These clips are Amazing, thank you for sharing! 🙏❤️🇺🇸

He didn't change his mind, the Gubberment changed it for him.

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

"Gubberment": how embarrassing.

@blite13

7 ай бұрын

@@peterfraser9070 we must follow.....never step out of line.......never question authority......we are just zombies.....

@iruleatgames

13 күн бұрын

@@peterfraser9070 It's to prevent censorship...

@peterfraser9070

13 күн бұрын

@@blite13 we must follow.....never step out of line.......never question authority......we are just zombies.....": It sounds like you're describing the ct crowd.

Just shows how easy it is to convince someone that what they believe happened did not happen at all...

@ronmarvicsin7709

8 ай бұрын

As in?

@ronmarvicsin7709

7 ай бұрын

As in Oswald being the lone assassin? Yea I never bought that either

The videos you post, and your entire channel, are awesome. Much appreciated too!

Back in them days folks belived the Goverment Would always tell the truth and could do no wroung .

@emenyiris121

9 ай бұрын

Lol!

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

That doesn't mean there was a conspiracy.

@allend777

3 ай бұрын

@@peterfraser9070The Warren Commission accounted for three shots. The bullet that struck the curb is a fourth shot. According to reports the chunk of curb with a bullet indentation was removed and never seen again. This is one of many anomalies that doesn’t reflect well on the Warren Commission findings.

@peterfraser9070

3 ай бұрын

@@allend777 You're focusing on what has turned out to be errors in the Warren Report r.e. the shots and their timing. If you have curiosity to know about what really happened, why just focus on that part which was almost 60 years ago - why not think about what has been learned since then?

@allend777

3 ай бұрын

@@peterfraser9070 This “error” in the Warren Report suggests more than one shooter. Which suggests Oswald didn’t act alone. Which suggests a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. Yes, all we have learned since the assassination of President Kennedy suggests a conspiracy by the CIA to kill our President. What we have learned since the assassination is very important. Because the Warren Commission Report was a whitewash.

He mentioned Buddy Walthers , wasn't he shot to death? He found a bullet that went against the official version of something?

@TheListOf

10 ай бұрын

Yep.

@peterfraser9070

10 ай бұрын

Nope, Mr. Walters said that someone claimed for him that he had found a bullet, and that he did NOT find any bullet. More ct nonsense.

@aaronz7056

9 ай бұрын

@@TheListOf Nope.

@aaronz7056

9 ай бұрын

Walthers flatly denied anything was found, as backed up by every other cop and witness present. Walthers was shot years later trying to arrest a violent felon.

@badgumby9544

4 ай бұрын

@@aaronz7056 On 10th January, 1969, Bill Decker sent Walthers and Alvin Maddox to a motel to question Walter Cherry, an escaped convict and a man suspected of a double murder. When the two detectives entered the room Buddy Walthers was shot dead by Cherry.

To see here all in one place the footage for themselves, the many witnesses and truth of what happened, how all...nearly most, were ignored by the Warren Commission, so they could make their cover up work. I believe they had it all planned out ahead. As we know, many witnesses were told to "shut up or else" and many did unfortunately meet curiously strange endings. It's wonderful for all to see these interviews conducted by Mark Lane. I tell many ppl your channel is one of, if not THE best for original footage. Thank you Helmer!!🙏🏻🙏🏻

@aaronz7056

9 ай бұрын

WC interviewed hundreds of witnesses. Want to keep your coup top secret? Just go around threatening witnesses wholesale they'll get their legs broke if they don't lie their butts off, thus confirming a conspiracy exists to every last one of them. "Mysterious deaths list of witnesses" is an hilarious hoax where everybody on it either had little or no connection to the case or else their causes of death were misreported to sound more "sinister." For the record, Charles Brehm described Lane as a "despicable liar" and Lane disgusted many people by twisting their words.

@peterfraser9070

13 күн бұрын

"truth of what happened": ????

Tague is one of the inconvenient witnesses. His testimony made it necessary to change the shots from 2 to 3. and the photos of the two hulls on the sixth floor had to be re-taken to include 3 hulls, and Alan Spector had to create the "Magic Bullet" concept.

@aaronz7056

9 ай бұрын

"Magic" bullet makes perfect sense and is backed up by credible evidence.

@anthonywilliams9852

9 ай бұрын

@@aaronz7056 only to u.

@laurad2442

8 ай бұрын

@@aaronz7056 Actually it doesn't and is a complete fallacy.

@aaronz7056

8 ай бұрын

@@laurad2442 Well, in that case, we look forward to you explaining away all of the following: a) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet. b) As Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow. c) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them. d) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right. e) The victims' wounds all line up on a perfect trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. f) Witnesses directly under that window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. g) The bullet recovered from the stretcher was matched to Oswald's rifle. h) That bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose. i) If that bullet was a planted fake it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot. j) Why is it people like you who just sit there lecturing the theory does NOT make sense, is NOT backed up by evidence, and is a "complete fallacy" never make the slightest attempt to offer up any credible alternate scenario?

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

"Actually it doesn't and is a complete fallacy.": Unless you have anything to back that up, you are the complete fallacy.

Most witnesses involved met untimely deaths or persecution

@pjuggle

9 ай бұрын

Agreed. Systematically eliminated

@aaronz7056

9 ай бұрын

"Mysterious deaths list" of witnesses is a ridiculous hoax where everybody on it either had little or no connection to the case or else their causes of death were misreported to sound more "sinister."

@aaronz7056

9 ай бұрын

@@pjuggle Rubbish and oddly this "sinister hit squad" never killed any witness in or near the limo, on the knoll, in the motorcade, in the TSBD, at the Tippit crime scene, in the theater, on the Secret Service, on the staff at either Parkland or Bethesda Hospitals, on Air Force One, Howard Brennan, Johnny Brewer, any member of Oswald's family, Jack Ruby or his attorneys, Jim Garrison or any of his stooges, or those crackpot authors who spent years and years crowing loud and long about how they were going to blow the conspiracy wide open.

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

@@pjuggle 😂

One more witness stating the shot came from behind the fence at the grassy knoll, and he was positioned right in front of the grassy knoll.

@aaronz7056

9 ай бұрын

Connally's said the shots came from behind. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window said the shots all came from overhead. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Anybody firing a rifle behind that knoll fence would have been absurdly obvious and very visible to multiple witnesses who saw nobody there. It's vastly implausible anybody would assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.

@brettsantini9854

7 ай бұрын

@@aaronz7056 Connolly said he heard 3 shots so there must have been 4 because you never hear the bullet that hits you!

@aaronz7056

7 ай бұрын

@@brettsantini9854 What the hell did I literally just say above? In addition: Most witnesses in that echo chamber of a plaza heard 3 shots. Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a perfect trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds. Victims' reactions clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them. Bullet recovered from the stretcher, like all bullets and fragments ever found, was matched to Oswald's rifle. That bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. Why oh why would anybody think they would successfully frame this on a lone shooter as they fire away four times???

@miket5057

5 ай бұрын

​@aaronz7056 study the JFK subject and you'll learn that most of the evidence that was fed to the public is questionable, at best.

@aaronz7056

5 ай бұрын

@@miket5057 "Study it" where, exactly, at crackpot conspiracy sites or in the lie-packed books of grifting conspiracy authors? lol

He changed his story on where the shots came from because things he read and reports. Crazy he trusts what he reads over what he heardcand saw himself. I quess they threatened him too with car crash or shot

No way in hell Connelly was hit by the shot that went thru JFK’s throat. He had turned to see jfk and he wasn’t injured at that point

@PaulHenreid

10 ай бұрын

What is crazy is how obvious this fact is just watching the film.

@hamadhaider8322

10 ай бұрын

Exactly what I’ve been saying for years!!!!! When Kennedy gets hit in the throat, Connolly turns his entire body to look at Kennedy, he clearly is fine, and then u can actually see the moment he gets hit almost a second and a half later. You don’t have a delayed reaction to getting shot😂

@marmaly

10 ай бұрын

He's holding his hat I think, which means he wasn't hit yet.

@Chris.Brisson

10 ай бұрын

Holding his hat with a wrist that had just been shattered by a bullet, which then lodged in his leg. Connelly himself did not believe he was injured by the same bullet that passed through JFK.

@Gigi1111Layna

10 ай бұрын

Firstly, that neck shot went in from the front. And there's footage of Connolly turning to look at JFK as he had his hands up at his throat. Connolly was not shot at that point in time. Zap footage was cut 6-16 frames..possibly more 100th of a second. But there is an original...Connolly was in on it. Believe it. Lbj's best friend (or more!?) for 26 years, knew. There is also a smaller shot that hit JFK in the back, 2 inches lower to the left of the frontal neck wound. It shows on his back in the autopsy and also shows in his clothing. Absolutely clearly.

If someone was hit by a bullet at the underpass, then that shot did not come from a second gunman at the Grassy Knoll who would have been facing the other way.

@ronmarvicsin7709

8 ай бұрын

No one said it did.

@peterfraser9070

13 күн бұрын

@@ronmarvicsin7709 Pay attention.

The Warren Commission did not conduct ANY acoustic studies of Dealey Plaza. "We're supposed to be closing doors, not opening them." - J. Lee Rankin.

Informative channel here. 👍 👍

He never said where the shots came from. He wanted to stay alive.

Mark Lane is a genius for doing these recorded interviews so long ago very interesting stuff

ANOTHER WITNESS

Back when people trusted the GubMint.

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

"GubMint": how embarrassing for you

What did Napalitano mean?

Its interesting how so many of them changed their story well after the event. That must of been an interesting interview with the FBI😊

Who is the enemy?

@seanwhitehouse2274

8 ай бұрын

You get it! Most people arent smart enough to know who are really enemy is

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

The real enemy is the original ct authors who invented a JFK conspiracy and the current ct people who promote this agenda, ignoring science and evidence.

@blite13

7 ай бұрын

@@peterfraser9070 we all must believe in authority.....we must not think for ourselves.....obey......

@peterfraser9070

7 ай бұрын

When the investigations independent of the a-hole gov't as well have always proven it was Oswald in that window with no sign of anyone else, maybe it's time to stop being the sucker of deceptive ct books that are merely cashing in on the bandwagon.

Smart man. You get to live.

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

😂

This.... is fact!

"I now believe what the government told me to believe." Does anyone know if the lamp post arm was ever found to have a bullet mark on it?

@MrDaiseymay

10 ай бұрын

A curbstone was, and taken away by the FBI, theres a photgraph of it, the stone has disappeared.

@Chris.Brisson

10 ай бұрын

The theory is, given the angle of the "sniper's nest" to the car as it turned onto Elm, that the first shot ricocheted off of the arm of the street lamp and then traveled the length of the plaza before chipping the concrete curb (and then a chip of concrete is what drew blood from Tague's cheek). AFAIK, even after the "magic bullet" theory was adopted, no effort was made to go back and find the initial impact point of the first bullet. The branches of the tree and the arm of the street lamp were not examined. Years later, the street lamp was replaced, and efforts to find the original have not been successful.

@Chris.Brisson

10 ай бұрын

Note that in the FBI's official investigation report published in December of 1963, the three bullets were as follows: 1) Hit JFK in the throat, 2) Hit Connelly in the back, 3) Hit JFK in the head. The FBI was not looking for evidence of a bullet's impact closer to the corner. In their view, three bullets were fired, and three bullets were accounted for in JFK's car as evidenced by the injuries inflicted.

@danb2622

10 ай бұрын

@@Chris.BrissonThanks, Chris. That’s fascinating.

@Tinstared

10 ай бұрын

Okay, thanks for that information. @@Chris.Brisson

Most people heard three shots, three cartridges found at the Sniper's Nest, 1 shelll in car, 1 shell's fragments inside car, 1 shell missing, Oswald's rifle was found by police 15 minutes later outside the downstairs at the other end of the building from the Sniper's Nest.

@Chris.Brisson

10 ай бұрын

It is interesting to read the statement that Tague gave to the police on the day of the shooting with regard to the number of shots heard. The recollections of a witness recorded that day were not yet tainted by authorities branding him a troublesome crackpot.

@Gigi1111Layna

10 ай бұрын

It's amazing just how many ppl we see stating they heard 3 shots, and equally say 4 shots. We know with the places hit, there were more. From curbs, to found bullets that the unknown man pocketed, to two in JFK and Connolly, one. But I've heard two amazing footages of both 4 shots and 5 shots. Some sort if silencer of that day must of been used. And, or, footage cut off short. It's incredible the cover up foresight.

@Gigi1111Layna

10 ай бұрын

@williamwells It wasn't "Oswald's rifle" that has been clearly established. IMHO, his palm print was planted.

@Gigi1111Layna

10 ай бұрын

@@Chris.Brisson Yep. That's why all this footage for ppl to see and discern for themselves is so important.

@grahamnimmo4656

10 ай бұрын

The official police report confirmed the rifle found on the 6th floor to be a german mauser rifle and not an italian carconal rifle. An officer on the 6th floor that was a gun guru, was asked by one if his fellow officers, what kind of rifle was it. As he appoached the rifle he said that it looked like a Mauser. When he looked closley at the rifle hw confirmed this and he pointed out to all the officers there, that the rifle was clearly stamped on the barrel "Muaser" follwed by the caliber rating. That all went into the officially logged police report. It wasnt until later that it was miraculously claimed to have been the same type that Oswald had, but even that allegedly found rifle, was different from the one purchased by oswald as it had side mounted strap rings instead of undermounted strap rings that Oswalds rifle had. Very wierd how this massive screw up in the cover up managed to go unchallenged, even today!

So in 1963, he believed the shots came from the grassy knoll. In 1964 he told the WC he believed the shots came from the knoll, and then let Liebeler get him to say the shots could've also come from the TSBD. In 1966 he tells Mark Lane he believed the shots came from the TSBD, because of what was told in the media and such. And in 1998, in the book No More Silence by Larry Sneed, he reverted back to the grassy knoll as the origin of the shots. This man can't be taken seriously.

Always believe your eyes, your ears and your gut. God gave you these senses and they don't have an agenda. Nugget of the day, a man with an experience is never subject to another's opinions or conclusions. Believe in yourself..

Watt was the smoke silly? Nobody ever says what it was. I don't get it.

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

There were shady, indirect rumours of "smoke"; cigarette smoke, steam form a steam pipe by the fence, the sun catching a coke bottle thrown in the air, which, strangely enough, morphed into a rifle flash...you get the silly idea.

@ronmarvicsin7709

7 ай бұрын

I have the photo that proves there was smoke coming from the grassy knoll area behind the fence. Anything of direct evidence that there was a conspiracy the WC supportsers try to shoot down quickly. Not this time. @@peterfraser9070

Surely.that.special.day A.lot.of.people.had.cine.camera And.photos. Where.are.these Fbi.cannot.have.them.all

Rest in eternal peace President John Fitzgerald Kennedy 😢❤😢 a terrible shame that you're life was tragically cut short by an assassin's bullet 😢❤😢

Teague confirmed no front shooter . 3 shots . How did he confirm it ? 3 shots were what Junior Jarman , Bonnie Willams and Harold Norman heard . They were positioned one floor below Oswald’s perch in the TSBD . This compelling evidence of one shooter , 3 shots from the TSBD . All 3 men heard 3 shots only .

reMARKable researcher boy & girls. Pay attention.

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

ReMARKLANEable conspiracy to push a false conspiracy on the world and make an infamous name for himself.

Tague was hit by a fragment from the headshot.

@reallygreekguy

8 ай бұрын

Yeah, that's how it happened. Keep swallowing everything the government gives you to drink.

@peterfraser9070

8 ай бұрын

or the 1st bullet and he heard the echo and it seemed like the 2nd shot.

@AMC2283

6 ай бұрын

don't you mean a frag from the headshot nicked the concrete which tague was then hit by?

@rawbacon

6 ай бұрын

@@AMC2283 Are you're implying a chip of concrete hit Tague? There's barely a nick in the concrete, much more likely the bullet fragment ricocheted off the concrete and hit Tague. Basically that little nick would be like sand particle flying off and I doubt that would cause his cheek to bleed.

Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds. Their reactions clearly demonstrate they hear the deflected, first shot. Their reactions clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound at the right temple consistent only with a shot from behind. Most witnesses heard 3 shots. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.

@kencabeen7786

8 ай бұрын

No, massive exit wound at the occipital region of the skull, consistent with a frontal shot. You don’t really believe the government’s lie about this, do you?

@reallygreekguy

8 ай бұрын

The Warren commission's need for matching the timeline to the shots was ruined by Tague's injury. That's why the ridiculous magic bullet theory was put forth. Without it, the Warren Commission would have to concede that more than three shots had been fired, thereby proving that there was a conspiracy, and that their lone gunman story didn't hold water.

@reallygreekguy

8 ай бұрын

No, the reaction by Connally to Kennedy's neck shot was he turned around to look at Kennedy while still holding his Stetson. If he'd been hit with the same bullet, he would've dropped that hat, instantly, because the bullet shattered that wrist. The single bullet doesn't stack up because the video and the condition of the bullet tell a different story.

@aaronz7056

8 ай бұрын

@@reallygreekguy Connally was still clutching the hat in that hand when they arrived at the hospital and the bullet is in exactly a condition consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet.

@rawbacon

8 ай бұрын

@@reallygreekguy Tague had nothing to do with the Single Bullet Fact, you Mentally Stunted Conspiracy Cultist have been claiming that forever but there's absolutely zero truth to it.