the world: sooo..... what’s this? japan: umm... it’s a multi-purpose destroyer

@stormtrooperanimations3241

3 жыл бұрын

Lol🤣🤣

@doubledekercouch

3 жыл бұрын

Multi purpose = we launch helicopter *AND* jet fighters

@haihengh

3 жыл бұрын

no, all Japanese ships are called frigates, their name suggested 護衛艦, so yes, their official name is helicopter frigate, or maybe jet frigate, but they will not say it's a destroyer or carrier.

@wiffy1346

3 жыл бұрын

@Hai Huang goei kan are all translated destroyer by THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT and match the size of a destroyer, except for those izumo, hyuga, and the new mogami although the name “multi-purpose destroyer” doesn’t appear on the papers and news now (maybe they changed it?), they called the izumo by that name when they decided to refit

@stormtrooperanimations3241

3 жыл бұрын

@@haihengh Japanese NOT allowed to have carriers. So their helicopter carriers was a multi purpose desrroyer. The Izumo's class was "Izumo-class multi-purpose destroyer". Thats why Izumo registration was "22DDH". 22 stands for the ship numbers, DDH stands for "DD"= "Destroyer", And "H"= "Helicopter carrying"

China: What's that? An aircraft carrier? Japan: Of course, no! It's our new international airport

@deadandbored

2 жыл бұрын

"amphibious assault vessel" that just happens to carry F-35s

@ikedakazuto5061

2 жыл бұрын

Lol it’s called the “Multi-Purpose Destroyer”

@sakura_szma

2 жыл бұрын

lol

@abolakeshowmustafa4279

2 жыл бұрын

Nah, Its a duck! L🤣l

@michiganrailfan2141

Жыл бұрын

@@deadandbored I mean when you look at it, it's basically the same as the US Navy's Wasp, Tarawa or America Class Amphibious Assault Ships.

Everyone gangsta until the Kido Butai is back

@rahmansetiawan6052

3 жыл бұрын

nah, need to add a pair of kirov sized battlecruiser called yamato and musashi with brutal ground attack capability to be called kido butai

@thanakonpraepanich4284

3 жыл бұрын

Still need cruiser escorts and top notch destroyers to go with them. How long before Atago, Haguro, Maya, Choukai and Aoba come back and rejoin the band?

@peteford7258

3 жыл бұрын

@@thanakonpraepanich4284 Japan has 8 large Aegis DDGs that are so large most countries would consider them CGs. And they are named similar to WW2 Japanese BBs and CAs.

@laffey.chan_

3 жыл бұрын

Now wait for pearl harbor visits

@cheng3580

3 жыл бұрын

@@thanakonpraepanich4284 Atago is already back though. They still use alot of those names on alot of modern ships.

Both Japan and UK are working on new air to air missile for F35b 🇬🇧🤝🇯🇵

@robbillington1982

3 жыл бұрын

And the tempest!

@christianwhittall5889

3 жыл бұрын

@@robbillington1982 I’m not sure if JP is working on that but I believe they’d be a good addition to it

@alanhenderson6497

3 жыл бұрын

Already made a new air to air missile; it’s called the MBDA Meteor and is one of the most advanced missiles in the world being a BVR missile capable of Mach 4.5

@robharris8844U

3 жыл бұрын

@@alanhenderson6497 true, but we are working on another with Japan- not sure of the specification as secret but either longer range or hypersonic for the f35b

@alanhenderson6497

3 жыл бұрын

@@robharris8844U No we’re not. The F35B will be integrating Meteor as its main weapon which will be the mainstay of capability (from 2024) until circa 2050. Japan might buy the Meteor but there is no plan to build a new air to air missile currently.

Great to see these modifications come into fruition and bless all who serve on the “JS Izumo”& “JS Kaga”, regards from the UK

@user-ro8gi2vm6i

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you fromp Japan

@knoahbody69

2 жыл бұрын

The QE and the Prince of Wales are essentially the same type of ship as the Kaga.

China: Um, whatcha got there Japan? Japan: A multi-purpose destroyer China: But it can carry F-35s Japan: IT'S A DESTROYER

@MikaHolic_Channel_OFFICIAL

3 жыл бұрын

China: b-but it has a flat dec-- Japan: *ITS A FAQING DESTROYER*

@dredgewalker

3 жыл бұрын

It is a destroyer as the F35 does destroy its targets lol

@DracoWings

2 жыл бұрын

China: It's a fucking aircraft carrier! Japan: No, it's the mobile casino for our troop, just like yours.

@mitchi8638

2 жыл бұрын

lol

@ggurwlcom420

2 жыл бұрын

@@DracoWings just says it's a hotel like Yamato.

Great to see Japan getting back stronger they really do have some great engineers

@goodputin4324

3 жыл бұрын

Lol they were never weak.

@jamisonguitar3370

2 жыл бұрын

@@goodputin4324 fair enough

@fuehrer_tb5597

2 жыл бұрын

Yups they just holding back all this time 😉

@criostoirashtin11

2 жыл бұрын

They've always been strong, huge military budget

@Wilsonl77

Жыл бұрын

Americans forgot what happened in Pearl Harbour

Everybody: this is an Aircraft Carrier Japan: no no no no, it looks like one but actually no

@invertedv12powerhouse77

3 жыл бұрын

Smaller carriers like this are called assault ships in the US so imagine lol

@GrayWolf-pv5uj

2 жыл бұрын

@@invertedv12powerhouse77 Yeah, and the Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov is actually a “cruiser”. Warships are interesting:)

@knoahbody69

2 жыл бұрын

@@invertedv12powerhouse77 It can do that too.

@keithmoriyama5421

2 жыл бұрын

Seems to me Japan kind of fibbed the last time they were in the warship making business.

@honhon999

2 жыл бұрын

@@invertedv12powerhouse77 Hey, Don't touch that, it's sensitive.

i'm very glad to see the Japanese Self Defense Force getting this capability. It adds another layer of flexibility in the pacific.

@wei270

2 жыл бұрын

they have this capability long ago, just a matter of restriction place on them.

@NarasimhaDiyasena

2 жыл бұрын

wei the restriction was pretty shitty, especially since one wasn’t placed in Germany

@wei270

2 жыл бұрын

@@NarasimhaDiyasena it really was, and it at least should have had a time limit, place a unlimited military ban on a country is just asking for future trouble.

@andrewelam4124

2 жыл бұрын

@@NarasimhaDiyasena There was a military ban placed in Germany. It was called “The Treaty of Versailles”, which resulted in Nazi Germany. Yeah, prohibitive military restrictions on any country never ends well.

@cosmoray9750

Жыл бұрын

Unit 731

Good to see a Japanese carrier again , best wishes to japan from uk 🇬🇧 🇯🇵 we both have carriers again

As a Japanese citizen, with the cooperation of the US Marine Corps, I am very happy that our Maritime Self-Defense Force's "JS escort ship Izumo=出雲" (DDH-183) succeeded in launching and arriving at the first F35 fighter after the war. I am deeply grateful. thank you! I am deeply impressed that Japan has finally come to this point for the first time in 75 years. I can't rely on the US military forever without an aircraft carrier! Let's make it possible for us to manage it to some extent. It is based on the idea. The "JS escort ship Kaga=加賀" (DDH-184) will also be improved so that it will be able to launch and land F35 fighters, such as heat-resistant specifications, by the same three years.

@cesaravegah3787

Жыл бұрын

And the democratic nations of the earth are more than happy that have you as our allies.

@alharrison1038

Жыл бұрын

@@cesaravegah3787 I second that. A greatest of ally to have on our side.

@jackdaniel7465

Жыл бұрын

As an American, I am impressed and happy to see this, now Japan needs to build a few more!!

@jackdaniel7465

Жыл бұрын

Name them the KAGA, AKAGI, HIRYU, SORYU.

@cosmoray9750

Жыл бұрын

Unit 731

海外の皆様が、日本の駆逐艦にとても興味を持っていることに、正直驚いています。

@Camo-Rabbit

2 жыл бұрын

@ずい さん 「護衛艦」が正式な呼称なのは存じています。 ただ、海外の方の動画であったため、私のコメントを翻訳したときに「Escort ship」と誤訳されてしまうかもと考えたため、あえて「駆逐艦」という言葉を使用しました。

World: "That's a carrier tho..." Japan: "We prefer destroyer with benefits!"

@Brtt4849

2 жыл бұрын

Helicopter frigate 😩

USS Enterprice be like:After 70 years so you are back now kaga kaga:i still waiting for akagi-nee

@galihpambudi1494

2 жыл бұрын

I dont know why, but... why i was imagine Azur Lane in this dialogue?

@lyrahutchinson529

2 жыл бұрын

Yea, im waiting for Akagi too, also Shinano as well...

@ISD_Nemesis

2 жыл бұрын

I am waiting for shinano.

@fitt4393

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao 😂

@honhon999

2 жыл бұрын

@@ISD_Nemesis Unfortunately, Shinano was unlucky ship, Shoukaku and Zuikaku, this type is best.

China "That's an Aircraft Carrier!!" Japan "no" *hangs up glitterball* "mobile disco"

@Matixmer

2 жыл бұрын

This would be exactly the kind of bs China is pulling constantly. Precisely what they deserve.

@pitmatix1457

2 жыл бұрын

@@Matixmer Absolutely agree.

@OperationEndGame

2 жыл бұрын

It’s a party bus👍

I'm a South Korean and I welcome Japan rebuilding it's navy with aircraft carriers. Now, China is our common threat concerning it's unlimited armament and ambition to invade East Asia with it's might. UK burnt down Washington in 1850, but only in about six decades, US became UK's biggest ally to fight against their common enenemies. What's past is past. Bad Japan lost WWII and it now is a good member of democracy along with South Korea. International relationship has to be based off of the present and future matters.

@maincoon6602

2 жыл бұрын

You said it perfectly. I agree with you 💯%.👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

@RN-rl2du

2 жыл бұрын

As a Japanese we are happy to be your ally

@maincoon6602

2 жыл бұрын

@@RN-rl2du As an American we are happy to be both your allies.

@ret7army

2 жыл бұрын

well said

@maincoon6602

2 жыл бұрын

A very wise statement👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻. From Washington state, USA.

Japan Has Potential To Develop Full Fledge Aircraft Carriers !!!

@luxeternity

3 жыл бұрын

Sure ..but abolish article 9 first then we talk

@akshaygade8758

3 жыл бұрын

@@luxeternity First Remove Your Fear Then We Will Talk !

@bearsagainstevil

3 жыл бұрын

The west isn't scared that Japan is a danger to world peace, so I doubt we would mind if Japan had aircraft carriers . Japan is very different to 1940s Japan much like modern Germany isn't ww2 Germany .

@akshaygade8758

3 жыл бұрын

@@bearsagainstevil Yeah, Japan Has Much Mature Policy Then Its Past, If They Make Any Aircraft Carriers Then They Are For Their Own Defence Not For Attacking Or Land Capturing Purpose !!!

@jayedarc9110

2 жыл бұрын

And Gundams

Japan is capable to protect south china sea with these two giants 👍👍. Love and respect from India.

@thanakonpraepanich4284

3 жыл бұрын

Who do I have a hunch Indian Army will need to march to Myanmar to fight off the Chinese, to protect India from land invasion, with sky over Bihar and Uttra Pradesh being contested by both air forces until the armistice?

@_UCS_SwapnilSahaiSrivastav

3 жыл бұрын

@@thanakonpraepanich4284 lmao..... that's not gonna happen till the next century. What may happen is a contested airspace in Xinjiang and Tibet

@josephstalin9604

3 жыл бұрын

@@thanakonpraepanich4284 what the hell are you speaking bot? No one is understanding you.

@chynesevirus2968

3 жыл бұрын

@Simon Whittaker Stfu WU Mao with a fake Western Name

@genesis1765

2 жыл бұрын

India doesn't anyone they control the top of the Malacca straits virtually every ship going to China has to go through the straits at the nicobar Islands. Jokingly if Taiwan and India wanted to they could have China on there knees in a month

smart transformation from Japanese vessel, financially clever. Welcome in the club From Corsica 🇫🇷

@jameshailerthepostmaster4389

3 жыл бұрын

Any News from Corsica, Like Someone Wanting to be an Emperor. If there is, I will fly to Corsica and Support him

@Mn12074

3 жыл бұрын

@@jameshailerthepostmaster4389 lol

@smg7386

3 жыл бұрын

Not for an autodefense navy. Aircraft carriers are made to project force outside their frontiers

@jamesb4789

3 жыл бұрын

You mean welcome back to the club. Japan, UK, and USA are the only navies that fought carrier warfare.

@_UCS_SwapnilSahaiSrivastav

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesb4789 yel they are the OGs

Let's be honest, this vessel was never a destroyer! This refit makes perfect sense for Japan.

@alfonsorodriguez6437

3 жыл бұрын

The "destroyer" designation is for pure political reasons. The Japanese constitution only allows a self defense force so calling it an aircraft carrier shows an aggressive stance. So what's in a name or in this case a designation? They can use the destroyer in whatever capacity or make whatever alterations to the ship and get by the Japanese Constitution. In the future they should build a real carrier on the 60K ton class, they are going to need against China and I bet they will still call it something else other than an Aircraft Carrier unless their constitution is change in this respect. WW2 is already 75 year old and Japanese politician should take a more aggressive position towards China which is only thing the Chinese Communist Party understands.

@rahmansetiawan6052

3 жыл бұрын

kuznetsov officially is a cruiser 😁

@peteford7258

3 жыл бұрын

@@alfonsorodriguez6437 Like Rahman says, Japan can do what Russia does. Aircraft carrying heavy cruiser.

@PW060284

3 жыл бұрын

@@alfonsorodriguez6437 if you're gonna play such shenanigans and no other country cares, just rewrite the damn constitution. Anything can be claimed as "for defense reasons", nukes included

@leefithian3704

3 жыл бұрын

Quit calling it a carrier , it is an anti winterized Wuhan bat device ,

It's very important for Japan to protect japan sea territories against communist PLA. 👍🏻 Love from Malaysia ♥️🇲🇾🇯🇵

@jonsong4592

3 жыл бұрын

i mean, the reason why japan isn't allowed to have carriers is that it is considered an offensive weapon. Carriers are used to exert military power overseas, which is why USA has a whole bunch of them so she can deploy air power across the globe. Carriers are basically range extensions for a nations air power. You don't need to extend the range of your air power for defensive reasons, as land based airfields are far more efficient at doing this. I'm 100% sure that aircraft used by Japan has enough range to cover the entirety of Japanese waters to combat any foreign aggression. This is just another case of the worlds superpowers pretending not to see something. Helicopter carriers dont count, because they are considered to be mainly defensive. Modifying the carriers to be able to launch F35s is definitely a breach of article 9 in the Japanese constitution. Honestly, at this point they might as well just publicly renounce the clause that renounces Japan's rights belligerency. Then again, in 2014 Abe did pretty much tear up the provision in all but name so might as well go all the way.

@kumaragurunadaraja2928

3 жыл бұрын

@@jonsong4592 good explanation. Based on my understanding, Japan still need a aircraft carrier because when your enemy take offensive, u will go defensive only izit? The only way to stop them is when you are capable enough to go offensive also. I don't think Japan have any foreign threats now. Japan enemy is just beside them in South china sea.. 👍🏻

@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723

2 жыл бұрын

hM,......then German Navy should name and repaint one of their heavy destroyers missiles cruisers Prinz Eugen & Admiral Graf Spee,

The imperial Japanese navy is on the return 💪 let’s get some work done together🌹🇬🇧🤝🇯🇵🌹

@eoky

2 жыл бұрын

Return to kill brutally murder millions of Chinese and Asians just like WW2? We can forgive but we don't forget.

@canzukcommonwealth7309

2 жыл бұрын

@@eoky you mean like what the Chinese are doing to Muslims? In today’s age? Unlike what you mention was done by a different generation, and time where also different. But it’s okay because China is doing it also killing her own people! Shut up and sit down.

@jianyang6281

2 жыл бұрын

@@canzukcommonwealth7309 China is not killing muslims, Chinese muslims have better lives than anyother place, especialy compares to USA muslims.

@canzukcommonwealth7309

2 жыл бұрын

@@jianyang6281 so the world is lying and China’s mouth piece the global times is right 😂 explain why China has sanctions against her if she is violating human rights?

@friedrichkoenig3901

2 жыл бұрын

don't act like a champion of the Muslims will you? you know your country has been killing Muslims as always

Japan are capable of doing anything, they are true warriors.

Can't wait for Japan to regain it's lost Navy.

@HoshikawaHikari

3 жыл бұрын

New and updated Yamato in the works behind bamboo fences maybe~ XD

@ross8474

2 жыл бұрын

What in the bad days

@ross8474

2 жыл бұрын

Are they going to get them from the sea bed

@jamesgellert1263

2 жыл бұрын

@@ross8474 stop living in the pass war is ever closer in the present.

@wei270

2 жыл бұрын

@@HoshikawaHikari yeah they can disguise its contraction as a new sea side hotel.

Goood luck japan 🇯🇵 ....The land of rising Sun ....... ..... Greetings from India 🇮🇳

@shaung8182

Ай бұрын

Hi brother I'm happy to see india getting stronger!! With their carrier group! From Shaun of uk

beautiful clean engineering. Made in Japan. Even the sheet metal joinery is witthout bends and defects.Pure engineering marvel.

Good luck.🇯🇵hope our Canberra class get f35b soon🇭🇲

@robharris8844U

3 жыл бұрын

I thought Australia was going for the F35c version?

@fatdoi003

3 жыл бұрын

@@robharris8844U no catobar installed, only stovl option available..... also the deck wasn't spec to handle the heat from the jet blast

@robharris8844U

3 жыл бұрын

@@fatdoi003 oh right ,they were saying they were going for the C version, must have changed minds. With the F35b you can treat the surface for landing with a special coating as on the RN HMS Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales aircraft carriers. If Australia goes in for the F35b they will be able to use those carriers in Pacific and SCS.(Also, they will be able to use the Italian and Japan carriers as they are equipped for F35b aswell.👍🇬🇧🇦🇺

@RJM1011

3 жыл бұрын

Yes would be great Spain is already flying it's Harriers they have from the same ships.

@shade9272

3 жыл бұрын

Why? It's an overpriced lemon. It only has one niche role that it's ostensibly good at, and that's as a tactical strike platform with a limited payload. Better off leaving the Canberra class as it is. At least it is useful that way.

Looks great. Greetings from UK 🇬🇧

@Wottan007

3 жыл бұрын

Am not sure you would have said the same 80 years ago... The man is devil one day and angel the following day....

@5000mahmud

3 жыл бұрын

@@Wottan007 times change

@Wottan007

3 жыл бұрын

@@5000mahmud : Man does not change....always stupid !

@eoky

2 жыл бұрын

To sink another British warship just like 1942? 😅

@B-A-L

2 жыл бұрын

So what about the Germans or the French or the Americans?

Japan: It's a destroyer carrier *wink *wink Everyone except CCP and NK: Yes, ofc *wink *wink

@knightrider1877

2 жыл бұрын

LOL LOL *wink *wink *hai *hai Japan: Korega Wata Si no Desu.... World to Xina: Achtung! Achtung!...........

@Bakotcha

2 жыл бұрын

@@knightrider1877 uhh... ???

@user-lt5zz8gv3q

2 жыл бұрын

because we suffered a lot, this is not funny.

@Bakotcha

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-lt5zz8gv3q dayum bro chill

@tailback08

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-lt5zz8gv3q who is "we"?

with the looming conflict on both sides it's great to see that the former axis powers are now on the same side with the one they fought before... i'm pretty sure they learned their lesson the hard way.

Very Nice love Japan ❤ from U.S.

China: This is a casino ship, I swear. Japan: This is helicopter destroyer, I swear. Right.

@TheBelrick

2 жыл бұрын

Really highlights two takeaways. 1. Laws are worthless words on paper. 2. Official news is just ruling party propaganda.

@nickthenuker7916

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheBelrick 3. Point 2 applies wether you’re a democratic nation or an authoritarian one

australia needs to do this, and make more lhds, so we can also deploy f35 b

@RJM1011

3 жыл бұрын

Yes Spain is already doing it with the same ships using the Harriers they have left.

@jamesb4789

3 жыл бұрын

Thus the Australian Navy is now actively looking at the QE. Why do you think the RN sent it to the Pacific? Sales works best in person. India is also looking at two of the QE modified to catapult operation.

@RJM1011

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesb4789 Catapult would be CRAP for the UK and is CRAP

@redback1711

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesb4789 really? I have not heard about that, hopefully the Australian government is conidering it, our navy needs bigger teeth lol

@paulboger7377

3 жыл бұрын

RAN needs to build another Canberra class for total air operations only, not a hybrid.

Finally Japan got an air carrier. Considering his location Japan should build at lest two more air carrier. Greetings from Italy 🇮🇹

@gojiraaa8208

3 жыл бұрын

Not "finally". Japan already had 4 and maybe more aircraft carriers in WWII.

@marcovitali3833

3 жыл бұрын

@@gojiraaa8208 the all world know that. I mean nowadays after more than 70 years from the end of WWII.

@sushiawoo5446

3 жыл бұрын

@@marcovitali3833 Well technically, this is still not an aircraft carrier. Due to constitutional restrictions, almost all ships in the modern Japanese Navy are called "Goei-kan/護衛艦" (escort ships), not aircraft carriers or even destroyers. But, of course in reality, it's an aircraft carrier tho lol

@gojiraaa8208

3 жыл бұрын

@@marcovitali3833 which one you love more? Spegheti, fetucini, macaroni, or pasta?

@gojiraaa8208

3 жыл бұрын

@Narrator Meme just to know what native italian like you love most.

Kido Butai rides again. Awesome. Japan, USA, and Vietnam together. Life is getting serious again. There is always another war brewing, hopefully all the world players take a deep breath and take a step back.

@janusjones6519

3 жыл бұрын

Wtf why is vietnam in this comment Lol

@steviedfromtheflyovercount4739

3 жыл бұрын

@@janusjones6519 Japan, as well as Vietnam, are former enemies. Now, Allies in a possible war. Plus, China trying to claim a good chunk of South China Sea to exploit the natural resources (fish and oil), so Vietnam and all the adjacent countries are gearing up their diplomatic pressure and preparing their military. Also, read last week that India now has 200,000 soldiers on their border with China.. France also sent a warship.

@steviedfromtheflyovercount4739

3 жыл бұрын

@Raider Primus Thank you for your comment. Agree Vietnamese military is fearsome. In this situation, Vietnam could use more Allies with more Carriers.

Greetings from Japan. Many people have a misconception about Japanese "destroyer", but the Japanese government and JMSDF do not classify these ships as destroyers. Almost all JMSDF naval combat ships are called "goeikan". This word literally means "escort ship" but the nuance is closer to "combat ship". However, for some reason, "Goeikan" is translated as ”destroyer” on English web like wikipedia. This is probably because the ship numbers of these are DD-XX. Indeed that Izumo class ships are also designated as DDH, In this case, however, the use of DD is only customary, and the Japanese government has NO intention of making its carrier ownership ambiguous to the international community. Because, Japan has no treaties with any countries that restrict the ownership or operation of aircraft carriers, unlike Russia.

very clever of Japan announcing to the world that it is a helicopter carrier and now, converting it to a fulltime Aircraft Carrier..

@g.-4678

3 жыл бұрын

Shhh it's just submarine hunter

@cbennetts2746

3 жыл бұрын

not even that it was announced as a helicopter destroyer

@paulsteaven

3 жыл бұрын

Well, they have a history of violating certain naval treaties so don't be surprise.

@bonfiresgt

3 жыл бұрын

Well, it's not a full-time aircraft carrier so...

@tonysu8860

2 жыл бұрын

Don't know what's so clever about a ship being designated a helicopter carrier... It's a standard description and class of military ship of a particular size, design and capability. The US for instance has a fleet of helicopter carriers... No angled decks, no fixed wing planes, only large numbers of helicopters to augment various amphibious capabilities. So, until the F-35B was considered to have very limited offensive military power and was seen mainly as support for amphibious operations. Conversion to a Lightning Carrier changes all that. Although its planes cannot carry the same payload as planes that launch from catapults, the F-35B still can carry a lot more weaponry than a helicopter and at great range (many hundreds of kilometers), all far beyond the capability of a similar sized ship that deploys only helicopters.

Outfitted with a full complement of F-35s, each Japanese carrier is more powerful than either cf China’s current carriers. And it’s not even close.

@power3480

3 жыл бұрын

@@ericvosselmans5657 not really, america is fine with their 11 super carriers with two more on the way

@dredgewalker

3 жыл бұрын

@@power3480 The US needed Japan to be fully capable in case China decides to invade other countries hence they are arming Japan with proper tools of war. They also needed carriers in case Japan needs to defend Taiwan. I don't think you're up to date with current events

@davidpnewton

3 жыл бұрын

@John Smith you do realise that you've typed a load of ill-informed nonsense? Right? Ballistic missiles CANNOT be used to hit moving ships except through the tiniest of chances or through the use of nuclear warheads. Once they launch they cannot be re-targeted. All their target has to do is keep moving and the missile will miss. Anyone who pontificates about missiles like the DF-21 being a threat to naval vessels instantly reveals themselves to be utterly ignorant about all naval matters and instantly destroys the credibility of anything they say about the area.

@dredgewalker

3 жыл бұрын

@John Smith You do realize that ships have their own defenses against anti ship weapons along with escorts that are supposed to keep the ships safe right? Why do they even invest in carriers if they get sunk so easily? This is not world War 2 where carriers are vulnerable to attack. The only thing that still poses a threat are hyper missiles but the us are already developing weapons against it.

@dredgewalker

3 жыл бұрын

@John Smith ballistic missiles at mach 25? Lol now you're tripping dude, I'm not debating with crazy

動画にしてくれてありがとうございます！ Thank you for uploading the video!

No doubts they will take a good look at the UK who are the worlds leaders when it comes to VTOL Naval operations , and for sure they will cross deck on their upcoming joint maritime exercises which will be a major first , and a new concept in the development.

Everybody knew Japan was up to something when they named the 2nd ship Kaga

@dutchvanderlinde4969

Жыл бұрын

USS Yorktown: ptsd kicked in

@sterling18

Жыл бұрын

@@dutchvanderlinde4969 I'll feel better when CVN-80 becomes operational.

@JuricksEnterprise

Жыл бұрын

I thought the same thing! Not a good sign. can Akagi, Soryu and Hiryu be far behind!! The ghost of Yamamoto raises it's head!

@handsomeman-pm9vy

Жыл бұрын

@@JuricksEnterprise Uh uh! Now you have done it China. You have awakened Japan.

I Love how easy this kzread.infoUgkxvAj3godqGAIP5rApM1laH767JGtPG1-h carrier is to adjust from my friend to me taking turns holding the baby! It provides great support on my back too! This has definitely made shopping easier! I always get asked where I get it too!

This is the first Japanese aircraft carrier after the war, and it is trying to build a total of four aircraft carriers. It is an aircraft carrier with a total length of 285 and a displacement of 65,000 tons !!!

@georgepantazis141

3 жыл бұрын

Don't think it is 285 and 50,000 that would make it bigger than the HMS Queen Elizabeth which it is not ,it is more like the Canberra class in size.

@sparkiegaz3613

3 жыл бұрын

@@georgepantazis141 50000 isn’t larger than 65000 displacement and fat Lizzie can be heavier under full displacement load

@heuhen

3 жыл бұрын

@@georgepantazis141 JS Izumo and JS Kaga is 248 meter long and 27,000 tons fully loaded.

@jameshailerthepostmaster4389

3 жыл бұрын

It's a Helicopter Destroyer.

@williamjordan5554

3 жыл бұрын

Not 65000 tons.

Ah yes, Japan’s glorious *winking* helicopter carriers

By the looks of this, the US Navy is very much on board with this. I’m just going to say this as an American, we need Japan to be strong in the region and it’s time to move on from WW2. The punitive clauses imposed on Japan needs to be lifted if they are to be a bulwark against China, Russia and North Korea.

I have to say this is my favourite carrier in the world. Beautiful machine. Also, small carriers are a great idea. More versatility, less risk.

ITS NOT AN AIRCRAFT CARRIER GODDAMIT! ITS A DESTROYER WITH AIRCRAFT CAPABILITY! Yeah but where is the Gundam hangar?

The prototype of the F-3 (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, IHI) fighter developed in Japan will be released around 2024, so please look forward to it. The engine used is a 15t class prototype engine (XF9-1) manufactured by IHI (Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries).

@Mr7700mayday

10 ай бұрын

Name it ZERO!!!

Everyone gangsta until Kaga, Akagi, Hiryu and Soryu on the sea with F-35-Zero.,

@gunturutomo6175

3 жыл бұрын

don't forget, Hakuryu

@scorpiontdalpha9799

3 жыл бұрын

But to fight China this time

@samuelgordino

3 жыл бұрын

@@scorpiontdalpha9799 Last time they also fight China... :)

@scorpiontdalpha9799

3 жыл бұрын

@@samuelgordino but the naval warfare wasn't as complicated

@zeedub8560

2 жыл бұрын

Hiryu and Soryu are attack subs, Akagi is a coast guard patrol boat. Shokaku and Zuikaku names seem to be available, though.

Keep up good work Japan Hello from the Uk

An F-35-B capable light carrier is a tremendous naval asset. It provides tremendous mission flexibility and striking power in a smaller, more affordable package. Well done Japan.

F35-B is a real game changer for countries that can't afford supercarriers. Being able to STOVL without huge capability loss from A/C variants. Leaps and bounds above harriers. Countries with light carriers need to get their orders in now; America's military industrial complex will line its pockets

@TelpPov

Жыл бұрын

it has some major capability loss, less stealth, less range, this ship can never get close to deploy F35B against china because it would well within range of missile strike.

@PW060284

Жыл бұрын

@@TelpPov No. A harrier is a major loss of capability. Having no naval aviation at all is a major loss of capability which is where Spain, Italy, Japan, Australia would be because they have no will to build aircraft carriers. Having F35Bs on a Helicopter Carrier is a humongous step up from having harriers on an LHD or conceding to have no naval aviation at all

@TelpPov

Жыл бұрын

@@PW060284 i was following ur topic of comparing with F-35 A/C Variants. Ur deviating from ur own topic by comparing with and without. Sure that's a big step up but only if you are coming up against countries without conventional carrier force.

@PW060284

Жыл бұрын

@@TelpPov My point was that the F35B is a game changer and it is for every country with "no conventional carrier force" as you put it, because that's literally every country but the USA. I'm glad you agree with that point. If you want to nitpick on what constitutes a "major" capability loss from A/C variants, that's fine. We can agree to disagree. Whatever that loss is, it is a huge step up for most countries.

@TelpPov

Жыл бұрын

@@PW060284 that's not a nitpick, most agree that the stovl jet should been a standalone developed jet completely different from F-35A/C to have prevented so many of its short comings and budget overuns which this version single handily contributed to make the most expensive weapons program of all time. Also the B is not that useful against near pear adversaries such as China or Russia and also useless to bully other countries without conventional carrier force since they do not dare go against these Nato countries anyway.

Good job JSDF.

Can you imagine some day an allied attack force in the south chayna sea consisting of 2 British carriers, 2 Japanese, 2 Australian, 6 or 7 American, 1 Indian and 1 French? Would be quite a sight.

@SanctuaryLife

2 жыл бұрын

15 carrier battle groups whats that around 700 fighter jets? Add air to air refueling to the mix with jets out of Guam, Japan and Darwin and that number would rise to 1500 in the air at any one time over the SCS.

The Kaga... Now that's a name I haven't heard for a long time.

welcome back...rough seas r await u for the next adventures !

*Excellent job by Japan to indegously developing Aircraft Carriers*

When Japan decides to do something, they always go 100%. Looking forward to future military innovations from them now that they are bolstering their military.

@anoynmanonymous8304

Жыл бұрын

Soon they will have nukes and USA will be ok with it... And Japan will eventually nuke the USA unprovoked... How stupid can the USA get...?

Well done Japan. All the best from the U.K.

Respect and love❤ from india

I'm pretty sure the f-35B compliment is known to be 8-12 depending on loadout of other aircraft? It's essentially the same as a US Wasp class, and about half the modified Wasp, America class.

Happy for Japan

Thank you Japan, we will need all the allies in the pacific we can get against any problems ... cough cough china cough cough.

USA: No aircraft carriers Japan: *Makes multi-purpose destroyer*

@squgieman

2 жыл бұрын

tbh we prefer they have carriers now, its their own constitution holding them back at this point

@herbertant4096

2 жыл бұрын

Lol, why not the US literally dupport Japanese Aircraft carrier program to counter china and help taiwan

@jackmichael2839

2 жыл бұрын

@Ryze Fafi you are wrong. USA WANTS japan to make their own carriers etc more and more now. Japan is one of the most important allies for USA now and if Japan strengthen their military forces as large as their GDP, Japan will be one of the most strong allies of USA. USA wants this to happen so much because China is rising now. but this will never happen because Japan don't want to spend money for their army. Japan don't need to strengthen their army as long as USA protects Japan. USA have to protect Japan under "Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security Between the United States and Japan". that is to say, USA have to protect Japan as long as USA have Japan as an ally.

@Fhcghcg1

2 жыл бұрын

America was actually in support of Japan acquiring carriers in 1952, 7 years after the war. The only thing stopping Japan was cost and internal restructuring of their armed forces

@ArkofGold

2 жыл бұрын

Also japan:hey im is the creator of aircraft carrirer if i never create aircraft carrier you will never have it! And you too china russia and every country with aircraft carrier

Congrats Japan 🇯🇵 From India 🇮🇳

It's amazing that the war in Ukraine has me rooting for Germany and Japan's full remilitarisation

Good to see the Carriers back.

Pretty wicked..right on Japan 🇯🇵 👍

The F-35B is a HUGE step forward in aviation. Understand that most countries do not have a large enough carrier to launch fixed wing fighter jets and instead had to use helicopters or the Harrier II. Neither are good options against a modern air force. The F-35 turns light carriers like this into MUCH more formattable ship. It is even better when combined with the Osprey. This means the US will field 11 Ford/Nimitz and 11 America/Wasp class ships that will eventually be able to carry 512 or more F-35C 220 F-35B. The F-35 i not a replacement for the F-15 or F-22, but I think it is a great replacement for the Harrier II, F-16, F-18, and F/A-18 as well as likely the Growler. Add in 189 F-22, 140 new F-15EX (if not more), 280 upgrades A-10 as well as a whole arsenals of upgraded air o air, air to ship, air to ground missiles, cruise missiles, hypersonic missiles, and glide bombs to compliment these jets. The last 5 years and the next 5 years combined has more than doubled he strength o the US air force and navy and other advancements in defensive missiles and laser defense as well as upgrades and replacement ground vehicles, the US has made some incredible improvements in a very short time. By 2035 almost everything will have been upgraded or replaced.

Love from India ❤️🇮🇳❤️🇯🇵

If Japan does decide to go ahead and build a dedicated aircraft carrier for the F35C, I'd suggest that they build something in the size of the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier it's basically a light carrier perfect for a small country like Japan and maybe also talk to other friendly country's (South Korea and Australia are the first 2 that come to mind) and see if they would be interested in buying one or two.

@carisi2k11

Жыл бұрын

Japan is an aircraft carrier and so is Australia. Australia don't need a carrier because we don't project power. When we did have aircraft carriers the only thing they were good for were carrying troops and getting involved in accidents with other ships. They never did anything with aircraft.

@jonraybon8582

Жыл бұрын

Go big or go home. Japan needs a true blue 80,000+ ton CVN

It’s been 76 years since the end of the war. We both trust, love, and forgive you Japan. Have at it and rebuild your military for god knows if there will be war in the pacific or not in the future 🇺🇸🤝🇯🇵

@B-A-L

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao trust and forgiveness and yet you have military bases all over Japan and ignore public opposition to them!

F-35b from small carriers seems to be the ticket. Italy has done this with Cavour. Britain uses them on the two QE class carriers. Others have similar plans.

@anarchyandempires5452

3 жыл бұрын

I'm sorry but the Queen Elizabeth's are definitely the definition of not a small carrier, however the point still stands, a half dozen f-35Bs launching from each of a dozen small carriers and assault ships would be the definition of an overwhelming strike, They would make a nice first strike clearing out the enemy air and damaging enemy AA so that a second strike made up of F/A-18s with their much heavier payloads can deliver the hammer blow and wipe out the enemy Navy and land installations. A fantastic strategy, especially if we have the Valkyrie fighter drone launching B-1s by that point, just imagine a massive force of 100 of 35s each being escorted by a pair of Valkyrie drones.

@donaldclifford5763

3 жыл бұрын

@@anarchyandempires5452 The QE's are quite large, and certainly the largest of the F-35b designated platforms. Interesting role you explain for the F-35b's taking the lead for the super carriers to follow on.

@anarchyandempires5452

3 жыл бұрын

@@donaldclifford5763 it only makes sense, F-35s have fairly limited payloads but have the most advanced stealth capabilities of any aircraft as well as fantastic Air dominance capabilities, they are second only to F-22s in their capacity to assassinate enemy air while remaining unseen, while their dog fighting capabilities are dubious at best this hardly matters if the enemy has no idea you are there until they get devoured by a swarm of AMRAAMs. Larger weapons like bombs and ASMs while usable by the F35 would immediately destroy it's stealth capabilities leaving it vulnerable to the enemy. The F/A-18 on the other hand, has absolutely no stealth capabilities, meaning that while it is a fantastic dog fighter more than capable of air supremacy, it would still be vulnerable to modern weapons, and so severe losses would be inevitable if it had to engage enemy Air, on the other hand the F/A-18 is capable of bringing a simply ridiculously Heavy Payload to any battle, including powerful standoff anti-ship missiles as well as radiation seeking missiles, and even precision guided munitions, meaning that so long as the hornets don't have to worry about enemy fighters literally anything a wing of them could meet they wouldn't immediately destroy. So yeah I believe the best way to fight a modern carrier battle is to send the f-35s first to destroy the enemy aircraft and then send in the hornets to destroy the enemy Navy, I want to punch of scalpels followed by warhammers.

@horationelson2440

2 жыл бұрын

@@anarchyandempires5452 The QEs are not small, however, they do not use catapults. Because of this, they would either need a lighter weight aircraft, or an aircraft that is svtol capable.

Me: “And Japanese aircraft will have landing gear for landing, right?” Japan:” “ Me: “They will have landing gear, right?”

@lukeleppla

3 жыл бұрын

It took me a second, but then I got it. Too funny!

@Marcus.Halberstram

3 жыл бұрын

Devine Wind needs no such thing

@knoahbody69

2 жыл бұрын

An F35B costs a quarter billion dollars. The landing gear better work at that price.

@yoseipilot

2 жыл бұрын

asking for ''they have landing gear?'', *facepalm*

@knoahbody69

2 жыл бұрын

@@yoseipilot A crude joke.

Never underestimate the Japanese Armed Forces, especially their navy!

日本に栄光あれ🇯🇵

Now we need Germany to build a super-heavy missile-guided cruiser and name it Bismarck to get the gang back together.

@jaubertkeithvirtudazo1388

3 жыл бұрын

*starts playing sabaton Bismarck*

@Ry_TSG

3 жыл бұрын

The boys are back in town

@ArkofGold

2 жыл бұрын

Japan:the time is back boys after 70+ years we are now here together again the gangs is back to the world! This time we wont loss we already learned lots of things from our loses! In ww2!

Beautiful ships.

The Land Cruisers of the Seas . Nothing compares .

Much love from America🇺🇸😘

@user-wx6xk2xk1v

3 жыл бұрын

Support USA from Japan🇯🇵🤜🤛🇺🇸

@catonpillow

3 жыл бұрын

Oh, would you look at that, two of the most aggressive nations in the entire human history support themselves. I almost shed a tear.

@derrickholzhey9685

3 жыл бұрын

@@catonpillow ahhh did we hurt your feelings 😈😂😄😀😌💀😑💪☝👍🍗😎

@catonpillow

3 жыл бұрын

@@derrickholzhey9685 No, but you proved my point :)

@derrickholzhey9685

3 жыл бұрын

@@catonpillow your just like dr fauci lies over lies

China should rethink their ambitions in both northern and southern seas.

@seraphimworms899

3 жыл бұрын

China already did. Four more carriers booked.

@eternalobi

3 жыл бұрын

China will rise regardless. Please defeat the corrupt CCP for us Chinese so China can become 10 times stronger.

@janusjones6519

3 жыл бұрын

@@eternalobi so its ok for China to be 10 times stronger and take over all their territorial claims as long as they aren’t ruled by the CCP?

@thegrass7199

3 жыл бұрын

I'm Anti-China but this Carrier doesn't change any development of China's expansion, considering they have a lot of Long Range Anti-Ship Missiles from land to Submarines

@Andrew-cw6od

2 жыл бұрын

@@thegrass7199 bro df21 is just another ballistic missile

Wish Malaysia can afford a carrier, cant afford the f35 though...but harrier will do for us as power projection

that is one slick Destroyer.

It's a great looking ship

Much love from Israel 👍❤️👍

Bring back the Zeroes, they were beautiful aircraft!

@Lol-ey2jg

2 жыл бұрын

They where used in the 40s its practically dead

@ArkofGold

2 жыл бұрын

Yes we need a generation 7 plane named zero

That's one state of the art stuff our country cant even dream of.

I don't always carry f35s, and since it's an experimental ship, I expect it to be a regular aircraft carrier in the future.

Long live Japan!

Escort Carrier sounds cooler. Also reminds the world of Taffy 3 that scared off the world's biggest Battleship.

I remember the first time I saw a pic of one of these helicopter destroyers I thought “who are they kidding? “

When it comes major conflict between developed countries, I don’t see how surface vessels, especially aircraft carriers, are going to last long. The trend in major conflicts is that the beginning of the next one looks like the end of the previous one.

Japan should get back in the business of building a real carrier Navy...

@d.olivergutierrez8690

3 жыл бұрын

they already have destroyers, frigates and submarines, they really only need the izumo class to have f-35s and practically you have the asia naval equivalent of the UK

@dearchful

3 жыл бұрын

why?，invading other Asian countries again?

@jameshailerthepostmaster4389

3 жыл бұрын

@@dearchful better than CCP.

@ShefortheStre

3 жыл бұрын

Their laws don't allow that.

@dearchful

3 жыл бұрын

​@@jameshailerthepostmaster4389 CCP only wants Taiwan，no one in Asia pose threat to JP，building ship like this is a waste of money unless JP wants to get rid of the armament restriction law in the future😏

Love Japan

Wow ,,,it's a good looking ship ,,I'll give it that

Nice Japan and hey from the UK

If using ww2 parlance, would these be classified as Escort or Light carriers ? Or are they a new class of Light carriers as in STVOL aircraft.

@ADB_UWIM_2807

2 жыл бұрын

Multiple role Destroyers👀🙉

yay kaga is back

Kaga, Hiryu, Akagi and Soryu are being reincarnated. Wow! Good luck Japan

At last JMSDF Now has 2 Light Aircraft Carriers.....YE....HHEEEEY.LOVE JAPAN....BANZAI.........