бұрын

rahul mahbubani Climate Change isn't about how you feel climate has been changing, it's more about global changes across larger scales of time. So saying you feel it's gotten hotter isn't a good argument for climate change. Instead, point to all the scientific evidence of climate change.

@DXDJXD

4 жыл бұрын

Joe was HIGH KEY irritated ahahaha

“I don’t want to die on this hill” Proceeds to die on the hill 😂

@javierharo285

4 жыл бұрын

Bruh 😂😂

@nyboy76

4 жыл бұрын

So you even know what that means???

@Dylanbolton69

4 жыл бұрын

Jeremiah Hessian yeah I think he knows what it means

@goldenheartOh

4 жыл бұрын

Well, Joe kept pushing her back up the hill.

@hepwo91222

4 жыл бұрын

Candace doesn't make a good argument, but Joe arrogantly saying anthropogenic climate change is scientifically proven is not true.

Majority opinion doesn't always and in every situation determine truth or right or wrong. To think that it does is extremely naive and illogical. The empirical outcomes of our elections for example speaks to this.

@user-uv5qr3gc4i

27 күн бұрын

It’s not the same as a public majority opinion. These are people who devote their lives to studying this and are incredibly accomplished in their field. It’s not the same as asking John from Kansas what he thinks about climate change. Bad example

Come on Joe, you don’t think this has been politicized?

Albert Einstein: “The Difference Between Stupidity and Genius Is That Genius Has Its Limits”

@joewilliams5278

3 жыл бұрын

There is a limit to stupidity. Its called death.

@sheikmutanabi3003

3 жыл бұрын

That’s not the limit to stupidity, that’s the limit of everything

@joewilliams5278

3 жыл бұрын

@@sheikmutanabi3003i feel as tho stupidity would be included in "everything"...

@overprime3978

3 жыл бұрын

Derrick Henry why are you trying to sound smart when you know what he’s getting at. Who are u tryna impress lmao

@falsofacu

3 жыл бұрын

This is a fake quote, he never said this.

When she said “the weather was different than it was today” that told me she had no idea what climate is

@danielbaker7213

3 жыл бұрын

So can you explain to me why it went from global cooling, to global warming, then too climate change? Why does the name always change?

@TheTinyTimmyTimTim

3 жыл бұрын

@@danielbaker7213 Because that's how science works. Once you are confronted with data that changes the reality of what your talking about, the name shifts to more accurately reflect that data. edit: also, if your goal is to convince laymen, people without no scientific background, that this highly complicated issue IS an issue, your going to try to use a name that will translate the best to the common population. Global warming was too inaccurate and reductive and confused the morons who went "OH BUT SOME PLACES ARE COLDER" so they changed it.

@the_illegitimate_jedi3479

3 жыл бұрын

@@danielbaker7213 THAT'S what your argument is?

@bboybreezi2417

3 жыл бұрын

@@danielbaker7213 did you skip science class in school 😂

@kenwie9097

3 жыл бұрын

I remember learning in middle school science class weather is the day to day state of the atmosphere and climate is the long term state. She lost all credibility on the issue when she failed to understand that

I understand Joe and Candace. Joe is making this hard. Candace made a simple point she don't believe what she see on certain sites and she wonder if the people funding them are political or if they are doing something bad. Joe want Candace to admit why she believe something she don't know when she keep explaining why.

He wants to manipulate and convince Candace to say what he wants her to say.🤦🏽‍♀️

@markporter8196

5 ай бұрын

Yeah I was kinda getting that as well.

@harezothman31

3 ай бұрын

No, he is trying to justify and explain how belief and opinions dont matter regarding scientific facts.

YOU DARE QUESTION JAMIES SOURCING SKILLS?!?!

@Texasmade7739

4 жыл бұрын

chris wells young Jamie checked her quick

“I wouldn’t die on this hill” *dies on hill for 20 minutes*

@SliceofBread123

3 жыл бұрын

This felt like an hour, not 20 minutes... my god

@saitohshihomi5649

3 жыл бұрын

m3lon San, What Does Candace Owens_Farmer mean by her statement to Joe Rogan: " I'm Not So Sure, I Would Die on the Hill for It" ? I am so very Sorry, I do not Understand.

@fartpimpson3843

3 жыл бұрын

@@saitohshihomi5649 the fuck is wrong with you?

@helenrichards2762

3 жыл бұрын

Yyyeessss that's fucking hilarious!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@digitaldecoy2072

3 жыл бұрын

Not true. Joe is arguing that we must all be scientifically agnostic... She is creating a hypothesis based on data too... This is America and the coversation is more about her belief of disbelief... Joe was so busy trying to convince her to stand on the fence that he didn't bother to take a beat to consider whether or not there may be truth in her Candace's suspicions that climate change has been hijacked by politics and people who can capitalize off of it... Just pause and think about how big the green industry is and how much money and trash is made from it. In NYC there are home owners and landlords who are removing perfectly good fixtures to update to green fixtures... Do you know how much money and garbage (that isn't biodegradable or recyclable) that generates? Candace's reservations are valid. But, instead of examining her point further Joe decides to try dragging her for saying she doesn't believe. Stay on the topic and destroy her argument instead or deflecting and attempting to assassinate her belief, or lack of belief system...

Joe: asks guest a question. Guest: answers question. Joe: how dare you answer in such a way, you're not an expert?!

@allroundlad

5 ай бұрын

He didn't ask a question, she stupidly said she doesn't think anyone should care about the environment which Joe found very hard to ignore and that's how it started.

@joeb5230

5 ай бұрын

​@@allroundlad He didn't ask a question? Really?! Joe asks a question at: :32 - "What do you think's causing that?" 1:04 - "In what way?" 7:21 - "But why have a belief?" 9:12 - "But why are you saying that you don't think it exists, though?" 11:00 - "But why have an opinion on something that you don't have data about?" 12:00 - "Science has been politicized?" 14:32 - "But why then say you don't believe in it?!"

@allroundlad

5 ай бұрын

@@joeb5230 Yeah after he starts asking questions because she said something really stupid and as the host, he's allowed to ask questions especially when it's concerning her saying really ignorant things. Unfortunately it never got through her thick skull that what she was saying was utter shite but he tried.

@joeb5230

5 ай бұрын

@@allroundlad Lemme get this straight. You stated that Joe Rogan didn't ask a question. When I provide you with quotes and timestamps proving that he asked Candace several, your response is that he didn't begin asking questions until after she said something that, in your subjective opinion, was 'stupid'. *sigh* Where to begin? First, you just acknowledged that he asked her questions after her statement, thus invalidating your claim that he didn't ask her questions. Second, you failed to notice that his first two questions were asked before her statement. Third, you failed to grasp that at no point in any of my comments have I weighed in on either side of the climate discussion. In my original comment I was pointing out that Joe was not performing his duties as interviewer to the same standards that he usually does. He asked for his guest's opinion repeatedly, trying to convince her to change her answer between each question. Regardless of the intelligence of a guest's answer, repeatedly posing the same question is bad form as an interviewer. His question was asked and answered several times, and he had lost his objectivity in the process. That was my point.

@allroundlad

4 ай бұрын

@@joeb5230 Yes the podcaster asked questions, I misspoke. Here's your medal. Do you not know Joe? He's always drilling into people that have controversial, stupid opinions. Just look at him and Eddie bravo going at it so there was no different treatment here, this is how he always is. Secondly, don't play that game. You don't need to state your opinion on the topic because it's obvious what side you stand on after rushing to Candace's defence, doesn't take a genius to work that out. How about you just cut the crap and explain why you're even supporting her ludicrous waffle. Anyone with a brain can see that Joe has substantial talking points and Candace was "dying on that hill" after saying she wasn't going to do that because she doesn't infact know what the eff she's talking about.

Don’t argue with stupid people because they will drag you to their level and beat you with experience. Mark Twain

@steveharveyhd5289

3 жыл бұрын

It’s difficult to argue with geniuses. But impossible to argue with morons.

@insanegenius5321

3 жыл бұрын

Which one is the stupid one? I hoping your talking Candace

@wbucrash6492

3 жыл бұрын

@Your Older Brother you're right it was you

@louiemoreno6358

2 жыл бұрын

@@insanegenius5321 Candice is the moron who can’t listen to any perspectives besides trumpsters

@louiemoreno6358

2 жыл бұрын

@@steveharveyhd5289 exactly so just let Candice Owens speak because stupidity from her won’t stop 🛑

This is exactly the reason why I don't have a political party. You begin to identify with the party and always side with it even on issues in which it's wrong in.

@jonlosius7939

3 жыл бұрын

You’re doing great. Keep being you, and don’t fall under the tribe mentality curse.

@corny165

3 жыл бұрын

Never a truer word. Even thoughtful, clearly intelligent members of each group fall into the same trap. Candace said one truism in this clip but the significance was lost on her...at 4:48 she said "instead of looking for what you're searching for why don't you look up what you're not searching for". She's right. You could easily justify the opposite viewpoint of that was your goal and this betrays a real truth. In todays age a layperson can find evidence to corroborate any viewpoint they wish to hold. Confirmation bias and a limitless database of knowledge, opinion, spin, etc make it a simple matter. Did you ever watch a flat Earth video? They pull 'facts' from everywhere. It's almost convincing. Almost!

@letBIGGIErest

3 жыл бұрын

FACTS

@vexxvortex1882

3 жыл бұрын

that's not true. That's called identity politics and you shouldn't play that game. They play it a lot in the west but just because someone sides with a party that doesn't mean you believe everything one party does.

@Burt_Sampson

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t have a political party either but I’d never vote Democrat. I’d rather not vote at all

Joe: "you don't think we have to care about the environment?" Candace: "(laughing) no, not even a little bit." WOW. Even with her following statements. STILL WOW.

I feel like what she should’ve said is that she’s skeptical on how its being dealt with

I can't even listen to this. How did he sit there for 2+ hours. That martial arts discipline must be something else

@MaximusTheChosenOne

4 жыл бұрын

Lmao that was funny

@hepwo91222

4 жыл бұрын

He was being rude to her and condescending. Newsflash, anthropogenic climate change is not a proven scientific fact, its barely a theory.

@jakjam300

4 жыл бұрын

@@hepwo91222 Newsflash, it was 65 farenheit a few days ago in Antarctica. Newsflash, the UN report *made up of scientists* confirmed that we know that we are accelerating climate change at a dangerous rate. Newsflash, the only people who gain from denying climate change is oil companies who trash the environment.

@tylerforde87

4 жыл бұрын

@@hepwo91222 I'm on the side of Joe where I don't know enough about it to have an opinion on it. I don't care how many scientists say things or how much evidence they claim to have. I don't know therefore I won't claim to know and I don't care to know. Humans will be killed off but the earth will be just fine. I couldn't literally not care any less.

@hepwo91222

4 жыл бұрын

@@jakjam300 you have been brainwashed by the MSM and globalist politicians. Anthropogenic climate change is unproven, it fails the scientific method every... single... time. Also the climate models are based on incomplete data due to our inability to predict the movement of water vapor more than a few hours/days. So maybe one day when we can solve Navier-Stokes equations we can predict future climate but as of now, we cannot.

Ignorance = Not knowing something. Stupidity = Not knowing something and having an ego about it.

@micahhull5126

8 ай бұрын

So Joe is stupid!

@drtimoshea4087

8 ай бұрын

exactly. like joe's doing here.

@xxraneenxx3

8 ай бұрын

@@drtimoshea4087sit down Candace

@watching1513

7 ай бұрын

@@drtimoshea4087 the delusion is strong with you, young one 😅

@robinstheel6884

7 ай бұрын

@@TNTobin Ignorance is a lack of knowledge or understanding. Deliberate ignorance is a culturally-induced phenomenon, the study of which is called agnotology. "knowing better but doing the wrong thing anyway." Immoral describes people who can differentiate between right and wrong but intentionally do wrong anyway. Irrational would also describe such a behavior.

In my opinion, we must have an educated society before to talk about Climate change because people tend to be ignorant especially, the celebrities, who are able to talk about an issue like this without knowledge when they're asked. Nevertheless, as Jurgen Klopp once said; "It's not important about famous people say", when I heard that, everything made me sense. By the way, I wish I had also seen Greta Thumberg as a guest to argue over Climate Change with Joe.

What running from accountability looks like..........

“You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.” - ― Daniel Patrick Moynihan

@ox3505

3 жыл бұрын

Russian Bot8269 but we are making it worse

@ox3505

3 жыл бұрын

Joe Rogan : Excuse me sir, but I do believe you've dropped your wallet. This chick : Doesn't look familiar to me. Joe Rogan : What? I just saw you drop it. Here. This chick : Nope, it's not mine. Joe Rogan: It is yours. I am trying to be a good person and return it to you. This chick : Return what to who? Joe Rogan : [facepalms, then shows Patrick his ID] Aren't you Patrick Star? This chick : Yup. Joe Rogan : And this is your ID. This chick : Yup. Joe Rogan : I found this ID in this wallet. And if that's the case, this must be your wallet. This chick : That makes sense to me. Joe Rogan : Then take it. This chick : It's not my wallet.

@EB-du3vh

3 жыл бұрын

O X that is debatable and not proven fact you are aware of that right? The common belief is more co2 equals higher temps which is true but do you know how many factors go into the temperature of the earth ? It’s not just co2 lvls lmao

@ox3505

3 жыл бұрын

E B I do know my handful share of information about he topic i took a university course on it it’s real man we make it worse

@ox3505

3 жыл бұрын

Russian Bot8269 because everyone has a car and everyone wants cow meat plus pollution in the ocean ruin coral reefs all of which contribute to the decrease of co2 reduction

As an old Yogi once told me: If someone is actually sleeping you can wake them up, but if someone is pretending to be sleeping you can never wake them up.

@danielreardon6453

4 жыл бұрын

Just tickle them

@nataliealvarado9753

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂

What bugs me most is that we are burning coal and gas to make electricity. Using oil to make windmill blades. To me this is evidence enough to cause all of us to think before we jump into the water, just how deep is it? Can we swim well enough?

It’s funny now, Candace hasn’t changed her argument but Joe finally opened his eyes

@eriklarson9137

5 ай бұрын

Agreed. He is finally trusting the science instead of the politicians. She came off pretty dumb here, but Joe eventually came around anyway.

@benaffleckisanokayactor

5 ай бұрын

Brian, you gotta get off the internet mate

@gerrymirolla6078

4 ай бұрын

Exactly. Finally he opened his eyes.

I feel I’ve learned more about climate change through joe Rogan than anyone else tbh 😂

A device that pulls CO2 out of air .... Tree: " Am I a joke to you ?"

@Greenthumbn1576

4 жыл бұрын

I tell my fuance this all the time... They cut down millions of trees that will help us to replace it with machines. This shit is idiotic. I believe this is a contributing factor why our earth is caving in. Tree roots are strong and hold so much together. We are parasites to this earth.

@nbdb23

4 жыл бұрын

Apparently not enough people know about the function of trees, sad

@GomiBombs

4 жыл бұрын

its literally like the movie idiocracy, everyones like " it got electrolytes thats what trees crave"

@user-kx7do4fh2j

4 жыл бұрын

@@Greenthumbn1576 and sea

@gavbrown9808

4 жыл бұрын

Human beings cut down CO2 eating trees to make way for C02 producing humans! 3 billion people on earth till middle of last century. Over population is the reason for climate change

Her logic is “I don’t know wether or not you own a dog, therefore I believe you don’t own a dog”

@serclintalot4497

3 жыл бұрын

Is that what she said? Pretty sure her wording would've been "I don't believe you own a dog." Literally speaking there's a difference between "I don't believe you own a dog" and "I believe you don't own a dog", even though we interpret them the same. "I don't believe" means you have no belief either way (you don't know), "I believe you don't" means you believe the contrary. For some reason all of us interpret them the same way. I never considered the difference until she pointed out they may have a difference in linguistics. Either way she definitely should've said "I don't know" to be clear.

@Detrahere

3 жыл бұрын

More like "I don't know whether you have a dog or not, BUT, there's a dog house in your front yard, there's some dog toys and chewed up rags lying around, there's some dog shit in your backyard, the cats stay the fuck away from your house, oh and I hear some barking coming from your house. Hmmm, nope I don't buy it. You don't have a doggo."

@sub-zero5433

3 жыл бұрын

she only exists so that the right can point to her and say “seeeee? our policies aren’t racist. a black person supports them!!” a sad existence, indeed

@sub-zero5433

3 жыл бұрын

@@serclintalot4497 dude the entire video she’s like “I don’t know anything about this, but here’s my detailed opinion. very obviously trying to push the right’s climate science denial propaganda while also giving herself an out if she’s ever called out about this video

@serclintalot4497

3 жыл бұрын

@@sub-zero5433 The video only exists because he interpreted "I don't believe" to mean "I vehemently oppose" and decided to grill her on it. Yes, she should have just said "I don't know" but she tried to end it several times, he got more aggressive, and she got defensive. Regardless, what does it matter at this point? It's not like the left has any viable solutions other than griping about it and pointing fingers at the other side.

Joe Rogan says at the end I don't know shit about global warming but says he believes it lol

@sashaalex5476

4 ай бұрын

99% of scientists also believe

@planetBheen

13 күн бұрын

Neither does Owens

She felt that because he preferred Trump, he would agree with everything she says.

"The climate changes. It was different weather yesterday than it was today." LOLOL

@michaela1843

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t many conservatives that like her a few people prop her because she’s an “empowered woman” but her ignorance is incredible

@yorkieluv3708

3 жыл бұрын

@@michaela1843 I really don’t get it. And she’s been on Twitter since the election telling lie after lie and supporting the accusations that the election was rigged.

@darealfabio4

3 жыл бұрын

that line there was when I walked away...........she needs to slow it down, and think before speaking

@danembo7362

3 жыл бұрын

“I read a lot about it”

@BingeThinker1814

3 жыл бұрын

@@michaela1843 She also gets propped up because she's a person of colour promoting conservative viewpoints. She's a grifter who has to stay on character at all times. Who knows what she believes behind closed doors, tbh

Candace clearly doesn't know anything about climate change. She's too stubborn to admit it

@Skate2rev

3 жыл бұрын

actually she admits it several times..right there this here video

@materialqal

3 жыл бұрын

@@Skate2rev but her responses were always I don’t know therefore I don’t believe it to be true when it could’ve just been I don’t know

@Liza.Wharton

3 жыл бұрын

well, she wouldn't have a career if she admitted to not knowing about anything now would she

@lilcheo5658

3 жыл бұрын

@@Liza.Wharton yea

@brianvice1144

3 жыл бұрын

Yup. Another person too proud to say "I Don't Know" She's like "I don't know anything about it but I have a stance on it"

Reminds me on Ross and Phoebe arguing on evolution😂

Joe Rogan is a smart cookie

“This wouldn’t be the hill I die on” *Proceeds to die on hill

@saitohshihomi5649

3 жыл бұрын

Ahoy and Aloha, I am so very Sorry I Do Not Understand What is The Hill, Where is The Hill that WE Are Not Going to Die On? Please Clarify my ignorance!?

@Liam-uh3pr

3 жыл бұрын

@@saitohshihomi5649 she says she doesn’t believe despite knowing absolutely nothing about it. That’s the hill and joe Rogan was the one to finish her.

@Jianju69

3 жыл бұрын

@@Liam-uh3pr How exactly did he "defeat" her? By claiming that 97% of scientists believe in human-caused climate change?

@sownheard

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jianju69 by confronting her on the topic and instead of just letting it go she continues to defend her position fully aware that she knows without the knowledge. She is a drifter she spins the points To confuse the viewer fully aware of the fact that she is just trying to score political points.

@bcallahan4673

3 жыл бұрын

@@Liam-uh3pr that's half true. analyze the video and what was said. she claimed to be of the opinion that global warming wasn't a concern to her in the context of being in an international agreement where trillions were involved. joe Rogan then said, why have a belief on something you know nothing about. the difference in the understanding is the word opinion and belief, they are not the same but are used similarly to literally and figuratively.

The fact she can't understand the difference between "I don't believe in it" and "I don't know enough about it" is mind-blowing.

@mTheoriexboxl

4 жыл бұрын

She is knowing the difference. The facts just dont fit her agenda

@andreaserik6069

4 жыл бұрын

Rogan is clearly wrong here about The climate change issue and is forcefully argueing with faulty facts. You could say hes bringing forth the globalists agenda. See the respons and links to real scientists about this climate change debate: Hello Andreas! Thank you for your inquiry. This is a curious petition which seems to have been hastily put together and not well vetted. "Mickey Mouse" was one of the signatories. (attached) It has some similarities to a similar petition of some years ago with 15,000 signatories - of which Adolf Hitler had signed. blog.friendsofscience.org/2017/11/20/the-petition-of-more-than-15000-scientists-more-fakenews/ As many commentators have noted, most of the signatories do not work in climate science assessments but rather in fields like biology. While there is a component of climate change impacts on biology inherent in that field of study, climate change is measured on very long time scales of 30, 50, 100 and millennial time scales. We do not have sufficient data to make pronouncements about climate change like those made by this group. William Briggs, statistician, has written a biting critique wmbriggs.com/post/28490/ There is much debate in the climate community - the Spilman Law firm hosted this debate: kzread.info/dash/bejne/nq2Cpc5wft3QkbA.html We have hosted annual events since our inception, hoping to encourage open, public debate and to inform people of the complexities of climate science. friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=308 Dr. Judith Curry states that climate change is not a clear or present danger. wattsupwiththat.com/2019/07/16/climatologist-dr-judith-curry-climate-change-is-not-a-clear-and-present-danger/ Unfortunately, the media love frightening headlines and many environmental groups drive donations with ever more catastrophic claims. We are in favour of open, civil debate on climate and energy policies and full cost-benefit analysis. A group of international scientists have stated there is no climate emergency. kzread.info/dash/bejne/eaSKpKpmeLybf9o.html I hope this is helpful information. Best wishes, Michelle Stirling Communications Manager -- Friends of Science Society P.O. Box 23167, Mission P.O. Calgary, Alberta Canada T2S 3B1 Toll-free Telephone: 1-888-789-9597 Web: friendsofscience.org

@AllThingsFascinate

4 жыл бұрын

@@andreaserik6069 nice propaganda

@travisgowen5044

4 жыл бұрын

I'm not here to argue climate change. I'm just pointing out how much it says about someone when they would rather have an opinion about something they clearly know very little about, as opposed to having the courage to say they don't know enough about it to form an opinion in the first place. That is our current political landscape in a nutshell.

@mTheoriexboxl

4 жыл бұрын

@Andreas erik Im german and human made climate change is the consens here. But nice try strange youtube guy

People think they can actually control it which is absolutely insane

@gslwhsywv8942

2 ай бұрын

Not control, just stop causing harm that will come back to bite us in the ass in the future. Same thing as using Acutane when you have really bad acne. It’s not going to get rid of the scars and previous damage, but you won’t have to deal with bad breakouts in the future.

Shes basically sayin "i have my opinion ino im wrong but im keeping it because im too shallow to accept facts".

@chelecovers6893

4 жыл бұрын

She's paid not to accept the facts. She's a right wing grifter.

@j_f82

4 жыл бұрын

Lots of people do the same shit lol

@sinbadsailor1963

4 жыл бұрын

The so-called facts from the global warming doomsday cult is data that was fraudulently “adjusted” to prove their case. The 1930’s was always the warmest decade in recorded history until the temperatures were adjusted downward by the cult.

@lorenclark9267

4 жыл бұрын

She's a brainwashed shill who profits from spreading this nonsense.

@sinbadsailor1963

4 жыл бұрын

Tol, R. S. J. (2014). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: A re-analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 701-705. doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.045

She said nothing for 20 mins,.... she's gonna be an excellent politician...

@antoinecharlesdegaulle580

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@jenniferlorence1950

3 жыл бұрын

She is just like TRUMP. Or imitating Trump.

@hunali7343

3 жыл бұрын

Because he is forcing the question.

@antoinecharlesdegaulle580

3 жыл бұрын

@@hunali7343 he is trying to understand why she thinks that way

@hunali7343

3 жыл бұрын

@@antoinecharlesdegaulle580 she said i haven’t formed opinion and I don’t believe it in. He is like it’s science and stuff she told him she does not have an opinion.

This was painful but worth it.

People confuse the politics of climate change with the science. You might not agree with what politicians are doing about climate change but it's real. People say Evolution is a theory, evolution is a fact; evolution by natural selection is a theory.

@suarezguy

Ай бұрын

She was saying she didn't believe it (agnostic) but was focusing on disagreeing with and being real offput by the politics of it. And yes more people should be able and willing to admit it's true even while disagreeing with most of the proposed politics about it.

Never believe a word from anyone who says "I have read a SHIT TON of articles"

@ruubs9615

3 жыл бұрын

Or in one night! While it takes scientist their whole life to understand it. This lying fake poser says its not true because she read it one night! Unbelievable

@rockyp3917

3 жыл бұрын

@@ruubs9615 She thinks that she is the second coming of Einstein 🤣. Joe was very generous in calling her Intelligent.

@edaboodie6346

3 жыл бұрын

Never use absolutes.

@NigelGrab

3 жыл бұрын

@@edaboodie6346 that's in itself an absolute haha

@michaela1843

3 жыл бұрын

Haha

You can hear in her voice and see it in her eyes. This is what happens when you surrender your critical faculties to group-think and identity politics.

@MickeyO365

3 жыл бұрын

powerful

@bryanf1091

3 жыл бұрын

You think she's serious? I always had the idea that she's just exploiting a base for financial gain. Even in this video, there's a couple times when she seems like she doesn't even believe the bullshit coming out of her mouth. I think it's all an act. She's no better than that Tom MacDonald rapper, who does the same exact thing.

@MickeyO365

3 жыл бұрын

@@bryanf1091 she’s 100% exploiting but when you say stuff numerous times no matter how big the lie is you eventually start to believe it.

@jaydenlangmead9667

3 жыл бұрын

@@bryanf1091 I guess it comes down to what serious means. Whether or not she really believes it ends up being kind of irrelevant if she's willing to act as though it's true for extended periods of time. As we saw with Trump, if people are willing to exploit falsehoods for personal gain, it sets the world back precisely the amount to which it's exploited, whether it's true or not.

@ArisaemaTriphyllum

3 жыл бұрын

Or sell your soul for the $

Its fact that the earth changes all the time...look back hundreds of years ago..CYCLES

@marian5967

2 ай бұрын

Hundreds of years ago were humans dumping harsh chemicals into our bodies of water? Were we cutting down the forests and Amazon at such a high rate for bleached toilet paper??? Taking down trees in the Amazon to make a self tanner???

Give me an accurate 5 day forecast and I will believe a 100 year one.

@nataliealvarado9753

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Reclining_Spuds

3 ай бұрын

@nataliealvarado9753 I know, right? 🤣

@jessejzcutter4291

2 ай бұрын

😂😂… this is good

@dogwklr

2 ай бұрын

You can model temperature increasing by x amount no doubt but you can NEVER predict how that wildly complex system will behave once we reach those temperatures never mind to predict it accurately and reliably. They present warming as boiling now, what utter shit 😂 The earth will not be on fire if its as warm as the time of the dinosaurs, it will be so green and abundant in a higher carbon environment. The people who lied and are all the covid shit up are the same type as the climate operatives

He is so patient, this is almost like therapy.

@quantumofhate

3 жыл бұрын

I THINK I NEED THERAPY AFTER WATCHING SOME OF THIS......

@LeeKao

3 жыл бұрын

@@quantumofhate I wish someone in my life would speak to me so patiently about my worst thoughts and ideas

@troyrichardson6575

3 жыл бұрын

Please tell me you're being sarcastic?

@aloha_ohana

3 жыл бұрын

@@troyrichardson6575 I hope he is. She was pretty patient putting up with him interrupting her the whole time. What's funny is they both agree for the most part but Joe felt the need to act like there was some conflict to boost ratings, lol

@nikk2472

3 жыл бұрын

@@aloha_ohana Oh Dave you silly little dolt.

“Who are they polling?” “...... scientists”

@jonesynahmeen9088

4 жыл бұрын

robby cox she is beyond irritating

@pawpaw3106

4 жыл бұрын

Of the 10,000 or so scientists who are saying this, how many of them get their funding from companies or businesses that would profit from it

@SliceofBread123

4 жыл бұрын

“Scientists? Must be democrats.”

@whiskeycompany13

4 жыл бұрын

@Desert Ratt and what makes you think Candace isn’t being paid by people who benefit from fossil fuels?

@rickysmith923

4 жыл бұрын

Creed Thoughts don’t expect a response

I can't believe she is considered a respected voice.

She's a very wise good woman joe should listen this lady

"the climate changes everyday!" Honey, that's the weather. Not the worldwide climate

@sitrep2418

4 жыл бұрын

She didnt say that. She said it always changed.

@johndowns3839

4 жыл бұрын

@@sitrep2418 But how much does she really know about it? She'd be utterly lost two minutes into a climate science examination. You know it and I know it.

@tln25

4 жыл бұрын

Show me the evidence that humans affect the total temperature of the planet. Oh, and do it without NOAA adjusting data. And go.

@foxxy2583

4 жыл бұрын

@@tln25 www.ucsusa.org/resources/are-humans-major-cause-global-warming www.eea.europa.eu/themes/climate/faq/how-do-human-activities-contribute-to-climate-change-and-how-do-they-compare-with-natural-influences rses.anu.edu.au/research/research-stories/humans-have-caused-climate-change-180-years www.edf.org/climate/9-ways-we-know-humans-triggered-climate-change And I'm sure, even with all this statistical information and scientific explanations, you will still come up with some bullshit to say it's fake. And if you do, why don't you provide evidence as to why it's not caused by humans.

@kalminmequel

4 жыл бұрын

@@sitrep2418 correct she didn't say the climate changes everyday - she said the climate always changes. It's not unusual to see mis-quotes. "So what you're saying is.."

Pulls up .com site. "They're just interested in money." Pulls up .org site. "Who are they polling?" Pulls up .gov site. "You can't trust the government." Pulls up climate denial geocities site with clip art and pink text on pink background. "Now this one I trust."

@Phuskooz

3 жыл бұрын

Hilariously, her website is a .com site (I bet she has something to say about .pizza sites too)

@FuturePast2019

3 жыл бұрын

@Fl Beats And CNN ? Predictions? Facts: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pG2dydGofLrUcpM.html

@br0dy32

3 жыл бұрын

I don't know how anyone can ever believe *anything* if you are that cynical...

@johndeoliveira8476

3 жыл бұрын

Shes so close minded

@FuturePast2019

3 жыл бұрын

@@johndeoliveira8476 She used to be ... a democrat. Sorry.

despite a dramatic rise in greenhouse gas emissions, global temperatures actually decreased from 1940 to 1970. What’s more, the models we use to predict the future aren’t able to accurately describe the climate of the past, suggesting they are deeply flawed.

@user-qx7vp6ol8c

2 ай бұрын

Thank you. Do you know how long it took to finally find a comment here with a valid point to add to the discussion originally being had. My gut tells me that Candace is right. Yes we play a factor but climate changes regardless.

The funny part is today 2024 Joe Rogan has a 180° opposite view

@adelmasto

4 ай бұрын

He doesn’t. He’s arguing here that humans affect the climate changing which is true. He still believes that to be true but understands changes like this have always happened.

Joe: “you have this opinion with no evidence” Candice: “that’s what a Opinion is” Joe: “or you can do research”

@callumrock11lol76

3 жыл бұрын

She’s never heard the term “well educated opinion” but then again she probably doesn’t know what educated means

@Justin33B

3 жыл бұрын

@@callumrock11lol76 education doesn’t mean you’re right. Just like college these days teaches bs 20% of the time.

@scytheblade7151

3 жыл бұрын

Research.... every right wingers Kryptonite

@xNazgrel

3 жыл бұрын

Do research never means do and actual scientific research on your own. Now it's time for aliens.👽

@xNazgrel

3 жыл бұрын

It's proven bro. I am right wing, conservative, anti-communist, anti-sjw, anti-big state and I believe in climate change. It's proven by science. Not flat-earth bs. Serious stuff man. m.kzread.info/dash/bejne/nGqdp5hrmtLcfdI.html 👽

when she says "shit ton of articles" she means facebook memes

@robertodegolladojr992

3 жыл бұрын

😂

@zacharychilcott7119

3 жыл бұрын

@Anstapa Solivagus right

@shredvansshredquarters

3 жыл бұрын

@Anstapa Solivagus absolutely right

@theinternetisconfusing5438

3 жыл бұрын

wrong. theyre from Twitter

@nottootrashy3492

3 жыл бұрын

Usually when people say that and say that they don't remember the statistics, it means they didn't read about it at all

I think what happened here is that Joe was trying to discover why she pushes for or against certain changes that include climate change, but she didn't pick up what he was really asking. I think her reasoning is that she is looking at different motivations and causes that come from the people that push to help climate change. She's likely looking at a whole different perspective on why these policies are pushed. It's not necessarily about if it helps the environment or not. Joe is just confused on where her stance is and what she is trying to accomplish and he thinks it's based on climate change itself. That's also why she is confused on what he was trying to get from her. If he got across that he was trying to find her reasoning and motivation for what she does, then they would have gotten further in the conversation.

She has opionion the clinate was different today than it was yesterday whats the issue she isnt wrong

"Theres a big difference between measuring Co2 levels in the atmosphere and deciding whether theres an after life" - Nice work Joe 15:22

"I'm not saying this publically, I'm just talking to you." -Candace Owens on one of the most popular podcasts in the world

@xh0rsex

5 жыл бұрын

@Julie She's not even a bulb. She's like trying to screw a shoe into a light socket...

@teejay3193

5 жыл бұрын

Her point being is that she is respectfully engaging in the topic at hand because its just the 2 of them talking. As in, she means that she isn't trying to persuade anyone whatsoever during this exchange.. Its obvious only Joe Rogan is trying to do the persuading. @JULIE & JAMES! Are you this ignorant? Bc Joe clearly proves he is the one with the agenda by getting upset that she "as an influencer" is stating she doesn't share the same beliefs as him!!

@xh0rsex

5 жыл бұрын

@@teejay3193 It may have been just the 2 of them talking, but it wasn't just the 2 of them listening to the conversation, unless she just drew a blank and forgot that their conversation was being recorded on one of the most listened to podcasts...

@volcryndarkstar3283

5 жыл бұрын

@@teejay3193 Joe's point is that as an influencer she can't just state her feelings as if they're more important than facts because she has a responsibility as a public figure not to misinform people.

@MrArtillian

5 жыл бұрын

@@teejay3193 lol, so you disagree with his point that you shouldn't be opinionated on something you know nothing about? yeah he's the bad guy here.

As CO2 increases in the air plants grow faster and faster. Historically CO2 levels are at a low

"Science has been politicized?" Rogan says as he argues majority rules in science

She flat out admitted she would give two different answers depending on her audience.

@ahmedcruze3532

5 жыл бұрын

Lmao... Fake person alart, even tho she said she's not fake.

@feleciajohnson6086

5 жыл бұрын

She has no credibility now.....

@JBPVFL

5 жыл бұрын

Wait, you can give two different answers, and that could just mean answering differently, not giving opposite answers.

@kensuke0

5 жыл бұрын

@@JBPVFL Different: not the same as another or each other; unlike in nature, form, or quality.

@clinch2clench

5 жыл бұрын

That is the oxford definition, the Webster definition would include "partly unlike" either way her answers would not be opposite. Joe was triggered, he started out by attacking her in a passive aggressive manner for saying "like". It lead to profanity during an assault on her intelligence masked behind an example of "what he would say." i agree with her on most subjects but i still can't stand her , Ann coulter or ben Shapiro.

paraphrased: "It's just you and me talking, I wouldn't say that in the public eye" -Candace Owens on literally the most popular podcast on earth

😂 definitely not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

Owens gives precedence to biased opinion over facts.

“I don’t have an opinion on it.” LITERALLY NEXT SENTENCE “I don’t believe in it”

@Power_Cosmic27

3 жыл бұрын

She was a liberal 3 years ago. She's still in her conservative honeymoon phase, and is paid handsomely to support those views. I doubt she will hold the same views once they find a better shill with a larger reach.

@gamerdude1246

3 жыл бұрын

@@Power_Cosmic27 Like Lauren Southern

@kevinfryar2120

3 жыл бұрын

Its comical! Do you believe in gravity? Science doesn't need your faith.

@nemo2341000

3 жыл бұрын

She's also stated that this isn't a point she's put much research into. I don't think it's fair to call her dumb because she doesn't know much about an issue she hasn't researched much yet. But then has much more informed decisions on a bunch of other topics. So because she doesn't know much about one given topic she stated she hasn't put much research into, she's stupid altogether? I think that's a little unfair of a statement to make. Dumb on this topic, sure. Or at least hasn't really formulated her thoughts about it yet I think the way that you attempt to measure intellect, is dumb in and of itself. It's been 2 years, I'm sure she's had time to formulate her thoughts about the issue. Also if you actually listened to her argument, she stated the does believe in climate change, just not to the extent others do. For instance, I believe the climate changes all the time, I just don't think Humans have much effect on it. I do know we have a certain degree of effect on it, but how much? All of it? Some of it? How much do Humans actually contribute to Climate Change? What can Humans do to stop it? I don't think there's much the U.S. can do to stop Climate change, at least the technology just isn't their yet. Are renewable methods just aren't cost effective enough and aren't that great compared to fossil fuels. Now there is nuclear energy which burn a lot cleaner, but for some reason many don't want to go that route. It would be cost effective, clean, and a better power source. Even if we went back to the stone ages and completely replaced are energy with crappy alternatives that cost more but are cleaner, We still don't know if that would make any significant effect on climate change what so ever. China will continue what they're doing, other impoverished country's will continue to do what they're doing because environmentalism is a luxury of the rich. Those country's could not afford (Neither can we) to change all of are energy sources for crappier alternatives that cost much more and require more maintenance. If some poor family in Zimbabwe have to burn couch chips to keep their family warm, they're going to do it. Regardless if it raises carbon emissions by 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002% in the future. Also, carbon emissions aren't necessarily bad for the planet either and have been around since the earth has been. It has been aiding in plant growth. After multiple studies done, the research shows that Carbon dioxide actually help with plant growth by aiding the photosynthesis process. Carbon Dioxide is actually essential for keeping earth Habitable, But it is a balancing act. Too little and the earth becomes below freezing, too much and the earths temperature can begin to rise. What I generally don't agree with people on is the extent of which we effect it, and the solution for attempting to keep it balanced. I don't believe the technology is quite there yet for us to make much of a change on it as of yet. But there are also many other green house gases that seem to cause this effect as-well such as methane, Chlorofluorocarbons, and nitrous oxide. Also, the changing of the greenhouses effects are hard to predict. So anyone telling you the world is going to end in 2021, is probably an idiot. I don't believe the world is ending any time soon due to this, and I believe the best solution currently is to wait for better technology to become available. I believe there are currently far more pressing concerns than climate change.

@nemo2341000

3 жыл бұрын

@@Power_Cosmic27 You got all that off of a 20 minute clip?

She seems like the kinda person I couldn't spend an hour with.

@keithwrx8

3 жыл бұрын

hour?! more like a few minutes

@ammanchuhan2391

3 жыл бұрын

@@keithwrx8 I stand corrected

@HipixOFFICIAL

3 жыл бұрын

Her and Tomi Lahren both.

@kpllc4209

3 жыл бұрын

Not if she has clothes on.

@ammanchuhan2391

3 жыл бұрын

@@kpllc4209 yooooo. maybe too far