Every experience, memory, thought, and emotion happens in our consciousness. To have an experience we must be aware. Please enjoy your brief existence.

@panismith1544

2 жыл бұрын

🤔 analytical speaking, yes - we are aware of our existence...thoughts transcends into consciousness, consciousness into being, of self awareness, of existence. (Knowing)

@bobaldo2339

2 жыл бұрын

@@panismith1544 Ah, but all "we" directly know are sensations, sights, sounds, smells, textures, thoughts that seem to occur in "our heads", etc. From these sensations it is inferred that there is an inside (an individual "consciousness"), and an outside (an environment, a physical universe if you like). Both of these inferences require a great leap of faith to swallow. In reality, we don't know anything at all for certain. This "I think therefore I am" business is utter nonsense. Descartes might as well have said , "I stink therefore I am!" All he was saying really is , "I therefore I". It was just his ego assertion - the equivalent of a "selfie" in terms of its supposed "profundity".

@vincentfalsaperla

2 жыл бұрын

our consciousness comes from out side...our brain is just an antenna

@Mr.CreamCheese69

2 жыл бұрын

We experience the body and it's functions because it's aspects of our awareness. Turn of sight for example, sight is gone. Turn of it all, it's all gone. Thus, non self is the baseline, and the full body mind/universe state, is created FOR the awareness to experience. There really is no outside world, it's all inside the mind. It's existence depends on the knower of it

@iordannelucas

Жыл бұрын

@@bobaldo2339 you do a disservice. You can doubt everything in existance except your own existence. Since doing so would require you to exist in the first place.

Simulation or not... I still have to go to work.

@luisfernando5998

2 жыл бұрын

Not if you hack the simulation code

@FortitudineVincimus

2 жыл бұрын

@@luisfernando5998 I really need to get the infinite money cheat code...

@luisfernando5998

2 жыл бұрын

@@FortitudineVincimus I mean even kids became like millionaires today instantly through like social media and stuff like Bitcoin ….. definitely using cheat codes and hacks

@tshirtspot5455

2 жыл бұрын

@@FortitudineVincimus somehow i feel like we all have it, it's just a matter of tuning in to the frequency (mindset) to recieve a so-called cheat code.

@abloogywoogywoo

4 ай бұрын

@@FortitudineVincimus we'd probably get deleted by whatever's running the hologram sim. Our fun isn't their goal. :(

The holographic thing could be true because in reality we don't really touch anything, atoms don't touch each other Everything our whole reality is just a transfer of information through various mediums and they all need the observer / conciousness.

Read all of Brians books. He articulates science in a very clear and comprehensively.

Another awesome video, really love the channel keep up the good work guys!! 👌

The one thing that does not need a “theory” or hypothesis to verify its reality: We move and have our being in a holographically projected simulated universe. All we need to study is light in all its expressions and how we perceive it. ✨👁✨ “Cones and rods are two types of photoreceptors within the retina. This means that they are responsible for receiving signals (or images), processing them, and sending them to the brain. The cone and the rod serve different purposes to work towards the same goal: helping you see!” And this is only a sliver of the electromagnetic light spectrum that the eyeballs could process. Within this holographically projected simulated universe, every image that one sees is just a “signal” captured by the eyeball, in which the brain translates into a workable image. The brain doesn’t see the actual image of anything, it only interprets the various photonic particles (pixels) it can, which is very limited. On a quantum level, everything we perceive in life is just an simulation of light itself, and this can happen in analog or digitally. Those who are throwing around “the simulation hypothesis” today are only referring to digital gaming technology to correlate their musings, while dismissing or ignoring the analog. It’s much more simpler that that. The study of light in all its various expressions, and how the brain and its eyeballs function in relation to such light, tells us all we need to know to prove we’re living in a simulation. ✨👁✨ Now, there are two roads before us: You can choose to remain as a Simulation, or you can choose to become an Emanation... for this you need to employ the technology of the science of Authentic Tantra.

@stevensteven3417

Жыл бұрын

We are inside an electromagnetic simulation

@delitatactics6721

Жыл бұрын

True reality must be some crazy shit we can only see a fraction of it and even then were only seeing signals secondhandedly

"thank you for uploading these videos. Even if I'm having a hard night, I just put a relaxing astronomy video on and listen. It always makes my nights go much easier. Thank you!!!"

I read until the end of time, his science book, and it was very impressive.

@bernieflanders8822

2 жыл бұрын

he has not written a bad book.

I was born Inside the event Horizon of a black hole just like everyone else, we are “Frozen here together” in this time being …Everything is Frozen into time, the freezing is part of the embedding. People have a bias that a black hole is unlike the world around us

@poopandfartjokes

2 жыл бұрын

Nothing is frozen in time. Not even a picture captures a single moment in time.

@smileifyoudontexist6320

2 жыл бұрын

@@poopandfartjokes I Agree with you… I meant frozen as in a hot frying is actually very cold….. Throw some dust in the air and then project a movie onto the dust…. How still could something in the Movie Be?

@smileifyoudontexist6320

2 жыл бұрын

@@poopandfartjokes Or everything IS frozen Like a picture and Nothing whatsoever moves !? We perceive movement because we are in an Inertial Frame(Time) Continuum. All Matter and every Particle are “Super-Positioning” at an imperceptible Planck Length . (Like trying to count millimeters looking through a small hole at 60 mph) It all Appears to be Flowing SpaceTime?

@Masoch1st

Жыл бұрын

​@@smileifyoudontexist6320 how high are you right now?

Very well explained. Thanx

00:35 "This is not just a wild speculation." Yes, it is. Gerard 't Hooft ignited interest in 2D external-sheet holography with his 1993 fiat declaration that "One Boolean variable per Planckian surface element [of an event horizon] should suffice." [1] Realistic, physics-based bits require complex mechanisms to fight back quantum uncertainty and become _harder_ to implement at sub-atomic scales, not easier. 2D holographic sheets nonetheless approximate reality because quantum mechanics has been holographic since the 1920s. The founders of quantum mechanics quickly realized that the holographic equivalent of the Schrodinger wave function, called the momentum-space wave function, is just as fundamental as the xyz version. The word "hologram" did not exist then, so they expressed the relationship in terms of Fourier transforms. The quantum holographic relationship works in both directions since the xyz view is also the hologram of the momentum-space view of reality: a two-way or dual hologram. Quantum holography is far closer to 3D-matrix or "Denisyuk" holography than 2D planar holography. Instead of speculative external 2D branes of paradoxical bits, vast swaths of ordinary matter encode more conventional forms of information to express the hologram. A new (April 2022) PRL paper [2] explores the fascinating problem of how the universe encodes itself holographically by looking at black holes in a way that flips the 't Hooft model upside down. No one in the 1920s knew how to integrate momentum holograms with general relativity if they even thought to try. Thus, the cosmic branch of quantum holography remained in limbo until 't Hooft reintroduced the idea, albeit in a needlessly exotic fashion. In sharp contrast, quantum holography with a different terminology quickly exploded for condensed matter physics and remains vital to that field a century later. Folks interested in cosmic quantum holography thus might want to talk more to condensed matter folks. ---- [1] G. 't Hooft, _Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity._ arXiv Preprint Gr-Qc/9310026 (1993). See page 6, paragraph 2, sentence 4. arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9310026 [2] X. Calmet, R. Casadio, S. D. Hsu, and F. Kuipers, _Quantum Hair from Gravity,_ Physical Review Letters 128, 11 (2022). journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.111301 ---- Terry Bollinger CC BY 4.0 2022-04-16.1727 ET Sat sarxiv.org/apa.2022-04-16.1527.pdf

@3raxha

2 ай бұрын

He said "this is not just wild speculation, but a theory that scientists take very seriously." You misrepresent his meaning when you cherry pick the part of the quote.

@TerryBollinger

2 ай бұрын

@@3raxha, the feedback is appreciated, but my comment was directed at the source of this entire debate, not the video. Gerard ’t Hooft is a nice fellow, and quite humble, so I flatly cannot picture him claiming in his original paper the idea he had just proposed was necessarily a “serious theory.” Later, sure, a lot of folks - and, especially, Professor Leonard Susskind - jumped on his wild speculation like bees on honey. That tends to happen when Nobel Laureates come up with some ideas that sound incredibly fun to explore, maybe for decades. Also, think about what you just said. Did you address my point that classical bits require machinery, complexities, and masses at least in the range of an atom or so - chemical bonds, for example - to qualify as “bits”? Or did you appeal to a social belief system - “some people say” as sufficient? (And no, electron spins are not “bits” until you acknowledge the mass and complexity of the magnetic field generator needed to orient the spins. A common mistake, that.) Finally, don’t forget that Wheeler’s Planck foam speculation was rather spectacularly disproven - by more than three orders of magnitude - by the 2020 HAWC Collaboration study of spacetime smoothness using extreme cosmic gamma rays. If space is 2000 times too smooth to support any kind of structure at the supposed “Planck” scale - kudos to Einstein on that win - why is anyone even talking about Planck-scale uncertainty suddenly transforming itself into the fundamental unit of infinitely precise classical certainty, better known as a “bit”? The real problem is sunk cost. If an idea fails spectacularly in the lab, but you and folks around you have invested entire careers in it, do you say, “Oops, sorry everyone, HAWC just proves the Planck scale doesn’t exist, so as of today, we’re shutting down all of our graviton and ‘super’ string research. Sorry about that!” Of course not. That’s not human nature. Instead, you come up with an excuse, perhaps to “explore” the “beauty” of math on the premise that since math, unlike grubby experimental physics, is “perfect” and thus must, surely, somehow, someday figure out the solution _regardless_ of what grubby experiments say. So, again: It’s nice that a lot of folks took Professor ’t Hooft’s idea seriously, but that was never the question. The question is whether Planck-scale regions of supposedly pure uncertainty - which have been soundly proven by good data not to exist - have a plausible mechanism by which they can flip in the opposite direction and suddenly become extremely classical devices with sufficient mass and structure to retain a yes-no distinction indefinitely. My vote is no.

Some of the brightest and most intelligent alive 500 years ago thought the Earth was flat and the center of the universe, just think about how wrong we are right now and what the scientific community will say about us in 500 years.

@dr.fjoer_the_crazy_scienti5841

2 жыл бұрын

We discovered that Earth is round more than 2000 years ago

@monodriver001

2 жыл бұрын

You are looking at only one side and not at the whole scenario back then.

@andsalomoni

2 жыл бұрын

No one believed that the Earth was flat, at least since the ancient greeks.

@mattwood1233

Жыл бұрын

Ancient Greece mathematically proved the Earth was round, 2000 years ago. Many scientific principles will likely be building blocks but not completely replaced. But overall I agree, it would be very interesting to know how wrong we are on things we take as fact today. I think about that all the time Edit: Just realized somebody else beat me to it. Should have read the comments.

@abloogywoogywoo

4 ай бұрын

they're saying it isn't even flat though, just a hemisphere, which is absurd whichever way you cut it.

In other words we don’t know nothing…. So detailed explanations about black holes are ridiculous! We don’t know if they exist let go how they functioning.

The OSI Information Theory model demonstrates one way a universe of pure vibrating energy fields could exist without the need of actual particles, part of this relies on the Holographic Principle. We are pure, unadulterated energy, configured so as to simulate mass and dimension. (So I believe, based on several credible sources - Bohm, Pribram, Susskind ...)

Sophisticated along the lines of Greek Myth. It's no longer Atlas holding up the sky, or the devil in the underworld. My myth would be a quantum understanding of black hole curves in the time continuum to maybe further assess our time and place in it. Would be another one small step for man type thing except a deeper discovery of the cosmos which would do really well.

in past space time i used to fall asleep trying to understand concepts from Brian Greene's talks "now" i fall asleep trying to understand concepts from a man trying to understand concepts from Brian Greene's talks . Is it turtles all the way down ?

That's is a good information thanks

Vedant teaches that consciousness is singular. All happenings are played out in one universal consciousness and there is no multiplicity of selves says Erwin Schrodinger.

Quantum Entanglement is what makes the projection of our "reality" possible and relevant.

Could black holes just be where whoever or whatever is outside the simulation collecting the info from the simulation?

@OhhSlash

Жыл бұрын

Well then how would you explain a black hole sucking up another black hole?

@abloogywoogywoo

4 ай бұрын

Not sure how destroying stars collects information on them. Besides if they made a sim via a Quantum Computer that had stars, then they already have all the information they need. The reasons why they'd run this sim this big and for this long is unknown...

How fallacious it is to think that if our consciousness allows us to experience reality, then there is nothing external to our consciousness! Everything is not a hologram. The kind of special pleading you have to do to reach such a conclusion is incredible!

"and all things We have enumerated in a clear register."

@amenhotep7704

6 ай бұрын

The Qu'ran

When I put this steak in my mouth, the Matrix is telling me it’s juicy and tastes great.

In other words! That’s the most concise way of saying.I DON’T KNOW. 😂

So something made a holographic "image" of all time and we're living in that pocket dimension. To quote Bill Cipher: “Remember! Reality's an illusion, the universe is a hologram, buy gold! Byeeee!”

“Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion.” - Democritus.

Can someone help me I have a Question : Leonard Susskind has spoken about the possibility of a black holes event horizon storing the information of all the matter that falls into it and that we may exist within such a structure..If this is so it would make sense that we exist bound to the event horizon as everything is numerical and mechanical in our perception of the known universe?..the problem I see is we had to fall into the void in the first instance and that would mean spaghettification had to occur tearing everything asunder and doesn't that mean that everything we know doesn't exist anymore and we are nothing more than the data stored on the EH?.. If this is a possibility then we can never see the real scale of things because time slows on the EH and time beyond that would be running at a different speed so moving towards it would be pointless as we are entangled in the mighty hold of a black hole that will eventually recede and cease to be?

It's beyond impressive how eloquent Brian speaks about these theories and ideas. Mind blown, as always.

@michaelbariso3192

Жыл бұрын

The theory of everything according to humans that believe their intellect evolved from a monkey's brain. If the light waves from the sun were 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of Einstein's space-time then people on Earth are just imagining the infrared warmth of the sun coming up on the horizon. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-) The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-) Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Monkey see monkey do, the science of monkeys have brainwashed you. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-). The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Revelation 22:13. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord Albert, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron

I propose an amended inverse Invisible/Holographic Principle. Two sides of the same coin. Both states existing at the intersection of the observables and the unobservable universe of our realities.

It's remarkable and a lil crazy how ancient cultures like Hinduism and Buddhism also called the world as Maya ,an illusion and developed mind-blowing philosophies around the same concepts.

@cecilkeith1951

Жыл бұрын

Wild

@gamingclipz7309

Жыл бұрын

🤦‍♂️ 🤡

The gravitational force needs to be reviewed. When the amount of elementary particles falling from space is 100 When the amount of elementary particles penetrating from the other side of the earth to your feet is 80 This difference of 20 is the attraction.

@zaw2654

2 жыл бұрын

Even Einstein said Gravitational Force is an illusion. Gravity does not pull anything - Space pushes.

@Ascendlocal

2 жыл бұрын

Not sure where you are headed with this comment. However, it is true, that Gravity is not necessarily a force. It’s a matter of preference and perhaps semantics among physicists.

Yes. You would think you could reduce things into smaller and smaller constituents. This would explain the large. What you find is the small constituent’s the large. Maybe reality is tv screen

"For The World Is Hollow And I Have Touched The Sky"

I hate it when documentaries place value on things through words like "just" or "only". This doesn't make any sense and really grinds the information being said. This is "just" a KZread video on the universe. This is a KZread video on the universe. The difference is enormous.

So actually like a 3D video game on flat tv screen. Just “slightly” more advanced.

What if the stars was just a detailed 3D hologram that we can look at but never travel through 🤔

@shanemcinally2218

Жыл бұрын

If that was true dart would if went through the astroid not boom into it as well as cassini would of came out the other end of Saturn unscathed.

I was born Inside the event Horizon of a black hole just like everyone else, we are "Frozen here together" in this time being ...Everything is Frozen into time, the freezing is part of the embedding. People have a bias that a black hole is unlike the world around us

The arbitrary and finite "rules" regarding availability of information to observers sure does seem like something that'd govern a holodeck in Star Trek.

Wouldn't it make sense that black holes would just be broken down pieces of matter into its smallest parts (like sub-atomic particles) that are just packed more tightly together as a result of the incredible force applied by the black hole? I think projection theory really stops making sense when you take flexible measuring tape and wrap it around a circumference. If it was 2-dimensional and projected, you wouldn't be able to get a 3-dimensional measurement physically.

No space time itself is wrong concept.

The thoughts of not knowing is what keeps us thinking which keeps us in space time.

This is beyond my dyslexic abilities. But I have a question, if everything is holographic projection and our brain is just mapping everything. I don’t get it if a truck strikes me and I die, how is my brain mapping that incident and I get all injured or even killed. My brain can’t fake that. Even if it does, how can everyone else brain perceive same thing. Even let’s say it’s a pattern that let’s say everyone sees, but what about the injury/death. Maybe brain just makes you believe that you are dead . Maybe it’s a hologram and no one is actually real. But to decode this we need to understand consciousness better

Not a holigram but one persons experience of the world this is created for me

If you have points in space-time (singularity) where your mathematics fail; its because your mathematics are incorrect or incomplete. Newton and companies discovered how to calculate the effects of gravity, but didn't know how it worked. Einstein discovered how gravity actually works, but only in very special cases. There's obviously a next step into this puzzle and it's to discover what gravity is, what are it's constituent parts? Is it a composite or a single unit?

By any chance, are you hiring for a video editor?

A hologram requires line of sight to project a 3D image. A single object would be represented everywhere on the 2D circumference of the sphere; but what if you put this object in a box? Does this not now block the projection from certain angles and effectively put the first object out of sight and unable to receive information? How can you have layers of information on a 2D surface? Very confusing and seemingly pointless to me.

Superb video!!! Holographic Theory can best studied (and proven) in stock markets, that information is preserved on the event horizon based on scalar time. Use Square Root of 10 and plank time! You WILL SEE that history repeats itself based on simple fractal (continued fraction) numbers. All information is stored and echoed back towards us. In old speak "what goes around, comes around" is a basic truth. One only has to look at the correct time-frames when this hologram principal plays out.

I wish the holographic principle was better explained. Why should we be a projection of some distant 2D information, "why does it feel real?", how would that work, etc.

In reality we are all in a dream

@abloogywoogywoo

4 ай бұрын

you can't read in a dream

Thinking about quantum time I thought about the sun dial and how it was timing space then realized the core is connected to space first before the top side so we have to record core time tempature to load with atmosphere time pressure temperature to match the load sound of void time to accurately get the quantum time structure the core know the sun time so it knows when to start the day with pressure light activity or Cosmic energy like timing atoms to there kinetic structure body hold of why is the form in this time motion

So what is the projection method of this Hologram? And is it "OUT SIDE" ? ....Reaching

@bounceday

3 ай бұрын

Its like fuzzy blackholes. I think that's a simplification of their explanation.

Why current flow in wire produce magnetic field????

Could the 2d dimension be hyperbolic. There's no reason to assume its flat is there?

If a cheeseburger is a hologram, we don’t need teeth😁 But we definitely need brain😁

In 2 dimension, X^2; in 3d, X^3 but In which dimension √X and X^4

So who is projecting the hologram? Wouldn’t there need to be an intelligence projecting it?

seeing how some countries, and ancient civilizations knew astronomy and even distances of various star systems..with no knowledge of physics, or mathematical theories...odds are the way we are measuring things is whats wrong. some how, way shape, size or form..the rudimentary systems they had are more or less how we should be approaching things. as opposed to theories, revolving around other theories, with hopes that it all aligns

If this theory is true, Why didn't we observe holographics of the object already devoured, around the black holes?

We are a DVD, why is that so hard?😂

The future belongs to augmented reality partly. Some factors are gonna heart the nature of things, as the fact that we are not alone in the universe.

Look into Henri Bergson.

I like these stuff 1am

Most likely: we all are made of Atoms, if you look close enough at how our Physicality is Structured you'll see how the Atoms are Arranged, you can fit each Atom in a Cube; you can't see it, but it's there delimiting each ⚛️ Atom.

One could liken the universe to a chromosome or allele, whose dna sequence of the entire organism is wrapped around , just as the two dimensional field wraps the universe and dictates what happens within

@panismith1544

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting, analogy.

@kingnarothept6917

2 жыл бұрын

That does beg the question. What about 1d, 3d, 4d, 5d etc? Those dimensions do play vital roles if they exist.

Is TV what you see on the screen as an image ? Of course not. Through your brain an your technology you see the universe in a certain way that is far what the universe really is

It's not because a hologram is not in any way energy matter, A holograms is a protection of bits and bits are don't make atoms to have matter!

So someone else is controlling my turtle heads when I poo? That’s disturbing….. my bathroom etiquette that is

Currently getting pissed off trying to push through this hologram table 😡

If everything is a hologram, how do objects have weight

Space and time can not be at the same time space desroys itself every TIME and infinity is within just think about it for some Time

Fantastic episode. Brian Greene is such a good communicator of Science. The modern day Carl Sagan for sure.

But what would the purpose of this be. And who or what made this holographic world 🌎

Cool, narrated by the Geico Gecko it seemed but here are my problems with this presentation. In its entirety My Green speaks in a sing-song fashion with undue confidence in his words not reflecting that inspection and detection brings about deeper interrogation, not resolution. In other words, as Carl Sagan spoke as in constant question of knowledge rather than in aha now we know, its settled. And make up your mind about light. Does it matter, or does it not. We feel the effects of sunlight on our skin but have the audacity to say it is not matter. And then he limits all of the universe to man made supposition called physics; preposterous. I enjoy talks like these because theyre thought provoking not because i believe they surpass our intuition with intellect.

Sorry but nothing in this video explains anything about this holographic universe ! When Brian Greene was speaking he did not explain it. There are a lot of so called theories out there. The big problem I have (and I have studied physics degree) is that we have lost our way through over reliance on mathematics and less and less concern for observational study. Well the math says it could work therefore we have a theory. Observation is key, let's do real physics and get back to this fundamental aspect of developing theories and away from getting lured by science fiction.

@alkhemetic

2 жыл бұрын

The one thing that does not need a “theory” or hypothesis to verify its reality: We move and have our being in a holographically projected simulated universe. All we need to study is light in all its expressions and how we perceive it. ✨👁✨ “Cones and rods are two types of photoreceptors within the retina. This means that they are responsible for receiving signals (or images), processing them, and sending them to the brain. The cone and the rod serve different purposes to work towards the same goal: helping you see!” And this is only a sliver of the electromagnetic light spectrum that the eyeballs could process. Within this holographically projected simulated universe, every image that one sees is just a “signal” captured by the eyeball, in which the brain translates into a workable image. The brain doesn’t see the actual image of anything, it only interprets the various photonic particles (pixels) it can, which is very limited. On a quantum level, everything we perceive in life is just an simulation of light itself, and this can happen in analog or digitally. Those who are throwing around “the simulation hypothesis” today are only referring to digital gaming technology to correlate their musings, while dismissing or ignoring the analog. It’s much more simpler that that. The study of light in all its various expressions, and how the brain and its eyeballs function in relation to such light, tells us all we need to know to prove we’re living in a simulation. ✨👁✨ Now, there are two roads before us: You can choose to remain as a Simulation, or you can choose to become an Emanation... for this you need to employ the technology of the science of Authentic Tantra.

NO. ONE. KNOWS. Including Brian Greene! 1:28 ...might be sort of like... genius!

@andsalomoni

2 жыл бұрын

...might be kind of a sort of thing in some way similar to something like a...

Right on cool video!!!!

I am a butterfly dreaming that I am a human.

@schmetterling4477

2 жыл бұрын

So you got the best of both worlds. Just watch out for the birds. :-)

Who made the hologram?

Soooo you pose the question and then forget about it half-way through? Ok….

@michaelfried3123

2 жыл бұрын

this is rubbish, its really just garbage philosophy being passed off as science.

Soooooo...IF it's All a Hologram, what did NASA achieve and where?!?! did they achieve if not on the Moon..or Space?!?!

Next time a hungry bear is charging you don't panic, it's only a hologram

@abloogywoogywoo

4 ай бұрын

which makes us as real as the bear...

We've come a long way so far. The light bulb is only 100yrs old

I cant get this thought out of my head that I am in a simulation. There are others in this simulation but some people are just npc's. I picture waking up and them asking me and me answering.. "i wasnt 100% convinced."

@thermalrain_yt9725

2 жыл бұрын

Dude I'm all for this. The more you actually look around and pay attention to people. Fuck me no way that's not an npc just running programs. I use this example every time. I like pokemon cards. Ever week I go to walmart to check the new stock. They put the cards in an aisle that's a self checkout but it's the big ones with the table. There are 5 others right next to it. Plus all the smaller self checkouts. So many times Ive been there with 2 empty big rows and half the smaller ones are open. There will be 2 people in line and another person will walk up and get in line!! Wtf no thinking agent is gonna stand in that line. I'm dead serious I really think those are npcs. Just there to be in my way. I've thought about going up to random people and saying hey can I come see your house. Lol I would never but man no way there are 8 billion people with minds like mine. They're just drones filling up my world. Anyway I've been telling people this and some agree and I get some weird looks too. Nice to see others are aware of this

@TheSCPStudio

2 жыл бұрын

@@thermalrain_yt9725 it’s kinda weird talking to another person who feels this way… because shouldn’t we both feel like the person were replying to is an NPC? It makes sense in a coding perspective though. A lot of human consciousness is defined by following routines, patterns, normalcy, etc. that’s why political parties work so well and why social trends happen. In coding, it would be much easier to make the AI path in ways that eliminate excess calculations. Using your example of checkout lines; the program would have to specifically calculate which lanes are empty and which has at least one person in line. It would have to also calculate whether or not the lines themselves are open or not. If a lane is empty it would have to calculate if that lane is closed or if there’s simply no one there. And if no lanes are empty, it would have to calculate which lane would be the shortest to wait in. So it’s just much easier for the ‘program’ to decide "there are people in that line, it MUST be operational, I will use that". Hell maybe you and I ARE NPCs, just programmed to be the ones who are able to find those empty lines and be the first one in them, allowing for the lesser developed ‘programs’ to easily path to us.

@andsalomoni

2 жыл бұрын

Simulation run by whom? It's more senseful to say that we are living an illusion. We are superposing a dream to actual reality. We are dreaming with our eyes open.

It's weird how everything we think we see is through the prism of our eyes and brain. Even camera images are still processed by our eyes and brain. How do we know what we see is truly real?

@markrockliff2742

2 жыл бұрын

Yer that's tricky we think ever thing has color but every thing is gray and color comes from light refracting of the irregular surfaces of objects.

@GK-qc5ry

2 жыл бұрын

@@markrockliff2742 but the colours themselves are what our eyes and brain interpret as colour.

Brian still plays with favorite toy of mathematicians - differential equations with boundary conditions - nothing new and no breakthrough. If you want to read how asymmetry on borders of time bubbles lead to matter creation - read Bob Lazar Cutting Edge: In any point of space where time is homogeneous any matter born annihilates, but not in time dilation areas.

@Smile_Wave

Жыл бұрын

Brian rides waves of none of his breakthrough

Everyone always wonders what it would be like to fall into a black hole. Has anyone ever entertained the notion that maybe it's impossible for anything to fall in? I mean, there's nothing to fall into. If space itself turns into time and vice versa inside the event horizon, and anything that moves does so through space, then it seems to me that you can't fall into one. Seems like all you can ever do is orbit. Get close enough and you'll never be able to leave the orbit - because it looks as if space itself is twisted into a vortex. 🤷‍♂️

@Ascendlocal

2 жыл бұрын

You are actually right if you are an observer from the outside looking at, observing a person falling in. Why, because time comes to a standstill from the observers point of view (General relativity). However, if you are the person falling in, then yes, you pass (spatially) through the event horizon, a mathematical vector in 4D, 3 of space 1 of time. But once you pass the event horizon, you can never communicate with the observer on the outside of the event horizon, yet you continue to fall further and with exponentially greater velocity. (to your death of course as your body mass is pulled apart first to it’s constituent parts, atoms and from there we don’t know because there is no Grand Unified Theory) Weird stuff, huh?

@justinbyrge8997

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ascendlocal It's pretty neat. I'm not good with the math part, I'm just a dude. But it did seem that even if I were the person falling in, I still couldn't cross the event horizon. The way in imagining it is like a vortex of water going down a drain. The water being analogous to space and anything in the water being analogous to anything in space. It looks like a funnel with a wide mouth on top and a point at bottom. The bottom is the singularity and the wide mouth is what we observe as the black hole. Now, in water you can jump that gap in the tunnel where there's no water, from the vortex. But if space is doing that in the form of a black hole, then nothing can jump the gap because there's no space there. Follow? In a water vortex, you can fall into the vortex, but essential all your doing is orbiting a center of nothing due to the rapid rotation of the vortex. In space, if a black hole is just a vortex made of space itself, then from observer view nothing "falls" in. But if I'm "falling in", even from my point of view my orbit only gets smaller and faster around a center of "no space", and it seems like I'd be getting smaller and smaller along with the space as it is contracting at the bottom of the funnel, assuming I can survive of course. I wish I could learn the math lol

@Ascendlocal

2 жыл бұрын

@@justinbyrge8997 no, I think you are spot on..Forget.the math. The water vortex is.a great analogy. It's very similar to that effect. But the black hole's gravity is pulling towards the singularity. It becomes so intense, the gravitational effects on your feet are exponential to the effect on your head, assuming you are entering feet first. The force is truly amazingly incomprehensible. and no one knows what singularity is. Is it a "white hole" spewing out matter or another big bang of a new or another universe? We don't know

@justinbyrge8997

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ascendlocal What's at the bottom of a water vortex that we find in a lake or ocean? Now think of a water vortex with no land at the bottom. That's your answer 😁 OK, where's my money? Lol

@Ascendlocal

2 жыл бұрын

@@justinbyrge8997 no one knows. That's why they call it singularity. Translated..it means. We don't know. This is the Grand Unification Theory every single theoretical physicist and particle physicist is trying to solve. But rest assured, it's at the quantum mechanical level. It's not some imagined landscape of utopia

Well everything we see that looks and feels solid is made up of more than microscopic particles moving around....

I think we are organic holograms and the body is like a virtual reality space suit for the Soul. So I'm ok with the universe being a Hologram as long as its many other things at the same time including being a three dimensional universe with a anti universe not separate as a Dual Implicate Companion. I think the humans Soul requires an Anti universe and a universe for its existence. How a model of a hologram fits between both must be what quantum physics role is.

@jscotthatcher380

2 жыл бұрын

nice non-science.

@smileifyoudontexist6320

2 жыл бұрын

If a person Looks very closely at their moving hand…. If you see what movement is and what space it is moving…. Zapp ! You will immediately understand how exactly we are all holograms…. If a person doesn’t see , if I’m not seeing it or experiencing it, Then I’m taking for granted spaceTime and the Existence happening in it. We are all inside the event Horizon Together .= that’s how we got “sorta Frozen in Time” ?

@michaelfried3123

2 жыл бұрын

sounds like you take too much acid.

@markrockliff2742

2 жыл бұрын

@@smileifyoudontexist6320 The event horizon is the condensed layer of compacted Strings that all that fell into the black hole were made off. To appreciate that we are holograms requires us to experience our our sub conches led view of the quantum biological nature of Nature. You need to let go of your egoic mind set that gets in the way.

@smileifyoudontexist6320

2 жыл бұрын

@@markrockliff2742 Yeah ! Something Like that.. We Humans are Also Part Animals with a survival Instinct.. Fighting and Fucking is more important for Biological survival than Realizing We are Holograms…. Our Brains are Electro-Chemical Quantum Computers and our Mind is the Remote control. Atma is the Observer and Witness . Looking out at the world it appears Real. Looking to Pivot it is Seen as Unreal…?

Brian

3:00 это видео снято на Крещатике в Киеве. Украина)

The sound effects make this intolerable at times

Brian is the man

So the earth really IS flat! Wait til I tell my therapist this one! I'll get the good meds this month!

9 36

With all due respect, Brian Green is not the best communicator to us lay persons. This video is an example of just what I am referring to. I would highly recommend Lennard Susskind presentations on KZread if you really want to understand and gain tremendous insight to holography. Or even better his book, The Black Hole Wars. His Holographic theory that resolves the paradox of lost information (entropy) that Stephen Hawkins postulated in the mid seventies.

@michaelfried3123

2 жыл бұрын

this subject is still rubbish philosophy masquerading as science...

@Ascendlocal

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelfried3123 your opinion. Respectfully, I would bet you are not well read on the subject. But let me ask you a question. Does information (entropy) when crossing over the event horizon unable to return, disappear forever from the universe? BTW, not a rubbish question.. if your answer is yes, it changes almost everything we know of physics. The 2nd law of thermodynamics, the conservation of energy. So, you can’t tell us the question is rubbish, and if your answer to the question is no, then by all means, what is a possible solution to the paradox other than the Holographic Principal? I await. Granted, it’s not easy to understand and why Brian Greens video is a terrible attempt. You must have a basis of understanding, anti de sitter space, Hawking radiation and other prerequisite subjects. Why I recommended Lennard Susskind book. It took he and several other 30:years to come up with “accepted” solution by the far majority of theoretical physicists, not philosophers. Confession? I had to read the book twice before I really could grasp the concept, forget the math. We have to be in Awe of such brilliant minds, Susskind, Guth, Linde, Ed Witten, Kip Thorn, Sean Carroll, May Tagmark. Amazing, mind blowing reality in which we reside and we are only are beginning our journey. So, don’t diminish their accomplishments. Their entire lives devoted to contributions, both incremental but nevertheless, so important to progress, understanding.

@jack00scarecrow

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ascendlocal mic drop :)

@andsalomoni

2 жыл бұрын

When a photon passes through a polarizing filter, the information about its previous polarization is lost. Why shouldn't information disappear? Is there an "information conservation" principle?

@Ascendlocal

2 жыл бұрын

@@andsalomoni Yes, in the classical world, information can indeed be copied or deleted anytime and at will. However, in the quantum world, information cannot be created nor destroyed. So there is the Principal, “conservation of quantum information”. And as you already understand, Quantum physics is the reduction, underlying Newtonian physics or our normal perception of reality

If ur projecting ur using something to project from...means we are alive somewhere else and projecting ourselves here in this game

It’s su Important tu know the sky and of Things , La verità è incredibilmente più spettacolare e affascinante della fiction

. I'm being respectful when I say your on too many videos. It's not your info your riding the waves on.

It's really a shame that a cleric gets millions of views, just because he talks about how to go to the bathroom or some hate speech. And in such a science video, there are only a few people :(

We will never know exactly what all this is cause we we're not here at the very beginning so everything will always be just theories