Sometimes his genius is almost frightening.

@nathanfisher5825

3 жыл бұрын

Some say if you listen carefully you can almost hear it

@AmanExplorerBoy

3 жыл бұрын

@@nathanfisher5825 also sometimes it even staggers him

@Kalash74

3 жыл бұрын

they even say it has no bounds

@AhmadullahTanha

3 жыл бұрын

Sometimes his genius is almost bankrupting lol..

@Freudes_06

3 жыл бұрын

some says his genius can generate gravity

Technically all that was emitted was greenhouses gases

@caitthenerd7470

8 жыл бұрын

I see what you did there...

@uvuvwevwevwevossasmaster3819

7 жыл бұрын

CrazyCashGaming thats actually what its called

@caitthenerd7470

7 жыл бұрын

PewdsVlogs Yes, I know. It was amusing though because the gases were emitted from an actual greenhouse.

@bigpat_4295

6 жыл бұрын

Im going to kill myself now i thought ive Seen everything but Oh boi i was wrong

@auzzool

5 жыл бұрын

Grasses*

I love Jeremy's logic

@joshhicks1609

8 жыл бұрын

Glad I'm not alone

@bestduckyrblx2944

8 жыл бұрын

+Austin Rivers It's even more hilarious when he considers it like a great achievement when he says "My genius staggers me" or "What you see here, is the future".

@austinr8501

8 жыл бұрын

BestDucky RBLX so true. But RIP TopGear. It's almost been a year since he was sacked. But hopefully the new Amazon show will be great

@bestduckyrblx2944

8 жыл бұрын

+Austin Rivers Yeah, I have really high hopes on that too.

@callumbowyer5913

8 жыл бұрын

+Austin Rivers what show

'there are no greenhouse gases coming out of the exhaust pipes at all' because they're all coming out of the huge space where there should be a door

@ilibertywalkedmybaconct4445

7 жыл бұрын

Tom Salmon lol

@davidjames3985

6 жыл бұрын

Its a joke...

@Ghost-fe1vp

5 жыл бұрын

@@davidjames3985 so is his comment

@peteryoung8246

5 жыл бұрын

hahahahaha so funny

@JonatasAdoM

5 жыл бұрын

I don't get it.

Jeremy Clarkson's punch line: "What you're looking at now, is the FUTURE." LOL

@Farie977

9 жыл бұрын

Building a electric car "You're seeing the future"

@LattiMonstaaa

9 жыл бұрын

Farie Indriawan Actually electric cars are older than fossil-fuel-powered ones

@TheRamsberg

8 жыл бұрын

+LattiMonstaaa Their older then internal combustion driven vehicles, but not external combustion driven road vehicles, which were often fueled by coal.

@ferasalhati8713

6 жыл бұрын

Allen Parayil how hard can it be?

@billysino

5 жыл бұрын

Still can't beat "I went on the internet this week and I found this"

Every time you invent something the whole world bursts with laughter!

@fbi322

3 жыл бұрын

Im late

@moosicisthegood

3 жыл бұрын

@@fbi322 just a little

@lucasb2884

3 жыл бұрын

@@fbi322 only by 9 years 😂

@fbi322

3 жыл бұрын

@@lucasb2884 im sad bcz actually this girl died

@lucasb2884

3 жыл бұрын

@@fbi322 you mean Sabine?

Jeremy's face at the end is priceless! "I really do think, we're onto something here" *Puppy face*

@Wabajak13

4 жыл бұрын

@Jeremy Brookes because it's pointless?

@7356205

4 жыл бұрын

Jeremy Brookes I never even heard of people complaining about c02 in exhaust before mostly carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide. He acts like there is no emissions coming out of that box.. I don’t believe it I wouldn’t stick my face in there

@jonnyj.

3 жыл бұрын

@@7356205 So you dont believe an actual thousand dollar meter? Nice to know your moronic reasoning skills ;)

@TheKiddingStar

Жыл бұрын

@@7356205 one it's a comedy car show. Two, he said there is no CARBON DIOXIDE. They interchangeably used greenhouse gasses and carbon dioxide but they used the carbon dioxide reading

Is this how the G 65 Amg passed the emissions test?

@thomasmason8481

6 жыл бұрын

No it passed because it isn't classed as a car

@h.0436

6 жыл бұрын

Rodger Johanasberg for real?

@omarhasan2083

6 жыл бұрын

yh, its classed as a cow

@tehgzizlauw1787

5 жыл бұрын

It's classed as a house on wheels

@FarmYardGaming

5 жыл бұрын

Only if Volkswagen have a say.

Somebody should've told him that plants need SUNLIGHT to photosynthesize, which means that roughly the whole of the British Isles are out of the question for this experiment.

@caitthenerd7470

8 жыл бұрын

Sunlight still passes through clouds

@caitthenerd7470

7 жыл бұрын

***** So you are trying to say that when it is cloudy, it's pitch black under the clouds?

@Abo39FooR

7 жыл бұрын

well, the other problem is that in the night it absorbs O2 and gives CO2, right? soooo unless days are more than nights there's no benefit from those plants really.

@fatmikecj

7 жыл бұрын

SONBoomer and it's well known that plants do not grow in the British Isles, the whole place is a barren desert.

@TheMW2informer

5 жыл бұрын

CrazyCashGaming no no no wrong. MAGA

I just KNEW that Jeremy was going to say *"... Is the future..."*

So a box full of rocks can take you from the beginning of a greenhouse with 400.000 tomato plants to the end?

@MsZsc

5 жыл бұрын

Conservation of mass means that the co2 is still just in the rocks, not in the air, so even if you could afford the rocks i don’t think there’s enough in the world lol

@TheBoldImperator

4 жыл бұрын

@@MsZsc Not to mention that the natural weathering of the soda lime (which is an extremely rapid process when not protected from the elements) will just release the carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere.

@DoABarrelRol1l

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheBoldImperator So we'd need a recycling program where we jettison the rocks out into space twice a year?

@supermanraa568

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheBoldImperator Also the fact that the car would be the smallest emitter of CO2 here; they emit nothing compared to the amount released into the atmosphere during manufacturing of the cars and most importantly extraction and transportation of the oil IN those cars. This is why electric cars are much more important; you don't deal with the production of the cars as much but you stop the emissions from oil extraction (which is the largest part) and there's no emissions from the cars.

@supermanraa568

2 жыл бұрын

@Ethan McQue Difference is you have the opportunity with electric cars to generate fuel using renewables. You clearly can't do that with petrol cars. There isn't much waste in power lines because they're run at a very high voltage so a very low current so there's not much heating. Again, with petrol cars, switching to renewables won't help, but using electric cars, you can use renewables and not use power stations in order to make cars run. The entire point is we have to get very close to 100% renewables or we're all dead anyway.

Volkswagen needs this technology... *cough *cough

@eniojaupaj5615

8 жыл бұрын

+Lawrence Wong I'm coughing from the VW emissions...

@keycardgaming9344

8 жыл бұрын

+Lawrence Wong lol I know I have a fit :))

@npn2463

8 жыл бұрын

+Enio Jaupaj LOL

@stensoft

7 жыл бұрын

They didn't have problems with CO₂ but with NOₓ. Which they could easily solve by adding AdBlue that is used by all modern trucks and large cars, including those from VW. Which is actually what they did after this fraud was exposed. The scandal was a massive cock-up of gigantic incompetence.

@grelymolycremp7838

7 жыл бұрын

lol Prius is worst considering you ship the stuff around the world too many times

"It's Top Gear, we've done it!" *CRASH*

better than a prius

@kouroshtashvishi5031

8 жыл бұрын

init

@aaronwilson5956

6 жыл бұрын

How

@caprise-music6722

6 жыл бұрын

The jag is better yes. By better I mean faster and more luggsurius

@advaitvinay7483

6 жыл бұрын

#FasterthanthePRIUS

@aaronwilson5956

5 жыл бұрын

@TheSoulEater121 ?

So, putting potatoes in exhaust pipes isn't a joke, but actually an attempt to reduce CO2 emissions?

@SynchronizorVideos

7 жыл бұрын

Well, given that potatoes up the tailpipe are intended to stop the vehicle from running, of course it reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

@yesno.idontknow.587

5 жыл бұрын

What about banana up a tailpipe

@MickR0sco

4 жыл бұрын

Haha yes. They used air scrubbers in u boat air filters which absorbed CO2. Think they were potassium filters.

@antoy384

4 жыл бұрын

michael ross Unless those rocks have a chemical reaction. Like CO2+2xH20->CH4+2xO2. But that requires energy, a lot. And emits methane.

@VascoCC95

4 жыл бұрын

@@antoy384 Those rocks failed to stop CO emissions and that gas is toxic for humans

Once again, Jeremy's brilliance shines through with a clever, yet still in-development way to do things better.

@theregalproletariat

Жыл бұрын

Well no, because both are solutions to problems that don't need to exist in the first place - internal combustion engines. A much more effective solution is to ditch the engine and make fuel cell (probably hydrogen) cars.

Clarkson for prime minister

@officalsioneadjones3219

6 жыл бұрын

Justro Ling He'd do a better job than the idiot thereas may.

@Jordaaan1

6 жыл бұрын

Not bad

@terrier_productions

5 жыл бұрын

Your profile picture

@HS-PGX

4 жыл бұрын

With Boris Johnson as the PM I can argue as well.

@martingonzalez6915

4 жыл бұрын

No thanks.

Top gear "enviromental ideas" are pure comedy .... but are still far less stupid than what govt officials come up with. :D

@fredsmith9714

7 жыл бұрын

El Shuwix "let's destroy businesses and 10% of the economy because!!! We can reduce emissions almost 1%"

@KretinoSantino

7 жыл бұрын

Cristiano Daniel Hey genius. So a car with 570 Kg battery charged from electricity produced from fossil fuels, helps. Or building wind generators and solar panels with 20 years lifespan and 20 years to achieve energetic return will help :D

@The1993luffy

7 жыл бұрын

El Shuwix Do i really have to explain every detail to you? We need to go away from fossil fuels and invest much more in green energy. I know very well that a car battery isn't "green" but it is better than what we have now. I am confident that someday science will provide us with a better alternative, but we don't have that time, that's why we have to do everything possible. We only have this planet.

@The1993luffy

7 жыл бұрын

El Shuwix Good copy - paste buddy. You still don't seem to understand my point, i'm not only talking about cars or Coalmines, i'm talking about everything, from motorcycles to Nuclear energy. The way we produce energy and consume it. Many things will have to change, i know very well that some alternatives take years to start giving back what they took, others are unstable sources, i know all of that. But we can't just look away, sit and hope some one comes up with a clean energy source that is stable and produces high amounts of energy like a nuclear power plant. We all know something like that probably doesn't even exist, that's why we need to use many types of green energy sources. As i said, we only have 1 planet. Btw, i can have a conversation without insulting other persons, you should try it too. It's not that hard and others would respect you more.

@KretinoSantino

7 жыл бұрын

Cristiano Daniel Thank you for calling me copy/paste buddy. It takes IQ>90 to find out if someone is using copy/paste. You obviously don't have IQ>90. BTW, nice backpaddling skill you have, buddy. You've missed my point by miles. What you call "green sources" are not green sources of energy. Only green energy till this day are hydro-electric power plants. And solar at certain locations. Everything else is waste of resources and does more harm to environment. So does driving electric cars with 500Kg batteries with lifespan of ~10 years.

I had not seen this episode before. The under-engineering of that greenhouse is hysterical!

oh my god! he's invented the catalytic converter!!!!

@VascoCC95

4 жыл бұрын

No, that's an adsorbent. The difference is that the catalytic converter helps some reaction to happen but takes no part in it (so it lasts virtually forever). The adsorbent is like a sponge that accumulates CO2 until it's full and then stops working.

@subashnambiar4651

4 жыл бұрын

@@VascoCC95 you must be really fun at parties

@VascoCC95

4 жыл бұрын

@@subashnambiar4651 geeks also party 🤷🏼‍♂️

@7356205

4 жыл бұрын

Catalytic converter doesn’t do anything to c02 it just burns excess fuel off

@imitt12

3 жыл бұрын

Catalytic converters also don't last forever. They do collect carbon and soot and will eventually plug up.

Genetically modified rocks. Not quite sure that's possible.

@abdulazeezalshareef

6 жыл бұрын

At Top Gear, everything was possible. It was a haven for the dreamers!

@Erowens98

6 жыл бұрын

Technically, it's called artificially engineered.

@ZKichiro

6 жыл бұрын

it would be a BIT of a problem if the rocks in question aren't organic though, now wouldn't it?

@rrrgg2093

6 жыл бұрын

ZKichiro be them at

@sirius4496

5 жыл бұрын

He said wheat not rocks

3:48 "Absolutely no carbon dioxide is coming out of the back of that car." What about the first two tailpipes.

@lenmarfox2947

4 жыл бұрын

Soo all they need is another filter filled with crystals so your doubling all your costs. Sounds like a good plan....not!

@aaronburkeen6409

2 жыл бұрын

He didn't say out of the back of that car. He said that none was coming out of the that specific tailpipe.

4:21 if there was some way to "clean" those "rocks" again, without venting the CO2 to the atmosphere (like extract & crystallize it, or something... somehow), it could maybe eventually be possible (depending on cleaning cost & method)

@tfwmemedumpster

2 жыл бұрын

well you have to put it somewhere. things don't disappear. either release it somewhere, absorb it somewhere or turn it into something else. and in order to turn co2 back into oxygen and carbon you need to put in as much energy as you got out when you burned it. because that's how physics works. the cheapest way to turn co2 into oxygen by far is to use plants. they take up a lot of space but they get all the energy they need from the sun, and they're much more efficient at turning energy into oxygen than a solar panel could be. simply because they build themselves.

@MidshipRunabout2

2 жыл бұрын

We already have something similiar. It's called a catalytic converter and we already use it on all modern cars. Granted it's not completely the same concept and doesnt completely zero the emissions, where this acts more like an absorbent but Cats last much longer and only fail due to heat, vibration or buildup of grime clogging it.

@sebbes333

2 жыл бұрын

@@tfwmemedumpster Maybe you can turn CO2 into something else? Sugar? Plastic? Oil? Carbon? some exotic polymer? etc...

“I really do think that we’re onto something here.” *unconvinced look to camera*

*"sometimes my genius, it's frightening"*

Jeremy Clarkson solved many things

@lizxu322

3 жыл бұрын

It's a shame price and logistics doesn't let it work out in the long run:/

@SugmaNatsu

3 жыл бұрын

@@lizxu322 How long did you scroll through the comments before you found mine?

Its a hippie's dream car, but without marijuana

@stensoft

7 жыл бұрын

You have a point there, hemp can absorb much more CO₂ per plant than tomatoes.

@pug205mardigras

5 жыл бұрын

Hippies can’t say anything driving round in their polluting old Volkswagen campervans the crap they belch out is far worse than anything modern

@VascoCC95

4 жыл бұрын

So what we reached here is that the hippy dream is a VW van with a marijuana greenhouse over the roof fed with the exhaust pipes. Top Gear pumping up responsible cultural development!

@7356205

4 жыл бұрын

The hippy already has the marijuana

You are so brilliant Jeremy ~ just love watching and listening to YOU! My grandkids Dad is from beautiful Cornwall 🌊

If this actually worked he would win a nobel prize xD.

@hilmannajib

4 жыл бұрын

@Jeremy Brookes because lime stone is not renewable material,

@simeonmihaylov6123

4 жыл бұрын

Just imagine reading in the newspapers: And the new Nobel Prize goes for......The Jezza....

@akmedia8206

4 жыл бұрын

TOUGH MAN RANDY SAVAGE well no because the solution is literally just electric cars they are 0 emission

@7356205

4 жыл бұрын

Nah they would just put a hit on him before his ideas get out

@7356205

4 жыл бұрын

AK Media not really. In America really high percentage of our electricity comes from burning fossil fuels. No emissions? Emissions are the result of making electricity in United States

Clarkson’s second solution is actually quite admirable but still one of the least effective CO2 solutions ever

gotta love the way he says tube! 0:30

Wow! Jeremy is amazing. He managed to find another solution even if his first trick didn't work!

@adamwolfe2848

3 жыл бұрын

yes

Interesting idea, I think this is something I wanna look into lol. Pitch it to my engineering friends and see what they think

Full praise to Clarkson for having the guts to demonstrate the problems and reality of carbon fixation, or attempting zero emissions.

@dougalbadger4918

4 жыл бұрын

Dave Smith better to try than to die

@fearofchicke

4 жыл бұрын

Dougal Badger but the only thing you’re trying to do is slow it. Not to revers it, nor to stop it; and that’s just called futility.

@skatterpro

4 жыл бұрын

@@fearofchicke What a bunch of pseudointellectual drivel. The world is putting in astronomical resources to reverse it, tree planting, bio-engineered algae, pure carbon dumps, but if we keep pumping the shit out at this rate, there is simply no way for it to get handled no matter how efficient. The best thing we could do for the environment with our current needs is nuclear power, and to some degree a shift to electric vehicles.

@tomvarga5515

3 жыл бұрын

I recon green hydrogen will be the new standard for long range vehicles, while traditional lithium batteries will be popular in small city cars. All that is meaningless though without renewables or nuclear to produce electricity.

Such modern engenuity. A world saving invention!!

This is actually genius, seriously. Sure, might be stupid at first, but this is actually a straight-forward concept

one step at a time jeremy, one step at a time.

I'm surprised the government hasn't taken this down. lol

No, the driving process for the Atlantic convyer is wind blowing from the tropics to the UK/Europe. Deforestation in the tropics may upset the wind patterns and /or intensity which will have an effect on the speed and possibly direction of the wind.

Lol at the face he made at the end "I really think, that we're on to something here"

To be fair he was heading in the right direction. It may have been a bit too small for the job but it was logical

Jeremy: This is the future Me: It wasn't the future

3:45 If this episode was filmed more recently though I guess we might been asking if it's because the exhaust pipe that the filter is connected to is fake

awww i love his face at the very end!

"the future"... yep... I can totally see every single car on the road towing a massive trailer with flowers in it.....

I was waiting for Jeremy to say something like the right exhaust pipe is a fake one...

@Joelpreeth

4 жыл бұрын

So was I...

seems like it would just release the co2 in a different spot than the exhaust would have originally. {lightbulb}but if it collected in a canister and be reused still creates the same problem i mentioned but its used for a purpose

The face at the end got me 😂😂😂

how many times has jeremy said "What you're looking at, ladies and gentlemen, is the future!"

This man literally deserves a noble peace prize

For that I would've used a hybrid of a cactus (so that you barely have to maintain it and it can take a lot of sun) and something else that converts a lot of CO2 to Oxygen.. Cacti also continue to absorb CO2 at night so by the morning, your car would be ready to go again completely.

@siimp2 Yeah you could be right about that not sure how the exhaust in the jag is hooked up, also if you look at the right hand exhaust once the car has been fired up it seems to smoke quite a lot maybe its delivering the exhaust emission load from its own pipe plus the load that the other pipe is supposed to be emitting. this should have been done on a car with a single exhaust!

Mission Failed : Greenhouse Smashed Out

@VascoCC95

4 жыл бұрын

They smashed the greenhouse effect!

Imagine if Clarkson just turned off the car and showed his back up plan

I find a jeremy to be so Intelligent ~ Just love watching and listening to him✅✅✅

2:00 when Hammond says we have work this out.... what he means is James has worked this out hahaha

@VascoCC95

4 жыл бұрын

They are a team against Clarkson's stupid idea

As a kid I genuinely thought the whole idea would work out I'm gonna try it

@7356205

4 жыл бұрын

What about carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide which is 300x worse than carbon dioxide? The plants wouldn’t last a day haha

@FarmYardGaming

4 жыл бұрын

@@7356205 Ah, dammit. Okay best to leave it as a dream I guess

“Sometimes my genius is… it’s almost frightening..!”

This whole video answers the question i always had as a kid when i found out that cars emit CO2 and plants need CO2. Thanks mate XD Also those crystals are pretty cool

Just briliant

If some people would work on that... This could be it

Sometimes if you listen closely you can actually hear my genius

3:26 Jeremy's sound lmao

It's funny how jermy puts his silly ideas into practice and be so confident about it.😂😂😂

There's no carbon because the filter is so dense the air is barely going through and taking the path of least resistance i.e. the other exhaust

i actually do think he is on to something... needs a lot more work but it is interesting

@VascoCC95

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting idea for the roof of the car though

@Person01234

3 жыл бұрын

Towing the weight of the greenhouse and the vegetables (or carrying if mounted on top) would burn more fuel than it would ever offset. If this was a normal greenhouse in his garden it would absorb just as much CO2 but wouldn't cause the vehicle to emit more. So no, he's not on to anything.

@leotatusko1654

3 жыл бұрын

Person Oisels I think he referring to the rocks not the greenhouse.

Nice explanation :) It makes perfect sense :)

Lol dude I've never seen this show outside of KZread clips... But I love it.

Leave it to Jeremy to come up with something superbly ambitious which blows up in its face

R.i.p tomatos

His genius has staggered me!

@bayarm9 I think there will be charging stations all over the roads because we can't depend only to charge it at homes only but the big problem is if any one go off road or in the desert then he will have to cry beside it or use solar energy converter :D

Whats better to get for a family and luxury, a 2015 Jaguar x5 or a Maserati Ghibli

@tsuikyit5511

7 жыл бұрын

Jaguars are real good

@bearz6606

7 жыл бұрын

I would agree but the maserati ghibli really stands out

@iSkully99

7 жыл бұрын

Honestly, they are very similar cars with similar roles. Just pick the one you like the most. I'd personally go for the Maserati because of the engine sound but the Jaguar is of course great as well.

@MrSpeedy99

7 жыл бұрын

Ghibli- It'll stand out against the jag

This gave me a great idea, stuff tomato’s in my exaust

I think what they're onto is the fact that matter is matter and can be changed from anything to anything.

This reminds me of something I'd think up in the middle of the night as a kid

Technically, in order to make those crystals you have to extract CO2 fromthem and then it is released

What a pillock! haha

greta would love this ideas

Super idea by Sir Jimmy

4:15 Jeremy: "All is coming out of this tailpipe is nitrogen and oxigen, which is..." James: "*Æ*"

Plants take in carbon dioxide not carbon monoxide

@7356205

4 жыл бұрын

Connor Mcgee they just got into the atmosphere the car doesn’t burn it all

@Hulowski particulates are hydrocarbons and are made from car engines though

Oh Jezza, never change ^^

Science geeks, please bear with me, and tell me if this 14 year old brain has figured something out... Through a process called electrolysis (where electricity gets run through water), water will split into its components, Hydrogen gas and Oxygen gas, both of which are highly flammable and can power engines. So my idea is that you fill your engine with water, its uses the car battery to electrolyse the water, the engine will seperate the H2 and O2 gases and burn them to power the car. No carbon involved, no fuel involved, and it'll probably be more powerful

@LDK447

10 жыл бұрын

Or the H2 and O2 gases can be burnt together to power the car, and create water again, so it can be electrolysed and burnt again. Mind you, im grade 9, tell me if this is plain stupid

@blackm4niac

10 жыл бұрын

LDK447 well, that is the basic idea of the fuel cell. But it doesn't work with combustion but rather electron transfer between the H2 and the O2 to turn them into ions and then they combine into water. This generates electricity which can be used to power a car. It's been known for quite a while. So why isn't this used more widespread? Simple. The electrodes have to be made out of platinum, otherwise the whole process just won't happen. And since platinum is pretty much one of the rarest and most expenisve substances in the world, you can't really mass produce fuel cells.

@bradleylong3230

10 жыл бұрын

This idea is impossible. Hydrogen isn't combustible on its own, and neither is oxygen. Both require each other to function in a combustion reaction, but there is a secondary issue. Hydrogen-Oxygen combustion occurs much faster, and will cause engine damage. Electrolysis is also massively inefficient, and requires approximately 50 kWh for each kg of hydrogen gas. This process is a redox reaction, and the issue lies in the fact that it takes more energy to separate the hydrogen and oxygen from each other than you can retrieve through combustion or through a hydrogen cell. Hydrogen carries its energy in its potential to bond with other molecules, and this means that you lose about half your power input between separating the water and utilizing it in an engine. In short, shit doesn't work as well as it could. I just gave a presentation on this for my honors chem class, so its still burned in my mind.

@smolkafilip

10 жыл бұрын

Wont work. Breaking down water takes 280kJ/mol and ideal combustion would produce... again 280kJ/mol. Most of that will be lost in the form of heat. Even if you had strong enough battery you would essentialy make an incredibly inefficient electromobile but instead of using electricity directly to power the car (which is by itself a sucky idea for numerous reasons) you would make an electromobile with 30% range.

@jakesaddo

9 жыл бұрын

They turned away from that idea due to it being incredibly dangerous (Hydrogen and Oxygen=flammable, if ignited=big BOOM)

Now WE have 2019 and we need this more then ever 😂😂😂😂😂

truly groundbreaking

at 4:01; is that Angela Martin from The Office???

Essentially they made a "natural" catalytic converter

If it shuts up the hippies...go for it

@christinepat9784

10 жыл бұрын

year

@daltonbednar8150

10 жыл бұрын

Domenico Guerra Unfortunately... It's expensive. I'm not going to do the exact research, I'm just tossing out numbers from memory, so pardon the inaccuracy, but a certain Tesla (may not be the model S) gets up to a 214 mile range (It may also be highway, not city). That's incredible! It cost $80,000 though. A $12,000 Smart car gets 70. A lead acid scooter that cost dirt can get 70. A $16,000 Zero motorcycle can get 160/100 range city/highway. Look up the Ryden dual carbon battery, it is near the same energy density, might even be slightly higher, but recharges 20 times faster.

@thedon008

9 жыл бұрын

***** And in 10 years, electric cars will be the way to go for anybody that doesn't care about the sound of an engine. They won't be stuck at 200 mile ranges.

@SnownelVEVO

9 жыл бұрын

thedon008 RAV4 is the second longest range (Tesla being the first) at 100 miles for $50k. Behind that, most everything is around 80 miles. So, right now, electric cars are essentially stuck at 80 miles (the RAV4 is only higher because it can fit more batteries). Maybe they will hit an average of 200 miles in 10 years, which will be nice, but there are tons of cars right now with 500+ mile ranges, and those 200+ miler electrics won't be within the common consumer's price range.

@thedon008

9 жыл бұрын

***** It won't be that way. They have already been researching better ways to do it because car manufacturers know this is how it will go. Of course Nissans and BMWs and Toyotas don't have the range the Tesla has cause they were just little projects for them, not their livelihood. Tesla will probably make the most advancements and they already give their patents for free for others to develop upon.

Good idea

James makes me always remember Cliff williams from ACDC

Its MONoxide that we have to worry about. DiOxide is what we breath out and yes cars do produce it as well. Those plants would die in about 6 hours.

@SakiDG

6 жыл бұрын

ZeosPantera oh hey, it's Z! :)

@lloydevans2900

6 жыл бұрын

It's certainly true that humans have to worry about carbon monoxide (CO), since that binds irreversibly to our haemogoblins and kills us. But plants aren't affected in the same way - CO is toxic to them yes, but it takes far higher concentrations of it to poison them. Which a properly maintained car engine shouldn't be producing anyway.

Elon Musk was one of the audience and he made Tesla

You are a BRILLIANT man Jeremy!

problem with the last idea is you would need two houses one on eah exhaust, coz remember theres still 15 percent carbon dioxide coming out the the exhaust he tested first before he took the prong out,

This would work on a 0.00002cc engine

@VascoCC95

4 жыл бұрын

Prius? Is it you?

Why are we not funding this? Scientist still baffled

Even a casual glimpse at the left hand set of pipes indicates that the gasses from the set on the right would expand the plastic pipes noticeably. They don't even flutter, as they would if they were having to cope with the impulses of a running engine. This wouldn't be the first gag they engineered to arrive at a result that would back their silliness.

i love jeremy’s top gear